DOCSLIB.ORG

Airport Capacity and TSAM

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Airport Capacity and TSAM A Modeling Framework to Estimate Airport Runway Capacity in the National Airspace System Yueh-Ting Chen Thesis submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science In Civil and Environmental Engineering Committee Members: Dr. Antonio Trani Dr. Hojong Baik Dr. Hesham Rakha December 12, 2006 Blacksburg, VA Keywords: airport runway capacity, Airfield Capacity Model Copyright 2006, Yueh-Ting Chen A Modeling Framework to Estimate Airport Runway Capacity in the National Airspace System Yueh-Ting Chen Abstract The objective of this study is to estimate the airport capacity in the National Airspace System (NAS). Previous studies have focused on the airport capacity of large commercial airports. This research study estimates the runway capacity for more than two thousand airports in the NAS in order to understand future tradeoffs between air transportation demand and supply. The study presented in this report includes capacity estimates for general aviation and commercial airports. To estimate airport runway capacity, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Airfield Capacity Model (ACM) is used to assess the capacity at all candidate airports in a target airport set. This set includes all airports with potential Very Light Jet (VLJ) operations. The result of the study provides a broad view about the airport capacity in the future air transportation system, and could help decision makers with a modeling framework to identify congestion patterns in the system. Moreover, airport capacity is an important limiting factor in the growth of air transportation demand. The main motivation in our analyis is to include airport capacity constraints in forecasts of air transportation demand. The framework described in this report has been integrated into the Transportation Systems Analysis Model (TSAM). TSAM is a comprehensive intercity and multimode transportation planning tool to predict future air transportation demand. Acknowledgements I would like to thank Dr.Trani for the opportunity to work with him in the Air Transportation Systems Laboratory. His wisdom and patience guide me throughout this study, and the past two years are definitely one of the most invaluable learning experiences that I have ever had. I would also like to thank Dr.Baik, Dr.Rakha, Mr.Swingle and Nick for all of their advices and help throughout this research project, especially the great work of TSAM integration by Nick. Besides, I am really glad to have Senanu, Anand, Sohn, Jeff, Yue, and Nola as my colleagues. Fang-Yi, Chu-Yun, Chih- Yang, and Wen-Chun, I would like to thank all your encouragements. Last but not least, I have to thank the support from my parents and brother throughout my study in the Virginia Tech. Thank your all! Table of Contents Chapter 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 1 Section 1.1 Objectives ...................................................................................................... 2 Section 1.2 Scope of Study ............................................................................................... 2 Section 1.3 Characteristics of Airport Capacity ............................................................... 3 Section 1.4 Summary........................................................................................................ 5 Chapter 2 Literature Review..................................................................................................... 6 Section 2.1 Airport Capacity Analysis Methodologies..................................................... 6 Section 2.2 Review of Airport Capacity Models.............................................................. 7 Section 2.3 Review of Other Airport Capacity Research ............................................... 16 Section 2.4 Summary...................................................................................................... 17 Chapter 3 Methodology .......................................................................................................... 18 Section 3.1 Introduction.................................................................................................. 18 Section 3.2 Methodology to Create Target Airport Set .................................................. 20 Section 3.2.1 Overview and Scope of Target Airport Set............................................... 20 Section 3.2.2 Overview and Scope of FAA Airport Master Record .............................. 20 Section 3.2.3 Procedure to Create Target Airport Set .................................................... 21 Section 3.3 Methodology to Estimate Aircraft Mix........................................................ 21 Section 3.3.1 Overview of Aircraft Mix ......................................................................... 21 Section 3.3.2 Overview and Scope of Aircraft Mix Data Sources ................................. 22 Section 3.3.3 Overview and Scope of BTS T-100 Data ................................................. 24 Section 3.3.4 Procedure to Calculate Commercial Operations Using BTS T-100 Air Carrier Statistics.............................................................................................................. 