DOCSLIB.ORG

Populism: an Introduction Is the Frst Introduction to the Theme of Populism

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Populism: an Introduction Is the Frst Introduction to the Theme of Populism KEY IDEAS Populism: An Introduction is the frst introduction to the theme of populism. It will introduce the principal theories, defnitions, models and contemporary debates. A number of global case studies will be used to illustrate the concept: POPULISM POPULISM • Russian populism; An Introduction • Latin American populism; • Italian populism. Populism will refect on the sociology of democratic processes and investigate the evolution of political consensus in contemporary political systems. Tis book will appeal to academics and postgraduate students working in the feld of sociology, political sociology and politics. Manuel Anselmi is an Assistant Professor of Political Sociology at the University of Perugia, Italy. Manuel Anselmi Manuel Anselmi Sociology/Political Teory/Political Sociology Cover image © Emma Espejo / Getty Images ISBN 978-1-138-28716-7 www.routledge.com 9 781138 287167 Routledge titles are available as eBook editions in a range of digital formats POPULISM Populism is the first introduction to the theme of populism. It will introduce the principal theories, definitions, models and contem- porary debates. A number of global case studies will be used to illustrate the concept: · Russian populism · Latin American populism · Italian populism. Populism: An Introduction will reflect on the sociology of demo- cratic processes and investigate the evolution of political con- sensus in contemporary political systems. This book will appeal to academics and postgraduate students working in the field of sociology, political sociology and politics. Manuel Anselmi is an Assistant Professor of Political Sociology at the University of Perugia, Italy. 1st Proofs – Not for Distribution. PAI.indb 1 02-06-2017 20:15:20 KEY IDEAS Series Editor: Peter Hamilton Designed to compliment the successful Key Sociologists, this series covers the main concepts, issues, debates and controversies in sociology and the social sciences. The series aims to provide authoritative essays on central topics of social science, such as community, power, work, sexu- ality, inequality, benefits and ideology, class, family, etc. Books adopt a strong ‘individual’ line, as critical essays rather than literature sur- veys, offering lively and original treatments of their subject matter. The books will be useful to students and teachers of sociology, political sci- ence, economics, psychology, philosophy and geography. For a full list of titles in this series, please visit https://www.routledge. com/Key-Ideas/book-series/SE0058. Knowledge Marian Adolf & Nico Stehr Renewable Energies Matthias Gross and Rüdiger Mautz Sustainability Thomas Pfister, Martin Schweighofer and André Reichel Knowledge – second edition Is Knowledge Power? Marian Adolf and Nico Stehr Sexuality – fourth edition Jeffrey Weeks Social Capital – third edition John Field 1st Proofs – Not for Distribution. Patriarchy Pavla Miller Populism: An Introduction Manuel Anselmi PAI.indb 2 02-06-2017 20:15:20 POPULISM An Introduction Manuel Anselmi TRANSLATED BY LAURA FANO MORRISEY 1st Proofs – Not for Distribution. PAI.indb 3 02-06-2017 20:15:20 First published 2018 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN and by Routledge 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business © 2018 Manuel Anselmi The right of Manuel Anselmi to be identified as authors of this work has been asserted by them in accordance with sections 77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. Trademark notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data [CIP data] ISBN: 978-1-138-28715-0 (hbk) ISBN: 978-1-138-28716-7 (pbk) ISBN: 978-1-315-26839-2 (ebk) Typeset in Bembo by Deanta Global Publishing Services, Chennai, India 1st Proofs – Not for Distribution. PAI.indb 4 02-06-2017 20:15:20 CONTENTS Acknowledgements viii Introduction: the populist option 1 1 Preliminary elements of the concept of populism 5 PART I Theorists 9 2 Gino Germani: national-populism and modernization 11 3 Edward Shils: public sphere and populism in the US 15 4 Ghița Ionescu and Ernest Gellner: the foundation of studies on populism 18 5 Margaret Canovan and the shadow of democracy 23 6 Laclau: the construction of the political 30 1st Proofs – Not for Distribution. 7 Mény and Surel: sovereignty, constitution and the people 35 8 The recent debate 39 PAI.indb 5 02-06-2017 20:15:20 vi Contents PART II Major cases 49 9 Russian populism 51 10 Perón and Peronism 55 11 Left-turn and neo-populisms in Latin America 60 12 Italian neo-populism 66 PART III Other typologies and other problems 71 13 Penal populism 73 14 Cultural populism 78 15 Media populism 83 16 Constitutional populism 87 17 How to study populism: analytical prospects for social research 91 18 Concluding remarks. Democracy and populism: which perspectives? 