Nuclear Power and the Environment. INSTITUTTON International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna (Austria)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Nuclear Power and the Environment. INSTITUTTON International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna (Austria) DOCUMENT RESUME ED 070 606 SE 014 971 TITLE Nuclear Power and the Environment. INSTITUTTON International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna (Austria) . PUB DATE 72 NOTE 92p. t4 EDRS PRICE MF-$0.65 HC-$3.29 DESCRIPTORS Bibliographic Citations; *Conference Reports; *Energy; Environmental Education; Health Education; *Public Health; *Radiation; *Safety; Science Education ABSTRACT This booklet is a summary of an international symposium, held in August 1970 in New York City, on the environmental aspects of nuclear power stations. The symposium was convened under the sponsorship .of the International Atomic Energy Agency mum and the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (USAFC). The information is presented in a condensed and readily understandable form, and it is hoped that it will be useful to those interested in a summary view of the public health and environmental aspects of nuclear power production. Contents are organized according to major headings as follows: "The Role of Atomic Energy in Meeting Future Power Needs," "Radiation Protection Standards," "Safe !Handling of Radioactive Materials," "Other Impacts," "Public Health Considerations," and "Summary." Included in the summary are lists of "pertinent publications" of the IAEA, the World Health Organization (WHO), other international bodies, and a list of consultants and contributors. In addition to the symposium summary, this booklet also contains contributions supplied by 28 experts from IAEA and WHO and a number of member states. (LK) 1;r;;;;Ii .7.1141 I . ; .41fi- W....ACA:11=0d se: '. ID fir ;.. tai 7S. .1- .-=4.,.!`'.1-141.;1..7. "41 *rk'et's, et U S [APARTMENT OF HEALTH. EDUCATION & WELFARE V, OFFICE OF EDUCATION Vi THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRO- OUCED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROM THE PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIG- CO INATING IT POINTS OF VIEW OR MIN- IONS STATED 00 NOT NECESSARILY C=i REPRESENT OFFICIAL OFFICE OF EOLI- La CATION POSITION OR POLICY a a Ai a S a "44;7 1/4411110. nuclearpower and the environment Prepared by the IAEA in co-operation with WHO Printed by the IAEA in Austria table of contents MeV The Role of Atomic Energy in Meeting Future Power Needs 1 Future World Energy Needs the role of World Energy Resources The Projected Role of Nuclear Power atonic me The Nuclear Fuel Cycle 4 Environmental Aspects of Nuclear Power Production 5 meeting Radioactivity Transportation finuture Decommissioning of Nuclear Installations power needs Radiation Protection Standards 8 radiation Basic Radiation Concepts 10 Biological Effects of Radiation 10 Basic Radiation Protection Standards 11 protection Derived Release Limits .13 Natural Radioactivity 14 standffds ManMade Sources of Radiation Exposure 15 Safe Handling of Radioactive Materials 19 safe handling Mining, Milling, Enrichment and Fuel Fabrication 20 Nuclear Power Plants 21 Sources of Radioactivity of radioactive Radioactive Waste Generation and Management Boiling Water Reactors Pressurized Water Reactors materials Gas Cooled Reactors Heavy Water Reactors Fast Breeder Reactors Accident Considerations 39 Accident Prevention Accident Mitigation Typical Accidents Emergency Planning Site Characteristics Operating Experience in the United States Fuel Reprocessing 47 Origins and Types of Effluents and Wastes Control of Effluents and Wastes Transportation 52 .5 1 Other Impacts 55 other Plant Construction 55 Transmission Lines 55 Thermal Discharges 55 impacts Comparison of Thermal Release from Fossil-fuelled and Nuclear Plants Cooling Water Sources and Methods of Heat Disposal Physical Behaviour of Heated Discharges Thermal Effects on Biota and Ecology Public Health Considerations 61 Nuclear Power Generation 61 public Mining Milling, Enrichment and Fuel Fabrication Reactors health Normal operations Accidental events Thermal aspects considerationsChemical aspects Fuel Reprocessing Transportation Public Health and Safety Programmes 69 Operational Health and Safety Programmes The Role of Health Authorities The Role of International Organizations Summary 75 Annex I. Pertinent Publications of the International Atomic Energy Agency_80 Annex II. Pertinent Publications of the World Health Organization 83 Annex I I I. Pertinent Publications of other International Bodies 83 List of Consultants and Contributors 85 Power demands solar energy; but these have not yet been de- broughout the world veloped to a point at which their widespread use in are increasing: the next few decades can be foreseen. energy is essential The nuclear power industry has been developing to assure public healthin an era in which much attention is given and to provide for the quality of life to which man to the preservation of public health aspires. Nuclear energy, based on fiction, is in and environmental quality. No industry, including a position to fill these needs with less detriment to the nuclear industry, can truthfully claim to the environment than most fossil fuels. be free from all public health and In the longer term man may need to evolve other environmental effects, but the nuclear industry has source' of power such as fusion energy or given serious attention to these problems. 