Cronología De Lanzamientos Espaciales 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cronología De Lanzamientos Espaciales 1 Cronología de lanzamientos espaciales 1 Cronología de Lanzamientos Espaciales Año 1970 Copyright © 2009 by Eladio Miranda Batlle. All rights reserved. Los textos, imágenes y tablas que se encuentran en esta cronología cuentan con la autorización de sus propietarios para ser publicadas o se hace referencia a la fuente de donde se obtuvieron los mismos . Eladio Miranda Batlle [email protected] Cronología de lanzamientos espaciales 2 Contenido 1970 Abril Enero 03.04.70 Kosmos 329 (Zenit-2M #8, 09.01.70 Kosmos 318 (Zenit-2M #7 Gektor #8) Gektor #7) 07.04.70 14.01.70 Intelsat-3 6 Kosmos 330 (Tselina-O #6) 14.01.70 KH-8A 3/KH 8-25 08.04.70 Kosmos 331 (Zenit-4 #67) 15.01.70 1970-003B / 1970-004B 08.04.70 Vela 11 15.01.70 Kosmos 319 (DS-P1-Yu #29) Vela 12 16.01.70 Kosmos 320 (DS-MO #2) 08.04.70 Nimbus 4 20.01.70 Kosmos 321 (DS-U2-MG #1) Topo 1 (S70-3) 21.01.70 Kosmos 322 (Zenit-4 #65) 11.04.70 Kosmos 332 (Tsiklon #5) 23.01.70 Tiros M (ITOS 1) 11.04.70 Apollo 13 (CSM 109) Australis (Oscar 5, A-O-A) LEM 7 30.01.70 Kosmos (323a) (DS-P1-I #7) 15.04.70 KH-8A 4/KH 8-26 15.04.70 Kosmos 333 (Zenit-4M #4, Rotor #4) Febrero 23.04.70 Intelsat-3 7 23.04.70 Kosmos 334 (DS-P1-Yu #31) 04.02.70 SERT 2 23.04.70 06.02.70 Kosmos (323b) (E-8-5) DFH 1 10.02.70 Kosmos 323 (Zenit-4 #66) 24.04.70 Kosmos 335 (DS-U1-R #1) 11.02.70 DMSP-5A F1 25.04.70 Kosmos 336 (Strela-1M #1) 11-02.70 1970-012B Kosmos 337 (Strela-1M #2) Kosmos 338 (Strela-1M #3) 11.02.70 Ohsumi (#5) Kosmos 339 (Strela-1M #4) 16.02.70 Luna (16c) (E-8-5 #6) Kosmos 340 (Strela-1M #5) 19.02.70 Molniya-1 13 Kosmos 341 (Strela-1M #6) 27.02.70 Kosmos 324 (DS-P1-Yu #30) Kosmos 342 (Strela-1M #7) Kosmos 343 (Strela-1M #8) Marzo 28.04.70 Meteor-1 4 04.03.70 Kosmos 325 (Zenit-2 #72) Mayo 04.03.70 KH-4B 9 SSF-B 18/KH-4B 1109 12.05.70 Kosmos 344 (Zenit-2 #74) Subsatellite 20.05.70 KH-4B 10 10.03.70 Dial WIKA SSF-B 19 Dial MIKA 20.05.70 Kosmos 345 (Zenit-4 #68) 13.03.70 Kosmos 326 (Zenit-2 #73) 20.05.70 Doppler Beacon 2 17.03.70 Meteor-1 3 22.05.70 Kosmos (346) (DS-P1-Yu #32) 18.03.70 Kosmos 327 (DS-P1-I #8) 20.03.70 NATO 1 27.03.70 Kosmos 328 (Zenit-4MK #2, Junio Germes #) 01.06.70 Soyuz 9 10.06.70 Kosmos 346 (Zenit-4 #69) 12.06.70 Kosmos 347 (DS-P1-Yu #33) 12.06.70 STV 3 Eladio Miranda Batlle [email protected] Cronología de lanzamientos espaciales 3 13.06.70 Kosmos 348 (DS-U2-GK #2) 25.09.70 Kosmos 365 (OGCh #23) 17.06.70 Kosmos 349 (Zenit-4 #70) 25.09.70 SS (1) MU-4S-1 19.06.70 Rhyolite 1 - Aquacade 1 29.09.70 