25 Section 3.3.5 Overview and Scope of Based Aircraft Data............................................ 27 Section 3.3.6 Procedure to Estimate General Aviation Operations Using Based Aircraft Data................................................................................................................................. 28 Section 3.3.7 Procedure to Calculate Aircraft Mix......................................................... 31 Section 3.4 Airfield Capacity Model Analysis ............................................................... 31 Section 3.4.1 Overview and Scope of ACM................................................................... 31 Section 3.4.2 Assumptions about various ACM Parameters .......................................... 35 Section 3.4.3 Procedure to Run ACM and Output ......................................................... 38 Section 3.4.4 Applying ACM to Other Airports in the Target Airport Set .................... 40 Section 3.5 Supplementary Runway Capacity Analysis Data ........................................ 40 Chapter 4 Results and Verification......................................................................................... 42 Section 4.1 Composition of the Target Airport Set ........................................................ 42 Section 4.2 Operations and Aircraft Mix at the Target Airport Set................................ 45 Section 4.3 Airport Capacity........................................................................................... 46 Section 4.4 Application of Future Scenarios .................................................................. 60 Section 4.5 Verification .................................................................................................. 62 Chapter 5 Conclusion.............................................................................................................. 68 Section 5.1 Summary of Objectives................................................................................ 68 Section 5.2 Summary of Results..................................................................................... 68 i Section 5.3 Recommendations and Future Research...................................................... 69 References............................................................................................................................... 71 Appendix A Acronyms ........................................................................................................... 75 Appendix B Runway Surface Types and Conditions Accepted ............................................. 76 Appendix C T-100 Segment Data Fields List and Description .............................................. 77 Appendix D Airfield Capacity Model Output File Example.................................................. 79 Appendix E-1 Matlab Program File for Single Runway Airport............................................ 83 Appendix E-2 Matlab Program File for Multi-Runway Airport-Runway Classification....... 92 Appendix E-3 Matlab Program File for Multi-Runway Airport-Parser ............................... 108 Appendix E-4 Matlab Program File for Multi-Runway Airport-Result Collection ............. 130 Appendix E-5 Matlab Program File for Multi-Runway Airport-Result Comparison........... 135 Appendix F List of the Target Airports ................................................................................ 139 Appendix G Aircraft Type and Weight Class List................................................................ 210 ii List of Figures Figure 1: Problem Situation...................................................................................................... 9 Figure 2: Final Approach and Landing Processes; Arrival-Only Scenario; Vi < Vj.............. 11 Figure 3: Final Approach and Landing Processes; Arrival-Only Scenario; Vi > Vj.............. 12 Figure 4: Final Approach and Landing Processes, Mix Operation Scenario.......................... 13 Figure 5: Flowchart of the Airport Runway Capacity Study.................................................. 19 Figure 6: Screen Capture of FAA Airport Master Record Used in the Study. ....................... 21 Figure 7:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (Asos) Implementation Plan
    AUTOMATED SURFACE OBSERVING SYSTEM (ASOS) IMPLEMENTATION PLAN VAISALA CEILOMETER - CL31 November 14, 2008 U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service / Office of Operational Systems/Observing Systems Branch National Weather Service / Office of Science and Technology/Development Branch Table of Contents Section Page Executive Summary............................................................................ iii 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................... 1 1.1 Background.......................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose................................................................................. 2 1.3 Scope.................................................................................... 2 1.4 Applicable Documents......................................................... 2 1.5 Points of Contact.................................................................. 4 2.0 Pre-Operational Implementation Activities ............................ 6 3.0 Operational Implementation Planning Activities ................... 6 3.1 Planning/Decision Activities ............................................... 7 3.2 Logistic Support Activities .................................................. 11 3.3 Configuration Management (CM) Activities....................... 12 3.4 Operational Support Activities ............................................ 12 4.0 Operational Implementation (OI) Activities .........................