4 Probably more factual information on the effects and compiled by Dr. D.G. Jacobs, who served as of radioactivity has been compiled than for scientific secretary. A second consultants' any other potential pollutant. meeting was convened in January 1972 to review the assembled draft. (A list of consultants Biologists have shown that radiation doses as low and contributors is given at the end.) as 0.5 to 1.0 rad per day administered continuously can give rise to Compilation of the booklet presented a number of observable genetic and somatic effects in small difficulties. The time period between its mammals. These levels are about a factor conception and its desired date of completion of 1000 higher than the ICRP annual dose limits forwas quite short, especially in view of the number of the general public, and nearly 10 million contributions received. There was an attempt times as high as the average radiation dose to compile a manuscript which was uniform increment resulting at present from the operation while at the same time maintaining the character of of nuclear installations. At the very low levels the various contributions. of radiation to which members of the Further, the interests and technical background public are exposed the frequency of effects is so of the prospective audience low as to be not observable; as a result it is presents a broader spectrum than one would possible neither to prove nor to disprove normally try to cover the actual occurrence of effects at these levels. with a single publication. As a result there is Radiation protection standards are set on the basis that the effects may occur at low dosesmore repetition and parallel material in the booklet than one might hope to find in proportion to the effects observed at higher though in part this is deliberate. For example, the dose rates, but evidence exists to suggest that the effects occur with even less frequency, if at all. third chapter contains more operational details than most readers would require, and we A similar situation exists with respect to accidents. suggest that this chapter could be omitted by non- Although there have been malfunctions of specialists. The information presented may be nuclear power reactors, in no case has of considerable interest, however, to others u.: re been a release of radioactivity to the environ- in the intended audience. The first part of the fifth ment ;n amounts large enough to result in an chapter closely parallels Chapter III with regard overexposure of the public. Because of the excel- to the topics discussed, but the discussions lent recori of safety that has been attained, take the form primarily of an evaluation of the it is not pinsible to establish quantitatively what public health and environmental aspects of the probe aility of a major reactor accident the various operations rather than a description of is, excer that it is certainly very low. operations and procedures. We are hopeful that Eng:l.r.dered safety features continue to be developedin spite of its admitted shortcomings the to improve even further the reliability of booklet will be useful to those interested in a sum- V reactors to operate without incident. mary view of the public health and environ- mental aspects of nuclear power production. Interest in the environmental aspects of nuclear power stations led the International No one can profess to be able to quantify at this Atomic Energy Agency, in co-operation with the time all of the public health and environ- United States Atomic Energy Commission, mental effects of nuclear power for the future. to convene a symposium in New York The attitude of the nuclear power industry on this topic in August 1970. The enthusiastic is to proceed with due caution after giving con- response both during and after that meeting, and sideration to all facets thought to be the interest in environmental matters potentially detrimental. Concurrently, programmes evidenced by the convening of the United Nations are conducted to advance our knowledge V Conference on the Human Environment of the impact of the industry and to in 1972, led to the decision to summarize the improve further its safety aspects, with continued information presented in New York in a condensedperiodic reviews on the basis of new and readily understandable form for those information. to view of their responsibility not engaged directly in this field of to protect the health of populations, public health work. The World Health Organization has co- authorities are following continuously operated in the preparation of this booklet, which the development of new sources of power and is the result. It was planned at a consultants' their effects on the human environment. meeting convened in Vienna in June 1971. The nuclear industry has achieved a commendable Following this meeting contributions to the bookletsafety record to date, and it hopes to continue were supplied by 28 experts from the IAEA to set an example of thorough attention and WHO and a number of Member States, to safety which other industries may follow.
