Advanced Integrative Dental Strategies for Abundant Health

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Advanced Integrative Dental Strategies for Abundant Health Advanced Integrative Dental Strategies for Abundant Health By Michaela McKenzie, DDS, A-IAOMT Presented to The American College of Advancement in Medicine ACAM Meeting – September 17, 2016 in Tucson, AZ https://iaomt.org Dr. Michaela McKenzie © Dr. Michaela McKenzie Accredited Board Member of the International Academy of Oral and Medical Toxicology (A-IAOMT) First Biologic Dentist to bring all ceramic implants to the State of Georgia. Owner of Dazzling Smiles, P.C. in Atlanta, GA Dr. Michaela McKenzie © Objectives: Attendees will learn about: o Mercury o Root Canals o Ozone Therapy o Cavitations: JON and NICO o Metal Titanium Implants vs Biocompatible All-Ceramic White Implants o Periodontitis • Receive hands-on resources and questionnaires to help your practices Dr. Michaela McKenzie © What is mercury? • Heavy metal – atomic number 80 (gold is #79); atomic wt. 200.59) • The only metal liquid at room temperature • Gas (vapor): colorless, odorless, tasteless • Vaporizes at any temperature over -38o C • Vaporization rate doubles every 10° C • Very reactive (oxidizes easily) Photo credit: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wi ki/File:Quecksilber_1.jpg Photo credit: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Periodic_Table_of_Elements Dr. Michaela McKenzie © How was mercury first discovered to be poisonous? Dr. Michaela McKenzie © The use of Mercury dates back to the 17th Century France was the first to use inorganic mercury in the form of mercuric nitrate to treat the fur of small animals for the manufacture of felt hats. From there it spread to England by the Huguenots. By the Victorian era the hatters' condition had become proverbial, as reflected in popular expressions like "mad as a hatter" and "hatters' shakes" Mad hatter disease, or mad hatter syndrome, is occupational chronic mercury poisoning among hatmakers whose felting work involved prolonged exposure to mercury vapours. The neurotoxic effects included tremor and the pathological shyness and irritability characteristic of erethism. Some of the steps in the manufacture of felt hats are illustrated in this image from 1858. Dr. Michaela McKenzie © Felt Hats were made using mercury Picture postcard of a hat factory in Danbury, Connecticut (postmarked 1911) A man working in hat manufacture with no protective equipment, putting him at risk for mercury poisoning Dr. Michaela McKenzie © Signs and symptoms: red fingers, red toes, red cheeks, sweating, loss of hearing, bleeding from the ears and mouth, loss of appendages such as teeth, hair, and nails, lack of coordination, poor memory, shyness, insomnia, nervousness, tremors, and dizziness. Dr. Michaela McKenzie © Minamata disease (Japanese: Ỉಛ⑓ Hepburn: Minamata-byō?), sometimes referred to as Chisso-Minamata disease (ࢳࢵࢯỈಛ⑓ Chisso-Minamata-byō?) Dr. Michaela McKenzie © Minamata Bay was heavily polluted from 1932 through 1968 by wastewater from a fertilizer company. Effects on wildlife were severe! Cats that ate the fish would develop strange body contortions -"dancing cat fever".[1] Dr. Michaela McKenzie © Minamata Disease •Minamata Disease is a disease that is caused by methyl mercury. Methly mercury is taken into our bodies by eating fish and shellfish, which are polluted by factory drainage. Symptoms of Minamata Disease • Attacks the brain and central nervous system Mercury Toxicity Causes various symptoms: • Numbness in extremities • Unsteadiness in legs and hands • Extreme fatigue • Tinnitus - ringing in ears, and/or loss of hearing • Ocular damage - narrowing field of vision • slurred speech • Ataxia – uncontrolled, awkward movements • Earlier victims: became unconscious, insane, or died a month after the symptoms started • Chronic Symptoms: migraine headaches, frequent tiredness, loss of smell and taste, and memory loss, brain fog and forgetfulness. Dr. Michaela McKenzie © Mercury affects all of the following: How Does Mercury Affect the Brain and Spinal Cord? Methyl mercury targets and kills neurons in specific areas of the nervous system: Visual Cortex Cerebellum Dorsal root ganglia Mercury loves Sulfur groups Sulfur groups are found in many areas of the body Mercury vapor crosses the Blood Brain Barrier - it binds to the sulfur groups in Myelin and Unravels the Myelin --- BRAIN FOG The thyroid is full of Sulfur Groupss Demyelination - damage to protective covering (myelin sheath) surrounding nerve fibers in your brain & spinal cord When the myelin sheath is damaged, nerve impulses slow or even stop, causing neurological problems Dr. Michaela McKenzie © Mercury affects the Thyroid Gland What are the Causes of Hashimoto's Thyroiditis? •Environmental Toxins Such as Mercury and Pesticides (Heavy Metal