DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Impact Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Impact Assessment Environmental Impact Assessment CAEL Wind Farm, Great Valley Manchester September 2012 EIA for a Wind Farm at Great Valley Manchester by CAEL September 2012 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 Background and Project Rationale ................................................................................................. 6 2.0 Project Description ............................................................................................................................. 11 2.1 Project Location .............................................................................................................................. 11 2.2 Project Design ................................................................................................................................. 14 2.3 Transportation and Road Widening ............................................................................................. 25 2.4 Access Road Design ....................................................................................................................... 29 Figure 12: Layout of Access Routes to Turbines ................................................................................... 30 2.5 Project Schedule and Project Management Team ...................................................................... 31 2.6 Decommissioning............................................................................................................................ 31 3.0 Regulatory Framework ....................................................................................................................... 32 3.1 Applicable Policies .......................................................................................................................... 32 3.2 Applicable Legislation..................................................................................................................... 34 3.3 Recommended Standards ............................................................................................................... 38 3.4 The Application Process ................................................................................................................ 38 4.0 Description of the Environment....................................................................................................... 40 4.1 Physical Baseline .............................................................................................................................. 40 4.1.1 General Climate ....................................................................................................................... 40 4.1.2 Ambient Air Quality ............................................................................................................... 42 4.1.3 Ambient Noise Levels ............................................................................................................ 42 4.1.4 Topography .............................................................................................................................. 43 4.1.5 Geomorphology ...................................................................................................................... 43 4.1.6 Soil ............................................................................................................................................. 43 4.1.7 Geology .................................................................................................................................... 45 4.1.8 Hydrology................................................................................................................................. 47 4.2 Biological Baseline ........................................................................................................................... 49 4.2.1 Vegetation ................................................................................................................................ 49 4.2.2 Avifauna ................................................................................................................................... 52 4.2.3 Other Animals ......................................................................................................................... 56 4.3 Socio-Economic Baseline .............................................................................................................. 57 4.3.1 Demography ............................................................................................................................ 57 4.3.2 Housing .................................................................................................................................... 58 4.3.3 Utilities ...................................................................................................................................... 58 4.3.4 Municipal Services .................................................................................................................. 59 1 | P a g e Environmental & Engineering Managers Ltd. EIA for a Wind Farm at Great Valley Manchester by CAEL September 2012 4.4 Economy .......................................................................................................................................... 60 4.5 Land Use ........................................................................................................................................... 64 4.5.1 Historical Land Use ................................................................................................................ 64 4.5.2 Current Land Use ................................................................................................................... 64 4.5.3 Heritage Sites ........................................................................................................................... 65 5.0 Community Development: Perspective of Residents on Proposed Development ................... 66 5.1 Methodology .................................................................................................................................... 66 5.2 General Profile of Respondents .................................................................................................... 66 5.2.1 Community Participation ....................................................................................................... 