DOCSLIB.ORG

Realizing the Potential Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Realizing the Potential Of http://www.nap.edu/catalog/6457.html We ship printed books within 1 business day; personal PDFs are available immediately. Realizing the Potential of C4I: Fundamental Challenges Committee to Review DOD C4I Plans and Programs, Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Applications, National Research Council ISBN: 0-309-51873-3, 298 pages, 6 x 9, (1999) This PDF is available from the National Academies Press at: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/6457.html Visit the National Academies Press online, the authoritative source for all books from the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, the Institute of Medicine, and the National Research Council: • Download hundreds of free books in PDF • Read thousands of books online for free • Explore our innovative research tools – try the “Research Dashboard” now! • Sign up to be notified when new books are published • Purchase printed books and selected PDF files Thank you for downloading this PDF. If you have comments, questions or just want more information about the books published by the National Academies Press, you may contact our customer service department toll- free at 888-624-8373, visit us online, or send an email to [email protected]. This book plus thousands more are available at http://www.nap.edu. Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise indicated, all materials in this PDF File are copyrighted by the National Academy of Sciences. Distribution, posting, or copying is strictly prohibited without written permission of the National Academies Press. Request reprint permission for this book. Realizing the Potential of C4I: Fundamental Challenges http://www.nap.edu/catalog/6457.html REALIZING THE POTENTIAL OF C4I FUNDAMENTAL CHALLENGES Committee to Review DOD C4I Plans and Programs Computer Science and Telecommunications Board Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Applications National Research Council NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS Washington, D.C. 1999 Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Realizing the Potential of C4I: Fundamental Challenges http://www.nap.edu/catalog/6457.html NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medi- cine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance. Support for this project was provided by the Department of Defense. Any opinions, find- ings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsor. Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 99-62272 International Standard Book Number 0-309-06485-6 Additional copies of this report are available from: National Academy Press 2101 Constitution Avenue, NW Box 285 Washington, DC 20055 800/624-6242 202/334-3313 (in the Washington Metropolitan Area) http://www.nap.edu Copyright 1999 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Realizing the Potential of C4I: Fundamental Challenges http://www.nap.edu/catalog/6457.html COMMITTEE TO REVIEW DOD C4I PLANS AND PROGRAMS JAMES C. McGRODDY, IBM (retired), Chair CHARLES HERZFELD, Private Consultant, Vice Chair NORMAN ABRAMSON, ALOHA Networks EDWARD BALKOVICH, Bell Atlantic JORDAN BARUCH, Jordan Baruch Associates RICHARD BASEIL, Telcordia Technologies (formerly Bellcore) THOMAS A. BERSON, Anagram Laboratories RICHARD KEMMERER, University of California at Santa Barbara BUTLER LAMPSON, Microsoft Corporation DAVID M. MADDOX, Gen USA (retired), Private Consultant PAUL D. MILLER, ADM USN (retired), Alliant Technology Systems CARL G. O’BERRY, Lt Gen USAF (retired) JOHN H. QUILTY, MITRE Corporation ROBERT H. REED, Gen USAF (retired), Lear Astronics Corporation H. GREGORY TORNATORE, Applied Physics Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University Staff HERBERT S. LIN, Senior Scientist and Study Director JON EISENBERG, Program Officer JULIE ESANU, Research Associate MARK BALKOVICH, Research Associate MICKELLE RODGERS, Project Assistant NICCI T. DOWD, Project Assistant DAVID PADGHAM, Project Assistant iii Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Realizing the Potential of C4I: Fundamental Challenges http://www.nap.edu/catalog/6457.html COMPUTER SCIENCE AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS BOARD DAVID D. CLARK, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Chair FRANCES E. ALLEN, IBM T.J. Watson Research Center JAMES CHIDDIX, Time Warner Cable JOHN M. CIOFFI, Stanford University W. BRUCE CROFT, University of Massachusetts at Amherst A.G. (SANDY) FRASER, AT&T SUSAN L. GRAHAM, University of California at Berkeley JAMES GRAY, Microsoft Corporation PATRICK M. HANRAHAN, Stanford University JUDITH HEMPEL, University of California at San Francisco BUTLER W. LAMPSON, Microsoft Corporation EDWARD D. LAZOWSKA, University of Washington DAVID LIDDLE, Interval Research JOHN MAJOR, Wireless Knowledge TOM M. MITCHELL, Carnegie Mellon University DONALD NORMAN, Nielsen Norman Group RAYMOND OZZIE, Groove Networks DAVID A. PATTERSON, University of California at Berkeley LEE SPROULL, Boston University LESLIE L. VADASZ, Intel Corporation Staff MARJORY S. BLUMENTHAL, Director HERBERT S. LIN, Senior Scientist JERRY R. SHEEHAN, Senior Program Officer ALAN S. INOUYE, Program Officer JON EISENBERG, Program Officer JANET D. BRISCOE, Administrative Associate RITA GASKINS, Project Assistant NICCI T. DOWD, Project Assistant DAVID PADGHAM, Project Assistant MARGARET MARSH, Project Assistant iv Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Realizing the