DOCSLIB.ORG

Some Notes on the “Macedonian Issue” to Share the Means of Struggle in Order to Abolish the States, the Capital and the Bord

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Some Notes on the “Macedonian Issue” to Share the Means of Struggle in Order to Abolish the States, the Capital and the Bord Some notes on the “Macedonian issue” to share the means of struggle in order to abolish the states, the capital and the borders in the Balkan area and all over the world What’s happening on the southern Balkan Peninsula in the early 2018 Under the pressure and after exhortations of NATO, but also by the will of Greek and Macedonian governments for a solution to be found, awareness has been risen once again around the issue of national naming of the neighboring country, their language and their state. Alongside, on the one hand there has been a burst of nationalism and theories about “non-liberated Greek/Macedonian lands” and on the other questions have been risen about what NATO’s intentions really are, due to the pressure that is put on this matter, or with one phrase: “Which interests and which forces are into conflict around the naming issue of our neighbors?” And no matter how clear are NATO’s intentions to increase its influence and power on the Balkan area, it is also very important to see what interests, which forces and what fables/myths surround the fact that hundreds of free buses brought all the christian flocks, all the members of conservative forces, patriots, nationalists, nazis, centrists, rightists, even leftists in the demonstrations of Thessaloniki and Athens. In spite the demonstrations haven’t reached the desirable numbers of their “non-party-member” coordinators, there were a few thousands of people that where chanting national and polemical marches. A complete satisfying audience for every Fragoulis, every Anthimos, every Mikis of this land, either to close their life circle as disgracefully as they lived the last decades, participating in a government with ND (New Democracy) for example in 1989, or to officially begin their political career “flirting” with businessmen while watching football matches. This is the very same crowd that let the necessary vital space on organized fascists of this land and their affiliated groups, in order to strike structures and people of the movement, something that unfortunately left Libertatia squat burnt to the ground, a fact in which we should put a lot of think on and we should organize our counter-attack. At the same time the movements have gained useful experience not only from the successful actions of anti-nationalist propaganda in the two big cities and the rest of the country, that didn’t left space for the racist/nationalist propaganda to be spread, but also from all the other actions that took place these days: antifascist patrols, moto-demos, wide flyer distribution, combat actions, graffiti, posters, anti-nationalist demonstrations, combative collective self-defense against the attack on the self- organized theater “Empros” in Athens and the Free Social Space “Sholeio for the learning of freedom” in Thessaloniki, self-defense of the spaces and the neighborhoods that we live and fight together, either we are “locals” or “foreigners”. There are lot that need to be said and many more that need to be done against the states, the bosses, the fascists. And we will do it. But first let’s put our “class glasses” and have a look on the history of our area taking things from the top. In a period, similar to the current, when Greeks were not the only ones that lived on the region of the contemporary Greek state, and Greek was not the only language being spoken... The settlement of Slavs on the Byzantine Empire region “Neither plague nor cholera have done that bad to humanity as historians and history have done” Giannis Skarimpas In the early years of the Byzantine Empire, during the massive immigration and not later than the middle 6th century when we find the first recorded reports for their existence in the byzantine region, Slavic tribes were looting, at first, and some decades later have settled in southern areas of the Balkan region. From Peloponnisos to Giannena and from the current Greek west to the central and east Macedonia there are thousands of Slavs that are going to create, on the alpine areas initially and later on the lowlands, small communities. On the stint of time, big parts of their population were Christianized while they were continuously swapping