Nutrient Cycling and the Role of Arbuscular Mycorrhizae in Created and Natural Wetlands of Central Ohio

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Nutrient Cycling and the Role of Arbuscular Mycorrhizae in Created and Natural Wetlands of Central Ohio Nutrient Cycling and the Role of Arbuscular Mycorrhizae in Created and Natural Wetlands of Central Ohio DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Katie Hossler, B.S., M.S. Environmental Science Graduate Program The Ohio State University 2010 Dissertation Committee: Professor Virginie Bouchard, Co-Advisor Professor Robert J. Gates, Co-Advisor Professor Siobhan Fennessy Professor Dawn Gibas Ferris Professor Richard Moore c Copyright by Katie Hossler 2010 ABSTRACT This dissertation details a comprehensive study of the ecology and development of the soil and carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus cycles in freshwater marshes. Beyond broadening our understanding of wetland development and ecology, this work intents to enlighten evaluation of wetland mitigation policy, as well as facilitate the success of wetland creation projects. Ten created and five natural freshwater marshes of central Ohio are the focus throughout the study. One of the central chapters (Ch. 3) compares structure and function between created and natural wetlands. The most important finding is that there are significant differences between created and natural wetland soils; this leads to smaller nutrient stocks and slower nutrient cycles in the created wetlands. Time-to-equilibrium estimates for the development of soil and nutrient-related functions are explored in Ch. 4. It is determined that overcoming these differences will require more time than is acceptable for most mitigation policies. The final two chapters explore the habit and ecology of arbuscular mycorrhizae (AM) in created and natural marshes. The presence of AM was high in both created and natural wetlands and across created wetland age. Given their prevalence and known role in other ecosystems, including AM in wetland creation and restoration projects deserves more focus. ii Dedicated to Mom, Dad and Josh, and two gone too soon, somewhere over the rainbow in memory of Sabra June 21, 2007 to January 5, 2010 “my little companion” in honor and memory of Elizabeth “Aunt Liz” Hossler May 12, 1954 to September 11, 2008 loving aunt, professor, and ovarian cancer survivor iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would first like to acknowledge and thank my advisor, Professor Virginie Bouchard— I could not have had a better mentor, both professionally and personally. I am so glad her tenure at Ohio State coincided with my graduate studies, and that, seven years ago, she was willing to take a chance on a very shy former chemist. I thank my committee members, Profs. Siobhan Fennessy, Dawn Ferris, Robert Gates, and Richard Moore for valuable input during the initial and final stages of the project. Thanks especially to Professor Gates for serving as my advisor of record over the past year, and to Professor Moore for joining my committee so late in the process. I also thank Professor Ralph Boerner, who served on my committee until his retirement in 2009. Many long hard hours went into the data collection for this very large project. Special thanks to those who assisted in the field and in the lab: Evelyn Anemaet, Erelyn Apolinar, Amy Barrett, Michael Billmire, Sarah Boley, Ryan Diederick, Gwen Dubelko, Brie Elking, Erica Elliot, Becky Fauver, Michela Gentile, Dan Gillenwater, Jenette Goodman, Ellen Herbert, Kyle Herrman, Melissa Knorr, Matt Lane, Nickla Louisy, Lars Meyer, Diego Perez, Ryan Pulliam, Connie Rice, Abby Rokosch, Jesse Rosenbluth, Erin Rothman, Eric Saas, Rachel Schultz, Lindsay Scott, Heather Sexton, Leslie Smith, Michael Szuter, and Steve Wise. iv Thanks to Columbus Metro Parks, the City of Columbus Recreation and Parks, Groveport-Madison Highschool, the Ohio Department of Natural Resources and sev- eral private landowners for permission to use their properties. And finally, for helping me to get here, thanks to the many teachers, co-workers and friends I have had over the years and to my family and Josh. v VITA June 23, 1974 ...............................Born - Cincinnati, USA 1996 ........................................B.S. Chemistry, University of Notre Dame 2005 ........................................M.S.Environmental Science, The Ohio State University. 2005-present ................................Graduate Research and Teaching Asso- ciate, The Ohio State University. PUBLICATIONS K. Hossler, V. Bouchard “Soil development and establishment of carbon-based prop- erties in created freshwater marshes”. Ecological Applications, 20:539–553, 2010. K. Hossler, V. Bouchard “The joint estimation of soil trace gas fluxes”. