Hua Hin Travel Guide
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Bibliography
Bibliography Many books were read and researched in the compilation of Binford, L. R, 1983, Working at Archaeology. Academic Press, The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology: New York. Binford, L. R, and Binford, S. R (eds.), 1968, New Perspectives in American Museum of Natural History, 1993, The First Humans. Archaeology. Aldine, Chicago. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Braidwood, R 1.,1960, Archaeologists and What They Do. Franklin American Museum of Natural History, 1993, People of the Stone Watts, New York. Age. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Branigan, Keith (ed.), 1982, The Atlas ofArchaeology. St. Martin's, American Museum of Natural History, 1994, New World and Pacific New York. Civilizations. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Bray, w., and Tump, D., 1972, Penguin Dictionary ofArchaeology. American Museum of Natural History, 1994, Old World Civiliza Penguin, New York. tions. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Brennan, L., 1973, Beginner's Guide to Archaeology. Stackpole Ashmore, w., and Sharer, R. J., 1988, Discovering Our Past: A Brief Books, Harrisburg, PA. Introduction to Archaeology. Mayfield, Mountain View, CA. Broderick, M., and Morton, A. A., 1924, A Concise Dictionary of Atkinson, R J. C., 1985, Field Archaeology, 2d ed. Hyperion, New Egyptian Archaeology. Ares Publishers, Chicago. York. Brothwell, D., 1963, Digging Up Bones: The Excavation, Treatment Bacon, E. (ed.), 1976, The Great Archaeologists. Bobbs-Merrill, and Study ofHuman Skeletal Remains. British Museum, London. New York. Brothwell, D., and Higgs, E. (eds.), 1969, Science in Archaeology, Bahn, P., 1993, Collins Dictionary of Archaeology. ABC-CLIO, 2d ed. Thames and Hudson, London. Santa Barbara, CA. Budge, E. A. Wallis, 1929, The Rosetta Stone. Dover, New York. Bahn, P. -
A Way of Communication to Build Peaceful
2019 PROCEEDINGS 14th International Conference on Language, Innovation, Culture and Education (ICLICE) 3rd International Research Conference on Management, Leadership & Social Sciences (IRCMALS) MARRIOTT COURTYARD SEOUL NAMDAEMUN , SEOUL 14-15 JUNE, 2019 CO- SPONSORS; Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Language, Innovation, Culture and Education (ICLICE) & 3rd International Research Conference on Management, Leadership & Social Sciences (IRCMALS), 2019 Editors Lokman Abd Wahid Fazidah Fariyah Md Ali Salahuddin Ismail Mohd Iskandar Abdul Wahab Publisher: Infobase Creation Sdn Bhd © Copyright 2019 by Infobase Creation Sdn Bhd All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form, by photocopy, microfilm, xerography, or any other means, or incorporated into any information retrieval system, electronic or mechanical, without the written permission of the copyright owner. Disclaimer: The opinions, advices and information contained in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the publisher, organizer or co-sponsors of the conference. Whilst all due care was taken in the compilation of these proceedings, the organizers does not warrant that the information is free from errors or omission, or accept any liability in relation to the quality, accuracy and currency of the information. Articles are also not final and subject to modifications by respective authors. Please contact the individual authors for referencing purposes. All enquiries should be addressed to: ICSAI Secretariat c/o -
The Aslian Languages of Malaysia and Thailand: an Assessment
Language Documentation and Description ISSN 1740-6234 ___________________________________________ This article appears in: Language Documentation and Description, vol 11. Editors: Stuart McGill & Peter K. Austin The Aslian languages of Malaysia and Thailand: an assessment GEOFFREY BENJAMIN Cite this article: Geoffrey Benjamin (2012). The Aslian languages of Malaysia and Thailand: an assessment. In Stuart McGill & Peter K. Austin (eds) Language Documentation and Description, vol 11. London: SOAS. pp. 136-230 Link to this article: http://www.elpublishing.org/PID/131 This electronic version first published: July 2014 __________________________________________________ This article is published under a Creative Commons License CC-BY-NC (Attribution-NonCommercial). The licence permits users to use, reproduce, disseminate or display the article provided that the author is attributed as the original creator and that the reuse is restricted to non-commercial purposes i.e. research or educational use. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ ______________________________________________________ EL Publishing For more EL Publishing articles and services: Website: http://www.elpublishing.org Terms of use: http://www.elpublishing.org/terms Submissions: http://www.elpublishing.org/submissions The Aslian languages of Malaysia and Thailand: an assessment Geoffrey Benjamin Nanyang Technological University and Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore 1. Introduction1 The term ‘Aslian’ refers to a distinctive group of approximately 20 Mon- Khmer languages spoken in Peninsular Malaysia and the isthmian parts of southern Thailand.2 All the Aslian-speakers belong to the tribal or formerly- 1 This paper has undergone several transformations. The earliest version was presented at the Workshop on Endangered Languages and Literatures of Southeast Asia, Royal Institute of Linguistics and Anthropology, Leiden, in December 1996. -
