London Map Pdf Tfl

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

London Map Pdf Tfl London map pdf tfl Continue TfL Rail Reading service shown open - Chiltern paddington service has been changed to West Ealing's New Blackfriars layout' zone 8, added to Swanley and Goblin, shown open - now with a weekend service on Liverpool Street via Stratford. - London's Midland Bushy stop added and alignment changes to the Greenford branch stops at West Ealing South East Cannon Street service diverging short of London Bridge TfL rail closures as Goblin showed the closed Crossrail renamed Elizabeth Line and the Northern Line Battersea extension added. GWR added from the Reigate Gatwick Express has changed from brown to black exchange cones removed from emirates Air Line Goblin changed to a hatched London Bridge line layout changed the new zone 23'added. FGW becomes GWR. Well done pitcher, beautifully done. TfLs wish a list of routes it would add to london Overground. Not schematic, but this geographically accurate map was widely regarded as a new breakthrough, so it's worth it as well. Not so accurately, though. It seems to remember that this was around a long time ago... The only difference seems to be the different presentations of Highbury - Dalston. Shows London overground Surrey berths - Clapham Junction open. Shows DLR Stratford International expansion open. The Metro map from March 2019 Part of the series on TheLondon Underground Overview History Infrastructure Stations Popular Culture Map London transport portalvte The Tube Map (sometimes called The London Underground Map or TfL Services Map) is a schematic transport map of the lines, stations and services of the London Underground, known as the Tube, hence the name of the map. The first schematic map of the metro was developed by Harry Beck in 1931. It has since been expanded to include more London public transport systems including docklands Light Railway, London Overground, TfL Rail, Tramlink and the Emirates Air Line cable car. As a schematic diagram, not geographical locations are shown, but relative positions of stations, lines, connecting stations and tariff zones. Basic design concepts have been widely adopted for other similar maps around the world, as well as for maps of other types of transport networks and even conceptual schemes. A regularly updated version of the map is available on the official Transport for London website. In 2006, the metro map was recognized as one of the top 10 British design icons, which included Concorde, Mini, Supermarine Spitfire, K2 phone booth, World Wide Web and AEC Routemaster bus. The maps were generally not schematic and were simply a line superimposed on a normal map of the city. There was no services of companies or any cooperation in advertising. In 1907, the Evening News newspaper ordered a pocket card London Evening News Tube Map. It was the first map showing all the equal-weight lines given to each line, and it was the first map that used a different color for each line. Another early combined map was published in 1908 by the London Underground Electric Railways Company (UERL) in conjunction with four other underground railway companies that used the Underground brand as part of a common advertising factor. Map of Underground Lines, 1908 Map showed eight routes - four operated by UERL and one of each of the four other companies: UERL Lines: Bakerloo Railway - Brown Hampstead Railway - Indigo Piccadilly Railway - Yellow District Railway - Green Other Lines: Central London Railway - Blue City and South London Railway - Black Great North and City Railway - Black Great Northern and City Railways - Orange Metropolitan Railway - Red because for sufficient clarity the limbs of the county and metropolitan lines that must be omitted, and therefore the complete circuit network was not provided. The problem of rooting has remained for almost half a century. Although all the western branches of the District and Piccadilly Lines were incorporated for the first time in 1933 with the first proper Harry Beck Metro map, part of the Metropolitan line for Rickmansworth did not appear until 1938, and the eastern end of the district line did not appear until the mid-1950s. The route map continued to evolve and was produced in various formats and artistic styles until 1920, when the first geographical backstory was omitted on a map developed by Macdonald Gill. This freed the design to provide greater flexibility in positioning lines and stations. Routes have become more stylized, but the location has remained, mainly, geographical in nature. The 1932 edition was the last geographical map published before the introduction of beck's schematic map. Bec Maps First schematic map of London's rapid transit network was developed by Harry Beck in 1931. He was an employee of the London Underground who realized that since the railway runs mostly underground, the physical locations of