    [Show full text]
  • 79952 Federal Register / Vol
    79952 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 244 / Tuesday, December 21, 2010 / Rules and Regulations Unsafe Condition DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, (d) This AD was prompted by an accident Washington 98057–3356; telephone and the subsequent discovery of cracks in the Federal Aviation Administration (425) 227–1137; fax (425) 227–1149. main rotor blade (blade) spars. We are issuing SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 14 CFR Part 39 this AD to prevent blade failure and Discussion subsequent loss of control of the helicopter. [Docket No. FAA–2009–0864; Directorate We issued a supplemental notice of Compliance Identifier 2008–NM–202–AD; Amendment 39–16544; AD 2010–26–05] proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend (e) Before further flight, unless already 14 CFR part 39 to include an AD that done: RIN 2120–AA64 would apply to the specified products. (1) Revise the Limitations section of the That supplemental NPRM was Airworthiness Directives; DASSAULT Instructions for Continued Airworthiness by published in the Federal Register on AVIATION Model Falcon 10 Airplanes; establishing a life limit of 8,000 hours time- July 27, 2010 (75 FR 43878). That Model FAN JET FALCON, FAN JET in-service (TIS) for each blade set Remove supplemental NPRM proposed to FALCON SERIES C, D, E, F, and G each blade set with 8,000 or more hours TIS. correct an unsafe condition for the Airplanes; Model MYSTERE-FALCON (2) Replace each specified serial-numbered specified products. The MCAI states: 200 Airplanes; Model MYSTERE- blade set with an airworthy blade set in During maintenance on one aircraft, it was accordance with the following table: FALCON 20–C5, 20–D5, 20–E5, and 20– F5 Airplanes; Model FALCON 2000 and discovered that the overpressure capsules were broken on both pressurization valves.
    [Show full text]
  • Dekalb County Airport Business Plan GWB
    2016 DeKalb County Airport Business Plan GWB DeKalb County Airport Authority 6/17/2016 DeKalb County Airport Business Plan 2016 Airport Authority Board Brad Hartz – President George Wappes – Vice President John Chalmers – Secretary John Harris – Member Jess Myers – Member Airport Authority Staff Russ Couchman – Airport Manager Jason Hoit – Assistant Manager Sebastian Baumgardner - Maintenance Gene Powell - Maintenance Fixed Base Operator/Century Aviaiton Lara Gaerte - Owner Tony Gaerte - Owner Nick Diehl Larry Peters Steve McMurray DCAA Business Plan 1 DeKalb County Airport Business Plan 2016 Table of Contents Section Page Executive Summary….…………………………………………………………….……….………………4 Business Plan Basis…………………………..………………………………………………………………8 Background………………………………………………………………………………………………….….9 Goals, Objectives and Action Plans…………………………………………………………………20 Appendices……………………………………………………………………………………………………. Appendix A – Additional Goals, Objectives and Action Plans Appendix B – Business Plan Survey Appendix C – Business Plan Survey Results Appendix D – Indiana Airports Economic Impact Study Executive Summary Appendix E – FAA Asset Study, Regional Airports Excerpt Appendix F – DCAA 2016-2021 Capital Improvement Plan/Funding Summary Appendix G – Future Airport Layout Plan Drawing DCAA Business Plan 2 DeKalb County Airport Business Plan 2016 Page Intentionally Left Blank DCAA Business Plan 3 DeKalb County Airport Business Plan 2016 Executive Summary The DeKalb County Airport (GWB) is a Regional General Aviation Airport that is a significant part of the economic development activity, commerce and transportation in Northeast Indiana. The Airport, in it’s over half a century of operation, has developed into an all-season, all-weather corporate-class facility which successfully competes with its peers, regardless of size. The purpose of this plan is to move the DeKalb County Airport Authority (DCAA) strategically into a more positive, community focused entity while relying less on tax revenues, over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Force Enlisted Personnel Policy 1907-1956
    FOUNDATION of the FORCE Air Force Enlisted Personnel Policy 1907-1956 Mark R. Grandstaff DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A Approved for Public Release Distribution Unlimited AIR PROGRAM 1997 20050429 034 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Grandstaff, Mark R. Foundation of the Force: Air Force enlisted personnel policy, 1907-1956 / Mark R. Grandstaff. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. United States. Air Force-Non-commissioned officers-History. 2. United States. Air Force-Personnel management-History. I. Title. UG823.G75 1996 96-33468 358.4'1338'0973-DC20 CIP For sale by the U.S. Government Printing Office Superintendent of Documents, Mail Stop: SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-9328 ISBN 0-16-049041-3 REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGEFomApve OMB No. 0704-0188 The public reporting burden for this collection of information Is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of Information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. 1. REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YYYY) 2.
