DOCSLIB.ORG

NASA Process for Limiting Orbital Debris

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NASA Process for Limiting Orbital Debris NASA-HANDBOOK NASA HANDBOOK 8719.14 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Approved: 2008-07-30 Washington, DC 20546 Expiration Date: 2013-07-30 HANDBOOK FOR LIMITING ORBITAL DEBRIS Measurement System Identification: Metric APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE – DISTRIBUTION IS UNLIMITED NASA-Handbook 8719.14 This page intentionally left blank. Page 2 of 174 NASA-Handbook 8719.14 DOCUMENT HISTORY LOG Status Document Approval Date Description Revision Baseline 2008-07-30 Initial Release Page 3 of 174 NASA-Handbook 8719.14 This page intentionally left blank. Page 4 of 174 NASA-Handbook 8719.14 This page intentionally left blank. Page 6 of 174 NASA-Handbook 8719.14 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 SCOPE...........................................................................................................................13 1.1 Purpose................................................................................................................................ 13 1.2 Applicability ....................................................................................................................... 13 2 APPLICABLE AND REFERENCE DOCUMENTS................................................14 3 ACRONYMS AND DEFINITIONS ...........................................................................15 3.1 Acronyms............................................................................................................................ 15 3.2 Definitions .......................................................................................................................... 20 4 Technical Material........................................................................................................23 4.1 Introduction......................................................................................................................... 23 4.1.1 References.................................................................................................................... 26 4.2 The Current Orbital Debris Environment ........................................................................... 26 4.2.1 Introduction.................................................................................................................. 26 4.2.2 Sources of Debris and Distributions ............................................................................ 26 4.2.3 Debris Count (> 10 cm) Graphs and Figures............................................................... 28 4.2.4 Breakups ...................................................................................................................... 31 4.2.5 Debris Causes and Counts ........................................................................................... 31 4.2.6 Effects of Debris Collisions......................................................................................... 33 4.2.7 Uncertainty................................................................................................................... 33 4.2.8 References.................................................................................................................... 34 4.3 Future Environment ............................................................................................................ 34 4.3.1 Introduction.................................................................................................................. 34 4.3.2 Debris Count ................................................................................................................ 35 4.3.3 Launch Activity ........................................................................................................... 37 4.3.4 Implications.................................................................................................................. 39 4.3.5 References.................................................................................................................... 40 4.4 Measurements of the Orbital Debris Environment............................................................. 41 4.4.1 Introduction.................................................................................................................. 41 4.4.2 The U.S. Space Surveillance Network......................................................................... 42 4.4.3 Radar Measurements.................................................................................................... 61 4.4.4 Optical Measurements ................................................................................................. 74 4.4.5 In Situ Measurements................................................................................................... 88 4.4.6 References.................................................................................................................... 93 4.5 Modeling the Orbital Debris Environment ......................................................................... 98 Page 7 of 174 NASA-Handbook 8719.14 4.5.1 Introduction.................................................................................................................. 98 4.5.2 Applicability of an Engineering Model ..................................................................... 101 4.5.3 LEGEND.................................................................................................................... 