Potential of C4I: Fundamental Challenges http://www.nap.edu/catalog/6457.html COMMISSION ON PHYSICAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICS, AND APPLICATIONS PETER M. BANKS, ERIM International, Inc., Co-chair W. CARL LINEBERGER, University of Colorado, Co-chair WILLIAM BROWDER, Princeton University LAWRENCE D. BROWN, University of Pennsylvania MARSHALL H. COHEN, California Institute of Technology RONALD G. DOUGLAS, Texas A&M University JOHN E. ESTES, University of California at Santa Barbara JERRY P. GOLLUB, Haverford College MARTHA P. HAYNES, Cornell University JOHN L. HENNESSY, Stanford University CAROL M. JANTZEN, Westinghouse Savannah River Company PAUL G. KAMINSKI, Technovation, Inc. KENNETH H. KELLER, University of Minnesota MARGARET G. KIVELSON, University of California at Los Angeles DANIEL KLEPPNER, Massachusetts Institute of Technology JOHN KREICK, Sanders, a Lockheed Martin Company MARSHA I. LESTER, University of Pennsylvania M. ELISABETH PATÉ-CORNELL, Stanford University NICHOLAS P. SAMIOS, Brookhaven National Laboratory CHANG-LIN TIEN, University of California at Berkeley NORMAN METZGER, Executive Director v Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Realizing the Potential of C4I: Fundamental Challenges http://www.nap.edu/catalog/6457.html The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating so- ciety of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare. Upon the authority of the charter granted to it by the Congress in 1863, the Academy has a mandate that requires it to advise the federal govern- ment on scientific and technical matters. Dr. Bruce Alberts is president of the National Academy of Sciences. The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964, under the char- ter of the National Academy of Sciences, as a parallel organization of outstanding engineers. It is autonomous in its administration and in the selection of its mem- bers, sharing with the National Academy of Sciences the responsibility for advis- ing the federal government. The National Academy of Engineering also sponsors engineering programs aimed at meeting national needs, encourages education and research, and recognizes the superior achievements of engineers. Dr. William A. Wulf is president of the National Academy of Engineering. The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Academy of Sciences to secure the services of eminent members of appropriate professions in the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. The Insti- tute acts under the responsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences by its congressional charter to be an adviser to the federal government and, upon its own initiative, to identify issues of medical care, research, and education. Dr. Kenneth I. Shine is president of the Institute of Medicine. The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of Sci- ences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the Academy’s purposes of furthering knowledge and advising the federal gov- ernment. Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy, the Council has become the principal operating agency of both the Na- tional Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in provid- ing services to the government, the public, and the scientific and engineering com- munities. The Council is administered jointly by both Academies and the Institute of Medicine. Dr. Bruce Alberts and Dr. William A. Wulf are chairman and vice chairman, respectively, of the National Research Council. Copyright
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2008 by Derek Van Ittersum. Some Rights Reserved Creative
    2008 by Derek Van Ittersum. Some Rights Reserved Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 license REASSEMBLING WRITING TECHNOLOGIES: HISTORICAL AND SITUATED STUDIES OF RHETORICAL ACTIVITY BY DEREK VAN ITTERSUM B.A., Drake University, 2001 M.A., University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2003 DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in English with a concentration in Writing Studies in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2008 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Professor Gail E. Hawisher, Chair Associate Professor Paul Prior Associate Professor Peter Mortensen Professor Bertram C. Bruce ii Abstract Writers have responded to new media technologies of writing and communicating by refashioning existing literate practices for computers and developing new computing practices. Combining historical research on hypertextual, collaborative writing environments from the 1960s with situated studies of current writers adopting software to support memory and invention, my dissertation examines the reflexive processes through which material technologies, literate practices, and literate ideologies are shaped. Prompted by the rapid proliferation of computer technologies and their disruption of existing practices, many writing researchers have focused on the materiality of writing; however, a comprehensive framework that links materiality, ideologies, and practices has remained elusive. In this dissertation, I argue that a combination of theories of mediated activity and actor-network theory offers a productive way to understand, and intervene in, emergent uses of writing technologies. This dissertation begins with the early history of personal computers for writing. Although Douglas Engelbart’s NLS computer from the late 1960s has influenced modern hardware and software design in some ways, its writing software was less well received.