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 72:1382–1393, 2008. E.R. Civitello, R.G. Leniek, K.A. Hossler, D.M. Stearns “Synthesis of Peptide- Oligonucleotide Conjugates for Chromium Coordination”. Bioconjugate, 12:459–463, 2001. J.A. Riggs, K.A. Hossler, B.D. Smith, M.J. Karpa, G. Griffin, P.J. Duggan “Nu- cleotide carrier mixture with transport selectivity for ribonucleoside-5’-phosphates”. Tetrahedron Letters, 37:6303–6306, 1996. FIELDS OF STUDY Major Field: Environmental Science Graduate Program vi TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Abstract....................................... ii Dedication...................................... iii Acknowledgments.................................. iv Vita ......................................... vi ListofTables.................................... x ListofFigures ................................... xiii Chapters: 1. Introduction and brief history of wetlands in Ohio . ...... 1 1.1 WetlandsinOhio............................ 2 I Estimation and analysis of carbon flux 6 2. The joint estimation of soil trace gas fluxes . ... 7 2.1 Introduction .............................. 8 2.2 MaterialsandMethods. 18 2.3 Results ................................. 28 2.4 Discussion................................ 33 2.5 Conclusions............................... 37 II Biogeochemical cycles in created and natural wetlands 44 vii 3. No-net-loss not met for nutrient function: recommendations for wetland mitigationpolicies .............................. 45 3.1 SupplementaryInformation . 58 4. The importance of soil to development of plant- and microbial-function in createddepressionalwetlands . 87 4.1 Introduction .............................. 87 4.2 MaterialsandMethods. 92 4.3 Results ................................. 101 4.4 Discussion................................ 127 4.5 Conclusion ............................... 134 III Arbuscular mycorrhizae 136 5. Arbuscular Mycorrhizae in Aquatic Systems: a Review . 137 5.1 Introduction .............................. 137 5.2 Habit of mycorrhizae in aquatic systems . 141 5.3 Ecology of mycorrhizae in aquatic systems . 158 5.4 AMbenefits............................... 164 5.5 Conclusion ............................... 166 6. Arbuscular Mycorrhizae in created and natural wetlands of Ohio . 204 6.1 Introduction .............................. 204 6.2 MaterialsandMethods. 207 6.3 Results ................................. 218 6.4 Discussion................................ 255 6.5 Conclusions............................... 262 Appendices: A. Sitedescriptionsandhistories . 264 A.1 Ballfieldmarsh ............................. 265 A.2 BigIsland................................ 270 A.3 Bluebird................................. 276 A.4 Calamusswamp ............................ 280 A.5 JMB................................... 285 A.6 KilldeerPlains ............................. 289 viii A.7 Mishne ................................. 297 A.8 NewAlbanyCompany ......................... 301 A.9 PickeringtonPonds. 304 A.10Sacks .................................. 310 B. Vegetation surveys and sampling station selection . 313 B.1 Clusteranalysis............................. 313 B.2 Speciesdiversityindices . 316 C. Aerialmapsofwetlandsurveyareas . 323 D. Dendrograms of wetland vegetation survey data . 339 E. Guide to the Identification of Arbuscular Mycorrhizae . 355 Bibliography .................................... 373 ix LIST OF TABLES Table Page 2.1 Description of seven different models for estimating gas flux ..... 27 2.2 Evaluation of model performance for real data . 30 2.3 Evaluation of model performance for simulated data . ..... 40 2.4 Absolute and relative errors for gas flux models . 41 3.1 Structural and functional properties and representative parameters . 50 3.2 C,NandPstocksandfluxes ...................... 55 3.3 Studysitelocationsanddescriptions . 61 3.4 Abiotic structure typeandage .................... 74 ∼ 3.5 Biotic structure typeandage ..................... 76 ∼ 3.6 Nutritional structure typeandage .................. 78 ∼ 3.7 Function typeandage......................... 84 ∼ 3.8 PERMANOVA: function structure .................. 86 ∼ 4.1 Comparison of SEMs for C, N and P cycling . 109 4.2 Developmental trajectories for C, N and P stocks and fluxes . 111 4.3 Developmental trajectories for shoot biomass and ρb by year and com- binedyears ................................ 115 x 4.4 Developmental trajectories for ρb and water-stable aggregates . 118 4.5 Comparison of soil and root properties with depth, by type and age . 124 4.6 Developmental trajectories for ρb and root L:V ratios by depth . 125 4.7 Comparison of SEMs for the effect of time on combined C, N and P cycling................................... 126 5.1 Literature surveys of mycorrhizae in aquatic systems . 142 5.2 Mycorrhizal status for 71 hydrophytes collected from 15 created and naturalmarshes.............................. 148 5.3 Mycorrhizal status by family and order for 952 hydrophytic species . 153 5.4 Annotated
Recommended publications
  • Toward a Resolution of Campanulid Phylogeny, with Special Reference to the Placement of Dipsacales