    [Show full text]
  • CARES ACT GRANT AMOUNTS to AIRPORTS (Pursuant to Paragraphs 2-4) Detailed Listing by State, City and Airport
    CARES ACT GRANT AMOUNTS TO AIRPORTS (pursuant to Paragraphs 2-4) Detailed Listing By State, City And Airport State City Airport Name LOC_ID Grand Totals AK Alaskan Consolidated Airports Multiple [individual airports listed separately] AKAP $16,855,355 AK Adak (Naval) Station/Mitchell Field Adak ADK $30,000 AK Akhiok Akhiok AKK $20,000 AK Akiachak Akiachak Z13 $30,000 AK Akiak Akiak AKI $30,000 AK Akutan Akutan 7AK $20,000 AK Akutan Akutan KQA $20,000 AK Alakanuk Alakanuk AUK $30,000 AK Allakaket Allakaket 6A8 $20,000 AK Ambler Ambler AFM $30,000 AK Anaktuvuk Pass Anaktuvuk Pass AKP $30,000 AK Anchorage Lake Hood LHD $1,053,070 AK Anchorage Merrill Field MRI $17,898,468 AK Anchorage Ted Stevens Anchorage International ANC $26,376,060 AK Anchorage (Borough) Goose Bay Z40 $1,000 AK Angoon Angoon AGN $20,000 AK Aniak Aniak ANI $1,052,884 AK Aniak (Census Subarea) Togiak TOG $20,000 AK Aniak (Census Subarea) Twin Hills A63 $20,000 AK Anvik Anvik ANV $20,000 AK Arctic Village Arctic Village ARC $20,000 AK Atka Atka AKA $20,000 AK Atmautluak Atmautluak 4A2 $30,000 AK Atqasuk Atqasuk Edward Burnell Sr Memorial ATK $20,000 AK Barrow Wiley Post-Will Rogers Memorial BRW $1,191,121 AK Barrow (County) Wainwright AWI $30,000 AK Beaver Beaver WBQ $20,000 AK Bethel Bethel BET $2,271,355 AK Bettles Bettles BTT $20,000 AK Big Lake Big Lake BGQ $30,000 AK Birch Creek Birch Creek Z91 $20,000 AK Birchwood Birchwood BCV $30,000 AK Boundary Boundary BYA $20,000 AK Brevig Mission Brevig Mission KTS $30,000 AK Bristol Bay (Borough) Aleknagik /New 5A8 $20,000 AK
    [Show full text]
  • DASSAULT AVIATION Model Falcon 10 Airplanes
    43878 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 143 / Tuesday, July 27, 2010 / Proposed Rules Applicability New Requirements of This AD: Actions Bulletin SBF100–27–092, dated April 27, (c) This AD applies to Fokker Services B.V. (h) Within 30 months after the effective 2009; and Goodrich Service Bulletin 23100– Model F.28 Mark 0100 airplanes, certificated date of this AD, do the actions specified in 27–29, dated November 14, 2008; for related in any category, all serial numbers. paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(2) of this AD information. concurrently. Accomplishing the actions of Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 21, Subject both paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(2) of this AD 2010. (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of terminates the actions required by paragraph Jeffrey E. Duven, America Code 27: Flight Controls. (g) of this AD. (1) Remove the tie-wrap, P/N MS3367–2– Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Reason 9, from the lower bolts of the horizontal Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. (e) The mandatory continuing stabilizer control unit, in accordance with the [FR Doc. 2010–18399 Filed 7–26–10; 8:45 am] airworthiness information (MCAI) states: Accomplishment Instructions of Fokker BILLING CODE 4910–13–P Two reports have been received where, Service Bulletin SBF100–27–092, dated April during inspection of the vertical stabilizer of 27, 2009. F28 Mark 0100 aeroplanes, one of the bolts (2) Remove the lower bolts, P/N 23233–1, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION that connect the horizontal stabilizer control of the horizontal stabilizer control unit and unit actuator with the dog-links was found install bolts, P/N 23233–3, in accordance Federal Aviation Administration broken (one on the nut side & one on the with the Accomplishment Instructions of Goodrich Service Bulletin 23100–27–29, head side).