Molniya-1 15 23.06.70 Meteor-1 5 25.06.70 KH-8A 5/KH 8-27 Octubre 26.06.70 Kosmos 350 (Zenit-2M #9, Gektor #9) 01.10.70 Kosmos 366 (Zenit-2M #12, 26.06.70 Molniya-1 14 Gektor #12) 27.06.70 Kosmos 351 (DS-P1-Yu #34) 03.10.70 Kosmos 367 (US-A #1) 27.06.70 Kosmos (352) (Strela-2M #1) 08.10.70 Kosmos 369 (DS-P1-Yu #36) 08.10.70 Kosmos 368 (Zenit-2M #13, Julio Gektor #13) 09.10.70 OFO 1 07.07.70 Kosmos 352 (Zenit-4 #71) RM 1 09.07.70 Kosmos 353 (Zenit-2M #10, 09.10.70 Kosmos 370 (Zenit-4M #7, Gektor #10) Rotor #7) 21.07.70 Kosmos (354) (Zenit-4 #(72)) 12.10.70 Kosmos 371 (Tsiklon #7) 23.07.70 Intelsat-3 8 14.10.70 Interkosmos 4 (DS-U3-IK #2) 23.07.70 KH-4B 11 15.10.70 Meteor-1 6 28.07.70 Kosmos 354 (OGCh #22) 16.10.70 Kosmos 372 (Strela-2M #2) 20.10.70 Zond 8 (L1 13) 20.10.70 Kosmos 373 (I2M #3) Agosto 23.10.70 Kosmos 374 (I2P #4) 23.10.70 KH-8A 7KH 8-29 07.08.70 Kosmos 355 (Zenit-4 #72) 30.10.70 Kosmos 376 (Zenit-4M #8, 07.08.70 Interkosmos 3 (DS-U2-IK #1) Rotor #8) 10.08.70 Kosmos 356 (DS-U2-MG #2) 30.10.70 Kosmos 375 (I2P #5) 17.08.70 Venera 7 (V-70 #1) 18.08.70 KH-8A 6/KH 8-28 19.08.70 Skynet 1B 19.08.70 Kosmos 357 (DS-P1-Yu #35) Noviembre 20.08.70 Kosmos 358 22.08.70 Kosmos 359 (Venera (8a)) 06.11.70 DSP 1IMEWS 1 (V- 70 #2) 06.11.70 1970-093B / 1970-093C 26.08.70 Ferret 15 10.11.70 Luna 17 (Lunokhod 1) (E-8 #2) 27.08.70 Transit-O 19 11.11.70 Kosmos 377 (Zenit-2M #14, 29.08.70 Kosmos 360 (Zenit-4M #5, Gektor #14) Rotor #5) 17.11.70 Kosmos 378 (DS-U2-IP #1) 18.11.70 KH-4B 12 SSF-B 20 Septiembre 24.11.70 Kosmos 380 (DS-P1-Yu #37) 24.11.70 Kosmos 379 (L3 #1, T2K #1) 01.09.70 Canyon 3 27.11.70 Molniya-1 16 02.09.70 Orba (X 2) 30.11.70 OAO B R-2 Instrument Package 03.09.70 DMSP-5A F2 08.09.70 Kosmos 361 (Zenit-4M #6, Diciembre Rotor #6) 12.09.70 Luna 16 (E-8-5 #6) 02.12.70 Kosmos 381 (Ionofernaya) 16.09.70 Kosmos 362 (DS-P1-I #9) 02.12.70 Kosmos 382 (L1E 2K) 17.09.70 Kosmos 363 (Zenit-2M #11, 03.12.70 Kosmos 383 (Zenit-4MK #4, Gektor #11) Germes #) 22.09.70 Kosmos 364 (Zenit-4MK #3, 10.12.70 Kosmos 384 (Zenit-2M #15, Germes #) Gektor #15) Eladio Miranda Batlle [email protected] Cronología de lanzamientos espaciales 4 11.12.70 NOAA 1 (ITOS A) CEP 1 12.12.70 Kosmos 385 (Tsiklon #8) 12.12.70 Explorer 42 (SAS A) 24.12.70 PeoleUhuru 15.12.70 Kosmos 386 (Zenit-4M #9, Rotor #9) 16.12.70 Kosmos 387 (Tselina-O #7) 18.12.70 Kosmos 389 (Tselina-D #1) 18.12.70 Kosmos 388 (DS-P1-Yu #38) 23.12.70 Kosmos (390) (DS-P1-M #1) 25.12.70 Molniya-1 17 Eladio Miranda Batlle [email protected] Cronología de lanzamientos espaciales 5 Enero 1970 Launch Date: 1970-01-15 Launch Vehicle: Delta Launch Site: