DOCSLIB.ORG

Transit Route Analysis for the Glendale Beeline Service Area Draft

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Transit Route Analysis for the Glendale Beeline Service Area Draft Transit Route Analysis for the Glendale Beeline Service Area Draft July 11, 2019 Glendale Beeline 2019 Transit Route Analysis Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... ES-1 Previous Studies ....................................................................................................... ES-2 Ridership and Productivity ......................................................................................... ES-3 On-board Survey Findings ......................................................................................... ES-5 Regional Bus Service in and Near Glendale .............................................................. ES-6 Public Outreach ......................................................................................................... ES-7 Recommendations..................................................................................................... ES-8 Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION AND PREVIOUS STUDIES ..................................................1-1 1.0 Introduction and Study Purpose ........................................................................1-1 1.1 Organization of the Transit Route Analysis Report ............................................1-2 1.2 Review of Previous Studies ..............................................................................1-3 1.3 Summary ..........................................................................................................1-9 Chapter 2 ROUTE PROFILES ...........................................................................................2-1 2.0 Introduction .......................................................................................................2-1 2.1 Overall Findings ................................................................................................2-1 2.2 Route Profiles ...................................................................................................2-7 Route 1 .............................................................................................................2-8 Route 2 ...........................................................................................................2 -10 Route 3, including all short-turn variations.......................................................2 -12 Route 3 and Route 31 .....................................................................................2 -14 Route 32 .........................................................................................................2 -16 Route 33 .........................................................................................................2 -18 Route 34 .........................................................................................................2 -20 Route 4 ...........................................................................................................2 -22 Route 5 ...........................................................................................................2 -24 Route 6 ...........................................................................................................2 -26 Route 7 ...........................................................................................................2 -28 Route 11 .........................................................................................................2 -30 Route 12 .........................................................................................................2 -32 Chapter 3 ON-BOARD SURVEY .......................................................................................3-1 3.0 Introduction .......................................................................................................3-1 3.1 Summary of On-Board Survey Findings ............................................................3-1 3.2 Ridership Information and Travel Patterns ........................................................3-3 3.3 Rider Preferences ...........................................................................................3 -15 3.4 Current and Preferred Means of Obtaining Information about the Beeline ...... 3-20 3.5 Customer Demographics and Ratings of Service Elements ............................ 3-26 3.6 Trends over Time: Comparison to 2008 and 2013 On-board Survey............... 3-34 Dan Boyle & Associates, Inc. Page i Glendale Beeline 2019 Transit Route Analysis Table of Contents Chapter 4 REGIONAL BUS SERVICE IN AND NEAR GLENDALE ...................................4-1 4.0 Introduction .......................................................................................................4-1 4.1 Metro Routes in Glendale .................................................................................4-2 4.2 LADOT Commuter Express Routes ................................................................4 -11 4.3 Burbank Bus ...................................................................................................4 -11 4.4 Pasadena Transit ............................................................................................ 4-13 4.5 Metro Travel Database via Smartphone Location............................................4 -13 4.6 Summary ........................................................................................................4 -15 Chapter 5 PUBLIC OUTREACH ........................................................................................5-1 5.0 Introduction .......................................................................................................5-1 5.1 E-Survey Approach and Design ........................................................................5-1 5.2 E-Survey Promotion ..........................................................................................5-2 5.3 E-Survey Analysis ...........................................................................................5 -10 5.4 Opportunities ..................................................................................................5 -25 Chapter 6 SERVICE CONCEPTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................6-1 6.0 Introduction .......................................................................................................6-1 6.1 Recommendations ............................................................................................6-4 Near-term Recommendations ...........................................................................6-4 Mid-term Recommendations ...........................................................................6 -17 6.2 Ridership, Revenue, and Cost Impacts ...........................................................6 -21 Appendix A Ridership Detail ................................................................... Under separate cover LIST OF TABLES Table ES.1 Beeline 2018 Ridership by Route and Day of Week ....................................... ES-3 Table ES.2 Beeline Percentage Changes in Ridership by Route and Day of Week, 2013 to 2018 .................................................................................................. ES-4 Table ES.3 Beeline 2018 Boardings per Revenue Hour by Route and Day of Week ........ ES-5 Table ES.4 Annual Impacts of Recommendations .......................................................... ES-11 Table 2.1 Beeline 2018 Ridership by Route and Day of Week ..........................................2-2 Table 2.2 Beeline Percentage Changes in Ridership by Route and Day of Week, 2013 to 2018 .....................................................................................................2-3 Table 2.3 Beeline 2018 Boardings per Revenue Hour by Route and Day of Week ...........2-4 Table 2.4 Beeline Percentage Changes in Boardings per Revenue Hour by Route and Day of Week, 2013 to 2018 .........................................................................2-5 Table 2.5 Beeline Schedule Adherence ............................................................................2-6 Table 3.1 Survey Results: Intersections/Locations with the Greatest Number of Boardings ....................................................................................................3-6 Table 3.2 Survey Results: Intersections/Locations with the Greatest Number of Alightings ....................................................................................................3-6 Table 3.3 Reported and Adjusted Frequency of Ridership ..............................................3 -12 Table 3.4 Requested Weekday Start Time for Those Preferring Earlier Service ............. 3-17 Table 3.5 Requested Weekday End Time for Those Preferring Later Service ................ 3-18 Dan Boyle & Associates, Inc. Page ii Glendale Beeline 2019 Transit Route Analysis Table of Contents Table 3.6 Requested Weekend Start Time for Those Preferring Earlier Service ............. 3-19 Table 3.7 Requested Weekend End Time for Those Preferring Later Service ................ 3-19 Table 3.8 Mobile Devices Carried by Beeline Customers ...............................................3 -21 Table 3.9 Mobile Devices Carried by Beeline Customers by Income ..............................3 -21 Table 3.10 Mobile Devices Carried by Beeline Customers by Age ...................................3 -22 Table 3.11 Detailed Ratings of Beeline Service Elements ................................................3 -32 Table 3.12 Importance of Service Elements .....................................................................3 -33 Table 3.13 Language,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Metro Bus and Metro Rail System
    Approximate frequency in minutes Approximate frequency in minutes Approximate frequency in minutes Approximate frequency in minutes Metro Bus Lines East/West Local Service in other areas Weekdays Saturdays Sundays North/South Local Service in other areas Weekdays Saturdays Sundays Limited Stop Service Weekdays Saturdays Sundays Special Service Weekdays Saturdays Sundays Approximate frequency in minutes Line Route Name Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve Line Route Name Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve Line Route Name Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve Line Route Name Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve Weekdays Saturdays Sundays 102 Walnut Park-Florence-East Jefferson Bl- 200 Alvarado St 5-8 11 12-30 10 12-30 12 12-30 302 Sunset Bl Limited 6-20—————— 603 Rampart Bl-Hoover St-Allesandro St- Local Service To/From Downtown LA 29-4038-4531-4545454545 10-12123020-303020-3030 Exposition Bl-Coliseum St 201 Silverlake Bl-Atwater-Glendale 40 40 40 60 60a 60 60a 305 Crosstown Bus:UCLA/Westwood- Colorado St Line Route Name Peaks Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve 3045-60————— NEWHALL 105 202 Imperial/Wilmington Station Limited 605 SANTA CLARITA 2 Sunset Bl 3-8 9-10 15-30 12-14 15-30 15-25 20-30 Vernon Av-La Cienega Bl 15-18 18-20 20-60 15 20-60 20 40-60 Willowbrook-Compton-Wilmington 30-60 — 60* — 60* — —60* Grande Vista Av-Boyle Heights- 5 10 15-20 30a 30 30a 30 30a PRINCESSA 4 Santa Monica Bl 7-14 8-14 15-18 12-18 12-15 15-30 15 108 Marina del Rey-Slauson Av-Pico Rivera 4-8 15 18-60 14-17 18-60 15-20 25-60 204 Vermont Av 6-10 10-15 20-30 15-20 15-30 12-15 15-30 312 La Brea
    [Show full text]
  • CITY of GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA REPORT to THE: Joint El City Council N Housing Authority El Successor Agency El Oversight Board El
    CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA REPORT TO THE: Joint El City Council N Housing Authority El Successor Agency El Oversight Board El August 27, 2019 AGENDA ITEM Report: Report Regarding Grant Funding for a Transit Fleet Electrification Feasibility Study. 1) Adopt a Resolution of Appropriation to appropriate local transportation funds in the amount of $31,354 from Measure R Local Return funds for FY 201 9-20. 2) Approve a Motion to authorize the City Manager, or her designee, to execute all grant- related agreements, certifications, and documents necessary for the Program. COUNCIL ACTION Public Hearing El Ordinance El Consent Calendar N Action Item El Report Only El Approved for calendar ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION Signature Submitted by: Yazdan T. Emrani, P.E., Director of Public Works Prepared by: Alex Okashita, Transit Associate Approved by: Yasmin K. Beers, City Manager Reviewed by: ____ Roubik Golanian, Assistant City Manager 2 Kathryn Engel, Transit Manager Michael J. Garcia, City Attorney ____________________ Michele Flynn, Director of Finance ______________________ 48/ RECOMMENDATION ____________________________________________ It is respectfully recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution to appropriate $31,354 of Measure R Local Return funds as grant match for the Transit Fleet Electrification Feasibility Study (“Program”); and, approve a motion to authorize the City Manager, or her designee, to execute all grant-related agreements, certifications, and documents necessary for the Program. BACKGROUNDIANALYSIS The Caltrans Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant is a competitive statewide grant that received 198 applications for FY 2019-20 funding, and resulted in the award of only 84 projects for a total of $27.8 million. Grant categories include Sustainable Communities, Strategic Partnerships, and Adaptation Planning.