122 4.5.4 References.................................................................................................................. 130 4.6 Micro-Meteoroid Orbital Debris (MMOD) Shielding...................................................... 134 4.6.1 Introduction................................................................................................................ 134 4.6.2 Spacecraft MMOD Environment............................................................................... 135 4.6.3 Shielding Probability of No Penetration Limits......................................................... 135 4.6.4 Risk Assessment Process ........................................................................................... 138 4.6.5 Ballistic Limit Equations ........................................................................................... 141 4.6.6 BUMPER Code.......................................................................................................... 145 4.6.7 Probability of No Penetration and Design Qualification ........................................... 145 4.6.8 Risk Reduction Practices ........................................................................................... 146 4.6.9 Enhanced Shielding ................................................................................................... 147 4.6.10 References................................................................................................................ 149 4.7 Mitigation.......................................................................................................................... 149 4.7.1 Introduction................................................................................................................ 149 4.7.2 History........................................................................................................................ 150 4.7.3 Current Status............................................................................................................. 151 4.7.4 Other Agencies/UN Guidelines ................................................................................. 155 4.7.5 Software Tools........................................................................................................... 156 4.7.6 Future of Mitigation................................................................................................... 157 4.7.7 References.................................................................................................................. 159 4.8 Reentry.............................................................................................................................. 160 4.8.1 Introduction................................................................................................................ 160 4.8.2 Current Status of Reentry Analysis............................................................................ 161 4.8.3 Analyses of Reentry Survival by Other Agencies ..................................................... 165 4.8.4 Future Improvements................................................................................................. 167 4.8.5 References.................................................................................................................. 167 Page 8 of 174 NASA-Handbook 8719.14 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 4.1-1. STS-7 window strike.............................................................................................. 23 Figure 4.1-2. Radiator damage on STS-115. ............................................................................... 24 Figure 4.2-1. Monthly number of cataloged objects in Earth orbit by object type...................... 28 Figure 4.2-2. On-Orbit objects by type........................................................................................ 29 Figure 4.2-3. Causes of satellite breakups. .................................................................................. 32 Figure 4.2-4. Proportion of all cataloged satellite breakup debris............................................... 32 Figure 4.2-5. Proportion of cataloged satellite breakup debris remaining in orbit.....................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Soyuz TMA-11 / Expedition 16 Manuel De La Mission
    Soyuz TMA-11 / Expedition 16 Manuel de la mission SOYUZ TMA-11 – EXPEDITION 16 Par Philippe VOLVERT SOMMAIRE I. Présentation des équipages II. Présentation de la mission III. Présentation du vaisseau Soyuz IV. Précédents équipages de l’ISS V. Chronologie de lancement VI. Procédures d’amarrage VII. Procédures de retour VIII. Horaires IX. Sources A noter que toutes les heures présentes dans ce dossier sont en heure GMT. I. PRESENTATION DES EQUIPAGES Equipage Expedition 15 Fyodor YURCHIKHIN (commandant ISS) Lieu et Lieu et date de naissance : 03/01/1959 ; Batumi (Géorgie) Statut familial : Marié et 2 enfants Etudes : Graduat d’économie à la Moscow Service State University Statut professionnel: Ingénieur et travaille depuis 1993 chez RKKE Roskosmos : Sélectionné le 28/07/1997 (RKKE-13) Précédents vols : STS-112 (07/10/2002 au 18/10/2002), totalisant 10 jours 19h58 Oleg KOTOV(ingénieur de bord) Lieu et date de naissance : 27/10/1965 ; Simferopol (Ukraine) Statut familial : Marié et 2 enfants Etudes : Doctorat en médecine obtenu à la Sergei M. Kirov Military Medicine Academy Statut professionnel: Colonel, Russian Air Force et travaille au centre d’entraînement des cosmonautes, le TsPK Roskosmos : Sélectionné le 09/02/1996 (RKKE-12) Précédents vols : - Clayton Conrad ANDERSON (Ingénieur de vol ISS) Lieu et date de naissance : 23/02/1959 ; Omaha (Nebraska) Statut familial : Marié et 2 enfants Etudes : Promu bachelier en physique à Hastings College, maîtrise en ingénierie aérospatiale à la Iowa State University Statut professionnel: Directeur du centre des opérations de secours à la Nasa Nasa : Sélectionné le 04/06/1998 (Groupe) Précédents vols : - Equipage Expedition 16 / Soyuz TM-11 Peggy A.