Recommended publications
  • Security Operational Skills 2 (Tracing).P65
    Unit - 4 K Operating Skill for handling Natural Disasters Structure 4.1 Objectives 4.2 Introduction 4.3 Operating Skill for natural and nuclear disasters 4.4 Accident Categories 4.5 Nuclear and radiation accidents and incidents 4.6 Geological disasters 4.7 Operating Skills for handling Mines and other Explosive Devices 4.8 Operating Skills for handing hijacking situation (other than an airline hijacking 4.9 Operating skills for antivehicle theft operations 4.10 Operating skills for facing a kidnapping or hostage situation 4.11 Operating Skill for handling coal mines and other explosive devices 4.12 Hostage Rights : Law and Practice in Throes of Evolution 4.12.1 Terminology 4.13 Relative Value of Rights 4.14 Conflict of Rights and Obligations 4.15 Hong Kong mourns victims of bus hijacking in the Philoppines 4.16 Rules for Successful Threat Intelligence Teams 4.16.1 Tailor Your Talent 4.16.2 Architect Your Infrastructure 4.16.3 Enable Business Profitability 4.16.4 Communicate Continuously 4.17 Construction Safety Practices 4.17.1 Excavation 4.17.2 Drilling and Blasting 4.17.3 Piling and deep foundations 234 4.18 Planning 4.18.1 Steps in Planning Function 4.18.2 Characteristics of planning 4.18.3 Advantages of planning 4.18.4 Disadvantages of planning 4.1 Objectives The following is a list of general objectives departments should consider when creating an Information Disaster Prevention and Recovery Plan: O Ensure the safety of all employees and visitors at the site/facility O Protect vital information and records O Secure business sites
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Association for Prevention of War BRIEFING PAPER
    Medical Association for Prevention of War BRIEFING PAPER NUCLEAR POWER AND PUBLIC HEALTH By Peter Karamoskos MBBS, FRANZCR1 May 2010 “… there is a linear dose-response relationship between exposure to ionizing radiation and the development of solid cancers in humans. It is unlikely that there is a threshold below which cancers are not induced.” – National Academy of Science, BEIR VII report, 2006 “We need to develop a very firm commitment to the elimination of nuclear power as a source of energy on the earth.” – Russell Train, former US Environmental Protection Agency administrator, 1977 “[t]he [economic] failure of the U.S. nuclear power program ranks as the largest managerial disaster in business history, a disaster on a monumental scale.” – Forbes, 1985 1 Nuclear Radiologist; Treasurer, Medical Association for the Prevention of War (MAPW) & Treasurer, International Campaign for the Abolition of Nuclear Weapons (ICAN); Public representative, Radiation Health Committee, Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA) [For informational purposes and does not represent an endorsement by ARPANSA of this document.] Medical Association for Prevention of War Introduction without heavy tax-payer subsidies and loan The public health implications for a resurgence of guarantees. Throughout this period however, nuclear power appear to have taken a subordinate public health concerns increased on a backdrop of position to the economic and global warming reactor safety concerns and the effects of ionising arguments that the industry has advanced to radiation on the surrounding populations, with ten justify its expansion. The purpose of this essay core meltdowns in various nuclear reactors, therefore is several-fold: to review the scientific including several in nuclear power reactors, evidence for public health impacts of nuclear culminating in the Chernobyl disaster of 1986.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning from Fukushima: Nuclear Power in East Asia
    LEARNING FROM FUKUSHIMA NUCLEAR POWER IN EAST ASIA LEARNING FROM FUKUSHIMA NUCLEAR POWER IN EAST ASIA EDITED BY PETER VAN NESS AND MEL GURTOV WITH CONTRIBUTIONS FROM ANDREW BLAKERS, MELY CABALLERO-ANTHONY, GLORIA KUANG-JUNG HSU, AMY KING, DOUG KOPLOW, ANDERS P. MØLLER, TIMOTHY A. MOUSSEAU, M. V. RAMANA, LAUREN RICHARDSON, KALMAN A. ROBERTSON, TILMAN A. RUFF, CHRISTINA STUART, TATSUJIRO SUZUKI, AND JULIUS CESAR I. TRAJANO Published by ANU Press The Australian National University Acton ACT 2601, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at press.