    [Show full text]
  • Board of Directors J U L Y 2 4 , 2 0
    BOARD OF DIRECTORS JULY 24, 2015 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY BOARD ROSTER SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY County Member Alternate Orange: Shawn Nelson (Chair) Jeffrey Lalloway* Supervisor, 4th District Mayor Pro Tem, City of Irvine 2 votes County of Orange, Chairman OCTA Board, Chair OCTA Board Gregory T. Winterbottom Todd Spitzer* Public Member Supervisor, 3rd District OCTA Board County of Orange OCTA Board Riverside: Daryl Busch (Vice-Chair) Andrew Kotyuk* Mayor Council Member 2 votes City of Perris City of San Jacinto RCTC Board, Chair RCTC Board Karen Spiegel Debbie Franklin* Council Member Mayor City of Corona City of Banning RCTC Board RCTC Board Ventura: Keith Millhouse (2nd Vice-Chair) Brian Humphrey Mayor Pro Tem Citizen Representative 1 vote City of Moorpark VCTC Board VCTC Board Los Angeles: Michael Antonovich Roxana Martinez Supervisor, 5th District Councilmember 4 votes County of Los Angeles, Mayor City of Palmdale Metro Board Metro Appointee Hilda Solis Joseph J. Gonzales Supervisor, 1st District Councilmember County of Los Angeles City of South El Monte Metro Board Metro Appointee Paul Krekorian Borja Leon Councilmember, 2nd District Metro Appointee Metro Board Ara Najarian [currently awaiting appointment] Council Member City of Glendale Metro Board One Gateway Plaza, 12th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90012 SCRRA Board of Directors Roster Page 2 San Bernardino: Larry McCallon James Ramos* Mayor Supervisor, 3rd District 2 votes City of Highland County of San Bernardino, Chair SANBAG Board SANBAG Board
    [Show full text]
  • SERVICE CHANGES As of July 1, 2019 Effective July 1 There Have Been No Service Changes
    SERVICE CHANGES as of July 1, 2019 Effective July 1 There have been no service changes. INFORMATION (661) 294-1BUS (1287) TDD (661) 295-6382 or (800) 826-7280 All schedules are available online at SantaClaritaTransit.com. @SCTBus All City of Santa Clarita Transit buses and vans are wheelchair accessible. City of Santa Clarita Transit Maintenance Facility 28250 Constellation Road Santa Clarita, CA 91355-5000 Printed on recycled paper. On the cover: Los Angeles Union Station. Cover photograph courtesy of Metro © 2015 LACMTA SANTA CLARITA VALLEY 757 Noho Express 794 /791 / 757 796 799 NORTH 792 / HOLLYWOOD 796 791 797 NOHO STATION CHATSWORTH METRO ORANGE LINE VAN NUYS CANOGA PARK RESEDA WARNER CENTER LADOT 549 UNIVERSAL CITY WOODLAND HILLS ENCINO HOLLY WOOD 797 METRO PURPLE LINE 792 METRO RED LINE WESTWOOD/UCLA WILSHIRE/ CENTURY CITY WESTERN EXPO LINE 7TH/ CULVER CITY EXPOSITION METRO PARK STATION METRO BLUE LINE BLUE METRO LAX METRO GREEN LINE PACIFIC OCEAN EL SEGUNDO REDONDO BEACH LONG BEACH COMMUTER TRANSIT SYSTEM MAP SYSTEM TRANSIT COMMUTER City of Santa Clarita Transit / COMMUTER SCHEDULE / July 2019 Transit Commuter Express Bus Autobús expreso de tránsito Commuter Commuter Transit System Map / Mapa del sistema de tránsito Commuter ...........................1 Welcome Aboard and General Information / Bienvenido a bordo y información general ..... 2-5 Route / Ruta 757 NoHo Express 6-7 SERVING / SIRVIENDO: North Hollywood Station, Red Line, Orange Line CONNECTING TO / CONEXIÓNA: METRO Bus/Rail, LADOT, BurbankBus BOB HOPE Route / Rutas 796
    [Show full text]
  • Los Angeles - Glendale - Burbank Corridor Feasibility Study Final Report 21 October 2019
