The Social Construction of Turkish Vatan. Geography

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Social Construction of Turkish Vatan. Geography THE SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION OF TURKISH VATAN: GEOGRAPHY AND FOREIGN POLICY A thesis Presented to the Faculty of Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy by BEHLÜL ÖZKAN In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy SEPTEMBER 2009 Dissertation Committee Professor Andrew C. Hess, Chair Professor Alan K. Henrikson Professor Feroz Ahmad UMI Number: 3390192 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI 3390192 Copyright 2010 by ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This edition of the work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1346 Table of Contents Table of Contents……………………………………………………………………………..…II Curriculum Vitae…………………………………………………………………………….…IV Abstract………………………………………………………………………………………...VII Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………………..IX Introduction....................................................................................................................................1 Chapter I Methodology and Research Questions.......................................................................6 I. 1. Realist Hegemony in the Discipline of International Relations I. 2. Problem Solving Theory of Realism I. 3. Critical Theory and International Relations I. 4. A Postmodern Turn in International Relations I. 5. Turkey’s Foreign Policy as a Discourse Chapter II Genealogy of Vatan...................................................................................................49 II. 1. Ottoman Cosmology Facing the West II. 2. The French Revolution and Remaking the Concept of Vatan II. 3. Promoting an Imperial Vatan to Encourage Ottoman Patriotism II. 4. Young Turk Era Chapter III From Imperial to National Vatan..........................................................................98 III. 1. Between Ottomanism, Islamism, and pan-Turkism III. 2. Imagining Anatolia as a National Vatan III. 3. Conclusion Chapter IV From Geography to Vatan....................................................................................158 IV. 1. Geography Education During the Late Ottoman Period II IV. 2. Turkification of Geography after the Establishment of Republic IV. 3. Geography Education after the Second World War IV. 4. Conclusion Chapter V Vatan and Turkey’s Foreign Policy Discourse……………….............................207 V. 1. Nonaligned Foreign Policy from 1923 to 1939: Defending Vatan against European Imperialism V. 2. Turkey’s Foreign Policy Discourse during the Cold War: Protecting Vatan from the Enemies V. 3. Representation of the Soviet Union as a Threat to Vatan V. 4. Representing the Korean War as a Fight for Vatan against Communism V. 5. Cyprus: From Baby-Vatan to a Gangrenous Problem V. 6. Conclusion Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………..………289 Bibliography…………………………………………………………………………………...293 III Behlül Özkan [email protected] EDUCATION 2005- The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University Medford, MA, USA Successfully passed the Comprehensive Exams on Geopolitics, Europe and the Middle East, May 2005 PhD Dissertation: “The Social Construction of Turkish Vatan: Geography and Foreign Policy” 2002 – 2005 The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University Medford, MA, USA Master of Arts in Law and Diplomacy, May 2004 Honors Thesis: “New Geopolitics of Energy Security of Europe” 1993 – 1998 Boğaziçi University Istanbul, Turkey Bachelor of Arts in International Relations and Political Science ACADEMIC PUBLICATIONS August 2008 “Who Gains From the `No War, No Peace` Situation? A Critical Analysis of the Nagorno- Karabakh Conflict,” Journal of Geopolitics 13, no.3 (August 2008): 574-601 October 2006 “New Geopolitics of Energy in the Black Sea Region,” in The Black Sea Region Countries and Prospective Relationships with European Union (Tbilisi: International Black Sea University Press, 2006), 43-50 OTHER PUBLICATIONS April 2009 “24 Nisan Geride Kalırken,” Radikal, April 26th, 2009 July 2008 “Amerikan Rüyası Kabusa