Freshwater Wetlands and This Is Increasing As Population Grows Along the Coast
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Southern Gulf, Queensland
Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations. -
Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Dark Septate Fungi in Plants Associated with Aquatic Environments Doi: 10.1590/0102-33062016Abb0296
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and dark septate fungi in plants associated with aquatic environments doi: 10.1590/0102-33062016abb0296 Table S1. Presence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and/or dark septate fungi (DSF) in non-flowering plants and angiosperms, according to data from 62 papers. A: arbuscule; V: vesicle; H: intraradical hyphae; % COL: percentage of colonization. MYCORRHIZAL SPECIES AMF STRUCTURES % AMF COL AMF REFERENCES DSF DSF REFERENCES LYCOPODIOPHYTA1 Isoetales Isoetaceae Isoetes coromandelina L. A, V, H 43 38; 39 Isoetes echinospora Durieu A, V, H 1.9-14.5 50 + 50 Isoetes kirkii A. Braun not informed not informed 13 Isoetes lacustris L.* A, V, H 25-50 50; 61 + 50 Lycopodiales Lycopodiaceae Lycopodiella inundata (L.) Holub A, V 0-18 22 + 22 MONILOPHYTA2 Equisetales Equisetaceae Equisetum arvense L. A, V 2-28 15; 19; 52; 60 + 60 Osmundales Osmundaceae Osmunda cinnamomea L. A, V 10 14 Salviniales Marsileaceae Marsilea quadrifolia L.* V, H not informed 19;38 Salviniaceae Azolla pinnata R. Br.* not informed not informed 19 Salvinia cucullata Roxb* not informed 21 4; 19 Salvinia natans Pursh V, H not informed 38 Polipodiales Dryopteridaceae Polystichum lepidocaulon (Hook.) J. Sm. A, V not informed 30 Davalliaceae Davallia mariesii T. Moore ex Baker A not informed 30 Onocleaceae Matteuccia struthiopteris (L.) Tod. A not informed 30 Onoclea sensibilis L. A, V 10-70 14; 60 + 60 Pteridaceae Acrostichum aureum L. A, V, H 27-69 42; 55 Adiantum pedatum L. A not informed 30 Aleuritopteris argentea (S. G. Gmel) Fée A, V not informed 30 Pteris cretica L. A not informed 30 Pteris multifida Poir. -
Flora and Vegetation Gap Analysis
Flora and Vegetation Survey Gap Analysis Woodie Woodie Mine Prepared By Prepared For MBS Environmental and Consolidated Minerals Date January 2020 DOCUMENT STATUS VERSION TYPE AUTHOR/S REVIEWER/S DATE DISTRIBUTED V1 Internal review E.M. Mattiske - - V2 Draft for client E.M. Mattiske E. Mattiske 17/12/2019 FINAL Final report L. Rowles/E. Mattiske E. Mattiske 15/01/2020 (ACN 063 507 175, ABN 39 063 507 175) PO Box 437 Kalamunda WA 6926 Phone: +61 8 9257 1625 Email: [email protected] COPYRIGHT AND DISCLAIMER Copyright The information contained in this report is the property of Mattiske Consulting Pty Ltd. The use or copying of the whole or any part of this report without the written permission of Mattiske Consulting Pty Ltd is not permitted. Disclaimer This report has been prepared on behalf of and for the exclusive use of MBS Environmental, and is subject to and issued in accordance with the agreement between MBS Environmental and Mattiske Consulting Pty Ltd. This report is based on the scope of services defined by MBS Environmental, the budgetary and time constraints imposed by MBS Environmental, and the methods consistent with the preceding. Mattiske Consulting Pty Ltd has utilised information and data supplied by MBS Environmental (and its agents), and sourced from government databases, literature, departments and agencies in the preparation of this report. Mattiske Consulting Pty Ltd has compiled this report on the basis that any supplied or sourced information and data was accurate at the time of publication. Mattiske Consulting Pty Ltd accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for the use of, or reliance upon, the whole or any part of this report by any third party. -
Flora and Vegetation Assessment
FLORA AND VEGETATION ASSESSMENT WOODIE WOODIE MINESITE EXPANSION Prepared By Prepared For MBS Environmental December 2019 DOCUMENT STATUS DOCUMENT REFERENCE: MBS1902/72/19 VERSION TYPE AUTHOR/S REVIEWER/S DATE DISTRIBUTED V1 Internal review L Rowles E Chetwin V2 Draft for client L Rowles/E Chetwin E Mattiske 1/11/2019 FINAL Final report L Rowles E Mattiske 11/12/2019 (ACN 063 507 175, ABN 39 063 507 175) PO Box 437 Kalamunda WA 6926 Phone: +61 8 9257 1625 Email: [email protected] COPYRIGHT AND DISCLAIMER Copyright The information contained in this report is the property of Mattiske Consulting Pty Ltd. The use or copying of the whole or any part of this report without the written permission of Mattiske Consulting Pty Ltd is not permitted. Disclaimer This report has been prepared on behalf of and for the exclusive use of MBS Environmental, and is subject to and issued in accordance with the agreement between MBS Environmental and Mattiske Consulting Pty Ltd. This report is based on the scope of services defined by MBS Environmental, the budgetary and time constraints imposed by MBS Environmental, and the methods consistent with the preceding. Mattiske Consulting Pty Ltd has utilised information and data supplied by MBS Environmental (and its agents), and sourced from government databases, literature, departments and agencies in the preparation of this report. Mattiske Consulting Pty Ltd has compiled this report on the basis that any supplied or sourced information and data was accurate at the time of publication. Mattiske Consulting Pty Ltd accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for the use of, or reliance upon, the whole or any part of this report by any third party. -
