Oklahoma's 2 2 Species of B a T S Identification Worksheet REPLACE

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Oklahoma's 2 2 Species of B a T S Identification Worksheet REPLACE Oklahoma’ s 2 2 S p e c i e s o f B a t s (according to O k Conservation Dept.) Pallid Bat Endangered Cave Myotis Yuma Myotis Evening Bat Seminole Bat Indiana Bat REPLACE THIS REPLACE THIS REPLACE THIS REPLACE THIS WITH YOUR WITH YOUR WITH YOUR WITH YOUR PHOTO PHOTO PHOTO PHOTO Southeastern Rafinesque Big Eared Bat Myotis Identification Worksheet Family/Tribe/Genus/Species/subspecies/common names WEIGHT FORE WING 1st check visual items Face Ears & Nose closest match X GRAMS ARMS SPAN MM 2nd compare physical measurements -> MM Specimen # 1 Molossidae-Nyctinomops Macrotis- Big Free-Tailed Bat 24-30 58-64 426 Endangered 2 Molossidae-Tadarida Brasiliensis Mexican (Brazili8an) Free-Tailed Bat 11-14 36-46 301 Western Small-footed Townsendii 3 Myotinae(M)-Myotis-Austroriparius/South Eastern Myotis 5-7 36-41 254 Myotis Ozark Big 4 Myotinae -Myotis-Grisescens/Gray Myotis 7.9-13.5 40-46 275-300 Eared Bat 5 Myotinae -Myotis-Keen’s(Keenii) Myotis 4 - 6 35-38 200-260 6 Myotinae -Myotis-Leibii/Eastern Small-Footed Myotis 4.1-5.5 30-36 212-248 7 Myotinae -Myotis-Lucifugus/Little Brown Bat 7-9 34-41 190-239 8 Myotinae -Myotis-Sodalis/Indiana Myotis 7.1-7.5 35-41 240-267 9 Myotinae -Myotis-Valifer/Cave Myotis 15 37-47 296 10 Myotinae -Myotis-Yumanensis/Yuma Myotis 4-6 32-38 225 11 Myotinae-Lasionycteris-Noctivagans /Silver Haired Bat 8-12 37-44 289 12 Vespertilionidae(V)- Antrozous pallidus/ Pallid Bat 12-17 48-60 353 13 V-Plecotus(P)-Corynorhinus (C )-rafinesquei/ Rafinesque’s Big-eared 7-13 40-46 280 Endangered 14 V-P.C. Townsendii pallescens/Townsend’s Big-eared 5-13 39-47 297-320 Gray Myotis Big Brown 15 V-P.C.Townsendii ingens/Ozark Big-eared bat 7-13 39-47 270 16 V-Eptesicus Fuscus /Big Brown Bat 13-30 42-51 312-325 17 V-Lasiurus-(Hairy tailed) borealis/Eastern Red Bat 10-15 35-45 312 18 V-Lasiurus (hairy tailed) cinereus/Hoary Bat 20-35 46-58 400 19 V-Lasiurus (Hairy tailed)/Seminole Bat 10-15 35-45 300 20 V-Nycticelus Humeralis Evening Bat 5-15 33-39 260-300 21 V-Pipistrellus Hesperus/Canyon Bat was W. Pipistrelle 3-6 27-33 190 22 V-Pipistrellus-Perimyotis Subflavus Tri-Colored Bat was E. Pipistrelle 4-6 31-35 235±15 Additional bats from BCI list for Oklahoma Silvered Haired Myotis-Ciliolabrum/Western Small-Footed Myotis 4-5 30-36 242 Keen’s Myotis Myotis-Melanorhinus Myotis/ Small-footed Dark-nosed Myotis 3-7 30-36 210-250 MyotisLucifugus-Occultus Myotis/Arizona Myotis 7-9 36-41 190-239 V-Lasiurus blossevillii/Western (Desert) Red Bat 9-12 35-45 312 Additonal bats from Natureserve.org V-Plecotus Corynorhinus townsendii /Townsend’s Big-eared 5-13 39-48 297-320 Myotinae-Myotis-septentrionalis-Northern Long-eared Myotis 6-9 35-38 230-260 Make visual assessment color, fur texture, shape size of nose, ears, head put red X to all that look similar, measure and weigh check the rest see which ones check