the stations were largely unrelated to the traveller, wanting to know how to get from one station to another; only the topology of the route matters. This approach is similar to that of electric circuits, although they were not the inspiration for Beck's map. His colleagues pointed out similarities, however, and he once produced a joke map with stations replaced by electric chain symbols and names, with terminology such as Bakerlite for the Bakerloo line. To this end, Beck has developed map with c Direct segments connecting them and the Thames; and lines that only run vertically, horizontally or diagonally 45 degrees. To make the map clearer and emphasize the connections, Beck is differentiated between conventional stations marked with tick marks and diamond-marked interchange stations. The London Underground was initially sceptical of its proposal, as it was an unfinished project of free time and was pre-presented to the public in a small brochure in 1933. However, it immediately became popular, and Metro used topological maps to illustrate the network ever since. Despite the difficulty of creating the map, Beck was paid only ten guineas for the work and design of the card edition (five guineas for the poster). After initial success, he continued to develop the Tube map until 1960, the only (and unpopular) edition of The 1939 Hans Scheger, which was the only exception. At the same time, in addition to placing new lines and stations, Beck constantly changed the design, for example, changed the symbol of the exchange from diamond to circle and changed the colors of the Central Line line from orange to red and Bakerloo line from red to brown. Beck's final design, in 1960, bears a strong resemblance to the current map. Beck lived in Finchley, North London, and one of his maps is still preserved on the south platform at Finchley Central Station, on the Northern Line. In 1997, Beck's value was posthumously recognized, and by 2013 this statement was printed on each Tube map: This diagram is an evolution of the original design conceived in 1931 by Harry Beck. After Beck Unofficial map of the rate area 1, which shows the approximate geographical location of stations and lines. By 1960, Beck had come across an advertising officer for the Met, Harold Hutchison, who himself was not a designer, but in the same year developed his own version of the subway map. It removed the smoothed corners of Beck's design and created some highly-close areas (most notably around Liverpool Street Station), and the lines were generally less straight. However, Hutchison also introduced interchange symbols (circles only for metro, squares for connections with British Rail's main service lines) that were black and allowed multiple lines across them, unlike Beck, who used one circle for each line at the interchange, colored according to the corresponding line. In 1964, the design of the map was adopted by Paul Garbutt, who, like Beck, created the map in his spare time because of his dislike of Hutchison's design. Garbutt's card restored curves and curves on the chart, but retained Hutchison's black interchange circles, but the squares were replaced by circles with a dot inside. Garbutt continued to produce underground maps for at least another 20 years. Pipe cards no longer bear the designer's name in when the elements of the map then bore a very strong resemblance to today's map. While the standard Metro map avoided the presentation of most basic services, the new map, issued in 1973, was the first to depict the Subway and above-ground rail services in a schematic style that closely matched Beck's projects. This version was created by Tim Demuth from the London Office of Transport Advertising and was co- sponsored by British Rail and London Transport. The Demut card did not replace the standard subway map, but continued to be published as an additional resource, later known as the London Connections map. Some changes have been made to the map over the years. Later projects included changes to the network, such as Docklands Light Railway and the extension of the Jubilee Line. The map has also been expanded to include routes overseen by Transport for London, such as TfL Rail, and mark metro stops that connect to national rail services, links to airports and river services. In some cases, stations within walking distance are being shown, often with the distance between them, such as the distance of Fenchurch Street from Tower Hill (the evolution of the pedestrian route between the bank and the monument stations that was once marked noticeably on the map). In addition, the current map also includes non-step access notations. In addition, travel payment zones have been added to help passengers judge the cost of the trip. However, the map remains true to Beck's original scheme, and many other transport systems use schematic maps to represent their services, which are probably inspired by Beck.
