DOCSLIB.ORG

Cranial Morphology and Bite Force in Bats

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cranial Morphology and Bite Force in Bats CRANIOMANDIBULAR STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION IN MORMOOPID BATS A Thesis Presented to the faculty of the Department of Biological Sciences California State University, Sacramento Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Biological Sciences by Jeffrey B. Changaris FALL 2017 © 2017 Jeffrey B. Changaris ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii CRANIOMANDIBULAR STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION IN MORMOOPID BATS A Thesis by Jeffrey B. Changaris Approved by: ____________________________________, Committee Chair Dr. Ronald M. Coleman ____________________________________, Second Reader Dr. Winston C. Lancaster ____________________________________, Third Reader Dr. Joseph Bahlman ___________________________ Date iii Student: Jeffrey B. Changaris I certify that this student has met the requirements for format contained in the University format manual, and that this thesis is suitable for shelving in the Library and credit is to be awarded for the thesis. ____________________________, Graduate Coordinator _________________ Dr. James W. Baxter Date Department of Biological Sciences iv Abstract of CRANIOMANDIBULAR STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION IN MORMOOPID BATS by Jeffrey B. Changaris Neotropical Ghost-Faced bats of the genus Mormoops (Order Chiroptera, Family Mormoopidae) have a radically upturned rostrum, or snout, while the other mormoopid genus, Pteronotus, has only a slight upturning of the rostrum. This type of difference in morphology between closely related taxa is likely to be the result of some sort of specialization. Observation of Mormoops blainvillei, the Antillean Ghost-Faced bat, reveals that they can open their mouths very wide relative to the size of their heads. Mormoopid bats are insectivorous with Mormoops blainvillei having a prey preference of large moths, but related species, such as Pteronotus quadridens, the Sooty Mustached bat, have a more varied diet with a large component of smaller hard-bodied beetles. While there have been many studies on feeding ecology of phyllostomid bats, available research on mormoopids is limited and functional relationships between craniorostral shape and feeding mechanics have not been established. The objectives of this study were to quantify structural and functional differences in craniomandibular function between Mormoops blainvillei and Pteronotus quadridens by analyzing maximum gape, bite force, and masticatory muscle configuration and relate this to prey preference v previously described in the literature. Results showed that Mormoops blainvillei had a much wider maximum active gape and reduced normalized maximum bite force than Pteronotus quadridens which corresponded to the size and hardness of their respective diets. Mormoops blainvillei had a greater percentage of masticatory musculature allocated to wide gape than Pteronotus quadridens where the narrow gape chewing muscles were favored. Upturning of the rostrum reduces range of motion limitations at the craniomandibular joint which could have resulted in the ability to achieve wider gapes in Mormoops blainvillei. _______________________________, Committee Chair Dr. Ronald M. Coleman _______________________________ Date vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First, I would like to thank Dr. Winston C. Lancaster without whose guidance, assistance, companionship, camaraderie, perseverance, and patience this endeavor would have never reached this successful conclusion; I am forever in your debt. I would like to thank Dr. Ron Coleman for assuming the leadership role as committee chairman once Dr. Lancaster moved on in his worldly endeavors. I would also like to thank the rest of my committee, Dr. Rosalee Sprowls, Dr. Rodney Imamura, Dr. Joseph Bahlman, for their patience and valuable input, as well as the graduate committee, Dr. Jamie Kneitel, Dr. James Baxter, and Dr. Robert Crawford. Thanks go to Dr. Tom Schultze for his mathematical advice, Drs. Rafael Diaz and Jamie Kneitel for their statistical advice, Dr. Tim Davidson for his manuscript review and input, and Sulie Ober for her laboratory support. Special thanks go to Dr. Armando Rodríguez-Durán for providing access to Mata de Plátano Field Station and Culebrones Cave in Puerto Rico, and Dr. Betsy Dumont for her bite force assistance and loan of the bite force meter used during field work. Partial funding from California State University, Sacramento for travel to Puerto Rico and equipment came from a Research and Creative Activity (RCA) Award granted to Dr. Lancaster, Academically Related Activities (ARA), Student Academic Development (SAD) awards