across. Include your comments below the one with X across closest match Eastern Red Bat additional measurements are in the Book “Bats of Oklahoma” if more than one checks across Comments Eastern Small-footed (Most common Myotis(Leibii) Tulsa Rehab) Photos from Merlin D.Tuttle Bat Conservation Big Free-tailed International Little Brown Bat Hoary Bat Tri-colored Bat Mexican(Brazilian) Free- Bat Canyon Bat was Batcon.org Western Pipistrelle was E Pipistrelle tailed Bat FEWERR.ORG Website http://fewerr.org The foundation for Environmental & Wildlife- Email [email protected] Education, Research & Rehab Newsgroup http://groups.yahoo.com/group.BatResQ 7822 S 69 E Pl, Tulsa, Ok 74133 Movies produced http://www.youtube.com/radarfoxbat 918-493-4943 Facebook http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=700044097&ref=ts Oklahoma’ s 2 2 S p e c i e s o f B a t s (according to O k Conservation Dept) Pallid Bat Endangered Cave Myotis Yuma Myotis Evening Bat Seminole Bat Indiana Bat Rafinesque Big Southeastern Myotis Eared Bat Identification Worksheet Family/Tribe/Genus/Species/subspecies/common names WEIGHT FORE WING 1st check visual items Face Ears & Nose closest match X GRAMS ARMS SPAN MM 2nd compare physical measurements -> MM Specimen # RH106TC2-11 X 4.5-5.6 35 190-220 1 Molossidae-Nyctinomops Macrotis- Big Free-Tailed Bat 24-30 58-64 426 2 Molossidae-Tadarida Brasiliensis Mexican (Brazili8an) Free-Tailed Bat 11-14 36-46 301 Endangered 3 Myotinae(M)-Myotis-Austroriparius/South Eastern Myotis X 5-7 X 36-41 254 Western Small-footed Townsendii 4 Myotinae -Myotis-Grisescens/Gray Myotis 7.9-13.5 40-46 275-300 Myotis Ozark Big 5 Myotinae -Myotis-Keen’s(Keenii) Myotis X 4 - 6 X 35-38X 200-260X Eared Bat 6 Myotinae -Myotis-Leibii/Eastern Small-Footed Myotis X 4.1-5.5 X 30-36X 212-248X 7 Myotinae -Myotis-Lucifugus/Little Brown Bat X 7-9 34-41X 190-239X 8 Myotinae -Myotis-Sodalis/Indiana Myotis X 7.1-7.5 35-41X 240-267 9 Myotinae -Myotis-Valifer/Cave Myotis X 15 37-47 296 10 Myotinae -Myotis-Yumanensis/Yuma Myotis X 4-6 X 32-38X 225 11 Myotinae-Lasionycteris-Noctivagans /Silver Haired Bat 8-12 37-44 289 12 Vespertilionidae(V)- Antrozous pallidus/ Pallid Bat 12-17 48-60 353 13 V-Plecotus(P)-Corynorhinus (C )-rafinesquei/ Rafinesque’s Big-eared 7-13 40-46 280 14 V-P.C. Townsendii pallescens/Townsend’s Big-eared 5-13 X 39-47 297-320 Endangered Gray Myotis Big Brown 15 V-P.C.Townsendii ingens/Ozark Big-eared bat 7-13 39-47 270 16 V-Eptesicus Fuscus /Big Brown Bat 13-30 42-51 312-325 17 V-Lasiurus-(Hairy tailed) borealis/Eastern Red Bat 10-15 35-45X 312 18 V-Lasiurus (hairy tailed) cinereus/Hoary Bat 20-35 46-58 400 19 V-Lasiurus (Hairy tailed)/Seminole Bat X 10-15 35-45X 300 20 V-Nycticelus Humeralis Evening Bat 5-15 X 33-39X 260-300 21 V-Pipistrellus Hesperus/Canyon Bat was W. Pipistrelle 3-6 X 27-33 190X 22 V- Pipistrellus-Perimyotis Subflavus Tri-Colored Bat was E. Pipistrelle X 4-6 X 31-35X 235±15X Additional bats from BCI list for Oklahoma Myotis-Ciliolabrum/Western Small-Footed Myotis 4-5 X 