Dönerken,” Birikim 230-231 (July*August 2008): 157-161 November 2007 “Ermenistan’da Đktidarı Değiştirmek,” Referans, November 16th 2007 October 2007 “Milliyetçilik Kısırdöngüsünde Bir Ülke: Ermenistan,” Radikal, October 7th, 2007 TEACHING EXPERIENCE Summer 2009 Boğaziçi University, Department of Political Science and International Relations Istanbul, Turkey Pols 439 Diplomacy and Foreign Policy Analysis IV ACADEMIC EXPERIENCE February 2009 Ties That Bind and Ties That Divide Conference, University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, PA, USA Speaker at the Seminar of Global Challenges vs. Local Interests • Presented an article about Transformation of Geopolitical Discourse of Turkey January 2008 Harvard Humanitarian Initiative Cambridge, MA, USA Speaker and one of the five members of the Turkish Team • Participated in the Turkish-Armenian workshop as a speaker of the Turkish team composed by academicians and diplomats September 2007 Beyond the Nation Conference 2007, Queens University Belfast, United Kingdom Speaker at the Seminar of Problematizing Ethnic Conflict in a Globalized World • Presented an article about the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict February 2007 5th International Conference of Eurasian Political Studies Network Moscow, Russia Speaker at the Seminar of Ethnic Factors and External Challenges • Presented an article about the Geopolitics of the Caucasus October 2006 3rd International Silk Road Symposium Tbilisi, Georgia Speaker at the Black Sea Energy Security Seminar • Presented a published article about the European Energy Security from the Black Sea perspective PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 2004- 2006 BTU Ventures Waltham, MA and Dubai, UAE Assistant Vice President, Market Intelligence, Technology and Research • Performed research analysis on various company initiatives and projects, especially in Middle East • Prepared and presented market intelligence reports in power and energy sector • Produced a comprehensive report on Turkish Energy Sector July 2003 Botaş Petroleum Pipeline Cooperation Ankara, Turkey Analyst, Foreign Relations and Strategies Department • Delivered a report on EU natural gas policy and Russia’s increasing influence on EU’s energy security V 1998 - 2002 CNN Türk Broadcasting Company Istanbul, Turkey Foreign Affairs Correspondent and Regional Analyst • Produced political and economic analysis based on visits to Iran, Macedonia, Greece, Bulgaria and Azerbaijan, interviews with senior policy makers from those countries • Conducted research for a television documentary “Azerbaijan, Oil and its Future” PERSONAL • Citizen of Turkey • Languages: Turkish (native), English (fluent), German (fluent), Ottoman Turkish(intermediate) • Exchange student to Cologne, Germany summer 1989, Moscow, USSR summer 1991 • Member of Eskişehirspor Football Club VI Abstract The traditional geopolitical discourse of Turkey is based on the belief that Turkey is located in a unique geography in the world and therefore Turkish homeland, ‘vatan,’ is besieged by internal and external enemies. Vatan has acquired an ahistorical and ontological status, considered as a timeless natural symbol of reality of Turkish nation state. Far from being neutral and authentic, vatan has been a historically constructed spatial grid, upon which various political forces have battled for the control of the national power structure and for the hegemony in physically controlling and representing the vatan. By problematizing the established geographical assumption of Turkey’s foreign policy based upon the nation being engulfed and surrounded by internal and external threats, the dissertation leads to an understanding that defending the vatan legitimizes and confers hegemonic status to the holders of political power. Three noticeable cases in Turkey’s foreign policy are examined: political conflict with the Soviet Union after the Second World War and Turkey’s entry into the anti-Soviet camp, Turkey’s participation in the Korean War, and the Cyprus conflict. Defending the vatan was the common denominator in all these three cases: disagreements with the Soviet Union were reflected as an assault on Turkey’s territorial integrity, Turkey’s participation in the Korean war was defended by the ruling Democrat Party as protecting the vatan from a ‘communist threat’ in the distant Korean peninsula, and the Cyprus conflict was transformed into a nationalist discourse by depicting the island as ‘baby-vatan.’ The dissertation also analyzes how nationalist discourse had become established in educational materials, particularly how state education implanted national ideals into geography textbooks and promoted Turkish national identity and the country’s spatial and cultural features. VII It aims to understand the nationalist representation of space in Turkey and the production of geographical knowledge by the Turkish state to justify its own power and authority over its citizens. Instead of considering national essences as commonsense and matters of fact, the dissertation deconstructs them to reveal processes of power and rhetoric. Processes rather than essences invent national homeland and national boundaries and treat them as meaningful. VIII Acknowledgements Like any other Ph.D. student, at the end of the seven years long graduate
Recommended publications
  • Perceptionsjournal of International Affairs
    PERCEPTIONSJOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS PERCEPTIONS Summer-Autumn 2015 Volume XX Number 2-3 XX Number 2015 Volume Summer-Autumn PERCEPTIONS The Great War and the Ottoman Empire: Origins Ayşegül SEVER and Nuray BOZBORA Redefining the First World War within the Context of Clausewitz’s “Absolute War” Dystopia Burak GÜLBOY Unionist Failure to Stay out of the War in October-November 1914 Feroz AHMAD Austro-Ottoman Relations and the Origins of World War One, 1912-14: A Reinterpretation Gül TOKAY Ottoman Military Reforms on the eve of World War I Odile MOREAU The First World War in Contemporary Russian Histography - New Areas of Research Iskander GILYAZOV Summer-Autumn 2015 Volume XX - Number 2-3 ISSN 1300-8641 PERCEPTIONS Editor in Chief Ali Resul Usul Deputy Editor Birgül Demirtaş Managing Editor Engin Karaca Book Review Editor İbrahim Kaya English Language and Copy Editor Julie Ann Matthews Aydınlı International Advisory Board Bülent Aras Mustafa Kibaroğlu Gülnur Aybet Talha Köse Ersel Aydınlı Mesut Özcan Florian Bieber Thomas Risse Pınar Bilgin Lee Hee Soo David Chandler Oktay Tanrısever Burhanettin Duran Jang Ji Hyang Maria Todorova Ahmet İçduygu Ole Wæver Ekrem Karakoç Jaap de Wilde Şaban Kardaş Richard Whitman Fuat Keyman Nuri Yurdusev Homepage: http://www.sam.gov.tr The Center for Strategic Research (Stratejik Araştırmalar Merkezi- SAM) conducts research on Turkish foreign policy, regional studies and international relations, and makes scholarly and scientific assessments of relevant issues. It is a consultative body of the Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs providing strategic insights, independent data and analysis to decision makers in government. As a nonprofit organization, SAM is chartered by law and has been active since May 1995.
    [Show full text]
  • Jean Gottmann's Atlantic “Transhumance” and The
    Finisterra, XXXIII, 65, 1998, pp. 159-172 JEAN GOTTMANN’S ATLANTIC “TRANSHUMANCE” AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF HIS SPATIAL THEORY LUCA MUSCARÀ 1 “ ...territory, although a very substantial, material, measurable and concrete entity, is the product and indeed the expression of the psychological features of human groups. It is indeed a psychosomatic phenomenon of the community, and as such is replete with inner conflicts and apparent contradictions. ” (GOTTMANN, 1973: 15) Abstract: This paper analyses Gottmann’s spatial model in relation to his complex biography which took place during some of the great historical changes of the 20 th century. In particular, it relates the concept of Megalopolis to his theoretical writings in political geography. The development of the latter ones could not be fully understood without reference to his “transhumance” between the two sides of the Atlantic from 1941 to 1961. Key-words: Gottmann, atlantic transhumance, spatial theory, Megalopolis, political geography. Résumé: LA “T RANSHUMANCE ” A TLANTIQUE DE JEAN GOTTMANN ET LE DEVELOPPEMENT DE SA THEORIE SPATIALE – Cet article analyse le modèle spatial de Jean Gottmann en relation avec sa complexe biographie, tout au long de certains des grands changements du XX e siècle. Nous développons, en particulier, la relation entre le concept de Mégalopolis et ses écrits théoriques en géographie politique. Le développement de la pensée de Gottmann doit prendre en compte, pour être compris, sa “transhumance” entre les deux côtés de l’Atlantique qui a eu lieu de 1941 à 1961. Mots-clés: Gottmann, transhumance atlantique, théorie spatiale, Megalopolis, géographie politique. Resumo: A “ TRANSUMÂNCIA ” ATLÂNTICA DE JEAN GOTTMAN E O DESENVOLVIMENTO DA SUA TEORIA ESPACIAL – Este artigo analisa o modelo espacial de Jean Gottman, relacionando-o com a 1 University of Trieste.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Ideas of Derviş Vahdeti As Reflected in Volkan Newspaper (1908-1909)
    THE POLITICAL IDEAS OF DERVİŞ VAHDETİ AS REFLECTED IN VOLKAN NEWSPAPER (1908-1909) by TALHA MURAT Submitted to the Graduate School of Social Sciences in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Sabancı University AUGUST 2020 THE POLITICAL IDEAS OF DERVİŞ VAHDETİ AS REFLECTED IN VOLKAN NEWSPAPER (1908-1909) Approved by: Assoc. Prof. Selçuk Akşin Somel . (Thesis Supervisor) Assist. Prof. Ayşe Ozil . Assist. Prof. Fatih Bayram . Date of Approval: August 10, 2020 TALHA MURAT 2020 c All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT THE POLITICAL IDEAS OF DERVİŞ VAHDETİ AS REFLECTED IN VOLKAN NEWSPAPER (1908-1909) TALHA MURAT TURKISH STUDIES M.A. THESIS, AUGUST 2020 Thesis Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Selçuk Akşin Somel Keywords: Derviş Vahdeti, Volkan, Pan-Islamism, Ottomanism, Political Islam The aim of this study is to reveal and explore the political ideas of Derviş Vahdeti (1870-1909) who was an important and controversial actor during the first months of the Second Constitutional Period (1908-1918). Starting from 11 December 1908, Vahdeti edited a daily newspaper, named Volkan (Volcano), until 20 April 1909. He personally published a number of writings in Volkan, and expressed his ideas on multiple subjects ranging from politics to the social life in the Ottoman Empire. His harsh criticism that targeted the policies of the Ottoman Committee of Progress and Union (CUP, Osmanlı İttihâd ve Terakki Cemiyeti) made him a serious threat for the authority of the CUP. Vahdeti later established an activist and religion- oriented party, named Muhammadan Union (İttihâd-ı Muhammedi). Although he was subject to a number of studies on the Second Constitutional Period due to his alleged role in the 31 March Incident of 1909, his ideas were mostly ignored and/or he was labelled as a religious extremist (mürteci).
    [Show full text]
  • About Bulgaria
    Source: Zone Bulgaria (http://en.zonebulgaria.com/) About Bulgaria General Information about Bulgaria Bulgaria is a country in Southeastern Europe and is situated on the Balkan Peninsula. To the north the country borders Rumania, to the east – the Black Sea, to the south – Turkey and Greece, and to the west – Yugoslavia and Macedonia. Bulgaria is a parliamentary republic with a National Assembly (One House Parliament) of 240 national representatives. The President is Head of State. Geography of Bulgaria The Republic of Bulgaria covers a territory of 110 993 square kilometres. The average altitude of the country is 470 metres above sea level. The Stara Planina Mountain occupies central position and serves as a natural dividing line from the west to the east. It is a 750 km long mountain range stretching from the Vrushka Chuka Pass to Cape Emine and is part of the Alpine-Himalayan mountain range. It reaches the Black Sea to the east and turns to the north along the Bulgarian-Yugoslavian border. A natural boundary with Romania is the Danube River, which is navigable all along for cargo and passenger vessels. The Black Sea is the natural eastern border of Bulgaria and its coastline is 378 km long. There are clearly cut bays, the biggest two being those of Varna and Bourgas. About 25% of the coastline are covered with sand and hosts our seaside resorts. The southern part of Bulgaria is mainly mountainous. The highest mountain is Rila with Mt. Moussala being the highest peak on the Balkan Peninsula (2925 m). The second highest and the mountain of most alpine character in Bulgaria is Pirin with its highest Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • SABATAYCILIK SALTANATI VE MEŞHUR DÖNMELER - Milli Çözüm Dergisi
