DOCSLIB.ORG

Pdf | 974.48 Kb

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pdf | 974.48 Kb ICRC ICRC - 2017 OVERVIEW OF ACTIVITIES ASSISTING CIVILIANS ALONG THE INTERNATIONAL BORDER The ICRC is an independent, neutral organization ensuring humani- We support the population of Tavush Region, helping to mitigate the tarian protection and assistance for consequences of hostilities felt by civilians living along the international border. victims of armed conflict and other We help village population find alternative rehabilitation of water supply pipelines, situations of violence. Since 1992, income opportunities to farming in insecure building of metal fencing for a water the ICRC has been present in the areas along the border. In 2017, we reservoir, and installation of water meters, region in relation to the Nagorno- consulted with local authorities to prioritize public taps and other technical Karabakh conflict. Through its the villages of Dovegh and Aygepar, where components. Since 2015, we have raised delegations in Yerevan and Baku socio-economic situations are particularly community awareness on safe behavior and and the mission in Nagorno- challenging. Vulnerable households were danger of mines and unexploded devices Karabakh, the ICRC acts as a neutral identified through a detailed household with our partner, the Armenian Red Cross intermediary between the parties survey with participation of local Red Cross Society (ARCS). This year, we held seminars to the conflict to address issues of volunteers, and 57 families received for over 500 schoolchildren in 10 border primary humanitarian concern. financial assistance to start small-scale communities. Also, we organized 19 first- businesses. Additionally, we provided aid courses with instructors of the ARCS, In Armenia, we focus on civilians multipurpose cash assistance to 19 providing life-saving skills and first aid boxes living along the international extremely vulnerable families who were to 205 members of civil protection rescue border, missing persons and their unable to start business activities because of teams, in the scope of the two-year families, mine victims and people their age, health condition or other cooperation program between the Ministry circumstances. In such cases, we work to of Emergency Situations of Armenia, the deprived of their liberty. In build multilateral support from within the ARCS and the ICRC. addition, we promote the community, local authorities and dissemination and implementation With the increased security risks in Tavush organizations to accompany our effort in of the International Humanitarian region, we supported 14 communities to set finding sustainable solutions to their Law (IHL) among national up passive protective measures, which problems. We will continue to work in authorities, academics and military reduced direct exposure of civilians to Aygepar and Dovegh in 2018, while personnel. Our key partner in shooting and shrapnel, enabling the identifying other priority villages for Armenia is the Armenian Red Cross community to live, work and move outdoors subsequent years. Society with whom we coordinate in relative safety. In 2017, we continued to activities aimed at assisting people For the last seven years, we have helped construct safer spaces, wall-in exposed improve the quality and quantity of water windows, and build protective walls for affected by the conflict. available in border communities by kindergartens, schools and other public improving the condition of infrastructure. In buildings, part of which were done thanks to 2017, we supported Voskepar, Nerkin a new partnership with the ARCS and the Karmiraghbyur and Sarigyugh through German Red Cross. Overview ՝ CLARIFYING THE FATE OF THE MISSING We support efforts of all the sides to the conflict to determine the fate of the missing and to bring answers to their families. Since 1992, we have been working on the the ICRC provided the parties to the Ministry of Defense and the Armenian issue of missing people and the plight of conflict an updated list containing around Scientific-Practical Centre of Forensic their families. Under International 4,500 names of the missing people of all Medicine. Humanitarian Law, parties to a conflict ethnic origin registered by its delegations We also encourage the parties to the must do all possible to clarify the fate and in Baku and Yerevan and the mission in conflict to map and protect burial sites whereabouts of people who went missing. Nagorno-Karabakh. This list is a necessary believed to contain the remains of people In line with its mandate, the ICRC offers its tool to help consolidate information and who might have died during the conflict, expertise acting as a neutral intermediary. intensify their efforts towards bringing with a view to their future possible Through our delegations in Yerevan and answers to the families. recovery and identification. We advise Baku and our mission in Nagorno- Since 2014, we have started collecting members of the working group of the Karabakh, we work closely with biological reference samples in the form Armenian Commission on techniques and Commissions on Prisoners of War, of buccal swabs from blood relatives of resources to gather and process Hostages and Missing People and with the missing. In the future, this data can information from witnesses, and to families of missing persons. serve as a complementary tool in identify inhumation sites. We support the Clarification of the fate is a complex identification of human remains when authorities concerned in terms of process which comprises several they are discovered or exhumed. Until