DOCSLIB.ORG

Na Sa /T M- 113448

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Na Sa /T M- 113448 https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19980003950 2017-12-03T02:45:01+00:00Z -_/-/-..., NA S A_/T M- 113448 Reconsidering Sputnik: Forty Years Since the Soviet Satellite S. Dillon Ripley Center Auditorium Smithsonian Institution 1100 Jefferson Drive S.W. Washington, D.C. September 30 - October 1, 1997 NASA History Office, NASA Headquarters Office of Policy and Plans National Air and Space Museum, Smithsonian Institution Space Policy Institute, The George Washington University Kennan Institute for Advanced Russian Studies, Woodrow Wilson Center for International Scholars On October 4, 1957 the Soviet Union lofted the first artificial satellite, Sputnik 1, into Earth orbit. This 184-pound, basketball-sized sphere ushered in the era of the space race. At the height of the Cold War and several months into the International Geophysical Year, the Soviet Union had beaten the United States into space, a symbolically significant achievement. In the immediate aftermath, the American public was greatly distressed and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration was created within a year. The real significance of the Sputnik I launch can be seen over the long term, however, as the race for human exploration of the Moon began in the early 1960s, global satellite communications became a reality, and new generations of scientific spacecraft began exploring the universe. The NASA Office of Policy and Plans/History Office, the National Air and Space Museum, the George Washington University Space Policy Institute, and the Kennan Institute for Advanced Russian Studies are proud to sponsor a symposium on the impact of Sputnik. Separate panels will address Soviet and American activities prior to Sputnik, immediate ramifications of the launch in the United States and around the world, and some of the long-term consequences. The symposium will take place in the auditorium of the S. Dillon Ripley Center of the Smithsonian Institution at 1000 Jefferson Drive SW, Washington, DC. Attendance at the symposium is open to the public, but seating is limited so early registration is strongly encouraged. There is a $30 registration fee for breakfast, lunch, and refreshments. AGENDA Tuesday, September 30 9:00 a.m. Welcome, Announcements, and Introduction by Alan M. Ladwig, NASA Associate Administrator for Policy and Plans; Roger D. Launius, NASA Chief Historian; and John M. Logsdon, Director of the Space Policy Institute at George Washington University 9:15 a.m. Keynote Speech: "Was Sputnik Really a Saltation?" by Walter A. McDougall, Professor of I-Iistory and International Relations, University of Pennsylvania 9:45 a.m. The Soviet Union and Sputnik Chair: Marcia S. Smith, Science Policy Research Division, Congressional Research Service "Rising from the Cradle: Soviet Public Perceptions of Spaceflight Before Sputnik," by Peter A. Gorin "Korolev, Sputnik, and the International Geophysical Year," by AsifA. Siddiqi, Department of History, Carnegie Mellon University "Korolev's Triple Play: Sputniks 1, 2, and 3" by James J. Harford, Executive Director Emeritus, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics "State Program, Bureaucratic Entrepreneurship, or Scientific Autonomy? Policymaking Processes and Structures Behind the Launch of Sputnik" by Andrew J. Aldrin, TRW Components International and Department of Politicai Science, California State University at Long Beach 11:00 a.m. Break 11:15 a.m. Space and the International Geophysical Year Chair: Derek Elliott, Department of History, Geography, and Political Science, Tennessee State University "Before Sputnik: National Security and the Formation of U.S. Outer Space Policy, 1953-1957," by Kenneth A. Osgood, Department of History, University of California at Santa Barbara "A Strategy for Space," by Dwayne A. Day, Guggenheim Fellow, National Air and Space Museum "Sputnik and the IGY," by Rip Bulkeley, Oxford, England 12:30 p.m. Lunch (catered box) 1:30p.m.Immediate Ramifications of Sputnik in the United States Chair: John M. Logsdon, Director of the Space Policy Institute at George Washington University "Sputnik, the Gaither Committee, and the Escalation of the Cold War," by David L. Snead, Richmond, VA "Organizing the U.S. Government for Outer Space: 1957-1958," by Eilene Galloway, Honorary Director, International Institute of Space Law and Trustee Emeritus, International Academy of Astronautics "Sputnik: APolitical Symbol and Tool in 1960 Campaign Politics," by Gretchen J. Van Dyke, Department of Political Science, University of Scranton "Opening the Space Age: A Legacy of the International Geophysical Year," by J.A. Simpson, Enrico Fermi Institute and Department of Physics, University of Chicago 3:00 p.m. Break 3:15 p.m. Immediate Ramifications of Sputnik - International Perspectives Chair: Steven J. Dick, U.S. Naval Observatory "Building a Third Space Power: Western European Reactions to Sputnik at the Dawn of the Space Age," by John Ka-ige, Director, Centre de Recherche en I-Iistoire des Sciences et des Techniques, Pads "Sputnik and France: A 'Mission to Civilize?'," by Guillaume de Syon, History Department, Albright College "The Impact of Sputnik on American Foreign Policy," by Lawrence S. Kaplan, Director Emeritus, Lemnitzer Center for NATO and European Community Studies, Kent State University 4:30 p.m. General Discussion 5:00 p.m. Adjourn Wednesday, October I 7:45 am Breakfast at National Air and Space Museum 9:00 a.m. Welcome and Announcements by Roger D. Launius, NASA ChiefI-Iistorian, and Blair D. Ruble, Director, Kennan Institute for Advanced Russian Studies, Woodrow Wilson Center for International Scholars 9:15 a.m. Keynote Address: "The Long Term Consequences of the Soviet Union's Investment in Space Exploration," by Sergei Khrushchev, Watson Institute, Brown University 9:45 a.m. Long-term Consequences of Sputnik: Chair: Robert W. Smith, Chair, Space History Department, National Air and Space Museum "Reflections on Sputnik," by Roald Sagdeev, East-West Space Science Center, University of Maryland "Artifacts or Facts?: Soviet Space Historiography in the Last Forty Years," by Cathleen S. Lewis, Department of Space History, National Air and Space Museum Break "Sputnik and the Creation of the Soviet Space Industry," by William P. Barry, Department of Political Science, U.S. Air Force Academy "A Certain Future: American Higher Education and the Survival of a Nation," by John A. Douglass, University California at Santa Barbara and Berkeley Center for Studies in Higher Education "Sputnik and Technological Surprise," by Glenn P. Hastedt, Department of Political Science, James Madison University 12:00 p.m. Adjourn PETER A. GORIN 120-F Waller Mill Road #202, Williamsburg, Virginia 23185 Phone/Fax: 1-757-253-1074 E-mail: [email protected] History Symposium Reconsidering Sputnik: Forty Years Since the Soviet Satellite Paper Proposal March 25, 1997 The Earth is a cradle of human intellect. but one cannot live in a cradle forever... Konstantin E. Tsiolkovsky RISING FROM A CRADLE... Soviet Public Perception of Spaceflight Before Sputnik The paper is intended to describe Russian/Soviet public perception of spaceflight in the first half of the 20th century, prior to the launch of the first satellite (1900 - 1957). The purpose of this research is to show that despite the secrecy around Soviet rocket program the public in the USSR was prepared to understand and accept the beginning of the space era. The paper will address the following subjects: • Early proponents of a spaceflight ideas in Russia and the USSR; • Descriptions of future space explorations in Russian/Soviet popular science and science fiction literature; • Knowledge and response of the general public to a possibility of a spaceflight; • Public spaceflight societies in the USSR; • Political exploitation of the spaceflight idea in the 1920s - 1950s. The author will deliberately avoid detailed description of professional rocket research organizations: GDL, MosGIRD and RNII. Although those organizations in many respects created a scientific foundation for the rocket technology in the USSR, their work is more or less known today in the West. They also worked in secrecy, thus having only a marginal impact on a public opinion. Instead, the author will concentrate on activities of the early spaceflight proponents who appealed directly to the public. Apart from the works of the spaceflight pioneer Konstantin Tsiolkovsky, the paper will provide short accounts on activities of iesser-k_aown Soviet scientists mad writers, such as: Yuri Kondratiuk, Friedreich Tsander, Yakov Perelman, Ari Schternfeld, Nikolay Rynin, Alexander Beliyaev and others. It will show how popular science and science fiction literature deeply influenced public awareness of a possibility of a spaceflight. The author will describe and demonstrate samples of such literature of the 1930s - 1950s. The paper also intend to analyze the origin and trends of how Soviet political leadership exploited spaceflight idea for political propaganda purposes. It will be shown in the paper, that such political exploitation did not start with a launch of Sputnik but goes back to the 1920s. In author's opinion, the research subject of this proposed paper is new for the US public and historians alike. The paper will be based mostly on Russian original materials. The author intends to illustrate his presentation by view-graphs with rare images of how Soviet scientists envisaged space activities before the launch of Sputnik. REPRODUCED AT GOVT. EXPENSE AsifA. Siddiqi © 1997 1 Korolev, Sputnik, and The International
