DOCSLIB.ORG

Redefining Democracy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Bangkok International Student Conference 2019 21 - 22 January 2019 , Faculty of Political Science, Thammasat University, Bangkok, Thailand R E D E F I N I N G DEMOCRACY: THE NEW BATTLE- GROUND PROCEEDINGS Welcome Letter from the Dean of Faculty of Political Science As the Dean of the Faculty of Political Science, Thammasat University, I would like to welcome all of you to the 6th Bangkok International Student Conference. Thammasat University has long been a symbol that promotes the principles of liberty and democracy in Thailand. Also, it is regarded as one of the forefront academic institutions in Thailand. This year, the conference is held under the theme of “Redefning Democracy: The New Battleground”. The theme has responded to the current global situation including that of Thailand where its democracy is a challenging issue. Therefore, in this conference, the participants are strongly encouraged to question, discuss and exchange ideas about the terms and issues related to democracy such as populism and economic development. Moreover, the democratic situation nowadays is the completely different from the past. This is because of the emergence of new platform called “social media” which has tremendous impact on our daily life. Furthermore, social media is considered as a free space where users can enJoy sharing their ideas publicly. This grants political institutions and stakeholders to proJect their messages to attract the mass and raise their popularity. Therefore, the social media can be defned as the “new battleground” for the current political competition aligning with the theme of the conference. Besides the academic part, I hope that all participants enJoy the surrounding environment around the campus. The university is surrounded by many well-known historic places which attract travelers from around the world. I recommend you to grab this chance while you are staying in Bangkok to visit those places. Most importantly, this conference will provide the attention and effort from the BISC staff members in order to convene the conference to the paramount. The organizing committee is prepared to give undivided participation to our utmost important individual participants. I wish you the very best of luck, learn from each other and enJoy the conference. Asst.Prof. Dr.Tavida Kamolvej Dean of Faculty of Political Science Thammasat University A Warm Welcome to All Delegates and Observers! It is our greatest pleasure to welcome you all to the 2019 Bangkok International Student Conference (BISC) here in Bangkok, Thailand. BISC aims to construct a platform for youth engagement while broadening boundaries of knowledge and enhancing youth partnership through academic collaboration. We provide a space where differences in opinion are encouraged and respected, a space where everyone is welcome. This year, we have returned with the theme “Redefning Democracy: A New Battleground.” With varieties of activities prepared, we hope to make your experience at BISC not only an educational one, but also a memorable one. We hope you enjoy your time here and if there is anything you need, feel free to let any of us know at any time. Sincerely, Bangkok International Student Conference Committee BANGKOKINTER N AT I O N A L S T UWHAT D E N T CONFERENCE2019IS BISC ? BANGKOK BANG- Constructing a platform for youth engagement, the broadened boundary of KOKknowledge and enhanced youth INTERNATIONpartnership through academic collaboration. - ALSTUDENTSince 2011, the Bangkok International Student ConferenceCONFER (BISC) has been - launched by the Bachelor of Political Science Programme in Politics and ENCEInternational Relations (BIR Programme)2019 at the ThammasatBANGKOK University. The Faculty of Political Science, Thammasat University, is one of Thailand’s foremost providers of research and higher education. It is also regarded as a INTERNATIONALwell-renowned venue for Thai and international scholars. The Bangkok International Student Conference (BISC) performs as an STUDENTinternational platform providing CONFERENCE exceptional academic opportunities for young enthusiastic students regardless of their felds of studies and nationalities: 2019 To present their academic paper and exchange new perspectives STUDENT To develop outstanding CONFERENCE leadership, communication, and teamwork skills 2019 To establish BANGKOKINTER a network with students around the world N AT I O N A L S T U D E N T CONFERENCE2019 BANGKOK BANG- KOK INTERNATION- ALSTUDENT CONFER- BANGKOKINTER N AT I O N A L S T U D E N T “An annual academic activities CONFERENCE2019that gathering student from various universities, regions, and nationalities BANGKOKaround the world” BANG- KOK In the previous year, the BISCINTERNATION 2018 successfully portrayed the theme of - “One Belt One Road: Path to Comprehensive Regional Development (?)” ALSTUDENTcreating a venue for almost 100 students to presentCONFER their papers, to discuss - and to share their thoughts among each other and distinguished scholars in ENCEthe panel discussion. 