technical equipment and advice for components. We gathered detailed data now we have collected samples from 778 fieldwork. on each registered missing person from blood relatives of 298 missing persons. In the family and handed it over for further Armenia, we work on this in cooperation processing to the Commissions. In 2015, with the ARCS and jointly with the SUPPORTING FAMILIES OF MISSING PERSONS We provide multidisciplinary support to families of the missing, by helping them become financially stable or navigate the legal system, and by offering psychosocial assistance. In their daily lives, many of families of the In our work accompanying families missing face different economic, social, through long periods of uncertainty, as legal and other challenges. Most of all, they wait for news about the fate of their they continue to search for answers, fight missing relative, commemoration for recognition, and talk about their activities address families’ strong desire missing relative, not letting him or her for public acknowledgement of their disappear completely in ambiguity and plight, and their need for recognition and silence. need to remember. They help them to find meaning in their loss, and reaffirm Since 2011, we have been implementing a that the family has not abandoned their comprehensive Accompaniment program loved one, while keeping the memory in collaboration with the Armenian Red alive. We helped the families organize 84 Economic support to families of the Cross and other local partners. As part of commemoration and cultural events, missing goes hand-in-hand with it, regular group meetings were organized where they got together to share psychosocial assistance. Since 2011, we for the families to address their issues memories about their missing loved ones. have carried out a housing assistance with specialists and to have a chance for These included tree planting and writing project for vulnerable households in peer interaction. of memory books, exhibitions of tapestry cooperation with the Fuller Center for made by wives of the missing and visits to Housing Armenia. Through a revolving cultural and historical sites around fund, selected families received interest- Armenia. free loans aimed to improve their housing conditions. Other families of the missing In addition, we organized 25 skill-building received grants to start small businesses workshops which involved 202 relatives of as well as multipurpose grants for urgent the missing. These workshops were household needs. Since the program star- designed to help participants acquire new ted in 2012, we have implemented 226 skills in a group of peers and cope better economic support projects for families of throughout the long process of waiting. missing people, including 13 this year. 2 ՝ Overview ASSISTING MINE VICTIMS We help mine victims in Armenia to deal with their wide-ranging challenges. We provide support to mine victims and Cross and the Armenian Center for Also this year, we provided grants to help their families throughout Armenia, to help Humanitarian Demining and Expertise. In 27 families of mine victims launch income- them deal with their multiple economic, conjunction with the Fuller Center for generating activities. legal, administrative and physical Housing in Armenia, we provided 14 loans challenges. We address their issues in 2017 for families of mine victims to working jointly with the Armenian Red renovate their houses. ACTING AS A NEUTRAL INTERMEDIARY We work to protect and assist people across the lines. Being neutral and impartial, the ICRC is in connection with the Nagorno-Karabakh highlighting their IHL commitments to capable of offering its humanitarian conflict. We help to ensure that they are distinguish between military and civilian assistance in conflict situations and to able to maintain contact with their targets, and applying proportional use of affected people, including prisoners of families and we facilitate their transfer force according to military
Load more

Recommended publications
  • General Assembly Security Council Sixty-Ninth Session Seventieth Year Agenda Items 33 and 38
    United Nations A/69/815–S/2015/170 General Assembly Distr.: General 10 March 2015 Security Council Original: English General Assembly Security Council Sixty-ninth session Seventieth year Agenda items 33 and 38 Protracted conflicts in the GUAM area and their implications for international peace, security and development The situation in the occupied territories of Azerbaijan Letter dated 9 March 2015 from the Permanent Representative of Azerbaijan to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General Upon instructions from my Government, I have the honour to draw your attention to ongoing violations of the ceasefire by the Republic of Armenia recorded for February 2015 (see annex). During this period, the armed forces of the Republic of Armenia continued intensive fire from their positions in the occupied territories of the Republic of Azerbaijan and from the territory of the Republic of Armenia on the positions of the armed forces of the Republic of Azerbaijan. As a result, two Azerbaijani servicemen were killed and one was wounded. The Republic of Armenia violated the ceasefire 1,426 times. Azerbaijan strongly condemns the continuous attempts by Armenia to escalate the situation on the front line and the deliberate targeting of the civilian population and civilian facilities. Azerbaijan will continue to take resolute measures against and respond adequately to Armenia’s ongoing aggression, violations of the ceasefire and other provocative acts. Peace and stability are contingent upon ending Armenia’s occupation of the territories of the Republic of Azerbaijan. As long as this occupation continues, human losses are inevitable on both sides, and the Republic of Armenia bears the full responsibility and should be held accountable.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Level Risk Management M a N U