between resisting and being subject to the byzantine power, between declaring war, seizing Thessaloniki and defending its grounds, while being violently moved by the order of Byzantine Emperors to the Anadolu (Mikra Asia). At that time they began to live and mix among other nations that were residents to the region. Ottoman period The years before and after the fall of Istanbul on 1453, the biggest part of the Balkans passed under the control of Ottoman empire. The sultans, not being able to turn such a big part of population into Islam - something that would be able to cause trouble and corrosion for the empire – imposed taxes, giving religious independence to the subject populations, as long as they would have the religion leaders under their command and control. Later they passed the administrative initiation to the so called millets – executive subdivision of the empire – which required from their subjects to be from the same religion. Binding element of these populations was the fact that they were Christians, Jewish, Armenian or Muslims. So alongside the Christian millet, millets like the Jewish and the Armenian were created, although the first would have more privileges in front of the sultan, while progressively the archbishop of Istanbul would be designated as the “national leader” of all christian population, by absorbing the rest of the patriarchates. The Slav-speaking and Greek-speaking populations (alongside the Jewish, the Armenian and the Turkish) continue to live together for hundreds of years under the Sultan, among periods of peace, war and even revolt against them. *At this point it would be good to mention that, opposing the current perception around the nation, that ignores the historical needs which gave birth to it by using many historical inaccuracies and many lies, medieval empires were multinational and multiracial, with binding element, not in all of the occasions, the loyalty to the emperor, the religion and only in a few occasions the common language. Distinctive example is that in periods of the byzantine empire, someone being called a “Greek” meant being a heathen and furthermore some of the byzantine emperors were of different nationality (Greek, Latin, Arabic etc) The beginning of the end of the multinational The insurrection of Ilinden empires At the late 19th century all the vultures competed The evolution of technology, the transformation each other over the division of the territories of on the relations of production, the gradually rise the collapsing ottoman empire. The Macedonian of the bourgeois on power and the abolishment region was divided in three geographic of imperial and monarchic systems have already apartments-villayets (Thessaloniki, Monasteri- begun during the 18th century. In the weaker part Bitola, Kosovo). Bulgaria, Greece, Serbia even of the imperial world, the Ottoman empire, there Romania were trying to put their own teachers were no difference on this process despite the and their own priests in every village in order to different time and quality of the events. create their own national consciousness on the local population, while Christians have been Since 1804’s Serbian revolution, 1821’s Greek already divided to those who were under the revolution and the participation of Bulgaria on influence of the patriarchate – something that the Russian side in the Russian-Turkish wars – didn’t require for them to speak Greek or being and the creation of Bulgarian state on 1878 – self-characterized as Greeks – and those who things are getting clearer. were under the influence of the Exarchate – which didn’t require for them to speak Bulgarian The divided empire gave its place to new or being self-characterized as Bulgarians . national states which would fight each other over larger territorial gain (often with the influence of And while the neighboring states were getting the Constantinople Patriarchate – which ready to feast on the next outbreak, the Internal primarily represented the Greek and orthodox Macedonian Revolutionary Organization populations — over the other patriarchates that (VMRO) is being divided. Although it begun as claimed both their religious and administrative an organization that was willing to bring the autonomy, something that the Bulgarian Macedonian region under Bulgarian influence or patriarchate would achieve in 1870). occupation, a big majority of its members turns into socialist ideas and starts talking about an Even if the creation of national states was