100 Index 111 1st Proofs – Not for Distribution. PAI.indb 6 02-06-2017 20:15:20 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS A special thank you goes to Leonardo Morlino, Manuel Alcántara Sáez, Michele Sorice, Simón Pachano, Carlos de la Torre and Carlo Ruzza, who gave me the chance to discuss many of the theses supported here. I owe a lot to my wife Federica and to my family, without their support this would never have been written.In memory of Angelo Anselmi, my father. 1st Proofs – Not for Distribution. PAI.indb 7 02-06-2017 20:15:20 1st Proofs – Not for Distribution. PAI.indb 8 02-06-2017 20:15:20 INTRODUCTION The populist option After the Brexit vote, which decreed the exit of the United Kingdom from the European Union; after the American presi- dential elections, which brought Donald Trump to the presidency of the United States of America, 2016 will be remembered as the year of populism. The word populism seems to be one of the most widely used by international political commentators. However, global public opinion seems to have become accustomed to polit- ical surprises such as sudden changes that are legitimized from the bottom up and are directed against the so-called establishment. Populism is no longer an extreme hypothesis in the demo- cratic game; no longer a deviation, an anomaly, a degeneration or a pathology of democracy, as it was often defined in the past. Populism today is, to all intents and purposes, a highly probable option of democracy, not only related to social movements but also institutionalized and ruling entities. A reflection on contemporary democracy cannot be detached from a reflection on populism. Maybe, for this reason, it would be more appropriate to talk about a populist phase of democracies, but this is a judgement that we will leave to future political his- torians. Certainly, we can say that we are witnessing a social and political dynamic1st Proofs which started– Not some for Distribution.decades ago, that appears periodically and is of a global nature, as it manifests itself in very different geographical contexts. Given its geographical and social variety, populism always needs to be contextualized: the com- plexity of populism must be read and analyzed in conjunction PAI.indb 1 02-06-2017 20:15:20 2 Introduction with the respective social processes of democratization. Populism is deeply linked to the structural transformations of western democracies, which are increasingly exposed to plebiscitarian swerves and are under constant attack from private interests. In the attempt to understand this degeneration of democracies, Colin Crouch has talked of “post-democracy” (Crouch, 2004), and more recently, Nadia Urbinati has used the term “disfigured democracy” (Urbinati, 2014). As I will try and explain, populism must be considered as a com- plex phenomenon deeply connected with democracy, while reduc- tionist interpretations must be avoided. Populism is a modality of social expression of popular sovereignty, which acquires different forms but has some very specific traits that are determined by the social conditions of the context where it manifests itself. It is a demand for more democracy on the part of citizens; however, once it has taken hold, it can even generate an involution of democratic institutions. Therefore, I do not agree with those who describe pop- ulism as a mere phenomenon of protest or a reaction to the crisis of democracy. Although the word is the object of much polemic and criticism, it refers to a complexity of phenomena which are key to democracy and which need to be investigated. In this book, I aim to introduce and guide the reader through this complexity, illustrating the main theories and the most sig- nificant hermeneutic approaches. The volume is aimed at under- graduate students who are willing to approach the understanding of this problem in an analytical and value-free manner. At the same time, it can also be a useful instrument for all those who are interested in forming an initial idea on the subject. There is much confusion around this concept, owing to the heated discussions around it and for the deep variety of cases, which often seem difficult to compare. Populism is a complex, consolidated1st and manifoldProofs configuration– Not for Distribution.of political power based on popular sovereignty, which has changed over time along with changes in politics, and which now represents an independent field of scientific analysis. At the same time, it is multidisciplinary, encompassing political science, political sociology, communica- tion theory and social psychology.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • On Trumpism, Or the End of American Exceptionalism