Recommended publications
  • Geometric Distortion of Schematic Network Maps
    Geometric distortion of schematic network maps Bernhard Jenny The London Underground map is one of the most popular maps of modern times, depicting the lines and stations of London’s rail system as a schematic diagram. Its present design is still very similar to Harry Beck’s original layout of 1933. The geometry is deliberately distorted to improve readability and facilitate way finding in the network. This short paper presents the visual results of a cartometric analysis of the current London Underground map. The analysis was carried out using MapAnalyst, a specialized program for computing distortion grids and other types of visualizations that illustrate the geometric accuracy and distortion of maps. The described method could help designers of schematic maps to verify their design against the “geometric truth”, and guide their choice among different design options. The London Underground map the globe, but also had an enduring influence on other areas of graphic information design. London Transport, of The famous London Underground map shows the Thames course, continues improving and extending the diagram and named metro stations with railway tracks as straight map, while still following Harry Beck’s initial design. line segments. Strictly speaking, it is not a map that aims at a metrically accurate depiction of the network, but it is Besides the ingenious layout of the railway lines at rather a diagram that accentuates the topological relations 45- and 90-degree angles, a purposeful enlargement of the of Underground stations. Henry “Harry” C. Beck produced central portion of the network is the main characteristic of the first sketch for the famous diagram in 1931.
    [Show full text]
  • Tfl Corporate Archives
    TfL Corporate Archives ‘MAPPING LONDON’ TfL C orporate Archives is part of Information Governance, General C ounsel TfL Corporate Archives The TfL Corporate Archives acts as the custodian of the corporate memory of TfL and its predecessors, with responsibility for collecting, conserving, maintaining and providing access to the historical archives of the organisation. These archives chart the development of the organisation and the decision making processes. The Archives provides advice and assistance to researchers from both within and outside of the business and seeks to promote the archive to as wide an audience as possible, while actively collecting both physical and digital material and adding personal stories to the archive. The Archives are part of Information Governance, within General Counsel. • “Mapping London” is intended as an introduction to the development and use of maps and mapping techniques by TfL and its predecessors. • The following pages highlight key documents arranged according to theme, as well as providing further brief information. These can be used as a starting point for further research if desired • This document is adapted from a guide that originally accompanied an internal exhibition Tube Map Development: Individual Companies • Prior to 1906, the individual railway companies produced their own maps and there was no combined map of the various lines. • The companies were effectively all in competition with each other and so the focus was steadfastly on the route of the individual line, where it went, and why it was of particular use to you. • Even when combined maps of a sort began to appear, following the establishment of the Underground Electric Railways Group, the emphasis often fell upon a particular line.
    [Show full text]
  • Labyrinth Teacher Pack Part 1: Introduction Key Stages 1–5
    Labyrinth Teacher Pack Part 1: Introduction Key Stages 1–5 Visit http://art.gov.uk/labyrinth/learning to download Part 2: Classroom Activities, Cover Lessons & Resources 1 Foreword This two-part resource, produced in partnership with A New Direction, has been devised for primary- and secondary-school teachers, with particular relevance to those in reach of the Tube, as an introduction to Labyrinth, a project commissioned from artist Mark Wallinger by Art on the Underground to celebrate the 150th anniversary of the London Tube. The aim is to inform and inspire teachers about this Visit http://art.gov.uk/labyrinth/learning to special project, for which Wallinger has designed a download the Teacher Pack, Part 2: Classroom unique artwork, each bearing a labyrinth design, for Activities, Cover Lesson & Resources This pack all 270 stations on the Tube network. We hope that contains a variety of classroom-activity suggestions the resource will promote knowledge and for different subjects that can be used as a springboard enthusiasm that will then be imparted to the children for teachers to devise their own projects. Key stage and their families throughout the capital and beyond, suggestions are given, although many of these and will encourage them to explore the Underground activities can be adapted for a variety of year groups, network on an exciting hunt for labyrinths. depending upon the ability of the students involved. This Teacher Pack, Part 1 of the resource, provides Details are also given about the Labyrinth Schools introductory information about the project Labyrinth Poster Competition, the winners of which will have and gives background details about the artist.