30-36X 242 Silvered Haired Myotis-Melanorhinus Myotis/ Small-footed Dark-nosed Myotis 3-7 X 30-36X 210-250X Keen’s Myotis MyotisLucifugus-Occultus Myotis/Arizona Myotis 7-9 36-41 190-239X V-Lasiurus blossevillii/Western (Desert) Red Bat 9-12 35-45X 312 Additonal bats from Natureserve.org Myotinae-Myotis-septentrionalis-Northern Long-eared Myotis 6-9 35-38 230-260 V-Plecotus Corynorhinus townsendii /Townsend’s Big-eared 5-13 X 39-48 297-320 Make visual assessment color, fur texture, shape size of nose, ears, head put red X to all that look similar, measure and weigh check the rest see which ones check across. Include your comments below the one with X across closest match additional measurements are in the Book “Bats of Oklahoma” if more than one checks across Eastern Red Bat Comments Eastern Small-footed (Most common Several Myotis fit but the 3 colors on the bat identifies this one. The above pictures are from 2 bats Myotis(Leibii) Tulsa Rehab) received in Sept 2011 Owasso & Muskogee Photos from Merlin D.Tuttle Bat Conservation Big Free-tailed International Little Brown Bat Hoary Bat Tri-colored Bat Mexican(Brazilian) Free- Bat Canyon Bat was Batcon.org Western Pepistrelle was E Pepistrelle tailed Bat FEWERR.ORG Website http://fewerr.org The foundation for Environmental & Wildlife- Email [email protected] Education, Research & Rehab Newsgroup http://groups.yahoo.com/group.BatResQ 7822 S 69 E Pl, Tulsa, Ok 74133 Movies produced http://www.youtube.com/radarfoxbat 918-493-4943 Facebook http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=700044097&ref=ts Oklahoma’ s 2 2 S p e c i e s o f B a t s (according to O k Conservation Dept.) Pallid Bat Endangered Cave Myotis Yuma Myotis Evening Bat Seminole Bat Indiana Bat Rafinesque Big Southeastern Myotis Eared Bat Identification Worksheet Family/Tribe/Genus/Species/subspecies/common names WEIGHT FORE WING 1st check visual items Face Ears & Nose closest match X GRAMS ARMS SPAN MM 2nd compare physical measurements -> MM Specimen # RH82LBA1-11 X 7.4-8.8 35 220 1 Molossidae-Nyctinomops Macrotis- Big Free-Tailed Bat 24-30 58-64 426 2 Molossidae-Tadarida Brasiliensis Mexican (Brazili8an) Free-Tailed Bat 11-14 36-46 301 Endangered 3 Myotinae(M)-Myotis-Austroriparius/South Eastern Myotis 5-7 36-41 254 Western Small-footed Townsendii 4 Myotinae -Myotis-Grisescens/Gray Myotis 7.9-13.5 40-46 275-300 Myotis Ozark Big 5 Myotinae -Myotis-Keen’s(Keenii) Myotis 4 - 6 35-38X 200-260X Eared Bat 6 Myotinae -Myotis-Leibii/Eastern Small-Footed Myotis 4.1-5.5 30-36X 212-248X 7 Myotinae -Myotis-Lucifugus/Little Brown Bat X 7-9 X 34-41X 190-239X 8 Myotinae -Myotis-Sodalis/Indiana Myotis X 7.1-7.5X 35-41X 240-267 9 Myotinae -Myotis-Valifer/Cave Myotis 15 37-47 296 10 Myotinae -Myotis-Yumanensis/Yuma Myotis 4-6 32-38X 225X 11 Myotinae-Lasionycteris-Noctivagans /Silver Haired Bat 8-12 X 37-44 289 12 Vespertilionidae(V)- Antrozous pallidus/ Pallid Bat 12-17 48-60 353 13 V-Plecotus(P)-Corynorhinus (C )-rafinesquei/ Rafinesque’s Big-eared 7-13 X 40-46 280 14 V-P.C.
