Theory and Interpretation of Narrative James Phelan, Peter J

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Theory and Interpretation of Narrative James Phelan, Peter J THEORY AND INTERPRETATION OF NARRATIVE James Phelan, Peter J. Rabinowitz, and Robyn Warhol, Series Editors All Rights Reserved. Copyright © The Ohio State University Press, 2015. Batch 1. All Rights Reserved. Copyright © The Ohio State University Press, 2015. Batch 1. UNNATURAL NARRATIVE Theory, History, and Practice BRIAN RICHARDSON THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY PRESS • COLUMBus All Rights Reserved. Copyright © The Ohio State University Press, 2015. Batch 1. Copyright © 2015 by The Ohio State University. All rights reserved. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Richardson, Brian, 1953– Unnatural narrative : theory, history, and practice / Brian Richardson. pages cm. — (Theory and interpretation of narrative) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-8142-1279-0 (hardback) — ISBN 978-0-8142-9384-3 (cd-rom) 1. Narration (Rhetoric) I. Title. PN212.R49 2015 808'.036—dc23 2014044399 Cover design by Thao Thai Text design by Juliet Williams Type set in Adobe Garamond Pro Printed by Thomson-Shore, Inc. The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the American Nation- al Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials. ANSI Z39.48–1992. 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 All Rights Reserved. Copyright © The Ohio State University Press, 2015. Batch 1. To my brother, Alan All Rights Reserved. Copyright © The Ohio State University Press, 2015. Batch 1. All Rights Reserved. Copyright © The Ohio State University Press, 2015. Batch 1. CONTENTS Acknowledgments ix Preface xiii PART I: THEORY 1 A Theory of Unnatural Narratives: Definitions, Paradigms, Problems 3 2 The Limitations of Conventional Narrative Theory 28 PART II: APPLICATION 3 A Poetics of Unnatural Stories: Fabula, Syuzhet, and Sequence 51 4 Contesting the Boundary of Fictionality in Contemporary Narrative 67 PART III: HISTORY 5 Toward a History of Unnatural Narratives 91 6 Unnatural Narratives in the Twentieth Century 121 PART IV: IDEOLOGY 7 Oppositional Literature and Unnatural Poetics 143 CONCLUSION Methodology and the Unnatural: Antimimesis and Narrative Theory 163 Works Cited 173 Index 189 All Rights Reserved. Copyright © The Ohio State University Press, 2015. Batch 1. All Rights Reserved. Copyright © The Ohio State University Press, 2015. Batch 1. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS HAVE BENEFITTED from many rich, thoughtful, and occasionally heated discussions on the subject of unnatu- I ral narratives with a number of theorists: Porter Abbott, Liesbeth Korthals Altes, Marco Caracciolo, Hilary Dannen- berg, Amy Elias, Monika Fludernik, David Herman, Uri Mar- golin, Gunther Martens, Ansgar Nünning, Alan Palmer, Sylvie Patron, Ellen Peel, Gerald Prince, Alan Richardson, Catherine Romagnolo, Marie-Laure Ryan, Eyal Segal, Roy Sommer, Meir Sternberg, Nancy Stewart, and Werner Wolf; I thank them all very much for helping me clarify, refine, extend, and rework my ideas and the terms to express them. I also thank those who have discussed my work with me at the annual International Narrative and European Narratology Network conferences. I am especially grateful to Monika Fludernik and the FRIAS institute at the University of Freiburg; to Luc Herman, Bart Vervaeck, Lars Bernaerts, and the Center for the Study of Post- modernism in Ghent; Henrik Skov Nielsen, Stefan Iversen and the members of the Narrative Research Lab, and Per Stounbjerg of the Center for Fictionality Studies at Aarhus University; Brian McHale, James Phelan, and Robyn Warhol of Project Narrative at The Ohio State University; Maria Mäkelä, Pekka Tammi, and their colleagues at the University of Tampere; John ix All Rights Reserved. Copyright © The Ohio State University Press, 2015. Batch 1. x • Acknowledgments Pier, Philippe Roussin, and the members of “Narratologies contempo- raines” seminar of Centre de recherches sur les arts et le langage (CRAL); and Richard Walsh and the Interdisciplinary Centre for Narrative Studies in York, UK. Being able to present and discuss my work in these venues with these theorists has been invaluable. I am grateful to Nancy Stewart for editorial advice. I thank my depart- ment chairs, Kent Cartwright and William Cohen, for their generous intellectual and material support of my work. I greatly appreciate a fel- lowship from the Institute of Aesthetics and Communication at Aarhus University and a RASA grant provided by the University of Maryland’s College of Arts and Humanities that enabled me to complete this volume. I offer a special homage to editors Sandy Crooms and Malcolm Litchfield and to the magnificent staff at The Ohio State University Press, in particu- lar managing editor Tara Cyphers; every aspect of working with them has been a great pleasure. I am grateful for many helpful suggestions from the anonymous reader for the Ohio State University Press and to series editors James Phelan and Peter Rabinowitz for their characteristically superb comments, sug- gestions, and editing. I especially wish to thank two colleagues who have been central to the development of unnatural narrative theory: Jan Alber, the principal organizer of the first conference on unnatural narratology, who read and discussed earlier versions of several chapters of this work. I am greatly indebted to his astute comments, theoretical acuity, personal generosity, and wonderful collegiality. I also thank Henrik Skov Nielsen for careful readings of two chapters and many helpful discussions of my work, often in Aarhus. I express my gratitude to both, brilliant scholars and wonderful collaborators, whose superb work, intellectual insight, and personal friendships have been extraordinarily helpful. Finally, I thank the following presses for allowing me to reprint mate- rial, earlier versions of which appeared in their pages: de Gruyter for pages from “Unnatural Voices in Ulysses: Joyce’s Postmodern Modes of Narra- tion” in Strange Voices in Narrative Fiction, edited by Per Krogh Hansen, Stefan Iversen, Henrik Skov Nielsen, and Rolf Reitan that are included in chapter 6 and for “What Is Unnatural Narrative Theory?” from Unnatu- ral Narratives, Unnatural Narratology, edited by Jan Alber and Rüdiger Heinze; some of this material now appears in chapters 1, 2, and the con- clusion. I thank the University of Nebraska Press for the right to reprint several paragraphs from Storyworlds in chapter 4, Modern Philology for the section on Macbeth in chapter 5, the University of Texas Press for material All Rights Reserved. Copyright © The Ohio State University Press, 2015. Batch 1. Acknowledgments • xi in chapter 7 from the essay “U.S. Ethnic and Postcolonial Fiction: Toward a Collectivist Poetics,” in Analyzing World Fiction: New Horizons in Nar- rative Theory, edited by Frederick Aldama, and Peter Lang SA for pages in the conclusion from my article, “Narrative Theory, Methodology, and the Unusual Text” that appeared in Théorie, analyse, interpretation des récits, edited by Sylvie Patron, Berlin, 2011, pages 57–71. All Rights Reserved. Copyright © The Ohio State University Press, 2015. Batch 1. All Rights Reserved. Copyright © The Ohio State University Press, 2015. Batch 1. PREFACE NNATURAL N A R R AT I V E has several goals: to provide a full elucidation of the theory of unnatural narratives, U to trace the history of unnatural narratives from antiq- uity to the present, to provide some analyses of unnatural texts, and to address a number of pressing theoretical questions, such as the question of fictionality that authors of unnatural works repeatedly foreground. In doing so, I hope to provide a substan- tial adjustment to narrative theory as it is currently practiced by adding a