    SABATAYCILIK SALTANATI VE MEŞHUR DÖNMELER - Milli Çözüm Dergisi Yazar Milli Çözüm Dergisi 26 Temmuz 2012 Birçok internet sitesinde yıllardır yayınlandığı ve hiç kimsenin yalanlama ihtiyacı duymadığı,“Sabataist Müslüman görünümlü gizli Yahudi”leri, tekrar gündeme getirmek, asılsız iddia ve iftiralar varsa, ilgililere bunları düzeltme imkanı vermek; ve şahısları deşifre edip hedef göstermek gibi bayağı ve aşağı bir fesatlıktan uzak; ülkemizin, devletimizin ve milletimizin muhatap olduğu bir tehdide dikkat çekmek üzere bu konuya değinmeyi münasip gördük. Bilinen bazı “Selanik Dönmeleri” (“Sabataycılar” veya “Gizli Yahudiler”) Bu listenin dayandığı kaynak: ( http://www.sabetay.50g.com/Liste/liste.html ) internette bulduğum en geniş DÖNME listesiydi. Fakat 28 Şubat’ın (1997) meşhur isimlerini bu listede göremedim: Org. Çevik Bir (28 Şubatın mimarlarından), Güven Erkaya Deniz Komutanı (28 Şubatın mimarlarından), Kemal Gürüz YÖK Başkanı, Prof. Kemal Alemdaroğlu İ.Ü Eski Rektörü, Prof. Nur Sertel gibilerinin de Sebataist olduğu belirtilmekteydi. 28 Şubat sonrasına dikkat edelim. Ordu’dan en çok İRTİCACI subay ve öğrenci atılması 28 Şubat’ın ilk yıllarında gözlendi, Üniversiteler İRTİCACI’lardan temizlendi. Daha evvelden imam hatiplerde, üniversitelerde başörtüsü ile okunabilirken, bu tarihten sonra bu hak engellendi. İmam Hatiplerin pratikte önü kesildi. Yükselen Anadolu sermayesinin önü kesildi. (Cüneyt Ülsever’e göre, 28 Şubatın asıl sebebi bu sermaye meselesiymiş). 28 Şubatın planları Deniz Kuvvetlerinin Gölcük’teki merkezinde yapıldı deniyor. Bu merkez 1999 Gölcük depreminde denize gömüldü. Rasathaneden Prof. Işıkara depremin merkez üssünün “tam deniz kuvvetleri merkezi” olduğunu söylemişti. Yakın geçmişteki bir Genel Kurmay Başkanımızın dönme olduğu vurgulanıyor. 2-3 defa nüfus kütüğünü bir şehirden başka şehre taşıdığı, izini kaybettirmek için yaptığı söyleniyor. “Türkler 1.500.000 ermeni öldürdü” deyip, derhal Nobel’i alan Orhan Pamuk’u da unutmamak gerekiyor.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel and Turkey: from Covert to Overt Relations
    Israel and Turkey: From Covert to Overt Relations by Jacob Abadi INTRODUCTION Diplomatic relations between Israel and Turkey have existed since the Jewish state came into being in 1948, however, they have remained covert until recently. Contacts between the two countries have continued despite Turkey's condemnation of Israel in the UN and other official bodies. Frequent statements made by Turkish officials regarding the Arab-Israeli conflict and the Palestinian dilemma give the impression that Turco-Israeli relations have been far more hostile than is actually the case. Such an image is quite misleading, for throughout the years political, commercial, cultural and even military contacts have been maintained between the two countries. The purpose of this article is to show the extent of cooperation between the two countries and to demonstrate how domestic as well as external constraints have affected the diplomatic ties between them. It will be argued that during the first forty years of Israel's existence relations between the two countries remained cordial. Both sides kept a low profile and did not reveal the nature of these ties. It was only toward the end of the 1980s, when the international political climate underwent a major upheaval, that the ties between the two countries became official and overt. Whereas relations with Israel constituted a major problem in Turkish diplomacy, Israeli foreign policy was relatively free from hesitations and constraints. For Israeli foreign policy makers it was always desirable to establish normal relations with Turkey, whose location on the periphery of the Middle East gave it great strategic importance.