Recommended publications
  • Eastern Small-Footed Myotis (Myotis Leibii)
    ========================================================================== Current Status and Conservation Strategy for the Eastern Small-footed Myotis (Myotis leibii) October 2001 Technical Report #00-19 =========================================================================== Current Status and Conservation Strategy for the Eastern Small-footed Myotis (Myotis leibii) Prepared by: Sandra Y. Erdle and Christopher S. Hobson for: The George Washington and Jefferson National Forests Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation Division of Natural Heritage 217 Governor Street Richmond, Virginia 23219 (804) 786-7951 Technical Report #00-19 This document may be cited as follows: Erdle, S. Y., and C. S. Hobson. 2001. Current status and conservation strategy for the eastern small-footed myotis (Myotis leibii). Natural Heritage Technical Report # 00-19. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond, VA. 17 pp + appendices. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation programs, activities, and employment opportunities are available to all people regardless of race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, national origin, or political affiliation. An equal opportunity/affirmative action employer. Current status and conservation strategy: Myotis leibii (October 2001) 2 CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . ii INTRODUCTION. 1 LIFE HISTORY AND ECOLOGY . 2 Taxonomy . 2 General Characteristics . 2 Distribution and Abundance . 2 Conservation Status . 4 Summer Ecology and Behavior . 4 Winter Ecology and Behavior . 5 Ecologic and Economic Importance . 5 Ontogeny and Reproduction . 6 Predators . 7 DISCUSSION AND MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS . 7 CONSERVATION AND PROTECTION . 9 Recommendations . 9 Information Needs . 10 PERTINENT LITERATURE . 12 APPENDICES . 18 Appendix A - Survey Form - List of Personal Contacts and Plan Reviewers - Responses to Survey Form Appendix B - Explanation of the Natural Heritage Ranking System Appendix C - Poster Abstract (American Society of Mammalogists) FIGURES Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Publications Museum of Texas Tech University Number 63 18 September 2014
    Special Publications Museum of Texas Tech University Number 63 18 September 2014 List of Recent Land Mammals of Mexico, 2014 José Ramírez-Pulido, Noé González-Ruiz, Alfred L. Gardner, and Joaquín Arroyo-Cabrales.0 Front cover: Image of the cover of Nova Plantarvm, Animalivm et Mineralivm Mexicanorvm Historia, by Francisci Hernández et al. (1651), which included the first list of the mammals found in Mexico. Cover image courtesy of the John Carter Brown Library at Brown University. SPECIAL PUBLICATIONS Museum of Texas Tech University Number 63 List of Recent Land Mammals of Mexico, 2014 JOSÉ RAMÍREZ-PULIDO, NOÉ GONZÁLEZ-RUIZ, ALFRED L. GARDNER, AND JOAQUÍN ARROYO-CABRALES Layout and Design: Lisa Bradley Cover Design: Image courtesy of the John Carter Brown Library at Brown University Production Editor: Lisa Bradley Copyright 2014, Museum of Texas Tech University This publication is available free of charge in PDF format from the website of the Natural Sciences Research Laboratory, Museum of Texas Tech University (nsrl.ttu.edu). The authors and the Museum of Texas Tech University hereby grant permission to interested parties to download or print this publication for personal or educational (not for profit) use. Re-publication of any part of this paper in other works is not permitted without prior written permission of the Museum of Texas Tech University. This book was set in Times New Roman and printed on acid-free paper that meets the guidelines for per- manence and durability of the Committee on Production Guidelines for Book Longevity of the Council on Library Resources. Printed: 18 September 2014 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Special Publications of the Museum of Texas Tech University, Number 63 Series Editor: Robert J.
    [Show full text]
  • Yuma Myotis Myotis Yumanensis
    Wyoming Species Account Yuma Myotis Myotis yumanensis REGULATORY STATUS USFWS: No special status USFS R2: No special status USFS R4: No special status Wyoming BLM: No special status State of Wyoming: Nongame Wildlife CONSERVATION RANKS USFWS: No special status WGFD: NSS4 (Cb), Tier III WYNDD: G5, S1 Wyoming Contribution: LOW IUCN: Least Concern STATUS AND RANK COMMENTS Yuma Myotis (Myotis yumanensis) has no additional regulatory status or conservation rank considerations beyond those listed above. NATURAL HISTORY Taxonomy: There are six recognized subspecies of Yuma Myotis 1. Because of distributional uncertainties, it is unclear which subspecies occur in Wyoming. In general, the subspecies M. y. yumanensis occurs in the southern Rocky Mountains, while M. y. sociabilis occurs in the northern Rocky Mountains 1, 2. Description: Yuma Myotis may be difficult to identify in the field, even by skilled observers. The species is a small vespertilionid bat, but medium in size among bats in the genus Myotis. Pelage color is variable across the species’ range. Dorsal fur is short, dull, and varies from gray and brown to pale tan in color. Ventral fur is lighter in color, white or buffy. The ears, wing, and tail membranes are pale brown to gray 1. Males and females are identical in appearance, but females may be significantly larger than males in some populations 1. Juveniles are similar in appearance but can be differentiated from adults by the lack of ossified joints in the phalanges for the first summer 3, 4. Yuma Myotis is similar in appearance to other co-occurring Myotis species. Yuma Myotis can be distinguished from Long-legged Myotis (M.