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: Learning from Fukushima : nuclear power in East Asia / Peter Van Ness, Mel Gurtov, editors. ISBN: 9781760461393 (paperback) 9781760461409 (ebook) Subjects: Nuclear power plants--East Asia. Nuclear power plants--Risk assessment--East Asia. Nuclear power plants--Health aspects--East Asia. Nuclear power plants--East Asia--Evaluation. Other Creators/Contributors: Van Ness, Peter, editor. Gurtov, Melvin, editor. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by ANU Press. Cover image: ‘Fukushima apple tree’ by Kristian Laemmle-Ruff. Near Fukushima City, 60 km from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant, February 2014. The number in the artwork is the radioactivity level measured in the orchard—2.166 microsieverts per hour, around 20 times normal background radiation. This edition © 2017 ANU Press Contents Figures . vii Tables . ix Acronyms and abbreviations .
    [Show full text]
  • Benefit-Function of Two- Identical Cold Standby Nuclear Reactors System Subject to Failure Due to Radioactivity Or Overheating, Steam Explosion, Fire, and Meltdown
    International Journal on Mechanical Engineering and Robotics (IJMER) ________________________________________________________________________________________________ Benefit-Function of Two- Identical Cold Standby Nuclear Reactors System subject to failure due to radioactivity or Overheating, steam explosion, fire, and meltdown Ashok Kumar Saini BLJS COLLEGE, TOSHAM (BHIWANI) HARYANA INDIA Email ID [email protected] The accident killed 30 people directly and damaged Abstract- A nuclear and radiation accident is defined by approximately $7 billion of property. A study published in the International Atomic Energy Agency as "an event that 2005 estimates that there will eventually be up to 4,000 has led to significant consequences to people, the additional cancer deaths related to the accident among environment or the facility." Examples include lethal those exposed to significant radiation levels. Radioactive effects to individuals, large radioactivity release to fallout from the accident was concentrated in areas of the environment, or reactor core melt." The prime Belarus, Ukraine and Russia. Approximately 350,000 example of a "major nuclear accident" is one in which people were forcibly resettled away from these areas soon a reactor core is damaged and significant amounts after the accident. of radioactivity are released, such as in the Chernobyl disaster in 1986. Benjamin K. Sovacool has reported that worldwide there have been 99 accidents at nuclear power plants from 1952 The impact of nuclear accidents has been a topic of debate to 2009 (defined as incidents that either resulted in the loss practically since the first nuclear reactors were constructed of human life or more than US$50,000 of property damage, in 1954. It has also been a key factor in public concern the amount the US federal government uses to define about nuclear facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Consequence Management: Evaluating and Developing International Responses to Nuclear and Radiological Disasters
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Dissertations and Theses City College of New York 2015 Consequence Management: Evaluating and Developing International Responses to Nuclear and Radiological Disasters Timothy Taylor CUNY City College How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/cc_etds_theses/365 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] Consequence Management: Evaluating and Developing International Responses to Nuclear and Radiological Disasters By Timothy Taylor May 2015 Master’s Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of International Relations (MA) at the City College of New York Advisor: Jean Krasno, PhD 1 Acknowledgments This research could not have happened without the inspiration and help of so many people. First and foremost, I want to acknowledge my academic and thesis advisor, Dr. Jean Krasno, for being a driving force for this research, as well as for my academic and professional success. Her level of knowledge and expertise within the field of International Relations is only surpassed by her love and compassion for others, especially those whom she inspires through her teaching. I would also like to acknowledge Dr. Barry J. Balleck for pushing me as an undergraduate student to pursue research and a graduate degree. Dr. Balleck helped me to hone my research and writing skills in International Studies, and to analyze critical global issues as a policy-maker. I will always value my friendship with him and the Balleck family.
