DOCSLIB.ORG

Bibliography

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bibliography BIBLIOGRAPHY Allan, Keith. 1977. ‘Classifiers’, Language 53: 285–311. Benedict, Paul King (Contributing Editor: James Alan Matisoff ). 1972. Sino-Tibetan: A Conspectus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Bhattacharya, Promod Chandra. 1977. A Descriptive Analysis of Boro. Gauhati: Guwahati University, Department of Publication. Bauer, Laurie. 1983. English Word-formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Bhat, D.N. Shankara. 1968. Boro Vocabulary (With a Grammatical Sketch). Poona: Deccan College Post-Graduate and Research Institute. Blake, Barry J. 1994. Case. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Bradley, David. 1994. ‘The subgrouping of Tibeto-Burman’, pp. 59–78 in Hajime Kitamura, Tatsuo Nishida and Yasuhiko Nagano (eds.) Current Issues in Sino-Tibetan Linguistics. Osaka: The organizing Committee, The 26th International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics. Breton, Roland J.-L. 1977. Atlas of the Languages and Ethnic Communities of South Asia. New Delhi: Sage Publications. Burling, Robbins. 1959. ‘Proto-Bodo’, Language ( Journal of the Linguistic Society of America) 35: 433–453. ——. 1961. A Garo Grammar. Poona: Deccan College Post-Graduate and Research Institute. ——. 1981. ‘Garo spelling and Garo phonology’, Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 6 (1): 61–81. ——. 1983. ‘The Sal languages’, Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 7 (2): 1–31. ——. 1984. ‘Noun compounding in Garo’, Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 8 (1): 14–42. ——. 1992. ‘Garo as a minimal tone language’, Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 15 (2): 33–51. Burton-Page, J. 1955. ‘An analysis of the syllable in Boro’, Indian Linguistics ( Journal of the Linguistic Society of India, incorporating the Indian Philological Association) 16: 334–344. Comrie, Bernard. 1985. Tense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Dalton, Edward Tuite. 1872. Descriptive Ethnography of Bengal. Calcutta: Office of the Superintendent of Government Printing. (1960 reprinted by Indian Studies: Past and Present) Damant, G.H. 1880. ‘Notes on the locality and population of the tribes dwelling between the Brahmaputra and Ningthi rivers’, Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland 12: 228–258. Duanmu, San. 1994. ‘The phonology of the glottal stop in Garo’, Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 17 (2): 69–82. Egerod, Sφren Christian. 1980 (first published 1974). ‘Sino-Tibetan languages’, The New Encyclopaedia Britannica 16: 796–806. Fox, Anthony. 1995. Linguistic Reconstruction, An Introduction to Theory and Method. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Grierson, George Abraham 1903. Linguistic Survey of India vol. III, part II. Calcutta: Superintendent of Government Printing, India. ——. 1927. Linguistic Survey of India vol. I, part I. Calcutta: Superintendent of Government Printing, India. Hale, Austin. 1982. Research on Tibeto-Burman Languages. Berlin: Mouton Publishers. Halvorsrud, H. 1959. A Short Grammar of the Boro Language. Goalpara: The Boro Literature Board. 858 bibliography Hopper, Paul. J. and Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Jones, Robert B. 1970. ‘Classifier constructions in southeast Asia’, Journal of the American Oriental Society 90 (1): 1–12. Kelkar, Ashok R. 1978. ‘Correlative linguistics’, pp. 151–188 in McCormack, William C. and Stephen A. Wurn (eds.) Approaches to Language (Anthropological Issues). The Hague: Mouton Publishers. Lass, Roger. 1984. Phonology: An introduction to basic concepts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Marak, H.W. 1975. Kubidik: A Garo-English-Assamese Dictionary. Gauhati: Assam Academy for Cultural Relations. Matthews, P.H. 1981. Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ——. 1993. Morphology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Mochari, Moniram. 1985. Bodo-English Dictionary. Bengtol: The Bodo Catholic Youth Association. ——. 1977. Boro Self Teaching. (published by the author). Palmer, F.R. 1986. Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ——. 1994. Grammatical Roles and Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pe, Hla. 1965. ‘A re-examination of Burmese “classifiers”’, Lingua 15: 163–185. Playfair, Major Alan 1909. The Garos. London: David Nutt. Pulgram, Ernst. 