2019BANGKOK In this year, the Bangkok International Student Conference (BISC) 2019 will be held under the theme of “Redefning Democracy: The New Battle- INTERNATIONALground ?” since there have been numerous phenomena in the democratic world in which it leads to the importance of “Redefning Democracy” in this modern globalized world. The discussion will be under these 4 topics as STUDENTfollow: CONFERENCE 1. Democracy and Economic Development 20192. Social Media Infuences on Electoral Campaign 3. Democracy and Populism STUDENT4. Voter Education: Stakes CONFERENCE over the First Time Voters 2019 BANGKOKINTER N AT I O N A L S T U D E N T CONFERENCE2019 BANGKOK BANG- KOK INTERNATION- ALSTUDENT CONFER- WHY REDEFINING DEMOCRACY? Tracing back in the 5th Century BC, the term of dēmokratía or democracy in the modern time emerged Athens. It literally means “rule by people,” though, in fact, only the elite class had the right to rule and participate. The term of democracy eventually had reached its core value in the 19th and 20th centuries through the suffrage movement in which achieved the full enfranchisement. Up to now, there is still no consensus exists on how to defne democracy. There is merely the identifcation of the core elements which are legal equality, political freedom, and rule of law. Hence, the lack of a unanimous defnition of “democracy” leads to the diversifed interpretation, implementation, and gaps. In many countries, the defnition of democracy has been contested and interpreted differently. Numerous people also have different values towards the term “democracy”. Some believe that having merely an election is enough to be democratic while some believe that there are many more democratic values such as respect the minority, rule of law, political freedom, and so forth in order to be considered as democratic. This, therefore, has also led to the masquerade for ones to act under the name of legitimacy, such as the term “Thai-Style Democracy” in which had been espoused during the Field Marshall Sarit Thanarat in 1957 and later was revived by General Prayut Chan-o-cha whom both committed the coup. While, in the United States, Donald Trump won the election but now he is condemned by many people as a threat to democracy. Therefore, it has led to doubts about what actually is democracy, should there be a consensual defnition, and do we all under- stand the values of democracy? Hence, it is extremely crucial for “Redefning Democracy” in this new battleground which is the technologically globalized modern world. There are many questions that are left to be answered. Does democracy truly relate to the economic development while China in which is ruled by the communist party is now rising and become the world major power through economic growth? Does populism harm democracy? Is it necessary to educate the voters about the elections and democratic values? Does social media can shape the future of electoral campaigns and could be utilized as a tool to enhance direct democracy in the future. AGENDA & PANEL SETTINGS Monday, 21 January 2019 Venue: Faculty of Political Science, Thammasat University, Tha Prachan Campus 09.00 – 09.30 Registration 09.30 – 10.30 Warm up and ice-breaking activities 10.30 – 12.00 Campus tour 12.00 – 13.00 Lunch break 13.00 – 17.00 Paper presentation and discussion 17.00 – 17.20 Wrap up Tuesday, 22 January 2019 Venue: Faculty of Political Science, Thammasat University, Tha Prachan Campus 08.30 – 09.00 Registration 09.00 – 12.00 Public forum “Youth Engagement in Election” 12.00 – 13.00 Lunch break 13.00 – 16.30 Workshop 16.30 – 17.00 Wrap up 17.00 – 18.00 Networking 18.00 – 22.00 Closing ceremony and farewell party TOPIC DESCRIPTION SOCIAL MEDIA INFLUENCES ON ELECTORAL CAMPAIGN Social media, nowadays, have a great infuence on our lives. This is because the social media are served as platforms for presenting content by each of individual groups in our society. Moreover, the people also use social media as a means for communication not just among themselves, but also to the public. In other words, people use social media as a channel to broadcast their arguments or ideas that are controversial in the society including politics. Therefore, political parties and institutions began to collect these shared ideas on social media regarding political issues to contract their policies that would attract the public and raise popularity turning the social media to become the new political battleground. In turn, as the social media can penetrate into various social groups, it is used by the political parties as channel to project their political campaign. VOTER EDUCATION Election is considered one of the important factors indicating the democratic situation in one particular country. The election is also the time that the political power rest in the citizens’ hands which is very important as it will lead the country in the way the majority desires. Therefore, education regarding tovoting and election is very crucial. Voter education generally refers to informing and providing the citizen with information and materials about participating in election and democracy.
Recommended publications
  • Thailand White Paper