significantly new perspective to the basic model that is currently used. Since the 1960s, narrative innovation has proceeded at an astounding pace, and narrative theory has been slow to fully conceptualize these innovations and integrate them into existing theoretical models. Unnatural narrative theory has focused on these texts, expanding theoretical models to incorpo- rate these practices, and looking back into the history of narra- tive to find significant antecedents of these strategies. As it turns out, they are everywhere. This book has four parts and seven chapters. I begin with two theoretical chapters, and move on to two applications of the theory. The first chapter provides several basic definitions—of unnatural narrative as well as other central concepts in the book such as mimetic and antimimetic narratives. It discusses degrees xiii All Rights Reserved. Copyright © The Ohio State University Press, 2015. Batch 1. xiv • Preface of unnaturalness in various texts and notes the range of unnatural narra- tives in Western literary history, classical Asian drama, folktales, and popu- lar culture. I differentiate the unnatural from superficially similar forms, including science fiction, supernatural works, fantastic tales, allegory, and highly stylized texts. I go on to discuss some compelling borderline cases and deal with the question of the possible relative or changing status of the unnatural over time or across cultures. In addition, this chapter argues against rival conceptions of the unnatural, in particular the important work of Jan Alber. At the end, I offer a short account of some pertinent anticipa- tions of unnatural narrative theory in the history of critical theory. The econds chapter examines several widespread concepts of narrative theory and points out how they are transgressed by unnatural fictions. The areas I investigate are story, sequence, narration, character, space, episte-
Recommended publications
  • The Significance of Anime As a Novel Animation Form, Referencing Selected Works by Hayao Miyazaki, Satoshi Kon and Mamoru Oshii
    The significance of anime as a novel animation form, referencing selected works by Hayao Miyazaki, Satoshi Kon and Mamoru Oshii Ywain Tomos submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Aberystwyth University Department of Theatre, Film and Television Studies, September 2013 DECLARATION This work has not previously been accepted in substance for any degree and is not being concurrently submitted in candidature for any degree. Signed………………………………………………………(candidate) Date …………………………………………………. STATEMENT 1 This dissertation is the result of my own independent work/investigation, except where otherwise stated. Other sources are acknowledged explicit references. A bibliography is appended. Signed………………………………………………………(candidate) Date …………………………………………………. STATEMENT 2 I hereby give consent for my dissertation, if accepted, to be available for photocopying and for inter-library loan, and for the title and summary to be made available to outside organisations. Signed………………………………………………………(candidate) Date …………………………………………………. 2 Acknowledgements I would to take this opportunity to sincerely thank my supervisors, Elin Haf Gruffydd Jones and Dr Dafydd Sills-Jones for all their help and support during this research study. Thanks are also due to my colleagues in the Department of Theatre, Film and Television Studies, Aberystwyth University for their friendship during my time at Aberystwyth. I would also like to thank Prof Josephine Berndt and Dr Sheuo Gan, Kyoto Seiko University, Kyoto for their valuable insights during my visit in 2011. In addition, I would like to express my thanks to the Coleg Cenedlaethol for the scholarship and the opportunity to develop research skills in the Welsh language. Finally I would like to thank my wife Tomoko for her support, patience and tolerance over the last four years – diolch o’r galon Tomoko, ありがとう 智子.