    [Show full text]
  • Celebrating the Man Who Invented the Mouse 11 December 2008
    Celebrating the man who invented the mouse 11 December 2008 together," said Andries van Dam, a computer science professor at Brown University who attended the original 1968 demo in San Francisco and called it an "other-worldly experience." The mouse was merely a byproduct of Engelbart's larger vision, said his daughter, Christina Engelbart, executive director of the Doug Engelbart Institute. "That was what the public recognizes as a great innovation that's really had a huge impact on everyone. But truly his greatest innovation of all was the vision and the strategic organizing principles that catapulted the innovation of his lab Doug Engelbart took the stage to thank the audience at and that could catapult the work today if it was the finale of the 40th Anniversary Celebration of the applied and harnessed in teams and revolutionary SRI demo on interactive computing. Image: L.A. Cicero organizations," she said. "It's frustrating in a way," said Jeff Rulifson, a research director at Sun Microsystems Laboratories (PhysOrg.com) -- Forty years ago, Stanford and a witness to the original demo. "Doug had researcher Doug Engelbart got a standing ovation these grand ideas. And we've realized some of in a San Francisco auditorium after dramatically them, in what's happened with computers. But he introducing the computer mouse, hyperlinks, live also had grand ideas about how we could be able text editing and interactive computing in an historic to work cooperatively using computers to solve demo at the 1968 Fall Joint Computer Conference. large problems." Tuesday, in Stanford's Memorial Auditorium, the gray-haired, 83-year-old electrical engineer Sometimes, Engelbart was so far ahead of the received another round of applause.
    [Show full text]
  • A Personal History of Modeless Text Editing and Cut/Copy-Paste
    FORUM TIMELINES Timelines provides perspectives on HCI history, glancing back at a road that sometimes took unexpected branches and turns. History is not a dry list of events; it is about points of view and differing interpretations. Jonathan Grudin, Editor A Personal History of Modeless Text Editing and Cut/Copy-Paste Larry Tesler Consultant | [email protected] Larry Tesler’s vision of interaction The 1960s a paranoid patient. While working design process has inspired many In 1960, while a student at the on his team, I got to know Alan designers, developers, and researchers. Bronx High School of Science, I Kay, Don Norman, Terry Winograd, His leadership in early graphical user learned a FORTRAN-like language. and David Canfield Smith—all of interface successes led to his receiving I loved its power, but its unintuitive whom became HCI pioneers—and SIGCHI’s Lifetime Practice Award in restrictions frustrated me. I learned a little about cognitive 2011. —Jonathan Grudin In 1961, I entered Stanford psychology. I have been a computer program- as a freshman. In 1962, I made In early 1969, I visited Doug mer for more than 50 years. From usability improvements to a pio- Engelbart’s Augmentation Research the beginning, I was annoyed by neering animation language. Center at SRI in Menlo Park, software that made life harder That project gave me experience California. Engelbart had recently than necessary for users. I got to do with discount usability studies given the first public demonstration something about it as a student at and participatory design [1]. of NLS (oN Line System), a vision- Stanford University and in a variety Soon, word got around that I ary prototype built on a time-shar- of subsequent engineering, user was a pretty good programmer ing system [2].
