DOCSLIB.ORG

SAS1 10.Insular Nordic

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SAS1 10.Insular Nordic Insular Nordic SAS1. April 22 nd , 2016 1 Classification of modern Nordic languages on the basis of oral similarity Model by Arne Torp Brief history Iceland The Faroe Islands 874–930: Landnám (Viking settlement) Early 9th century: Viking settlement 1200–1350: Icelandic sagas are written 1380: Norway w/colonies falls under Danish rule 1380: Norway w/colonies falls under Danish rule 1823: First (partial) Faroese Bible translation 1540: translation of the new testament into Icelandic (printed in 1584) 1845: school law (with Danish as educational language) 1816: Hið íslenzka bókmentafelag 1846: Faroese orthography 1904: Home rule (Hammershaimb ) 1911: University of Iceland 1938: Faroese allowed as school language 1918: Icelandic sovereignty 1939: Faroese allowed as church 1944: Icelandic republic language 1964: Icelandic language council 1948:Home rule. Faroese is recognized as the main language of the Faroe islands Population 2016: 332.529 1952: Føroya Fróðskaparfelag Land size: 103 000 km² 1965: University of the Faroe Islands 1985: Faroese language council Population 2014: 49 947 Land size: 1396 km² 2 The sound of Faroese: http://www.stidin.fo/FaroeseCourse/mp3/003%20p001%20Samr%C3%B8%C3%B0a%201%20%C3 %8D%20bussinum%20av%20flogv%C3%B8llinum%20til%20Havnar%20(1).mp3 The sound of Icelandic: http://icelandiconline.is/index.php Mainland Scandianavian vs. Insular Nordic Morphology: • loss of case system in Mainland Scandianavian Othography: • Insular Nordic: etymologically based orthography gives impression of insular linguistic ”unity” Vocabulary • Stronger Low German influence on Mainland Scandinavian in the Hanseatic period • Stronger lexical purism in Insular Nordic language planning, ecp. the last 150 years 3 Low German influence in Modern Norwegian and Icelandic: Skredderen tenkte at trøya passet fortreffelig, men kunden klaget og mente at plagget var kort og tøyet simpelt og grovt. De schrâder dachte dat die trôie vortreffelik paste, men de kunde klâgde und mênde dat die plagge kort was und dat tüg simpel und grof. Klæðskerinn hélt að skyrtan passaði fullkomlega, en viðskiptavinurinn kvartaði og taldi að flíkin væri stutt og efnið einfalt og gróft . Can you see features that Faroese and Icelandic share – or distinguish one from the other? Faroese: Sviar, norðmenn og danir skilja heilt væl hvønnannan.Teir hava størri trupulleikar við íslendskum, hóast íslendskt líkist tí skandinaviska málinum, ið varð tosað fyri túsund árum síðan. Næstringur hjá íslendskum er føroyskt, men málini eru ikki so lík, at ein íslendingur skilir ein føroying uttan trupulleikar. Icelandic parallel text: Svíar, Norðmenn og Danir skilja hver annan nokkuð auðveldlega. Þeir eiga í meiri vandræðum með íslensku þrátt fyrir að íslenskan líkist skandinavíska málinu sem talað var fyrir þúsund árum síðan. Nánasti ættingi íslenskunnar er færeyskan en tungumálin líkjast þó hvort öðru ekki svo mjög að Íslendingur geti skilið Færeying án vandræða. Rough translation: Swedes, Norwegians and Danes understand each other quite easily. They have more difficulties with Icelandic even though Icelandic resembles the Scandinavian language spoken a 1000 years ago. The closest relative to Icelandic is Faroese, but they are not so similar that Icelanders understand Faroese without difficulties. 4 Faroese : Finskt minnir um estiskt, men har er eisini skilskapur við sámisku málini. Í bæði finskum og sámiskum kann en til dømis skapa long orð við at leggja bendingar aftrat stovninum. Men viðvíkjandi longum orðum er grønlendskt heilt serstakt. Har øðrum málum tørvar eina heila meining, er ofta nóg mikið við einum einasta grønlendska orði. Icelandic : Finnskan minnir á eistnesku en á einnig ýmislegt sameiginlegt með samísku. Í bæði finnsku og samísku getur maður til dæmis myndað löng orð með því að bæta beygingarendingum við rót orðsins. Það er samt grænlenskan sem er í sérflokki hvað varðar löng orð. Meðan önnur tungumál nota heila setningu nægir stundum eitt grænlenskt orð. Rough translation: Finnish has many similarities with Estonian, but has at the same time many things in common with Sami languages. In both Finnish and Sami you can make long word by adding morphological endings to the root of the word. At the same time it is Greenlandic that stands out regarding long words. When other languages need a whole sentence, it