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 03371101.Pdf
    C/64-10 RADIO AND TELEVISION IN THE SOVIET UNION F. Gayle Durham Research Program on Problems of International Communication and Security Center for International Studies Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, Massachusetts June, 1965 Table of Contents Prefatory Remarks I. The Broadcasting Network.............. A. Radiobroadcasting.. .................... B. Broadcasting Stations................... .6 C. Television Broadcasting.................. .8 D. Number of Television Stations............ .13 E. Radio and Television in Rural Localities. .15 II. Production and Repair of Radio and Television Sets.21 A. Radio Se s . .. .. .. .2 C. Future Radio and Television Sets...............34 D. Subscription Fees..........................,..41 E. Repair of Radio and Television Sets........,...42 III. The Administration of Soviet Radio and Television..47 A. Structural Apparatus of the Broadcasting BAFudton o eAinistration................. B. Functions of the Administration................50 IV. Programs and Hours of Broadcasting........ .54 . .54 B. Television................ .57 C. Educational Television in the USSR..... .59 D. Radio and Television in Dnepropetrovsk, Ukrainian SSR...................... * a ... 62 E. Recording of Broadcasts.................. .. .. .64 V. INTERVISION............................... ... .68 VI. The Soviet Audience....................... .74 A. Size of the . Audience..................... .74 B. Nature of the . .0 . Audience.................. .75 C. Audience Feedback and Listenincg Behavior. .0 . .77 Maps, Tables
    [Show full text]
  • The Soviet Space Program
    C05500088 TOP eEGRET iuf 3EEA~ NIE 11-1-71 THE SOVIET SPACE PROGRAM Declassified Under Authority of the lnteragency Security Classification Appeals Panel, E.O. 13526, sec. 5.3(b)(3) ISCAP Appeal No. 2011 -003, document 2 Declassification date: November 23, 2020 ifOP GEEAE:r C05500088 1'9P SloGRET CONTENTS Page THE PROBLEM ... 1 SUMMARY OF KEY JUDGMENTS l DISCUSSION 5 I. SOV.IET SPACE ACTIVITY DURING TfIE PAST TWO YEARS . 5 II. POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC FACTORS AFFECTING FUTURE PROSPECTS . 6 A. General ............................................. 6 B. Organization and Management . ............... 6 C. Economics .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ...... .. 8 III. SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL FACTORS ... 9 A. General .. .. .. .. .. 9 B. Launch Vehicles . 9 C. High-Energy Propellants .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 11 D. Manned Spacecraft . 12 E. Life Support Systems . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 15 F. Non-Nuclear Power Sources for Spacecraft . 16 G. Nuclear Power and Propulsion ..... 16 Te>P M:EW TCS 2032-71 IOP SECl<ET" C05500088 TOP SECRGJ:. IOP SECREI Page H. Communications Systems for Space Operations . 16 I. Command and Control for Space Operations . 17 IV. FUTURE PROSPECTS ....................................... 18 A. General ............... ... ···•· ................. ····· ... 18 B. Manned Space Station . 19 C. Planetary Exploration . ........ 19 D. Unmanned Lunar Exploration ..... 21 E. Manned Lunar Landfog ... 21 F. Applied Satellites ......... 22 G. Scientific Satellites ........................................ 24 V. INTERNATIONAL SPACE COOPERATION ............. 24 A. USSR-European Nations .................................... 24 B. USSR-United States 25 ANNEX A. SOVIET SPACE ACTIVITY ANNEX B. SOVIET SPACE LAUNCH VEHICLES ANNEX C. SOVIET CHRONOLOGICAL SPACE LOG FOR THE PERIOD 24 June 1969 Through 27 June 1971 TCS 2032-71 IOP SLClt~ 70P SECRE1- C05500088 TOP SEGR:R THE SOVIET SPACE PROGRAM THE PROBLEM To estimate Soviet capabilities and probable accomplishments in space over the next 5 to 10 years.' SUMMARY OF KEY JUDGMENTS A.