    [Show full text]
  • Dealing with a Rising Power
    Dealing with a Rising Power: Turkey’s Transformation and its Implications for the EU Svante Cornell, Gerald Knaus, Manfred Scheich Dealing with a Rising Power: Turkey’s Transformation and its Implications for the EU Dealing with a Rising Power: Turkey’s Transformation and its Implications for the EU Svante Cornell, Gerald Knaus, Manfred Scheich CREDITS Centre for European Studies Cover design: RARO S.L. Layout: Victoria Agency Printed in Belgium by Drukkerij Jo Vandenbulcke Centre for European Studies Rue du Commerce 20 Brussels, BE – 1000 The Centre for European Studies (CES) is the political foundation of the European People’s Party (EPP) dedicated to the promotion of Christian Democrat, conservative and like-minded political values. For more information please visit: www.thinkingeurope.eu This publication receives funding from the European Parliament. © Centre for European Studies 2012 Photos used in this publication: Centre for European Studies 2012 The European Parliament and the Centre for European Studies assume no responsibility for facts or opinions expressed in this publication or their subsequent use. Sole responsibility lies on the author of this publication. 2 Dealing with a Rising Power: Turkey’s Transformation and its Implications for the EU About the CES The Centre for European Studies (CES), established in 2007, is the political foundation of the European People’s Party (EPP). The CES embodies a pan-European mindset, promoting Christian Democrat, conservative and like-minded political values. It serves as a framework for national political foundations linked to member parties of the EPP, with 25 foundations currently members. The CES takes part in the preparation of EPP political platforms and programmes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Significance of Territory
    Interfaces – Thinkers’ Corner Geogr. Helv., 68, 65–68, 2013 www.geogr-helv.net/68/65/2013/ doi:10.5194/gh-68-65-2013 © Author(s) 2013. CC Attribution 3.0 License. The Significance of Territory S. Elden Department of Geography, Durham University, Durham, UK Correspondence to: S. Elden ([email protected]) Gottmann, J.: The Significance of Territory, Charlottesville, he called the “transactional city” (1983) or, in an edited text, VA, University of Virginia Press, 169 pp., ISBN: 0-8139- the relation between centre and periphery (1980), though he 0413-7, 1973. was also known for A Geography of Europe (1969b; origi- nally 1950, with multiple editions) and his French textbook Jean Gottmann (1915–1994) was a French geographer, al- Le politique des Etats´ et leur g´eographie (1952; re-edition though he was born in the Ukraine. He was from a Jewish 2007). family, his parents were killed in the 1917 revolution, and The last of these books showcases a perhaps under- he was taken to Paris by his uncle. It was there he earned appreciated side of Gottmann, as a political geographer a doctorate in geography, working with Albert Demangeon (though see Agnew and Muscara,` 2012). The book covers at the Sorbonne. He fled Paris shortly before the Nazi occu- a range of topics that are crucial to that sub-discipline today, pation, living in the south until 1941, and at the end of the including borders and frontiers, natural resources, the rela- war returned to Paris to work with Pierre Mendes-France` in tion between international relations and geography and the the French government, before being sent back to New York role of international organisations.
    [Show full text]
  • Formation of Watersides on the Bosporus and Spatial Development of Bosporus Waterside Gardens
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTROINCS; MECHANICAL and MECHATRONICS ENGINEERING Vol.3 Num 2 pp.(571-577) FORMATION OF WATERSIDES ON THE BOSPORUS AND SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT OF BOSPORUS WATERSIDE GARDENS Petek JAWDET ABDULLA Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture, Istanbul Aydin University, Florya, Istanbul/Turkey E-mail: [email protected] Abstract- As one of the unique beauties of Bosporus, Bosporus watersides have been composed and formed through long ages along the Bosporus. Not only an architectural form and a residential type, the Bosporus watersides also were being a part of the culture in which they were built. They project the life traditions of the ages in which they were built. Their users were using those buildings as summer resorts, comprised of a hall, wide rooms, kitchen and other components. The gardens of the watersides also have had their own characteristics, and they were setting out unique beauties. The gardens of the watersides in Bosporus were beyond comparison by their organizational schemes and landscape designs. The watersides were designed with a garden within the bounds of spatial possibilities. The gardens were decorated with colorful flowery plants. Many watersides, which were built in Bosporus, have reached until today. As a type of residences, these buildings are among the most important buildings of Bosporus. The Bosporus watersides have unique architectural samples and features and they need to be well preserved. However, it has been identified that some of those structures have disappeared in time. There are many causes for such a removal. By analyzing these causes, we need to preserve these buildings better nowadays. Bosporus watersides and their gardens today need a better protection by effective policies to be produced.