    [Show full text]
  • Ornl/Nsic-176
    4 ggcBvePBtnc APR 291980 ORNL/NSIC-176 MASTER Descriptions of Selected Accidents that Have Occurred at Nuclear Reactor Facilities H. W. Bertini and Members of the Staff of the Nuclear Safety Information Center NUCLFAR SAFETY INFORMATION CENTER DIEmu'lhj \i 'uNLIMIlt.il c ORNL/NSIC-176 Contract No. W-7405-eng-26 Engineering Technology Division DESCRIPTIONS OF SFLEuTED ACCIDENTS THAT HAVE OCCURRED AT NUCLEAR REACTOR FACILITIES H. W. Bertini and Members of the Staff of the Nuclear Safety Information Center Date Published: April 1980 Prepared by the OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORArORY Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830 operated by UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION for the DEPARTMENT OP ENERGY tP MTOWiOtl Cf THIS MCU«»T It IHWWTW iii CONTENTS (7 Page FOREWORD ...» v PREFACE . vli 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. NUCLEAR REACTORS: FUNDAMENTALS .' 3 2.1 Basic Theory 3 2.2 The Components of a Nuclear Reactor 8 2.3 Radioactivity , 11 2.4 Electric Power Plants .... 16 2.5 Classification of Reactors 17 2.6 Light-Water Reactors for the Production of Electricity ..... 19 3. CENTRAL STATION POWER PLANTS. 32 3.1 Fuel Melting Incideat at the Fermi Reactor (1966) 32 3.2 Electrical Cable Fires at San Onofre 1 (1968) 33 3.3 Fuel Meltdown at St. Laurent (1969) 35 3.4 Uncovering of the Core at La Crosse (1970) 38 3.5 Seven Injured When Steam Nozzle Breaks at Robinson 2 (1970) 39 3.6 Discharge of Primary System into Drywell at Did 'en 2 (1970) 42 3.7 Turbine Damage Caused by Human Error at Robinson 2 (1970) 45 3.8 Construction Fire at Indian Point 2 (1971) 46 3.9 Valve Separations at Turkey Point 3 (1971) 47 3.10 Turbine Basement Flooded at Quad Cities V?I2) 48 3.11 Steam Generator Damaged in Hot Tests at Oconee 1 (1972) 49 3.12 Two Fatalities in Steam Line Accident at Surry 1 (1972) 50 3.13 Seawater Intrusion into Primary System at Millstone 1 (1972) ..