    Thailand White Paper

    THE BANGKOK MASSACRES: A CALL FOR ACCOUNTABILITY ―A White Paper by Amsterdam & Peroff LLP EXECUTIVE SUMMARY For four years, the people of Thailand have been the victims of a systematic and unrelenting assault on their most fundamental right — the right to self-determination through genuine elections based on the will of the people. The assault against democracy was launched with the planning and execution of a military coup d’état in 2006. In collaboration with members of the Privy Council, Thai military generals overthrew the popularly elected, democratic government of Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra, whose Thai Rak Thai party had won three consecutive national elections in 2001, 2005 and 2006. The 2006 military coup marked the beginning of an attempt to restore the hegemony of Thailand’s old moneyed elites, military generals, high-ranking civil servants, and royal advisors (the “Establishment”) through the annihilation of an electoral force that had come to present a major, historical challenge to their power. The regime put in place by the coup hijacked the institutions of government, dissolved Thai Rak Thai and banned its leaders from political participation for five years. When the successor to Thai Rak Thai managed to win the next national election in late 2007, an ad hoc court consisting of judges hand-picked by the coup-makers dissolved that party as well, allowing Abhisit Vejjajiva’s rise to the Prime Minister’s office. Abhisit’s administration, however, has since been forced to impose an array of repressive measures to maintain its illegitimate grip and quash the democratic movement that sprung up as a reaction to the 2006 military coup as well as the 2008 “judicial coups.” Among other things, the government blocked some 50,000 web sites, shut down the opposition’s satellite television station, and incarcerated a record number of people under Thailand’s infamous lèse-majesté legislation and the equally draconian Computer Crimes Act.
  • On Trumpism, Or the End of American Exceptionalism

    On Trumpism, Or the End of American Exceptionalism

    Teoria politica 9 | 2019 Annali IX On Trumpism, or the End of American Exceptionalism Nadia Urbinati Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/tp/820 Publisher Marcial Pons Printed version Date of publication: 1 June 2019 Number of pages: 209-226 ISSN: 0394-1248 Electronic reference Nadia Urbinati, « On Trumpism, or the End of American Exceptionalism », Teoria politica. Nuova serie Annali [Online], 9 | 2019, Online since 01 April 2020, connection on 26 May 2020. URL : http:// journals.openedition.org/tp/820 Teoria politica On Trumpism, or the End of American Exceptionalism Nadia Urbinati* Abstract This papers uses Trumpism to illustrate populism in power. It analyses it in its rhetorical style; in its propaganda, tropes, and ideology; and finally in its aims and achievements. It shows how the representative construction of the people is rhetorical and is independent of social classes and traditional ideologies. The paper argues that populist democracy is the name of a new form of representative government that is based on two phenomena: a direct relation between the leader and those in society whom the leader defines as the «right» or «good» people; and the superlative authority of the audience. Its immediate targets are the «obstacles» to the development of those phenomena: intermediary opinion-making bodies, such as parties; established media; and institutionalized systems for monitoring and controlling political power. Populist leaders compete with other political actors with regard to the representation of the people and use electoral victory in order to prove that «the people» they represent is the «right» people and deserves to rule for its own good.
  • Populists in Power Around the World | Institute for Global Change