    [Show full text]
  • Low Thrust Manoeuvres to Perform Large Changes of RAAN Or Inclination in LEO
    Facoltà di Ingegneria Corso di Laurea Magistrale in Ingegneria Aerospaziale Master Thesis Low Thrust Manoeuvres To Perform Large Changes of RAAN or Inclination in LEO Academic Tutor: Prof. Lorenzo CASALINO Candidate: Filippo GRISOT July 2018 “It is possible for ordinary people to choose to be extraordinary” E. Musk ii Filippo Grisot – Master Thesis iii Filippo Grisot – Master Thesis Acknowledgments I would like to address my sincere acknowledgments to my professor Lorenzo Casalino, for your huge help in these moths, for your willingness, for your professionalism and for your kindness. It was very stimulating, as well as fun, working with you. I would like to thank all my course-mates, for the time spent together inside and outside the “Poli”, for the help in passing the exams, for the fun and the desperation we shared throughout these years. I would like to especially express my gratitude to Emanuele, Gianluca, Giulia, Lorenzo and Fabio who, more than everyone, had to bear with me. I would like to also thank all my extra-Poli friends, especially Alberto, for your support and the long talks throughout these years, Zach, for being so close although the great distance between us, Bea’s family, for all the Sundays and summers spent together, and my soccer team Belfiga FC, for being the crazy lovable people you are. A huge acknowledgment needs to be address to my family: to my grandfather Luciano, for being a great friend; to my grandmother Bianca, for teaching me what “fighting” means; to my grandparents Beppe and Etta, for protecting me
    [Show full text]
  • Frequently Asked Questions
    Frequently Asked Questions What Types of Companies Are on the "Don't Test" List? This list includes companies that make cosmetics, personal-care products, household-cleaning products, and other common household products. All companies that are included on PETA's "don't test" list have signed our statement of assurance verifying that they and their ingredient suppliers don't conduct, commission, pay for, or allow any tests on animals for ingredients, formulations, or finished products anywhere in the world and will not do so in the future. We encourage consumers to support the companies on this list, since we know that they're committed to making products without harming animals. Companies on the "Do Test" list should be shunned until they implement a policy that prohibits animal testing. The "do test" list doesn't include companies that manufacture only products that are required by law to be tested on animals (e.g., pharmaceuticals and garden chemicals). Although PETA is opposed to all animal testing, our focus in those instances is less on the individual companies and more on the regulatory agencies that require animal testing. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Legend V - The company makes or sells strictly vegan products. L - The company has licensed PETA's official cruelty-free bunny logo. F - The company is a PETA Business Friend, and shopping at this company supports an innovative partnership for compassionate companies willing to assist in PETA's groundbreaking work to stop animal abuse and suffering. Companies Whose Products Are Available in Russian Federation L F 100% Pure 510-836-6500 http://www.100percentpure.com L 3INA https://3ina.com/ V L 66°30 https://66-30.com/en/ V L Abyssal Japan Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Observing from Space Orbits, Constraints, Planning, Coordination
    Observing from Space Orbits, constraints, planning, coordination Integral XMM-Newton Jan-Uwe Ness European Space Astronomy Centre (ESAC) Villafranca del Castillo, Spain On behalf of the Integral and XMM-Newton Science Operations Centres Slide 1 Observing from Space - Orbits http://sci.esa.int/integral/59688-integral-fifteen-years-in-orbit/ Slide 2 Observing from Space - Orbits Highly elliptical Earth orbit: XMM-Newton, Integral, Chandra Slide 3 Observing from Space - Orbits Low-Earth orbit: ~1.5 hour, examples: Hubble Space Telescope Swift NuSTAR Fermi Earth blocking, especially low declination objects Only short snapshots of a few 100s possible No long uninterrupted observations Only partial overlap with Integral/XMM possible Slide 4 Observing from Space - Orbits Orbit around Lagrange point L2 past: future: Herschel James Webb Planck Athena present: Gaia Slide 5 Observing from Space – Constraints Motivations for constraints: • Safety of space-craft and instruments • Contamination by bright optical/X-ray sources or straylight from them • Functionality of star Tracker • Power supply (solar panels) • Thermal stability (avoid heat from the sun) • Ground contact for remote commanding and downlink of data Space-specific constraints in bold orange Slide 6 Observing from Space – Constraints Examples for constraints: • No observations while passing through radiation belts • Orientation of space craft to sun • Large avoidance angles around Sun and anti-Sun, Moon, Earth, Bright planets • No slewing over Moon and Earth (planets ok) • Availability