and Delisle funding granted to the author. I would also like to thank the following bat biologists for their support and assistance over the years and from whom I learned so much: Dr. Scott Pedersen, Dr. Gary vii Kweiznewski, Dr. Rick Adams, Dr. Allen Kurta, Ashley Rolfe, David Wyatt, and Linda Angerer. Major thanks go to Justin Moore for his motivational participation and manuscript review. I would like to thank my colleagues, Marcie Woolsey, Dean Won, Michael Sweet, Ken Kubo, Daniel Slutsky, Tom Peavy, Tom Landerholm, and D.J. Larkey for their support. Lastly, I thank my friends and family, Sherry Kimbrow, Danielle Delucchi, Stephanie Changaris, and Sherry Swim for their continued support. viii TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................... vii List of Tables .................................................................................................................... xi List of Figures .................................................................................................................. xii INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 Hypotheses and Objectives ..................................................................................... 6 METHODS ......................................................................................................................... 7 Field Data Collection .............................................................................................. 7 Gape Analysis ....................................................................................................... 13 Jaw Scaling ........................................................................................................... 18 Bite Force Analysis ............................................................................................... 22 Jaw Musculature ................................................................................................... 26 Statistical Analyses ............................................................................................... 30 RESULTS ......................................................................................................................... 33 Gape Analysis ....................................................................................................... 33 Bite Force Analysis ............................................................................................... 38 Jaw Musculature ................................................................................................... 38 DISCUSSION ................................................................................................................... 45 CONCLUSIONS............................................................................................................... 51 Appendix A ....................................................................................................................... 52 Appendix B ....................................................................................................................... 68 Appendix C ....................................................................................................................... 72 Appendix D ....................................................................................................................... 74 ix Appendix E ....................................................................................................................... 75 Literature Cited ................................................................................................................. 77 x LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Total Number of Mormoopid Bats Analyzed by Species ..................................... 34 2. Total Video Frames and Bite Force Measurements Analyzed for Two Species of Mormoopid Bats ............................................................................................... 35 3. Maximum Active Jaw Gapes for Two Species of Mormoopid Bats .................... 36 4. Maximum Bite Forces for Two Species of Mormoopid Bats ............................... 39 5. Craniomandibular Muscle Architecture Measurements of Mormoopid Bats by Sex and Species..................................................................................................... 41 6. Craniomandibular Muscle Organization for Two Species of Mormoopid Bats ............................................................................................................................... 42 xi LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Mormoopid Bats of Interest .................................................................................... 2 2. Rostral Orientations of Two Species of Mormoopid Bats ...................................... 4 3. Map of Puerto Rico showing the location of Culebrones Cave .............................. 8 4. Active Gape Video