    LOCAL LEVEL RISK MANAGEMENT M A N U A L Y E R E V A N 2012 1 LLRM EXECUTIVE LOCAL LEVEL RISK IMPLEMENTATION BACKGROUND 2 3 SUMMARY MANAGEMENT (LLRM) / FORMAT EXPERIENCE IN ARMENIA VULNERABILITY AND GENERAL APPROACHES AND CAPACITY 1.1 INFORMATION 2.1 3.1 PRINCIPLES APPLIED ASSESSMENT (VCA) HAZARDS RESOURCES AND THREATENING 3.2 PRACTICAL CASES TOOLS ARMENIA PROCESS A PREPARATORY PHASE DATA COLLECTION B AND RESEARCH C ANALYSIS D TOOL KIT PLANNING DRR MAINSTREAMING INTO DEVELOPMENT PLANS / DESCRIPTION AND PLANNING TOOLS IMPLEMENTATION, MONITORING AND EVALUATION DRR AND CLIMATE LLRM RISK MANAGEMENT DRR AND GENDER M A N U A L EQUITY 2 Authors: Ashot Sargsyan UNDP, DRR Adviser Armen Chilingaryan UNDP, DRR Project Coordinator Susanna Mnatsakanyan UNDP DRR Project VCA Expert Experts: Hamlet Matevosyan Rector of the Crisis Management State Academy of the Ministry of Emergency Situations Hasmik Saroyan Climate Risk Management Expert LLRM/VCA implementation Armen Arakelyan Specialist Head of “Lore” Rescue Team This manual is prepared and published with financial support from UNDP within the framework of the Project Strengthening of National Disaster Preparedness and Risk Reduction Capacities in Armenia. Empowered lives The views expressed in the publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of the Resilient nations United Nations or UNDP. 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This manual is a result of consolidation of collective efforts of many professionals and experts from different organizations and agencies – members of the UN extended Disaster Management Team, which worked during the years hand-to-hand to support and facilitate the strengthening of Disaster Management national system in Armenia.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Security Council Sixty-Eighth Session Sixty-Ninth Year Agenda Items 34 and 38
    United Nations A/68/989–S/2014/658 General Assembly Distr.: General 12 September 2014 Security Council Original: English General Assembly Security Council Sixty-eighth session Sixty-ninth year Agenda items 34 and 38 Protracted conflicts in the GUAM area and their implications for international peace, security and development The situation in the occupied territories of Azerbaijan Letter dated 9 September 2014 from the Permanent Representative of Azerbaijan to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General In accordance with instructions received from the Government of the Republic of Azerbaijan, I have the honour to draw your attention to ongoing violations of the ceasefire by the Republic of Armenia recorded for August 2014 (see annex). During this period, the armed forces of the Republic of Armenia continued intensive fire from their positions in the occupied territories of Azerbaijan and from the territory of Armenia at the positions of the armed forces of Azerbaijan, as well as at populated areas and civilian objects situated in the vicinity of the front line. As a result, nine Azerbaijani servicemen were killed and five servicemen and three civilians were wounded. Azerbaijan strongly condemns the incessant attempts by Armenia to escalate the situation on the front line and its increased and deliberate attacks on populated areas and civilian objects. Azerbaijan reserves its legitimate right to take appropriate measures to protect its population from the aggressor and respond to the ongoing violations of the ceasefire and other provocative acts. I should be grateful if you would have the present letter and its annex circulated as a document of the General Assembly, under agenda items 34 and 38, and of the Security Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Identical Letters Dated 27 April 2016 from the Chargé D’Affaires A.I
    United Nations A/70/849–S/2016/398 General Assembly Distr.: General 28 April 2016 Security Council Original: English General Assembly Security Council Seventieth session Seventy-first year Agenda items 35 and 40 Protracted conflicts in the GUAM area and their implications for international peace, security and development The situation in the occupied territories of Azerbaijan Identical letters dated 27 April 2016 from the Chargé d’affaires a.i. of the Permanent Mission of Azerbaijan to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General and the President of the Security Council Further to the letter from the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Azerbaijan, Elmar Mammadyarov, dated 20 April 2016, on the recent escalation of the situation at the line of contact of the armed forces of Armenia and Azerbaijan and the border between the two States, I would like to draw your attention to the latest gross violation by the armed forces of the Republic of Armenia of the ceasefire agreement of 5 April 2016, reached in Moscow between the Chiefs of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia, with the assistance of the Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation. The armed forces of Armenia, while concentrating additional forces and military equipment at the line of contact, starting from 23 April 2016, fired intensively on the positions of the armed forces of Azerbaijan and the civilian settlements near the confrontation line using large-calibre weapons, mortars, grenade launchers and heavy artillery.
