DOCSLIB.ORG

Snow's Portrait of Science in Politics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Snow's Portrait of Science in Politics OPINION TWO CULTURES NATURE|Vol 459|7 May 2009 Snow’s portrait of science in politics Charles Percy Snow ignited controversy around science and in Germany. Snow homes in on two men, both scientists. One is policy-making in a series of lectures at Harvard University a year after the chemist Henry Tizard — rector of Imperial College, London, his ‘Two Cultures’ debate. Below we reproduce an extract from the and chairman of an influential committee that advised the Labour resulting book, Science and Government. It gives a remarkable insight government to invest in radar technology. The other is Tizard’s into how science feeds into political decision-making. one-time friend and later rival, Frederick Lindemann, a close adviser Snow was one of Britain’s leading science civil servants. He to Winston Churchill, who was then part of the Conservative capitalized on his experience at the heart of the government opposition. machinery to analyse the role of science and scientists in the United Such an account could have been dry and factual, but this is not Kingdom during the Second World War. He wanted to disentangle how what we get from Snow’s pen. Instead, his readers are treated to political decisions were made during the war and, importantly, how a page-turner. Snow the novelist is not afraid to tell us what his scientific advice was used to make them. characters might be thinking. He is indiscreet about their personal In the extract, Snow gives a colourful account of the decision to lives, social connections and professional backgrounds. He guesses invest in the development of radar — an unproven technology in the their motives and provides his own verdict on their judgements. mid-1930s that would prove to be key to the success of the allied war Snow was attacked for not being detached enough in his analysis. effort. Yet the book’s accessibility ensured it was widely read. Five decades In the years leading up to the war, the British government did not later, Science and Government remains a rare inside view of the know how to handle the rise of Adolf Hitler and his military build-up relationship between science and political authority. Joanne Baker Extract from important to start with. No Science and Government one took much notice when its by C. P. Snow membership was announced. Harvard University Press: 1961. There may have been slight curiosity about the appoint- ment, which was entirely due to In 1934 both Tizard and Lindemann Wimperis,2 of Tizard as chair- were nearly fifty. Of the two, Tizard man. The appointment would had been by a long way the more not and could not have happened, successful, though even he, judged though, if Tizard had not been so by the standard he set himself, had well connected in official life. not lived up to his promise. He was Well, that committee was called ARCHIVE/GETTY CENTRAL PRESS/HULTON GETTY; a trusted man of affairs, he had been the Tizard Committee almost from OTO/ knighted, he was head of a univer- its first meeting. It is slightly touch- sity institution, but in his own eyes ing that in his diary Tizard, who he had not done much. could not use that title, never seems POPPERF As for Lindemann, he had done to have been quite certain what its much less. The professional physicists official title really was. did not take him seriously as a scien- Frederick Lindemann (right) vehemently disagreed with Henry Tizard From the first meeting on Janu- tist, and dismissed him as a cranky (left) over the development of radar as Britain’s method of air defence. ary 28th, 1935 he gripped the prob- society pet. Scientifically his name lems. This was the job for which was worth little. He was the intimate friend were beating round for some sort of defence. he was born. Quite soon, by the summer of of [Churchill] a politician whose name was There was nothing accidental about this. It was that year, small ripples of confidence oozed scarcely worth as much. predictable that England, more vulnerable to under the secret doors and penetrated White- Then, quite suddenly, Tizard was given the air attack than any major country, would spend hall, almost the only ripples of confidence that chance for which he was made. England was more effort trying to keep bombers off. But touched the official world during those years. strategically in a desperately vulnerable posi- there was something accidental and unpredict- Tizard insisted on a very small committee tion, for reasons — the tiny size of the coun- able in Tizard being given his head. which he chose himself. Wimperis had to be try, the