    TAXON 57 (1) • February 2008: 53–65 Winkworth & al. • Campanulid phylogeny MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS Toward a resolution of Campanulid phylogeny, with special reference to the placement of Dipsacales Richard C. Winkworth1,2, Johannes Lundberg3 & Michael J. Donoghue4 1 Departamento de Botânica, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, Caixa Postal 11461–CEP 05422-970, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. [email protected] (author for correspondence) 2 Current address: School of Biology, Chemistry, and Environmental Sciences, University of the South Pacific, Private Bag, Laucala Campus, Suva, Fiji 3 Department of Phanerogamic Botany, The Swedish Museum of Natural History, Box 50007, 104 05 Stockholm, Sweden 4 Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology and Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, P.O. Box 208106, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8106, U.S.A. Broad-scale phylogenetic analyses of the angiosperms and of the Asteridae have failed to confidently resolve relationships among the major lineages of the campanulid Asteridae (i.e., the euasterid II of APG II, 2003). To address this problem we assembled presently available sequences for a core set of 50 taxa, representing the diver- sity of the four largest lineages (Apiales, Aquifoliales, Asterales, Dipsacales) as well as the smaller “unplaced” groups (e.g., Bruniaceae, Paracryphiaceae, Columelliaceae). We constructed four data matrices for phylogenetic analysis: a chloroplast coding matrix (atpB, matK, ndhF, rbcL), a chloroplast non-coding matrix (rps16 intron, trnT-F region, trnV-atpE IGS), a combined chloroplast dataset (all seven chloroplast regions), and a combined genome matrix (seven chloroplast regions plus 18S and 26S rDNA). Bayesian analyses of these datasets using mixed substitution models produced often well-resolved and supported trees.
    [Show full text]
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts
    The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: A County Checklist • First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Somers Bruce Sorrie and Paul Connolly, Bryan Cullina, Melissa Dow Revision • First A County Checklist Plants of Massachusetts: Vascular The A County Checklist First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Massachusetts Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program The Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program (NHESP), part of the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, is one of the programs forming the Natural Heritage network. NHESP is responsible for the conservation and protection of hundreds of species that are not hunted, fished, trapped, or commercially harvested in the state. The Program's highest priority is protecting the 176 species of vertebrate and invertebrate animals and 259 species of native plants that are officially listed as Endangered, Threatened or of Special Concern in Massachusetts. Endangered species conservation in Massachusetts depends on you! A major source of funding for the protection of rare and endangered species comes from voluntary donations on state income tax forms. Contributions go to the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Fund, which provides a portion of the operating budget for the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program. NHESP protects rare species through biological inventory,
    [Show full text]
  • Apiaceae) - Beds, Old Cambs, Hunts, Northants and Peterborough
    CHECKLIST OF UMBELLIFERS (APIACEAE) - BEDS, OLD CAMBS, HUNTS, NORTHANTS AND PETERBOROUGH Scientific name Common Name Beds old Cambs Hunts Northants and P'boro Aegopodium podagraria Ground-elder common common common common Aethusa cynapium Fool's Parsley common common common common Ammi majus Bullwort very rare rare very rare very rare Ammi visnaga Toothpick-plant very rare very rare Anethum graveolens Dill very rare rare very rare Angelica archangelica Garden Angelica very rare very rare Angelica sylvestris Wild Angelica common frequent frequent common Anthriscus caucalis Bur Chervil occasional frequent occasional occasional Anthriscus cerefolium Garden Chervil extinct extinct extinct very rare Anthriscus sylvestris Cow Parsley common common common common Apium graveolens Wild Celery rare occasional very rare native ssp. Apium inundatum Lesser Marshwort very rare or extinct very rare extinct very rare Apium nodiflorum Fool's Water-cress common common common common Astrantia major Astrantia extinct very rare Berula erecta Lesser Water-parsnip occasional frequent occasional occasional x Beruladium procurrens Fool's Water-cress x Lesser very rare Water-parsnip Bunium bulbocastanum Great Pignut occasional very rare Bupleurum rotundifolium Thorow-wax extinct extinct extinct extinct Bupleurum subovatum False Thorow-wax very rare very rare very rare Bupleurum tenuissimum Slender Hare's-ear very rare extinct very rare or extinct Carum carvi Caraway very rare very rare very rare extinct Chaerophyllum temulum Rough Chervil common common common common Cicuta virosa Cowbane extinct extinct Conium maculatum Hemlock common common common common Conopodium majus Pignut frequent occasional occasional frequent Coriandrum sativum Coriander rare occasional very rare very rare Daucus carota Wild Carrot common common common common Eryngium campestre Field Eryngo very rare, prob.