an autonomous Macedonia which would belong to effect of economical and social rearrangements those that live in it (of all the nationalities and of and conflicts that lasted hundreds of years, the all the religions) inside a Balkan federation. co-existence, also for hundreds of years, of people of different origins, religions, and On July of 1903, hundreds of farmers and languages had deeply influenced the workers, mostly Slavic-speaking but also Greek- revolutionary ideas of that era. Early socialist speaking, Albanian-speaking and Vlachic- ideas with a tone of unspecified “pan- speaking, got armed against the ottoman Balkanism” can be met on lots of radical trends oppression. The participation of farmers with of that period, such as “Democratic Eastern “Greek national consciousness”, disappoints the Federation”, of which the Greek part was named Greek consultants and agents of the region, and “Political Association Rigas”. “Rigas” referred leads them to cooperate with the sultan, to Rigas Velestinlis (Fereos), who supported the providing information for the repression of the pan-Balkan insurrection against the ottoman insurrection, while the so-called “Macedonian- oppression and the creation of a multinational fighter” Strebeniotis with the support of an and multi-religious state, in front of which all ottoman division attacked the rebels.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ethnic Cleansing in the Balkans
    CICERO FOUNDATION GREAT DEBATE PAPER No. 13 / 04 November 2013 ETHNIC CLEANSING IN THE BALKANS WHY DID IT HAPPEN AND COULD IT HAPPEN AGAIN? PAUL MOJZES Rosemont College Rosemont, Pennsylvania, U.S.A. Cicero Foundation Great Debate Paper No. 13/04 © Paul Mojzes, 2013 All rights reserved The Cicero Foundation is an independent pro-Atlantic and pro-EU think tank. www.cicerofoundation.org The views expressed in Cicero Foundation Great Debate Papers do not necessarily express the opinion of the Cicero Foundation, but they are considered interesting and thought-provoking enough to be published. Permission to make digital or hard copies of any information contained in these web publications is granted for personal use, without fee and without formal request. Full citation and copyright notice must appear on the first page. Copies may not be made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage. The Cicero Foundation FRANCE THE NETHERLANDS 13, rue Washington Hondertmarck D 45 75008 PARIS 6211 MB MAASTRICHT Tel. +33 1 45 62 05 90 Tel. +31 43 32 60 602 Fax +33 1 45 62 05 30 Fax +31 43 32 60 828 Email [email protected] [email protected] 2 Ethnic Cleansing in the Balkans: Why Did It Happen And Could It Happen Again? Paul Mojzes Introduction In the writing of my book, Balkan Genocides: Holocaust and Ethnic Cleansing in the Twentieth Century ,(1) among the many definitions of genocide, I followed the formally adopted definition of the 1948 United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. This definition was my primary guide in determining which of the many conflicts in the Balkans during the 20th Century were genocidal.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shaping of Bulgarian and Serbian National Identities, 1800S-1900S
    The Shaping of Bulgarian and Serbian National Identities, 1800s-1900s February 2003 Katrin Bozeva-Abazi Department of History McGill University, Montreal A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 1 Contents 1. Abstract/Resume 3 2. Note on Transliteration and Spelling of Names 6 3. Acknowledgments 7 4. Introduction 8 How "popular" nationalism was created 5. Chapter One 33 Peasants and intellectuals, 1830-1914 6. Chapter Two 78 The invention of the modern Balkan state: Serbia and Bulgaria, 1830-1914 7. Chapter Three 126 The Church and national indoctrination 8. Chapter Four 171 The national army 8. Chapter Five 219 Education and national indoctrination 9. Conclusions 264 10. Bibliography 273 Abstract The nation-state is now the dominant form of sovereign statehood, however, a century and a half ago the political map of Europe comprised only a handful of sovereign states, very few of them nations in the modern sense. Balkan historiography often tends to minimize the complexity of nation-building, either by referring to the national community as to a monolithic and homogenous unit, or simply by neglecting different social groups whose consciousness varied depending on region, gender and generation. Further, Bulgarian and Serbian historiography pay far more attention to the problem of "how" and "why" certain events have happened than to the emergence of national consciousness of the Balkan peoples as a complex and durable process of mental evolution. This dissertation on the concept of nationality in which most Bulgarians and Serbs were educated and socialized examines how the modern idea of nationhood was disseminated among the ordinary people and it presents the complicated process of national indoctrination carried out by various state institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Blood Ties: Religion, Violence, and the Politics of Nationhood in Ottoman Macedonia, 1878