1970. Syllable, Word, Nexus, Cursus. The Hague: Mouton & Co. N.V., Publishers. Rongkho, Listi Rabha. 1995. ‘The Rabhas at a glance’, in Smrithi Granth (Dodan Mela Silver Jubilee). Baida (Goalpara): Dodan Than Committee. Rabha, Rajen. 1982. Rabha Sobba-Sombhar. Jorhat: Asam Sahitya Sabha. Robinson, William. 1849. ‘Notes on the languages spoken by the various tribes inhabiting the valley of Assam and its mountain confines’, Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Bengal 18: 185–237. Shafer, Robert. 1953. ‘Classification of the northernmost Naga languages’, The Journal of the Bihar Research Society 39 (3): 225–264. ——. 1966–1974. Introduction to Sino-Tibetan (5 parts). Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz. Voegelin, Charles Frederick and Florence Marie Robinett Voegelin. 1977. Classification and Index of the World’s Languages (Foundation of Linguistics Series). New York: Elsevier North-Holland, Inc. Waddel, L.A. 1900. ‘The tribes of the Brahmaputra valley’, ‘The Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal 69 (III): 1–113. Weidert, Alfons. 1979. ‘The Sino-Tibetan tonogenetic laryngeal reconstruction the- ory’, Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 5 (1): 49–127. ——. 1987. Tibet-Burman Tonology (A Comparative Account). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Wilson, H.H. 1961. Sanskrit Grammar. Varanasi: Chowkhamba Sanskrit Series Office. Wolfenden, Stuart N. 1929. ‘Notes on the tribal name pBARA Fi-SA’, Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 81: 581–83. ——. 1929. ‘A further note on BARA Fi-SA’, Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 81: 869–870. ——. 1929. Outlines of Tibeto-Burman Linguistic Morphology. London: The Royal Asiatic Society..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • History of the Scientific Study of the Tibeto-Burman Languages of North-East India
    Indian Journal of History of Science, 52.4 (2017) 420-444 DOI: 10.16943/ijhs/2017/v52i4/49265 History of the Scientific Study of the Tibeto-Burman Languages of North-East India Satarupa Dattamajumdar* (Received 25 April 2017; revised 19 October 2017) Abstract Linguistics or in other words the scientific study of languages in India is a traditional exercise which is about three thousand years old and occupied a central position of the scientific tradition from the very beginning. The tradition of the scientific study of the languages of the Indo-Aryan language family which are mainly spoken in India’s North and North-Western part was brought to light with the emergence of the genealogical study of languages by Sir William Jones in the 18th c. But the linguistic study of the Tibeto-Burman languages spoken in North-Eastern part of India is of a much later origin. According to the 2011 census there are 45486784 people inhabiting in the states of North-East India. They are essentially the speakers of the Tibeto-Burman group of languages along with the Austro-Asiatic and Indo-Aryan groups of languages. Though 1% of the total population of India is the speaker of the Tibeto-Burman group of languages (2001 census) the study of the language and society of this group of people has become essential from the point of view of the socio-political development of the country. But a composite historical account of the scientific enquiries of the Tibeto-Burman group of languages, a prerequisite criterion for the development of the region is yet to be attempted.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (4MB)
    North East Indian Linguistics Volume 3 Edited by Gwendolyn Hyslop • Stephen Morey. Mark W. Post EOUNDATlON® S (j) ® Ie S Delhi· Bengaluru • Mumbai • Kolkata • Chennai • Hyderabad • Pune Published by Cambridge University Press India Pvt. Ltd. under the imprint of Foundation Books Cambridge House, 438114 Ansari Road, Daryaganj, New Delhi 110002 Cambridge University Press India Pvt. Ltd. C-22, C-Block, Brigade M.M., K.R. Road, Iayanagar, Bengaluru 560 070 Plot No. 80, Service Industries, Sbirvane, Sector-I, Neru!, Navi Mumbai 400 706 10 Raja Subodb Mullick Square, 2nd Floor, Kolkata 700 013 2111 (New No. 49), 1st Floor, Model School Road, Thousand Lights, Chcnnai 600 006 House No. 3-5-874/6/4, (Near Apollo Hospital), Hyderguda, Hyderabad 500 029 Agarwal Pride, 'A' Wing, 1308 Kasba Peth, Near Surya Hospital, :"Pune 411 011 © Cambridge Universiry Press India Pvt. Ltd. First Published 20 II ISBN 