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematical Aspects of Public Transportation Networks
    Mathematical Aspects of Public Transportation Networks Niels Lindner July 9, 2018 July 9, 2018 1 / 48 Reminder Dates I July 12: no tutorial (excursion) I July 16: evaluation of Problem Set 10 and Test Exam I July 19: no tutorial I July 19/20: block seminar on shortest paths I August 7 (Tuesday): 1st exam I October 8 (Monday): 2nd exam Exams I location: ZIB seminar room I start time: 10.00am I duration: 60 minutes I permitted aids: one A4 sheet with notes July 9, 2018 2 / 48 Chapter 6 Metro Map Drawing x6.1 Metro Maps July 9, 2018 3 / 48 x6.1 Metro Maps Berlin, 1921 (Pharus-Plan) alt-berlin.info July 9, 2018 4 / 48 x6.1 Metro Maps Berlin, 1913 (Hochbahngesellschaft) Sammlung Mauruszat, u-bahn-archiv.de July 9, 2018 5 / 48 x6.1 Metro Maps Berlin, 1933 (BVG) Sammlung Mauruszat, u-bahn-archiv.de July 9, 2018 6 / 48 x6.1 Metro Maps London, 1926 (London Underground) commons.wikimedia.org July 9, 2018 7 / 48 x6.1 Metro Maps London, 1933 (Harry Beck) July 9, 2018 8 / 48 x6.1 Metro Maps Plaque at Finchley Central station Nick Cooper, commons.wikimedia.org July 9, 2018 9 / 48 x6.1 Metro Maps Berlin, 1968 (BVG-West) Sammlung Mauruszat, u-bahn-archiv.de July 9, 2018 10 / 48 x6.1 Metro Maps Berlin, 2018 (BVG) Wittenberge RE6 RB55 Kremmen Stralsund/Rostock RE5 RB12 Templin Stadt Groß Schönebeck (Schorfheide) RB27 Stralsund/Schwedt (Oder) RE3 RE66 Szczecin (Stettin) RB24 Eberswalde Legende Barrierefrei durch Berlin Key to symbols Step-free access Sachsenhausen (Nordb) RB27 Schmachtenhagen 7 6 S-Bahn-/U-Bahn : Aufzug Oranienburg 1 RB20 : Wandlitzsee
    [Show full text]
  • Beck to the Future: Time to Leave It Alone
    ICC2013 Dresden Beck to the Future: time to leave it alone William Cartwright1 and Kenneth Field2 1Geospatial Science, RMIT University, Melbourne Victoria 3001, Australia 2Esri Inc, 380 New York Street, Redlands, CA 92373-8100, USA Abstract When one thinks of a map depicting London, generally the image that appears is of that of the map designed by Beck. It has become a design icon. Beck’s map, designed in 1933, and first made available to London commuters in 1933, has become the image of the geography of London and, generally, the mental map that defines how London ‘works’. As a communication tool, Beck’s map does work. It is an effective communicator of the London Underground train network and the distribution of stations and connections between one line and others. Whilst it is acknowledged that the geography of London is distorted, it still retains the status of ‘the’ map of London. The paper asserts that Beck’s map is over-used. It has suffered years of abuse and that has diluted its own place in cartographic history. The first component of the paper begins by providing a brief background of Beck and his London Underground map. This is followed by an outline of the three principle ways in which Beck’s ideas have been used. It then considers if, as previously stated, this map is a design icon or classic design. This is followed by a review of the attributes that appear to make it cartographically functional. Once these elements have been established the paper further reviews how, even if the geography is depicted in a way that distorts the true geography of London, users really don’t care, and they consume the map as a tool for moving about London, underground.
    [Show full text]
  • Beck's Representation of London's Underground System: Map Or Diagram?