    [Show full text]
  • Landsat Collection 2
    Landsat Collection 2 Landsat Collection 2 marks the second major reprocessing of the U.S. Geological Top of atmosphere Surface reflectance Surface temperature Survey (USGS) Landsat archive. In 2016, the USGS formally reorganized the Landsat archive into a tiered collection inventory structure in recognition of the need for consis- tent Landsat 1–8 sensor data and in anticipa- tion of future periodic reprocessing of the archive to reflect new sensor calibration and geolocation knowledge. Landsat Collections ensure that all Landsat Level-1 data are con- sistently calibrated and processed and retain traceability of data quality provenance. Bremerton Landsat Collection 2 introduces improvements that harness recent advance- ments in data processing, algorithm develop- ment, data access, and distribution capabili- N ties. Collection 2 includes Landsat Level-1 data for all sensors (including Landsat 9, Figure 1. Landsat 5 Collection 2 Level-1 top of atmosphere (TOA; left). Corresponding when launched) since 1972 and global Collection 2 Level-2 surface reflectance (SR; center) and surface temperature (ST [K]; right) Level-2 surface reflectance and surface images. temperature scene-based products for data acquired since 1982 starting with the Landsat Digital Elevation Models Thematic Mapper (TM) sensor era (fig. 1). The primary improvements of Collection 2 data include Collection 2 uses the 3-arc-second (90-meter) digital eleva- • rebaselining the Landsat 8 Operational Landsat Imager tion modeling sources listed and illustrated below. (OLI) Ground
    [Show full text]
  • A Systematic Review of Landsat Data for Change Detection Applications: 50 Years of Monitoring the Earth
    remote sensing Review A Systematic Review of Landsat Data for Change Detection Applications: 50 Years of Monitoring the Earth MohammadAli Hemati 1 , Mahdi Hasanlou 1 , Masoud Mahdianpari 2,3,* and Fariba Mohammadimanesh 2 1 School of Surveying and Geospatial Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran 14174-66191, Iran; [email protected] (M.H.); [email protected] (M.H.) 2 C-CORE, 1 Morrissey Road, St. John’s, NL A1B 3X5, Canada; [email protected] 3 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL A1C 5S7, Canada * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: With uninterrupted space-based data collection since 1972, Landsat plays a key role in systematic monitoring of the Earth’s surface, enabled by an extensive and free, radiometrically consistent, global archive of imagery. Governments and international organizations rely on Landsat time series for monitoring and deriving a systematic understanding of the dynamics of the Earth’s surface at a spatial scale relevant to management, scientific inquiry, and policy development. In this study, we identify trends in Landsat-informed change detection studies by surveying 50 years of published applications, processing, and change detection methods. Specifically, a representative database was created resulting in 490 relevant journal articles derived from the Web of Science and Scopus. From these articles, we provide a review of recent developments, opportunities, and trends in Landsat change detection studies. The impact of the Landsat free and open data policy in 2008 is evident in the literature as a turning point in the number and nature of change detection Citation: Hemati, M.; Hasanlou, M.; studies.
    [Show full text]
  • NOAA TM GLERL-33. Categorization of Northern Green Bay Ice Cover
    NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL GLERL-33 CATEGORIZATION OF NORTHERN GREEN BAY ICE COVER USING LANDSAT 1 DIGITAL DATA - A CASE STUDY George A. Leshkevich Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory Ann Arbor, Michigan January 1981 UNITED STATES NATIONAL OCEANIC AND Environmental Research DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AlMOSPHERlC ADMINISTRATION Laboratofks Philip M. Klutznick, Sacratary Richard A Frank, Administrator Joseph 0. Fletcher, Acting Director NOTICE The NOAA Environmental Research Laboratories do not approve, recommend, or endorse any proprietary product or proprietary material mentioned in this publication. No reference shall be made to the NOAA Environmental Research Laboratories, or to this publication furnished by the NOAA Environmental Research Laboratories, in any advertising or sales promotion which would indicate or imply that the NOAA Environmental Research Laboratories approve, recommend, or endorse any proprietary product or proprietary material men- tioned herein, or which has as its purpose an intent to cause directly or indirectly the advertized product to be used or purchased because of this NOAA Environmental Research Laboratories publication. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Abstract 1. INTRODUCTION 2. DATA SOURCE AND DESCRIPTION OF STUDY AREA 2.1 Data Source 2.2 Description of Study Area 3. DATA ANALYSIS 3.1 Equipment 3.2 Approach 5 4. RESULTS 8 5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 6. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 17 7. REFERENCES 17 8. SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY 19 iii FIGURES Page 1. Area covered by LANDSAT 1 scene, February 13, 1975. 3 2. LANDSAT 1 false-color image, February 13, 1975, and trainin:: set locations (by group number). 4 3. Transformed variables (1 and 2) for snow covered land (group 13) plotted arouwl the group means for snow- covered ice (group 15).