Official Proceedings International Conference Researching Language, Culture, and Society (Rlcs 2018)
OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE RESEARCHING LANGUAGE, CULTURE, AND SOCIETY (RLCS 2018) Hosted by: Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Mahasarakham University Maha Sarakham, Thailand The Research Institute of Northeastern Art and Culture Mahasarakham University Maha Sarakham, Thailand University of East Asia Yamaguchi, Japan Dates: February 23, 2018 Venue: Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Mahasarakham University Maha Sarakham, Thailand INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 2 RESEARCHING LANGUAGE, CULTURE, AND SOCIETY (RLCS 2018) Editorial Board 1. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Lindsay Miller University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 2. Prof. Dr. Leo H. Aberion University of San Jose-Recoletos, The Philippines 3. Dr. John C. Helper Washington College, USA 4. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ryuen Hiramatsu University of East Asia, Japan 5. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Hoang Thi Hue Hue University’s College of Education, Vietnam 6. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Pathom Hongsuwan Mahasarakham University, Thailand 7. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Somchai Phatharathananunth Mahasarakham University, Thailand 8. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Thananan Trongdee Mahasarakham University, Thailand 9. Asst. Prof. Dr. Kanokporn Rattanasuteerakul Mahasarakham University, Thailand 10. Asst. Prof. Dr. Somkiet Poopatwiboon Mahasarakham University, Thailand 11. Asst. Prof. Dr. Wilailak Onchit Mahasarakham University, Thailand 12. Asst. Prof. Dr. Savittri Ratanopad Suwanlee Mahasarakham University, Thailand 13. Asst. Prof. Dr. Chalong Phanchan Mahasarakham University, Thailand 14. Asst. Prof. Dr. Theera Roungtheera Mahasarakham -
Aslian: Mon-Khmer of the Malay Peninsula
1 Aslian: Mon-Khmer of the Malay Peninsula. James A. Matisoff University of California, Berkeley Depending from the Southeast Asian mainland like “a long-necked bottle or an Indian club,”1 the Malay Peninsula lies in tropical splendor, separated from the island of Sumatra by the peaceful tidal waters of the Strait of Malacca. In the geological past, before the sinking of the Sunda Shelf, the west (‘Selangor’) coast of Malaya and the east coast of Sumatra were in fact connected by land—and at an even earlier period the two coastlines must have fit neatly together like pieces of a jigsaw puzzle (see Map 1). * This monograph was originally written in 1982-83, almost twenty years ago now, with the intention of incorporating it into the Mon-Khmer chapter of my long-suffering book, Languages of Mainland Southeast Asia. This book, to be published eventually in the Language Surveys series (familiarly know as the “green books”) by Cambridge University Press, is still far from completion, but will hopefully appear sometime during the 21st century. Meanwhile it has become clear that this study of the Aslian branch of Mon-Khmer is far too long and detailed to serve merely as part of a single chapter of a general book on Southeast Asian languages. However, in view of the fact that no other overall treatment of the Aslian languages has appeared in the past 20 years, perhaps the time has come to publish it separately. Since I am certainly no specialist in Mon-Khmer, I have obviously had to rely on the true masters of the field, especially the works of the two preeminent Aslianists, Gérard Diffloth and Geoffrey Benjamin, both of whom have been kind enough to approve of my attempts to summarize their research. -
Human Origin Sites and the World Heritage Convention in Eurasia
World Heritage papers41 HEADWORLD HERITAGES 4 Human Origin Sites and the World Heritage Convention in Eurasia VOLUME I In support of UNESCO’s 70th Anniversary Celebrations United Nations [ Cultural Organization Human Origin Sites and the World Heritage Convention in Eurasia Nuria Sanz, Editor General Coordinator of HEADS Programme on Human Evolution HEADS 4 VOLUME I Published in 2015 by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 7, place de Fontenoy, 75352 Paris 07 SP, France and the UNESCO Office in Mexico, Presidente Masaryk 526, Polanco, Miguel Hidalgo, 11550 Ciudad de Mexico, D.F., Mexico. © UNESCO 2015 ISBN 978-92-3-100107-9 This publication is available in Open Access under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO (CC-BY-SA 3.0 IGO) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/igo/). By using the content of this publication, the users accept to be bound by the terms of use of the UNESCO Open Access Repository (http://www.unesco.org/open-access/terms-use-ccbysa-en). The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNESCO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The ideas and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors; they are not necessarily those of UNESCO and do not commit the Organization. Cover Photos: Top: Hohle Fels excavation. © Harry Vetter bottom (from left to right): Petroglyphs from Sikachi-Alyan rock art site. -