    Teoria politica 9 | 2019 Annali IX On Trumpism, or the End of American Exceptionalism Nadia Urbinati Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/tp/820 Publisher Marcial Pons Printed version Date of publication: 1 June 2019 Number of pages: 209-226 ISSN: 0394-1248 Electronic reference Nadia Urbinati, « On Trumpism, or the End of American Exceptionalism », Teoria politica. Nuova serie Annali [Online], 9 | 2019, Online since 01 April 2020, connection on 26 May 2020. URL : http:// journals.openedition.org/tp/820 Teoria politica On Trumpism, or the End of American Exceptionalism Nadia Urbinati* Abstract This papers uses Trumpism to illustrate populism in power. It analyses it in its rhetorical style; in its propaganda, tropes, and ideology; and finally in its aims and achievements. It shows how the representative construction of the people is rhetorical and is independent of social classes and traditional ideologies. The paper argues that populist democracy is the name of a new form of representative government that is based on two phenomena: a direct relation between the leader and those in society whom the leader defines as the «right» or «good» people; and the superlative authority of the audience. Its immediate targets are the «obstacles» to the development of those phenomena: intermediary opinion-making bodies, such as parties; established media; and institutionalized systems for monitoring and controlling political power. Populist leaders compete with other political actors with regard to the representation of the people and use electoral victory in order to prove that «the people» they represent is the «right» people and deserves to rule for its own good.
    [Show full text]
  • Populists in Power Around the World | Institute for Global Change
    Populists in Power Around the World JORDAN KYLE RENEWING LIMOR GULTCHIN THE CENTRE Contents Executive Summary 3 Introduction 5 The Trouble With Defining opulismP 9 Two Essential Features of Populism 12 Types of Populism 21 Cases of Populism in Power 26 Populism Trends Around the World 32 Conclusion 44 Appendix: Methodology 45 Downloaded from http://institute.global/insight/ renewing-centre/populists-power-around-world on November 7 2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXE CUTIVE SUMMARY Populism is dramatically shifting the global political landscape. This report defines populism and identifies its global prevalence by introducing a global database “Populists in Power: 1990–2018”. Only with a clear and systematic understanding of the phenomenon of populism can political leaders begin to offer meaningful and credible alternatives. This report sets out to define populism from a global perspective and identify some of its key trends since 1990. Populism contains two primary claims: • A country’s ‘true people’ are locked into conflict with outsiders, including establishment elites. • Nothing should constrain the will of the true people. Although populism always shares these two essential claims, it can take on widely varying forms across contexts. This report identifies three types of populism, distinguished by how populist leaders frame the conflict between the ‘true people’ and outsiders: • Cultural populism claims that the true people are the native members of the nation-state, and outsiders can include immigrants, criminals, ethnic and religious minorities, and cosmopolitan elites. Cultural populism tends to emphasise 3 religious traditionalism, law and order, sovereignty, and painting migrants as enemies. • Socio-economic populism claims that the true people are honest, hard-working members of the working class, and outsiders can include big business, capital owners and actors perceived as propping up an international capitalist system.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF (Interactive)
    Contents 21ST-CENTURY FASCISM & RESISTANCE Study for Struggle: Weaponizing Theory for the Fights Ahead 1 Rachel Herzing & Isaac Ontiveros Trumpism, 21st-Century Fascism, and the Dictatorship of the Transnational Capitalist Class 5 William I. Robinson ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY Social Justice, Environmental Destruction, and the Trump Presidency: A Criminological View 8 Michael J. Lynch, Paul B. Stretesky, Michael A. Long & Kimberly L. Barrett Orange is the New Green: The Environmental Justice Implications of Trump’s EPA 13 Jordan E. Mazurek HEALTH CARE Trump’s Health Care Agenda 18 Thomas Bodenheimer IMMIGRATION Donald Trump and Immigration: A Few Predictions 22 Ray Michalowski The “Immigrant Problem”: A Historical Review and the New Impacts under Trump 26 Marla A. Ramírez INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Some Aspects of the Trump Administration’s Foreign Policy 30 Gregory Shank Latin America vs. Trump 35 Clifford Welch LABOR & CLASS Meet the New Boss, Same as the Old Boss: Bracing for Trump’s Anti-Worker, Corporate Agenda 39 Colin Jenkins LGBTQ POLITICS A Queer Exemption? What Trump’s Presidency Means for LGBTQ Politics 43 Clare Sears PENAL POLITICS Punishment and Policing in the Trump Era 47 Michelle Brown Neoliberal Authoritarianism: Notes on Penal Politics in Trump’s America 51 Alessandro De Giorgi RACE & RACISM Donald Trump and Race 55 Jason Williams WELFARE POLICY The End Of Welfare? 