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Acoustic Identification of Mormoopid Bats: a Survey During the Evening Exodus
    Journal of Mammalogy, 87(2):324–330, 2006 ACOUSTIC IDENTIFICATION OF MORMOOPID BATS: A SURVEY DURING THE EVENING EXODUS SILVIO MACI´AS,* EMANUEL C. MORA, AND ADIANEZ GARCI´A Department of Human and Animal Biology, Faculty of Biology, Havana University, CP 10 400, Ciudad de La Habana, Cuba (SM, ECM, AG) Department of Basic Formation, Faculty of Psychology, Havana University, Calle San Rafael No. 1168 entre Mazo´n y Basarrate, Centro Habana, Ciudad de La Habana, Cuba (SM) Echolocation calls emitted by the 4 species of Cuban mormoopid bats were compared to determine vocal signatures that enable identification of each species in the field during their evening exodus. Echolocation calls produced by Mormoops blainvilli are downward frequency-modulated (FM) signals in the range of 68.4– 52.5 kHz. Echolocation calls emitted by Pteronotus macleayii and P. quadridens have a similar design consisting of a short constant-frequency (CF) segment followed by a downward FM segment. The CF segment was at 70.0 kHz in calls from P. macleayii, and at 83.3 kHz in calls from P. quadridens. Echolocation calls from P. parnellii consist of a long CF segment, which is preceded by a short initial upward sweep and followed by a downward FM terminal sweep. The CF value of the 2nd harmonic was a good parameter for species identification. The features of the echolocation calls of each of the species were used to identify them during the evening exodus from 2 Cuban caves. Key words: echolocation, evening exodus, identification, mormoopid bats Effective monitoring of echolocation calls is vital in many families, such as Mormoopidae, should make it possible to use studies of the ecology and conservation of bats (Fenton 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • Noctilio Leporinus (Chiroptera, Noctilionidae) from South America
    AMERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES Number 3798, 31 pp. April 4, 2014 Quaternary Bats from the Impossível-Ioiô Cave System (Chapada Diamantina, Brazil): Humeral Remains and the First Fossil Record of Noctilio leporinus (Chiroptera, Noctilionidae) from South America LEANDRO O. SALLES,1, 2 JOAQUÍN ARROYO-CABRALES,3 ANNE CARULINY DO MONTE LIMA,1 WAGNER LANZELOTTI,1 FERNANDO A. PERINI,4 PAÚL M. VELAZCO,2 AND NANCY B. SIMMONS2 ABSTRACT The partially submerged Impossível-Ioiô cave system located in the karst region of Cha- pada Diamantina in Bahia (Brazil) has recently been the target of extensive paleontological studies. Here we provide the first report of fossil bats from this cave system, in which we rec- ognize six species based on humeral remains: Furipterus horrens, Chrotopterus auritus, Mor- moops cf. megalophylla, Pteronotus gymnonotus, Pteronotus parnellii, and Noctilio leporinus. Morphology of the humerus of these taxa is described in a comparative framework to docu- ment taxonomic assessments and provide a basis for future studies of fossil bat faunas. The relevance of the new records reported here is evaluated at a broader continental scale, as well as in contrast with the recent bat fauna of the region. The record of Noctilio leporinus stands as the first fossil occurrence of this species on the South American continent. 1 Mastozoologia, Departamento de Vertebrados, Museu Nacional/UFRJ, Quinta da Boa Vista, s/n, Rio de Janeiro 20940-040, Brazil. 2 Division of Vertebrate Zoology (Mammalogy), American Museum of Natural History. 3 Laboratorio de Arqueozoología, Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, Moneda # 16, Col. Centro México, D.F., México. 4 Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Avenida Antônio Carlos 6627, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Brazil.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Ecology of Cave Bats
    Chapter 15 Conservation Ecology of Cave Bats Neil M. Furey and Paul A. Racey Abstract Caves and other subterranean sites such as mines are critical to the sur- vival of hundreds of bat species worldwide, since they often provide shelter for most of a nation’s bat fauna. In the temperate zone, caves provide roosts for hiber- nation and for some species, breeding in summer, whereas in warmer regions, they support high species richness year round and enormous colonies that maintain substantial ecosystem services. Due to the solubility of the substrate, the highest densities of caves occur in karst landscapes. Given their importance for bats, rel- atively few studies have investigated factors involved in cave selection, although current evidence suggests that the density and size of caves are the best predictors of species diversity and population sizes. Thermal