    GSR_2 RMIT University, Melbourne December, 2012 Beck's representation of London's Underground system: map or diagram? William Cartwright School of Mathematical and Geospatial Sciences, RMIT University, Australia Email: [email protected] Abstract Prior to 1932, maps provided by London Transport clung closely to the geography above ground, irrespective of the fact that the system being represented was a different geography altogether. In 1931, Electrical Draughtsman, Harry Beck designed a completely new representation of the Underground, which ignored the geography aboveground and concentrated on ‘mapping’ the lines, stations and interchanges. His design was tested by London Transport in 1932, with a trial print run. It was an immediate success! By distorting geography Beck made the product more usable and an effective communicator about how to move about (under) London. Quite recently, many from the design community have questioned whether Beck’s representation of London’s underground rail system is a map or a diagram. The majority of articles on this topic come from the design community, and they generally support the view that Beck’s product is a diagram, rather than a map. Very little comment on this debate comes from the cartographic community. This paper considers, from a cartographic perspective, whether Beck’s representation of the London Underground is in fact a map. It provides the results of a survey, which canvassed the international cartography and design community about whether Beck's representation is a ‘map’ or a 'diagram'. The contribution is unashamedly made from the viewpoint of a cartographer. However, the analysis has been made in a rigorous and unbiased manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Tube Station Trivia Pdf, Epub, Ebook
    TUBE STATION TRIVIA PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Geoff Marshall | 112 pages | 10 Sep 2018 | Capital Transport Publishing | 9781854144317 | English | Middlesex, United Kingdom Tube Station Trivia PDF Book Barkingside Is the only station on the network with an ornate, medieval-style Hammerbeam Roof usually only used in great halls or cathedrals. Is a Grade 1 listed building, making station improvements considerably difficult. Difficult picqero Apr 29 04 plays. The Underground was funded entirely by private companies until the s. And to get from one to the other without walking would require a minimum of 10 stops and 3 changes. Despite their being 5 people aboard, and a toddler asleep in the top floor of the house, no-one was even injured. There are no Independent Premium comments yet - be the first to add your thoughts. Despite having three lines run through it, it only has one pair of tracks, making it one of the most intensely used parts of the network. When Becontree was first built in the interwar period, it was the largest housing estate in the world — and a railway station was built specifically for it. The first-ever day of public service was enjoyed by 40, passengers. In fact, he designed a great many stations in his time. The last manually operated doors on Tube trains replaced by air-operated doors were phased out in The longest escalator on the network is at Angel and is 60m long, with a vertical rise of Edward Johnston designed the font for the London Underground in Technically the oldest station on the network: the mainline station was built in , predating Baker Street by 24 years.
    [Show full text]
  • TTC SUBWAY MAP (AND HOW IT RUINS YOUR MOOD and MOVEMENT in the CITY) a Case Study and Redesign MPC MAJOR RESEARCH PAPER
    MAJOR RESEARCH PAPER THE “UGLY” TTC SUBWAY MAP (AND HOW IT RUINS YOUR MOOD AND MOVEMENT IN THE CITY) a case study and redesign MPC MAJOR RESEARCH PAPER THE “UGLY” TTC SUBWAY MAP (AND HOW IT RUINS YOUR MOOD AND MOVEMENT IN THE CITY) A CASE STUDY AND REDESIGN JOANNA SIDA LIU Dr. Matthew Tiessen The Major Research Paper is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Professional Communication Ryerson University Toronto, Ontario, Canada September 1, 2016 i. AUTHOR’S DECLARATION I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this Major Research Paper and the accompanying Research Poster. This is a true copy of the MRP and the research poster, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I authorize Ryerson University to lend this major research paper and/or poster to other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. I further authorize Ryerson University to reproduce this MRP and/or poster by photocopying or by other means, in total or in part, at the request of other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. I understand that my MRP and/or my MRP research poster may be made electronically available to the public. 3 ii. ABSTRACT The TTC subway was built in 1949 to resolve the traffic issues of that era, issues that have only since intensified. At the time, any underground transportation system was an impressive accomplishment in design, engineering, construction, and city planning. Today, those same accomplishments—left to stagnate, age, and become overburdened—have become outdated and—measured against contemporary designs—sometimes even ridiculed.