density of the population — which The Air Ministry, under the influence of there, Rowe was brought in as secretary, but apply more harshly today. In 1934 [Stanley] their scientific adviser, H. E. Wimperis, him- at the beginning there were only two mem- Baldwin was the main figure in the govern- self prodded by a bright young government bers of independent standing, A. V. Hill and ment, and it was only two years since he had scientist called A. P. Rowe,1 set up a Committee P. M. S. Blackett. Both of these were eminent said lugubriously: “The bomber will always for the Scientific Study of Air Defence. Its scientists, of a quite different order of accom- get through.” terms of reference were as flat as usual: “To plishment from Tizard or Lindemann. Hill In public, rebellious politicians like Church- consider how far advances in scientific and was one of the most distinguished physiolo- ill were attacking the whole of the government’s technical knowledge can be used to strengthen gists in the world and had won a Nobel prize defence policy. In secret, the government sci- the present methods of defence against hos- in 1922. Blackett, who was only thirty-seven entists, the military staffs, the high officials, tile aircraft.” The committee was nothing very at this time, was one of [Ernest] Rutherford’s 36 © 2009 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved NATURE|Vol 459|7 May 2009 TWO CULTURES OPINION most brilliant pupils, and later himself won a virtue as an interpreter between the two sides. important decisions were in effect taken. By Nobel prize.3 … “I utterly refuse to wear a busby,” he used to the end of 1936 most of those decisions were The committee made up its mind about say. Fairly soon he had not only got radar translated into action. It was one of the most [radar] before the device really existed. Watson stations in principle accepted and hoped for, effective small committees in history. But Watt, who was the pioneer of radar in England, but also succeeded, with the help of Blackett’s before it clinched its choices, there was a most … , had done some preliminary experiments. exceptional drive and picturesque row. This device might, not certainly but possi- The committee had been set up, as we bly, work in real war in three or four years. saw, from inside the Air Ministry. One of Nothing else possibly could. Tizard, Hill, the reasons was, no doubt, to forestall criti- Blackett had faith in their own rea- cism from outside, which came most loudly soning. Without fuss, and without and effectively from Churchill. In 1934 he backward glances, the choice was had publicly challenged the government’s made. That was only a resolution underestimate of the size of Hitler’s air on paper, and they had to make force. His figures, which had been ILLUSTRATION BY SUZANNE BARRETT SUZANNE BY ILLUSTRATION it actual. produced by Lindemann, were The administrative mechanism much nearer the truth than the by which this was done is itself government’s. Thus, simultane- interesting. In form the Air Min- ously, there were going on the ister, Lord Swinton,4 arranged for secret deliberations and discus- a new high-level committee … . sions of the Tizard Committee, and Over this new body he himself an acrimonious military argument presided, and on to it was brought in full light in the House of Com- the government’s chief military mons and the press, with Churchill critic, Winston Churchill. In fact, the antigovernment spokesman. however, one has got to imagine It is one of the classical cases of a great deal of that apparently “closed” politics coexisting with casual to-ing and fro-ing by which “open” politics. Passing from one high English business gets done. to the other, an observer would not As soon as the Tizard committee have known that he was dealing thought there was something in with the same set of facts. By the radar, one can take it that Tizard middle of 1935 Baldwin, who had would lunch with Hankey5 at the just in form as well as fact become Athenaeum; Hankey, the secre- Prime Minister, wanted to reduce tary of the Cabinet, would find the temperature of the “open” mili- it convenient to have a cup of tea tary argument. He used the ortho- with Swinton and Baldwin. If the dox manoeuvre of asking Churchill Establishment had not trusted in. Not into the Cabinet: the per- Tizard as one of their own, there sonal rifts were too deep for that, might have been a waste of months but onto the new Swinton Com- or years. In fact, everything went mittee, [a] political committee …, through with the smoothness, the which was to keep a supervisory lack of friction, and the effortless speed insight, in beginning to teach one lesson eye on air defence. which can only happen in England when each to the scientists and the military, lessons The history is very tangled at this point.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reginald Victor Jones CH FRS (1911-1997)
