DOCSLIB.ORG

Flora and Vegetation Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Flora and Vegetation Assessment FLORA AND VEGETATION ASSESSMENT WOODIE WOODIE MINESITE EXPANSION Prepared By Prepared For MBS Environmental December 2019 DOCUMENT STATUS DOCUMENT REFERENCE: MBS1902/72/19 VERSION TYPE AUTHOR/S REVIEWER/S DATE DISTRIBUTED V1 Internal review L Rowles E Chetwin V2 Draft for client L Rowles/E Chetwin E Mattiske 1/11/2019 FINAL Final report L Rowles E Mattiske 11/12/2019 (ACN 063 507 175, ABN 39 063 507 175) PO Box 437 Kalamunda WA 6926 Phone: +61 8 9257 1625 Email: [email protected] COPYRIGHT AND DISCLAIMER Copyright The information contained in this report is the property of Mattiske Consulting Pty Ltd. The use or copying of the whole or any part of this report without the written permission of Mattiske Consulting Pty Ltd is not permitted. Disclaimer This report has been prepared on behalf of and for the exclusive use of MBS Environmental, and is subject to and issued in accordance with the agreement between MBS Environmental and Mattiske Consulting Pty Ltd. This report is based on the scope of services defined by MBS Environmental, the budgetary and time constraints imposed by MBS Environmental, and the methods consistent with the preceding. Mattiske Consulting Pty Ltd has utilised information and data supplied by MBS Environmental (and its agents), and sourced from government databases, literature, departments and agencies in the preparation of this report. Mattiske Consulting Pty Ltd has compiled this report on the basis that any supplied or sourced information and data was accurate at the time of publication. Mattiske Consulting Pty Ltd accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for the use of, or reliance upon, the whole or any part of this report by any third party. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................ 1 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 3 1.1 Location and Scope of Proposal ........................................................................................... 3 1.2 Environmental Legislation and Guideline .............................................................................. 3 1.3 Objectives ......................................................................................................................... 4 2. METHODS ...................................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Desktop Assessment .......................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Field Survey ...................................................................................................................... 6 2.3 Survey Timing ................................................................................................................... 7 2.4 Analysis of Quadrat Data .................................................................................................... 7 2.5 Vegetation Descriptions ...................................................................................................... 7 2.6 Survey Limitations ............................................................................................................. 8 3. DESKTOP ASSESSMENT RESULTS & DISCUSSION .................................................................... 10 3.1 Climate ........................................................................................................................... 10 3.2 Geology .......................................................................................................................... 10 3.3 Landforms ....................................................................................................................... 11 3.4 Soil Landscapes ............................................................................................................... 11 3.5 Beard’s Vegetation Mapping .............................................................................................. 11 3.6 IBRA Biogeographical Subregions ...................................................................................... 11 3.7 Land systems .................................................................................................................. 12 3.8 Pre-European Vegetation .................................................................................................. 13 3.9 Flora ............................................................................................................................... 17 3.9.1 Threatened and Priority Flora ........................................................................................... 17 3.9.2 Introduced (Exotic) Flora ................................................................................................. 17 3.10 Vegetation Communities ................................................................................................... 18 3.11 Threatened and Priority Ecological Communities ................................................................. 19 3.12 World Heritage Areas and Ramsar Wetlands ....................................................................... 19 3.13 National Heritage Properties ............................................................................................. 19 3.14 National Parks and Reserves ............................................................................................. 19 4. FIELD SURVEY - RESULTS .......................................................................................................... 21 4.1 Flora ............................................................................................................................... 21 4.2 Threatened and Priority Flora ............................................................................................ 22 4.3 Introduced (Weed) Species and Declared Pest (Plant) Organisms ......................................... 22 4.4 Vegetation ....................................................................................................................... 22 4.4.1 Statistical Analysis ............................................................................................................ 22 4.4.2 Vegetation Communities ................................................................................................... 25 4.5 Threatened and Priority Ecological Communities ................................................................. 34 4.6 Vegetation Condition ........................................................................................................ 34 5. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS.............................................................................................. 36 5.1 Flora Species ................................................................................................................... 36 5.2 Priority Flora Species ........................................................................................................ 36 5.3 Introduced Flora Species................................................................................................... 36 5.4 Vegetation Communities ................................................................................................... 36 5.5 Vegetation Condition ........................................................................................................ 37 6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................ 37 7. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................... 38 8. PERSONNEL ................................................................................................................................ 38 9. REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................... 39 TABLES 1 Potential limitations affecting survey conclusions 2: Land systems intersecting the Woodie Woodie Mine Expansion Areas, 2019 3: Pre-European Vegetation intersecting the Woodie Woodie Mine Expansion Areas, 2019 4: Vegetation community descriptions for the Woodie Woodie Mine Expansion Areas, 2019 Area coverage of vegetation communities within the Woodie Woodie Mine Expansion Areas, 5: 2019 Vegetation condition (percentage) of vegetation communities mapped within the Woodie 6: Woodie Mine Expansion Areas, 2019 FIGURES 1: Locality of the Woodie Woodie Mine Expansion Areas 2: Survey sites and track logs within the Woodie Woodie Mine Expansion Areas, 2019 3: Rainfall and temperature data for the Woodie Woodie Mine Expansion Areas, 2018-19 4: Land Systems for the Woodie Woodie Mine Expansion Areas 5: Pre-European Vegetation for the Woodie Woodie Mine Expansion Areas 6: Previous vegetation mapping for the greater Woodie Woodie Mine area, 2018 7: Species accumulation curve for the Woodie Woodie Mine Expansion Areas, 2019 8: Dendrogram of Bray-Curtis similarity matrix transformed foliage cover data for quadrats within the WWME survey areas, 2019 9.1-9.6: Vegetation mapping for the Woodie Woodie Mine Expansion Areas, 2019 10: Vegetation Condition mapping for the Woodie Woodie Mine Expansion Areas, 2019 APPENDICES A1: Threatened and priority flora and fauna definitions A2: Threatened and priority ecological community definitions A3: Categories and control measures of declared
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ngaanyatjarra Central Ranges Indigenous Protected Area
    PLAN OF MANAGEMENT for the NGAANYATJARRA LANDS INDIGENOUS PROTECTED AREA Ngaanyatjarra Council Land Management Unit August 2002 PLAN OF MANAGEMENT for the Ngaanyatjarra Lands Indigenous Protected Area Prepared by: Keith Noble People & Ecology on behalf of the: Ngaanyatjarra Land Management Unit August 2002 i Table of Contents Notes on Yarnangu Orthography .................................................................................................................................. iv Acknowledgements........................................................................................................................................................ v Cover photos .................................................................................................................................................................. v Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................................................. v Summary.................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Background ...............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Soil and Land Suitability Assessment for Irrigated Agriculture in the Wildman River Area, Northern Territory February 2016
    Agricultural Land Suitability Series – Report 2 DLRM Technical Report 2/2016D Soil and Land Suitability Assessment for Irrigated Agriculture in the Wildman River area, Northern Territory February 2016 Rangelands Division Department of Land Resource Management PO Box 496 Palmerston NT 0831 Easey D, Brocklehurst P, and Carnavas M © Northern Territory of Australia, 2016 ISBN 9781743500941 www.lrm.nt.gov.au Department of Land Resource Management Land Assessment Branch PO Box 496 Palmerston NT 0831 © Northern Territory of Australia, 2016 ISBN 9781743500859 To reference this report: Easey D, Brocklehurst P & Carnavas M (2016) Agricultural Land Suitability Series, Report 2. Soil and Land Suitability Assessment for Irrigated Agriculture in the Wildman River area, Northern Territory. Technical Report 2/2016D Department of Land Resource Management, Darwin, NT. The map series accompanying this report can be downloaded from the NR Maps website. http://nrmaps.nt.gov.au/ Disclaimer: All care and diligence has been exercised in the collection, analysis and interpretation of the data and recommendations presented in this report. The works undertaken have been completed in a skilled, professional manner, according to recommended and accepted Australian practices and standards. Specific circumstances and research findings after the date of publication may influence the accuracy of the data and recommendations within this report. While the findings presented in this report are based on information that the Department of Land Resource Management, NTG considers reliable unless stated otherwise, the accuracy and completeness of source information cannot be guaranteed. The information compiled in this report addresses specifically identified objectives of the project stake- holders, and as such may not address the needs of third parties using the report for their own purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Acacia Synchronicia Maslin
    WATTLE Acacias of Australia Acacia synchronicia Maslin Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com B.R. Maslin Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: Australian Plant Image Index Image courtesy of Northern Territory Herbarium Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com (dig.15818). B.R. Maslin ANBG © M. Fagg, 2009 Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com B.R. Maslin B.R. Maslin B.R. Maslin Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com B.R. Maslin Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Kym Brennan Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com B.R. Maslin B.R. Maslin B.R. Maslin Source: Australian Plant Image Index (dig.15819). ANBG © M. Fagg, 2009 Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com J.