Cape Canaveral, United States Kosmos 318 (Zenit-2M #7 Mass: 810.0 kg Gektor #7) KH-8A 3/KH 8-25 Cosmos 318 was a third generation, low resolution Soviet photo surveillance satellite launched from the Baikonur This US Air Force photo surveillance cosmodrome aboard a Soyuz rocket. satellite was launched from Vandenberg AFB aboard a Titan 3B rocket. It was a Launch Date: 1970-01-09 KH-8 (Key Hole-8) type spacecraft. Launch Vehicle: Soyuz Launch Site: Plesetsk, U.S.S.R Mass: 5700.0 kg Intelsat-3 6 Foto:KH-8A 26 [USAF] Launch Date: 1970-01-14 Launch Vehicle: Titan Launch Site: Vandenberg AFB, United States Intelsat 3 F-6 was launched by NASA for Mass: 3000.0 kg Communications Satellite Corporation. It was part of COMSAT's operational commercial 1970-003B / 1970-004B communications satellite system. Intesat-3 spacecraft were spin stabilized with a despun antenna structure (34 inch tall antenna). Launch Date: 1970-01-15 Launch Vehicle: Delta Hydrazine propulsion system with 4 thrusters Launch Site: Cape Canaveral, United States and 4 tanks. Passive thermal control. Body mounted solar cells produced 178 W peak, 9 AHr NiCd batteries. The payload consisted of Communications Satellite Corporation two transponders using 12 watt TWTA (United States) amplifiers for multiple access, 1500 voice circuits or 4 TV channels. Kosmos 319 (DS-P1-Yu #29) Eladio Miranda Batlle [email protected] Cronología de lanzamientos espaciales 6 Cosmos 319 was a Soviet DS type military along the flight path. The television system satellite launched from the Plesetsk was housed in the side of the domed nose cosmodrome. section, and its optical axis was directly DS (Dnepropetrovsk Sputnik) were small along nadir. The radiation balance sensor satellites built by Yangel's OKB-586 / KB units were attached to booms that Yuzhnoye in the Ukraine for launch by the telescoped out from the lower and upper same KB's Kosmos launch vehicles. They sides of the satellite base. The lower were used for a wide range of military and sensor unit faced nadir, and the upper scientific research and component proving sensor unit viewed in the zenith direction. tests. Also attached to the base, by means of four long bars, was the annular Launch Date: 1970-01-15 aerodynamic stabilizer, which was capable Launch Vehicle: Kosmos-2I of providing an orientation in space with an Launch Site: Plesetsk, U.S.S.R error less than 5 deg relative to the three Mass: 400.0 kg coordinate axes. The satellite's orientation was also regulated with rather high Kosmos 320 (DS-MO #2) accuracy from the measurements made by the scientific instruments.