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Association for Prevention of War1.34 MB
    LC EPC Inquiry into Nuclear Prohibition submission 34 Medical Association for Prevention of War (Australia) Submission to the Inquiry into potential benefits to Victoria in removing prohibitions enacted by the Nuclear Activities (Prohibitions) Act 1983. February 2020 mapw.org.au | [email protected] | 03 9023 1958 3 of 23 LC EPC Inquiry into Nuclear Prohibition Submission to the Inquiry into potential benefits to Victoria in removing prohibitions enacted by the Nuclear 2 submission 34 Activities (Prohibitions) Act 1983 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................... 4 NUCLEAR POWER AND NUCLEAR WEAPONS ................................................................................................ 5 NUCLEAR POWER AND RADIATION IMPACTS ............................................................................................... 6 Children’s increased cancer risks ..................................................................................................................... 7 Childhood leukaemia near nuclear power plants ...................................................................................... 7 Childhood cancer and CT scans ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Heavy Water Reactors: Status and Projected Development Designed in the Russian Federation
    01-01915_TRS407.qxd 17.04.2002 14:04 Uhr Seite 1 Technical Reports Series No. This report commences with a review of the historical development of heavy water reactors (HWRs), detailing the various national efforts made in developing reactor concepts and taking them to the stage of prototype operation or commercial viability. Sections cover HWR economics, safety and fuel cycles. 4 0 7 Technical Reports Series No. 407 The future directions likely to be taken in the development of HWR technology are addressed through discussion of three national programmes: the Canadian CANDU design, the Advanced HWR currently under development in India, and an 'Ultimate Safe' reactor being Reactors: Status and Projected Development Heavy Water designed in the Russian Federation. Heavy Water Reactors: Status and Projected Development ISBN 92–0–111502–4 ISSN 0074–1914 €99.00 INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, VIENNA, 2002 HEAVY WATER REACTORS: STATUS AND PROJECTED DEVELOPMENT The following States are Members of the International Atomic Energy Agency: AFGHANISTAN GREECE PARAGUAY ALBANIA GUATEMALA PERU ALGERIA HAITI PHILIPPINES ANGOLA HOLY SEE POLAND ARGENTINA HUNGARY PORTUGAL ARMENIA ICELAND QATAR AUSTRALIA INDIA REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AUSTRIA INDONESIA ROMANIA AZERBAIJAN IRAN, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF RUSSIAN FEDERATION BANGLADESH IRAQ SAUDI ARABIA BELARUS IRELAND SENEGAL BELGIUM ISRAEL SIERRA LEONE BENIN ITALY SINGAPORE BOLIVIA JAMAICA SLOVAKIA BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA JAPAN SLOVENIA BRAZIL JORDAN SOUTH AFRICA BULGARIA KAZAKHSTAN SPAIN BURKINA FASO KENYA SRI LANKA
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Power in East Asia, Edited by Peter Van Ness and Mel Gurtov, Published 2017 by ANU Press, the Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
    10 Decommissioning nuclear power reactors Kalman A . Robertson Abstract Global demand for decommissioning services is poised to rise rapidly over the next 20 years, creating major technical and administrative challenges for a large number of states and operators that have only limited experience in this field. This chapter explains the radiological risks associated with each step from shutting down a reactor to releasing the former reactor site for a new use . The selection of a strategy for decommissioning a reactor involves competing policy imperatives that may be assessed in light of two key principles related to funding decommissioning and assuring safety, inter-generational equity and the polluter/user pays principle . Based on an assessment of current trends in decommissioning, there are opportunities to improve cost estimates for decommissioning and strengthen international cooperation to meet rising demand . Risk communication and public participation also warrant special attention due to the highly technical nature of the risks associated with decommissioning and remediation of reactor sites . Introduction As commercial nuclear power generation enters its seventh decade, the world is set to undergo an unprecedented increase in the number of reactors requiring decommissioning. The combination of ageing reactor 287 LEARNING FROM FUKUSHIMA fleets and early shutdowns will see a doubling in the number of reactors undergoing decommissioning within the next 20 years, and it is projected to create a global market for decommissioning and waste storage worth over US$100 billion by 2030 (Nucleonics Week 2016). In principle, many of the risks to nuclear safety associated with a reactor site progressively decrease as it is shut down and decommissioned.