    [Show full text]
  • Indiana State Aviation System Plan Airports Based Aircraft History
    Indiana State Aviation System Plan Airports Based Aircraft History Aviation Facility Associated City 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Aviation Facility Anderson Municipal Anderson 79 74 73 76 75 78 71 67 72 68 75 71 63 70 67 57 68 71 65 70 72 72 79 80 77 85 81 73 Anderson Municipal Steuben Co.-Tri State Angola 24 22 25 25 27 29 29 32 30 34 34 32 30 31 34 30 31 33 33 34 42 39 40 35 34 38 39 37 Steuben Co.-Tri State DeKalb County Auburn 30 32 38 32 35 32 29 30 34 33 47 47 45 57 51 44 48 56 65 66 64 60 66 67 63 64 67 63 DeKalb County Virgil I. Grissom Bedford 38 35 36 28 28 30 31 28 29 29 29 32 31 34 30 31 33 35 31 34 31 32 31 29 27 28 29 28 Virgil I. Grissom Monroe County Bloomington 63 68 80 82 82 86 88 77 79 80 78 94 88 87 99 99 94 100 102 103 101 101 98 105 113 108 117 111 Monroe County Brazil-Clay County Brazil 10 12 11 10 10 11 12 9 11 13 11 11 10 14 12 14 14 16 15 13 16 17 16 18 17 17 14 15 Brazil-Clay County Clinton Clinton 14 11 13 14 14 13 13 12 11 11 11 12 12 16 13 13 11 9 9 9 11 11 10 11 11 12 13 11 Clinton Columbus Municipal Columbus 75 74 69 66 68 66 67 63 71 75 75 87 82 72 84 80 81 80 76 76 70 75 73 76 78 73 67 67 Columbus Municipal Mettel Field Connersville 19 15 15 16 15 16 17 21 21 17 15 13 10 8 11 14 11 10 11 12 14 11 12 11 13 7 8 8 Mettel Field Crawfordsville Municipal Crawfordsville 27 29 29 27 28 28 29 31 32 33 32 38 36 30 30 32 27 29 31 27 27 29 33 33 31 34 31 34 Crawfordsville Municipal Delphi Municipal Delphi 15 17 16 14 8 8 12 12 14 14 14 20 20 22 23 21 21 22 25 26 31 29 27 26 25 27 26 24 Delphi Municipal Elkhart Municipal Elkhart 93 97 96 97 88 84 82 87 79 72 85 81 70 94 85 84 80 75 60 70 92 99 111 111 123 119 146 147 Elkhart Municipal Evansville Regional Evansville 84 72 73 73 64 73 75 75 79 81 79 87 79 90 85 85 89 87 79 77 68 73 64 63 63 59 55 57 Evansville Regional Ft.
    [Show full text]
  • Programs Issue 2018 Flyer Daedalian Flying Training
    Daedalus Programs Issue 2018 Flyer Daedalian Flying Training Educ & Trng Awards Veterans Day JROTC Awards Service Awards ROTC Scholarships Aviation Awards Air Camp Community Support First to fly in time of war The premier fraternity of military aviators CONTENTS December 2018, Vol. LIX No. 4 Departments Programs 5 8 30-31 Reunions Objectives & Programs Service Awards 6 10 32-33 Commander’s Perspective Meet the Program Manager Mentoring Program 7 11 34-35 Executive Director Top 10 Benefits of Membership Virtual Flight 14 12-13 36-37 New/Rejoining Daedalians A Daedalian History Lesson A Tribute to Les Leavoy 16-17 15 38-39 Book Reviews Education & Training Awards Air Camp 23 19 40-41 In Memoriam Sustained Giving JROTC Awards 42-44 20-21 Awards Community Support Extras 18 45-63 22 Advice for Future Aviators Flightline National Flight Academy 64 65 24-25 A Young Boy’s Wisdom Flight Contacts Scholarships 66-67 26-27 Eagle Wing DFT 28-29 Educate Americans THE ORDER OF DAEDALIANS was organized on March 26, 1934, by a representative group of American World War I pilots to perpetuate the spirit of pa- triotism, the love of country, and the high ideals of sacrifice which place service to nation above personal safety or position. The Order is dedicated to: insuring that America will always be preeminent in air and space—the encouragement of flight safety—fostering an esprit de corps in the military air forces—promoting the adoption of military service as a career—and aiding deserving young individuals in specialized higher education through the establishment of scholarships.
