Human Behaviour & Urban Squares
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
EXAMENSARBETE INOM SAMHÄLLSBYGGNAD, AVANCERAD NIVÅ, 30 HP STOCKHOLM, SVERIGE 2019 Human Behaviour & Urban Squares A Public Life Study of Kungsträdgården and Sergels Torg JOHAN MATTSSON KTH SKOLAN FÖR ARKITEKTUR OCH SAMHÄLLSBYGGNAD Human Behaviour & Urban Squares A Public Life Study of Kungsträdgården and Sergels Torg Johan Mattsson KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Urban Planning and Environment, Division of Urban and Regional Studies 2 Human Behaviour & Urban Squares 3 Abstract Some public squares experience large amounts of human activity and some experience very little, even though external conditions between them create comparable opportunities for public life. The field of public life studies observes the human activity of public spaces and presents principles that predicts human public behaviour to gain a better understanding for what elements of space people are attracted to. The human staying activity at two central public square in Stockholm – Kungsträdgården and Sergels Torg – was studied with the methodology of public life studies as outlined in Gehl & Svarre (2013) How to Study Public Life. A stationary activity mapping was performed for the two squares where female, male, sitting and standing activity was registered. The result show that Kungsträdgården attracts more than twice the staying activity as Sergels Torg, and that the two squares are mirror images of each other in terms of gender and activity proportions, with Kungsträdgården being predominately female and sitting and Sergels Torg male and standing. The principles, theories, previous observations and hypotheses from a selection of the most seminal works within the public life studies field frame the seven themes used to analyse the human stationary activity at the two squares; Sitting, Standing, Thermal Comfort, Psychological Comfort, Sensory Comfort, Aesthetics and Human Interaction. 4 Human Behaviour & Urban Squares Acknowledgments I would first like to sincerely thank my supervisor Elisabetta Troglio, who have provided constant inputs from her wealth of knowledge, read drafts of the work and given constructive feedback and discussing everything from the design of the park outside the conference room at the Centre for the Future of Places to the nature of her profession, it has been greatly appreciated and the study is vastly improved for it. I also want to thank my examiner Hans Westlund and student opponent Ninél Sukovich for reading my work and giving their insightful comments. I would finally like to thank my friends and flatmates Martin and Oskar who’ve always happily engaged in discussion about my work and lent me a spot on our kitchen table for the execution of this work. 5 Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................... 8 Ontological foundation ............................................................................................. 10 Background ............................................................................................................... 11 Definition of a square ............................................................................................... 13 Aim ............................................................................................................................ 13 Research questions ................................................................................................... 14 Objectives .................................................................................................................. 14 Methodology ............................................................................................................. 15 Delimitation .............................................................................................................. 21 Kungsträdgården – Background .................................................................................. 23 History ....................................................................................................................... 23 Design ........................................................................................................................ 26 Use ............................................................................................................................. 27 Sergels Torg – Background .......................................................................................... 29 History ....................................................................................................................... 29 Design ........................................................................................................................ 31 Use ............................................................................................................................. 32 Literature Study ........................................................................................................... 36 Thematic Literature Summary ................................................................................. 36 Camillo Sitte (1889) The Art of Building Cities ....................................................... 48 Jane Jacobs (1961) The Death and Life of Great American Cities .......................... 55 William H. Whyte (1980) The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces ........................... 57 Clare Cooper Marcus & Carolyn Francis (1990) People Places ............................... 64 Jan Gehl (2010) Cities for People ............................................................................. 75 Jan Gehl & Birgitte Svarre (2013) How to Study Public Life ................................... 83 Results & Analysis ........................................................................................................ 88 Sitting ........................................................................................................................ 88 Standing .................................................................................................................. 106 Thermal Comfort .................................................................................................... 113 Psychological Comfort ............................................................................................ 122 Sensory Comfort ..................................................................................................... 135 Aesthetics ................................................................................................................ 142 Human Interaction ................................................................................................. 148 6 Human Behaviour & Urban Squares Discussion ................................................................................................................... 158 Academic framework .............................................................................................. 158 Correspondence between literature and data ........................................................ 158 Relationship between staying activity and the design of urban squares ............... 158 Conclusion .................................................................................................................. 162 References .................................................................................................................. 164 Image sources ......................................................................................................... 170 Table of figures ........................................................................................................ 171 Table of tables ......................................................................................................... 172 Table of images ....................................................................................................... 172 Appendix A – Stationary Activity Mapping data from Kungsträdgården ................. 175 Appendix B – Stationary Activity Mapping data from Sergels Torg ......................... 177 All images not credited otherwise are photographed by the author 7 Introduction Imagine a finite quantity of space. Imagine an infinite number of possible compositions of this finite quantity of space. Imagine having the responsibility to prioritise between this infinite number of possible compositions of this finite quantity of space and choose the design that will become reality. What domain is confined by this responsibility? What principles dictate a responsible decision? What guides these principles? Finitude is the plight of reality. Every tree will fall, everyone alive will die and the third planet from the sun consist of a finite quantity of space. What is to be done with space is hence a question worth asking. A finite supply can’t satisfy an infinite demand. Prioritisation between alternatives is better described as a necessity than the product of a hierarchy of interests or needs, even though it is a product of such hierarchies. That meaningful needs reign supreme in these hierarchies is the burden of humanity. The responsibility to choose is the responsibility to make a meaningful choice. The single constant throughout million years of human history – and consequently future – is humans. Humans will remain as long as human development persist. Technology will change, philosophy will change, politics will change, the climate will change, humans won’t. True social sustainability can only be found in a greater understanding