Recommended publications
  • SATELLITES at WORK Space in the Seventies
    SaLf ILMITRATBONS REPROMhdONkp N BLACK ANd WHiT? SATELLITES AT WORK Space in the Seventies 4 (SPACE IN N72-13 8 6 6 (NASA-EP-8 ) SATELLITES AT WORK THE SEVENTIES) W.R. Corliss (NASA) Jun. 1971 29 p CSCL 22B Unclas Reproduced by G3/31 11470 NATIONAL TECHNICAL u. INFORMATION SERVICE U S Department of Commerce Springfield VA 22151 J National Aeronautics and Space Administration SPACE IN THE SEVENTIES Man has walked on the Moon, made scientific observations there, and brought back to Earth samples of the lunar surface. Unmanned scientific spacecraft have probed for facts about matter, radiation and magnetism in space, and have collected data relating to the Moon, Venus, Mars, the Sun and some of the stars, and reported their findings to ground stations on Earth. Spacecraft have been put into orbit around the Earth as weather observation stations, as communications relay stations for a world-wide telephone and television network, and as aids to navigation. In addition, the space program has accelerated the advance of technology for science and industry, contributing many new ideas, processes and materials. All this took place in the decade of the Sixties. What next? What may be expected of space exploration in the Seventies? NASA has prepared a series of publications and motion pictures to provide a look forward to SPACE IN THE SEVENTIES. The topics covered in this series include: Earth orbital science; planetary exploration; practical applications of satellites; technology utilization; man in space; and aeronautics. SPACE IN THE SEVENTIES presents the planned programs of NASA for the coming decade.
    [Show full text]
  • For Bibliography by Year, See the Website)
    THIS IS THE TEXT OF A BIBLIOGRAPHY IN THE WEB SITE “THE DISCOVERY OF GLOBAL WARMING” BY SPENCER WEART, HTTP://WWW.AIP.ORG/HISTORY/CLIMATE. FEBRUARY 2014. COPYRIGHT © 2003-2014 SPENCER WEART & AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS Bibliography by Author (for Bibliography by Year, see the Website) This bibliography may seem long (more than 2500 items), but it has a great many omissions. Please see the discussion of sources in the “Method” essay. Note in particular that the IPCC reports have by far the most complete bibliography for recent scientific work. Abbreviations used in the notes: AIP: Niels Bohr Library at the American Institute of Physics, College Park, MD LDEO: Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Palisades, NY SIO: Scripps Institution of Oceanography Archives, La Jolla, CA Abarbenel, Albert, and Thomas McCluskey (1950). “Is the World Getting Warmer?” Saturday Evening Post, 1 July, pp. 22-23, 57-63. Abbot, Charles G., and F.E. Fowle, Jr. (1908). “Income and Outgo of Heat from the Earth, and the Dependence of Its Temperature Thereon.” Annals of the Astrophysical Observatory (Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC) 2: 159-176. Abbot, Charles G., and F.E. Fowle, Jr. (1913). “Volcanoes and Climate.” Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 60(29): 1-24. Abbot, Charles G. (1967). “Precipitation in Five Continents.” Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 151(5). Abelmann, Andrea, et al. (2006). “Extensive Phytoplankton Blooms in the Atlantic Sector of the Glacial Southern Ocean.” Paleoceanography 21: PA1013 [doi:10.1029/2005PA001199, 2006]. Abelson, P.H. (1977). “Energy and Climate.” Science 197: 941. Abe-Ouchi, Ayako, et al. (2013). “Insolation-Driven 100,000-Year Glacial Cycles and Hysteresis of Ice-Sheet Volume.” Nature 500: 190-93 [doi:10.1038/nature12374].