    [Show full text]
  • Mimesis: Foot Washing from Luke to John
    Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses 92/4 (2016) 655-670. doi: 10.2143/ETL.92.4.3183465 © 2016 by Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses. All rights reserved. Mimesis: Foot Washing from Luke to John Keith L. YODER University of Massachusetts at Amherst Introduction In this paper I argue that the Foot Washing of John 13,1-17, as literary composition, is a mimesis of the Sinful Woman narrative of Luke 7,36-501. Maurits Sabbe first proposed this mimetic association in 19822, followed by Thomas Brodie in 19933 and Ingrid Rosa Kitzberger in 19944, but the pro- posal dropped from view without ever being fully explored. Now a fresh comparison of the two texts uncovers a large array of previously unsurveyed parallels. Evaluation of old and new evidence will demonstrate that this is an instance of creative imitation, that combination of literary μίμησις (imi- tatio) and ζήλωσις (aemulatio) widely practiced by writers in antiquity5. Key directional indicators will point to Luke as the original and John as the emulation. I will here examine fifteen features in Luke that are paralleled in John. Throughout, I reference the internal tests for intertextual mimesis developed by Dennis R. MacDonald: the density, order, distinctiveness, and interpret- ability of the parallels6. Since external evidence pertinent to the relative dating of the Gospels of Luke and John is scarce and subject to debate, I will not address his tests of accessibility and analogy, but will focus instead on pointers of directionality arising from the internal evidence. 1. This paper was first presented at the March 2016 Annual Meeting of the Eastern Great Lakes Region of the Society of Biblical Literature, in Perrysville, Ohio, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Thoughts on Diegetic Music in the Early Operas of Zandonai1
    DAVID ROSEN THOUGHTS ON DIEGETIC MUSIC IN THE EARLY OPERAS OF ZANDONAI1 Diegetic music – «music that (apparently) issues from a source within the narrative» (Gorbman, 23)2 – plays an important role in Zandonai’s early operas: not only does it appear frequently, but it often pushes the action forward, eliciting responses from the characters who hear it. And some of its uses are unusual, if not unprecedented. In this essay I focus on Il grillo del focolare but make cross-references to diegetic music in L’uccellino d’oro, Conchita, and Melenis as well. Readers unfamiliar with these operas may want to consult plot summaries, for example, in Dryden (469-79). Table 1 lists the passages referred to in this essay. 1 I want to express my thanks to the Centro internazionale di studi «Riccardo Zan- donai», especially to Diego Cescotti, Irene Comisso, and Federica Fortunato for assistance of all sorts before, during, and after the conference. Thanks go also to Gary Moulsdale for his comments on an earlier version of this text, to Ann Beck- man and other friends on WM-L (my favorite online opera discussion group) for answering some questions about precedents for certain uses of diegetic music, and to Carol Rosen for having translated into Italian the version of this essay that I delivered at the conference. 2 Citations refer to the Selective Bibliography at the end of this essay. The category ‘diegetic music’ thus includes both ‘musica in scena’ and ‘musica di scena’ (for the distinction see, for example, Girardi, 101-102). That is, it may include music emanating from offstage (whether in the wings or from the orchestra pit) or on- stage in full view of the audience.
    [Show full text]
  • Double-Edged Imitation
    Double-Edged Imitation Theories and Practices of Pastiche in Literature Sanna Nyqvist University of Helsinki 2010 © Sanna Nyqvist 2010 ISBN 978-952-92-6970-9 Nord Print Oy Helsinki 2010 Acknowledgements Among the great pleasures of bringing a project like this to com- pletion is the opportunity to declare my gratitude to the many people who have made it possible and, moreover, enjoyable and instructive. My supervisor, Professor H.K. Riikonen has accorded me generous academic freedom, as well as unfailing support when- ever I have needed it. His belief in the merits of this book has been a source of inspiration and motivation. Professor Steven Connor and Professor Suzanne Keen were as thorough