59 Gwendolyn Mink Death by a Thousand Budget Cuts: The Need for a New Fight for Poor People’s Rights 62 Tina Sacks WOMEN’S ISSUES AND REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS Gender and Trump 65 Carol C. Mukhopadhyay Statement of the SJ Editorial Board on the Election of Donald Trump 69 About SJ Social Justice: A Journal of Crime, Conflict & World Order (ISSN: 1043–1578) is a peer-reviewed quarterly journal that offers analyses of the wide array of issues that shape our critical understanding of the present and inform current struggles for social justice—crime and social control, human rights, borders and migrations, labor and capital, environmental justice, education, race, gender, and sexuality.
    [Show full text]
  • Politics of Anxiety, Politics of Hope: Penal Populism and Duterte’S Rise to Power Curato, Nicole
    www.ssoar.info Politics of Anxiety, Politics of Hope: Penal Populism and Duterte’s Rise to Power Curato, Nicole Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Zur Verfügung gestellt in Kooperation mit / provided in cooperation with: GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Curato, N. (2016). Politics of Anxiety, Politics of Hope: Penal Populism and Duterte’s Rise to Power. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 35(3), 91-109. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:gbv:18-4-10112 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY-ND Lizenz (Namensnennung- This document is made available under a CC BY-ND Licence Keine Bearbeitung) zur Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu (Attribution-NoDerivatives). For more Information see: den CC-Lizenzen finden Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/deed.de Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs The Early Duterte Presidency in the Philippines Curato, Nicole (2016), Politics of Anxiety, Politics of Hope: Penal Populism and Duterte’s Rise to Power, in: Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 35, 3, 91–109. URN: http://nbn-resolving.org/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:gbv:18-4-10112 ISSN: 1868-4882 (online), ISSN: 1868-1034 (print) The online version of this article can be found at: <www.CurrentSoutheastAsianAffairs.org> Published by GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Institute of Asian Studies and Hamburg University Press. The Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs is an Open Access publication. It may be read, copied and distributed free of charge according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 3.0 License.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Populism?1 Rogers Brubaker
    Brubaker, Why Populism? Page 1 of 51 Why Populism?1 Rogers Brubaker Published online in Theory and Society, October 26, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-017-9301-7 Abstract It is a commonplace to observe that we have been living through an extraordinary pan-European and trans-Atlantic populist moment. But do the heterogeneous phenomena lumped under the rubric “populist” in fact belong together? Or is “populism” just a journalistic cliché and political epithet? In the first part of the paper, I defend the use of “populism” as an analytic category and the characterization of the last few years as a “populist moment,” and I propose an account of populism as a discursive and stylistic repertoire. In the second part, I specify the structural trends and the conjunctural convergence of a series of crises that jointly explain the clustering in space and time that constitutes the populist moment. The question in my title is thus twofold: it is a question about populism as a term or concept and a question about populism as a phenomenon in the world. The paper addresses both the conceptual and the explanatory question, limiting the scope of the explanatory argument to the pan-European and trans-Atlantic populist conjuncture of the last few years. 1 Acknowledgments. This paper was conceived and written at the Wissenschaftskolleg of Berlin, where I enjoyed the great privilege of a residential fellowship and benefited from many collegial discussions. Earlier versions were presented at the Wissenschaftskolleg itself, at the Institute of History of Humboldt University in Berlin, and at the conference on “Populism and Citizenship” organized by the Center for Citizenship, Social Pluralism and Religious Diversity in Potsdam; I thank participants in these events for their comments.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Penal Populism?