    [Show full text]
  • Vahdcttifl Hflin Mİ? K Ffilr Fm MI?
    VAHDCTTIfl Hflin Mİ? K ffilR fM MI? ♦ ---------------------- MEHMET BİCİK MEHMET BICIK Eğitimci, Araştırmacı-Yazar, Şâir... 25 Mart 1975'te Balıkesir'in Bigadiç ilçesinin Kırca Köyü'nde dünyaya geldi. İlkokulu köyünde, ortaokulu Şamlı ve Ilıca'da, liseyi de Balıkesir'de okudu. Konya'da başladığı yüksek öğreni­ mini Gaziantep'te sürdürdü. 1996'da İstanbul Üniversitesi Ede- biyat Fakültesi Tarih Bölümünden mezun oldu... İlk görev yeri olan Giresun Şebinkarahisar Lisesi'nde 1996- 2000 yılları arasında Tarih öğretmeni olarak çalıştı. 259. K. D. Er olarak Malatya 2. Ordu Komutanlığı'na bağlı Ulaştırma Er Eğitim Alayında vatani görevini yaptı(1997T998). 2000-2001 eğitim-öğretim yılında Balıkesir Sındırgı Büyükdağdere İlköğre­ tim Okulu'nda görev yaptı. 2001 Kasımında Balıkesir Burhaniye Lisesi'ne tayin oldu. 1 Ağustos 2006'dan itibaren Burhaniye Li- sesi'nde Müdür Yardımcısı olarak görev yapan Bicik, 2008 yılı Ağustos ayında Burhaniye Öğretmenevi ve Akşam Sanat Oku- lu'na atandı. Hâlen Burhaniye Öğretmenevi ve Akşam Sanat Okulu'nda Müdür Vekili olarak görev yapıyor. Tarih ve Folklor üzerine araştırmalar yapan, değişik temalarda şiirler yazan Bicik'in, Türk Dünyası Tarih Dergisi, Türk Dünyası Araştırmaları, Türk Edebiyatı, Yesevî, Yeni DeFne, Genç Akademi ve Genç Gelişim dergilerinde yazılan ve şiirleri yayınlandı. Bicik, mahallî Gaziantep HedeF Gazetesi'nde köşe yazıları yazdı. ESERLERİ: Derleme : Bigadiç Güzellemesi (1996) Şiir : Bir Sevdâ Uğruna (2003) Araştırma : Meşhurların Vasiyetleri (Akis Kitap-2006) Bilinmeyen Yönleriyle II. Abdülhamid (Akis Kitap-2008) İÇİNDEKİLER 1. Sultan Vahdettin Garip Doğdu, Garip mi Öldü?.....................................................................15 2. Sultan Vahdettin'in İlk Aşkı Kimdi? Sultan Vahdettin'in Kaç Eşi Vardı? Kaç Çocuğu Vardı?..............................................................................................................................18 3. Vahdettin'in Kızları Piyano mu Çalıyordu? Vahdettin'in Şehzadelerinin ve Sultanlarının Diploma Töreni Neden Yapılamadı?.