    Los Angeles - Glendale - Burbank Corridor Feasibility Study Final Report 21 October 2019 Prepared by: In association with: IBI Group Terry A Hayes Associates HDR Translink RSE Epic Land Solutions RSG Costin Public Outreach Group LOS ANGELES GLENDALE BURBANK CORRIDOR FEASIBILITY STUDY FINAL REPORT PREPARED FOR Metro Regional Rail One Gateway Plaza Los Angeles, CA October 21, 2019 IN ASSOCIATION WITH: IBI Group HDR RSE RSG Terry A. Hayes Associates Translink Epic Land Solutions Costin Public Outreach Group Los Angeles-Glendale-Burbank Corridor Feasibility Study Final Report October 2019 This page intentionally left blank. Page ii Los Angeles-Glendale-Burbank Corridor Feasibility Study Final Report October 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................................................................. 1 Project Purpose...................................................................................................................... 1 Background ............................................................................................................................ 1 Feasibility Study Objectives ................................................................................................... 2 Study Findings ....................................................................................................................... 5 Study Resolution ...................................................................................................................10 1. INTRODUCTION
    [Show full text]
  • Countywide Bus Rapid Transit Study Consultant’S Report (Final) July 2011
    Barrier system (from TOA) Countywide Bus Rapid Transit Study Consultant’s Report (Final) July 2011 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION COUNTYWIDE BUS RAPID TRANSIT STUDY Consultant’s Report (Final) July 2011 Countywide Bus Rapid Transit Study Table of Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. ES-1 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Key additional elements of BRT network ...................................................................... 2 1.1.1 Relationship to land use ........................................................................................ 2 1.1.2 Station access ...................................................................................................... 3 1.1.3 Brand identity ........................................................................................................ 4 1.2 Organization of report .................................................................................................. 5 1.3 Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................ 5 2 Study Methodology ............................................................................................................. 7 2.1 High-level roadway screening ...................................................................................... 9 2.2 Corridor development and initial
    [Show full text]
  • Resolution #20-9
    BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION BALTIMORE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION BOARD RESOLUTION #20-9 RESOLUTION TO ENDORSE THE UPDATED BALTIMORE REGION COORDINATED PUBLIC TRANSIT – HUMAN SERVICES TRANSPORTATION PLAN WHEREAS, the Baltimore Regional Transportation Board (BRTB) is the designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the Baltimore region, encompassing the Baltimore Urbanized Area, and includes official representatives of the cities of Annapolis and Baltimore; the counties of Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Carroll, Harford, Howard, and Queen Anne’s; and representatives of the Maryland Departments of Transportation, the Environment, Planning, the Maryland Transit Administration, Harford Transit; and WHEREAS, the Baltimore Regional Transportation Board as the Metropolitan Planning Organization for the Baltimore region, has responsibility under the provisions of the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act for developing and carrying out a continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive transportation planning process for the metropolitan area; and WHEREAS, the Federal Transit Administration, a modal division of the U.S. Department of Transportation, requires under FAST Act the establishment of a locally developed, coordinated public transit-human services transportation plan. Previously, under MAP-21, legislation combined the New Freedom Program and the Elderly Individuals and Individuals with