    Catalogue of the papers and correspondence of Reginald Victor Jones CH FRS (1911-1997) by Alan Hayward NCUACS catalogue no. 95/8/00 R.V. Jones 1 NCUACS 95/8/00 Title: Catalogue of the papers and correspondence of Reginald Victor Jones CH FRS (1911-1997), physicist Compiled by: Alan Hayward Description level: Fonds Date of material: 1928-1998 Extent of material: 230 boxes, ca 5000 items Deposited in: Churchill Archives Centre, Churchill College, Cambridge CB3 0DS Reference code: GB 0014 2000 National Cataloguing Unit for the Archives of Contemporary Scientists, University of Bath. NCUACS catalogue no. 95/8/00 R.V. Jones 2 NCUACS 95/8/00 The work of the National Cataloguing Unit for the Archives of Contemporary Scientists, and the production of this catalogue, are made possible by the support of the Research Support Libraries Programme. R.V. Jones 3 NCUACS 95/8/00 NOT ALL THE MATERIAL IN THIS COLLECTION MAY YET BE AVAILABLE FOR CONSULTATION. ENQUIRIES SHOULD BE ADDRESSED IN THE FIRST INSTANCE TO: THE KEEPER OF THE ARCHIVES CHURCHILL ARCHIVES CENTRE CHURCHILL COLLEGE CAMBRIDGE R.V. Jones 4 NCUACS 95/8/00 LIST OF CONTENTS Items Page GENERAL INTRODUCTION 6 SECTION A BIOGRAPHICAL A.1 - A.302 12 SECTION B SECOND WORLD WAR B.1 - B.613 36 SECTION C UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN C.1 - C.282 95 SECTION D RESEARCH TOPICS AND SCIENCE INTERESTS D.1 - D.456 127 SECTION E DEFENCE AND INTELLIGENCE E.1 - E.256 180 SECTION F SCIENCE-RELATED INTERESTS F.1 - F.275 203 SECTION G VISITS AND CONFERENCES G.1 - G.448 238 SECTION H SOCIETIES AND ORGANISATIONS H.1 - H.922 284 SECTION J PUBLICATIONS J.1 - J.824 383 SECTION K LECTURES, SPEECHES AND BROADCASTS K.1 - K.495 450 SECTION L CORRESPONDENCE L.1 - L.140 495 R.V.
    [Show full text]
  • 571 Write Up.Pdf
    This paper comprises a brief history of the origins and early development of radar meteorology. Therefore, it will cover the time period from a few years before World War II through about the 1970s. The earliest developments of radar meteorology occurred in England, the United States, and Canada. Among these three nations, however, most of the first discoveries and developments were made in England. With the exception of a few minor details, it is there where the story begins. Even as early as 1900, Nicola Tesla wrote of the potential for using waves of a frequency from the radio part of the electromagnetic spectrum to detect distant objects. Then, on 11 December 1924, E. V. Appleton and M.A.F. Barnett, two Englishmen, used a radio technique to determine the height of the ionosphere using continuous wave (CW) radio energy. This was the first recorded measurement of the height of the ionosphere using such a method, and it got Appleton a Nobel Prize. However, it was Merle A. Tuve and Gregory Breit (the former of Johns Hopkins University, the latter of the Carnegie Institution), both Americans, who six months later – in July 1925 – did the same thing using pulsed radio energy. This was a simpler and more direct way of doing it. As the 1930s rolled on, the British sensed that the next world war was coming. They also knew they would be forced to defend themselves against the German onslaught. Knowing they would be outmanned and outgunned, they began to search for solutions of a technological variety. This is where Robert Alexander Watson Watt – a Scottish physicist and then superintendent of the Radio Department at the National Physical Laboratory in England – came into the story.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientists, Statesmen and War: the Case of the Scientific Advisory Committee
    James Goodchild Ex Historia 46 James Goodchild 1 University of Exeter Scientists, Statesmen and War: The Case of the Scientific Advisory Committee. The now extensive historiography of the Second World War confirms with fascinating certainty that twentieth-century total technological warfare forced developed nation states to marry their statesmen to their scientists. While the long-term marriage itself proved a near cataclysmic affair, the wedding too had many moments of turbulence. This article examines one particular event in twentieth-century British history of scientific and technological institutionalisation. Piecing together previously unconnected primary evidence, this article re-interprets the uneasy beginnings of the Scientific Advisory Committee (SAC) to the War Cabinet established in October 1940. This article further demonstrates that even