    Populists in Power Around the World | Institute for Global Change

    Populists in Power Around the World JORDAN KYLE RENEWING LIMOR GULTCHIN THE CENTRE Contents Executive Summary 3 Introduction 5 The Trouble With Defining opulismP 9 Two Essential Features of Populism 12 Types of Populism 21 Cases of Populism in Power 26 Populism Trends Around the World 32 Conclusion 44 Appendix: Methodology 45 Downloaded from http://institute.global/insight/ renewing-centre/populists-power-around-world on November 7 2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXE CUTIVE SUMMARY Populism is dramatically shifting the global political landscape. This report defines populism and identifies its global prevalence by introducing a global database “Populists in Power: 1990–2018”. Only with a clear and systematic understanding of the phenomenon of populism can political leaders begin to offer meaningful and credible alternatives. This report sets out to define populism from a global perspective and identify some of its key trends since 1990. Populism contains two primary claims: • A country’s ‘true people’ are locked into conflict with outsiders, including establishment elites. • Nothing should constrain the will of the true people. Although populism always shares these two essential claims, it can take on widely varying forms across contexts. This report identifies three types of populism, distinguished by how populist leaders frame the conflict between the ‘true people’ and outsiders: • Cultural populism claims that the true people are the native members of the nation-state, and outsiders can include immigrants, criminals, ethnic and religious minorities, and cosmopolitan elites. Cultural populism tends to emphasise 3 religious traditionalism, law and order, sovereignty, and painting migrants as enemies. • Socio-economic populism claims that the true people are honest, hard-working members of the working class, and outsiders can include big business, capital owners and actors perceived as propping up an international capitalist system.
  • Bomb Planted at ASTV

    Bomb Planted at ASTV

    Volume 17 Issue 20 News Desk - Tel: 076-273555 May 15 - 21, 2010 Daily news at www.phuketgazette.net 25 Baht The Gazette is published in association with Bomb planted at ASTV Leaders react to grenade at ‘yellow-shirt’ TV station PAPER bag contain- told the Gazette that the grenade INSIDE ing a live hand grenade was not the work of the red shirts. was found hanging “There is conflict within the Afrom the front door of PAD itself. For example, some the ASTV ‘yellow-shirt’ television PAD leaders have turned into network office in Phuket Town ‘multi-colors’. That’s a point to on May 11. consider, too,” he said. Bomb disposal police safely Phuket Provincial Police removed the device, an M67 Commander Pekad Tantipong said fragmentation grenade with its pin the act was probably the work of still in place, shortly after it was an individual or small group. discovered at 9am. It had been “I don’t believe this was wrapped in electrical tape and ordered by the red shirt leaders placed in a box inside a brown in Bangkok…I’m confident in Bank on Bird paper shopping bag that read saying this will not affect tour- As Ironman Les Bird’s Alpine “Save the World”. ism at all,” he said. climb nears, find out how he’s When detonated, an M67 Sarayuth Mallam, vice been preparing. has an average ‘casualty radius’ president of the Phuket Tourist Page 10 of 15 meters and a ‘fatality ra- Association, was less confident. dius’ of five meters; fragments CALM AND COLLECTED: A bomb disposal expert shows the M67 grenade.
  • Board of Editors

    Board of Editors

    2020-2021 Board of Editors EXECUTIVE BOARD Editor-in-Chief KATHERINE LEE Managing Editor Associate Editor KATHRYN URBAN KYLE SALLEE Communications Director Operations Director MONICA MIDDLETON CAMILLE RYBACKI KOCH MATTHEW SANSONE STAFF Editors PRATEET ASHAR WENDY ATIENO KEYA BARTOLOMEO Fellows TREVOR BURTON SABRINA CAMMISA PHILIP DOLITSKY DENTON COHEN ANNA LOUGHRAN SEAMUS LOVE IRENE OGBO SHANNON SHORT PETER WHITENECK FACULTY ADVISOR PROFESSOR NANCY SACHS Thailand-Cambodia Border Conflict: Sacred Sites and Political Fights Ihechiluru Ezuruonye Introduction “I am not the enemy of the Thai people. But the [Thai] Prime Minister and the Foreign Minister look down on Cambodia extremely” He added: “Cambodia will have no happiness as long as this group [PAD] is in power.” - Cambodian PM Hun Sen Both sides of the border were digging in their heels; neither leader wanted to lose face as doing so could have led to a dip in political support at home.i Two of the most common drivers of interstate conflict are territorial disputes and the politicization of deep-seated ideological ideals such as religion. Both sources of tension have contributed to the emergence of bloody conflicts throughout history and across different regions of the world. Therefore, it stands to reason, that when a specific geographic area is bestowed religious significance, then conflict is particularly likely. This case study details the territorial dispute between Thailand and Cambodia over Prasat (meaning ‘temple’ in Khmer) Preah Vihear or Preah Vihear Temple, located on the border between the two countries. The case of the Preah Vihear Temple conflict offers broader lessons on the social forces that make religiously significant territorial disputes so prescient and how national governments use such conflicts to further their own political agendas.
  • Populism: an Introduction Is the Frst Introduction to the Theme of Populism