Potamogetonaceae, Zosteraceae
Flora Malesiana, Series I, Volume 16 (2002) 167-216 Potamogetonaceae, Zosteraceae, and Cymodoceaceae 1 C. den Hartog Nijmegen, The Netherlands & G. Wiegleb Cottbus, Germany) Introductionto thesea-grasses (C. den Hartog) In earlier papers the sea-grasses were classifiedwithin two families, the Potamogetona- and the As result of research of all of the ceae Hydrocharitaceae. a thorough genera order Helobiae (Alismatidae) by Tomlinson (1982), it has become evident that the very heterogeneous family Potamogetonaceae had to be split into a number of independent families. The sea-grasses which already had subfamily status, became families in their own right, the Cymodoceaceae the Zosteraceae and the Posidoniaceae (not in Malesia). , , The independence of these families is not contradicted by molecular genetical evidence (Les et al. 1997). According to the new vision the Potamogetonaceae are restricted to the genera Potamogeton, Groenlandia (not in Malesia), and Ruppia; however, there are of its molecular genetic indications that the latter genus may present a family own (Les et al. 1997). Therefore, and because of the comparable role in the vegetation of the dif- ferent introduction to in is here, with to the genera, an sea-grasses general given a Key different families and genera of sea-grasses. The phytochemistry of all these groups is given by R. Hegnauer. The few angiosperms that have penetrated into the marine environment, and are able to fulfiltheir vegetative and generative cycle when completely submerged, are generally known as sea-grasses. The name refers to the superficial resemblance to grasses, be- cause ofthe linear leaves of most of the species. In spite of the fact that the numberof sea-grass species is very small (only 60 to 65), they are of paramount importance in the coastal environment, where, when they occur, they generally form extensive beds. -
Nutrient Cycling and the Role of Arbuscular Mycorrhizae in Created and Natural Wetlands of Central Ohio
Nutrient Cycling and the Role of Arbuscular Mycorrhizae in Created and Natural Wetlands of Central Ohio DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Katie Hossler, B.S., M.S. Environmental Science Graduate Program The Ohio State University 2010 Dissertation Committee: Professor Virginie Bouchard, Co-Advisor Professor Robert J. Gates, Co-Advisor Professor Siobhan Fennessy Professor Dawn Gibas Ferris Professor Richard Moore c Copyright by Katie Hossler 2010 ABSTRACT This dissertation details a comprehensive study of the ecology and development of the soil and carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus cycles in freshwater marshes. Beyond broadening our understanding of wetland development and ecology, this work intents to enlighten evaluation of wetland mitigation policy, as well as facilitate the success of wetland creation projects. Ten created and five natural freshwater marshes of central Ohio are the focus throughout the study. One of the central chapters (Ch. 3) compares structure and function between created and natural wetlands. The most important finding is that there are significant differences between created and natural wetland soils; this leads to smaller nutrient stocks and slower nutrient cycles in the created wetlands. Time-to-equilibrium estimates for the development of soil and nutrient-related functions are explored in Ch. 4. It is determined that overcoming these differences will require more time than is acceptable for most mitigation policies. The final two chapters explore the habit and ecology of arbuscular mycorrhizae (AM) in created and natural marshes. The presence of AM was high in both created and natural wetlands and across created wetland age. -
POTAMOGETON.Even Though It Has Lavania (1 979) Reported Epidermal Structure Been Criticized by St