is often enough with one single Greenlandic word. Just an example of Greenlandic word formation aagussaq noun en ting der kommer til syne efter at sneen er smeltet ‘a thing that appears after the snow has melted’ Download free app: oqaasileriffik 5 Early influences on Icelandic and Faroese • Celtic: Kjartan , Njáll , Dímon and slafak (‘water- cotton’ = seaweed)(Ice.); Dímun (Fo) and dunna (Anas platyrhynchos)(Fo). • Christianity brings new words: kirkja , prestur , biskup (of Latin and Greek origin) – Also English words: synd (sin) and guðspjall (gospel) – Translations of the Bible bring in new words (NT 1540), (Icelandic Bible 1584) • French words on court and knightship – kurteis (Ice. courteous), silki (silk) Low German and Danish loanwords Low German loanwords in Icelandic – through trade connections and Danish through governmental language – blífa (bleiben, blive) → verða – þenkja (denken, tænke) → hugsa – bífala (befehlen, befale) → skipa – makt (Macht, magt) → vald 6 The Faroes Faroese population • 1801: 5300 inhabitants • 1901: 15.200 • 1945: 29.200 • 1960: 34.600 • 1989: 47.900 • 1990–1995: economic crisis and 10% emigrated • 2010: 49.050 • 2014: 49.947:19.300 in Tórshavn Number of speakers: 75.000 7 Faroese - summary • Faroese is the closest relative to Icelandic, and like Icelandic, it has developed from Old West Norse (West Scandinavian), which Norwegian settlers brought with them during the Viking Age • Very few documents exist that were written in the Faroe Islands in the Old Norse period, but the few that have been found show that the language was quite close to the literary language in Norway at the time • We still see similarities between Norwegian (esp. south- western Norwegian dialects) and Faroese • Similar vocabulary to Norwegian • Celtic languages also influenced Faroese – some of the settlers were descendants of Norwegian settlers from the Irish Sea, and some had taken wives from Norse Ireland, Orkney or Shetland before coming to the Faroes. • Words of Celtic origin are still found in the language. For example, there are two Faroese words for duck, one from Norse and one from Gaelic. 8 • The Faroe Islands became a part of the Kingdom of Norway in 1035, and when Norway and Denmark entered into a union, the Danes took over the administration and used their own language, both spoken and written • After the Denmark-Norway union dissolved in 1814, The Faroe Islands were ceded to Denmark, and are still a part of the Kingdom of Denmark. • The Danes outlawed the use of Faroese in schools, churches and official documents – eventually the written language died out, yet there was still a rich spoken tradition and the language survived as a collection of spoken dialects, just like Norwegian did • In the decades around 1800, Faroese ballads started being written down, which was the beginning of the revival of written Faroese • Since the language had not been written in almost three centuries, there was a need for a Faroese orthography (standardized spelling). • In 1854, a written standard for Modern Faroese was written, and it still exists today. The spelling was brought as close to Old Norse and Icelandic as possible, even though oral Faroese had gone through several changes since medieval times and was not as similar to Old Norse as it had been the last time a written language had been in use. Because of this, there were (and still are – this orthography is still used today) differences between the written and the oral language which highlight the changes that have taken place in oral Faroese, and which also make it difficult to learn Faroese spelling, even for the Faroese themselves. Even so, the Faroese do not want to change their orthography to make it more phonetic/similar to the spoken language – there have been reform proposals, but they've never won public approval. They still want to keep this orthography which is similar to Icelandic and Old Norse 9 • Purism - they don't want a lot of foreign influence on the language, and they have a quite restrictive attitude towards loan words, although not to the degree that Icelanders do • Faroese became an official language in 1948, when the Faroe Islands became self-governing/ an autonomous province of the Kingdom of Denmark. • Today, Faroese is dominant in speech and in writing in the Faroe Islands, but Danish is still an official language there and everyone has to learn it V.U. Hammershaimb • Danish written