    [Show full text]
  • Forever Free Mckinney
    FOREVER FREE MCKINNEY By Christopher Rozansky Collin County Regional Airport January - February The City of McKinney’s Fourth of 2008 July celebration, Forever Free, was delayed five weeks last FOREVER FREE MCKINNEY 1, 3 summer, but if you asked 88 wounded soldiers they would not DAVE’S HANGAR 2 have wanted it any other way. More than 20 inches of summer WINGTIPS EDITOR ON TO RETIREMENT rainfall dampened the spirits of A C-130, one of two aircraft, carrying 88 veterans arrives at McKinney-Collin 2 those who were looking forward County Regional Airport and is greeted by a ceremonial arch of water courtesy to the music and fireworks display of the airport’s fire department. TEXAS AVIATION HALL OF FAME scheduled to be held at Myers 3-4 Park. Wet conditions forced planners to postpone the event until August 11, 2007, but that setback ALPINE CASPARIS turned out to be a unique opportunity for the community and Collin County Regional Airport to honor MUNICIPAL AIRPORT veterans of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. 5-7 WASP MOTTO U.S. Department of Defense staff from the Office of the Severely Injured Joint Support Operations 7-8 Center, a program created several years ago to support those injured in combat, learned of the TXDOT’S 26TH ANNUAL circumstances and contacted event planners. All involved recognized the significance of the AVIATION CONFERENCE 9-12 opportunity before them and moved quickly to integrate a fitting tribute to those who have fought for our freedom with the delayed Independence Day celebration. With a plan put together in only a couple SAVORING STEPHENVILLE 13-14 of short weeks, all that was needed was a sunny forecast.
    [Show full text]
  • Airport Listings of General Aviation Airports
    Appendix B-1: Summary by State Public New ASSET Square Public NPIAS Airports Not State Population in Categories Miles Use Classified SASP Total Primary Nonprimary National Regional Local Basic Alabama 52,419 4,779,736 98 80 75 5 70 18 25 13 14 Alaska 663,267 710,231 408 287 257 29 228 3 68 126 31 Arizona 113,998 6,392,017 79 78 58 9 49 2 10 18 14 5 Arkansas 53,179 2,915,918 99 90 77 4 73 1 11 28 12 21 California 163,696 37,253,956 255 247 191 27 164 9 47 69 19 20 Colorado 104,094 5,029,196 76 65 49 11 38 2 2 27 7 Connecticut 5,543 3,574,097 23 19 13 2 11 2 3 4 2 Delaware 2,489 897,934 11 10 4 4 1 1 1 1 Florida 65,755 18,801,310 129 125 100 19 81 9 32 28 9 3 Georgia 59,425 9,687,653 109 99 98 7 91 4 18 38 14 17 Hawaii 10,931 1,360,301 15 15 7 8 2 6 Idaho 83,570 1,567,582 119 73 37 6 31 1 16 8 6 Illinois 57,914 12,830,632 113 86 8 78 5 9 35 9 20 Indiana 36,418 6,483,802 107 68 65 4 61 1 16 32 11 1 Iowa 56,272 3,046,355 117 109 78 6 72 7 41 16 8 Kansas 82,277 2,853,118 141 134 79 4 75 10 34 18 13 Kentucky 40,409 4,339,367 60 59 55 5 50 7 21 11 11 Louisiana 51,840 4,533,372 75 67 56 7 49 9 19 7 14 Maine 35,385 1,328,361 68 36 35 5 30 2 13 7 8 Maryland 12,407 5,773,552 37 34 18 3 15 2 5 6 2 Massachusetts 10,555 6,547,629 40 38 22 22 4 5 10 3 Michigan 96,716 9,883,640 229 105 95 13 82 2 12 49 14 5 Minnesota 86,939 5,303,925 154 126 97 7 90 3 7 49 22 9 Mississippi 48,430 2,967,297 80 74 73 7 66 10 15 16 25 Missouri 69,704 5,988,927 132 111 76 4 72 2 8 33 16 13 Montana 147,042 989,415 120 114 70 7 63 1 25 33 4 Nebraska 77,354 1,826,341 85 83