    [Show full text]
  • Development Project Ideas Goris, Tegh, Gorhayk, Meghri, Vayk
    Ministry of Territorial Administration and Development of the Republic of Armenia DEVELOPMENT PROJECT IDEAS GORIS, TEGH, GORHAYK, MEGHRI, VAYK, JERMUK, ZARITAP, URTSADZOR, NOYEMBERYAN, KOGHB, AYRUM, SARAPAT, AMASIA, ASHOTSK, ARPI Expert Team Varazdat Karapetyan Artyom Grigoryan Artak Dadoyan Gagik Muradyan GIZ Coordinator Armen Keshishyan September 2016 List of Acronyms MTAD Ministry of Territorial Administration and Development ATDF Armenian Territorial Development Fund GIZ German Technical Cooperation LoGoPro GIZ Local Government Programme LSG Local Self-government (bodies) (FY)MDP Five-year Municipal Development Plan PACA Participatory Assessment of Competitive Advantages RDF «Regional Development Foundation» Company LED Local economic development 2 Contents List of Acronyms ........................................................................................................................ 2 Contents ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Structure of the Report .............................................................................................................. 5 Preamble ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 9 Approaches to Project Implementation ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT on Physical Audit of Construction Projects for 2016 “Hayastan” All Armenian Fund
    "NORASHEN" design and technology production cooperative REPORT on physical audit of construction projects for 2016 “Hayastan” All Armenian Fund Yerevan – 2017 Report on physical audit of construction projects of “Hayastan” All-Armenian Fund for 2016 Table of Content Name of the construction project Page REPORT (general provisions) on physical audit of construction projects of “Hayastan” All Armenian Fund for 2016 4 1. Reconstruction works of RA Yerevan city musical school named after P. Tchaykovskiy 7 2. Reconstruction works of RA Armavir region Nalbandyan village secondary school 14 3. Construction of RA Tavush marz Khachardzan village secondary school gym 21 4. Reconstruction works of RA Tavush marz Khachardzan village water supply system 28 5. Construction of RA Tavush marz Baghanis community irrigation system 32 6. Renovation works of RA Tavush marz Kirants, Yenokavan, Lusadzor, Nerqin Tsaghkavan, Sarigyugh, Sevqar communities roads leading to distant pastures 35 7. Construction works of the oncological center in NKR Stepanakert city 39 8. Reconstruction works of the school No. 9 in NKR Stepanakert city and renovation works of the garden 46 9. Construction of NKR Martuni region Sos village 300-seat secondary school 51 10. Construction works of NKR Martakert region Kochoghut village 150-seat assembly house 59 11. Construction of NKR Shushi region Qarin tak village 50-seat kindergarten 66 12. Construction of a house for G. and L. Avanesyans in NKR Martakert region Martakert town 71 13. Construction of a house for I. Hovsepyan and R. Sahakyan in NKRAskeran region Avetaranots village 75 14. Construction of a house for T. and M. Baghdasaryans in NKR Martuni region Chartar village 78 15.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Security Council Sixty-Eighth Session Sixty-Ninth Year Agenda Items 34 and 38
    United Nations A/68/829–S/2014/249 General Assembly Distr.: General 7 April 2014 Security Council Original: English General Assembly Security Council Sixty-eighth session Sixty-ninth year Agenda items 34 and 38 Protracted conflicts in the GUAM area and their implications for international peace, security and development The situation in the occupied territories of Azerbaijan Letter dated 3 April 2014 from the Permanent Representative of Azerbaijan to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General In accordance with instructions received from the Government of the Republic of Azerbaijan, I have the honour to draw your attention to ongoing violations of the ceasefire by the Republic of Armenia recorded for March 2014 (see annex). As seen from the annexed table, the armed forces of the Republic of Armenia continued intensive fire from their positions in the occupied territories of Azerbaijan and from the territory of Armenia at the positions of the armed forces of Azerbaijan, as well as at populated areas and civilian objects situated in the vicinity of the front line. As a result, one Azerbaijani serviceman, Elvin Hasanov, was killed, and one civilian was wounded. I should be grateful if you would have the present letter and its annex circulated as a document of the General Assembly, under agenda items 34 and 38, and of the Security Council. (Signed) Agshin Mehdiyev Ambassador Permanent Representative 14-29246 (E) 210414 *1429246* A/68/829 S/2014/249 Annex to the letter dated 3 April 2014 from the Permanent Representative of Azerbaijan to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General Violations of the ceasefire by the armed forces of the Republic of Armenia for March 2014a Casualties and No.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Brief and Accompanying Report Were Drawn from Security and Livelihoods