    [Show full text]
  • Panagiotis Karampelas Thirimachos Bourlai Editors Technologies for Civilian, Military and Cyber Surveillance
    Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications Panagiotis Karampelas Thirimachos Bourlai Editors Surveillance in Action Technologies for Civilian, Military and Cyber Surveillance Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications Series editor Anthony J. Masys, Centre for Security Science, Ottawa, ON, Canada Advisory Board Gisela Bichler, California State University, San Bernardino, CA, USA Thirimachos Bourlai, WVU - Statler College of Engineering and Mineral Resources, Morgantown, WV, USA Chris Johnson, University of Glasgow, UK Panagiotis Karampelas, Hellenic Air Force Academy, Attica, Greece Christian Leuprecht, Royal Military College of Canada, Kingston, ON, Canada Edward C. Morse, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA David Skillicorn, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada Yoshiki Yamagata, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Japan The series Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications comprises interdisciplinary research covering the theory, foundations and domain-specific topics pertaining to security. Publications within the series are peer-reviewed monographs and edited works in the areas of: – biological and chemical threat recognition and detection (e.g., biosensors, aerosols, forensics) – crisis and disaster management – terrorism – cyber security and secure information systems (e.g., encryption, optical and photonic systems) – traditional and non-traditional security – energy, food and resource security – economic security and securitization (including associated
    [Show full text]
  • Information Summaries
    TIROS 8 12/21/63 Delta-22 TIROS-H (A-53) 17B S National Aeronautics and TIROS 9 1/22/65 Delta-28 TIROS-I (A-54) 17A S Space Administration TIROS Operational 2TIROS 10 7/1/65 Delta-32 OT-1 17B S John F. Kennedy Space Center 2ESSA 1 2/3/66 Delta-36 OT-3 (TOS) 17A S Information Summaries 2 2 ESSA 2 2/28/66 Delta-37 OT-2 (TOS) 17B S 2ESSA 3 10/2/66 2Delta-41 TOS-A 1SLC-2E S PMS 031 (KSC) OSO (Orbiting Solar Observatories) Lunar and Planetary 2ESSA 4 1/26/67 2Delta-45 TOS-B 1SLC-2E S June 1999 OSO 1 3/7/62 Delta-8 OSO-A (S-16) 17A S 2ESSA 5 4/20/67 2Delta-48 TOS-C 1SLC-2E S OSO 2 2/3/65 Delta-29 OSO-B2 (S-17) 17B S Mission Launch Launch Payload Launch 2ESSA 6 11/10/67 2Delta-54 TOS-D 1SLC-2E S OSO 8/25/65 Delta-33 OSO-C 17B U Name Date Vehicle Code Pad Results 2ESSA 7 8/16/68 2Delta-58 TOS-E 1SLC-2E S OSO 3 3/8/67 Delta-46 OSO-E1 17A S 2ESSA 8 12/15/68 2Delta-62 TOS-F 1SLC-2E S OSO 4 10/18/67 Delta-53 OSO-D 17B S PIONEER (Lunar) 2ESSA 9 2/26/69 2Delta-67 TOS-G 17B S OSO 5 1/22/69 Delta-64 OSO-F 17B S Pioneer 1 10/11/58 Thor-Able-1 –– 17A U Major NASA 2 1 OSO 6/PAC 8/9/69 Delta-72 OSO-G/PAC 17A S Pioneer 2 11/8/58 Thor-Able-2 –– 17A U IMPROVED TIROS OPERATIONAL 2 1 OSO 7/TETR 3 9/29/71 Delta-85 OSO-H/TETR-D 17A S Pioneer 3 12/6/58 Juno II AM-11 –– 5 U 3ITOS 1/OSCAR 5 1/23/70 2Delta-76 1TIROS-M/OSCAR 1SLC-2W S 2 OSO 8 6/21/75 Delta-112 OSO-1 17B S Pioneer 4 3/3/59 Juno II AM-14 –– 5 S 3NOAA 1 12/11/70 2Delta-81 ITOS-A 1SLC-2W S Launches Pioneer 11/26/59 Atlas-Able-1 –– 14 U 3ITOS 10/21/71 2Delta-86 ITOS-B 1SLC-2E U OGO (Orbiting Geophysical
    [Show full text]
  • Constellation Program Overview
    Constellation Program Overview October 2008 hris Culbert anager, Lunar Surface Systems Project Office ASA/Johnson Space Center Constellation Program EarthEarth DepartureDeparture OrionOrion -- StageStage CrewCrew ExplorationExploration VehicleVehicle AresAres VV -- HeavyHeavy LiftLift LaunchLaunch VehicleVehicle AltairAltair LunarLunar LanderLander AresAres II -- CrewCrew LaunchLaunch VehicleVehicle Lunar Capabilities Concept Review EstablishedEstablished Lunar Lunar Transportation Transportation EstablishEstablish Lunar Lunar Surface SurfaceArchitecturesArchitectures ArchitectureArchitecture Point Point of of Departure: Departure: StrategiesStrategies which: which: Satisfy NASA NGO’s to acceptable degree ProvidesProvides crew crew & & cargo cargo delivery delivery to to & & from from the the Satisfy NASA NGO’s to acceptable degree within acceptable schedule moonmoon within acceptable schedule Are