    The Power of Penal Populism: Public Influences on Penal and Sentencing Policy from 1999 to 2008 By Tess Bartlett A thesis submitted to the Victoria University of Wellington in Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Criminology View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ResearchArchive at Victoria University of Wellington School of Social and Cultural Studies Victoria University of Wellington June 2009 Abstract This thesis explains the rise and power of penal populism in contemporary New Zealand society. It argues that the rise of penal populism can be attributed to social, economic and political changes that have taken place in New Zealand since the post­war years. These changes undermined the prevailing penal­welfare logic that had dominated policymaking in this area since 1945. It examines the way in which ‘the public’ became more involved in the administration of penal policy from 1999 to 2008. The credibility given to a law and order referendum in 1999, which drew attention to crime victims and ‘tough on crime’ discourse, exemplified their new role. In its aftermath, greater influence was given to the public and groups speaking on its behalf. The referendum also influenced political discourse in New Zealand, with politicians increasingly using ‘tough on crime’ policies in election campaigns as it was believed that this was what ‘the public’ wanted when it came to criminal justice issues. As part of these developments, the thesis examines the rise of the Sensible Sentencing Trust, a unique law and order pressure group that advocates for victims’ rights and the harsh treatment of offenders.
    [Show full text]
  • BREXIT, Trumpism and the Agency of Populism in Contemporary Political Communication Michael Ugorji* DVG Konzulting 25, Angus Gardens, NW9 5LG, London, UK
    u omm nica C tio Ugorji, J Mass Communicat Journalism 2018, 8:1 s n s a & J DOI: 10.4172/2165-7912.1000355 M o f u o r Journal of l n a a n l r i s u m o J ISSN: 2165-7912 Mass Communication & Journalism Review Article OpenOpen Access Access BREXIT, Trumpism and the Agency of Populism in Contemporary Political Communication Michael Ugorji* DVG Konzulting 25, Angus Gardens, NW9 5LG, London, UK Abstract Donald J. Trump’s presidency and Brexit happened to the world in a flash and that flash has refused to wane. The reality of these two major socio-political upheavals has rattled pundits and since posed the question of how the events came to be. This study addresses the tangential role played by populism, which by its amorphousness and lack of any particular ideological depth readily lends itself to the services of various forms of socio-political ends. Therefore, this paper argues that the capacity of populism, as an ambivalent and radical agent of mass movements, to effectively invade the political issues space and sustain or alter the course of sociopolitical action is pivotal to the strategies that energized Brexit and Trumpism, and eventually gave them unlikely victories. Digging into the depths of this agency unearths its strategic communications powers and also establishes its salience to contemporary political ideology and rhetoric. Keywords: Political; Communication; People; Social popularity over other policy considerations”, therefore endorsing another view that casts it in the light of that which “depoliticizes Introduction the political and hyper-politicizes social relations” [4,5].