    peOpLe’s peacemaKIng perspectIves may 2012 nagorny Karabakh conflict and frontline areas Over the past twO decades progress on finding a resolution to the Nagorny Karabakh Key OutcOmes (NK) conflict has proved elusive. The unresolved conflict continues to evolve and pose persistent n cBms need to happen, where and shifting challenges on the ground, including insecurity, long-term displacement, ingrained possible, independently of the mistrust and serious limits on development and regional opportunities. Since fighting ended broader more intractable political in 1994, there has been an uneasy situation of ‘no war, no peace’ between Armenians and frameworks, to help create the Azerbaijanis. conditions for a sustainable peace agreement. The geography of the NK conflict has resulted in two distinct border contexts (see map). One features a heavily militarised and entrenched Line of Contact (LOC) along a fiercely contested n the eu can and should play a de facto border deep inside internationally recognised Azerbaijani territory, where mostly one more active role in promoting the side (Azerbaijan) has a civilian population. The second features civilian populations living on practical benefits of cBms for either side of the state border between Armenia and Azerbaijan, which although also closed conflict-affected people, as part of and militarised is less tense and offers more opportunities for mutually beneficial cooperation. its support for the OSCE Minsk Group, and challenge more the use of militant This brief highlights the potential for a number of key confidence building measures (CBMs); rhetoric. both military (joint investigation, sniper withdrawal) and civilian (resource management). n Local people living near the Line of Military CBMs are clearly required and expected by the international community; without contact require special attention cooperation on them, the sides are only undermining their own international standing.
    [Show full text]
  • Study of Legal Framework Acting in the Republic of Armenia Regulating the Activities of Cooperatives
    Study of legal framework acting in the Republic of Armenia regulating the activities of Cooperatives YEREVAN 2014 Study of legal framework acting in the Republic of Armenia regulating the activities of Cooperatives Necessity and importance of cooperatives................................................. 3 a. Legal acts regulating the activities of cooperatives acting in the Republic of Armenia (Law, Decision of the Government, Normative Act, etc.)................................................................................................. 18 List of the legal acts regulating the activities of cooperative acting in the Republic of Armenia............................................................................... 35 b. Analysis of strengths and weaknesses of legal acts focusing on legal acts related to agricultural cooperatives............................... 36 c. Study and analysis of draft legal acts on cooperatives currently circulated within the RA Government (focusing on agricultural cooperatives); expected outcomes of adoption (approval) of draft legal acts............................................................ 42 2 Study of legal framework acting in the Republic of Armenia regulating the activities of Cooperatives. Necessity and importance of Cooperatives Cooperatives have existed for over two hundred years. Acting in all spheres of economic activity, cooperatives are more durable than investment tended companies. Cooperative model has permanently adapted to the changing conditions, and the innovative new ways of cooperation
    [Show full text]
  • Armenian Tourist Attraction