66 5.2.2 Gender and Age Distributions .............................................................................................. 67 5.2.3 Educational Profile ................................................................................................................. 67 5.2.4 Employment and Income ...................................................................................................... 68 5.2.5 Land Tenure ............................................................................................................................ 69 5.2.6 Community Utilities and Infrastructure .............................................................................. 69 5.2.7 Resource Usage and Management ........................................................................................ 73 5.2.8 Natural Disasters ..................................................................................................................... 76 5.3 Community Organisation ............................................................................................................... 76 5.4 Social Assessment of Impacts ....................................................................................................... 78 5.4.1 Positive Impacts ...................................................................................................................... 79 5.4.2 Potential Negative Impacts.................................................................................................... 79 6.0 Identification of Environmental Impacts ........................................................................................ 80 6.1 Potential Negative Impacts ............................................................................................................ 82 6.1.1 Construction Phase ................................................................................................................. 82 6.1.2 Operational Phase ................................................................................................................... 86 6.2 Significant Environmental and Social Impacts ........................................................................ 105 6.3 Cumulative Impacts – Operational Phase ................................................................................ 131 6.4 Potential Positive Impacts........................................................................................................... 131 6.4.1 Construction Phase .............................................................................................................. 131 6.4.2 Operational Phase ................................................................................................................ 132 6.5 Summary of Significant Impacts ................................................................................................ 137 7.0 Mitigation Measures ......................................................................................................................... 140 8.0 Emergency Preparedness and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cranial Morphology and Bite Force in Bats
    CRANIOMANDIBULAR STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION IN MORMOOPID BATS A Thesis Presented to the faculty of the Department of Biological Sciences California State University, Sacramento Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Biological Sciences by Jeffrey B. Changaris FALL 2017 © 2017 Jeffrey B. Changaris ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii CRANIOMANDIBULAR STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION IN MORMOOPID BATS A Thesis by Jeffrey B. Changaris Approved by: ____________________________________, Committee Chair Dr. Ronald M. Coleman ____________________________________, Second Reader Dr. Winston C. Lancaster ____________________________________, Third Reader Dr. Joseph Bahlman ___________________________ Date iii Student: Jeffrey B. Changaris I certify that this student has met the requirements for format contained in the University format manual, and that this thesis is suitable for shelving in the Library and credit is to be awarded for the thesis. ____________________________, Graduate Coordinator _________________ Dr. James W. Baxter Date Department of Biological Sciences iv Abstract of CRANIOMANDIBULAR STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION IN MORMOOPID BATS by Jeffrey B. Changaris Neotropical Ghost-Faced bats of the genus Mormoops (Order Chiroptera, Family Mormoopidae) have a radically upturned rostrum, or snout, while the other mormoopid genus, Pteronotus, has only a slight upturning of the rostrum. This type of difference in morphology between closely related taxa is likely to be the result of some sort of specialization. Observation of Mormoops blainvillei, the Antillean Ghost-Faced bat, reveals that they can open their mouths very wide relative to the size of their heads. Mormoopid bats are insectivorous with Mormoops blainvillei having a prey preference of large moths, but related species, such as Pteronotus quadridens, the Sooty Mustached bat, have a more varied diet with a large component of smaller hard-bodied beetles.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Ecology of Cave Bats
    Chapter 15 Conservation Ecology of Cave Bats Neil M. Furey and Paul A. Racey Abstract Caves and other subterranean sites such as mines are critical to the sur- vival of hundreds of bat species worldwide, since they often provide shelter for most of a nation’s bat fauna. In the temperate zone, caves provide roosts for hiber- nation and for some species, breeding in summer, whereas in warmer regions, they support high species richness year round and enormous colonies that maintain substantial ecosystem services. Due to the solubility of the substrate, the highest densities of caves occur in karst landscapes. Given their importance for bats, rel- atively few studies have investigated factors involved in cave selection, although current evidence suggests that the density and size of caves are the best predictors of species diversity and population sizes. Thermal preferences have been estab- lished for some cave-dwelling species as well as their vulnerability to disturbance, particularly during hibernation and reproduction. Growth in limestone quarrying and cave tourism industries worldwide severely threatens cave-dwelling bats, in addition to loss of foraging habitat, hunting for bushmeat, incidental disturbance and disruptive guano harvesting. Apparent declines of cave bats in Europe and North America also pose serious concerns, as do global climate change predic- tions. The main conservation response to threats to cave bats in these continents N.M. Furey (*) Fauna & Flora International (Cambodia Programme), No. 19, Street 360, Boeng Keng Kang 1, PO Box 1380, Phnom Penh 12000, Cambodia e-mail: [email protected] P.A. Racey Centre for Ecology and Conservation, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Cornwall Campus, Treliever Road, Penryn TR10 9EZ, UK e-mail: [email protected] © The Author(s) 2016 463 C.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Index of Handbook of the Mammals of the World. Vol. 9. Bats