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Tube Map (May 2014)
    Tube map Special fares apply Epping Chesham Watford Junction Chalfont & Theydon Bois 9 Latimer 8 7 Watford High Street 8 7 6 5 Watford High Barnet Cockfosters Debden Amersham Bushey Chorleywood Croxley Totteridge & Whetstone Oakwood Loughton 6 Carpenders Park Buckhurst Hill Rickmansworth Moor Park Woodside Park Southgate Hatch End Roding Grange Northwood Mill Hill East West Finchley Arnos Grove Valley Hill 5 West Ruislip Northwood Edgware Hills Headstone Lane Stanmore 4 Bounds Green Chigwell Hillingdon Ruislip Harrow & Finchley Central Hainault Ruislip Manor Burnt Oak Pinner Wealdstone Canons Park Wood Green Woodford Uxbridge Ickenham Colindale East Finchley Fairlop Eastcote North Harrow Kenton Harringay South Woodford Queensbury Turnpike Lane Green Lanes Hendon Central Crouch 4 Barkingside Harrow- Northwick Preston Highgate Hill South Tottenham Snaresbrook Ruislip on-the-Hill Park Road Kingsbury Rayners Lane Brent Cross Seven Newbury Park Gardens Archway Manor House Blackhorse Gospel Sisters Road West South Kenton 3 Redbridge Harrow Golders Green Oak Hampstead Upper Holloway South Harrow Neasden Tottenham Walthamstow North Wembley Hampstead Heath Wanstead Gants South Ruislip Wembley Arsenal Hale Central Dollis Hill Tufnell Park Finsbury Hill Upminster Wembley Central Park Park Leytonstone Finchley Road Holloway Road Walthamstow Upminster Bridge Sudbury Hill Stonebridge Park Willesden Green & Frognal Kentish Leyton Leytonstone Town West Kentish Town Queen’s Road Midland Road High Road Belsize Park Hornchurch Northolt Harlesden Kilburn Highbury & Kensal Brondesbury Caledonian Road Islington Dalston Sudbury Town Rise Park Chalk Farm Kingsland Leyton Willesden Junction West Hampstead Camden Dagenham Stratford East Elm Park Road Hackney International Finchley Road Caledonian Central 3 Wanstead Park Brondesbury Camden Town Kensal Green Road & Canonbury Alperton Swiss Cottage 2 Barnsbury Dagenham Queen’s Park Kilburn South Mornington Dalston Junction Stratford St.