    [Show full text]
  • Geopolitical Cultures of Outer Space: the British Interplanetary Society, 1933-1965
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Queen's University Research Portal Geopolitical Cultures of Outer Space: The British Interplanetary Society, 1933-1965 Dunnett, O. (2017). Geopolitical Cultures of Outer Space: The British Interplanetary Society, 1933-1965. DOI: 10.1080/14650045.2016.1247267 Published in: Geopolitics Document Version: Peer reviewed version Queen's University Belfast - Research Portal: Link to publication record in Queen's University Belfast Research Portal Publisher rights Copyright 2016 Taylor & Francis. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Queen's University Belfast Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The Research Portal is Queen's institutional repository that provides access to Queen's research output. Every effort has been made to ensure that content in the Research Portal does not infringe any person's rights, or applicable UK laws. If you discover content in the Research Portal that you believe breaches copyright or violates any law, please contact [email protected]. Download date:09. Sep. 2018 Geopolitical Cultures of Outer Space: The British Interplanetary Society, 1933-1965 Oliver Dunnett, Queen’s University Belfast Post-print version of article submitted to Geopolitics Introduction British involvement in spaceflight has, in recent years, been the subject of increased interest in popular and scientific circles, driven by events such as the British astronaut Major Tim Peake’s stay on the International Space Station in 2015-16, British scientists’ involvement in the European Space Agency’s ‘Philae’ comet lander project in 2014, and the establishment of a UK Space Agency in 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Brian Harvey
    Leibniz Online, Nr. 43 (2021) Zeitschrift der Leibniz-Sozietät der Wissenschaften zu Berlin e. V. ISSN 1863-3285 Brian Harvey 40. Jahrestag der Gründung des Instituts für Kosmosforschung – eine persönliche Reflexion* Deutsch von Jacqueline Myrrhe Veröffentlicht: 25. Juni 2021 Als ein Raumfahrtfan von jungen Jahren, führte ich ein handschriftliches Tagebuch über die wichtigsten Ereignisse in der Raumfahrt – eine Aufzeichnung, die mir bis heute als wertvoller Beleg der Zeitgeschichte dient. Allerdings, es gibt keinen Eintrag für den 1. April 1981, dem Gründungsdatum der Raumfahrtorganisation der Deutschen Demokratischen Republik (DDR), d. h. des Instituts für Kosmosforschung (IKF). Der Flug von Sigmund Jähn zu Saljut 6 zwei Jahre zuvor und auch die Teilnahme der DDR am Interkosmos-Programm war den meisten westlichen Beobachtern und Raumfahrtfans bekannt. Aber das war es auch schon. Denn da ist kein Tagebucheintrag für den 1. April 1981. Jahre später, bei der Recherche für das neue Buch „European-Russian cooperation in space – from de Gaulle to ExoMars“ in dem es um das Thema Raumfahrtkooperation zwischen Europa und Russland geht, bin ich hier und da durch einige flüchtige Verweise auf „das IKF” gestoßen. Ich war von der Existenz einer Raumfahrtorganisation in der DDR überrascht und noch mehr darüber, dass das IKF ein bedeutendes, eigenständiges Programm durchgeführt hatte; dass es der Bundesrepublik der 1990er ein erhebliches Erbe hinterlassen hat; dass es ein wesentlicher Baustein für die folgende europäisch- russische Zusammenarbeit war; und dass es auf mysteriöse Weise aus den historischen Aufzeichnungen verschwunden war. Für einen Historiker ist es immer wichtig, darauf zu achten, auf welche Art und Weise Geschichte im Nachhinein rekonstruiert wird.