    [Show full text]
  • The Future – the Way to a Personal Dynamic Medium for Creative Thought
    Back to the Future – The Way to a Personal Dynamic Medium for Creative Thought Matthias Müller-Prove Why look back? »I don’t know who discovered water but I know it wasn’t a fish.« Marshall McLuhan Vannevar Bush (*1890 †1974) 1945 As We May Think »… publication has been extended far beyond our present ability to make real use of the record.« Memex Sputnik Shock 1957 First artificial satellite launched by USSR 1958 Advanced Research Project Agency (ARPA) founded Joseph R. Licklider (*1915 †1990) 1960 Man-Computer Symbiosis »The hope is that … human brains and computing machines will be coupled together very tightly and that the resulting partnership will think as no human brain has ever thought and process data in a way not approached by the information- handling machines we know today.« Ivan Sutherland (*1938) 1963 Sketchpad, a Man-Machine Graphical Communication System Ivan Sutherland (*1938) 1963 Sketchpad, a Man-Machine Graphical Communication System Today Throughput Computing at Sun Microsystems Theodor Holm Nelson (*1937) 1965 The Hypertext 1967 Hypertext Editing System (HES) by Ted Nelson and Andries van Dam 1972 ComputerLib/Dream Machines Xanadu / Dream Machines Douglas Engelbart (*1925) 1962 Augmenting Human Intellect: A Conceptual Framework Stanford Research Institute - Augmentation Research Center (SRI-ARC) Augment/NLS Stanford Research Center /ARC Stanford Research Center /ARC Stanford Research Center /ARC Stanford Research Center /ARC Stanford Research Center /ARC 1968: “The Mother of all Demos” How long did it take to reboot
    [Show full text]
  • April 2009 Newsletter
    SRI Alumni Association Newsletter • April 2009 1 APRIL 2009 NEWSLETTER MESSAGE FROM PRESIDENT BOYD FAIR As I was preparing to write this history and use and included it with the picture for your introduction, I was thinking back reading and viewing pleasure. over the interesting and happy times I had during my 40 years at SRI. Looking at current times, we have summarized Curt’s Then I recalled seeing a recent Sony most recent All-Hands Meeting, in which he discussed video on YouTube that pointed out the current state of the institute. There is also an annual how our world is changing and how statement of the SRI Alumni Association’s financial health it is affecting SRI and its “family.” For that Pete Valenti has provided. It shows that the organization Boyd Fair example, did you know that the top 10 remains financially healthy with approximately 460 active in-demand jobs in the United States in memberships. And don’t miss the short article on the status 2010 will not even have existed in 2004? The students we of the new Hall of Fame plaque unveiled at the last Alumni know today are preparing for jobs that don’t yet exist and Reunion. that will use technologies that haven’t been invented yet! Furthermore, according to the U.S. Department of Labor, Looking to the future, there are several abstracts of today’s students will have between 10 and 14 jobs by the current research activities at SRI. I think you will find the time they turn 38 years of age.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents U U U
    Contents u u u ACM Awards Reception and Banquet, June 2018 .................................................. 2 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 3 A.M. Turing Award .............................................................................................................. 4 ACM Prize in Computing ................................................................................................. 5 ACM Charles P. “Chuck” Thacker Breakthrough in Computing Award ............. 6 ACM – AAAI Allen Newell Award .................................................................................. 7 Software System Award ................................................................................................... 8 Grace Murray Hopper Award ......................................................................................... 9 Paris Kanellakis Theory and Practice Award ...........................................................10 Karl V. Karlstrom Outstanding Educator Award .....................................................11 Eugene L. Lawler Award for Humanitarian Contributions within Computer Science and Informatics ..........................................................12 Distinguished Service Award .......................................................................................13 ACM Athena Lecturer Award ........................................................................................14 Outstanding Contribution
    [Show full text]
  • Chronicle of the Death of a Laboratory: Douglas Engelbart and the Failure of the Knowledge Workshop