in an emergency so immense as modern war, science and politics continued to remain as awkward bedfellows. It was during the First World War that the British Government began to appreciate the value of a permanent civil partnership developing between scientists and the state. From the high pinnacles of David Lloyd George’s ‘Garden Suburbs’ – ideas men attached to the Cabinet – down to the nitty-gritty of keeping common men alive through the work of the Medical Research Committee, science began to permeate the Whitehall corridors of power in an unprecedented fashion essentially as a consequence of total war. 2 This scientific incursion was 1 James Goodchild’s ([email protected] ) academic interests are the inter-relations between twentieth-century war, science and technology, and the British state and society. He holds a BA (Hons.) in history and an M.Res (distinction) which specialised in the scientific developments of the Great War.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Americans the 1941 US Codebreaking Mission to Bletchley Park
    United States Cryptologic History The First Americans The 1941 US Codebreaking Mission to Bletchley Park Special series | Volume 12 | 2016 Center for Cryptologic History David J. Sherman is Associate Director for Policy and Records at the National Security Agency. A graduate of Duke University, he holds a doctorate in Slavic Studies from Cornell University, where he taught for three years. He also is a graduate of the CAPSTONE General/Flag Officer Course at the National Defense University, the Intelligence Community Senior Leadership Program, and the Alexander S. Pushkin Institute of the Russian Language in Moscow. He has served as Associate Dean for Academic Programs at the National War College and while there taught courses on strategy, inter- national relations, and intelligence. Among his other government assignments include ones as NSA’s representative to the Office of the Secretary of Defense, as Director for Intelligence Programs at the National Security Council, and on the staff of the National Economic Council. This publication presents a historical perspective for informational and educational purposes, is the result of independent research, and does not necessarily reflect a position of NSA/CSS or any other US government entity. This publication is distributed free by the National Security Agency. If you would like additional copies, please email [email protected] or write to: Center for Cryptologic History National Security Agency 9800 Savage Road, Suite 6886 Fort George G. Meade, MD 20755 Cover: (Top) Navy Department building, with Washington Monument in center distance, 1918 or 1919; (bottom) Bletchley Park mansion, headquarters of UK codebreaking, 1939 UNITED STATES CRYPTOLOGIC HISTORY The First Americans The 1941 US Codebreaking Mission to Bletchley Park David Sherman National Security Agency Center for Cryptologic History 2016 Second Printing Contents Foreword ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Chapter 1 Organization of Science For
    Notes The following abbreviations have been used for the location and designation of documentary sources. Cherwell Papers, Nuffield College, Oxford Public Records Office (PRO): ADM Admiralty AIR Air Ministry AVIA Ministry of Aviation CAB Cabinet Office DEFE Ministry of Defence FD Medical Research Council TTreasury WO War Office Introduction 1. CAB103/205, Science at War, Memo for ACSP, 8 October 1947. Chapter 1 Organization of Science for War 1. Editorial, Nature, 17 June 1915. 2. John Bradley, History and Development of Aircraft Instruments, 1909–1919, PhD thesis, 1994, Science Museum Library. 3. L. F. Haber, The Poisonous Cloud. Chemical Warfare in the First World War, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1986, p. 273. 4. Monika Renneberg and Mark Walker (eds), Science, Technology and National Socialism, Cambridge University Press, 1994, p. 88. 5. Ibid., p. 9. 6. Ibid., pp. 81–2. 7. Ibid., p. 6. 8. Ibid., pp. 53–8. 9. Ibid., p. 51. 10. David Holloway, Stalin and the Bomb. The Soviet Union and Atomic Energy, 1934–1956, Yale University Press, 1994, p. 146. 11. Ibid., pp. 21, 145. 12. Andrew Brown, ‘Blackett at Cambridge, 1919–1933’, Blackett Centenary Conference, 24 September 1998. 13. Sir Henry Tizard, ‘Science and the Services’, RUSI Jnl., vol. XCI, no. 563, August 1946, p. 338. 188 Notes 189 14. Peter Hennessy and Sir Douglas Hague, ‘How Hitler Reformed Whitehall’, Strathclyde Papers on Government and Politics, no. 41, 1985, p. 8. 15. Ibid., p. 19. 16. Solly Zuckerman, From Apes to Warlords, 1904–46, London, 1978, App. 1, ‘The Tots and Quots’. 17. Anon, Science in War, ‘Penguin Special’, Penguin Books, 1940.