    [Show full text]
  • Onslow Metals Turtle and Range Deposits Level 1 Flora Survey June
    Onslow Metals Turtle and Range Deposits Level 1 Flora Survey June 2011 Dr. Belinda Newman (Author) Newman Environmental 130 Riverview Ave South Guildford WA, 6055 Ph: 0433768578 ABN: 85 437 176 819 Email: [email protected] This page has been left intentionally blank Executive Summary Onslow Metals propose to conduct drilling and exploration activities and activate a quarry over the Turtle and Range tenements, approximately 80km south of Onslow. A reconnaissance survey and level one flora report were prepared for the site. The site has had some historic drilling and exploration activities, resulting in localised vegetation disturbance. Turtle Deposit tenement is 50ha in size and Range tenement is 120ha in size. The area that Onslow Metals will potentially disturb is approximately 15ha. Searches of the DEC databases revealed that two Priority flora were known to occur within the vicinity of the site. Neither of these species was observed during the reconnaissance survey. Following a review of other surveys within the area, and the habitat preferences of these two species, it was deemed that these species do not occur on the Onslow Metals tenements. The vegetation at the site ranges in condition from Good to Poor condition. Vegetation which is in Good condition has the potential to deteriorate over time with two introduced species recorded for the site having a „high‟ rating as an environmental weed. The site does not contain any Threatened or Priority Ecological Communities and the vegetation units are well represented in a regional context. As there are no Threatened or Priority flora, the vegetation and flora of the site has no conservation significance.
    [Show full text]
  • Acacia Glaucocaesia Domin
    WATTLE Acacias of Australia Acacia glaucocaesia Domin Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com B.R. Maslin B.R. Maslin B.R. Maslin B.R. Maslin Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com B.R. Maslin J. Maslin B.R. Maslin Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com B.R. Maslin Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com See illustration. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Acacia glaucocaesia occurrence map. Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com O ccurrence map generated via Atlas of Living B.R. Maslin Australia (https://w w w .ala.org.au). Family Fabaceae Distribution Known only from a few scattered localities in the western part of the Pilbara region mainly between the Fortescue and De Grey Rivers, including North Turtle Is., north- western W.A. A sterile specimen with persistent, spinose stipules, collected from a regrowth population at Salt Ck, between Port Hedland and Broome (B.R.Maslin 4874, PERTH), is tentatively referred to this species: see B.R.Maslin, Nuytsia 8: 298 (1992), for discussion.
    [Show full text]
  • Robe River Limited 1.3
    Clearing Permit Decision Report 1. Application details 1.1. Permit application details Permit application No.: 8319/1 Permit type: Purpose Permit 1.2. Proponent details Proponent’s name: Robe River Limited 1.3. Property details Property: Iron Ore (Robe River) Agreement Act 1964, Mineral Lease 248SA (AML 70/248) Local Government Area: Shire of Ashburton Colloquial name: Puluru 1.4. Application Clearing Area (ha) No. Trees Method of Clearing For the purpose of: 110 Mechanical Removal Mineral Exploration, Hydrogeological Investigations and Associated Activities. 1.5. Decision on application Decision on Permit Application: Grant Decision Date: 18 April 2019 2. Site Information 2.1. Existing environment and information 2.1.1. Description of the native vegetation under application Vegetation Description The vegetation of the application area is broadly mapped as Beard vegetation association 82: Hummock grassland, low tree steppe; Snappy Gum (Eucalyptus leucophloia) over Triodia wiseana (GIS Database). A flora and vegetation survey was conducted over the application area by Biota Environmental Services during July 2018. The following vegetation units were recorded within the application area (Biota, 2018): Vegetation of River Systems and Drainages R1: EcEvMaAtrCYPvCYa Eucalyptus camaldulensis subsp. refulgens, E. victrix, Melaleuca argentea closed forest over Acacia trachycarpa tall open shrubland over Cyperus vaginatus open sedgeland and Cymbopogon ambiguus scattered tussock grasses. R2: EcEvMgAtrCYPvEUaTHtERItCYa Eucalyptus camaldulensis subsp. refulgens, E. victrix woodland over Melaleuca glomerata, Acacia trachycarpa tall shrubland over Cyperus vaginatus, very open sedgeland and Eulalia aurea, Themeda triandra, Eriachne tenuiculmis, Cymbopogon ambiguus very open tussock grassland. R3: AtrERIt Acacia trachycarpa tall shrubland over Eriachne tenuiculmis scattered tussock grasses. Vegetation of Gorges and Gullies G1: CfPHbTHt Corymbia ferriticola low woodland over Phyllanthus baccatus scattered tall shrubs over Themeda triandra very open tussock grassland.