    Populism: an Introduction Is the Frst Introduction to the Theme of Populism

    KEY IDEAS Populism: An Introduction is the frst introduction to the theme of populism. It will introduce the principal theories, defnitions, models and contemporary debates. A number of global case studies will be used to illustrate the concept: POPULISM POPULISM • Russian populism; An Introduction • Latin American populism; • Italian populism. Populism will refect on the sociology of democratic processes and investigate the evolution of political consensus in contemporary political systems. Tis book will appeal to academics and postgraduate students working in the feld of sociology, political sociology and politics. Manuel Anselmi is an Assistant Professor of Political Sociology at the University of Perugia, Italy. Manuel Anselmi Manuel Anselmi Sociology/Political Teory/Political Sociology Cover image © Emma Espejo / Getty Images ISBN 978-1-138-28716-7 www.routledge.com 9 781138 287167 Routledge titles are available as eBook editions in a range of digital formats POPULISM Populism is the first introduction to the theme of populism. It will introduce the principal theories, definitions, models and contem- porary debates. A number of global case studies will be used to illustrate the concept: · Russian populism · Latin American populism · Italian populism. Populism: An Introduction will reflect on the sociology of demo- cratic processes and investigate the evolution of political con- sensus in contemporary political systems. This book will appeal to academics and postgraduate students working in the field of sociology, political sociology and politics. Manuel Anselmi is an Assistant Professor of Political Sociology at the University of Perugia, Italy. 1st Proofs – Not for Distribution. PAI.indb 1 02-06-2017 20:15:20 KEY IDEAS Series Editor: Peter Hamilton Designed to compliment the successful Key Sociologists, this series covers the main concepts, issues, debates and controversies in sociology and the social sciences.
  • PDF (Interactive)

    PDF (Interactive)

    Contents 21ST-CENTURY FASCISM & RESISTANCE Study for Struggle: Weaponizing Theory for the Fights Ahead 1 Rachel Herzing & Isaac Ontiveros Trumpism, 21st-Century Fascism, and the Dictatorship of the Transnational Capitalist Class 5 William I. Robinson ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY Social Justice, Environmental Destruction, and the Trump Presidency: A Criminological View 8 Michael J. Lynch, Paul B. Stretesky, Michael A. Long & Kimberly L. Barrett Orange is the New Green: The Environmental Justice Implications of Trump’s EPA 13 Jordan E. Mazurek HEALTH CARE Trump’s Health Care Agenda 18 Thomas Bodenheimer IMMIGRATION Donald Trump and Immigration: A Few Predictions 22 Ray Michalowski The “Immigrant Problem”: A Historical Review and the New Impacts under Trump 26 Marla A. Ramírez INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Some Aspects of the Trump Administration’s Foreign Policy 30 Gregory Shank Latin America vs. Trump 35 Clifford Welch LABOR & CLASS Meet the New Boss, Same as the Old Boss: Bracing for Trump’s Anti-Worker, Corporate Agenda 39 Colin Jenkins LGBTQ POLITICS A Queer Exemption? What Trump’s Presidency Means for LGBTQ Politics 43 Clare Sears PENAL POLITICS Punishment and Policing in the Trump Era 47 Michelle Brown Neoliberal Authoritarianism: Notes on Penal Politics in Trump’s America 51 Alessandro De Giorgi RACE & RACISM Donald Trump and Race 55 Jason Williams WELFARE POLICY The End Of Welfare? 59 Gwendolyn Mink Death by a Thousand Budget Cuts: The Need for a New Fight for Poor People’s Rights 62 Tina Sacks WOMEN’S ISSUES AND REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS Gender and Trump 65 Carol C. Mukhopadhyay Statement of the SJ Editorial Board on the Election of Donald Trump 69 About SJ Social Justice: A Journal of Crime, Conflict & World Order (ISSN: 1043–1578) is a peer-reviewed quarterly journal that offers analyses of the wide array of issues that shape our critical understanding of the present and inform current struggles for social justice—crime and social control, human rights, borders and migrations, labor and capital, environmental justice, education, race, gender, and sexuality.
  • Politics of Anxiety, Politics of Hope: Penal Populism and Duterte’S Rise to Power Curato, Nicole