    Index of Handbook of the Mammals of the World. Vol. 9. Bats A agnella, Kerivoula 901 Anchieta’s Bat 814 aquilus, Glischropus 763 Aba Leaf-nosed Bat 247 aladdin, Pipistrellus pipistrellus 771 Anchieta’s Broad-faced Fruit Bat 94 aquilus, Platyrrhinus 567 Aba Roundleaf Bat 247 alascensis, Myotis lucifugus 927 Anchieta’s Pipistrelle 814 Arabian Barbastelle 861 abae, Hipposideros 247 alaschanicus, Hypsugo 810 anchietae, Plerotes 94 Arabian Horseshoe Bat 296 abae, Rhinolophus fumigatus 290 Alashanian Pipistrelle 810 ancricola, Myotis 957 Arabian Mouse-tailed Bat 164, 170, 176 abbotti, Myotis hasseltii 970 alba, Ectophylla 466, 480, 569 Andaman Horseshoe Bat 314 Arabian Pipistrelle 810 abditum, Megaderma spasma 191 albatus, Myopterus daubentonii 663 Andaman Intermediate Horseshoe Arabian Trident Bat 229 Abo Bat 725, 832 Alberico’s Broad-nosed Bat 565 Bat 321 Arabian Trident Leaf-nosed Bat 229 Abo Butterfly Bat 725, 832 albericoi, Platyrrhinus 565 andamanensis, Rhinolophus 321 arabica, Asellia 229 abramus, Pipistrellus 777 albescens, Myotis 940 Andean Fruit Bat 547 arabicus, Hypsugo 810 abrasus, Cynomops 604, 640 albicollis, Megaerops 64 Andersen’s Bare-backed Fruit Bat 109 arabicus, Rousettus aegyptiacus 87 Abruzzi’s Wrinkle-lipped Bat 645 albipinnis, Taphozous longimanus 353 Andersen’s Flying Fox 158 arabium, Rhinopoma cystops 176 Abyssinian Horseshoe Bat 290 albiventer, Nyctimene 36, 118 Andersen’s Fruit-eating Bat 578 Arafura Large-footed Bat 969 Acerodon albiventris, Noctilio 405, 411 Andersen’s Leaf-nosed Bat 254 Arata Yellow-shouldered Bat 543 Sulawesi 134 albofuscus, Scotoecus 762 Andersen’s Little Fruit-eating Bat 578 Arata-Thomas Yellow-shouldered Talaud 134 alboguttata, Glauconycteris 833 Andersen’s Naked-backed Fruit Bat 109 Bat 543 Acerodon 134 albus, Diclidurus 339, 367 Andersen’s Roundleaf Bat 254 aratathomasi, Sturnira 543 Acerodon mackloti (see A.
    [Show full text]
  • Puerto Rico Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy 2005
    Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy Puerto Rico PUERTO RICO COMPREHENSIVE WILDLIFE CONSERVATION STRATEGY 2005 Miguel A. García José A. Cruz-Burgos Eduardo Ventosa-Febles Ricardo López-Ortiz ii Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy Puerto Rico ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Financial support for the completion of this initiative was provided to the Puerto Rico Department of Natural and Environmental Resources (DNER) by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Federal Assistance Office. Special thanks to Mr. Michael L. Piccirilli, Ms. Nicole Jiménez-Cooper, Ms. Emily Jo Williams, and Ms. Christine Willis from the USFWS, Region 4, for their support through the preparation of this document. Thanks to the colleagues that participated in the Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy (CWCS) Steering Committee: Mr. Ramón F. Martínez, Mr. José Berríos, Mrs. Aida Rosario, Mr. José Chabert, and Dr. Craig Lilyestrom for their collaboration in different aspects of this strategy. Other colleagues from DNER also contributed significantly to complete this document within the limited time schedule: Ms. María Camacho, Mr. Ramón L. Rivera, Ms. Griselle Rodríguez Ferrer, Mr. Alberto Puente, Mr. José Sustache, Ms. María M. Santiago, Mrs. María de Lourdes Olmeda, Mr. Gustavo Olivieri, Mrs. Vanessa Gautier, Ms. Hana Y. López-Torres, Mrs. Carmen Cardona, and Mr. Iván Llerandi-Román. Also, special thanks to Mr. Juan Luis Martínez from the University of Puerto Rico, for designing the cover of this document. A number of collaborators participated in earlier revisions of this CWCS: Mr. Fernando Nuñez-García, Mr. José Berríos, Dr. Craig Lilyestrom, Mr. Miguel Figuerola and Mr. Leopoldo Miranda. A special recognition goes to the authors and collaborators of the supporting documents, particularly, Regulation No.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 52, 2011
    BAT RESEARCH NEWS VOLUME 52: NO. 1 SPRING 2011 BAT RESEARCH NEWS VOLUME 52: NUMBER 1 SPRING 2011 Table of Contents Book Review Bats of Ohio by Virgil Brack, Jr., Dale W. Sparks, John O. Whitaker, Jr., Brianne L. Walters, and Angela Boyer Michael Lacki . 1 Letter from the Editor Margaret Griffiths . 3 Recent Literature Jacques Veilleux . 4 Announcements and Future Meetings . 11 VOLUME 52: NUMBER 2 SUMMER 2011 Table of Contents A Five-year Assessment of Mortality and Geographic Spread of White-nose Syndrome in North American Bats and a Look to the Future Gregory G. Turner, DeeAnn M. Reeder, and Jeremy T. H. Coleman . 13 Observations of Eastern Red Bats (Lasiurus borealis) 160 Kilometers from the Coast of Nova Scotia Zenon Czenze, Sarah N. P. Wong, and Craig K. R. Willis . 28 Recent Literature . 31 Announcements and Future Meetings . 36 Advertisement . 38 i BAT RESEARCH NEWS VOLUME 52: NUMBER 3 FALL 2011 Table of Contents Letter from the Editor Margaret Griffiths . vi Opportunistic Consumption of Blood from Pallas’s Long-tongued Bat, Glossophaga soricina, by the Common Vampire, Desmodus rotundus, in Brazil Renan de França Souza, Camila Sant’Anna, Mariana V.P. Aguiar, André C. Siqueira, Davi C. Tavares, Rafael S. Laurindo, and Roberto Leonan M. Novaes . 39 Letter to the Editor Substitutability of Bats in Agricultural Systems: Why Ecosystem Valuation Is Not Likely to Sway Agricultural Interests Wayne E. Thogmartin . 41 Recent Literature Jacques Veilleux . 45 Announcements and Future Meetings . 51 VOLUME 52: NUMBER 4 WINTER 2011 Table of Contents Letter to the Editor Retention of the Common Name Eastern Pipistrelle for Perimyotis subflavus John O.