    [Show full text]
  • A Recent Bat Survey Reveals Bukit Barisan Selatan Landscape As A
    A Recent Bat Survey Reveals Bukit Barisan Selatan Landscape as a Chiropteran Diversity Hotspot in Sumatra Author(s): Joe Chun-Chia Huang, Elly Lestari Jazdzyk, Meyner Nusalawo, Ibnu Maryanto, Maharadatunkamsi, Sigit Wiantoro, and Tigga Kingston Source: Acta Chiropterologica, 16(2):413-449. Published By: Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3161/150811014X687369 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.3161/150811014X687369 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Acta Chiropterologica, 16(2): 413–449, 2014 PL ISSN 1508-1109 © Museum and Institute of Zoology PAS doi: 10.3161/150811014X687369 A recent
    [Show full text]
  • INDIANA BAT Scientific Name: Myotis Sodalis Miller and Allen Other
    Common Name: INDIANA BAT Scientific Name: Myotis sodalis Miller and Allen Other Commonly Used Names: Indiana myotis, social myotis Previously Used Names: none Family: Vespertilionidae Rarity Ranks: G2/S1 State Legal Status: Endangered Federal Legal Status: Endangered Description: The dorsal hair of the Indiana bat is dark chestnut gray to pinkish gray, darker at the base, and lacks luster. Individual hairs have three bands of color. The ears and wing membranes also have a flat coloration that does not contrast with the fur. The underfur is somewhat lighter colored with a pinkish cast. The hairs on the relatively small (9 mm, inch) feet are short and inconspicuous and the calcar (a spur of cartilage arising from inner side of ankle and running along part of outer wing ) is keeled. The total length is 41 - 49 mm (1 - 1 inches), the forearm length is 35 - 41 mm (1 -1 inches), the wingspread is 24 - 27 cm (9 - 10 inches), and the weight is about 5 - 8 grams (about ¼ ounce). Similar Species: In general, the Indiana bat closely resembles the little brown bat (Mysotis lucifugus). Characters of the latter that help distinguish it are a slightly larger (10mm) foot, toe hairs that extend beyond the knuckles, a keel-less calcar, and burnished bronze hair tips. Habitat: Indiana bats gather in large groups in suitable caves to hibernate, more than 85% of the population in just nine caves in Indiana, Missouri, and Kentucky. These bats need winter caves with a stable temperature of 4 - 8°C (39 - 46°F) that contain standing water which maintains relative humidity above 74%.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B References
    Final Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement and Preliminary Section 4(f) Evaluation Appendix B, References July 2021 Federal Aid No. 999-M(161)S ADOT Project No. 999 SW 0 M5180 01P I-11 Corridor Final Tier 1 EIS Appendix B, References 1 This page intentionally left blank. July 2021 Project No. M5180 01P / Federal Aid No. 999-M(161)S I-11 Corridor Final Tier 1 EIS Appendix B, References 1 ADEQ. 2002. Groundwater Protection in Arizona: An Assessment of Groundwater Quality and 2 the Effectiveness of Groundwater Programs A.R.S. §49-249. Arizona Department of 3 Environmental Quality. 4 ADEQ. 2008. Ambient Groundwater Quality of the Pinal Active Management Area: A 2005-2006 5 Baseline Study. Open File Report 08-01. Arizona Department of Environmental Quality Water 6 Quality Division, Phoenix, Arizona. June 2008. 7 https://legacy.azdeq.gov/environ/water/assessment/download/pinal_ofr.pdf. 8 ADEQ. 2011. Arizona State Implementation Plan: Regional Haze Under Section 308 of the 9 Federal Regional Haze Rule. Air Quality Division, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, 10 Phoenix, Arizona. January 2011. https://www.resolutionmineeis.us/documents/adeq-sip- 11 regional-haze-2011. 12 ADEQ. 2013a. Ambient Groundwater Quality of the Upper Hassayampa Basin: A 2003-2009 13 Baseline Study. Open File Report 13-03, Phoenix: Water Quality Division. 14 https://legacy.azdeq.gov/environ/water/assessment/download/upper_hassayampa.pdf. 15 ADEQ. 2013b. Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Fact Sheet: Construction 16 General Permit for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Construction Activity. Arizona 17 Department of Environmental Quality. June 3, 2013. 18 https://static.azdeq.gov/permits/azpdes/cgp_fact_sheet_2013.pdf.