Sturtz Unr 0139M 13151.Pdf
University of Nevada, Reno A Natural and Cultural History of Leonard Rockshelter, Nevada A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Anthropology By Sara N. Sturtz Dr. Geoffrey Smith/Thesis Advisor May, 2020 THE GRADUATE SCHOOL We recommend that the thesis prepared under our supervision by entitled be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Advisor Committee Member Graduate School Representative David W. Zeh, Ph.D., Dean Graduate School i ABSTRACT Leonard Rockshelter (LRS) is located in Pershing County, Nevada. Robert Heizer excavated the site in 1950 and reported more than 2 m of stratified deposits from which he recovered a modest assemblage of perishable and lithic artifacts. Of interest to the University of Nevada Reno’s Great Basin Paleoindian Research Unit (GBPRU) was Heizer’s discovery of obsidian flakes in deposits dated to 11,199±570 14C BP (14,900- 11,610 cal BP). This possibility of a stratified Pleistocene occupation prompted the GBPRU to return to LRS in 2018 and 2019 for additional work, which produced few artifacts but a sizeable small mammal assemblage. In this thesis, I test two hypotheses: (1) the small mammal assemblage provides a paleoenvironmental record that demonstrates changing local conditions during the Terminal Pleistocene and Holocene; and (2) the shelter contains evidence of human occupation dating to the Terminal Pleistocene. My results demonstrate that the Early Holocene and initial Middle Holocene were more mesic than later periods. They also suggest that people did not occupy LRS until the Early Holocene, after which time they periodically returned to the site. -
Development of a Corpus for Southern Thai Dialect Speech Recognition: Design and Text Preparation
Development of a Corpus for Southern Thai Dialect Speech Recognition: Design and Text Preparation Sittichok Aunkaew † Montri Karnjanadecha ‡ Chai Wutiwiwatchai * †‡Department of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Prince of Songkla University, Hatyai, Songkhla 90112, Thailand *National Electronics and Computer Technology Center (NECTEC) 112 Phahonyothin Rd., Klong Nueng, Klong Luang, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand [email protected]†, [email protected]‡, [email protected]* Abstract enough that mutual intelligibility between users of the dialects can be problematic. This paper describes our progress on the development of a corpus, and offer language resources, for Southern Thai dialect. The existing LOTUS corpus for standard Thai speech recognition, developed by NECTEC, is unable to fulfill our needs since the Southern Thai dialect is different from standard Thai in many ways including pronunciation, its lexicon, and grammar. Thus, our aim is to design and prepare transcriptions of recorded read speech and broadcast news to build a Southern Thai Dialect Continuous Speech Recognition corpus. Keywords: Southern Thai Dialect, Speech Recognition, Speech Corpus, Language Resources 1 Introduction Figure 1. The Southern Thai Dialect in the Tai-Kadai language family (adapted Southern Thai Dialect (STD) or Dambro (Thai from [1]) pronunciation: [p ʰaːsǎː t ʰajtâ ːj]) is a member of the Thai language subgroup of the Tai group of the Tai–Kadai language family [1][2]. Figure 1 shows the family tree of the Tai-Kadai language. STD is spoken in the 14 southern provinces of Thailand and also in Amphoe Bang Saphan, in the central province of Prachuap Khiri Khan. A small number of Tai speakers can also be found in some border states of Malaysia, such as Kedah, Kelantan, Penang, and Perak [3][4][5]. -
Geomorphological Context and Formation History of Cloggs Cave
Geomorphological context and formation history of Cloggs Cave: What was the cave like when people inhabited it? Jean-Jacques Delannoy, Bruno David, Joanna Fresløv, Russell Mullett, Helen Green, Johan Berthet, Fiona Petchey, Lee Arnold, Rachel Wood, Matthew Mcdowell, et al. To cite this version: Jean-Jacques Delannoy, Bruno David, Joanna Fresløv, Russell Mullett, Helen Green, et al.. Geo- morphological context and formation history of Cloggs Cave: What was the cave like when peo- ple inhabited it?. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, Elsevier, 2020, 33, pp.102461. 10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102461. halshs-03115566 HAL Id: halshs-03115566 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03115566 Submitted on 22 Mar 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NoDerivatives| 4.0 International License Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 33 (2020) 102461 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jasrep Geomorphological context and formation history of Cloggs Cave: What was T the cave like when people inhabited it? ⁎ ⁎ Jean-Jacques Delannoya,b, , Bruno Davidb,c, , Joanna Fresløvd, Russell Mullettd, GunaiKurnai Land and Waters Aboriginal Corporationd, Helen Greenb,e, Johan Bertheta, Fiona Petcheyb,f, Lee J. -