language, many dialects and folk songs written down with phonological spelling • 1846: V.U. Hammershaimb introduces a spelling norm and Faroese becomes a modern written language (not oral norm) • Cooperation with Jón Sigurðsson og C.C. Rafn • etymological orthography → great gap between speech and written form, but great consensus 10 Jakob Jakobsen (1864–1918) • tried to introduce a more phonological spelling, but failed • mainly concerned by the vocabulary and all the “danismer” (loanwords from Danish). Many words with affixes like an-, be-, for-, -het and -else had Faroese equivalents, but with negative connotations • he was the first purist: new words in new domains → neologisms and many translation loans: eftirspurningur (‘etterspørsel’: demand), tollkrevjari (‘toller’: customs officer),
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Student Handbook
    2018/2019 Student Handbook . University of the Faroe Islands 2018/2019 1 2 INTRODUCTION Dear student, Welcome to the University of the Faroe Islands. You are now embarking upon a new period of your life, where you have chosen to attend university. Our wish is that your time spent studying here will be positive, instructive, and stimulating. At the University of the Faroe Islands it is important to us that as a student you feel as welcome as possible, that you receive a great start to your studies and good studying habits, that your well-being is a priority, and that your time spent at the university will be both challenging, constructive, and exciting. We encourage you as a student to be active, to participate in social activities or events, and to bring your own personal contribution to a good and constructive academic environment, so that you play a part in promoting well-being – both for yourself and for your fellow students. It is, among others, productive students who have helped making the university known for being a good place to study. The fact that the various offered programmes are located at several separate places in the city, makes it even more necessary that the students and staff participate in communal arrangements for everyone, and thereby play their part in developing a feeling of communal identity and increased well-being. The staff at the university is also there to help, guide, and support you in reaching your educational goals. Those who are first and foremost available to you are: the department offices, the Student Services Centre and the student counsellors.
    [Show full text]
  • The Postcolonial North Atlantic Iceland, Greenland and the Faroe Islands
    The Postcolonial North Atlantic Iceland, Greenland and the Faroe Islands Edited by Lill-Ann Körber and Ebbe Volquardsen Nordeuropa-Institut der Humboldt-Universität Berlin Table of Contents EBBE VOLQUARDSEN/LILL-ANN KÖRBER The Postcolonial North Atlantic: An Introduction WILLIAM FROST The Concept of the North Atlantic Rim; or, Questioning the North Iceland GUÐMUNDUR HÁLFDANARSON Iceland Perceived: Nordic, European or a Colonial Other? KRISTÍN LOFTSDÓTTIR Icelandic Identities in a Postcolonial Context ANN-SOFIE NIELSEN GREMAUD Iceland as Centre and Periphery: Postcolonial and Crypto-colonial Perspectives REINHARD HENNIG Postcolonial Ecology: An Ecocritical Reading of Andri Snær Magnason’s Dreamland: A Self-Help Manual for a Frightened Nation () HELGA BIRGISDÓTTIR Searching for a Home, Searching for a Language: Jón Sveinsson, the Nonni Books and Identity Formation DAGNÝ KRISTJÁNSDÓTTIR Guðríður Símonardóttir: The Suspect Victim of the Turkish Abductions in the th Century Faroe IslanDs BERGUR RØNNE MOBERG The Faroese Rest in the West: Danish-Faroese World Literature between Postcolonialism and Western Modernism 6 TABLE OF CONTENTS MALAN MARNERSDÓTTIR Translations of William Heinesen – a Post-colonial Experience CHRISTIAN REBHAN Postcolonial Politics and the Debates on Membership in the European Communities in the Faroe Islands (–) JOHN K. MITCHINSON Othering the Other: Language Decolonisation in the Faroe Islands ANNE-KARI SKARÐHAMAR To Be or Not to Be a Nation: Representations of Decolonisation and Faroese Nation Building in Gunnar Hoydal’s Novel Í havsins hjarta () Greenland BIRGIT KLEIST PEDERSEN Greenlandic Images and the Post-colonial: Is it such a Big Deal after all? CHRISTINA JUST A Short Story of the Greenlandic Theatre: From Fjaltring, Jutland, to the National Theatre in Nuuk, Greenland KIRSTEN THISTED Politics, Oil and Rock ‘n’ Roll.