    Armenian Tourist Attractions: Rediscover Armenia Guide http://mapy.mk.cvut.cz/data/Armenie-Armenia/all/Rediscover%20Arme... rediscover armenia guide armenia > tourism > rediscover armenia guide about cilicia | feedback | chat | © REDISCOVERING ARMENIA An Archaeological/Touristic Gazetteer and Map Set for the Historical Monuments of Armenia Brady Kiesling July 1999 Yerevan This document is for the benefit of all persons interested in Armenia; no restriction is placed on duplication for personal or professional use. The author would appreciate acknowledgment of the source of any substantial quotations from this work. 1 von 71 13.01.2009 23:05 Armenian Tourist Attractions: Rediscover Armenia Guide http://mapy.mk.cvut.cz/data/Armenie-Armenia/all/Rediscover%20Arme... REDISCOVERING ARMENIA Author’s Preface Sources and Methods Armenian Terms Useful for Getting Lost With Note on Monasteries (Vank) Bibliography EXPLORING ARAGATSOTN MARZ South from Ashtarak (Maps A, D) The South Slopes of Aragats (Map A) Climbing Mt. Aragats (Map A) North and West Around Aragats (Maps A, B) West/South from Talin (Map B) North from Ashtarak (Map A) EXPLORING ARARAT MARZ West of Yerevan (Maps C, D) South from Yerevan (Map C) To Ancient Dvin (Map C) Khor Virap and Artaxiasata (Map C Vedi and Eastward (Map C, inset) East from Yeraskh (Map C inset) St. Karapet Monastery* (Map C inset) EXPLORING ARMAVIR MARZ Echmiatsin and Environs (Map D) The Northeast Corner (Map D) Metsamor and Environs (Map D) Sardarapat and Ancient Armavir (Map D) Southwestern Armavir (advance permission
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Security Council Seventy-Fourth Session Seventy-Fifth Year Agenda Item 31 Prevention of Armed Conflict
    United Nations A/74/681–S/2020/100 General Assembly Distr.: General 6 February 2020 Security Council Original: English General Assembly Security Council Seventy-fourth session Seventy-fifth year Agenda item 31 Prevention of armed conflict Letter dated 4 February 2020 from the Permanent Representative of Armenia to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General Upon the instructions of my Government I am transmitting for your attention the record of the ceasefire violations by the Azerbaijani armed forces along the State border of the Republic of Armenia during the month of January 2020 (see annex I).* I am also transmitting for your attention the record of the ceasefire violations registered by the Ministry of Defence of the Republic of Artsakh (Nagorno-Karabakh Republic) during the month of January 2020 (see annex II).* I kindly request that the present letter and its annexes be circulated as a document of the General Assembly, under agenda item 31, and of the Security Council. (Signed) Mher Margaryan Ambassador Permanent Representative * The annexes are being circulated in the language of submission only. 20-01777 (E) 100220 *2001777* A/74/681 S/2020/100 Annex I to the letter dated 4 February 2020 from the Permanent Representative of Armenia to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General Violations of the ceasefire by the armed forces of the Republic of Azerbaijan along the State border with the Republic of Armenia, 1–31 January 2020 Date Direction Incidents Type of weapons/shots 1 January Tavush, Gegharkunik and Ararat
    [Show full text]
  • Prevalence and Determinants of Stunting in a Conflict-Ridden Border Region in Armenia - a Cross-Sectional Study Arin A
    A. Balalian et al. BMC Nutrition (2017) 3:85 DOI 10.1186/s40795-017-0204-9 RESEARCHARTICLE Open Access Prevalence and determinants of stunting in a conflict-ridden border region in Armenia - a cross-sectional study Arin A. Balalian1,2*, Hambardzum Simonyan1, Kim Hekimian3, Richard J. Deckelbaum3 and Aelita Sargsyan1 Abstract Background: Despite global efforts, stunting remains a public health problem in several developing countries. The prevalence of stunting among 0- to 5-year-old children in Armenia has increased from 17% in 2000 to 19% in 2010. A baseline study was conducted among preschool children in Berd, a region near the northeastern border of Armenia that has experienced intermittent military tension for over 20 years. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study including 594 children aged 6-month- 6 years old and their caregivers in our analysis, to assess the prevalence and determinants of stunting. We calculated the anthropometric measurements and hemoglobin levels of children; analyzed children’s stool and conducted a survey with children’scaregivers.We employed the hierarchical logistic regression model to explore the predictors of stunting among 25–72 months old children and multivariable logistic regression models to investigate the predictors of stunting among 6–24 months old children. Individual and residence level variables were included in the models including anemia, minimum dietary diversity, mothers’ height, the overall duration of breastfeeding, birthweight, child’s history of diarrhea and mean socio-economic score. Results: The prevalence of stunting was significantly higher among the 6–24 months old children (13.3%) compared to the children aged 25–72 months old (7.8%).
    [Show full text]