BULL. BOT. SURV.INDIA Vol. 43,Nos. 1-4 :pp. 151-194,2001 A REVISION OF FAMILY POTAMOGETONACEAE OF INDIA Botanical Survey of India, Pune ABSTRACT 'Potamogetonaceae' includes 2 genera and ca 100 species distributed in temperate and tropical regions of World. The present paper deals with its 2 genera viz., POTA~OGETONL. including 17 species and 2 varieties and GROENLAND~AGay with 1 species represented in India. Key to genera, subgenera and species as well as necessary illustrations are given for clear identity. Short description of each species including its correct binomial, basionym if any and synonyms, morphological characters, phenology, distribution in India as well as world, ecological notes and uses if any are provided. Specimens examined and approved acronyms of the herbaria where the specimens are deposited are cited. INTRODUCTION by Dumort in 1827. Formerly the family was included under Najadales by Bentham & The family Potamogetonaceae is Hooker f (1880) and J. D. Hooker (1893). represented by 2 genera viz. POTAMOGETONL. Later on Rendle (1904) placed it under including 17 species and two varieties and Helobiales. Hutchinson (1960) placed the GROENLANDIAGay with 1 species. Genus family under Potamogetonales and POTAMWETONI,. constitutes a natural genus segregated family Potamogetonaceae from with about 100 species (Airy Shaw, 1966), Ruppiaceae based on its fresh water habit, wide spread throughout the world except in flower's perianth with 4 free clawed segments polar regions, while GROENLAND~AGay is arranged valvately, lateral ovules and sessile restricted to W. Asia, N. W. Africa, N. fruiting carpels. America, Syria and Turkey. Potamogetonaceae is worked out by Potamogetonaceae, was first established number of Indian and foreign wotlters at Date of receipt :03/01/2001, Date of acceptance : 31110/2001. -
Greater Paraburdoo Iron Ore Hub: Aquatic Fauna Survey Interim Report
Greater Paraburdoo: Aquatic Fauna Survey Interim Report 2019 1.1.1.1.1 Cattle Gorge & Callawa Aquatic Survey Greater Paraburdoo Iron Ore Hub: Aquatic Fauna Survey Interim Report: Dry Season 2019 Biologic Environmental Survey Report to Rio Tinto Iron Ore March 2020 DOCUMENT STATUS Version Review / Approved for Approved for Issue to Author No. Issue Name Date 1 Jess Delaney 2 Final “IMPORTANT NOTE” Apart from fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism, or review as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part of this report, its attachments or appendices may be reproduced by any process without the written consent of Biologic Environmental Survey Pty Ltd (“Biologic”). All enquiries should be directed to Biologic. We have prepared this report for the sole purposes of BHP Pty Ltd (“Client”) for the specific purpose only for which it is supplied. This report is strictly limited to the Purpose and the facts and matters stated in it do not apply directly or indirectly and will not be used for any other application, purpose, use or matter. In preparing this report we have made certain assumptions. We have assumed that all information and documents provided to us by the Client or as a result of a specific request or enquiry were complete, accurate and up-to-date. Where we have obtained information from a government register or database, we have assumed that the information is accurate. Where an assumption has been made, we have not made any independent investigations with respect to the matters the subject of that assumption. We are not aware of any reason why any of the assumptions are incorrect. -
Freshwater Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity Values of the Beijiang River, China
Freshwater ecosystem services and biodiversity values of the Beijiang River, China Freshwater ecosystem services and biodiversity values of the Beijiang River, China Work Package 3 report: Highland Aquatic Resources Conservation and Sustainable Development (HighARCS) South China Agricultural University Luo Shiming, Cai Kunzheng Zhao Huihong, Cui Ke, Gan Lian, Fu Jinghua Zhuang Xueying, Tong Xiaoli Zhang Jia’en, Ye Yanqong, Li Huashou, He Hongzhi October 2011 1 Freshwater ecosystem services and biodiversity values of the Beijiang River, China Table of contents Acknowledgments ...................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 5 1.1. About this report ............................................................................................................................. 5 1.2. Background ...................................................................................................................................... 5 2. Site maps ................................................................................................................................................ 7 3. Biodiversity within the Beijiang River ................................................................................................... 12 3.1. Chosen taxonomic groups ............................................................................................................ -
Glenelg Hopkins, Victoria
Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations. -
Lower Murray Darling, New South Wales
Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.