Poisoning!) •Hashimoto’s is leading cause of hypothyroidism and goiter in the United States.atess. •25 percent may develop additional conditions such as Type 1 diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, pernicious anemia, adrenal insufficiency, lupus, and other autoimmune disorders. Dr. Michaela McKenzie © Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain how mercury kills neurons: • Protein inhibition • Disruption of mitochondria function Porphyrin biosynthesis pathways inhibited by toxic metalssss • Disruption of neurotransmitters • Direct affect on ion exchange in a neuron • Destruction of the structural framework of neurons Dr. Michaela McKenzie © Scientific studies have identified Dental Mercury as a potentially causational or exacerbating factor in the following conditions: Dr. Michaela McKenzie © Highlight On: Mercury Fillings with High Copper • 1975 High levels of copper were added to amalgam fillings • Were touted by the ADA to be “state of the art” because they didn’t release mercury • European studies found high-copper amalgams released 50 times more mercury • 1976 – increase in autoimmune disorders. Specifically onset of ALS or Lou Gehrig’s Disease • 1976 – incidence of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) jumped from 8,800 per year to 123,000 in one year. The year high copper was added to amalgams. History of Hg in Dentistry Dr. Michaela McKenzie © The History of Mercury Amalgam Dental Fillings: In 1819 the English Chemist – Bell, first discovered that he could combine silver and mercury and it would form an amalgamation. In 1826 amalgam was first used in England and France to fill dental cavities. Photo Credit: Randall Mooore; Evidenc e of Harm Barbers became the first dentists in the U.S. – because of their reclining chairs ●In 1833 the Crawcour Brothers came over from France and introduced Mercury Amalgam fillings to the U.S. ●In the 1850's, the American Society of Dental Surgeons banned the use of mercury fillings for its members. ●The pro-mercury faction of dentists founded the American Dental Association (ADA) in 1859. Dr. Michaela McKenzie © History of the Dental Amalgam Controversy 1819 Invention of silver/mercury amalgam by the English chemist, Bell. 1826 First use of dental amalgam in England and France. 1830 Amalgam fillings first used in the U.S. 1840 Organized dentistry American Society of Dental Surgeons formed. Members were required to sign a pledge promising not to use mercury fillings. 1859 American Dental Association was formed. The ADA supported the use of silver amalgam then as the filling material of choice, as it still does today. 1926 The German chemist, Dr. Alfred Stock researched mercury poisoning and identified through his research that silver amalgam fillings in the mouth were a source of mercury vapor. 1957 Dr. Karl 0. Frykholm's studies in Sweden concluded that when saliva covered the amalgam filling, mercury is no longer released. 1976 The Federal Drug Administration pronounced acceptance of amalgam fillings and "grandfathered" their approval under the G.R.A.S. (generally recognized as safe) category, due to its long term usage. 1979 Research began appearing in the literature documenting that mercury vapor was constantly being released from amalgam fillings, especially when the fillings were stimulated by chewing, brushing, or heat exposure. 1984 Human autopsy studies were published which demonstrated that the amount of mercury found in brain and kidney tissue was directly related to the amount of mercury amalgam fillings in the teeth. Significant research at the University of Calgary School of Medicine demonstrated that mercury from dental amalgam fillings could be found in the blood and tissues of pregnant mothers and their babies within a few days. 1990 The first controlled researches on the effects of dental amalgam were published. The research cited significant effects of mercury amalgam on various tissues and organs in experiments with monkeys and sheep. The media became involved when the T.V. show "60 Minutes" aired a segment entitled, "Is There A Poison In Your Mouth?" 1991 Many D.A.M.S. (Dental Amalgam Mercury Syndrome) support groups became more active in consumer awareness of the mercury amalgam issue. The F.D.A. "reviewed" amalgam as a filling material and declared that current evidence was insufficient to condemn amalgam. They did recommend, however, further studies be done. August, 1991 The National Institute of Health Technology Assessment Panel on Dental Materials issued a statement that amalgams are safe. 1992 February: At the annual meeting of the Society of Toxicology, medical scientists presented five studies demonstrating adverse health effects of mercury exposure from amalgam fillings. WHY IS THERE THE NEED FOR MERCURY-FREE & MERCURY-SAFE DENTISTRY? BECAUSE MERCURY is Toxic to HUMANS… ֏֏֏ A 2005 - World Health Organization report warned of mercury: “It may cause harmful effects to the nervous,