    [Show full text]
  • Patrick Blackett in India: Military Consultant and Scientific Intervenor, 1947-72
    Patrick Blackett in India: Military Consultant and Scientific Intervenor, 1947-72. Part One Author(s): Robert S. Anderson Source: Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London, Vol. 53, No. 2 (May, 1999), pp. 253- 273 Published by: The Royal Society Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/532210 . Accessed: 09/05/2011 11:52 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at . http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=rsl. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The Royal Society is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplement One [PDF]
    Supplementary Content The Legacy of Dale R. Corson Post-Publication Supplement One July 2009 Cornell University The Internet-First University Press Preface This supplementary collection is an on-going effort to expand the initial book, The Legacy of Dale R. Corson. This supplement will be expanded from time-to-time – breaking the usual limitation of a single definitive terminal point for a traditional book edition. This book and the DVD were produced by J. Robert Cooke Published by The Internet-First University Press Ithaca, NY, USA ©2009 Cornell University All rights reserved Note: These supplementary materials may be found online at http://ecommons.library.cornell.edu/handle/1813/13182. The original book is at this address and the videos on the DVD may be viewed online (in reduced image size) at http://ecommons.library.cornell.edu/handle/1813/13197. Additional supplementary resources may be placed at these eCommons@Cornell digital repository addresses as they become available. Contents: Supplement One 01 March 2008 Microwave Radar In World War II by Dale R. Corson (9 pages) Preface This is a personal account of my role in the development of airborne RADAR during World War II – from the time I was summoned to join the staff of the MIT Radaiation Labo- ratry, through testing and implementation to the end of the war. Dale R. Corson 23 February 2003 Microwave Radar In World War II Microwave Radar In World War II Dale R. Corson, March 1, 2008 Speaking at Saturday Night Club, or anywhere else, is difficult for me now because I’m doing nothing worth speaking about.
    [Show full text]
  • George Clyde Hale, Hoosier Chemist and Pioneer in Ordnance Research and the Chemistry of the Explosive, Rdx
    Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science (1991) Volume 100 p. 173-178 173 GEORGE CLYDE HALE, HOOSIER CHEMIST AND PIONEER IN ORDNANCE RESEARCH AND THE CHEMISTRY OF THE EXPLOSIVE, RDX Marvin Carmack Department of Chemistry Indiana University Bloomington, Indiana 47405 ABSTRACT: During the 1920's, Dr. George C. Hale, a native of Indiana, developed and published a procedure for the preparation of a powerful new explosive which he named cyclonite, subsequently known as RDX. Although his research was carried out and published just after World War I, practical industrial processes for the manufacture of this explosive, as well as necessary experience with its use, did not follow until many years later. During World War II, intensive collaborative research efforts in several countries made possible large-scale and efficient production in the United States in time to have an important influence on the outcome of World War II. An important achievement in World War II was the development of pro- cesses for the manufacture of large quantities of the explosive, RDX (also known as cyclonite or hexogen; Fig. 1 A), from hexamethylenetetramine (also known as hexamine; Fig. IB) by nitrolysis with 98% nitric acid. The story of this achievement revolves about the scientific activity of a Hoosier chemist, George Clyde Hale (Urbanski, 1967; Edward, 1990). NO? ChL XH 2 N CH 2 Figure 1. A. RDX or cyclonite. B. Hexamine. George Clyde Hale was born September 29, 1891, in Cass, Sullivan County, Indiana, to Charles and Rosettie Bledsoe Hale. Charles Hale was a coal miner who ran a grocery store.
    [Show full text]
  • The Farm Hall Scientists: the United States, Britain, and Germany in the New Atomic Age, 1945-46
    The Farm Hall Scientists: The United States, Britain, and Germany in the New Atomic Age, 1945-46 by Mary A. McPartland B.A. in History and Spanish, May 2003, Regis University A Dissertation submitted to The Faculty of The Columbian College of Arts and Sciences of The George Washington University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 31, 2013 Dissertation directed by Hope M. Harrison Associate Professor of History and International Affairs The Columbian College of Arts and Sciences of The George Washington University certifies that Mary Ann McPartland has passed the Final Examination for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy as of July 23, 2013. This is the final and approved form of the dissertation. The Farm Hall Scientists: The United States, Britain, and Germany in the New Atomic Age, 1945-46 Mary A. McPartland Dissertation Research Committee: Hope M. Harrison, Associate Professor of History and International Affairs, Dissertation Director James Hershberg, Professor of History and International Affairs, Committee Member Andrew Zimmerman, Professor of History and International Affairs, Committee Member ii ©Copyright 2013 by Mary A. McPartland All rights reserved iii Acknowledgments Thank you to the many people who have been generous with their knowledge, time, and friendship during the process of researching and writing this dissertation. First and foremost, I thank my adviser, Hope Harrison, for the time she has spent reading, commenting on, and discussing my work, always encouraging me onward. I am very grateful to have had you as my guide on this journey. Feedback from my dissertation committee has also shaped my dissertation for the better.