and care- ful pre-examiners as I could wish for and I am very grateful for their suggestions and advice. I have been privileged to conduct my work for four years in the Finnish Graduate School of Literary Studies under the direc- torship of Professor Bo Pettersson. He and the Graduate School’s Post-Doctoral Researcher Harri Veivo not only offered insightful and careful comments on my papers, but equally importantly cre- ated a friendly and encouraging atmosphere in the Graduate School seminars. I thank my fellow post-graduate students – Dr. Juuso Aarnio, Dr. Ulrika Gustafsson, Dr. Mari Hatavara, Dr. Saija Isomaa, Mikko Kallionsivu, Toni Lahtinen, Hanna Meretoja, Dr. Outi Oja, Dr. Merja Polvinen, Dr. Riikka Rossi, Dr. Hanna Ruutu, Juho-Antti Tuhkanen and Jussi Willman – for their feed- back and collegial support. The rush to meet the seminar deadline was always amply compensated by the discussions in the seminar itself, and afterwards over a glass of wine.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Hypernarrative in Fiction Film: Alternative Narrative in American Film (1989−2012)
    Copyright by Taehyun Cho 2014 The Thesis Committee for Taehyun Cho Certifies that this is the approved version of the following thesis: A Study of Hypernarrative in Fiction Film: Alternative Narrative in American Film (1989−2012) APPROVED BY SUPERVISING COMMITTEE: Supervisor: Charles R. Berg Thomas G. Schatz A Study of Hypernarrative in Fiction Film: Alternative Narrative in American Film (1989−2012) by Taehyun Cho, B.A. Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts The University of Texas at Austin May 2014 Dedication To my family who teaches me love. Acknowledgements I would like to give special thanks to my advisor, Professor Berg, for his intellectual guidance and warm support throughout my graduate years. I am also grateful to my thesis committee, Professor Schatz, for providing professional insights as a scholar to advance my work. v Abstract A Study of Hypernarrative in Fiction Film: Alternative Narrative in American Film (1989-2012) Taehyun Cho, M.A. The University of Texas at Austin, 2014 Supervisor: Charles R. Berg Although many scholars attempted to define and categorize alternative narratives, a new trend in narrative that has proliferated at the turn of the 21st century, there is no consensus. To understand recent alternative narrative films more comprehensively, another approach using a new perspective may be required. This study used hypertextuality as a new criterion to examine the strategies of alternative narratives, as well as the hypernarrative structure and characteristics in alternative narratives. Using the six types of linkage patterns (linear, hierarchy, hypercube, directed acyclic graph, clumped, and arbitrary links), this study analyzed six recent American fiction films (between 1989 and 2012) that best represent each linkage pattern.
    [Show full text]
  • Downbeat.Com February 2021 U.K. £6.99
    FEBRUARY 2021 U.K. £6.99 DOWNBEAT.COM FEBRUARY 2021 DOWNBEAT 1 FEBRUARY 2021 VOLUME 88 / NUMBER 2 President Kevin Maher Publisher Frank Alkyer Editor Bobby Reed Reviews Editor Dave Cantor Contributing Editor Ed Enright Creative Director ŽanetaÎuntová Design Assistant Will Dutton Assistant to the Publisher Sue Mahal Bookkeeper Evelyn Oakes ADVERTISING SALES Record Companies & Schools Jennifer Ruban-Gentile Vice President of Sales 630-359-9345 [email protected] Musical Instruments & East Coast Schools Ritche Deraney Vice President of Sales 201-445-6260 [email protected] Advertising Sales Associate Grace Blackford 630-359-9358 [email protected] OFFICES 102 N. Haven Road, Elmhurst, IL 60126–2970 630-941-2030 / Fax: 630-941-3210 http://downbeat.com [email protected] CUSTOMER SERVICE 877-904-5299 / [email protected] CONTRIBUTORS Senior Contributors: Michael Bourne, Aaron Cohen, Howard Mandel, John McDonough Atlanta: Jon Ross; Boston: Fred Bouchard, Frank-John Hadley; Chicago: Alain Drouot, Michael Jackson, Jeff Johnson, Peter Margasak, Bill Meyer, Paul Natkin, Howard Reich; Indiana: Mark Sheldon; Los Angeles: Earl Gibson, Sean J. O’Connell, Chris Walker, Josef Woodard, Scott Yanow; Michigan: John Ephland; Minneapolis: Andrea Canter; Nashville: Bob Doerschuk; New Orleans: Erika Goldring, Jennifer Odell; New York: Herb Boyd, Bill Douthart, Philip Freeman, Stephanie Jones, Matthew Kassel, Jimmy Katz, Suzanne Lorge, Phillip Lutz, Jim Macnie, Ken Micallef, Bill Milkowski, Allen Morrison, Dan Ouellette, Ted Panken, Tom Staudter, Jack Vartoogian; Philadelphia: Shaun Brady; Portland: Robert Ham; San Francisco: Yoshi Kato, Denise Sullivan; Seattle: Paul de Barros; Washington, D.C.: Willard Jenkins, John Murph, Michael Wilderman; Canada: J.D. Considine, James Hale; France: Jean Szlamowicz; Germany: Hyou Vielz; Great Britain: Andrew Jones; Portugal: José Duarte; Romania: Virgil Mihaiu; Russia: Cyril Moshkow.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Music Past and Present