    BLOOD TIES BLOOD TIES Religion, Violence, and the Politics of Nationhood in Ottoman Macedonia, 1878–1908 I˙pek Yosmaog˘lu Cornell University Press Ithaca & London Copyright © 2014 by Cornell University All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in a review, this book, or parts thereof, must not be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from the publisher. For information, address Cornell University Press, Sage House, 512 East State Street, Ithaca, New York 14850. First published 2014 by Cornell University Press First printing, Cornell Paperbacks, 2014 Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Yosmaog˘lu, I˙pek, author. Blood ties : religion, violence,. and the politics of nationhood in Ottoman Macedonia, 1878–1908 / Ipek K. Yosmaog˘lu. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-8014-5226-0 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN 978-0-8014-7924-3 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Macedonia—History—1878–1912. 2. Nationalism—Macedonia—History. 3. Macedonian question. 4. Macedonia—Ethnic relations. 5. Ethnic conflict— Macedonia—History. 6. Political violence—Macedonia—History. I. Title. DR2215.Y67 2013 949.76′01—dc23 2013021661 Cornell University Press strives to use environmentally responsible suppliers and materials to the fullest extent possible in the publishing of its books. Such materials include vegetable-based, low-VOC inks and acid-free papers that are recycled, totally chlorine-free, or partly composed of nonwood fibers. For further information, visit our website at www.cornellpress.cornell.edu. Cloth printing 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Paperback printing 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 To Josh Contents Acknowledgments ix Note on Transliteration xiii Introduction 1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • IX. Nationale Ansprüche, Konflikte Und Entwicklungen in Makedonien
    IX. Nationale Ansprüche, Konflikte und Entwicklungen in !akedonien, 1870–1912 Vasilis K. Gounaris 1. Vom bulgarischen Exarchat bis zur bulgarischen Autonomie Kraft des ersten Artikels des Firmans des Sultans vom 27. Februar (nach dem alten Kalender) 1870 wurde ohne Wissen des Patriarchats das bulgarische Exarchat gegründet. Von den 13 Kirchenprovinzen, die in seine Verantwortung übergingen, könnte man nur die Metropolis von Velesa rein formell als makedonisch bezeichnen. Doch gemäß dem zehnten Artikel des Firmans konnten auch andere Metropoleis dem Exarchat beitreten, wenn dies mindestens zwei Drittel ihrer Gemeindemitglieder wünschten. Dieser Firman gilt als die Geburtsurkunde der Makedonischen Frage, was jedoch nicht zutrifft. Die Voraussetzungen für die Entstehung feindlicher Parteien und die Nationalisierung dieser Gegensätze waren Produkt der poli- tischen, sozialen und wirtschaftlichen Umschichtungen, die der Erlass Hatt-i Humayun (Februar 1856) mit sich gebracht hatte. Dieser Erlass hatte zu Veränderungen des Grund- besitzsystems zu Gunsten der Christen geführt und die çifliks offiziell vererblich gemacht. Er hatte auch die Voraussetzungen für öffentliche Arbeiten und für eine Änderung des Steuer- und des Kreditsystems geschaffen. Und schließlich war, im Rahmen der Abfassung von Rechtskodizes, vom Patriarchat die Abfassung allgemeiner Verordnungen für die Verwaltung der Orthodoxen unter Mitwirkung von Laien verlangt worden. Die Fertigstellung und die Anwendung der Verordnungen führte nacheinander – schon in den Sechzigerjahren
    [Show full text]
  • AGENDA WEDNESDAY, 3 OCTOBER 2018 THURSDAY, 4 OCTOBER 2018 (CONT.) 15:55 Depart from Eleftherios Venizelos • Mr