978-81-7596-793-9 All rights reserved. No reproduction of any part may take place without the written pennission of Cambridge University Press India Pvl. Ltd., subject to statutory exception and to the provision of relevant collective licensing agreements. Cambridge" Universiry Press India Pvl. Ltd. has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of URLs for external or third-parry internet websites referred to in this book, and does not guarantee that any content on such websites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate. Typeset at SanchauLi Image Composers, New Deihi. Published by Manas Saikia for Cambridge University Press India Pvl. Ltd. and printed at Sanat Printers, Kundli. Haryana Contents About the Contributors v Foreword Chungkham Yashawanta Singh ix A Note from the Editors xvii The View from Manipur 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Arunachal Pradesh: a Paradise for a Linguist Dr
    JOURNAL OF ASIAN ARTS, CULTURE AND LITERATURE (JAACL) VOL 1, NO 2: JUNE 2020 Arunachal Pradesh: A Paradise for a Linguist Dr. Bishakha Das [email protected] Abstract Arunachal Pradesh is a paradise for the linguist. The state is a reservoir of numerous ethnic and linguistic communities, some of which extend their fraternity to Tibet, Bhutan and Myanmar. The state is home to variegated tongues of the broader Tibeto-Burman family, although the grouping may not be all inclusive. Past records of allocation of space and reorganization of districts provide a comprehensive account of the sister languages and community settlements. The place names indicate the original settlers and the prominent community. The speakers’ identification may not match their linguistic affiliation owing to political and administrative factors. English is the official language, and Hindi and Assamese are the lingua franca of the state. The state is a paradise for diverse indigenous communities with 32-34 languages1. Three scripts are used in the state – Tai-Khamti, Wancho, and Bhoti/ classical Tibetan; the other communities write in Roman or Devnagari script. Introduction Arunachal Pradesh, the largest of the seven sister states of North-East India, is bounded by the mighty Himalayas and the undulating slopes of the Patkai ranges. The mountains are interwoven with the mighty river Brahmaputra and its tributaries Siang, Lohit, Subansiri and Kameng. The state is bounded by Bhutan in the west, Tibet in the north, Burma (Myanmar) in the east; and the Indian states of Assam and Nagaland in the south. The variegated linguistic and ethnic communities maintain a continuum across its international borders.
    [Show full text]
  • Existential Quantification in Tiwa
    Existential quantification in Tiwa: disjunction and indefinites by Virginia Ellen Dawson A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Amy Rose Deal, Chair Professor Line Mikkelsen Professor Peter Jenks Professor Seth Yalcin Summer 2020 Existential quantification in Tiwa: disjunction and indefinites Copyright 2020 by Virginia Ellen Dawson 1 Abstract Existential quantification in Tiwa: disjunction and indefinites by Virginia Ellen Dawson Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics University of California, Berkeley Professor Amy Rose Deal, Chair This dissertation examines the semantics and pragmatics of disjunction and indefinites in Tiwa, an understudied Tibeto-Burman language of northeast India. The core focus of the dis- sertation concerns cross-linguistic variation and its implications for semantic theory. Broadly, I address the extent to which languages encode similar meanings through the same semantic means; what mechanisms are best suited to model those meanings; and how the theory can best model what cross-linguistic variation we do find. Concretely, I provide novel cross- linguistic evidence from phrasal comparatives that disjunction is alternative-denoting, and argue that languages can employ different semantic mechanisms in deriving exceptional wide scope. Tiwa's large system of indefinites and disjunction particles, which are in part morphologi- cally related, provide an ideal subject for exploring the logical connection between disjunction and indefinites (which amount to existential quantification over explicit and non-explicit do- mains respectively). While cross-linguistic studies of indefinites have seen an increase in recent years, disjunction has not received the same level of attention.