Recommended publications
  • 10Neurodevelopmental Effects of Childhood Exposure to Heavy
    Neurodevelopmental E¤ects of Childhood Exposure to Heavy Metals: 10 Lessons from Pediatric Lead Poisoning Theodore I. Lidsky, Agnes T. Heaney, Jay S. Schneider, and John F. Rosen Increasing industrialization has led to increased exposure to neurotoxic metals. By far the most heavily studied of these metals is lead, a neurotoxin that is particularly dangerous to the developing nervous system of children. Awareness that lead poison- ing poses a special risk for children dates back over 100 years, and there has been increasing research on the developmental e¤ects of this poison over the past 60 years. Despite this research and growing public awareness of the dangers of lead to chil- dren, government regulation has lagged scientific knowledge; legislation has been in- e¤ectual in critical areas, and many new cases of poisoning occur each year. Lead, however, is not the only neurotoxic metal that presents a danger to children. Several other heavy metals, such as mercury and manganese, are also neurotoxic, have adverse e¤ects on the developing brain, and can be encountered by children. Al- though these other neurotoxic metals have not been as heavily studied as lead, there has been important research describing their e¤ects on the brain. The purpose of the present chapter is to review the neurotoxicology of lead poisoning as well as what is known concerning the neurtoxicology of mercury and manganese. The purpose of this review is to provide information that might be of some help in avoiding repeti- tion of the mistakes that were made in attempting to protect children from the dan- gers of lead poisoning.
    [Show full text]
  • Approach to the Poisoned Patient
    PED-1407 Chocolate to Crystal Methamphetamine to the Cinnamon Challenge - Emergency Approach to the Intoxicated Child BLS 08 / ALS 75 / 1.5 CEU Target Audience: All Pediatric and adolescent ingestions are common reasons for 911 dispatches and emergency department visits. With greater availability of medications and drugs, healthcare professionals need to stay sharp on current trends in medical toxicology. This lecture examines mind altering substances, initial prehospital approach to toxicology and stabilization for transport, poison control center resources, and ultimate emergency department and intensive care management. Pediatric Toxicology Dr. James Burhop Pediatric Emergency Medicine Children’s Hospital of the Kings Daughters Objectives • Epidemiology • History of Poisoning • Review initial assessment of the child with a possible ingestion • General management principles for toxic exposures • Case Based (12 common pediatric cases) • Emerging drugs of abuse • Cathinones, Synthetics, Salvia, Maxy/MCAT, 25I, Kratom Epidemiology • 55 Poison Centers serving 295 million people • 2.3 million exposures in 2011 – 39% are children younger than 3 years – 52% in children younger than 6 years • 1-800-222-1222 2011 Annual report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers Toxic Exposure Surveillance System Introduction • 95% decline in the number of pediatric poisoning deaths since 1960 – child resistant packaging – heightened parental awareness – more sophisticated interventions – poison control centers Epidemiology • Unintentional (1-2
    [Show full text]
  • Recreational Noise-Induced Hearing Loss
    Hearing loss due to recreational exposure to loud sounds A review World Health Organization Hearing loss due to recreational exposure to loud sounds A review World Health Organization Contributors: Etienne Krug, Maria Alarcos Cieza, Shelly Chadha, Laura Sminkey, Thais Morata, DeWet Swanepoel, Adrian Fuente, Warwick Williams, Joseph Cerquone, Ricardo Martinez, Gretchen Stevens, Margie Peden, Sowmya Rao, Paras Agarwal, Eighmey Zeeck, Anna Bladey, Malachi Arunda, Aileen Ncube. Graphics Credits: INIS Communications WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data Hearing loss due to recreational exposure to loud sounds: a review. 1.Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced. 2.Music. 3.Noise. 4.Recreation. 5.Noise. Transportation. 6.Adolescent. I.World Health Organization. ISBN 978 92 4 150851 3 (NLM classification: WV 270) © World Health Organization 2015 All rights reserved. Publications of the World Health Organization are available on the WHO website (http://www.who.int) or can be purchased from WHO Press, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel.: +41 22 791 3264; fax: +41 22 791 4857; e-mail: [email protected]). Requests for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications – whether for sale or for non- commercial distribution – should be addressed to WHO Press through the WHO website (http://www.who.int/about/licensing/copyright_form/en/index.html). The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Sound Management of Pesticides and Diagnosis and Treatment Of