preferences have been estab- lished for some cave-dwelling species as well as their vulnerability to disturbance, particularly during hibernation and reproduction. Growth in limestone quarrying and cave tourism industries worldwide severely threatens cave-dwelling bats, in addition to loss of foraging habitat, hunting for bushmeat, incidental disturbance and disruptive guano harvesting. Apparent declines of cave bats in Europe and North America also pose serious concerns, as do global climate change predic- tions. The main conservation response to threats to cave bats in these continents N.M. Furey (*) Fauna & Flora International (Cambodia Programme), No. 19, Street 360, Boeng Keng Kang 1, PO Box 1380, Phnom Penh 12000, Cambodia e-mail: [email protected] P.A. Racey Centre for Ecology and Conservation, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Cornwall Campus, Treliever Road, Penryn TR10 9EZ, UK e-mail: [email protected] © The Author(s) 2016 463 C.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Quaternary Bat Diversity in the Dominican Republic
    AMERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES Number 3779, 20 pp. June 21, 2013 Quaternary Bat Diversity in the Dominican Republic PAÚL M. VELAZCO,1 HANNAH O’NEILL,2 GREGG F. GUNNELL,3 SIOBHÁN B. COOKE,4 RENATO RIMOLI,5 ALFRED L. ROSENBErgER,1, 6 AND NANCY B. SIMMONS1 ABSTRACT The fossil record of bats is extensive in the Caribbean, but few fossils have previously been reported from the Dominican Republic. In this paper, we describe new collections of fossil bats from two flooded caves in the Dominican Republic, and summarize previous finds from the Island of Hispaniola. The new collections were evaluated in the context of extant and fossil faunas of the Greater Antilles to provide information on the evolution of the bat community of Hispaniola. Eleven species were identified within the new collections, including five mormoopids (Mormoops blainvillei, †Mormoops magna, Pteronotus macleayii, P. parnellii, and P. quadridens), five phyllostomids (Brachy- phylla nana, Monophyllus redmani, Phyllonycteris poeyi, Erophylla bombifrons, and Phyllops falcatus), and one natalid (Chilonatalus micropus). All of these species today inhabitant Hispaniola with the exception of †Mormoops magna, an extinct species previously known only from the Quaternary of Cuba, and Pteronotus macleayii, which is currently known only from extant populations in Cuba and Jamaica, although Quaternary fossils have also been recovered in the Bahamas. Differences between the fossil faunas and those known from the island today suggest that dispersal and extirpa- tion events, perhaps linked to climate change or stochastic events such as hurricanes, may have played roles in structuring the modern fauna of Hispaniola. 1 Division of Vertebrate Zoology (Mammalogy), American Museum of Natural History.
    [Show full text]
  • Index of Handbook of the Mammals of the World. Vol. 9. Bats
    Index of Handbook of the Mammals of the World. Vol. 9. Bats A agnella, Kerivoula 901 Anchieta’s Bat 814 aquilus, Glischropus 763 Aba Leaf-nosed Bat 247 aladdin, Pipistrellus pipistrellus 771 Anchieta’s Broad-faced Fruit Bat 94 aquilus, Platyrrhinus 567 Aba Roundleaf Bat 247 alascensis, Myotis lucifugus 927 Anchieta’s Pipistrelle 814 Arabian Barbastelle 861 abae, Hipposideros 247 alaschanicus, Hypsugo 810 anchietae, Plerotes 94 Arabian Horseshoe Bat 296 abae, Rhinolophus fumigatus 290 Alashanian Pipistrelle 810 ancricola, Myotis 957 Arabian Mouse-tailed Bat 164, 170, 176 abbotti, Myotis hasseltii 970 alba, Ectophylla 466, 480, 569 Andaman Horseshoe Bat 314 Arabian Pipistrelle 810 abditum, Megaderma spasma 191 albatus, Myopterus daubentonii 663 Andaman Intermediate Horseshoe Arabian Trident Bat 229 Abo Bat 725, 832 Alberico’s Broad-nosed Bat 565 Bat 321 Arabian Trident Leaf-nosed Bat 229 Abo Butterfly Bat 725, 832 albericoi, Platyrrhinus 565 andamanensis, Rhinolophus 321 arabica, Asellia 229 abramus, Pipistrellus 777 albescens, Myotis 940 Andean Fruit Bat 547 arabicus, Hypsugo 810 abrasus, Cynomops 604, 640 albicollis, Megaerops 64 Andersen’s Bare-backed Fruit Bat 109 arabicus, Rousettus aegyptiacus 87 Abruzzi’s Wrinkle-lipped Bat 645 albipinnis, Taphozous longimanus 353 Andersen’s Flying Fox 158 arabium, Rhinopoma cystops 176 Abyssinian Horseshoe Bat 290 albiventer, Nyctimene 36, 118 Andersen’s Fruit-eating Bat 578 Arafura Large-footed Bat 969 Acerodon albiventris, Noctilio 405, 411 Andersen’s Leaf-nosed Bat 254 Arata Yellow-shouldered Bat 543 Sulawesi 134 albofuscus, Scotoecus 762 Andersen’s Little Fruit-eating Bat 578 Arata-Thomas Yellow-shouldered Talaud 134 alboguttata, Glauconycteris 833 Andersen’s Naked-backed Fruit Bat 109 Bat 543 Acerodon 134 albus, Diclidurus 339, 367 Andersen’s Roundleaf Bat 254 aratathomasi, Sturnira 543 Acerodon mackloti (see A.