    [Show full text]
  • Mcphee Creek Flora and Vegetation Survey 227 a T L a S I R O N
    SITE DETAILS MC20Q24 Staff JLT Date 18/04/2020 Season E Revisit Type Q 50 m x 50 m Location MGA Zone 51 202985 mE 7609989 mN Lat. -21.5884 Long. 120.1316 Habitat Flat Aspect N/A Slope N/A Soil Type Brown clay loam Rock Type Ironstone / BIF Loose Rock 10-20 % cover; 2-6 mm in size Litter <1 % cover ; <1 cm in depth Bare ground 30 % cover Weeds 0 % cover Vegetation M+ ^Acacia monticola,^Hakea lorea subsp. lorea\^shrub\4\c;G ^Triodia epactia,^Eriachne lanata\^hummock grass,tussock grass\1\c Veg. Condition Very Good Disturbance Fire Age >5 years Notes Disturbed by old drill pads Species WA Cons. Height (m) Cover (%) Count Acacia acradenia P 1.3 <1 Acacia bivenosa P .2 <1 Acacia monticola P 2.4 22 Corchorus parviflorus P .35 <1 Dampiera candicans P .4 <1 SITE DETAILS Eriachne lanata P .3 65 Evolvulus alsinoides var. villosicalyx P .1 <1 Goodenia stobbsiana P .2 0.2 Grevillea wickhamii P 1.8 0.2 Hakea lorea subsp. lorea P 3 1 Hibiscus coatesii P .4 <1 Indigofera monophylla P .4 <1 Ptilotus calostachyus P .4 <1 Sida sp. Pilbara (A.A. Mitchell PRP 1543) P .3 <1 Triodia epactia P .4 8 Triumfetta maconochieana P .4 <1 SITE DETAILS MC20Q25 Staff JLT Date 12/04/2020 Season E Revisit Type Q 50 m x 50 m Location MGA Zone 51 195876 mE 7607806 mN Lat. -21.6069 Long. 120.0626 Habitat Flat Aspect N/A Slope N/A Soil Type Black haemotite over pale brown silt Rock Type Haemotite Loose Rock 10-20 % cover; 2-6 mm in size Litter <1 % cover ; <1 cm in depth Bare ground 50 % cover Weeds 0 % cover Vegetation U ^Corymbia hamersleyana\^tree\6\bi;M ^Acacia inaequilatera\^shrub\4\bi;G+ ^Triodia epactia\^hummock grass\1\c Veg.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Gulf, Queensland
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Acacia Monticola X Trachycarpa
    WATTLE Acacias of Australia Acacia monticola J.M.Black x Acacia trachycarpa E.Pritz. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com See illustration. Family Fabaceae Distribution Occurs in the Pilbara region of north-western W.A. where it is known from a single collection along the railway access rd between Tom Price and Karratha. Description Resinous shrub to 4 m high. Bark red ‘Minni Ritchi’. Branchlets hirtellous. Stipules persistent, triangular, c. 1 mm long, scarious, brown. Phyllodes linear-oblanceolate, narrowed to a fine, brown, subulate, innocuous point 1–1.5 mm long, upper margin clearly broader than lower margin, 4–8 cm long, 3–4 mm wide, not rigid, ±straight, sparsely hirtellous; longitudinal nerves numerous with central one most evident, minor nerves often longitudinally anastomosing. Inflorescences simple; peduncles 15–30 mm long, hirtellous; spikes 10–15 mm long. Flowers 5-merous; calyx dissected for about ½ its length into oblong lobes. Pods (immature) narrowly oblong, flat, 2–6 cm long, c. 8 mm wide, mostly straight, sometimes twisted in the longitudinal plane, obscurely reticulate, with dense, short, soft, straight, white hairs; marginal nerves thickened. Seeds (immature) oblique. Habitat Grows in skeletal soil along a drainage line among low rocky hills. Specimens W.A.: between Tom Price and Karratha along railway access track, E.Thoma 853 (PERTH). Notes The putative hybrid status of this entity is suggested by field observations and from a critical examination of herbarium material. It is intermediate between the two parents in phyllode width. Another putative hybrid between A.