    [Show full text]
  • Papers in Southeast Asian Linguistics No. 14: Tibeto-Bvrman Languages of the Himalayas
    PACIFIC LINGUISTICS Series A-86 PAPERS IN SOUTHEAST ASIAN LINGUISTICS NO. 14: TIBETO-BVRMAN LANGUAGES OF THE HIMALAYAS edited by David Bradley Department of Linguistics Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY Bradley, D. editor. Papers in Southeast Asian Linguistics No. 14:. A-86, vi + 232 (incl. 4 maps) pages. Pacific Linguistics, The Australian National University, 1997. DOI:10.15144/PL-A86.cover ©1997 Pacific Linguistics and/or the author(s). Online edition licensed 2015 CC BY-SA 4.0, with permission of PL. A sealang.net/CRCL initiative. Pacific Linguistics specialises in publishing linguistic material relating to languages of East Asia, Southeast Asia and the Pacific. Linguistic and anthropological manuscripts related to other areas, and to general theoretical issues, are also considered on a case by case basis. Manuscripts are published in one of four series: SERIES A: Occasional Papers SERIES C: Books SERIES B: Monographs SERIES D: Special Publications FOUNDING EDITOR: S.A. Wurm EDITORIAL BOARD: M.D. Ross and D.T. Tryon (Managing Editors), T.E. Dutton, N.P. Himmelmann, A.K. Pawley EDITORIAL ADVISERS: B.W. Bender KA. McElhanon University of Hawaii Summer Institute of Linguistics David Bradley H.P. McKaughan La Trobe University University of Hawaii Michael G. Clyne P. Miihlhausler Monash University Universityof Adelaide S.H. Elbert G.N. O'Grady University of Hawaii University of Victoria, B.C. K.J. Franklin KL. Pike Summer Institute of Linguistics Summer Institute of Linguistics W.W.Glover E.C. Polome Summer Institute of Linguistics University of Texas G.W.Grace Gillian Sankoff University of Hawaii University of Pennsylvania M.A.K.
    [Show full text]
  • AN INITIAL RECONSTRUCTION of PROTO-BORO-GARO by DANIEL
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by University of Oregon Scholars' Bank AN INITIAL RECONSTRUCTION OF PROTO-BORO-GARO by DANIEL CODY WOOD A THESIS Presented to the Department ofLinguistics and the Graduate School ofthe University ofOregon in partial fulfillment ofthe requirements for the degree of Master ofArts December 2008 11 "An Initial Reconstruction ofProto-Boro-Garo," a thesis prepared by Daniel Wood in partial fulfillment ofthe requirements for the Master ofArts degree in the Department of Linguistics. This thesis has been approved and accepted by: Dr. Scott DeLancey, Chair ofthe Examining Committee Date Committee in Charge: Dr. Scott DeLancey, Chair Dr. Spike Gildea Accepted by: Dean ofthe Graduate School 111 © 2008 Daniel Wood IV An Abstract ofthe Thesis of Daniel Cody Wood for the degree of Master ofArts in the Department ofLinguistics to be taken December 2008 Title: AN INITIAL RECONSTRUCTION OF PROTO-BORO-GARO This manuscript has been approved by the advisor and committee named . below and by Richard Linton, Dean of the Graduate School. - .-----.-------------- Dr. Scott DeLancey \ This study attempts to reconstruct Proto-Boro-Garo (PBG), the ancient language from which the modern Boro-Garo (BG) family evolved. BG is a largely under- documented sub-branch ofTibeto-Burman that is spoken primarily in the Brahmaputra valley ofnortheastern India. While other comparative studies have focused on PBG phonology, this study concentrates on grammatical elements and syntactic structures. An initial reconstruction is attained by examining data from the limited number of descriptive grammars available on BG languages and using the comparative method to determine the oldest forms ofgrammatical elements.