    [Show full text]
  • Who's Who in Politics in Turkey
    WHO’S WHO IN POLITICS IN TURKEY Sarıdemir Mah. Ragıp Gümüşpala Cad. No: 10 34134 Eminönü/İstanbul Tel: (0212) 522 02 02 - Faks: (0212) 513 54 00 www.tarihvakfi.org.tr - [email protected] © Tarih Vakfı Yayınları, 2019 WHO’S WHO IN POLITICS IN TURKEY PROJECT Project Coordinators İsmet Akça, Barış Alp Özden Editors İsmet Akça, Barış Alp Özden Authors Süreyya Algül, Aslı Aydemir, Gökhan Demir, Ali Yalçın Göymen, Erhan Keleşoğlu, Canan Özbey, Baran Alp Uncu Translation Bilge Güler Proofreading in English Mark David Wyers Book Design Aşkın Yücel Seçkin Cover Design Aşkın Yücel Seçkin Printing Yıkılmazlar Basın Yayın Prom. ve Kağıt San. Tic. Ltd. Şti. Evren Mahallesi, Gülbahar Cd. 62/C, 34212 Bağcılar/İstanbull Tel: (0212) 630 64 73 Registered Publisher: 12102 Registered Printer: 11965 First Edition: İstanbul, 2019 ISBN Who’s Who in Politics in Turkey Project has been carried out with the coordination by the History Foundation and the contribution of Heinrich Böll Foundation Turkey Representation. WHO’S WHO IN POLITICS IN TURKEY —EDITORS İSMET AKÇA - BARIŞ ALP ÖZDEN AUTHORS SÜREYYA ALGÜL - ASLI AYDEMİR - GÖKHAN DEMİR ALİ YALÇIN GÖYMEN - ERHAN KELEŞOĞLU CANAN ÖZBEY - BARAN ALP UNCU TARİH VAKFI YAYINLARI Table of Contents i Foreword 1 Abdi İpekçi 3 Abdülkadir Aksu 6 Abdullah Çatlı 8 Abdullah Gül 11 Abdullah Öcalan 14 Abdüllatif Şener 16 Adnan Menderes 19 Ahmet Altan 21 Ahmet Davutoğlu 24 Ahmet Necdet Sezer 26 Ahmet Şık 28 Ahmet Taner Kışlalı 30 Ahmet Türk 32 Akın Birdal 34 Alaattin Çakıcı 36 Ali Babacan 38 Alparslan Türkeş 41 Arzu Çerkezoğlu
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Creating Turkishness: an Examination of Turkish Nationalism Through Gök-Börü Güldeniz Kibris Sabanci University Spring 20
    CREATING TURKISHNESS: AN EXAMINATION OF TURKISH NATIONALISM THROUGH GÖK-BÖRÜ GÜLDEN İZ KIBRIS SABANCI UNIVERSITY SPRING 2005 1 CREATING TURKISHNESS: AN EXAMINATION OF TURKISH NATIONALISM THROUGH GÖK-BÖRÜ By GÜLDEN İZ KIBRIS Submitted to the Graduate School of Arts and Social Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Sabanci University Spring 2005 2 CREATING TURKISHNESS: AN EXAMINATION OF TURKISH NATIONALISM THROUGH GÖK-BÖRÜ APPROVED BY: Assoc. Prof. Halil Berktay (Thesis Supervisor) ........................................................ Asst. Prof. Y. Hakan Erdem ....................................................... Asst. Prof. E. Burak Arıkan ......................................................... DATE OF APPROVAL: 12 August 2005 3 © GÜLDEN İZ KIBRIS 2005 All Rights Reserved 4 Abstract CREATING TURKISHNESS: AN EXAMINATION OF TURKISH NATIONALISM THROUGH GÖK-BÖRÜ Güldeniz Kıbrıs History, M.A. Thesis Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Halil Berktay 2005, ix + 113 pages This M.A. thesis attempts to exhibit the cross-fertilization between the Pan- Turkist and Kemalist varieties of Turkish nationalism through their definitions of ‘Turkishness.’ In the same vein with contemporary nationalisms, the late Ottoman/Republican nationalist elite created ‘Turkishness’ by referring to a mythical past. In that creation process, the Pan-Turkist and Kemalist nationalist discourses historically developed in the same pool and used similar intellectual sources. Though their ultimate goals were different, the two varieties scrutinized very similar racist and nationalist references in their imaginations of Turkish identity as racially superior. In the name of revealing the similarities and differences, a Pan-Turkist journal, Gök-Börü [Grey Wolf] has been examined. Published and edited by Reha Oğuz Türkkan, the journal appeared between 1942 and 1943 as a byproduct of the special aggressive international environment.
    [Show full text]