    [Show full text]
  • Caribbean Naturalist No
    Caribbean Naturalist No. 35 2016 Conservation Value of Remnant Habitat for Neotropical Bats on Islands Armando Rodríguez-Durán and Waldemar Feliciano-Robles The Caribbean Naturalist . ♦ A peer-reviewed and edited interdisciplinary natural history science journal with a re- gional focus on the Caribbean ( ISSN 2326-7119 [online]). ♦ Featuring research articles, notes, and research summaries on terrestrial, fresh-water, and marine organisms, and their habitats. The journal's versatility also extends to pub- lishing symposium proceedings or other collections of related papers as special issues. ♦ Focusing on field ecology, biology, behavior, biogeography, taxonomy, evolution, anatomy, physiology, geology, and related fields. Manuscripts on genetics, molecular biology, anthropology, etc., are welcome, especially if they provide natural history in- sights that are of interest to field scientists. ♦ Offers authors the option of publishing large maps, data tables, audio and video clips, and even powerpoint presentations as online supplemental files. ♦ Proposals for Special Issues are welcome. ♦ Arrangements for indexing through a wide range of services, including Web of Knowledge (includes Web of Science, Current Contents Connect, Biological Ab- stracts, BIOSIS Citation Index, BIOSIS Previews, CAB Abstracts), PROQUEST, SCOPUS, BIOBASE, EMBiology, Current Awareness in Biological Sciences (CABS), EBSCOHost, VINITI (All-Russian Institute of Scientific and Technical Information), FFAB (Fish, Fisheries, and Aquatic Biodiversity Worldwide), WOW (Waters and Oceans Worldwide), and Zoological Record, are being pursued. ♦ The journal staff is pleased to discuss ideas for manuscripts and to assist during all stages of manuscript preparation. The journal has a mandatory page charge to help defray a portion of the costs of publishing the manuscript. Instructions for Authors are available online on the journal’s website (www.eaglehill.us/cana).
    [Show full text]
  • Unexplored Diversity and Conservation Potential of Neotropical Hot Caves
    Essay Unexplored Diversity and Conservation Potential of Neotropical Hot Caves RICHARD J. LADLE,∗†JOAO˜ V. L. FIRMINO,∗ ANA C. M. MALHADO,∗§ AND ARMANDO RODR´IGUEZ-DURAN‡´ ∗Institute of Biological and Health Sciences, Federal University of Alagoas, Av. Lourival Melo Mota, s/n, Tabuleiro do Martins, Maceio,´ AL 57072-900, Brazil †School of Geography and the Environment, Oxford University, Dyson Perrins Building, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QY, United Kingdom ‡Universidad Interamericana de Puerto Rico, 500 John W. Harris, Bayamon´ 00957, Puerto Rico Abstract: The term hot cave is used to describe some subterranean chambers in the Neotropics that are characterized by constantly high ambient temperatures generated by the body heat of high densities of certain bat species. Many of these species have limited geographic ranges, and some occur only in the hot-cave environment. In addition to the bats, the stable microclimate and abundant bat guano provides refuge and food for a high diversity of invertebrates. Hot caves have so far been described in the Caribbean and in a few isolated locations from Mexico to Brazil, although there is some evidence that similar caves may be present throughout the tropics. The existing literature suggests these poorly known ecosystems, with their unique combination of geomorphology and bat-generated microclimate, are particularly sensitive to disturbance and face multiple threats from urbanization, agricultural development, mining, and tourism. Keywords: arthropods, bats, Brazil, species discovery Diversidad No Explorada y Potencial de Conservacion´ de Cuevas Neotropicales Calientes Resumen: El t´ermino cueva caliente es utilizado para describir algunas camaras´ subterraneas´ en el Neotropico´ que se caracterizan por temperaturas ambientales elevadas generadas por el calor corporal de densidades altas de ciertas especies de murci´elagos.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Damage Caused by Mammal and Reptile Species in Puerto Rico
    ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (FINAL) MANAGING DAMAGE CAUSED BY MAMMAL AND REPTILE SPECIES IN PUERTO RICO PREPARED BY: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ANIMAL AND PLANT HEALTH INSPECTION SERVICE WILDLIFE SERVICES In consultation with: Puerto Rico Department of Natural and Environmental Resources APRIL 2021 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Wildlife are an important public resource that can provide economic, recreational, emotional, and esthetic benefits to many people. However, wildlife can cause damage to agricultural resources, natural resources, property, and threaten human safety. When people experience damage caused by wildlife or when wildlife threatens to cause damage, people may seek assistance from other entities. The