    * Revision of the“IPCS - Multilevel Course on the Safe Use of Pesticides and on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Presticide Poisoning, 1994” © World Health Organization 2006 All rights reserved. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters. All reasonable precautions have been taken by the World Health Organization to verify the information contained in this publication. However, the published material is being distributed without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. The responsibility for the interpretation and use of the material lies with the reader. In no event shall the World Health Organization be liable for damages arising from its use. CONTENTS Preface Acknowledgement Part I. Overview 1. Introduction 1.1 Background 1.2 Objectives 2. Overview of the resource tool 2.1 Moduledescription 2.2 Training levels 2.3 Visual aids 2.4 Informationsources 3. Using the resource tool 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Training trainers 3.2.1 Organizational aspects 3.2.2 Coordinator’s preparation 3.2.3 Selection of participants 3.2.4 Before training trainers 3.2.5 Specimen module 3.3 Trainers 3.3.1 Trainer preparation 3.3.2 Selection of participants 3.3.3 Organizational aspects 3.3.4 Before a course 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Other People Hear the Noise in My Ears? Not Usually, but Sometimes They Are Able to Hear a (Ertant Type Oftinnitus
    Not at all. Tinnitus is the name for these head noises, and they are very common. Nearly 36 million Americans suffer from this discomfort. Tinnitus mav come and go, or you may be aware of a continuous sound. It can vary in pitch from a low roar to a high squeal or whine, and you may hear it in one or both ears. When the ringing is constant, It can be annoying and distracting. More than seven million people are afflicted so severely that they cannot lead normal lives. Can other people hear the noise in my ears? Not usually, but sometimes they are able to hear a (ertant type oftinnitus. This is called objective tinnitus, and it is caused either by abnormalities in blood vessels around the outside of the ear or by muscle spasms, which may sound like clicks or crackling illside the middle ear. There are many causes for subjective tinnitus, the nOlSC only you can hear. Some causes are not serious (a small plug of wax in the ear canal might cause temporary tinnitus). Tinnitus can also be a symptom of more serious middle ear problems such as infection, a hole in the eardrum, an accumulation of fluid, or stiffening (otosclerosis) of the middle ear bones. Tinnitus may also be caused by allergy, high or 10\V blood pressure (blood circulation problems), OUTER EAR MIDDLE EAR INNER EAR \ a tumor, diabetes, thyroid problems, injury to the head or neck, and a variety of other causes including medications such as anti-inflammatories, antibiotics, sedatives/antidepressants, and aspirin.
    [Show full text]
  • A Short History of Occupational Disease: 2. Asbestos, Chemicals
    Ulster Med J 2021;90(1):32-34 Medical History A SHORT HISTORY OF OCCUPATIONAL DISEASE: 2. ASBESTOS, CHEMICALS, RADIUM AND BEYOND Petts D, Wren MWD, Nation BR, Guthrie G, Kyle B, Peters L, Mortlock S, Clarke S, Burt C. ABSTRACT OCCUPATIONAL CANCER Historically, the weighing out and manipulation of dangerous Towards the end of the 18th century, a possible causal link chemicals frequently occurred without adequate protection between chemicals and cancer was reported by two London from inhalation or accidental ingestion. The use of gloves, surgeons. In 1761, John Hill reported an association between eye protection using goggles, masks or visors was scant. snuff, a tobacco product, and nasopharyngeal cancer, From Canary Girls and chimney sweeps to miners, stone and, in 1775, Percival Pott described a high incidence of cutters and silo fillers, these are classic exemplars of the subtle scrotal cancer in chimney sweeps. Pott, a surgeon at St (and in some cases not so subtle) effects that substances, Bartholomew’s Hospital in London, published his findings,6 environments and practices can have on individual health. which he attributed to contamination with soot. This excellent INTRODUCTION epidemiological study is considered to be the first report of a potential carcinogen. Pott’s work led to the foundation of It has been known for many centuries that certain diseases occupational medicine and to the Chimney Sweep Act of were associated with particular occupations (i.e. wool- 1788. In 1895, Ludwig Reyn reported that aromatic amines sorters disease in the textile industry, cowpox in milk maids used in certain dye industries in Germany were linked and respiratory problems in miners and stone workers).