    [Show full text]
  • Rabha (Joseph).Pdf
    RABHA BRILL’S TIBETAN STUDIES LIBRARY edited by HENK BLEZER ALEX MCKAY CHARLES RAMBLE LANGUAGES OF THE GREATER HIMALAYAN REGION edited by GEORGE L. VAN DRIEM VOLUME 5/1 RABHA BY U.V. JOSEPH LEIDEN • BOSTON 2007 This book was published with financial support from the International Institute for Asian Studies (IIAS), Leiden, the Netherlands. This book is printed on acid-free paper. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A C.I.P. record for this book is available from the Library of Congress. ISSN 1568-6183 ISBN-10: 90 04 13321 6 ISBN-13: 978 90 04 13321 1 © Copyright 2007 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands Koninklijke Brill NV incorporates the imprints Brill, Hotei Publishing, IDC Publishers, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers and VSP. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use is granted by Brill provided that the appropriate fees are paid directly to The Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Suite 910 Danvers MA 01923, USA. Fees are subject to change. printed in the netherlands CONTENTS Acknowledgements .................................................................... xvii List of Tables ............................................................................ xix List of Figures .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Existential Quantification in Tiwa
    Existential quantification in Tiwa: disjunction and indefinites by Virginia Ellen Dawson A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Amy Rose Deal, Chair Professor Line Mikkelsen Professor Peter Jenks Professor Seth Yalcin Summer 2020 Existential quantification in Tiwa: disjunction and indefinites Copyright 2020 by Virginia Ellen Dawson 1 Abstract Existential quantification in Tiwa: disjunction and indefinites by Virginia Ellen Dawson Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics University of California, Berkeley Professor Amy Rose Deal, Chair This dissertation examines the semantics and pragmatics of disjunction and indefinites in Tiwa, an understudied Tibeto-Burman language of northeast India. The core focus of the dis- sertation concerns cross-linguistic variation and its implications for semantic theory. Broadly, I address the extent to which languages encode similar meanings through the same semantic means; what mechanisms are best suited to model those meanings; and how the theory can best model what cross-linguistic variation we do find. Concretely, I provide novel cross- linguistic evidence from phrasal comparatives that disjunction is alternative-denoting, and argue that languages can employ different semantic mechanisms in deriving exceptional wide scope. Tiwa's large system of indefinites and disjunction particles, which are in part morphologi- cally related, provide an ideal subject for exploring the logical connection between disjunction and indefinites (which amount to existential quantification over explicit and non-explicit do- mains respectively). While cross-linguistic studies of indefinites have seen an increase in recent years, disjunction has not received the same level of attention.
    [Show full text]
  • A Historical-Comparative Study of the Tani (Mirish) Branch in Tibeto-Burman
    A Historical-Comparative Study of the Tani (Mirish) Branch in Tibeto-Burman t y Tianshin Jackson Sun B.A. (National Taiwan Normal University) 1979 MA. (National Taiwan Normal University) 1982 M A. (University of California at Berkeley) 1990 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics in the GRADUATE DIVISION of the UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA a t BERKELEY Committee in charge: Professor James A Matisoff, Chair Professor Ting Pang-hsin Professor Gary Holland 1993 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. The dissertation of Tianshin Jackson Sun is approved: >/, ///3 Chair I I Date J ZlaM j ff. tkU os*o t _____________ AftAxk 7.*), /99J Date Date University of California at Berkeley 1993 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Table of Contents M aps .......................................................................................................................vii Acknowledgements ...............................................................................................x Chapter I. Introduction ................................................................................ 1 1.0. Preliminaries ............................................................................................1 1.0.1. Objectives and Limitations ......................................................1 1.0.2. Why a New Name? ....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A New Theory on the Origin of Chinese
    A NEW THEORY ON THE ORIGIN OF CHINESE George van Driem Himalayan Languages Project, Leiden University, 2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands ABSTRACT been less well-studied, like Tibeto-Burman. The history of The first four sections of this paper provide an abridged comparative linguistics is littered with cases in point. The historical synopsis of the main developments in linguistic historical grammar and phonology of Albanian was so thinking about the genetic relationships of Chinese and poorly understood that it was not even recognized as an other languages of eastern Eurasia. The fifth and last sec­ Indo-European language until the time of Rasmus Rask tion relates recent insights in Tibeto-Burman phylogeny to (1834) and Joseph Ritter von Xylander (1835), and this the discoveries of archaeologists in China and neigh­ identification continued to be disputed throughout the bouring countries. The dispersal of Neolithic cultural nineteenth century, e.g. Pott (1887). More obvious cases complexes is shown to correspond to the present-day dis­ can be found in the study of Oriental languages. In the tribution of Tibeto-Burman language communities when second half of the nineteenth century, Max Friedrich viewed in light of the new informed phylogeny. Muller championed a theory of genetic relationship which divided the languages of the Old World into an "Arian", a "Semitic" and a "Turanian" language family, whereby Turanian encompassed all Old World languages which were not Aryan or Semitic. Turanian was named after Turan, the Persian name for Transoxiana, most particu­ LANGUAGE FAMILIES AND ORPHANS larly Turkmenistan, once ruled over by King Tur, the heir The family tree of a language phylum can be represented of Fafidun, a legendary monarch of an ancient people who in several ways.