    [Show full text]
  • Flowering Plants Eudicots Apiales, Gentianales (Except Rubiaceae)
    Edited by K. Kubitzki Volume XV Flowering Plants Eudicots Apiales, Gentianales (except Rubiaceae) Joachim W. Kadereit · Volker Bittrich (Eds.) THE FAMILIES AND GENERA OF VASCULAR PLANTS Edited by K. Kubitzki For further volumes see list at the end of the book and: http://www.springer.com/series/1306 The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants Edited by K. Kubitzki Flowering Plants Á Eudicots XV Apiales, Gentianales (except Rubiaceae) Volume Editors: Joachim W. Kadereit • Volker Bittrich With 85 Figures Editors Joachim W. Kadereit Volker Bittrich Johannes Gutenberg Campinas Universita¨t Mainz Brazil Mainz Germany Series Editor Prof. Dr. Klaus Kubitzki Universita¨t Hamburg Biozentrum Klein-Flottbek und Botanischer Garten 22609 Hamburg Germany The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants ISBN 978-3-319-93604-8 ISBN 978-3-319-93605-5 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93605-5 Library of Congress Control Number: 2018961008 # Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
    [Show full text]
  • Apiales, Aquifoliales, Boraginales, , Brassicales, Canellales
    Kingdom: Plantae Phylum: Tracheophyta Class: Magnoliopsida Order: Apiales, Aquifoliales, Boraginales, , Brassicales, Canellales, Caryophyllales, Celastrales, Ericales, Fabales, Garryales, Gentianales, Lamiales, Laurales, Magnoliales, Malpighiales, Malvales, Myrtales, Oxalidales, Picramniales, Piperales, Proteales, Rosales, Santalales, Sapindales, Solanales Family: Achariaceae, Anacardiaceae, Annonaceae, Apocynaceae, Aquifoliaceae, Araliaceae, Bignoniaceae, Bixaceae, Boraginaceae, Burseraceae, Calophyllaceae, Canellaceae, Cannabaceae, Capparaceae, Cardiopteridaceae, Caricaceae, Caryocaraceae, Celastraceae, Chrysobalanaceae, Clusiaceae, Combretaceae, Dichapetalaceae, Ebenaceae, Elaeocarpaceae, Emmotaceae, Erythroxylaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Fabaceae, Goupiaceae, Hernandiaceae, Humiriaceae, Hypericaceae, Icacinaceae, Ixonanthaceae, Lacistemataceae, Lamiaceae, Lauraceae, Lecythidaceae, Lepidobotryaceae, Linaceae, Loganiaceae, Lythraceae, Malpighiaceae, Malvaceae, Melastomataceae, Meliaceae, Monimiaceae, Moraceae, Myristicaceae, Myrtaceae, Nyctaginaceae, Ochnaceae, Olacaceae, Oleaceae, Opiliaceae, Pentaphylacaceae, Phyllanthaceae, Picramniaceae, Piperaceae, Polygonaceae, Primulaceae, Proteaceae, Putranjivaceae, Rhabdodendraceae, Rhamnaceae, Rhizophoraceae, Rosaceae, Rubiaceae, Rutaceae, Sabiaceae, Salicaceae, Sapindaceae, Sapotaceae, Simaroubaceae, Siparunaceae, Solanaceae, Stemonuraceae, Styracaceae, Symplocaceae, Ulmaceae, Urticaceae, Verbenaceae, Violaceae, Vochysiaceae Genus: Abarema, Acioa, Acosmium, Agonandra, Aiouea, Albizia, Alchornea,
    [Show full text]
  • Pond Plants PAGE 1
    Pond Plants PAGE 1 Please check for seasonality and availability by giving us a call, e-mailing or visiting the Nursery. Ponds create peaceful and relaxing environments that help cool the air on a hot summer’s day. A place to relax, be inspired, or to entertain family and friends. A range of plants will give you the right balance for crystal clear water, creating a habitat for a variety of creatures such as fish, frogs and even dragonflies. Your own mini ecosystem in the backyard. Water gardens can be large or small. They can be a real feature in a beautiful glazed pot, on a balcony or a versatile way of bringing inspiration and tranquility into the renter’s garden. No need to weed, mulch or compost. Apart from some seasonal maintenance and the occasional water top up, all you need to do is sit back, relax, and enjoy the peace of your own backyard water feature. N - Denotes Native Plant E - Denotes Evergreen D - Denotes Deciduous SD - Denotes Semi Deciduous Waterlilies nymphaea - Hardy – not available in winter Prefers to grow in 45cm of water or up to 1.8m deep. Will tolerate some shade for part of the day, but requires 5 hours of sun for best flowering results. Comes in apricot, pink, red, white and yellow. Dies down in winter. Lotus – Nelumbo nucifera (N) – pink - available from October to March Submerged Aquatic plants Aponogeton distachyos - Water Hawthorn – avail winter An attractive plant with white perfumed flowers and dark green strap-like floating leaves. It loves the cold & is good for winter coverage.