    [Show full text]
  • NASA Process for Limiting Orbital Debris
    NASA-HANDBOOK NASA HANDBOOK 8719.14 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Approved: 2008-07-30 Washington, DC 20546 Expiration Date: 2013-07-30 HANDBOOK FOR LIMITING ORBITAL DEBRIS Measurement System Identification: Metric APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE – DISTRIBUTION IS UNLIMITED NASA-Handbook 8719.14 This page intentionally left blank. Page 2 of 174 NASA-Handbook 8719.14 DOCUMENT HISTORY LOG Status Document Approval Date Description Revision Baseline 2008-07-30 Initial Release Page 3 of 174 NASA-Handbook 8719.14 This page intentionally left blank. Page 4 of 174 NASA-Handbook 8719.14 This page intentionally left blank. Page 6 of 174 NASA-Handbook 8719.14 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 SCOPE...........................................................................................................................13 1.1 Purpose................................................................................................................................ 13 1.2 Applicability ....................................................................................................................... 13 2 APPLICABLE AND REFERENCE DOCUMENTS................................................14 3 ACRONYMS AND DEFINITIONS ...........................................................................15 3.1 Acronyms............................................................................................................................ 15 3.2 Definitions .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Space Debris
    IADC-11-04 April 2013 Space Debris IADC Assessment Report for 2010 Issued by the IADC Steering Group Table of Contents 1. Foreword .......................................................................... 1 2. IADC Highlights ................................................................ 2 3. Space Debris Activities in the United Nations ................... 4 4. Earth Satellite Population .................................................. 6 5. Satellite Launches, Reentries and Retirements ................ 10 6. Satellite Fragmentations ................................................... 15 7. Collision Avoidance .......................................................... 17 8. Orbital Debris Removal ..................................................... 18 9. Major Meetings Addressing Space Debris ........................ 20 Appendix: Satellite Break-ups, 2000-2010 ............................ 22 IADC Assessment Report for 2010 i Acronyms ADR Active Debris Removal ASI Italian Space Agency CNES Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales (France) CNSA China National Space Agency CSA Canadian Space Agency COPUOS Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space, United Nations DLR German Aerospace Center ESA European Space Agency GEO Geosynchronous Orbit region (region near 35,786 km altitude where the orbital period of a satellite matches that of the rotation rate of the Earth) IADC Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee ISRO Indian Space Research Organization ISS International Space Station JAXA Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency LEO Low
    [Show full text]
  • 03371101.Pdf
    C/64-10 RADIO AND TELEVISION IN THE SOVIET UNION F. Gayle Durham Research Program on Problems of International Communication and Security Center for International Studies Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, Massachusetts June, 1965 Table of Contents Prefatory Remarks I. The Broadcasting Network.............. A. Radiobroadcasting.. .................... B. Broadcasting Stations................... .6 C. Television Broadcasting.................. .8 D. Number of Television Stations............ .13 E. Radio and Television in Rural Localities. .15 II. Production and Repair of Radio and Television Sets.21 A. Radio Se s . .. .. .. .2 C. Future Radio and Television Sets...............34 D. Subscription Fees..........................,..41 E. Repair of Radio and Television Sets........,...42 III. The Administration of Soviet Radio and Television..47 A. Structural Apparatus of the Broadcasting BAFudton o eAinistration................. B. Functions of the Administration................50 IV. Programs and Hours of Broadcasting........ .54 . .54 B. Television................ .57 C. Educational Television in the USSR..... .59 D. Radio and Television in Dnepropetrovsk, Ukrainian SSR...................... * a ... 62 E. Recording of Broadcasts.................. .. .. .64 V. INTERVISION............................... ... .68 VI. The Soviet Audience....................... .74 A. Size of the . Audience..................... .74 B. Nature of the . .0 . Audience.................. .75 C. Audience Feedback and Listenincg Behavior. .0 . .77 Maps, Tables