    [Show full text]
  • Toward a Eurasian Bestiary: (I) OTTER in Tibeto-Burman and Mon-Khmer (II) JACKAL in Sino-Tibetan and Indo-European*
    Toward a Eurasian Bestiary: (I) OTTER in Tibeto-Burman and Mon-Khmer (II) JACKAL in Sino-Tibetan and Indo-European* James A. Matisoff University of California Berkeley PART I: OTTER in Tibeto-Burman and Mon-Khmer I.1 Introduction One of the most interesting zoonyms to be found in Sino-Tibetan: a Conspectus [henceforth STC] is the word for ‘otter’ (#438, p. 107). On the basis of the following 11 forms, Benedict originally reconstructed this etymon as Proto-Tibeto-Burman [PTB] *s-ram , with the initial sibilant analyzed as an instance of the *s- “animal prefix”: 1 Written Tibetan [WT] sram , Lepcha săryom , Miri si-ram , Nung səram , Jingpho [Jg.] shăram , Maru xrɛn, Phunoi sam , Garo matram , Dimasa matham , Lushai (Mizo) sa-hram , Mikir serim . Later, however, he changed his mind, and removed the hyphen from the proto-form ( *sram ), treating the sibilant-plus-liquid combination as a true consonant cluster, with no morpheme boundary intervening. This move was prompted by a reconsideration of Mizo sa-hram and Lepcha săryom , both of which look as if they derive from *sa-sram .2 Yet as Benedict himself realized, this reanalysis does nothing to explain the very strange Written Burmese [WB] word for ‘otter’: phyam . In a footnote (STC, n. 302) he offers a non- explanation without much enthusiasm: “…Burmese has phyam ‘otter’, which can be analyzed as a derivative of *phram < *p- sram , with the p- element of undetermined origin.” This Burmese form certainly “otter” undergo further scrutiny – a theory to account for its mysterious labial onset will be the main focus of the first section of this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • JSEALS Special Publication 2.Pdf
    JSEALS Special Publication No. 2 PaPers from the Chulalongkorn InternatIonal student symPosIum on southeast asIan LinguIstics 2017 Edited by: Pittayawat Pittayaporn Sujinat Jitwiriyanont Pavadee Saisuwan Bhimbasistha Tejarajanya 1 © 2018 University of Hawai’i Press All rights reserved OPEN ACCESS – Semiannual with periodic special publications E-ISSN: 1836-6821 http://hdl.handle.net/10524/52429 Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. JSEALS publishes fully open access content, which means that all articles are available on the internet to all users immediately upon publication. Non-commercial use and distribution in any medium is permitted, provided the author and the journal are properly credited. Cover photo courtesy of Pasuree Luesakul. i JournalJSEALS of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society Editor-in-Chief Mark Alves (Montgomery College, USA) Managing Editors Nathan Hill (University of London, SOAS, UK) Sigrid Lew (Payap University, Thailand) Paul Sidwell (Australia National University, Australia) Editorial Advisory Committee Marc BRUNELLE (University of Ottawa, Canada) Kamil DEEN (University of Hawaii, USA) Gerard DIFFLOTH (Cambodia) Rikker DOCKUM (Yale University, USA) San San HNIN TUN (INCALCO, France) Kitima INDRAMBARYA (Kasetsart University, Thailand) Peter JENKS (UC Berkeley, USA) Mathias JENNY (University of Zurich, Switzerland) Daniel KAUFMAN (Queens College, City University of New York & Endangered Language Alliance, USA) James KIRBY (University of Edinburgh, Scotland) Hsiu-chuan LIAO (National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan) Bradley MCDONNELL (University of Hawai’i at Mānoa, USA) Alexis MICHAUD (CNRS (Le Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), France) Marc MIYAKE (The British Museum) David MORTENSEN (Carnegie Mellon University, USA) Peter NORQUEST (University of Arizona, USA) John D.
    [Show full text]