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny
    Outline of angiosperm phylogeny: orders, families, and representative genera with emphasis on Oregon native plants Priscilla Spears December 2013 The following listing gives an introduction to the phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants that has emerged in recent decades, and which is based on nucleic acid sequences as well as morphological and developmental data. This listing emphasizes temperate families of the Northern Hemisphere and is meant as an overview with examples of Oregon native plants. It includes many exotic genera that are grown in Oregon as ornamentals plus other plants of interest worldwide. The genera that are Oregon natives are printed in a blue font. Genera that are exotics are shown in black, however genera in blue may also contain non-native species. Names separated by a slash are alternatives or else the nomenclature is in flux. When several genera have the same common name, the names are separated by commas. The order of the family names is from the linear listing of families in the APG III report. For further information, see the references on the last page. Basal Angiosperms (ANITA grade) Amborellales Amborellaceae, sole family, the earliest branch of flowering plants, a shrub native to New Caledonia – Amborella Nymphaeales Hydatellaceae – aquatics from Australasia, previously classified as a grass Cabombaceae (water shield – Brasenia, fanwort – Cabomba) Nymphaeaceae (water lilies – Nymphaea; pond lilies – Nuphar) Austrobaileyales Schisandraceae (wild sarsaparilla, star vine – Schisandra; Japanese
    [Show full text]
  • Conducting Baseline Studies for Thane Creek
    Conducting baseline studies for Thane Creek Project report submitted to Mangrove Cell, Maharashtra & GIZ, Mumbai Office. by Sálim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History (SACON) Anaikatty (PO), Coimbatore - 641108, Tamil Nadu In collaboration with B.N. Bandodkar College of Science, Thane Conducting baseline studies for Thane Creek Project report submitted to Mangrove Cell, Maharashtra & GIZ, Mumbai Office. Project Investigator Dr. Goldin Quadros Co-Investigators Dr. P.A. Azeez, Dr. Mahendiran Mylswamy, Dr. Manchi Shirish S. In Collaboration With Prof. Dr. R.P. Athalye B.N. Bandodkar College of Science, Thane Research Team Mr. Siddhesh Bhave, Ms. Sonia Benjamin, Ms. Janice Vaz, Mr. Amol Tripathi, Mr. Prathamesh Gujarpadhaye Sálim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History (SACON) Anaikatty (PO), Coimbatore - 641108, Tamil Nadu 2016 Acknowledgement Thane creek has been an ecosystem that has held our attention since the time we have known about its flamingos. When we were given the opportunity to conduct The baseline study for Thane creek” we felt blessed to learn more about this unique ecosystem the largest creek from asia. This study was possible due to Mr. N Vasudevan, IFS, CCF, Mangrove cell, Maharashtra whose vision for the mangrove habitats in Maharashtra has furthered the cause of conservation. Hence, we thank him for giving us this opportunity to be a part of his larger goal. The present study involved interactions with a number of research institutions, educational institutions, NGO’s and community, all of whom were cooperative in sharing information and helped us. Most important was the cooperation of librarians from all the institutions who went out of their way in our literature survey.