    [Show full text]
  • Germanic Standardizations: Past to Present (Impact: Studies in Language and Society)
    <DOCINFO AUTHOR ""TITLE "Germanic Standardizations: Past to Present"SUBJECT "Impact 18"KEYWORDS ""SIZE HEIGHT "220"WIDTH "150"VOFFSET "4"> Germanic Standardizations Impact: Studies in language and society impact publishes monographs, collective volumes, and text books on topics in sociolinguistics. The scope of the series is broad, with special emphasis on areas such as language planning and language policies; language conflict and language death; language standards and language change; dialectology; diglossia; discourse studies; language and social identity (gender, ethnicity, class, ideology); and history and methods of sociolinguistics. General Editor Associate Editor Annick De Houwer Elizabeth Lanza University of Antwerp University of Oslo Advisory Board Ulrich Ammon William Labov Gerhard Mercator University University of Pennsylvania Jan Blommaert Joseph Lo Bianco Ghent University The Australian National University Paul Drew Peter Nelde University of York Catholic University Brussels Anna Escobar Dennis Preston University of Illinois at Urbana Michigan State University Guus Extra Jeanine Treffers-Daller Tilburg University University of the West of England Margarita Hidalgo Vic Webb San Diego State University University of Pretoria Richard A. Hudson University College London Volume 18 Germanic Standardizations: Past to Present Edited by Ana Deumert and Wim Vandenbussche Germanic Standardizations Past to Present Edited by Ana Deumert Monash University Wim Vandenbussche Vrije Universiteit Brussel/FWO-Vlaanderen John Benjamins Publishing Company Amsterdam/Philadelphia TM The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements 8 of American National Standard for Information Sciences – Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ansi z39.48-1984. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Germanic standardizations : past to present / edited by Ana Deumert, Wim Vandenbussche.
    [Show full text]
  • The Icelandic Language at the Time of the Reformation: Some Reflections on Translations, Language and Foreign Influences
    THE ICELANDIC LANGUAGE AT THE TIME OF THE REFORMATION: SOME REFLECTIONS ON TRANSLATIONS, LANGUAGE AND FOREIGN INFLUENCES Veturliði Óskarsson (Uppsala University) Abstract The process of the Reformation in Iceland in its narrow sense is framed by the publication of the New Testament in 1540 and the whole Bible in 1584. It is sometimes believed that Icelandic language would have changed more than what it has, if these translations had not seen the day. During the 16th century, in all 51 books in Icelandic were printed. Almost all are translations, mostly from German. These books contain many loanwords, chiefly of German origin. These words are often a direct result of the Reformation, but some of them are considerably older. As an example, words with the German prefix be- were discussed to some length in the article. Some loanwords from the 16th century have lived on to our time, but many were either wiped out in the Icelandic language purism of the nineteenth and twentieth century, or never became an integrated part of the language, outside of religious and official texts. Some words even only show up in one or two books of the 16th century. The impact of the Reformation on the future development of the Icelandic language, other than a temporary one on the lexicon was limited, and influence on the (spoken) language of common people was probably little. Keywords The Icelandic Reformation, printed books, the New Testament, the Bible, loanwords, the German prefix be-. Introduction The Reformation in Iceland is dated to the year 1550, when the last Catholic bishop in Iceland, Jón Arason of the Hólar diocese in Northern Iceland, was executed.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER SEVENTEEN History of the German Language 1 Indo