    Chronicle of the Death of a Laboratory: Douglas Engelbart and the Failure of the Knowledge Workshop ––––––––––––––––––– THIERRY BARDINI AND MICHAEL FRIEDEWALD It is common knowledge that California, especially the San Francisco Bay Area is the birthplace of modern computing. Between 1945 and 1970 people such as Frederick Terman, professor of electronics at Stanford University, or William Shockley, co-inventor of the transistor transformed the once rural Santa Clara County south of San Francisco into Silicon Valley, the fast growing industrial centre of high-technology.1 But the Bay Area of the 1960s is not only well known for technical ingenuity but also as the stronghold of social movements (anti-Vietnam, civil rights, women’s liberation), that are often subsumed under the term ‘counter culture’.2 It is sometimes overlooked that there was an intense interaction between these two developments, at least during a short time around 1970. In this chapter we will analyse the creative and destructive effects of this interaction. Therefore it focuses on Douglas C. Engelbart and his computer science laboratory at the Stanford Research Institute in Menlo Park, CA. DOUGLAS CARL ENGELBART: A REDISCOVERED PIONEER OF PERSONAL COMPUTING Until recently very few people knew ‘Doug’ Engelbart (born 1925) outside the computer science community. But after he had received some of the major computer science awards for his pioneering work in interactive computing—including the National Medal of Technology, the highest award in its class in the United States,
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Internet
    History of the Internet Zhonghong Ou Aalto University School of Science and Technology Zhonghong Ou 11/09/2012 Aalto University History of the Internet Agenda • Prehistory of the Internet • History of the Internet-first decade • Growth and development of the Internet History of the Internet 2 Zhonghong Ou Prehistory of the Internet • Nicola Tesla (1908) – “It will be possible for a business man in New York to dictate instructions, and have them instantly appear in type at his office in London or elsewhere. He will be able to call up, from his desk, and talk to any telephone subscriber on the globe. An inexpensive instrument, not bigger than a watch, will enable its bearer to hear anywhere, on sea or land, music or song, the speech of a political leader, the address of an eminent man of science, or the sermon of an eloquent clergyman, delivered in some other place, however distant. In the same manner any picture, character, drawing, or print can be transferred from one to another place.[1]” • Heinrich Hertz (created radio waves) – “I do not think that the wireless waves I have discovered will have any practical application.” • President Rutherford B. Hayes (to Alexander Graham Bell in 1876 on viewing the telephone for the first time) – “That’s an amazing invention, but who would ever want to use one of them?” • Thomas Watson, chairman of IBM, 1943 – “I think there is a world market for maybe five computers.” • Ken Olson, president, chairman, and founder of Digital Equipment Corp., 1977 – “There is no reason anyone would want a computer in their home.” Introduction to the Course 3 [1] W.
    [Show full text]
  • 30 Years of Rfcs
    Network Working Group RFC Editor, et al. Request for Comments: 2555 USC/ISI Category: Informational 7 April 1999 30 Years of RFCs Status of this Memo This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. Copyright Notice Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1999). All Rights Reserved. Table of Contents 1. Introduction.................................................. 2 2. Reflections................................................... 2 3. The First Pebble: Publication of RFC 1........................ 3 4. RFCs - The Great Conversation................................. 5 5. Reflecting on 30 years of RFCs................................ 9 6. Favorite RFCs -- The First 30 Years...........................14 7. Security Considerations.......................................15 8. Acknowledgments...............................................15 9. Authors' Addresses............................................15 10. APPENDIX - RFC 1..............................................17 11. Full Copyright Statement......................................18 RFC Editor, et al. Informational [Page 1] RFC 2555 30 Years of RFCs 7 April 1999 1. Introduction - Robert Braden Thirty years ago today, the first Request for Comments document, RFC 1, was published at UCLA (ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc1.txt). This was the first of a series that currently contains more than 2500 documents on computer networking, collected, archived, and edited by Jon Postel for 28 years. Jon has left us, but this 30th anniversary tribute to the RFC series is assembled in grateful admiration for his massive contribution. The rest of this document contains a brief recollection from the present RFC Editor Joyce K. Reynolds, followed by recollections from three pioneers: Steve Crocker who wrote RFC 1, Vint Cerf whose long- range vision continues to guide us, and Jake Feinler who played a key role in the middle years of the RFC series.