    [Show full text]
  • Puerto Rico Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy 2005
    Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy Puerto Rico PUERTO RICO COMPREHENSIVE WILDLIFE CONSERVATION STRATEGY 2005 Miguel A. García José A. Cruz-Burgos Eduardo Ventosa-Febles Ricardo López-Ortiz ii Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy Puerto Rico ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Financial support for the completion of this initiative was provided to the Puerto Rico Department of Natural and Environmental Resources (DNER) by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Federal Assistance Office. Special thanks to Mr. Michael L. Piccirilli, Ms. Nicole Jiménez-Cooper, Ms. Emily Jo Williams, and Ms. Christine Willis from the USFWS, Region 4, for their support through the preparation of this document. Thanks to the colleagues that participated in the Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy (CWCS) Steering Committee: Mr. Ramón F. Martínez, Mr. José Berríos, Mrs. Aida Rosario, Mr. José Chabert, and Dr. Craig Lilyestrom for their collaboration in different aspects of this strategy. Other colleagues from DNER also contributed significantly to complete this document within the limited time schedule: Ms. María Camacho, Mr. Ramón L. Rivera, Ms. Griselle Rodríguez Ferrer, Mr. Alberto Puente, Mr. José Sustache, Ms. María M. Santiago, Mrs. María de Lourdes Olmeda, Mr. Gustavo Olivieri, Mrs. Vanessa Gautier, Ms. Hana Y. López-Torres, Mrs. Carmen Cardona, and Mr. Iván Llerandi-Román. Also, special thanks to Mr. Juan Luis Martínez from the University of Puerto Rico, for designing the cover of this document. A number of collaborators participated in earlier revisions of this CWCS: Mr. Fernando Nuñez-García, Mr. José Berríos, Dr. Craig Lilyestrom, Mr. Miguel Figuerola and Mr. Leopoldo Miranda. A special recognition goes to the authors and collaborators of the supporting documents, particularly, Regulation No.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Impact Assessment
    Environmental Impact Assessment CAEL Wind Farm, Great Valley Manchester September 2012 EIA for a Wind Farm at Great Valley Manchester by CAEL September 2012 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 Background and Project Rationale ................................................................................................. 6 2.0 Project Description ............................................................................................................................. 11 2.1 Project Location .............................................................................................................................. 11 2.2 Project Design ................................................................................................................................. 14 2.3 Transportation and Road Widening ............................................................................................. 25 2.4 Access Road Design ....................................................................................................................... 29 Figure 12: Layout of Access Routes to Turbines ................................................................................... 30 2.5 Project Schedule and Project Management Team ...................................................................... 31 2.6 Decommissioning...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • WOOLLY FALSE VAMPIRE Chrotopterus Auritus (W.Peters, 1856)
    Smith P - Chrotopterus auritus - FAUNA Paraguay Handbook of the Mammals of Paraguay Number 24 2008 WOOLLY FALSE VAMPIRE Chrotopterus auritus (W.Peters, 1856) FIGURE 1 - Head detail (© Merlin D. Tuttle, Bat Conservation International, www.batcon.org). TAXONOMY: Class Mammalia; Subclass Theria; Infraclass Metatheria; Order Chiroptera; Suborder Microchiroptera; Superfamily Noctilionoidea; Family Phyllostomidae; Subfamily Phyllostominae, Tribe Vampyrini (López-Gonzalez 2005, Myers et al 2006, Hoofer et al 2008). This species is the sole representative of the genus Chrotopterus, Peters 1865. The origin of the name Chrotopterus is Greek meaning "skin colour wing" presumably in reference to the wing membranes (Palmer 1904). The species name auritus is Latin meaning "long-eared". (Braun & Mares 1995). Czaplewski & Cartelle (1998) describe Quaternary fossils of this species from Minas Gerais, São Paulo and Bahía, Brazil. Carter & Dolan (1978) disputed the designation of Mexico as the type locality and claimed that the type specimen actually came from Santa Catarina, Brazil. However Peters (1856) clearly states that the specimen is from Mexico and Medellín (1989) claims that the type specimen is ZMB 10058 in the Zoologisches Museum der Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, which consists of a clean skull and skeleton with body parts in alcohol (Gardner 2007). Traditionally three subspecies have been recognised, that present in Paraguay is C.a.australis Thomas 1905 (Type Locality Concepción, Paraguay). Supposedly this subspecies is distinguished by its extensive woolly grey pelage which covers the wing and tail membranes reaching the elbows and knees, a Smith P 2008 - WOOLLY FALSE VAMPIRE Chrotopterus auritus - Mammals of Paraguay Nº 24 Page 1 Smith P - Chrotopterus auritus - FAUNA Paraguay Handbook of the Mammals of Paraguay Number 24 2008 small white spot on the wing tips and a woolly patch on the metacarpal of the thumb.
