ZBORNIK RADOVA VIZANTOLO[KOG INSTITUTA HßÇH UDC 949.5+7.033.2+877.3(05) ISSN 0584–9888 INSTITUT D’ÉTUDES BYZANTINES DE L’ACADÉMIE SERBE DES SCIENCES ET DES ARTS RECUEIL DES TRAVAUX DE L’INSTITUT D’ÉTUDES BYZANTINES XßÇX Rédacteur LJUBOMIR MAKSIMOVI] Directeur de l’Institut d’études byzantines Comité de rédaction Jean-Claude Cheynet (Paris), Evangelos Chrysos (Athenes), Vujadin Ivani{evi}, Jovanka Kali}, Sergej Karpov (Moscou), Bojana Krsmanovi}, Aleksandar Loma, Ljubomir Maksimovi}, Miodrag Markovi}, Claudia Rapp (Vienne), Peter Schreiner (Munich), Gojko Suboti}, Mirjana @ivojinovi} Secretaires de la redaction Dejan D`elebd`i}, Predrag Komatina BEOGRAD 2012 UDK 949.5+7.033.2+877.3(05) ISSN 0584–9888 VIZANTOLO[KI INSTITUT SRPSKE AKADEMIJE NAUKA I UMETNOSTI ZBORNIK RADOVA VIZANTOLO[KOG INSTITUTA XßÇX Urednik QUBOMIR MAKSIMOVI] direktor Vizantolo{kog instituta Redakcioni odbor Mirjana @ivojinovi}, Vujadin Ivani{evi}, Jovanka Kali}, Sergej Karpov (Moskva), Bojana Krsmanovi}, Aleksandar Loma, Qubomir Maksimovi}, Miodrag Markovi}, Klaudija Rap (Be~), Gojko Suboti}, Evangelos Hrisos (Atina), @an-Klod [ene (Pariz), Peter [rajner (Minhen) Sekretari redakcije Dejan Xelebxi}, Predrag Komatina BEOGRAD 2012 Prihva}eno za {tampu na sednici Odeqewa istorijskih nauka SANU, 28. novembra 2012. godine. Ova kwiga objavqena je uz finansijsku pomo} Ministarstva prosvete, nauke i tehnolo{kog razvoja Republike Srbije SADR@AJ — TABLE DES MATIERES Miroslava Mirkovi}, Co-regency: Constantine and Licinivs and the political division of the Balkans --------------------------- 7 Miroslava Mirkovi}, Savladari: Konstantin i Licinije i podela Balkanskog poluostrva 17 Milo{ Cvetkovi}, Ukqu~ivawe Slovena i Vlaha u sistem vizantijske provin- cijske organizacije na jugu Balkana do XI veka. Sli~nosti i razlike - - - 19 Milo{ Cvetkovi}, The Slavs and Vlachs in the Byzantine system of provincial organiza- tion in the Southern Balkans until the XI century. Similarities and differencies 39 Valerio Massimo Minale, About the reception of the Isaurian Ekloge in Byzantine Italy: an effort of comparison with the Slavian world and mainly Stefan Du{an’s Serbian Empire ------------------------- 43 Valerio Masimo Minale, O recepciji isavrijanske Ekloge u vizantijskoj Itali- ji: poku{aj pore|ewa sa slovenskim svetom i posebno sa Srpskim carstvom StefanaDu{ana------------------------ 73 Bojan Novakovi}, Dukqa u spisu De administrando imperio --------- 75 Bojan Novakovi}, Dioclea in De administrando imperio ----------- 85 Bojana Krsmanovi}, Zna~aj Atona i Ohridske arhiepiskopije u politici Vasi- lija II naBalkanu------------------------ 87 Bojana Krsmanovi}, The importance of Mount Athos and the Ohrid Archbishopric for thepolicyofBasilIIintheBalkans----------------- 111 Frederick Lauritzen, Autocrate negli encomi imperiali di Michele Psello (1018–1081) 113 Frederik Lauricen, Avtokrator u panegiricima Mihaila Psela (1018–1081) - - 124 Jasmina [aranac Stamenkovi}, Konstantin X Duka u carskom govoru Mihaila Psela----------------------------- 127 Jasmina [aranac Stamenkovi}, Constantine X Doukas in an enkomion by Michael Psellos ---------------------------- 142 Antonios Vratimos, In the Chronographia, is Michael Psellos’ concern for the army en- tirely disinterested? ----------------------- 145 Andonios Vratimos, Da li Pselova zainteresovanost za vojsku u Hronografiji uop{tenijemotivisanali~nimrazlozima?------------- 157 Predrag Komatina,SrbijaiDukqaudeluJovanaSkilice--------- 159 Predrag Komatina, SerbiaandDiocleaintheworkofJohnSkylitzes------ 184 Relja Seferovi}, Ljepota dijaloga. Rasprave gr~kih i latinskih teologa u vrijeme Kom- nena iz zapadne perspektive -------------------- 187 Relja Seferovi}, The beauty of dialog. The disputes between the Greek and Latin theologians in the period of the Komnenoi from the western perspective - - - 211 Dragana Pavlovi}, Kult i ikonografija dvojice svetih Andreja sa Krita - - - 213 Dragana Pavlovi}, Le culte et l’iconographie des deux St. Andre de Crete---- 239 Savvas Kyriakidis, The idea of civil war in thirteenth and fourteenth-century — Byzantium 243 Savas Kiriakidis,Idejaogra|anskomratuuVizantiji13.i14.veka---- 255 Bojana Pavlovi},SrbiudelimaDimitrijaKidona------------ 257 Bojana Pavlovi}, Serbs in the works of Demetrios Cydones ---------- 296 Marka Tomi} \uri}, The man of sorrows and the lamenting Virgin: the example at Markov manastir ------------------------ 303 Marka Tomi} \uri}, Mrtvi Hristos i Pla~ Bogorodi~in u Markovom manastiru 330 Tatjana Starodubcev, O portretima u Ravanici ------------- 333 Tatjana Starodubcev, On portraits in Ravanica --------------- 353 Bojan Miqkovi},SrpskipanagijarizVatopeda------------- 355 Bojan Miljkovi}, The Serbian panagiarion from Vatopedi ----------- 363 Maja Nikoli}, H tou Qeou dia twn