    CHAPTER SEVENTEEN History of the German Language 1 Indo-European and Germanic Background Indo-European Background It has already been mentioned in this course that German and English are related languages. Two languages can be related to each other in much the same way that two people can be related to each other. If two people share a common ancestor, say their mother or their great-grandfather, then they are genetically related. Similarly, German and English are genetically related because they share a common ancestor, a language which was spoken in what is now northern Germany sometime before the Angles and the Saxons migrated to England. We do not have written records of this language, unfortunately, but we have a good idea of what it must have looked and sounded like. We have arrived at our conclusions as to what it looked and sounded like by comparing the sounds of words and morphemes in earlier written stages of English and German (and Dutch) and in modern-day English and German dialects. As a result of the comparisons we are able to reconstruct what the original language, called a proto-language, must have been like. This particular proto-language is usually referred to as Proto-West Germanic. The method of reconstruction based on comparison is called the comparative method. If faced with two languages the comparative method can tell us one of three things: 1) the two languages are related in that both are descended from a common ancestor, e.g. German and English, 2) the two are related in that one is the ancestor of the other, e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Looking for Parametric Correlations Within Faroese Höskuldur Thráinsson University of Iceland
    Looking for parametric correlations within Faroese Höskuldur Thráinsson University of Iceland Abstract: This paper first reviews some parameters that have been suggested to account for variation within Scandinavian, focussing for concreteness on the parameters proposed by Holmberg and Platzack (1995) and Bobaljik and Thráinsson (1998). As this review shows, Faroese is not as well behaved as the parametric approach to Scandinavian syntax would lead us to expect. In addition, the variation found within Faroese syntax is often gradient and not as categorical as the conventional parametric approach to variation would predict. Yet it can be shown that some of the correlations predicted by Holmberg and Platzack’s (1995) Agr Parameter and Bobaljik and Thráinsson’s (1998) Split IP Parameter are found in Faroese syntax and they are turn out to be statistically significant. In the final section it is argued that to account for facts of this sort we need to revise our ideas about parametric variation, language acquisition and the nature of internalized grammars — and that this will be necessary regardless of what we think of the particular formulation of parameters assumed by Holmberg and Platzack on the one hand and Bobaljik and Thráinsson on the other. 1. Parametric variation in Scandinavian syntax1 1.1. The agreement parameter and the case parameter In their comparative work on Scandinavian around 1990, which culminated in their influential book On the Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax (1995), Holmberg and Platzack (henceforth H&P or P&H, depending on the order of authors in the relevant publications) divide the Scandinavian languages into two main groups, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Faroe Islands and Greenland 2008
    N O R D I C M E D I A T R E N D S 10 Media and Communication Statistics Faroe Islands and Greenland 2008 Compiled by Ragnar Karlsson NORDICOM UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG 2008 NORDICOM’s activities are based on broad and extensive network of contacts and collaboration with members of the research community, media companies, politicians, regulators, teachers, librarians, and so forth, around the world. The activities at Nordicom are characterized by three main working areas. Media and Communication Research Findings in the Nordic Countries Nordicom publishes a Nordic journal, Nordicom Information, and an English language journal, Nordicom Review (refereed), as well as anthologies and other reports in both Nordic and English langu- ages. Different research databases concerning, among other things, scientific literature and ongoing research are updated continuously and are available on the Internet. Nordicom has the character of a hub of Nordic cooperation in media research. Making Nordic research in the field of mass communication and media studies known to colleagues and others outside the region, and weaving and supporting networks of collaboration between the Nordic research communities and colleagues abroad are two prime facets of the Nordicom work. The documentation services are based on work performed in national documentation centres at- tached to the universities in Aarhus, Denmark; Tampere, Finland; Reykjavik, Iceland; Bergen, Norway; and Göteborg, Sweden. Trends and Developments in the Media Sectors in the Nordic Countries Nordicom compiles and collates media statistics for the whole of the Nordic region. The statistics, to- gether with qualified analyses, are published in the series, Nordic Media Trends, and on the homepage.