    [Show full text]
  • Mobilizing After Disasters in Advanced Industrial Democracies
    MOBILIZING AFTER DISASTERS IN ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL DEMOCRACIES by MIRIAM MATEJOVA B.A. (Honours), University of Northern British Columbia, 2009 M.A., Norman Paterson School of International Affairs, Carleton University, 2012 A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE AND POSTDOCTORAL STUDIES (Political Science) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) April 2019 © Miriam Matejova, 2019 The following individuals certify that they have read, and recommend to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies for acceptance, the dissertation entitled: Mobilizing after disasters in advanced industrial democracies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for submitted by Miriam Matejova the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science Examining Committee: Peter Dauvergne Supervisor Lisa McIntosh Sundstrom Supervisory Committee Member Catherine Corrigall-Brown Supervisory Committee Member Brian Job University Examiner Terre Satterfield University Examiner Additional Supervisory Committee Members: Supervisory Committee Member Supervisory Committee Member ii Abstract Environmental disasters are frequently catalysts for social and political change. Yet, disasters of similar scale and impact seem to encourage collective action in some cases but fail to do so in others. For example, while some large oil spills have generated mass nationwide (and international) protests, others have gone largely unnoticed and protests, if any, remained small and localized. If disasters are political triggering events, as the existing literature suggests, why do they often fail to generate large scale collective action? In fact, why do some highly damaging industrial environmental disasters succeed, and others fail to catalyze protest movements? This research strives to explain a variation in the occurrence and size of non-violent protest after industrial environmental disasters in advanced democracies.
    [Show full text]
  • Switzerland CNPP.Pdf
    SWITZERLAND 2012 1. GENERAL INFORMATION 1.1. Country overview Switzerland is one of the most mountainous countries in Europe, with more than 70% of its area covered by the Alps and the Jura. It has 7,870,134 (2010 data) inhabitants, with an overall population density of about 191 people per km2. The major language communities are: German, French, Italian, and Romansh. Foreign nationals and their families make up roughly 22% of the population. Sources: Federal Statistical Office, http://www.bfs.admin.ch, 11 April 2012 1.1.1. Governmental System Switzerland is a federal state, with three political and legal levels: the communes (2551, 2011 data), the cantons (26) and the Confederation. The Swiss parliament, or Federal Assembly, is made up of two chambers: the National Council and the Council of States. Every four years, the people elect the 200 members of the National Council, most recently in October 2011. The government is made up of seven members, elected by the United Federal Assembly. Sources: The Federal Authorities of the Swiss Confederation, http://www.admin.ch, 11 April 2012 1.1.2. Geography and Climate Switzerland covers an area of 41,285 km2, comprising 31% forest and grove, 37% cropland and pastureland, 7% built-up and 25% un-productive land (situation in the mid-1990s). Around 4% of the country’s surface area is covered by water. Climatic conditions, average temperature and precipitation patterns vary significantly across Switzerland, depending mainly on altitude and location. Sources: Federal Statistical Office, http://www.bfs.admin.ch, 11 April 2012 Federal Office for the Environment, http://www.bafu.admin.ch, 11 April 2012 1.1.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Calls Are Closer Than Others
    HDT WHAT? INDEX SOME CALLS ARE CLOSER THAN OTHERS CLOSE CALLS There was a steam explosion and fire in an atomic pile at Leipzig shortly after Werner Heisenberg and Robert Döpel had used it to generate Nazi Germany’s 1st signals of neutron propagation. While checking their device for a possible heavy-water leak, air June 23, 1942 got in and the device’s uranium powder ignited. This caused the water jacket to boil and generated enough steam pressure to blow the pile apart, scattering burning ura- nium powder throughout the lab. There was an unexpected criticality nuclear reaction at the Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory. The material went beyond criticality into prompt-criticality, which is the February 11, 1945 next stage after criticality in the generation of a bomb-like nuclear detonation. This was the 1st time in the history of the US’s nuclear program that such a supremely dan- gerous Chernobyl-like event had occurred in the laboratory. At the Omega site in Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico, Harry K. Dagh- lian, Jr. inadvertently creating a critical mass when he dropped a tungsten carbide August 21, 1945 brick onto a plutonium core. Although he quickly removed the brick he had been fatally irradiated, and would die on September 15th. At Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico there was another accidental criti- cality. Demonstrating his technique for the benefit of 7 visitors, Louis Slotin used a screwdriver to manually assemble a critical mass of plutonium. His hand slipped. May 21, 1946 He received an estimated dose of 1,000 rads (rad), or 10 grays (Gy) and would die on May 30th.
    [Show full text]