    [Show full text]
  • Penal Populism
    PENAL POPULISM Following the lead of the USA, prison rates in many Western countries have soared while crime rates have been declining. Governments have developed penal policies in line with the sentiments and aspirations of the general public rather than their own bureaucratic organizations. This penal populism has led to much stronger relationships between politi- cians and those who claim to speak for the public – such as anti-crime social movements, talk-back radio hosts, and victims’ rights lobbyists. This book argues that governments have increasingly allowed penal populism to impact on policy development and that there has been less reliance on the expertise of civil servants and academics. This fascinating book shows that the roots of penal populism lie in the collapse of trust in the modern institutions of government, the decline of deference and the growth of ontological insecurity, along with new media technologies helping to spread it. It has had most influence in the development of policy on sex offenders, youth crime, persistent criminals and ‘incivilities’, and anti-social behaviour. Nonetheless, it is by no means an inevitable phenomenon in modern penal systems – there are societies with strong central bureaucracies which have blocked it. There are also limits to penal populism – the public do not have an insatiable appetite for punishment – and there has been resistance to it from judges, lawyers, academics and the restorative justice movement. The book is a fascinating exposé of current crime policy development and poses important questions for the future. It will be essential reading for students, researchers and professionals working in criminology and crime policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Populism: a Shape-Shifting Ghost
    School of Journalism and Mass Communications Faculty of Economic and Political Sciences Populism: A Shape-Shifting Ghost BY Ilker Yaman A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF DIGITAL MEDIA, COMMUNICATION AND JOURNALISM Specialization: European Journalism Supervisor: Vasilis Vamvakas January 2019 1 CONTENTS ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION 4 CONCEPTUAL HISTORY 6 LITERATURE REVIEW 12 3.1 Literature Review on the Populist Party in the United States 12 3.2 Literature Review on the Narodnik Movement in Russia 19 THEORETICAL BACKGROUND 25 4.1 Civil Society 25 4.2 Hegemony 30 4.3 Intellectuals 34 4.4 Manipulative Discourses 40 CONCEPTUAL HISTORY OF POPULISM 51 5.1 The Origin of the Concept of Populism 51 5.1.1 The Conceptual Approach to Populism 54 5.2 Populism in the Interwar Period 72 5.3 The Beginning of the Pejoration 80 5.3.1 The Spectre Haunting the World: Populism? 85 5.4 Populism from Latin America To Europe 89 5.5 Populism from Big P Populism to small p Populism 92 5.6 Populism from Financial Crisis to Present 101 CONCLUSIONS 105 BIBLIOGRAPHY 2 ABSTRACT Of all “-isms” in the political science lexicon and in the journalistic discourse, populism easily distinguishes itself from others. We usually know what’s liberalism, socialism or feminism and we are able to identify who belongs to their ideological communities. However, when it comes to populism, confusion arises to pin down the concept. Neither scholarly consensus exist for the definition of populism, nor there is a common agreement on the ideological ingredients derived from the populist perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • Central European Journal of Communication Volume 12 | No 2 (23) | Special Issue 2019 the Official Journal of the Polish Communication Association
    Central European Journal of Communication Volume 12 | No 2 (23) | Special Issue 2019 The official Journal of The Polish Communication Association Populism and the Media across Europe Editor: Agnieszka Stępińska Guest Editors: Nicoleta Corbu & Peter Maurer 130 Editors’ introduction 206 Media populism in Macedonia: Right- Nicoleta Corbu, Peter Maurer, wing populist style in the coverage and Agnieszka Stępińska of the “migrant crisis” Ivo Bosilkov 134 Hyperlink networks as a means of mobilization used by far-right 224 Famous women yearn for Putin, and movements other unlikely tales: Glamorizing right- Ina Fujdiak and Petr Ocelík wing populist actors in the Bulgarian editions of Cosmopolitan and Elle Miglena Sternadori 150 Nonverbal components of the populist style of political communication: 242 Methods/Research A study on televised presidential Some remarks on the comparative debates in Poland experiment as a method in assessing Dorota Piontek and Małgorzata populist political communication Tadeusz-Ciesielczyk in Europe Dominika Kasprowicz 169 “Protect our homeland!” Populist