    REGION OF WESTERN MACEDONIA 3 – 6 October 2018 Business Visit to the Region of Western Macedonia Foreign Economic and Commercial Missions and other Foreign Interests AGENDA WEDNESDAY, 3 OCTOBER 2018 THURSDAY, 4 OCTOBER 2018 (CONT.) 15:55 Depart from Eleftherios Venizelos • Mr. Eleftherios Ioannidis, Mayor of the Munici- Airport pality of Kozani 16:50 Arrival at the Makedonia Aiport (SKG) in • Μr. George Konstantopoulos, President of Thessaloniki Greek Exporters Association (SEVE) 17:15 Departure by private Bus to Kozani 10:00 – Speeches 11:45 19:30 Arrival and Check in at ELENA Hotel and • Ms. Dimitra Pragalou, Investment Promotion Aliakmon Hotel Directorate, Enterprise Greece, «The Investment Profile of the Region of Western Macedonia» 20:00 Departure by private Bus to a local restaurant (tbc) • Mr. Spyros Ignatiadis, General Director at Greek Exporters Association (SEVE), «The 20:30 – Welcoming speech by Mr. Theodoros Exports Outlook of Western Macedonia 22:00 Karypidis, Governor of the Region of Western Macedonia Region» Signing of a Memorandum of • Dr. Christos Georgiou, Director of Documenta- Collaboration between Enterprise tion, Research and Studies Directorate at Feder- Greece and the Region of Western ation of Industries of Northern Greece (SBBE), Macedonia «The Manufacturing Sector in Western Macedo- nia: Prospects for Enterpreneurial Cooperation» Dinner (hosted by Mr. Theodoros 11:45 – Coffee Break Karypidis, Governor of the Region of 12:00 Western Macedonia) (Main Conference Room Foyer, Ground floor) 12:00 – B2B meetings 14:00 (Main Conference Room Foyer, Ground floor) THURSDAY, 4 OCTOBER 2018 12:00 – Training business seminar for SMEs – Mr. 08:30 – Registration 14:00 George Papastergiopoulos, Director of Busi- 09:00 (Western Macedonia Exhibition Center, Main ness Information & Support, Enterprise Greece, Conference Room Foyer, Ground floor) “Taking the rights steps for successful export” 09:00 – Welcome Remarks (Room 4, 1st floor) 10:00 Coordinator: Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Struggle of Hellenism Over Macedonia
    THE STRUGGLE OF HELLENISM OVER MACEDONIA A SURVEY OF RECENT BIBLIOGRAPHY The rise of nationalities, European power politics and the impending dissolution of the Ottoman empire had converted the Balkans at the end of last and the beginning of this century into a field of fierce national antagonism. Events, especially in that vast area of the peninsula, geogra­ phically from very remote times known by the name of Macedonia, had gone far beyond the Turkish state’s boundaries and had become matters of international concern. "The Macedonian Question” drew at one time the attention of public opinion all over Europe and, up to this moment, presents a most interesting subject to the scholar of Balkan history. From the Greek side, the Macedonian Question has been nothing but the compulsory struggle of Hellenism to keep its position against Bulgarian infiltration strongly agitated by foreign power politics; the outcome of the struggle is primarily due to the overwhelmingly in all respects superiority of the Greek element in the disputed area, its vitality and will for resistance. The assistance given by the Kingdom of Greece at the last stage of the fight (1904- 1908) would have otherwise been fruitless. An effort to study this subject from a more general scope has re­ cently been undertaken under the auspices of the Institute f or Balkan Studies of the Society for Macedonian Studies in Thessalonike. The effort includes the collection of all published or unpublished material, of manuscripts, handwritten notes, letters, photographs, newspapers of that time, official consular reports, Turkish documents etc. and their examination by a special staff.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Russian Policy in the Balkans, 1878-1914
    1 Russian Policy in the Balkans, 1878-1914 At the end of the 19th and the beginning of the 20th century, the Balkans were the most turbulent region in Europe. On the one hand were the Balkan peoples with their aims of creating their own national states with the broadest borders possible, and on the other, the ambitions of the Great Powers to gain spheres of influence in the European territories of the Ottoman Empire. This led to a continually strained and unstable situation. 