    [Show full text]
  • Clearing Permit Decision Report
    Clearing Permit Decision Report 1. Application details 1.1. Permit application details Permit application No.: 8399/1 Permit type: Purpose Permit 1.2. Proponent details Proponent’s name: EII Gas Transmission Service WA (Operations) Pty Ltd 1.3. Property details Property: Pipeline Licence PL60 Pipeline Licence PL63 Local Government Area: Shire of East Pilbara Town of Port Hedland Colloquial name: Telfer Gas Pipeline 1.4. Application Clearing Area (ha) No. Trees Method of Clearing For the purpose of: 265.449 Mechanical Removal Gas Pipeline Maintenance 1.5. Decision on application Decision on Permit Application: Grant Decision Date: 12 September 2019 2. Site Information 2.1. Existing environment and information 2.1.1. Description of the native vegetation under application Vegetation Description The vegetation of the application area is broadly mapped as the following Beard vegetation associations: 41: Shrublands; teatree scrub; 93: Hummock grasslands, shrub steppe; kanji over soft spinifex; 101: Hummock grasslands, shrub steppe; Acacia pachycarpa over soft spinifex; 117: Hummock grasslands, grass steppe; soft spinifex; 134: Mosaic: Hummock grasslands, open low tree steppe; desert bloodwood and feathertop spinifex on sandhills / Hummock grasslands, shrub steppe; mixed shrubs over spinifex between sandhills; 157: Hummock grasslands, grass steppe; hard spinifex, Triodia wiseana ; 171: Hummock grasslands, low tree steppe; snappy gum over soft spinifex and Triodia brizioides ; 173: Hummock grasslands, shrub steppe; kanji over soft spinifex and Triodia wiseana on basalt; 589: Mosaic: Short bunch grassland - savanna / grass plain (Pilbara) / Hummock grasslands, grass steppe; soft spinifex; 619: Medium woodland; river gum ( Eucalyptus camaldulensis ); and 647: Hummock grasslands, dwarf-shrub steppe; Acacia translucens over soft spinifex (GIS Database).
    [Show full text]
  • Great Northern Highway Intersection Reconnaissance Flora and Fauna Survey for the Wonmunna Iron Ore Project Prepared for Wonmunna Iron Ore Pty Ltd
    Great Northern Highway Intersection reconnaissance flora and fauna survey for the Wonmunna Iron Ore Project Prepared for Wonmunna Iron Ore Pty Ltd Great Northern Highway Intersection reconnaissance flora and fauna survey for the Wonmunna Iron Ore Project Prepared for Wonmunna Iron Ore Pty Ltd November 2020 Final 1 Great Northern Highway Intersection reconnaissance flora and fauna survey for the Wonmunna Iron Ore Project Prepared for Wonmunna Iron Ore Pty Ltd Great Northern Highway Intersection reconnaissance flora and fauna survey for the Wonmunna Iron Ore Project Prepared for Wonmunna Iron Ore Pty Ltd Version history Author/s Reviewer/s Version Version Date Submitted to number submitted S.Findlay, J.Clark and G.Wells Draft for client 0.1 27-Nov-20 D.Temple-Smith C.Woods and comments M.Clunies-Ross J.Clark G.Wells Final, client 1.0 04-Dec-20 D.Temple-Smith comments addressed © Phoenix Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd 2020 The use of this report is solely for the client for the purpose in which it was prepared. Phoenix Environmental Sciences accepts no responsibility for use beyond this purpose. All rights are reserved and no part of this report may be reproduced or copied in any form without the written permission of Phoenix Environmental Sciences or the client. Phoenix Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd 2/3 King Edward Road OSBORNE PARK WA 6017 P: 08 6323 5410 E: [email protected] Project code: 1377-WON-MRL-BOT; 1378-WON-MRL-VER i Great Northern Highway Intersection reconnaissance flora and fauna survey for the Wonmunna Iron Ore Project Prepared for Wonmunna Iron Ore Pty Ltd EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Wonmunna Iron Ore Project (the Project)is located approximately 74 km WNW of the town of Newman, Western Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Territory NT Page 1 of 204 21-Jan-11 Species List for NRM Region Northern Territory, Northern Territory
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]