and Agnieszka Hess communication in the 2018 Hungarian election campaign on Facebook 256 Interview Tamás Tóth, Dalma Kékesdi- Péter Bajomi-Lázár: Boldog, Tamás Bokor, The Hungarian media system under and Zoltán Veczán political pressure 187 Examining the populist communication logic: Strategic use of social media 263 Book reviews in populist political parties in Norway and Sweden 270 Notes on contributors Bente Kalsnes cej 12.2.indb 129 2019-07-08 14:46:55 EDITORIAL Editors’ introduction Nicoleta Corbu ORCID: 0000-0001-9606-9827 NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF POLITCAL STUDIES AND PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, ROMANIA Peter Maurer ORCID: 0000-0001-6023-7366 NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, NORWAY Agnieszka Stępińska ORCID: 0000-0002-7361-2986 ADAM MICKIEWICZ UNIVERSITY, POZNAŃ, POLAND DOI: 10.19195/1899-5101.12.2(23).1 Populism is a multifaceted construct that is difficult to grasp.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of New-Populism in Europe and Asia Florian Hartleb
    The Rise of New-Populism in Europe and Asia Florian Hartleb I. Introduction The wave of modern populism has dramatically shaken the European Union (EU) and the United States (US) during the last few years. The year 2016 was an annus horribilis and heralded a new reality of post-truth politics. It included Brexit, the refugee crisis, the fear of Islamist terrorism with numerous and continuing attacks, the rise of right-wing populist parties and, more generally, authoritarian develop- ments on a global scale. After the dramatic accumulation of warning signals for liberal democracies and the EU as a political system sui generis, two scenarios have been discussed: Has “2016” become the zenith of the populist wave with the Dutch and French elections in 2017 as a reality check (Marine Le Pen and Geert Wilders could not reach the unrealistic goal of becoming President or Prime Minister of their country) or is it just the start for populism as a central political force in European politics? On the other hand, for the first time in German post-war history, a radical right-wing populist party entered the national parliament when the Alternative für Deutschland (AFD) became the third largest party in the Bundestag. In Austria, the radical-right wing Freedom Party represents the government as a junior partner. In Poland and Hungary, the conservative regimes have enforced measures that restrict the freedom of media and justice. In general, populism is not a phenomenon on the margin and in opposition, it has entered the mainstream. There is thus a need for deeper reflection about the status quo of (representative) democracies and a deeper understanding about the political and societal changes which have led to the present state of affairs.
    [Show full text]
  • Politically Driven 557026Research-Article2014
    EEPXXX10.1177/0888325414557026East European Politics and SocietiesBoda et al. / Politically Driven 557026research-article2014 East European Politics and Societies and Cultures Volume 29 Number 4 November 2015 871 –891 © 2014 SAGE Publications Politically Driven: 10.1177/0888325414557026 http://eeps.sagepub.com hosted at Mapping Political and Media Discourses http://online.sagepub.com of Penal Populism—The Hungarian Case Zsolt Boda Gabriella Szabó Attila Bartha Gergő Medve-Bálint Centre for Social Sciences, Hungarian Academy of Sciences Zsuzsanna Vidra Center for Policy Studies, Central European University Penal populism, advocating severe punishment of criminals, has greatly influenced justice policy measures in Eastern Europe over the last decade. This article takes Hungary as a typical case in the region and based on a recent criminal policy reform it investigates the roots of the penal populist discourse, which legitimizes and supports punitive measures. The research assumes that policy discourses need specific social actors that construct and promote them. Accordingly, the article explores whether the right-wing political parties and the tabloid media have taken a leading role in construct- ing the discourse of penal populism as a response to public concerns about crime. Content analysis and frame analysis of political communication and media was con- ducted to identify the discursive positions of major political parties and selected national media sources. The research found that penal populism was dominant in Hungarian political discourse while most of the media, including the tabloid press, have been rather reluctant to adopt punitive tones. The results thus contradict previous findings and offer a more nuanced view on how penal populism is being constructed and promoted in Eastern Europe.
    [Show full text]