    Politics of Anxiety, Politics of Hope: Penal Populism and Duterte’S Rise to Power Curato, Nicole

    www.ssoar.info Politics of Anxiety, Politics of Hope: Penal Populism and Duterte’s Rise to Power Curato, Nicole Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Zur Verfügung gestellt in Kooperation mit / provided in cooperation with: GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Curato, N. (2016). Politics of Anxiety, Politics of Hope: Penal Populism and Duterte’s Rise to Power. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 35(3), 91-109. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:gbv:18-4-10112 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY-ND Lizenz (Namensnennung- This document is made available under a CC BY-ND Licence Keine Bearbeitung) zur Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu (Attribution-NoDerivatives). For more Information see: den CC-Lizenzen finden Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/deed.de Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs The Early Duterte Presidency in the Philippines Curato, Nicole (2016), Politics of Anxiety, Politics of Hope: Penal Populism and Duterte’s Rise to Power, in: Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 35, 3, 91–109. URN: http://nbn-resolving.org/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:gbv:18-4-10112 ISSN: 1868-4882 (online), ISSN: 1868-1034 (print) The online version of this article can be found at: <www.CurrentSoutheastAsianAffairs.org> Published by GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Institute of Asian Studies and Hamburg University Press. The Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs is an Open Access publication. It may be read, copied and distributed free of charge according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 3.0 License.
  • Why Populism?1 Rogers Brubaker

    Why Populism?1 Rogers Brubaker

    Brubaker, Why Populism? Page 1 of 51 Why Populism?1 Rogers Brubaker Published online in Theory and Society, October 26, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-017-9301-7 Abstract It is a commonplace to observe that we have been living through an extraordinary pan-European and trans-Atlantic populist moment. But do the heterogeneous phenomena lumped under the rubric “populist” in fact belong together? Or is “populism” just a journalistic cliché and political epithet? In the first part of the paper, I defend the use of “populism” as an analytic category and the characterization of the last few years as a “populist moment,” and I propose an account of populism as a discursive and stylistic repertoire. In the second part, I specify the structural trends and the conjunctural convergence of a series of crises that jointly explain the clustering in space and time that constitutes the populist moment. The question in my title is thus twofold: it is a question about populism as a term or concept and a question about populism as a phenomenon in the world. The paper addresses both the conceptual and the explanatory question, limiting the scope of the explanatory argument to the pan-European and trans-Atlantic populist conjuncture of the last few years. 1 Acknowledgments. This paper was conceived and written at the Wissenschaftskolleg of Berlin, where I enjoyed the great privilege of a residential fellowship and benefited from many collegial discussions. Earlier versions were presented at the Wissenschaftskolleg itself, at the Institute of History of Humboldt University in Berlin, and at the conference on “Populism and Citizenship” organized by the Center for Citizenship, Social Pluralism and Religious Diversity in Potsdam; I thank participants in these events for their comments.
  • What Is Penal Populism?

    What Is Penal Populism?