    [Show full text]
  • The British Mission by Dennis C
    The British Mission by Dennis C. Fakley* ews of the discovery in early Henry Tizard, accompanied by Professor J. basis, and the Directorate of Tube Alloys—a 1939 of neutron-induced fission D. Cockcroft, led a mission to Washington. title chosen as a cover name—was formed in uranium immediately The MAUD Committee programme was within the Department of Scientific and N prompted ideas in the United described and was found to parallel the Industrial Research under the technical lead- Kingdom and elsewhere not only of a con- United States programme, although the lat- ership of W. A. Akers, recruited from Im- trolled fission chain reaction but also of an ter was being conducted with somewhat less perial Chemical Industries, and the policy uncontrolled, explosive chain reaction. Al- urgency. It was agreed that cooperation guidance of Sir John Anderson, Lord Presi- though official British circles viewed with a between the two countries would be mutually dent of the Council. high degree of skepticism the possible advantageous, and the necessary machinery Meanwhile, in the United States Dr. Van- significance of uranium fission for military was established. Even at this early stage the nevar Bush, head of the National Defense application, some research was initiated at British increasingly recognised that, with Research Committee, had asked the presi- British universities on the theoretical aspects their limited resources, they would have to dent of the National Academy of Sciences in of achieving an explosive reaction. Progress look to the immense production capacity of April 1941 to appoint a committee of was slow, the initial results were discourag- America for the expensive development physicists to review the uranium problem.
    [Show full text]
  • In Praise of Luddism
    COMMENT DEVELOPMENT Calestous Juma’s ANTHROPOLOGY Twenty ENVIRONMENT A call to halt POLICY Unrealistic NIH optimistic prescription for years after discovery, deep-sea vent mining before restructure will inhibit food in Africa p.31 Ötzi goes on show p.34 it starts p.36 translational research p.36 A nineteenth-century engraving of machine-breakers attacking machinery in a textile factory. In praise of Luddism Two centuries on from the Luddite insurrection, David Edgerton celebrates today’s most important opponents to new ideas, inventions and innovations: scientists. n March 1811, machine-breakers struck in the centre of England. rejected; most inventions have to be rejected if there is to be enough They were not the first or the last, but they started what became time and money to develop any at all. Scientists have had a crucial role known as the Luddite outrages or insurrection. The targets were in this opposition — they led the charge against new gadget mania Iemployers and their machines — stocking-makers and their knit- during the Second World War, and afterwards. ting frames at first, later other textile manufacturers and machines. If by ‘Luddism’ we mean, as was the case in 1811, opposition to The breakers were hand-knitters whose livelihood was threatened. specific novelties for particular reasons, as opposed to novelty in gen- The name came from General or King Ludd, the leader the Luddites eral, then Luddism is indispensable and scientists should cultivate invented as a signatory to proclamations. their important, and venerable, role as its most rigorous practitioners. LIBRARY PICTURE EVANS MARY Since then, especially in the late twentieth century, a Luddite has It is not sufficiently recognized that creation, scientific or otherwise, been someone opposed to progress, especially to science and technol- is a tragic business.
    [Show full text]
  • Describe and Assess the Political and Economic Impact on Britain of Pursuing Her Own Nuclear Programme from the MAUD Committee
    Britain and the atomic bomb: MAUD to Nagasaki. Item Type Thesis Authors Gorman, Claire L. Rights <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/3.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by- nc-nd/3.0/88x31.png" /></a><br />The University of Bradford theses are licenced under a <a rel="license" href="http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/">Creative Commons Licence</a>. Download date 02/10/2021 21:21:19 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10454/4332 Chapter One: British nuclear research and development April 1940 – October 1941 The genesis of Britain‟s nuclear programme was possible due to the rapid scientific advances in nuclear physics in the 1930‟s. James Chadwick had discovered the existence of the neutron as the last part in the existing scientific model of the atom, at the Cavendish Laboratory in Cambridge in 1932. He was a protégé of Ernest Rutherford1 and one of the ablest minds in experimental physics. Chadwick had the fortune of studying at Cambridge. „In 1932 no physics research establishment in the world possessed such excellent instruments as the Cavendish Laboratory at Cambridge‟.2 Chadwick‟s discovery of the neutron meant the chain reaction could be properly considered to make an atomic device. Neutrons were essential for this process as they had no electrical charge. „This characteristic of being electrically neutral makes it possible for the neutron to approach close to the charged nuclei of other atoms‟.3 Nazi Germany had made the breakthrough discovery in December 1938.
    [Show full text]