    [Show full text]
  • Engineering UK 2020 Report
    Engineering UK 2020 Educational pathways into engineering Engineering UK 2020 Foreword Educational pathways into engineering Authors EngineeringUK would like to express sincere A central part of EngineeringUK’s work is to provide educators, policy-makers, industrialists and others with the most gratitude and special thanks to the following up-to-date analyses and insight. Since 2005, our EngineeringUK State of Engineering report has portrayed the breadth of Luke Armitage the sector, how it is changing and who is working within it, as well as quantifying students on educational pathways into Senior Research Analyst, EngineeringUK individuals, who contributed thought pieces or engineering and considering whether they will meet future workforce needs. Despite numerous changes of government Mollie Bourne acted as critical readers for this report: and educational policy, the 2008 recession and the advent of Brexit, the need for the UK to respond to the COVID-19 Research and Impact Manager, EngineeringUK Amanda Dickins pandemic has provided the most uncertain and challenging context to date for our research. Jess Di Simone Head of Impact and Development, STEM Learning Research Officer, EngineeringUK Teresa Frith Anna Jones Senior Skills Policy Manager, Association of Colleges Research Officer, EngineeringUK Ruth Gilligan Stephanie Neave Assistant Director for Equality Charters, AdvanceHE Our analyses for this report started before the pandemic • Ambitious plans to expand technical education are heavily Head of Research, EngineeringUK began. In light of the current and rapidly changing educational reliant on employers and may not have considered the Aimee Higgins environment, EngineeringUK has not sought to update our specific requirements of engineering. It will be even harder to Director of Employers and Partnerships, The Careers & findings.
    [Show full text]
  • Space and Satellites
    House of Commons Science and Technology Select Committee inquiry on Space and Satellites Response to the inquiry, 29 January 2016 This evidence is submitted by the Royal Academy of Engineering. As the UK’s national academy for engineering, we bring together the most successful and talented engineers from across the engineering sectors for a shared purpose: to advance and promote excellence in engineering. The views described in this response were assembled through consultation with our Fellows. These include experts in space engineering from industry and academia. Introduction 1. Since the publication of the UK Space Innovation and Growth Strategy 2014-2030, the government has picked up many of the recommendations, which has galvanised the industry. The success of the strategy is illustrated by the high annual growth figure of 7.3%1 reported in 2014. Furthermore, this is a high-productivity industry whose expansion aligns well with the objectives of the government’s Productivity Plan and which is well placed to capitalise on the UK’s strengths in IT, the digital economy and finance for investment. 2. Overseas companies perceive the UK as a good place to locate their business and inward investment is happening. This positive perception is a direct result of the UK’s clear long- term strategy, the creation of the UK Space Agency, European Space Agency (ESA) investment to establish a presence in the UK, the broader business environment, a strong technology base and the availability of entrepreneurial and highly-skilled people to employ. 3. The Academy welcomes government’s continuing support represented by the recent National Space Policy and recognition of the cross-cutting nature of space across a huge range of government departments and agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Duncan Sandys, Unmanned Weaponry, and the Impossibility of Defence
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of East Anglia digital repository 1 Nuclear Belief Systems and Individual Policy-Makers: Duncan Sandys, Unmanned Weaponry, and the Impossibility of Defence Lewis David Betts This thesis is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of East Anglia (School of History, Faculty of Arts and Humanities) November, 2014 This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with the author and that use of any information derived there from must be in accordance with current UK Copyright Law. In addition, any quotation or extract must include full attribution. 2 This thesis attempts to explore the influence that Duncan Sandys' experiences of the Second World War had on his policy preferences, and policy-making, in relation to British defence policy during his years in government. This is a significant period in British nuclear policy which began with thermonuclear weaponry being placed ostentatiously at the centre of British defence planning in the 1957 Defence White Paper, and ended with the British acquiring the latest American nuclear weapon technology as a consequence of the Polaris Sales Agreement. It also saw intense discussion of the nature and type of nuclear weaponry the British government sought to wield in the Cold War, with attempts to build indigenous land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles, and where British nuclear policy was discussed in extreme depth in government. The thesis explores this area by focusing on Duncan Sandys and examining his interaction with prominent aspects of the defence policy-making process.