    [Show full text]
  • Echolocation Calls and Wing Morphology of Bats from the West Indies
    Acta Chiropterologica, 6(1): 75–90, 2004 PL ISSN 1508–1109 © Museum and Institute of Zoology PAS Echolocation calls and wing morphology of bats from the West Indies NANCY VAUGHAN JENNINGS1, STUART PARSONS2, KATE E. BARLOW3, and MICHAEL R. GANNON4 1School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1UG, United Kingdom E-mail: [email protected] 2School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand 32 The Paddock, Seton Mains, Longniddry, East Lothian, EH32 0PG, United Kingdom Previous address: School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1UG, United Kingdom 4Department of Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, Altoona College, 3000 Ivyside Park Altoona, PA 16601-3760, USA Echolocation calls of 119 bats belonging to 12 species in three families from Antillean islands of Puerto Rico, Dominica, and St. Vincent were recorded by using time-expansion methods. Spectrograms of calls and descriptive statistics of five temporal and frequency variables measured from calls are presented. The echolocation calls of many of these species, particularly those in the family Phyllostomidae, have not been described previously. The wing morphology of each taxon is described and related to the structure of its echolocation calls and its foraging ecology. Of slow aerial-hawking insectivores, the Mormoopidae and Natalidae Mormoops blainvillii, Pteronotus davyi davyi, P. quadridens fuliginosus, and Natalus stramineus stramineus can forage with great manoeuvrability in background-cluttered space (close to vegetation), and are able to hover. Pteronotus parnellii portoricensis is able to fly and echolocate in highly-cluttered space (dense vegetation). Among frugivores, nectarivores and omnivores in the family Phyllostomidae, Brachyphylla cavernarum intermedia is adapted to foraging in the edges of vegetation in background-cluttered space, while Erophylla bombifrons bombifrons, Glossophaga longirostris rostrata, Artibeus jamaicensis jamaicensis, A.
    [Show full text]
  • Broad Host Range of SARS-Cov-2 Predicted by Comparative and Structural Analysis of ACE2 in Vertebrates
    Broad host range of SARS-CoV-2 predicted by comparative and structural analysis of ACE2 in vertebrates Joana Damasa,1, Graham M. Hughesb,1, Kathleen C. Keoughc,d,1, Corrie A. Paintere,1, Nicole S. Perskyf,1, Marco Corboa, Michael Hillerg,h,i, Klaus-Peter Koepflij, Andreas R. Pfenningk, Huabin Zhaol,m, Diane P. Genereuxn, Ross Swoffordn, Katherine S. Pollardd,o,p, Oliver A. Ryderq,r, Martin T. Nweeias,t,u, Kerstin Lindblad-Tohn,v, Emma C. Teelingb, Elinor K. Karlssonn,w,x, and Harris A. Lewina,y,z,2 aThe Genome Center, University of California, Davis, CA 95616; bSchool of Biology and Environmental Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland; cGraduate Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences and Pharmacogenomics, Quantitative Biosciences Consortium, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94117; dGladstone Institute of Data Science and Biotechnology, San Francisco, CA 94158; eCancer Program, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142; fGenetic Perturbation Platform, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142; gMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, 01307 Dresden, Germany; hMax Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems, 01187 Dresden, Germany; iCenter for Systems Biology Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany; jCenter for Species Survival, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, Front Royal, VA 22630; kDepartment of Computational Biology, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213; lDepartment of Ecology,