    [Show full text]
  • Indoor Air Mercury May 2003
    Indoor Air Mercury May 2003 Why is Mercury a Problem in Indoor Air? Mercury is a potent neurotoxin found in a variety of products. It affects the brain, liver and kidneys and can cause developmental disorders in children. Young children and developing fetuses are especially at risk. Metallic, or elemental mercury, is a liquid at room temperature and like any other liquid it evaporates into the air, where it can be inhaled. Exposures can occur in the home when a mercury-containing item, such as a thermometer, breaks and is not properly cleaned up. They can occur in the workplace when mercury or mercury-containing device/materials are not carefully handled and safely managed or when workplace or storage areas are not properly ventilated. Exposures can also occur when children find and play with improperly stored mercury; many cases of mercury poisoning result for this reason.1 When spilled in a small, poorly-ventilated room, mercury can pose significant health threats. Very small amounts of metallic mercury, released into an enclosed space, (i.e., a few drops) can raise air concentrations of mercury to levels that may be harmful to health. The longer people breathe the contaminated air, the greater the risk to their health. In addition, metallic mercury and its vapors are extremely difficult to remove from clothes, furniture, carpet, and other porous items. If these items are not properly disposed or cleaned, the mercury can linger for months or years, continuing to pose a health threat. The risk of exposure to mercury from indoor air is not insignificant.
    [Show full text]
  • Material Safety Data Sheet
    MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET Prepared to U.S. OSHA, CMA, ANSI and Canadian WHMIS Standards PART I What is the material and what do I need to know in an emergency? 1. PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION TRADE NAME (AS LABELED) : MERCURY CHEMICAL NAME/CLASS : Mercury; Element SYNONYMS: Colloidal Mercury, Quick Silver; Liquid Silver; NCI-C60399; Hydrargyrum PRODUCT USE : Variety of industrial, analytical, and research applications. SUPPLIER/MANUFACTURER'S NAME : COMPANY ADDRESS : DFG MERCURY CORP 909 pitner Evanston Ill 60202 EMERGENCY PHONE : 1 800 424 9300 BUSINESS PHONE : 1 847 869 7800 DATE OF PREPARATION : May 20, 1997 DATE OF REVISION : October 7, 2013 2. COMPOSITION and INFORMATION ON INGREDIENTS CHEMICAL NAME CAS # %w/w EXPOSURE LIMITS IN AIR ACGIH-TLV OSHA-PEL OTHER TWA STEL TWA STEL IDLH mg/m 3 mg/m 3 mg/m 3 mg/m 3 mg/m 3 mg/m 3 Mercury 7439-97-6 100 0.025, (skin) NE Mercury 0.1 (ceiling) 10 NIOSH REL: Exposure limits are A4 (Not Vapor: 0.5, STEL = 0.1 (ceiling, for Mercury, Classifiable Skin; Non-alkyl Mercury skin) Inorganic as a Human (Vacated Compounds: 0.1 DFG MAKs: Compounds Carcinogen) 1989 PEL) Ceiling, skin TWA = 0.1 (Vacated 1989 PEAK = 10 •MAK 30 PEL) min., momentary value Carcinogen: EPA-D; IARC-3, TLV-A4 NE = Not Established. See Section 16 for Definitions of Terms Used. NOTE: ALL WHMIS required information is included in appropriate sections based on the ANSI Z400.1-1998 format. This product has been classified in accordance with the hazard criteria of the CPR and the MSDS contains all the information required by the CPR.
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
    Abstracts Eliminating Occupational Disease: areas in the country. The study studied 40 small scale industries, and collected 40 water samples (potable) for cyanide and mer- Translating Research into Action cury which are used in mining. Questionnaire-guided interviews EPICOH 2017 and work analysis covering mining practices and risk exposures were conducted, as well as chemical analysis through gas chro- 28–31 August 2017, Edinburgh, UK matography. Results of the study showed unsafe conditions in the industries such as risk of fall during erection and dismantling of scaffolds, guard rails were not provided in scaffoldings, man- Poster Presentation ual extraction of underground ores, use of explosives, poor visi- bility in looking for ores to take out to surface, exposure to Pesticides noise from explosives, and to dust from the demolished struc- tures. Mine waste was drained into soil or ground and/or rivers and streams. The most common health problems among miners 0007 ASSESSMENT OF PESTICIDE EXPOSURE AND were hypertension (62%), followed by hypertensive cardiovascu- OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH OF FARMERS IN lar disease due to left wall ischemia (14%). Health symptoms THE PHILIPPINES such as dermatitis, and peripheral neuropathy were noted and Jinky Leilanie Lu. National Institutes of Health, Institute of Health Policy and Development these can be considered as manifestations of chronic cyanide poi- Studies, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, The Philippines soning, further, aggravated by improper use of protective equip- ment. For the environmental samples of potable water, 88% and 10.1136/oemed-2017-104636.1 98% were positive with mercury and cyanide respectively. About 52% of drinking water samples exceeded the TLV for mercury Aims This is a study conducted among 534 farmers in an while 2% exceeded the TLV for cyanide.