United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services (WS) program is the lead federal agency responsible for managing conflicts between people and wildlife. Therefore, people experiencing damage or threats of damage associated with wildlife could seek assistance from WS. In Puerto Rico, WS has and continues to receive requests for assistance to reduce and prevent damage associated with several mammal and reptile species that are not native to the Commonwealth. In addition, WS could receive requests for assistance associated with several native bat species. The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires federal agencies to incorporate environmental planning into federal agency actions and decision-making processes. Therefore, if WS provided assistance by conducting activities to manage damage caused by mammal and reptile species, those activities would be a federal action requiring compliance with the NEPA. The NEPA requires federal agencies to have available and fully consider detailed information regarding environmental effects of federal actions and to make information regarding environmental effects available to interested persons and agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Armando Rodríguez Durán, Local Host Frank Bonaccorso, Gary
    Armando Rodríguez Durán, Local Host Frank Bonaccorso, Gary Kwiecinski & Shahroukh Mistry, Program Directors Abstracts 42nd Annual Symposium of the North American Society for Bat Research San Juan, Puerto Rico 25-27 October 2011 Local Host is Armando Rodríguez-Durán and Universidad Interamericana de Puerto Rico. Abstracts were compiled by Frank Bonaccorso, Gary Kwiecinski, and Shahroukh Mistry, Program Directors for NASBR. Abstracts below for both platform and poster presentations are listed alphabetically by first author’s last name. Contact information for authors attending the 42nd Annual NASBR is listed in the Program. Lost in the Dark: Spatio-temporal Variation in Bat Activity Amanda Adams Western University, London, ON Effective management and conservation strategies for biological communities require a thorough understanding of structure and function. The structure of a community, the number of species, and the distribution of those individuals can vary dramatically both temporally and spatially. When attempting to characterize the structure of a community it is important to consider the advantages and limitations of various sampling techniques. When and how to sample is a question that is typically decided by time availability, manpower, and equipment limitations. I hypothesized that not only the sampling methods and effort will have an effect on the depiction of a community, but also the statistical methods used to analyze that data. I deployed stationary acoustic transects with six microphones at two heights in order to see how multiple microphones give different depictions of the temporal and spatial variation of bat activity within a site. I found that detector height and number of microphones used within a site effect the ability to detect variability in activity patterns and species’ differential use of space and time.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 51: No. 1 Spring 2010 Bat Research News
    BAT RESEARCH NEWS VOLUME 51: NO. 1 SPRING 2010 BAT RESEARCH NEWS VOLUME 51: NUMBER 1 SPRING 2010 Table of Contents Activity of P-enolpyruvate Carboxykinase and Levels of Plasma Insulin in Common Vampire Bats (Desmodus rotundus Mariella B. Freitas, Isis C. Kettelhut, Maria A. Garofalo, Luiz Fabrizio Stoppiglia, Antônio C. Boschero, and Eliana C. Pinheiro . 1 Abstracts Presented at the XIth European Bat Research Symposium, Cluj-Napoca, Romania Compiled by Abigel Szodoray-Paradi . 7 List of Participants at the XIth European Bat Research Symposium Compiled by Abigel Szodoray-Paradi . 64 In Memoriam A Tribute to Sheila Stebbings — Conservationist Barry Collins . 71 Recent Literature Jacques Veilleux . 75 Announcements and Future Meetings . 83 Advertisement . 84 VOLUME 51: NUMBER 2 SUMMER 2010 Table of Contents Longevity Record for the Big Brown Bat (Eptesicus fuscus) Susan M. Barnard . 85 Bat-related Abstracts Presented at the 20th Colloquium on the Conservation of Mammals in the Southeastern United States, Asheville, North Carolina Compiled by Timothy C. Carter . 87 Recent Literature Margaret Griffiths . 95 Book Review Bats in Captivity: Volume 2: Aspects of Rehabilitation Edited by Susan M. Barnard Reviewed by Robert E. Stebbings . 98 Announcements and Future Meetings . 99 i BAT RESEARCH NEWS VOLUME 51: NUMBER 3 FALL 2010 Table of Contents Herniated Urinary Bladder in a Male Little Brown Myotis, Myotis lucifugus John O. Whitaker, Jr., and Angela K. Chamberlain . 101 Abstracts Presented at the 14th Australasian Bat Society Conference, Darwin, Australia Compiled by Chris Pavey . 103 List of Participants at the 14th Australasian Bat Society Conference Compiled by Chris Pavey . 129 Recent Literature Jacques Veilleux .