    [Show full text]
  • Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) from Taiwan and Adjacent China
    Zootaxa 3920 (1): 301–342 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2015 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3920.2.6 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8B991675-0C48-40D4-87D2-DACA524D17C2 Molecular phylogeny and morphological revision of Myotis bats (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) from Taiwan and adjacent China MANUEL RUEDI1,5, GÁBOR CSORBA2, LIANG- KONG LIN3 & CHENG-HAN CHOU3,4 1Department of Mammalogy and Ornithology, Natural History Museum of Geneva, Route de Malagnou 1, BP 6434, 1211 Geneva (6), Switzerland. E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Zoology, Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest, Baross u. 13., H-1088. E-mail: [email protected] 3Laboratory of Wildlife Ecology, Department of Biology, Tunghai University, Taichung, Taiwan 407, R.O.C. E-mail: [email protected] 4Division of Zoology, Endemic Species Research Institute, Nantou, Taiwan 552, R.O.C. E-mail: [email protected] 5Corresponding author Table of contents Abstract . 301 Introduction . 302 Material and methods . 310 Results . 314 Discussion . 319 Systematic account . 319 Submyotodon latirostris (Kishida, 1932) . 319 Myotis fimbriatus (Peters, 1870) . 321 Myotis laniger (Peters, 1870) . 322 Myotis secundus sp. n. 324 Myotis soror sp. n. 327 Myotis frater Allen, 1923 . 331 Myotis formosus (Hodgson, 1835) . 334 Myotis rufoniger (Tomes, 1858) . 335 Biogeography and conclusions . 336 Key to the Myotinae from Taiwan and adjacent mainland China . 337 Acknowledgments . 337 References . 338 Abstract In taxonomic accounts, three species of Myotis have been traditionally reported to occur on the island of Taiwan: Watase’s bat (M.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammal Watching in Northern Mexico Vladimir Dinets
    Mammal watching in Northern Mexico Vladimir Dinets Seldom visited by mammal watchers, Northern Mexico is a fascinating part of the world with a diverse mammal fauna. In addition to its many endemics, many North American species are easier to see here than in USA, while some tropical ones can be seen in unusual habitats. I travelled there a lot (having lived just across the border for a few years), but only managed to visit a small fraction of the number of places worth exploring. Many generations of mammologists from USA and Mexico have worked there, but the knowledge of local mammals is still a bit sketchy, and new discoveries will certainly be made. All information below is from my trips in 2003-2005. The main roads are better and less traffic-choked than in other parts of the country, but the distances are greater, so any traveler should be mindful of fuel (expensive) and highway tolls (sometimes ridiculously high). In theory, toll roads (carretera quota) should be paralleled by free roads (carretera libre), but this isn’t always the case. Free roads are often narrow, winding, and full of traffic, but sometimes they are good for night drives (toll roads never are). All guidebooks to Mexico I’ve ever seen insist that driving at night is so dangerous, you might as well just kill yourself in advance to avoid the horror. In my experience, driving at night is usually safer, because there is less traffic, you see the headlights of upcoming cars before making the turn, and other drivers blink their lights to warn you of livestock on the road ahead.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of Mammals at Walnut Canyon, Wupatki, and Sunset Crater National Monuments
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Inventory of Mammals at Walnut Canyon, Wupatki, and Sunset Crater National Monuments Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/SCPN/NRTR–2009/278 ON THE COVER: Top: Wupatki National Monument; bottom left: bobcat (Lynx rufus); bottom right: Wupatki pocket mouse (Perogna- thus amplus cineris) at Wupatki National Monument. Photos courtesy of U.S. Geological Survey/Charles Drost. Inventory of Mammals at Walnut Canyon, Wupatki, and Sunset Crater National Monuments Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/SCPN/NRTR—2009/278 Author Charles Drost U.S. Geological Survey Southwest Biological Science Center 2255 N. Gemini Drive Flagstaff, AZ 86001 Editing and Design Jean Palumbo National Park Service, Southern Colorado Plateau Network Northern Arizona University Flagstaff, Arizona December 2009 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Program Center publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Technical Report Series is used to disseminate results of scientific studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series provides contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Colorado River Bat Monitoring Protocol