    [Show full text]
  • The Soviet Space Program
    C05500088 TOP eEGRET iuf 3EEA~ NIE 11-1-71 THE SOVIET SPACE PROGRAM Declassified Under Authority of the lnteragency Security Classification Appeals Panel, E.O. 13526, sec. 5.3(b)(3) ISCAP Appeal No. 2011 -003, document 2 Declassification date: November 23, 2020 ifOP GEEAE:r C05500088 1'9P SloGRET CONTENTS Page THE PROBLEM ... 1 SUMMARY OF KEY JUDGMENTS l DISCUSSION 5 I. SOV.IET SPACE ACTIVITY DURING TfIE PAST TWO YEARS . 5 II. POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC FACTORS AFFECTING FUTURE PROSPECTS . 6 A. General ............................................. 6 B. Organization and Management . ............... 6 C. Economics .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ...... .. 8 III. SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL FACTORS ... 9 A. General .. .. .. .. .. 9 B. Launch Vehicles . 9 C. High-Energy Propellants .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 11 D. Manned Spacecraft . 12 E. Life Support Systems . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 15 F. Non-Nuclear Power Sources for Spacecraft . 16 G. Nuclear Power and Propulsion ..... 16 Te>P M:EW TCS 2032-71 IOP SECl<ET" C05500088 TOP SECRGJ:. IOP SECREI Page H. Communications Systems for Space Operations . 16 I. Command and Control for Space Operations . 17 IV. FUTURE PROSPECTS ....................................... 18 A. General ............... ... ···•· ................. ····· ... 18 B. Manned Space Station . 19 C. Planetary Exploration . ........ 19 D. Unmanned Lunar Exploration ..... 21 E. Manned Lunar Landfog ... 21 F. Applied Satellites ......... 22 G. Scientific Satellites ........................................ 24 V. INTERNATIONAL SPACE COOPERATION ............. 24 A. USSR-European Nations .................................... 24 B. USSR-United States 25 ANNEX A. SOVIET SPACE ACTIVITY ANNEX B. SOVIET SPACE LAUNCH VEHICLES ANNEX C. SOVIET CHRONOLOGICAL SPACE LOG FOR THE PERIOD 24 June 1969 Through 27 June 1971 TCS 2032-71 IOP SLClt~ 70P SECRE1- C05500088 TOP SEGR:R THE SOVIET SPACE PROGRAM THE PROBLEM To estimate Soviet capabilities and probable accomplishments in space over the next 5 to 10 years.' SUMMARY OF KEY JUDGMENTS A.
    [Show full text]
  • A Value Proposition for Lunar Architectures Utilizing On-Orbit Propellant Refueling
    A VALUE PROPOSITION FOR LUNAR ARCHITECTURES UTILIZING ON-ORBIT PROPELLANT REFUELING By James Jay Young In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology May 2009 Copyright © 2009 by James J. Young A VALUE PROPOSITION FOR LUNAR ARCHITECTURES UTILIZING ON-ORBIT PROPELLANT REFUELING Approved by: Dr. Alan W. Wilhite, Chairman Dr. Douglas Stanley School of Aerospace Engineering School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Trina M. Chytka Dr. Daniel P. Schrage Vehicle Analysis Branch School of Aerospace Engineering NASA Langley Research Center Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Carlee A. Bishop Electronics Systems Laboratory Georgia Tech Research Institute Date Approved: October 29, 2008 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS As I sit down to acknowledge all the people who have helped me throughout my career as a student I realized that I could spend pages thanking everyone. I may never have reached all of my goals without your endless support. I would like to thank all of you for helping me achieve me goals. I would like to specifically thank my thesis advisor, Dr. Alan Wilhite, for his guidance throughout this process. I would also like to thank my committee members, Dr. Carlee Bishop, Dr. Trina Chytka, Dr. Daniel Scharge, and Dr. Douglas Stanley for the time they dedicated to helping me complete my dissertation. I would also like to thank Dr. John Olds for his guidance during my first two years at Georgia Tech and introducing me to the conceptual design field. I must also thank all of the current and former students of the Space Systems Design Laboratory for helping me overcome any technical challenges that I encountered during my research.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian and Chinese Responses to U.S. Military Plans in Space