    [Show full text]
  • Island in the Storm: Disturbance Ecology of Plant-Visiting Bats on the Hurricane- Prone Island of Puerto Rico
    C H A P T E R 1 0 Island in the Storm: Disturbance Ecology of Plant-Visiting Bats on the Hurricane- Prone Island of Puerto Rico Michael R. Gannon and Michael R. Willig Introduction The indigenous people of the West Indies, the Taíno, had many legends to explain common natural phenomena they encountered in their existence. One of the most interesting is that of the hurricane. According to Taíno legend, in the beginning Atabei created the heavens, the Earth and other celestial bodies. Atabei had always existed. Atabei was the original mother. Atabei was the powerful creator. She had two sons named Yucajú and Guacar. Yucajú created the sun and moon to illuminate the Earth. The Earth was fertile, and from it grew plants and trees. Yucajú then created animals and birds to live among the plants and trees. Yucajú created the first man, Locuo. Locuo was happy on earth, with all the beauty that surrounded him. He knelt before Yucajú to give thanks. Guacar looked with envy on all his brother had created. He began to taint the creations of his brother. He changed his name, becoming the terrible god of evil, Juricán. Juricán carried the winds. Sometimes he carried them with such force that they destroyed what Yucajú had created. Juricán uprooted trees and killed animals. Locuo’s happiness turned to fear. He could no lon- ger enjoy the beauty of nature. (Muckley and Martínez-Santiago 1999) Today, in the West Indies, hurricanes are still the most powerful and feared natural phenomena. They are large-scale, high-intensity disturbances that regularly occur throughout the region (Weaver 1989).
    [Show full text]
  • Jamaica – an Island of Endemics
    Jamaica – An Island of Endemics Naturetrek Tour Report 3 - 11 February 2020 Reservoir at Green Castle by Andy Smith Northern Potoo by Andy Smith Jamaican Mango by Graham Croucher Report by Andy Smith Images by Graham Croucher & Andy Smith Naturetrek Mingledown Barn Wolf's Lane Chawton Alton Hampshire GU34 3HJ UK T: +44 (0)1962 733051 E: [email protected] W: www.naturetrek.co.uk Tour Report Jamaica – An Island of Endemics Tour participants: Andy Smith (Leader), Dwayne & Roger (local guides) with 15 Naturetrek clients. Day 1 Monday 3rd February We arrived at Norman Manley Airport, Kingston in the late afternoon and after negotiating airport formalities we emerged into the warm Jamaican evening, meeting our driver Trevor and began the drive to Green Castle. The journey took us around Kingston Harbour (the seventh largest natural harbour in the world according to Trevor), through parts of the city itself and then up and across the hills towards the north coast. We arrived at Green Castle at about 9pm to a warm and efficient welcome. We quickly settled in and ate a delicious late dinner before retiring for the night full of anticipation for the days ahead. Day 2 Tuesday 4th February Rain early morning then overcast with some sunny breaks; humid, warm and breezy. It was a rainy dawn after a wet and windy night. We assembled at first light for a cup of coffee and watched for a while from the terrace. The first visible birds were Jamaican Mangos and Red-billed Streamertails coming into the sugar feeders. At first they were just fleeting dark shapes but as the light improved, we began to see them more clearly.
    [Show full text]