    [Show full text]
  • Geopolitical Cultures of Outer Space: the British Interplanetary Society, 1933-1965
    Geopolitical Cultures of Outer Space: The British Interplanetary Society, 1933-1965 Dunnett, O. (2017). Geopolitical Cultures of Outer Space: The British Interplanetary Society, 1933-1965. Geopolitics, 22(2), 452 - 473. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2016.1247267 Published in: Geopolitics Document Version: Peer reviewed version Queen's University Belfast - Research Portal: Link to publication record in Queen's University Belfast Research Portal Publisher rights Copyright 2016 Taylor & Francis. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Queen's University Belfast Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The Research Portal is Queen's institutional repository that provides access to Queen's research output. Every effort has been made to ensure that content in the Research Portal does not infringe any person's rights, or applicable UK laws. If you discover content in the Research Portal that you believe breaches copyright or violates any law, please contact [email protected]. Download date:25. Sep. 2021 Geopolitical Cultures of Outer Space: The British Interplanetary Society, 1933-1965 Oliver Dunnett, Queen’s University Belfast Post-print version of article submitted to Geopolitics Introduction British involvement in spaceflight has, in recent years, been the subject of increased interest in popular and scientific circles, driven by events such as the British astronaut Major Tim Peake’s stay on the International Space Station in 2015-16, British scientists’ involvement in the European Space Agency’s ‘Philae’ comet lander project in 2014, and the establishment of a UK Space Agency in 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Principles of Systems Engineering Management: Reflections from 45 Years of Spacecraft Technology Research and Development at the Mullard Space Science Laboratory
    Principles of Systems Engineering Management: Reflections from 45 years of spacecraft technology research and development at the Mullard Space Science Laboratory M. R. Emes*, A. Smith, A. M. James, M. W. Whyndham, R. Leal and S. C. Jackson *Author to whom correspondence should be addressed UCL Centre for Systems Engineering, Mullard Space Science Laboratory, Holmbury St. Mary, Dorking, RH5 6NT, UK, Tel: 01483 204100, [email protected] Copyright © 2012 by M R Emes et al. Published and used by INCOSE with permission Abstract. Based on 45 years of experience conducting research and development into spacecraft instrumentation and 13 years’ experience teaching Systems Engineering in a range of industries, the Mullard Space Science Laboratory at University College London (UCL) has identified a set of guiding principles that have been invaluable in delivering successful projects in the most demanding of environments. The five principles are: ‘principles govern process’, ‘seek alternative systems perspectives’, ‘understand the enterprise context’, ‘integrate systems engineering and project management’, and ‘invest in the early stages of projects’. A common thread behind the principles is a desire to foster the ability to anticipate and respond to a changing environment with a constant focus on achieving long-term value for the enterprise. These principles are applied in space projects and have been spun-out to non-space projects (primarily through UCL’s Centre for Systems Engineering). They are also embedded in UCL’s extensive teaching and professional training programme. Context UCL's Department of Space and Climate Physics (Mullard Space Science Laboratory – MSSL) is a world-leading research organization and is the UK's largest university-based space research group.
    [Show full text]
  • Cronología De Lanzamientos Espaciales 1
    Cronología de lanzamientos espaciales 1 Cronología de Lanzamientos Espaciales Año 1966 Copyright © 2009 by Eladio Miranda Batlle. All rights reserved. Los textos, imágenes y tablas que se encuentran en esta cronología cuentan con la autorización de sus propietarios para ser publicadas o se hace referencia a la fuente de donde se obtuvieron los mismos. Eladio Miranda Batlle [email protected] Cronología del lanzamiento de misiones espaciales Contenido 1966 Enero 06.01.66 DMSP-3B F5 (OPS 2394) / 31.03.66 DMSP-3B F6 (OPS 0340) 1966- 001X 31.03.66 Luna 10 (E-6S #2) 07.01.66 DMSP 0714 07.01.66 Kosmos 104 (Zenit-2 #28) 19.01.66 KH-7 24 (OPS 7253) Abril OPS 3179 22.01.66 Kosmos 105 (Zenit-2 #29) 06.04.66 