    [Show full text]
  • Jackson Airports District Office Staff Assignments
    FAA Southern Region Jackson Airports District Office Staff Assignments Serving Alabama and Mississippi Address: Jackson Airports District Office 100 West Cross St., Suite B Jackson, MS 39208-2307 Office Phone: 601-664-9900 FAX: 601-664-9901 Conference room: 601-664-9845 ADO Manager Rans Black Email: [email protected] Assistant ADO Manager William Schuller Email: [email protected] Alabama Airports and FAA Program Managers FAA Program Phone number, City Airport name LOCID Manager Email address 601-664-9898 Abbeville Abbeville Municipal 0J0 Luke Flowers [email protected] 601-664-9885 Alabaster Shelby County EET Jeff Orr [email protected] Albertville Regional – 601-664-9885 Albertville 8A0 Jeff Orr Thomas J. Brumlik Field [email protected] 601-664-9885 Alex City Thomas C. Russell Field ALX Jeff Orr [email protected] 601-664-9895 Aliceville George Downer AIV Ryan Constans [email protected] South Alabama Regional at Bill 601-664-9898 Andalusia/Opp 79J Luke Flowers Benton Field [email protected] 601-664-9885 Anniston Anniston Regional ANB Jeff Orr [email protected] 601-664-9885 Ashland/Lineville Ashland/Lineville 26A Jeff Orr [email protected] 601-664-9886 Atmore Atmore Municipal 0R1 Graham Coffelt [email protected] 601-664-9898 Auburn Auburn University Regional AUO Luke Flowers [email protected] 601-664-9886 Bay Minette Bay Minette Municipal 1R8 Graham Coffelt [email protected] Staff Assignments Updated 9/21/2021 Page 2 of 15 Serving Alabama & Mississippi Jackson Airports District Office FAA Program Phone number, City
    [Show full text]
  • Desind Finding
    NATIONAL AIR AND SPACE ARCHIVES Herbert Stephen Desind Collection Accession No. 1997-0014 NASM 9A00657 National Air and Space Museum Smithsonian Institution Washington, DC Brian D. Nicklas © Smithsonian Institution, 2003 NASM Archives Desind Collection 1997-0014 Herbert Stephen Desind Collection 109 Cubic Feet, 305 Boxes Biographical Note Herbert Stephen Desind was a Washington, DC area native born on January 15, 1945, raised in Silver Spring, Maryland and educated at the University of Maryland. He obtained his BA degree in Communications at Maryland in 1967, and began working in the local public schools as a science teacher. At the time of his death, in October 1992, he was a high school teacher and a freelance writer/lecturer on spaceflight. Desind also was an avid model rocketeer, specializing in using the Estes Cineroc, a model rocket with an 8mm movie camera mounted in the nose. To many members of the National Association of Rocketry (NAR), he was known as “Mr. Cineroc.” His extensive requests worldwide for information and photographs of rocketry programs even led to a visit from FBI agents who asked him about the nature of his activities. Mr. Desind used the collection to support his writings in NAR publications, and his building scale model rockets for NAR competitions. Desind also used the material in the classroom, and in promoting model rocket clubs to foster an interest in spaceflight among his students. Desind entered the NASA Teacher in Space program in 1985, but it is not clear how far along his submission rose in the selection process. He was not a semi-finalist, although he had a strong application.
    [Show full text]