    [Show full text]
  • Night Tube and London Overground Map Operates on Friday and Saturday Nights
    Night Tube and London Overground map Operates on Friday and Saturday nights Loughton 5 High Barnet Cockfosters Night services operate on Totteridge & Whetstone Oakwood Buckhurst Hill 6 Woodside Park Southgate Friday and Saturday nights Woodford West Finchley Arnos Grove 5 Central line Edgware 4 Stanmore Finchley Central Bounds Green 4 South Woodford Hainault Jubilee line Burnt Oak Canons Park Fairlop East Finchley Wood Green Colindale Northern line Snaresbrook Queensbury Barkingside Highgate Turnpike Lane Hendon Central Piccadilly line Tottenham Kingsbury Hale Newbury Park Archway Manor House Redbridge Victoria line Brent Cross 3 Walthamstow Wembley Park Central Seven Blackhorse Wanstead Gants Sisters Road Hill London Overground Neasden Golders Green Tufnell Park Arsenal Dollis Hill Hampstead Finsbury Park Leytonstone Willesden Green Belsize Park 3 Leyton Holloway Road Kilburn Kentish Town Highbury & Chalk Farm Islington West Hampstead Finchley Road Camden Town Caledonian Road Canonbury Stratford Swiss Cottage 2 2 Mornington St John’s Wood Crescent Dalston Junction Euston King’s Cross Haggerston St Pancras Baker Street Hoxton Warren Street Russell Square West Ham Liverpool Street Goodge Bethnal Mile End 1 Street Green Bond Shoreditch Oxford High Street Street Circus Bank Marble Arch Tottenham Holborn Chancery Lane Whitechapel West East Shepherd’s Notting Court Road Acton Acton Bush Hill Gate Ealing Covent Garden Broadway Lancaster Shadwell North White Holland Queensway Gate Green Park St Paul’s 1 2 2/3 3 4 Acton City Park Leicester Square
    [Show full text]
  • Culture for All Londoners Mayor of London’S Culture Strategy
    Culture for all Londoners Mayor of London’s Culture Strategy December 2018 Culture for all Londoners Mayor of London’s Culture Strategy December 2018 CULTURE FOR ALL LONDONERS Copyright Greater London Authority December 2018 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk More London London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk enquiries 020 7983 4100 minicom 020 7983 4458 See Photography Credits for copyright and caption information. All images are © Greater London Authority unless otherwise stated. Cover Image © GLA/Caroline Teo (Photographer) ‘Unveiling Mala Sen’ mural by Jasmin Kaur Sehra - LDNWMN Project 3 Contents Mayor’s Foreword 4 Executive Summary 10 Chapter 1: The Mayor’s Vision and Priorities for Culture 24 Chapter 2: Context and Scope of the Strategy 28 Chapter 3: Love London 46 Chapter 4: Culture and Good Growth 70 Chapter 5: Creative Londoners 104 Chapter 6: World City 126 Chapter 7: Achieving the Mayor’s Vision 148 Policy Actions 160 Glossary 170 Photography Credits 178 CULTURE FOR ALL LONDONERS 5 Mayor’s foreword Culture is our city’s DNA. It’s the thing Crucially, culture can also be used as that binds us all together - both in times a tool to steer young Londoners away of crisis and in times of celebration. from trouble and towards education and Culture is what makes the daytime thrive employment. It can open up new and and the night time come alive. positive paths forward for our young people, offering an alternative to getting London is one of the most culturally sucked into a life of crime, gangs and rich cities on the planet – with world- violence.
    [Show full text]
  • A Qualitative Evaluation of a Proposed Metro Map for Melbourne's
    A qualitative evaluation of a proposed metro map for Melbourne’s underground system. William Cartwright School of Mathematical and Geospatial Sciences at RMIT University, Australia Abstract When cities develop a rail network – above or under ground – this is usually accompanied by the publication of a metro map. The map is an essential adjunct, produced and provided to commuters to facilitate informed use of the system. It is generally agreed that the exemplar metro map is that of the London Underground, designed by Harry Beck, in 1931. Beck’s design principles have been copied, modified and adopted by numerous public transport bodies, when producing maps of their own system. His map is regarded as a design classic, and used as the lodestone when judging the effectiveness of other metromaps. Recently, Public Transport Victoria (PTV) developed a new design for a metromap for the rail system for Melbourne, Australia. This design is greatly based on Beck’s design ideas. As part of the press release, PTV sought passenger feedback on its proposed new design. It is refreshing to see that an organisation like Public Transport Victoria has taken the initiative to implement a new design, and to seek public feedback on this design. However, is this new design effective, or just ‘more of the same’? Is the map no different, and perhaps no better, than previous maps of the Melbourne metropolitan rail system, or a great improvement on what was previously published? Are we just going around in circles? This paper provides the results of an evaluation of this proposal for a new map for the Melbourne metropolitan rail system.
    [Show full text]