Early and Middle Archaic Projectile Point Technologies in the Closed Basin Area of the San Luis Valley, Colorado
University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2001 Early and Middle Archaic projectile point technologies in the Closed Basin area of the San Luis Valley, Colorado Scott A. Des Planques The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Des Planques, Scott A., "Early and Middle Archaic projectile point technologies in the Closed Basin area of the San Luis Valley, Colorado" (2001). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 2124. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/2124 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Maureen and Mike MANSFIELD LIBRARY The University of Montana Permission is granted by the author to reproduce this material in its entirety, provided that this material is used for scholarly purposes and is properly cited in published works and reports. **Please check "Yes" or "No" and provide signature** Yes, I grant permission No, I do not grant permission Author's Signature; ^ P Date: 5Z£//ol ' Any copying for commercial purposes or financial gain may be undertaken only with the author's exphcit consent. MSThcsis\Mansfjeld Library Permission THE EARLY AND MIDDLE ARCHAIC PROJECTILE POINT TECHNOLOGIES IN THE CLOSED BASIN AREA OF THE SAN LUIS VALLEY, COLORADO by Scott A. -
The Terminal Pleistocene/Early Holocene Record in the Northwestern Great Basin: What We Know, What We Don't Know, and How We M
PALEOAMERICA, 2017 Center for the Study of the First Americans http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20555563.2016.1272395 Texas A&M University REVIEW ARTICLE The Terminal Pleistocene/Early Holocene Record in the Northwestern Great Basin: What We Know, What We Don’t Know, and How We May Be Wrong Geoffrey M. Smitha and Pat Barkerb aGreat Basin Paleoindian Research Unit, Department of Anthropology, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, USA; bNevada State Museum, Carson City, NV, USA ABSTRACT KEYWORDS The Great Basin has traditionally not featured prominently in discussions of how and when the New Great Basin; Paleoindian World was colonized; however, in recent years work at Oregon’s Paisley Five Mile Point Caves and archaeology; peopling of the other sites has highlighted the region’s importance to ongoing debates about the peopling of the Americas Americas. In this paper, we outline our current understanding of Paleoindian lifeways in the northwestern Great Basin, focusing primarily on developments in the past 20 years. We highlight several potential biases that have shaped traditional interpretations of Paleoindian lifeways and suggest that the foundations of ethnographically-documented behavior were present in the earliest period of human history in the region. 1. Introduction comprehensive review of Paleoindian archaeology was published two decades ago. We also highlight several The Great Basin has traditionally not been a focus of biases that have shaped traditional interpretations of Paleoindian research due to its paucity of stratified and early lifeways in the region. well-dated open-air sites, proboscidean kill sites, and demonstrable Clovis-aged occupations. Until recently, the region’s terminal Pleistocene/early Holocene (TP/ 2. -
Indigenous Education: the Malaysian Experience
REVITALIZING THE INDIGENOUS SEMAI ORANG ASLI LANGUAGE IN MALAYSIA Dr Alias Abd Ghani [email protected] Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia Abstract Much attention has been focused on the survival of indigenous language in recent years. Many experts on the area anticipate the demise of the majority of indigenous languages worldwide and have called on the need to address the loss of indigenous language. According to Reyhner, R (2007 ) many indigenous peoples of the world, lack what may be termed the effective right to save their languages and cultures i.e. access to the knowledge, strategies, and resources necessary to resist destruction of languages and cultures. This paper presents the findings of the initiatives made by the Semai Orang Asli community and the Ethnic Language Division, Curriculum Development Centre (CDC), Ministry of Education Malaysia in revitalizing the language through documentation and native language teaching in Semai schools throughout Malaysia. This is part of the proactive efforts made by the community by engaging themselves with relevant educational authority in safeguarding their language form endangerment. Keywords: Aslian language, indigenous minority (Orang Asli), language revitalization. 1.0 Introduction In the words of Rehyner (2007), language is irreplaceable cultural knowledge. It contains a significant part of the world’s knowledge and wisdom. When a language is lost, much of the knowledge that language represents is also gone. According to Krauss (2007) there are approximately six thousand languages still spoken by mankind, between twenty and fifty percent of the 6,000 are no longer spoken by children or will no longer be spoken by children by the end of this century.