Disabilities Program into a new Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program, better known as Section 5310. Guidance on the new program was provided in Federal Transit Administration Circular 9070.1G released on June 6, 2014; and WHEREAS, the Federal Transit Administration requires a plan to be developed and periodically updated by a process that includes representatives of public, private, and nonprofit transportation and human services providers and participation by the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Maintenance Surface Treatment (MST) Paving Program, April 13, 2010
    Maine State Library Digital Maine Transportation Documents Transportation 4-13-2010 MaineDOT Region 2 : Maintenance Surface Treatment (MST) Paving Program, April 13, 2010 Maine Department of Transportation Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalmaine.com/mdot_docs Recommended Citation Maine Department of Transportation, "MaineDOT Region 2 : Maintenance Surface Treatment (MST) Paving Program, April 13, 2010" (2010). Transportation Documents. 1381. https://digitalmaine.com/mdot_docs/1381 This Text is brought to you for free and open access by the Transportation at Digital Maine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Transportation Documents by an authorized administrator of Digital Maine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MaineDOT 2010 Maintenance Surface Treatment (MST) Paving Program MaineDOT Map ID Municipalities Anticipated Road Segment Description Miles Region # Affected 2010 Dates Route 105 - from the southerly junction of Routes 131 and 105, 2 21 Appleton, Hope 11.34 8/2 - 10/1 extending southerly to the Camden/Hope town line Route 100 - from 1.84 miles east of the Benton/Fairfield town line to 2 17 Benton 2.95 9/8 - 9/21 0.47 mile westerly of the Benton/Clinton town line Turner/Biscay Road - from the junction with Biscay Road, Bremen 2 16 Bremen 3.04 8/2 - 10/1 to the junction with Route 32, Bremen Route 139 - from the intersection of Route 137/7 in Brooks, 2 114 Brooks, Knox 8.78 6/28 - 8/13 extending northerly to the junction of Routes 139 and 220 Weeks Mills Road - from the intersection of
    [Show full text]
  • The Bulletin STATEN ISLAND’S 157-YEAR-OLD RAILROAD
    ERA BULLETIN — SEPTEMBER, 2017 The Bulletin Electric Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated Vol. 60, No. 9 September, 2017 The Bulletin STATEN ISLAND’S 157-YEAR-OLD RAILROAD Published by the Electric (Continued from August, 2017 issue) Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated, PO Box Before the end of 1925, the railroad was Buses adjacent to the railroad appeared in 3323, New York, New able to operate full electric service from St. the 1920s, but the railroad still made a profit. York 10163-3323. George to Tottenville, South Beach, and Ar- Several years later, railroad riding declined lington with 100 new M.U. electric cars. The because of competition from the buses. For general inquiries, or fleet was composed of 90 motor cars num- When the Isle Transportation Company sur- Bulletin submissions, bered 300-389 and ten trailers numbered rendered its franchise on February 23, 1947, contact us at bulletin@ erausa.org. ERA’s 500-509, of which five were eventually con- the Board of Transportation started operating website is verted to motors. Freight was also carried on the buses immediately, retaining the five-cent www.erausa.org. nearly the entire line, including the non- fare with several five-cent zones depending electrified track extending from Arlington on the distance. On July 1, 1948, bus fares Editorial Staff: across the bridge to Cranford Junction, New were increased to seven cents, zone fares Editor-in-Chief: Bernard Linder Jersey. Because the passenger service usu- were abolished, and passengers could buy a Tri-State News and ally operated at a deficit, the company was 2-cent transfer valid on subway lines at Commuter Rail Editor: unable to spend $17 million to extend the South Ferry, Manhattan.