    Russian and Chinese Responses to U.S. Military Plans in Space Pavel Podvig and Hui Zhang © 2008 by the American Academy of Arts and Sciences All rights reserved. ISBN: 0-87724-068-X The views expressed in this volume are those held by each contributor and are not necessarily those of the Officers and Fellows of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Please direct inquiries to: American Academy of Arts and Sciences 136 Irving Street Cambridge, MA 02138-1996 Telephone: (617) 576-5000 Fax: (617) 576-5050 Email: [email protected] Visit our website at www.amacad.org Contents v PREFACE vii ACRONYMS 1 CHAPTER 1 Russia and Military Uses of Space Pavel Podvig 31 CHAPTER 2 Chinese Perspectives on Space Weapons Hui Zhang 79 CONTRIBUTORS Preface In recent years, Russia and China have urged the negotiation of an interna - tional treaty to prevent an arms race in outer space. The United States has responded by insisting that existing treaties and rules governing the use of space are sufficient. The standoff has produced a six-year deadlock in Geneva at the United Nations Conference on Disarmament, but the parties have not been inactive. Russia and China have much to lose if the United States were to pursue the programs laid out in its planning documents. This makes prob - able the eventual formulation of responses that are adverse to a broad range of U.S. interests in space. The Chinese anti-satellite test in January 2007 was prelude to an unfolding drama in which the main act is still subject to revi - sion.
    [Show full text]
  • Failures in Spacecraft Systems: an Analysis from The
    FAILURES IN SPACECRAFT SYSTEMS: AN ANALYSIS FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF DECISION MAKING A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Purdue University by Vikranth R. Kattakuri In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering August 2019 Purdue University West Lafayette, Indiana ii THE PURDUE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL STATEMENT OF THESIS APPROVAL Dr. Jitesh H. Panchal, Chair School of Mechanical Engineering Dr. Ilias Bilionis School of Mechanical Engineering Dr. William Crossley School of Aeronautics and Astronautics Approved by: Dr. Jay P. Gore Associate Head of Graduate Studies iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am extremely grateful to my advisor Prof. Jitesh Panchal for his patient guidance throughout the two years of my studies. I am indebted to him for considering me to be a part of his research group and for providing this opportunity to work in the fields of systems engineering and mechanical design for a period of 2 years. Being a research and teaching assistant under him had been a rewarding experience. Without his valuable insights, this work would not only have been possible, but also inconceivable. I would like to thank my co-advisor Prof. Ilias Bilionis for his valuable inputs, timely guidance and extremely engaging research meetings. I thank my committee member, Prof. William Crossley for his interest in my work. I had a great opportunity to attend all three courses taught by my committee members and they are the best among all the courses I had at Purdue. I would like to thank my mentors Dr. Jagannath Raju of Systemantics India Pri- vate Limited and Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Na Sa /T M- 113448
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19980003950 2017-12-03T02:45:01+00:00Z -_/-/-..., NA S A_/T M- 113448 Reconsidering Sputnik: Forty Years Since the Soviet Satellite S. Dillon Ripley Center Auditorium Smithsonian Institution 1100 Jefferson Drive S.W. Washington, D.C. September 30 - October 1, 1997 NASA History Office, NASA Headquarters Office of Policy and Plans National Air and Space Museum, Smithsonian Institution Space Policy Institute, The George Washington University Kennan Institute for Advanced Russian Studies, Woodrow Wilson Center for International Scholars On October 4, 1957 the Soviet Union lofted the first artificial satellite, Sputnik 1, into Earth orbit. This 184-pound, basketball-sized sphere ushered in the era of the space race. At the height of the Cold War and several months into the International Geophysical Year, the Soviet Union had beaten the United States into space, a symbolically significant achievement. In the immediate aftermath, the American public was greatly distressed and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration was created within a year. The real significance of the Sputnik I launch can be seen over the long term, however, as the race for human exploration of the Moon began in the early 1960s, global satellite communications became a reality, and new generations of scientific spacecraft began exploring the universe. The NASA Office of Policy and Plans/History Office, the National Air and Space Museum, the George Washington University Space Policy Institute, and the Kennan Institute for Advanced Russian Studies are proud to sponsor a symposium on the impact of Sputnik. Separate panels will address Soviet and American activities prior to Sputnik, immediate ramifications of the launch in the United States and around the world, and some of the long-term consequences.