arcontwn promhqeia — vizantijski arhonti XV vekaireligioznezadu`bine.Dvaprimera------------ 365 Maja Nikoli}, H tou Qeou dia twn arcontwn promhqeia — Byzantine 15th century archontes and religious endowments. Two examples ----------- 384 Zbornik radova Vizantolo{kog instituta HßÇH, 2012 Recueil des travaux de l’Institut d’etudes byzantines XßIX, 2012 UDC: 94:321.18Š(37)"03" DOI:10.2298/ZRVI1249007M MIROSLAVA MIRKOVI] (Faculty of Philosophy, Belgrade) CO-REGENCY: CONSTANTINE AND LICINIVS AND THE POLITICAL DIVISION OF THE BALKANS In the agreement which followed the first war between Constantine and Lici- nius and Constantine’s victory on the Campus Ardiensis, Licinius was forced, as generally accepted, to surrender Illyricum where he was undisputed ruler until 316. However he was not neutralized politically and reigned together with Constantine between AD 316 and 324. Some kind of division of the sphere of interest seems to have existed between them. Constantine, whose movements in the Balkans are known from the places of editing laws, visited only the western half, i.e. Illyricum after 316. If we follow the evidence of the places and dates of the promulgation of Constantine’s laws, we can consider the line dividing the region controlled by Constantine and that under Licinius’ command, running from the North to the South and leaving Constantine the Pannonian provinces, Moesia I, Dacia Ripensis, Dacia Mediterranea and Dardania, as well as Macedonia, with the legionary camps on the Danube in Pannonia and Moesia I; the provinces on the East of that line, Moesia II, Scythia Minor and Thracia belonged to the region in which Licinius had command. However, there is evidence indicating that the territorial division of the Balkans be- tween Constantine and Licinius after the battle of Cibalae was not strictly observed except on the Danube, in the zone where the military camps were located. In spite of Constantine’s presence in Illyricum, Licinius’s influence on the high commanders on the Danube never disappeared nor did his presence in the provinces he lost after the Bellum Cibalense. Licinius had the jubilee silver plates made for his decennalia in Naissus in Dacia Mediterranea. The siver plates which have been produced in Naissus, in the part of the Balkans which was under Constantine’s control, bear the inscription LICINI AVGVSTE SEMPER VINCAS. The co-operation between Constantine and Licinius concerned the defense of the frontiers and the administra- tion in both parts of the Empire, but it was not based on the subordination of one to another as it was in the time of Diocletian who created the system tetrarchy. Key words: co-regency, Constantine, Licinius, battle of Cibalae, Licinius’ decennalia, silver plates from Naissus, territorial division between Augusti and Caesares. 8 ZRVI XLIX (2012) 7–18 The struggle between Constantine and Licinius was fought for supremacy in the military command in Illyricum. Licinius became the undisputed ruler in the vast region which encompassed all of the Danube provinces after Galerius’ death in AD 311. From 311 to 316 the huge military forces on the Danube frontier from Vindobona to the Black Sea were under his command. He gained control of Asia Minor and the East by defeating Maximinus Daza in 313. Constantine came to power after his father’s death, by being proclaimed Augustus by the army in Britain. He inherited his father’s rank, position, army and the task of defending the fron- tiers in Britain, Gaul and Spain, but he would never be satisfied with being Au- gustus only in the western half of the Empire. His next step was to defeat other rulers and to be recognized in other parts of the Empire. He moved his troops fur- ther from Gaul and invaded Italy first where Maxentius, the son of Maximianus, had seized power. Constantine crushed Maxentius’ forces on the Pons Milvii in Rome in 312 and established control over Italy. From the military point of view it was not a great victory. The best army was located on the Danube under the com- mand of Licinius. If Constantine wanted to gain control of the frontier on the Dan- ube with its military strength camped here, it was necessary to neutralize Licinius in Illyricum. Constantine’s relationship with Licinius was initially a friendly one. He met him in Milan in 313 and after making the agreement about the tolerance of the Christians, Licinius’ marriage with Constantine’s sister was celebrated. Their posi- tions were unequal. Licinius retained his predominance in the balance of power since he had command over the massive military forces on the Danube. This rep- resented the main obstacle to Constantine in his aspiration to be the sole ruler in the Empire. The first disagreement between Constantine and Licinius was provoked by Constantine’s