consistent with capacity and capabilities ProvidesProvides capacity capacity and and ca capabilitiespabilities consistent consistent Are consistent with capacity and capabilities withwith candidate candidate surface surface architectures architectures ofof the the transportation transportation systems systems ProvidesProvides sufficient sufficient performance performance margins margins IncludeInclude set set of of options options fo for rvarious various prioritizations prioritizations of cost, schedule & risk RemainsRemains within within programmatic programmatic constraints constraints of cost, schedule & risk ResultsResults in in acceptable
    [Show full text]
  • SEER for Hardware's Cost Model for Future Orbital Concepts (“FAR OUT”)
    Presented at the 2008 SCEA-ISPA Joint Annual Conference and Training Workshop - www.iceaaonline.com SEER for Hardware’s Cost Model for Future Orbital Concepts (“FAR OUT”) Lee Fischman ISPA/SCEA Industry Hills 2008 Presented at the 2008 SCEA-ISPA Joint Annual Conference and Training Workshop - www.iceaaonline.com Introduction A model for predicting the cost of long term unmanned orbital spacecraft (Far Out) has been developed at the request of AFRL. Far Out has been integrated into SEER for Hardware. This presentation discusses the Far Out project and resulting model. © 2008 Galorath Incorporated Presented at the 2008 SCEA-ISPA Joint Annual Conference and Training Workshop - www.iceaaonline.com Goals • Estimate space satellites in any earth orbit. Deep space exploration missions may be considered as data is available, or may be an area for further research in Phase 3. • Estimate concepts to be launched 10-20 years into the future. • Cost missions ranging from exploratory to strategic, with a specific range decided based on estimating reliability. The most reliable estimates are likely to be in the middle of this range. • Estimates will include hardware, software, systems engineering, and production. • Handle either government or commercial missions, either “one-of-a-kind” or constellations. • Be used in a “top-down” manner using relatively less specific mission resumes, similar to those available from sources such as the Earth Observation Portal or Janes Space Directory. © 2008 Galorath Incorporated Presented at the 2008 SCEA-ISPA Joint Annual Conference and Training Workshop - www.iceaaonline.com Challenge: Technology Change Over Time Evolution in bus technologies Evolution in payload technologies and performance 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Hambletonian Driver Records
    HAMBLETONIAN DRIVER RECORDS DRIVERS WITH MOST HAMBLETONIAN VICTORIES SIX FOUR THREE John Campbell Ben White Henry Thomas Mack Lobell (1987) Mary Reynolds (1933) Shirley Hanover (1937) Armbro Goal (1988) Rosalind (1936) McLin Hanover (1938) Harmonious (1990) The Ambassador (1942) Yankee Maid (1944) Tagliabue (1995) Volo Song (1943) Thomas trained all three horses. Muscles Yankee (1998) White was also the trainer of all four Howard Beissinger Glidemaster (2006) horses. He also trained the 1927 winner Lindy’s Pride (1969) Iosola’s Worthy. Speedy Crown (1971) Bill Haughton Speedy Somolli (1978) Christopher T (1974) Beissinger trained all three horses. Steve Lobell (1976) Del Cameron Green Speed (1977) Newport Dream (1954) Burgomeister (1980) Egyptian Candor (1965) Haughton was also the trainer of the four Speedy Streak (1967) horses. He also trained 1982 winner Cameron trained Newport Dream. Speed Bowl, who was driven The other two were catch drives. by his son, Tom. Ron Pierce Stanley Dancer American Winner (1993) Nevele Pride (1968) Donato Hanover (2007) Super Bowl (1972) Muscle Massive (2010) Bonefish (1975) Duenna (1983) Dancer also trained all four horses. He Brian Sears also trained 1965 winner Egyptian Candor, Muscle Hill (2009) who was driven to victory by Del Cameron Royalty For Life (2013) Pinkman (2015) Mike Lachance Victory Dream (1994) Continentalvictory (1996) Self Possessed (1999) Amigo Hall (2003) YOUNGEST DRIVER TO WIN OLDEST DRIVER TO WIN Tom Haughton Bion Shively 1982 – Speed Bowl 1952 – Sharp Note Haughton was 25 years, 5 months and 10 days old. Shively was 74 years, 4 months and 12 days old. Note: Walter Paisley was the youngest driver to ever compete in the Hambletonian.
    [Show full text]