Kosmos 114 (Zenit-4 #17) 25.01.66 Kosmos 106 (DS-P1-I #1) 07.04.66 KH-4A 31 (OPS 1612) 08.04.66 Surveyor-SD 3 / Atlas Centaur 8 28.01.66 Transit-O 7 Transit 11 / 08.04.66 OAO 1 31.01.66 Luna 9 (E-6 #12) 19.04.66 KH-7 27 (OPS 0910) 20.04.66 Kosmos 115 (Zenit-2 #32) Febrero 22.04.66 OV3 1 25.04.66 Molniya-1 3 02.02.66 KH-4A 29 (OPS 7291) 26.04.66 Kosmos 116 (DS-P1-Yu #5) 03.02.66 ESSA 1 30.04.66 Luna 1966A 09.02.66 Samos-F3 5 (OPS 1439) /Ferret 8 10.02.66 Kosmos 107 (Zenit-2 #30) Mayo 11.02.66 Kosmos 108 (DS-U1-G #1) 15.02.66 KH-7 25 (OPS 1184) Bluebell 2C (OPS 3011) 04.05.66 1966-002X Bluebell 2S (OPS 3031) 04.05.66 KH-4A 32 (OPS 1508) 17.02.66 Diapason (D 1A) 06.05.66 Kosmos 117 (Zenit-2 #33) 19.02.66 Kosmos 109 (Zenit-4 #15) 11.05.66 Kosmos 118 (Meteor-1 #2) 21.02.66 Kosmos (110) (DS-K-40 #2) 14.05.66 KH-7 28 (OPS 1950) 22.02.66 Kosmos
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Visitors and the Post-Stalin Soviet State
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2016 Porous Empire: Foreign Visitors And The Post-Stalin Soviet State Alex Hazanov Hazanov University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Hazanov, Alex Hazanov, "Porous Empire: Foreign Visitors And The Post-Stalin Soviet State" (2016). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2330. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2330 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2330 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Porous Empire: Foreign Visitors And The Post-Stalin Soviet State Abstract “Porous Empire” is a study of the relationship between Soviet institutions, Soviet society and the millions of foreigners who visited the USSR between the mid-1950s and the mid-1980s. “Porous Empire” traces how Soviet economic, propaganda, and state security institutions, all shaped during the isolationist Stalin period, struggled to accommodate their practices to millions of visitors with material expectations and assumed legal rights radically unlike those of Soviet citizens. While much recent Soviet historiography focuses on the ways in which the post-Stalin opening to the outside world led to the erosion of official Soviet ideology, I argue that ideological attitudes inherited from the Stalin era structured institutional responses to a growing foreign presence in Soviet life. Therefore, while Soviet institutions had to accommodate their economic practices to the growing numbers of tourists and other visitors inside the Soviet borders and were forced to concede the existence of contact zones between foreigners and Soviet citizens that loosened some of the absolute sovereignty claims of the Soviet party-statem, they remained loyal to visions of Soviet economic independence, committed to fighting the cultural Cold War, and profoundly suspicious of the outside world.
    [Show full text]
  • OAO JSFC OAO Shareholders “22” May 2009 Minutes “__” _____ 2009 of Meeting No
    Preliminarily approved by Approved by the Annual the Board of Directors of General Meeting of Sistema Sistema JSFC OAO JSFC OAO Shareholders “22” May 2009 Minutes “__” _____ 2009 of Meeting No. 04-09 Minutes of Meeting No. __ SISTEMA Joint-Stock Financial Corporation Public Joint-Stock Company [OAO] ANNUAL REPORT for 2008 Completed in accordance with requirements of the “Regulation for disclosure of information by issuers of issuable securities” (Order of the Federal Service for Financial Markets of 10 October 2006 N 06-117/pz-n). The financial information presented in this Annual Report is based on data of the accounting statements compiled in accordance with Russian legislation and also contains elements from the consolidated financial statements compiled in accordance with international standards. All data presented in this Report are fixed as of 31 December 2008. Moscow, 2009 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Company’s positioning in the sector 4 1.1 Profile of Sistema JSFC OAO operations 4 1.2 Sistema JSFC OAO assets 4 2. Priority directions of the activity 7 2.1 Sistema JSFC OAO strategy 7 2.2 Determining the strategy and principles for asset portfolio management 7 3. Report of the Company’s Board of Directors on results of the 8 Company’s development 8 3.1 Key events of 2008 11 3.2 Financial results of activities according to the RBAS 13 3.3 Financial results of activities under the US GAAP 16 3.4 Sistema JSFC OAO credit ratings 16 3.5 Dividend policy, report on payment of declared (paid) dividends on Sistema JSFC OAO shares 4.
    [Show full text]