    [Show full text]
  • Scarlet Ammannia (Ammannia Robusta) in Canada
    PROPOSED Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series Adopted under Section 44 of SARA Recovery Strategy for the Scarlet Ammannia (Ammannia robusta) in Canada Scarlet Ammannia 2014 Recommended citation: Environment Canada. 2014. Recovery Strategy for the Scarlet Ammannia (Ammannia robusta) in Canada [Proposed]. Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series. Environment Canada, Ottawa. XXI pp. + Appendix. For copies of the recovery strategy, or for additional information on species at risk, including the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) Status Reports, residence descriptions, action plans, and other related recovery documents, please visit the Species at Risk (SAR) Public Registry (www.sararegistry.gc.ca). Cover illustration: © Emmet J. Judziewicz Également disponible en français sous le titre « Programme de rétablissement de l’ammannie robuste (Ammannia robusta) au Canada [Proposition] » © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of the Environment, 2014. All rights reserved. ISBN Catalogue no. Content (excluding the illustrations) may be used without permission, with appropriate credit to the source. RECOVERY STRATEGY FOR THE SCARLET AMMANNIA (Ammannia robusta) IN CANADA 2014 Under the Accord for the Protection of Species at Risk (1996), the federal, provincial, and territorial governments agreed to work together on legislation, programs, and policies to protect wildlife species at risk throughout Canada. In the spirit of cooperation of the Accord, the Government of British Columbia has given permission to the Government of Canada to adopt the “Recovery Strategy for the scarlet ammannia (Ammannia robusta) in British Columbia and Ontario” (Part 2) under Section 44 of the Species at Risk Act (SARA).
    [Show full text]
  • Alberta Wetland Classification System – June 1, 2015
    Alberta Wetland Classification System June 1, 2015 ISBN 978-1-4601-2257-0 (Print) ISBN: 978-1-4601-2258-7 (PDF) Title: Alberta Wetland Classification System Guide Number: ESRD, Water Conservation, 2015, No. 3 Program Name: Water Policy Branch Effective Date: June 1, 2015 This document was updated on: April 13, 2015 Citation: Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource Development (ESRD). 2015. Alberta Wetland Classification System. Water Policy Branch, Policy and Planning Division, Edmonton, AB. Any comments, questions, or suggestions regarding the content of this document may be directed to: Water Policy Branch Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource Development 7th Floor, Oxbridge Place 9820 – 106th Street Edmonton, Alberta T5K 2J6 Phone: 780-644-4959 Email: [email protected] Additional copies of this document may be obtained by contacting: Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource Development Information Centre Main Floor, Great West Life Building 9920 108 Street Edmonton Alberta Canada T5K 2M4 Call Toll Free Alberta: 310-ESRD (3773) Toll Free: 1-877-944-0313 Fax: 780-427-4407 Email: [email protected] Website: http://esrd.alberta.ca Alberta Wetland Classification System Contributors: Matthew Wilson Environment and Sustainable Resource Development Thorsten Hebben Environment and Sustainable Resource Development Danielle Cobbaert Alberta Energy Regulator Linda Halsey Stantec Linda Kershaw Arctic and Alpine Environmental Consulting Nick Decarlo Stantec Environment and Sustainable Resource Development would also
    [Show full text]
  • Insects of Macquarie Island. Introduction1
    Pacific Insects 4 (4) : 905-915 December, 15, 1962 INSECTS OF MACQUARIE ISLAND. INTRODUCTION1 By J. Linsley Gressitt BISHOP MUSEUM, HONOLULU Abstract: Collections of land arthropods were made on Macquarie Island by J. L. Gres­ sitt and J. H. Calaby, 4-10 December 1960, and by Keith Watson, December 1960-Decem- ber 1961. This paper is a brief discussion of the geography and environment of Macquarie, introductory to the systematic papers describing the fauna. Watson, of the Australian Na­ tional Antarctic Research Expeditions, will later publish his general ecological studies, when the species are all identified. INTRODUCTION This paper is a brief description of the geography and environment of Macquarie Is­ land, as related to land arthropods. It is presented by way of introduction to the series of reports by various specialists on the land arthropod fauna of the island. The bulk of these reports immediately follow this article. (One Macquarie mite is discussed in the third of the preceding articles by Wallwork on Antarctic mites, and another is mentioned in his second article.) Others will appear in later issues, when they are completed. After publication of the bulk of these taxonomic reports, Keith Watson will publish his general report on the land arthropod fauna of Macquarie, incorporating his ecological studies on the fauna. Through the kindness of Mr. P. G. Law, Director of the Antarctic Division, Australian Department of External Affairs, I was permitted to join the Australian National Antarctic Research Expedition for the annual resupply trip to Macquarie Island in early December 1960. The operation, supported by the chartered Danish ice-breaker Magga Dan, was car­ ried on at Macquarie from 4th to lOth December.
    [Show full text]