    [Show full text]
  • Larry Page, Sergey Brin, and Backrub
    We congratulate the following students as they have been elected as Office bearers of the Cyber Crews Association for the year 2013-2014. S.NO NAME CLASS DESIGNATION 1 Balaji G III B.Sc (CS)’A’ Chairman 2 Raja C III B.Sc(CS) ’B’ Vice-Chairman 3 Aishwarya G III B.Sc (CS) ’B’ Secretary 4 Gowtham S III B.Sc(CS) ’A’ Joint secretary 5 Nivetha T III B.Sc (CS) ’B’ Treasurer 6 Mathiarasu S III B.Sc (CS) ’A’ Executive member 7 Subash K III B.Sc(CS) ’B’ Executive member 8 Naresh kumar M II B.Sc (CS) ’A’ Executive member 9 Sathya M II B.Sc(CS) ’A’ Executive member 10 Jaya Shree R II B.Sc(CS) ’B’ Executive member 11 Deepan Chakravarthy K II B.Sc(CS) ’B’ Executive member 12 Suganesh S II B.Sc(CS) ’C’ Executive member 13 Krishnah Kumaar P II B.Sc(CS) ’C’ Executive member 14 Banu Priya J I B.Sc (CS) ’A’ Executive member 15 Rajesh G I B.Sc (CS) ’B’ Executive member 16 Tamilselvan V I B.Sc (CS) ’C’ Executive member 1. ANDROID ~~~~~~~~ 01 1.1 ANDROID 5.0 1.2 ANDROID 4.0 1.3 ANDROID 3.0 1.4 ANDROID 2.0 1.5 ANDROID 1.0 2. MAXTHON WEB BROWSER ~~~~~~~ 11 3. SAMSUNG GRAND VS MICRMAX CANVAS 2 HD ~~~~~~~ 15 4. APPLE TV ~~~~~~~ 20 5. FLEXIBLE KEYBOARD ~~~~~~~ 22 6. INSPIRATION FOR THE INVENTIONS ~~~~~~~ 23 6.1 INTERNET 6.2 GOOGLE 6.3 MOBILE 6.4 YOU TUBE 7.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Internet
    History of the Internet Zhonghong Ou Aalto University School of Science and Technology Zhonghong Ou 06/09/2011 Aalto University History of the Internet Agenda • Prehistory of the Internet • History of the Internet-first decade • Growth and development of the Internet History of the Internet 2 Zhonghong Ou Prehistory of the Internet • Nicola Tesla (1908) – “It will be possible for a business man in New York to dictate instructions, and have them instantly appear in type at his office in London or elsewhere. He will be able to call up, from his desk, and talk to any telephone subscriber on the globe. An inexpensive instrument, not bigger than a watch, will enable its bearer to hear anywhere, on sea or land, music or song, the speech of a political leader, the address of an eminent man of science, or the sermon of an eloquent clergyman, delivered in some other place, however distant. In the same manner any picture, character, drawing, or print can be transferred from one to another place.[1]” • Heinrich Hertz (created radio waves) – “I do not think that the wireless waves I have discovered will have any practical application.” • President Rutherford B. Hayes (to Alexander Graham Bell in 1876 on viewing the telephone for the first time) – “That’s an amazing invention, but who would ever want to use one of them?” • Thomas Watson, chairman of IBM, 1943 –“I think there is a world market for maybe five computers.” • Ken Olson, president, chairman, and founder of Digital Equipment Corp., 1977 – “There is no reason anyone would want a computer in their home.” Introduction to the Course 3 [1] W.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mouse and the Desktop
    1 The Mouse and the Desktop Interviews with Doug Engelbart, Stu Card,Tim Mott, and Larry Tesler When you were interacting considerably with the screen, you needed some sort of device to select objects on the screen, to tell the computer that you wanted to do something with them. Douglas C. Engelbart, 2003, referring to 1964 Why a Mouse? • Apple mouse 2002 Who would choose to point, steer, and draw with a blob of plastic as big and clumsy as a bar of soap? We spent all those years Photo Courtesy of Apple learning to write and draw with pencils, pens, and brushes. Sharpen the pencil to a fine point and you can create an image with the most delicate shapes and write in the tiniest letters; it’s not so easy to do that with a mouse. Doug Engelbart1 tells the story of how he invented the mouse.When he was a student, he was measuring the area under some complex-shaped curves, using a device with wheels that would roll in one direction and slide sideways in the axis at ninety degrees. He was bored at a conference, and wrote in his notebook about putting two wheels at right angles to track movement on a plane. Years later, when he was searching for a device to select objects on a computer screen, he remembered those notes, and together with Bill English, he built the first mouse. We use the mouse not just because Doug Engelbart invented it, but because it turned out to be the pointing device that performed best for The Mouse and the Desktop | 17 pointing and clicking on a display, outperforming light pens, cursor keys, joysticks, trackballs, and everything else that was tried in early tests with users.The mouse won because it was the easiest to use.
    [Show full text]