    [Show full text]
  • Trends in Space Commerce
    Foreword from the Secretary of Commerce As the United States seeks opportunities to expand our economy, commercial use of space resources continues to increase in importance. The use of space as a platform for increasing the benefits of our technological evolution continues to increase in a way that profoundly affects us all. Whether we use these resources to synchronize communications networks, to improve agriculture through precision farming assisted by imagery and positioning data from satellites, or to receive entertainment from direct-to-home satellite transmissions, commercial space is an increasingly large and important part of our economy and our information infrastructure. Once dominated by government investment, commercial interests play an increasing role in the space industry. As the voice of industry within the U.S. Government, the Department of Commerce plays a critical role in commercial space. Through the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the Department of Commerce licenses the operation of commercial remote sensing satellites. Through the International Trade Administration, the Department of Commerce seeks to improve U.S. industrial exports in the global space market. Through the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, the Department of Commerce assists in the coordination of the radio spectrum used by satellites. And, through the Technology Administration's Office of Space Commercialization, the Department of Commerce plays a central role in the management of the Global Positioning System and advocates the views of industry within U.S. Government policy making processes. I am pleased to commend for your review the Office of Space Commercialization's most recent publication, Trends in Space Commerce. The report presents a snapshot of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Best of Nimbus
    9G45-80 3i -T1-;s |jj , b- G THE BEST OF NIMBUS MARCH 1971 CONTRACT NO. NAS 5-10343 0vI^EX:1.e -ThUt·a.S ; /f l 0 rGim,,,'ll? FTINSim aX,< ,,,,,. ., \N /, prepared for NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER GREENBELT, MARYLAND COLOR ILLUSTRATIONS REPRODUCED IN BLACK AND WHITE ALLIED RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC. _______VIRGINIA ROAD CONCORD, MA S S'ACH U SE TT S _ Nimbus 9G45-80 THE BEST OF NIMBUS MARCH 1971 CONTRACT NO. NAS 5-10343 prepared for NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER GREENBELT, MARYLAND Details of ilhsba!h ., this dowme may be btd A.ttdW an ntmfthe ____ALLIED RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC. VI R GINIA ROAD CON C ORD, MASSACHU S ETTS Preceding page blank- FOREWORD The past decade has seen the opening of a new era in meteorology. The use of satellites as remote sensing platforms to observe the earth' s weather has significantly increased our understanding of our atmospheric environment and its mechanisms. The TIROS satellites which were first launched in April of 1960 were primarily intended to serve the operational needs of the meteorologists in the detection and tracking of storms, frontal systems and similar phenomena by means of their associated cloud patterns. Nimbus, NASA' s "second-generation" meteorological satellite, has further advanced the application of such observations to meteorological research and to other fields of geophysics. In the past six years, four Nimbus satellites have been successfully launched, carrying increasingly complex scientific instruments. From their sun-synchronous near-polar orbits these earth-oriented satellites have returned to earth a wealth of new data appli- cable to meteorology, as well as significant data of interest for oceanography, geology, geography and hydrology.
    [Show full text]