1.1 Between the Two Wars: 1856-1877 The Crimean War proved to be the turning point in the relations between Russia and the Near East. After this first serious defeat of the Russian army in a war with the Ottoman Empire, Christians of the Near East and the Balkans looked more and more towards Europe. The image of Russia as the liberator of the Orthodox inhabitants of the Ottoman Empire faded and the authority of the Russian tsar was to a great extent lost. Russian diplomacy after 1856 focused totally on the restoration of Russia’s former authority. Of great significance in this process were the activities of Count N. P. Ignatiev, the ambassa- dor to Constantinople from 1864 to 1877.11 His idea of creating ‘Greater Bulgaria’, a large south-Slavonic state in the Balkans, as a base for Russian interests and further penetra- tion towards the Straits, received the support of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and coincided with the intentions of Tsar Alexander II. In 1870, the Russian government declared that it would no longer comply with the restrictions of the Paris Treaty of 1856.
    [Show full text]
  • 01 July 2014
    TO BHMAÔÇÓ ÅÊÊËÇÓÉÁÓ THE FIRST HELLENIC NEWSPAPER IN AUSTRALIA (ESTABLISHED 1913) - www.greekorthodox.org.au JULY 2014 - ÉÏÕËÉÏÓ 2014 Tel. (02) 9559 7022 Fax: (02) 9559 7033 E-mail: [email protected] Áñ. Ö. 8344 - PRICE $1.70 (GST incl.) I IN IITHISN THI ISISSUEIISSUE OFOF THETHE GGREEKREEK A AUSTRALIANUSTRALIIAN V EVEMAMA N S OUR PRIMATE’S VIEW E R CONSUMERS AND PARTICIPANTS T PAGE 5/23 ÄÉÐËÙÌÁÔÉÊÇ ÊÉÍÇÔÉÊÏÔÇÔÁ ÃÉÁ ÊÁÔÁÐÁÕÓÇ ÔÏÕ ÐÕÑÏÓ Ïé ó÷Ýóåéò öéëßáò Áõóôñáëßáò - ÅëëÜäáò Óå Üñèñï ôçò ëßãåò ìÝñåò ðñéí ïëïêëçñþóåé ôç èçôåßá ôçò óôçí ÅëëÜäá, ç ÐñÝóâçò ôçò Áõóôñá- ëßáò óôçí ÁèÞíá, ÔæÝíç (ÐïëõîÝ- íç) Ìðëïýìöéëíô áíáöÝñåôáé óôéò ó÷Ýóåéò öéëßáò áíÜìåóá óôçí Áõóôñáëßá êáé ôçí ÅëëÜäá. ÓÅËÉÄÁ 9 ÁÉÌÁÔÏÊÕËÉÓÌÁ ¸íáò ÌÜíïò áíÜìåóá óôïõò íÜíïõò Åßêïóé ÷ñüíéá ìåôÜ ôïí èÜíáôï ôïõ ìåãÜëïõ ×áôæéäÜêé, üëá üóá åß÷å ðåé äåí áêïýãïíôáé ìüíï åðßêáéñá, áëëÜ êáé Üêñùò åðáíáóôáôéêÜ. ÓÅËÉÄÁ 45 ÓÔÇ ÃÁÆÁ ÁíÜìåóá óôá èýìáôá êáé ðáéäéÜ Oé áåñïðïñéêÝò åðéäñïìÝò ðïõ åîáðïëýåé ôï ÉóñáÞë óôç Ëù- öýãïõí ôéò áíèñþðéíåò áðþëåéåò êáé íá åðáíÝëèïõí óôçí çñå- ñßäá ôçò ÃÜæáò Ý÷ïõí óôïé÷ßóåé ôçí æùÞ óå 177 áíèñþðïõò êáé ìßá. Åßìáóôå óå åðáöÞ ìå ôéò ðëåõñÝò óôçí ðåñéï÷Þ ìå óôü÷ï Ý÷ïõí ðñïêáëÝóåé ôïí ôñáõìáôéóìü 1.280 áíèñþðùí óå äéÜóôç- ôçí åðßôåõîç Üìåóçò åêå÷åéñßáò», äÞëùóå ç ÌÜãéá Êïôóßãéáí- ìá 7 çìåñþí, óýìöùíá ìå ôéò õðçñåóßåò ðñþôùí âïçèåéþí, åíþ ôóéôò, åêðñüóùðïò ôçò åðéêåöáëÞò ôçò åõñùðáúêÞò äéðëùìáôß- Ýíáò åêðñüóùðïò ôïõ ÏÇÅ äÞëùóå üôé ôï Ýíá ôÝôáñôï ôùí èõ- áò. ìÜôùí Þôáí ðáéäéÜ. Ôçí ßäéá þñá üìùò, óôç ÃÜæá, íÝåò åðéäñïìÝò Ýðëçîáí âÜóåéò Ôï Ðáëáéóôéíéáêü ÊÝíôñï ãéá ôá Áíèñþðéíá Äéêáéþìáôá, ðïõ ôùí Ôáîéáñ÷éþí Åæåíôßí áë-ÊÜóáì, ôçò óôñáôéùôéêÞò ðôÝñõãáò åäñåýåé óôç ÃÜæá, áíáêïßíùóå üôé ôá ôñßá ôÝôáñôá êáé ðëÝïí ôùí ôçò ×áìÜò, ÷ùñßò íá õðÜñîïõí èýìáôá èõìÜôùí Þôáí Üìá÷ïé.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Cleavages and National “Awakening” in Ottoman Macedonia 1 by Basil C
    East European Quarterly 29 (1995), 409-426 Social cleavages and national “awakening” in Ottoman Macedonia 1 by Basil C. Gounaris In early summer 1992 a lavish monograph was published in Skopje entitled Macedonia on old Maps.2 In the first chapter of the book, which is called “A History without a Geography”, Ilija Petrushevski states that: “These maps present the undeniable historical and scientific facts about the distinctness of the Ìacedonian nation, which differs from its neighbours not only by its territory, which has always belonged to it, but also by its language, folklore, traditions and all the other elements of significance in ethnic differentiation”.3 Petrushevski’s attempt to support the existence of a nation by stressing its connection with an age-old ethnic core is not a new task in Balkan historiography, nor is it the first time that the testimony of old maps is being employed to serve such a cause.4 It has been stated that the advent of the European Enlightenment in the Ottoman Balkans involved a rather slow procedure. Describing, however, pre-independence nationalist feelings of the Balkan peoples, especially the situation in the hinterland of the peninsula (Macedonia included), is a demanding exercise, which far exceeds the purpose of this paper.5 In brief, modern Greek nationalism emerged in the 18th century and was affected by western ideas, but its actual roots lay in protonationalist phenomena noticed in the 13th century Byzantium.6 Under Ottoman rule these feelings were only partly preserved through the institutions of the millet system. The folk of the Ecumenical Patriarchate was the Rum-i-millet, with a population which, in addition to the Greek-speakers, included large numbers of Slav- Vlach and other non Greek- speaking Orthodox subjects of the Sultan.
    [Show full text]
  • MACEDONIA What Went Wrong in the Last 200 Years?