    The Power of Penal Populism: Public Influences on Penal and Sentencing Policy from 1999 to 2008 By Tess Bartlett A thesis submitted to the Victoria University of Wellington in Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Criminology View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ResearchArchive at Victoria University of Wellington School of Social and Cultural Studies Victoria University of Wellington June 2009 Abstract This thesis explains the rise and power of penal populism in contemporary New Zealand society. It argues that the rise of penal populism can be attributed to social, economic and political changes that have taken place in New Zealand since the post­war years. These changes undermined the prevailing penal­welfare logic that had dominated policymaking in this area since 1945. It examines the way in which ‘the public’ became more involved in the administration of penal policy from 1999 to 2008. The credibility given to a law and order referendum in 1999, which drew attention to crime victims and ‘tough on crime’ discourse, exemplified their new role. In its aftermath, greater influence was given to the public and groups speaking on its behalf. The referendum also influenced political discourse in New Zealand, with politicians increasingly using ‘tough on crime’ policies in election campaigns as it was believed that this was what ‘the public’ wanted when it came to criminal justice issues. As part of these developments, the thesis examines the rise of the Sensible Sentencing Trust, a unique law and order pressure group that advocates for victims’ rights and the harsh treatment of offenders.
  • The Political Role of Business Magnates in Competitive Authoritarian Regimes

    The Political Role of Business Magnates in Competitive Authoritarian Regimes

    Jahrbuch für Wirtschaftsgeschichte 2019; 60(2): 299–334 Heiko Pleines The Political Role of Business Magnates in Competitive Authoritarian Regimes. A Comparative Analysis https://doi.org/10.1515/jbwg-2019-3001 Abstract: This contribution examines the role of business magnates (“oli- garchs”) in political transitions away from competitive authoritarianism and towards either full authoritarianism or democracy. Based on 65 cases of compet- itive authoritarian regimes named in the academic literature, 24 historical cases with politically active business magnates are identified for further investigation. The analysis shows that in about half of those cases business magnates do not have a distinct impact on political regime change, as they are tightly integrated into the ruling elites. If they do have an impact, they hamper democratization at an early stage, making a transition to full democracy a rare exception. At the same time, a backlash led by the ruling elites against manipulation through business magnates makes a transition to full autocracy more likely than in competitive authoritarian regimes without influential business magnates. JEL-Codes: D 72, D 74, N 40, P 48 Keywords: Business magnates, economic elites, political regime trajectories, competitive authoritarianism, Großunternehmer, Wirtschaftseliten, Entwick- lungspfade politischer Regime 1 Introduction Wealthy businesspeople who are able to influence political decisions acting on their own are in many present and historical cases treated as “grey eminences” who hold considerable political power. While it is obvious that they influence specific policies, their impact on political regime change is less clear. This ques- tion is especially relevant for so-called “soft”, i.e. electoral or competitive au- || Heiko Pleines, (Prof.
  • BREXIT, Trumpism and the Agency of Populism in Contemporary Political Communication Michael Ugorji* DVG Konzulting 25, Angus Gardens, NW9 5LG, London, UK

    BREXIT, Trumpism and the Agency of Populism in Contemporary Political Communication Michael Ugorji* DVG Konzulting 25, Angus Gardens, NW9 5LG, London, UK

    u omm nica C tio Ugorji, J Mass Communicat Journalism 2018, 8:1 s n s a & J DOI: 10.4172/2165-7912.1000355 M o f u o r Journal of l n a a n l r i s u m o J ISSN: 2165-7912 Mass Communication & Journalism Review Article OpenOpen Access Access BREXIT, Trumpism and the Agency of Populism in Contemporary Political Communication Michael Ugorji* DVG Konzulting 25, Angus Gardens, NW9 5LG, London, UK Abstract Donald J. Trump’s presidency and Brexit happened to the world in a flash and that flash has refused to wane. The reality of these two major socio-political upheavals has rattled pundits and since posed the question of how the events came to be. This study addresses the tangential role played by populism, which by its amorphousness and lack of any particular ideological depth readily lends itself to the services of various forms of socio-political ends. Therefore, this paper argues that the capacity of populism, as an ambivalent and radical agent of mass movements, to effectively invade the political issues space and sustain or alter the course of sociopolitical action is pivotal to the strategies that energized Brexit and Trumpism, and eventually gave them unlikely victories. Digging into the depths of this agency unearths its strategic communications powers and also establishes its salience to contemporary political ideology and rhetoric. Keywords: Political; Communication; People; Social popularity over other policy considerations”, therefore endorsing another view that casts it in the light of that which “depoliticizes Introduction the political and hyper-politicizes social relations” [4,5].