    [Show full text]
  • THE FUTURE of the BANTU LANGUAGES by W
    THE FUTURE OF THE BANTU LANGUAGES By W. B. LOCKWOOD T^HE Freedom Charter adopted by the Congress of the People at Kliptown, Johannesburg, contains the demand that "All people shall have equal right to use their own languages." Of latef this question of language has been very much to the fore in South Africa, where it has been discussed in the progressive press and elsewhere, and very different views have been expressed. Recently, D. T. Cole, a lecturer in Bantu languages at the Wit- watersrand University, wrote an article in Forum (Vol. 3, No. 2) dealing with the problem of the exceptional linguistic diversity in South Africa. His article is symptomatic of the confusion in the minds of many people, including well-wishers of the African, and it will not be out of place to consider his opinions. Cole envisages for the Bantu languages a policy of linguistic unifica­ tion which in the distant future might lead to the creation of two major Bantu languages. These two could then be "offered" official status which, says Cole, is out of the question for any Bantu language, at the moment. Cole is led to this view by his general conception of the Bantu languages: "It is not an economic proposition, from any point of view, to maintain our seven literary Bantu forms as separate languages, nor to offer them anything like the status of English or Afrikaans ... In addition . there are numerous lesser languages . whose small populations do not warrant (literary) development." For these patronis­ ing assumptions Cole does not, however, advance any evidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Indo-European Linguistics: an Introduction Indo-European Linguistics an Introduction
    This page intentionally left blank Indo-European Linguistics The Indo-European language family comprises several hun- dred languages and dialects, including most of those spoken in Europe, and south, south-west and central Asia. Spoken by an estimated 3 billion people, it has the largest number of native speakers in the world today. This textbook provides an accessible introduction to the study of the Indo-European proto-language. It clearly sets out the methods for relating the languages to one another, presents an engaging discussion of the current debates and controversies concerning their clas- sification, and offers sample problems and suggestions for how to solve them. Complete with a comprehensive glossary, almost 100 tables in which language data and examples are clearly laid out, suggestions for further reading, discussion points and a range of exercises, this text will be an essential toolkit for all those studying historical linguistics, language typology and the Indo-European proto-language for the first time. james clackson is Senior Lecturer in the Faculty of Classics, University of Cambridge, and is Fellow and Direc- tor of Studies, Jesus College, University of Cambridge. His previous books include The Linguistic Relationship between Armenian and Greek (1994) and Indo-European Word For- mation (co-edited with Birgit Anette Olson, 2004). CAMBRIDGE TEXTBOOKS IN LINGUISTICS General editors: p. austin, j. bresnan, b. comrie, s. crain, w. dressler, c. ewen, r. lass, d. lightfoot, k. rice, i. roberts, s. romaine, n. v. smith Indo-European Linguistics An Introduction In this series: j. allwood, l.-g. anderson and o.¨ dahl Logic in Linguistics d.
    [Show full text]
  • Spelling Progress Bulletin Summer 1977 P2 in the Printed Version]
    Spelling Progress Bulletin Summer, 1977 Dedicated to finding the causes of difficulties in learning reading and spelling. Summer, 1977. Publisht quarterly Editor and General Manager, Assistant Editor, Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter. Newell W. Tune, Helen Bonnema Bisgard, Subscription $ 3. 00 a year. 5848 Alcove Ave, 13618 E. Bethany Pl, #307 Volume XVII, no. 2 No. Hollywood, Calif. 91607 Denver, Colo, 80232 Editorial Board: Emmett A. Betts, Helen Bonnema, Godfrey Dewey, Wilbur J. Kupfrian, William J. Reed, Ben D. Wood, Harvie Barnard. Table of Contents 1. Spelling and Phonics II, by Emmett Albert Betts, Ph.D., LL.D. 2. Sounds and Phonograms I (Grapho-Phoneme Variables), by Emmett A. Betts, Ph.D. 3. Sounds and Phonograms II (Variant Spellings), by Emmett Albert Betts, Ph.D, LL.D. 4. Sounds and Phonograms III (Variant Spellings), by Emmett Albert Betts, Ph.D, LL.D. 5. The Development of Danish Orthography, by Mogens Jansen & Tom Harpøth. 6. The Holiday, by Frank T. du Feu. 7. A Decade of Achievement with i. t. a., by John Henry Martin. 8. Ten Years with i. t. a. in California, by Eva Boyd. 9. Logic and Good Judgement needed in Selecting the Symbols to Represent the Sounds of Spoken English, by Newell W. Tune. 10. Criteria for Selecting a System of Reformed Spelling for a Permanent Reform, by Newell W. Tune. 11. Those Dropping Test Scores, by Harvie Barnard. 12. Why Johnny Still Can't Learn to Read, by Newell W. Tune. 13. A Condensed Summary of Reasons For and Against Orthographic Simplification, by Harvie Barnard. 14. An Explanation of Vowels Followed by /r/ in World English Spelling (I.