    MACEDONIA What went wrong in the last 200 years? A collection of articles By Risto Stefov MACEDONIA What went wrong in the last 200 years? A collection of articles Published by: Risto Stefov Publications [email protected] Toronto, Canada All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without written consent from the author, except for the inclusion of brief and documented quotations in a review. Copyright 2003 by Risto Stefov e-book edition ********** February 2003 ********** 2 Index Part I - 1800 - 1878 ........................................................................4 Part II - 1878 - 1903.....................................................................27 Part III - Before 1903 ...................................................................48 Part IV - The 1903 Ilinden Aftermath..........................................71 Part V - 1908 - 1913.....................................................................96 Part VI - 1912- 1939 ..................................................................115 Part VII - 1939- 1949 - WWII & the Greek Civil War..............135 Part VIII - The Plight of the Macedonian Refugee Children.....161 Part IX - Conclusion ..................................................................181 3 Part I - 1800 - 1878 Even before Alexander’s time Macedonia was a single nation. With time she grew and shrunk but always remained a single nation until her partition in 1912-13. Today however, while new nations spring up and flourish, Macedonia is still partitioned and fighting for her identity. Why? What went wrong and who is responsible? If the Balkan roots lie in antiquity then the first stem that created the modern Balkan countries sprang up in the 19th century. The 19th century is the most important period in modern Balkan history and will be the subject of this and subsequent articles.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fight for Balkan Latinity (II). the Aromanians After World War
    ISSN 2039-9340 Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 3 (11) November 2012 The Fight for Balkan Latinity (II). The Aromanians after World War Giuseppe Motta (Ph.D) Sapienza University of Rome Doi:10.5901/mjss.2012.v3n11p541 Abstract The article focuses on the Vlach question after the first World War, when the Balkan region was finally divided among the different national States and the Ottoman Empire collapsed. In this period the Aromanian communities had to find a new policy inside a new scenario and addressed towards different options represented by Albania, Italy and Romania. In a first time Vlachs also tried to create an autonomous principality of Pindus but this experience was short-lived and did not produce tangible results. On the contrary, during the interwar period the Vlachs consolidated their privileged relationship with Romania and established an influent group at Bucharest, where they partecipated to the internal political life even supporting the most radical movements such as Corneliu's Codreanu Iron Guard. Keywords: Aromanian, Vlach, Balkan, Albania, Romania. 1. Introduction. The Vlachs and the First World War. The history of the Vlachs in the Balkan regions was undoubtedly conditioned by the unstable and chaotic situation of the region, which during the troublesome period of the “Eastern Question” became a central area for the system of international relationships. The problems were particularly acute in the regions of Pindus, Epirus and Macedonia, and were naturally exacerbated by the constant atmosphere of war that the people of this area breathed for many years, at the end of XIX century and during the first decades of the XX.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnic Cleansing and Massacres of the Ottoman
    The Nation-Building Process in the Balkans: Ethnic Cleansing and Massacres of the Ottoman Muslim and Turkish Population (1912-1913) Le processus de construction de la nation dans les Balkans: nettoyage ethnique et massacre des musulmans ottomans et turcs (1912-1913) Conference organized by the Collège Belgique (Académie Royale de Belgique) and the University of Utah Mars-March 24-25, 2016 Bruxelles-Brussels (Belgique-Belgium) A. Argumentaire en français : Le processus de construction de la nation dans les Balkans : nettoyage ethnique et massacre des musulmans ottomans et turcs (1912-1913) Dans le contexte de la désintégration de l’Empire Ottoman et de l’émergence du nouveau système étatique balkanique, la guerre a joué un rôle dans les processus de construction des nations et des états. Le système étatique balkanique a été créé pour résoudre la question d’Orient, et les états concernés ont fini par devenir des états-nations homogènes suite à une série de guerres qui atteignirent leur apogée lors de ce que l’on a appelé les guerres balkaniques (1912-1913). Ce fut la première guerre totale dans les Balkans, si l’on considère que les frontières entre le front de bataille et le front intérieur ont été supprimées au moyen d’une attaque systématique de certains groupes identitaires. On peut d’ailleurs considérer que, pour l’état ottoman, la première guerre mondiale a commencé en 1912 car le ton était donné et le schéma établi pour la première guerre mondiale. Qui plus est, les pères fondateurs de l’actuelle république de Turquie sont tous originaires des Balkans.
    [Show full text]