    [Show full text]
  • Purpose and Need Statement
    Purpose and Need Statement South Halsted Bus Corridor Enhancement Project November 2018 Prepared for: Prepared by: g PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK d PURPOSE AND NEED STATEMENT Table of Contents Introduction 2 PURPOSE AND NEED STATEMENT Introduction The South Halsted Bus Corridor Enhancement Project was initiated by the Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) in partnership with Pace Suburban Bus to improve transit along approximately 11 miles of South Halsted Street, from the Pace Harvey Transportation Center to 79th Street. The corridor also includes segments of 79th and 95th Streets that provide connections to the CTA Red Line 79th and 95th Street Stations. For study purposes, the project area includes a half mile catchment area around the corridor as shown in Figure 1.1. The Purpose and Need Statement provides a foundation and justification for the project and is required for all projects going through the federal National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process.1 The South Halsted Bus Corridor serves the communities of Harvey, Phoenix, Dixmoor, Riverdale, Calumet Park, and the City of Chicago neighborhoods of West Pullman, Morgan Park, Roseland, Washington Heights, and Auburn Gresham. The project corridor aligns or intersects with multiple east-west and north-south arterial roadways, CTA and Pace bus routes, CTA and Metra rail stations, and shared-use paths. Transit improvements would complement CTA’s planned extension of the Red Line from 95th Street to 130th Street, as the preferred alignment is located a half mile or more from the Halsted Corridor. The Red Line Extension is currently undergoing the federal environmental review and planning process. The corridor is populated with mainly commercial businesses, surrounded by residential communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Metro Public Hearing Pamphlet
    Proposed Service Changes Metro will hold a series of six virtual on proposed major service changes to public hearings beginning Wednesday, Metro’s bus service. Approved changes August 19 through Thursday, August 27, will become effective December 2020 2020 to receive community input or later. How to Participate By Phone: Other Ways to Comment: Members of the public can call Comments sent via U.S Mail should be addressed to: 877.422.8614 Metro Service Planning & Development and enter the corresponding extension to listen Attn: NextGen Bus Plan Proposed to the proceedings or to submit comments by phone in their preferred language (from the time Service Changes each hearing starts until it concludes). Audio and 1 Gateway Plaza, 99-7-1 comment lines with live translations in Mandarin, Los Angeles, CA 90012-2932 Spanish, and Russian will be available as listed. Callers to the comment line will be able to listen Comments must be postmarked by midnight, to the proceedings while they wait for their turn Thursday, August 27, 2020. Only comments to submit comments via phone. Audio lines received via the comment links in the agendas are available to listen to the hearings without will be read during each hearing. being called on to provide live public comment Comments via e-mail should be addressed to: via phone. [email protected] Online: Attn: “NextGen Bus Plan Submit your comments online via the Public Proposed Service Changes” Hearing Agendas. Agendas will be posted at metro.net/about/board/agenda Facsimiles should be addressed as above and sent to: at least 72 hours in advance of each hearing.
    [Show full text]
  • City Commission
    City of Miami City Hall 3500 Pan American Drive Miami, FL 33133 www.miamigov.com Meeting Minutes Thursday, May 14, 2015 9:00 AM REGULAR City Hall Commission Chambers City Commission Tomás Regalado, Mayor Wifredo (Willy) Gort, Chair Keon Hardemon, Vice Chair Marc David Sarnoff, Commissioner District Two Frank Carollo, Commissioner District Three Francis Suarez, Commissioner District Four Daniel J. Alfonso, City Manager Victoria Méndez, City Attorney Todd B. Hannon, City Clerk City Commission Meeting Minutes May 14, 2015 CONTENTS PR - PRESENTATIONS AND PROCLAMATIONS AM - APPROVING MINUTES MV - MAYORAL VETOES CA - CONSENT AGENDA PH - PUBLIC HEARINGS SR - SECOND READING ORDINANCES FR - FIRST READING ORDINANCES RE - RESOLUTIONS BC - BOARDS AND COMMITTEES DI - DISCUSSION ITEMS PART B PZ - PLANNING AND ZONING ITEM (S) MAYOR AND COMMISSIONERS' ITEMS M - MAYOR'S ITEMS D1 - DISTRICT 1 ITEMS D2 - DISTRICT 2 ITEMS D3 - DISTRICT 3 ITEMS D4 - DISTRICT 4 ITEMS D5 - DISTRICT 5 ITEMS City of Miami Page 2 Printed on 6/8/2015 City Commission Meeting Minutes May 14, 2015 9:00 A.M. INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Present: Chair Gort, Commissioner Sarnoff, Commissioner Carollo, Commissioner Suarez and Vice Chair Hardemon On the 14th day of May 2015, the City Commission of the City of Miami, Florida, met at its regular meeting place in City Hall, 3500 Pan American Drive, Miami, Florida, in regular session. The Commission Meeting was called to order by Chair Gort at 9:04 a.m., recessed at 12:16 p.m., reconvened at 3:44 p.m., and adjourned at 8:14 p.m. Note for the Record: Commissioner Sarnoff entered the Commission chamber at 9:05 a.m., Vice Chair Hardemon entered the Commission chamber at 9:07 a.m., Commissioner Suarez entered the Commission chamber at 9:13 a.m., and Commissioner Carollo entered the Commission chamber at 9:38 a.m.
    [Show full text]