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Determination and Sub-Sovereign Statehood in the EU with Particular Reference to Scotland and Passing Reference to the Faroe Islands L
    Alasdair Geater and Scott Crosbyt Self-determination and Sub-sovereign Statehood in the EU with particular reference to Scotland and passing reference to the Faroe Islands l. Points of Departure II. Fear of Freedom III. Self-Determination as a Fundamental Human Right IV. Arguments of Dissuasion and their Rebuttal On the perceived dangers of nationafis m On the perceived risk of economic isolation On the fe ar of fragmentation IV. The Exercise of the Right of Self-determination under EU Law VI. The Importance of History VII. The Particular Case of Scotland Historical Constitutional Consequences of Scottish Statehood The Process The benefits of statehood ? 1 Partners respectively in Geater and Co and Stanbrook & Hooper, Brussels and faunding partners of Geater & Crosby, a joint venture devoted to Scots constitutional law, also based in Brussels. The seeds for this discourse were sown in a leeture in 1975 by Professor Neil MacCormick, then ayoung Dean of the Faculty of Law at Edinburgh University, which the younger of the co­ authors attended (and remembered). Føroyskt L6gar Rit (Faroese Law Review) vol. 1 no. 1 - 2001 "In a united Europe every small country can find its place alongside the former great powers" 2 Føroyskt Urtak Heiti: Sjalvsavgeroarrættur og at vera statur f ES viiJ partvisum fullveldi, vio serligum atliti til Skotlands, men eisini vio atliti til Føroya. Greinin vioger [ heimspekiligum og politiskum høpi tjdningin av, at tj6oir, sum nu eru i felagskapi viiJ aorar i ES, faa fullveldi og egnan ES-limaskap. Høvundarnir halda uppa, at tao er 6missandi rættur f fullum samsvari vio ES-Sattmalan hja hesum tj6oum at faa egnan ES-limaskap.
    [Show full text]
  • The Position of Frisian in the Germanic Language Area Charlotte
    The Position of Frisian in the Germanic Language Area Charlotte Gooskens and Wilbert Heeringa 1. Introduction Among the Germanic varieties the Frisian varieties in the Dutch province of Friesland have their own position. The Frisians are proud of their language and more than 350,000 inhabitants of the province of Friesland speak Frisian every day. Heeringa (2004) shows that among the dialects in the Dutch language area the Frisian varieties are most distant with respect to standard Dutch. This may justify the fact that Frisian is recognized as a second official language in the Netherlands. In addition to Frisian, in some towns and on some islands a mixed variety is used which is an intermediate form between Frisian and Dutch. The variety spoken in the Frisian towns is known as Town Frisian1. The Frisian language has existed for more than 2000 years. Genetically the Frisian dialects are most closely related to the English language. However, historical events have caused the English and the Frisian language to diverge, while Dutch and Frisian have converged. The linguistic distance to the other Germanic languages has also altered in the course of history due to different degrees of linguistic contact. As a result traditional genetic trees do not give an up-to-date representation of the distance between the modern Germanic languages. In the present investigation we measured linguistic distances between Frisian and the other Germanic languages in order to get an impression of the effect of genetic relationship and language contact for the position of the modern Frisian language on the Germanic language map.
    [Show full text]