    LOWER COLORADO RIVER BAT MONITORING PROTOCOL Patricia Brown, Ph.D. January 2006 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND European man has drastically changed the natural habitat of the Lower Colorado River (LCR) over the past 150 years. Dams for power, flood control and water export; bank stabilization and channelization have altered the flow and flood patterns, salinity and plant communities of the LCR. The destruction of the native vegetation, most notably the cottonwood/willow riparian, and its replacement by exotics, especially salt cedar continues unabated. Over the past 50 years, declines have been observed in some bat species, such as the cave myotis (Myotis velifer) and Townsend’s big-eared bat (Corynorhinus townsendii), that were at one time relatively abundant along the LCR. Large deposits of the distinctive guano of these colonial species are found in abandoned mines that border the LCR, although the bats are now absent or present in very small numbers. Only four maternity colonies of cave myotis and one maternity colony of Corynorhinus are now known along the LCR. The Arizona myotis (Myotis occultus) appears to have disappeared from the LCR, with the last museum specimen collected in 1945. The type locality for this species was Ft. Mojave north of Needles. One hypothesis for the decline of some bat species is the removal and replacement of native floodplain vegetation that supported the insect diets of these bats. Another is the heavy pesticide spraying in agricultural areas (conducted principally at night) that directly reduces the preybase and indirectly poisons the bats. A third possible cause is the disturbance of roosts of colonial bat species by the increased resident and recreational human population along the Colorado River.
    [Show full text]
  • Indiana Bat Habitat Requirements
    Section II-F Bat Habitat Conservation Priorities in Missouri Indiana Bat, Northern Long-Eared Bat, and Gray Bat NOTE: The Missouri Heritage Database, adapted for NRCS Field Office Technical Guide use, will be consulted for potential impacts to the Indiana Bat, Northern Long- Eared Bat, and Gray Bat. Please refer questions regarding these Bat Habitat Conservation Priorities to the Area Biologist. Area staff should direct questions to the State Wildlife Biologist. Indiana Bat The Indiana Bat (Myotis sodalis) is a federal and state listed endangered species. When the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) provides technical or financial assistance to landowners, habitat for this species must be considered and evaluated by NRCS staff that has completed the joint agency workshop, “U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service/NRCS Coordination for the Conservation of the Indiana Bat in Missouri.” Biology of the Indiana Bat From late fall through winter, Indiana bats in Missouri hibernate in caves in the Ozark Region. During the spring and summer, the bats utilize living, injured (e.g. split trunks and broken limbs from lightening strikes or wind), dead or dying trees for roosting throughout the state. Indiana bat roost trees tend to be greater than 9 inches (dbh) with loose or exfoliating bark. Large trees (greater than 20 inches dbh) are preferred. Most important are the structural characteristics that provide adequate space for bats to roost. Preferred roost sites are located in forest openings, at the forest edge, or where the overstory canopy allows some sunlight exposure to the roost tree which is usually within 0.6 miles of water.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Guidance for Indiana Bat (Myotis Sodalis)
    Conservation Guidance for Indiana Bat (Myotis sodalis). Henning, Bridget; Hinz Jr., Leon C; Kath, Joe INHS Technical Report 2017 (26) Prepared for Illinois Department of Natural Resources, State Wildlife Initiative Grants Program Issue Date: 8/30/2017 Unrestricted, for immediate release Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign Mark R. Ryan, Executive Director Illinois Natural History Survey Leellen Solter, Interim Director 1816 South Oak Street Champaign, IL 61820 217-333-6830 Illinois Natural History Survey has undertaken a project producing documents that provide conservation guidance for listed species in Illinois for the Illinois Department of Natural Resources. The project is titled: Conservation Guidance for Species in Greatest Need of Conservation (SGNC) T- 96-R-001. The primary purpose of guidance documents is to provide various project developers/land managers with information on the species, how their actions may impact the species, and how they can minimize/mitigate/monitor those impacts. In addition, the documents may be useful for identifying research needs to direct various funds, as a first step towards recovery planning, or for informing the general public. We intend the documents to be comprehensive and inclusive of scientific and experiential knowledge of the species and its conservation. The documents incorporate information on current conservation efforts, conservation opportunities and research needs. Interviews with stakeholders were held to identify information that should be included in conservation guidance documents. We prioritized document production for species that were frequently the subject of Incidental Take Authorizations or were consulted on in the IDNR’s EcoCat program. Initial literature reviews was conducted to produce first draft documents.
    [Show full text]