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 52, 2011
    BAT RESEARCH NEWS VOLUME 52: NO. 1 SPRING 2011 BAT RESEARCH NEWS VOLUME 52: NUMBER 1 SPRING 2011 Table of Contents Book Review Bats of Ohio by Virgil Brack, Jr., Dale W. Sparks, John O. Whitaker, Jr., Brianne L. Walters, and Angela Boyer Michael Lacki . 1 Letter from the Editor Margaret Griffiths . 3 Recent Literature Jacques Veilleux . 4 Announcements and Future Meetings . 11 VOLUME 52: NUMBER 2 SUMMER 2011 Table of Contents A Five-year Assessment of Mortality and Geographic Spread of White-nose Syndrome in North American Bats and a Look to the Future Gregory G. Turner, DeeAnn M. Reeder, and Jeremy T. H. Coleman . 13 Observations of Eastern Red Bats (Lasiurus borealis) 160 Kilometers from the Coast of Nova Scotia Zenon Czenze, Sarah N. P. Wong, and Craig K. R. Willis . 28 Recent Literature . 31 Announcements and Future Meetings . 36 Advertisement . 38 i BAT RESEARCH NEWS VOLUME 52: NUMBER 3 FALL 2011 Table of Contents Letter from the Editor Margaret Griffiths . vi Opportunistic Consumption of Blood from Pallas’s Long-tongued Bat, Glossophaga soricina, by the Common Vampire, Desmodus rotundus, in Brazil Renan de França Souza, Camila Sant’Anna, Mariana V.P. Aguiar, André C. Siqueira, Davi C. Tavares, Rafael S. Laurindo, and Roberto Leonan M. Novaes . 39 Letter to the Editor Substitutability of Bats in Agricultural Systems: Why Ecosystem Valuation Is Not Likely to Sway Agricultural Interests Wayne E. Thogmartin . 41 Recent Literature Jacques Veilleux . 45 Announcements and Future Meetings . 51 VOLUME 52: NUMBER 4 WINTER 2011 Table of Contents Letter to the Editor Retention of the Common Name Eastern Pipistrelle for Perimyotis subflavus John O.
    [Show full text]
  • Caribbean Naturalist No
    Caribbean Naturalist No. 35 2016 Conservation Value of Remnant Habitat for Neotropical Bats on Islands Armando Rodríguez-Durán and Waldemar Feliciano-Robles The Caribbean Naturalist . ♦ A peer-reviewed and edited interdisciplinary natural history science journal with a re- gional focus on the Caribbean ( ISSN 2326-7119 [online]). ♦ Featuring research articles, notes, and research summaries on terrestrial, fresh-water, and marine organisms, and their habitats. The journal's versatility also extends to pub- lishing symposium proceedings or other collections of related papers as special issues. ♦ Focusing on field ecology, biology, behavior, biogeography, taxonomy, evolution, anatomy, physiology, geology, and related fields. Manuscripts on genetics, molecular biology, anthropology, etc., are welcome, especially if they provide natural history in- sights that are of interest to field scientists. ♦ Offers authors the option of publishing large maps, data tables, audio and video clips, and even powerpoint presentations as online supplemental files. ♦ Proposals for Special Issues are welcome. ♦ Arrangements for indexing through a wide range of services, including Web of Knowledge (includes Web of Science, Current Contents Connect, Biological Ab- stracts, BIOSIS Citation Index, BIOSIS Previews, CAB Abstracts), PROQUEST, SCOPUS, BIOBASE, EMBiology, Current Awareness in Biological Sciences (CABS), EBSCOHost, VINITI (All-Russian Institute of Scientific and Technical Information), FFAB (Fish, Fisheries, and Aquatic Biodiversity Worldwide), WOW (Waters and Oceans Worldwide), and Zoological Record, are being pursued. ♦ The journal staff is pleased to discuss ideas for manuscripts and to assist during all stages of manuscript preparation. The journal has a mandatory page charge to help defray a portion of the costs of publishing the manuscript. Instructions for Authors are available online on the journal’s website (www.eaglehill.us/cana).
    [Show full text]