    [Show full text]
  • At Work in the World
    Perspectives in Medical Humanities At Work in the World Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on the History of Occupational and Environmental Health Edited by Paul D. Blanc, MD and Brian Dolan, PhD Page Intentionally Left Blank At Work in the World Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on the History of Occupational and Environmental Health Perspectives in Medical Humanities Perspectives in Medical Humanities publishes scholarship produced or reviewed under the auspices of the University of California Medical Humanities Consortium, a multi-campus collaborative of faculty, students and trainees in the humanities, medi- cine, and health sciences. Our series invites scholars from the humanities and health care professions to share narratives and analysis on health, healing, and the contexts of our beliefs and practices that impact biomedical inquiry. General Editor Brian Dolan, PhD, Professor of Social Medicine and Medical Humanities, University of California, San Francisco (ucsf) Recent Monograph Titles Health Citizenship: Essays in Social Medicine and Biomedical Politics By Dorothy Porter (Fall 2011) Paths to Innovation: Discovering Recombinant DNA, Oncogenes and Prions, In One Medical School, Over One Decade By Henry Bourne (Fall 2011) The Remarkables: Endocrine Abnormalities in Art By Carol Clark and Orlo Clark (Winter 2011) Clowns and Jokers Can Heal Us: Comedy and Medicine By Albert Howard Carter iii (Winter 2011) www.medicalhumanities.ucsf.edu [email protected] This series is made possible by the generous support of the Dean of the School of Medicine at ucsf, the Center for Humanities and Health Sciences at ucsf, and a Multi-Campus Research Program grant from the University of California Office of the President.
    [Show full text]
  • Hearing Loss
    Integrated care for older people (ICOPE) Guidelines on community-level interventions to manage declines in intrinsic capacity Evidence profile: hearing loss Scoping question: Does case finding and provision of hearing aids or assistive listening devices produce any benefit or harm for older people 60 years of age and over with hearing loss? The full ICOPE guidelines and complete set of evidence profiles are available at who.int/ageing/publications/guidelines-icope Painting: “Wet in Wet” by Gusta van der Meer. At 75 years of age, Gusta has an artistic style that is fresh, distinctive and vibrant. A long-time lover of art, she finds that dementia is no barrier to her artistic expression. Appreciated not just for her art but also for the support and encouragement she gives to other artists with dementia, Gusta participates in a weekly art class. Copyright by Gusta van der Meer. All rights reserved Evidence profile: hearing loss Contents Background ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Part 1: Evidence review .................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Scoping question in PICO format (population, intervention, comparison, outcome) ............................................................................................. 2 Search strategy
    [Show full text]
  • Mercury Study Report to Congress
    United States EPA-452/R-97-007 Environmental Protection December 1997 Agency Air Mercury Study Report to Congress Volume V: Health Effects of Mercury and Mercury Compounds Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards and Office of Research and Development c7o032-1-1 MERCURY STUDY REPORT TO CONGRESS VOLUME V: HEALTH EFFECTS OF MERCURY AND MERCURY COMPOUNDS December 1997 Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards and Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection Agency TABLE OF CONTENTS Page U.S. EPA AUTHORS ............................................................... iv SCIENTIFIC PEER REVIEWERS ...................................................... v WORK GROUP AND U.S. EPA/ORD REVIEWERS ......................................viii LIST OF TABLES...................................................................ix LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................. xii LIST OF SYMBOLS, UNITS AND ACRONYMS ........................................xiii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................... ES-1 1. INTRODUCTION ...........................................................1-1 2. TOXICOKINETICS ..........................................................2-1 2.1 Absorption ...........................................................2-1 2.1.1 Elemental Mercury ..............................................2-1 2.1.2 Inorganic Mercury ..............................................2-2 2.1.3 Methylmercury .................................................2-3 2.2 Distribution
    [Show full text]