    Understanding Music Past and Present N. Alan Clark, PhD Thomas Heflin, DMA Jeffrey Kluball, EdD Elizabeth Kramer, PhD Understanding Music Past and Present N. Alan Clark, PhD Thomas Heflin, DMA Jeffrey Kluball, EdD Elizabeth Kramer, PhD Dahlonega, GA Understanding Music: Past and Present is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribu- tion-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license allows you to remix, tweak, and build upon this work, even commercially, as long as you credit this original source for the creation and license the new creation under identical terms. If you reuse this content elsewhere, in order to comply with the attribution requirements of the license please attribute the original source to the University System of Georgia. NOTE: The above copyright license which University System of Georgia uses for their original content does not extend to or include content which was accessed and incorpo- rated, and which is licensed under various other CC Licenses, such as ND licenses. Nor does it extend to or include any Special Permissions which were granted to us by the rightsholders for our use of their content. Image Disclaimer: All images and figures in this book are believed to be (after a rea- sonable investigation) either public domain or carry a compatible Creative Commons license. If you are the copyright owner of images in this book and you have not authorized the use of your work under these terms, please contact the University of North Georgia Press at [email protected] to have the content removed. ISBN: 978-1-940771-33-5 Produced by: University System of Georgia Published by: University of North Georgia Press Dahlonega, Georgia Cover Design and Layout Design: Corey Parson For more information, please visit http://ung.edu/university-press Or email [email protected] TABLE OF C ONTENTS MUSIC FUNDAMENTALS 1 N.
    [Show full text]
  • Narrative Theory
    NARRATIVE THEORY EDITED BY JAMES PHELAN AND PETER J. RABINOWITZ A Companion to Narrative Theory Blackwell Companions to Literature and Culture This series offers comprehensive, newly written surveys of key periods and movements and certain major authors, in English literary culture and history. Extensive volumes provide new perspectives and positions on contexts and on canonical and postcanoni- cal texts, orientating the beginning student in new fields of study and providing the experienced undergraduate and new graduate with current and new directions, as pioneered and developed by leading scholars in the field. 1 A Companion to Romanticism Edited by Duncan Wu 2 A Companion to Victorian Literature and Culture Edited by Herbert F. Tucker 3 A Companion to Shakespeare Edited by David Scott Kastan 4 A Companion to the Gothic Edited by David Punter 5 A Feminist Companion to Shakespeare Edited by Dympna Callaghan 6 A Companion to Chaucer Edited by Peter Brown 7 A Companion to Literature from Milton to Blake Edited by David Womersley 8 A Companion to English Renaissance Literature and Culture Edited by Michael Hattaway 9 A Companion to Milton Edited by Thomas N. Corns 10 A Companion to Twentieth-Century Poetry Edited by Neil Roberts 11 A Companion to Anglo-Saxon Literature and Culture Edited by Phillip Pulsiano and Elaine Treharne 12 A Companion to Restoration Drama Edited by Susan J. Owen 13 A Companion to Early Modern Women’s Writing Edited by Anita Pacheco 14 A Companion to Renaissance Drama Edited by Arthur F. Kinney 15 A Companion to Victorian Poetry Edited by Richard Cronin, Alison Chapman, and Antony H.
    [Show full text]
  • New Exception for Parody
    Response to first batch Draft Legislation to modernise copyright exceptions published for technical review (See http://www.ipo.gov.uk/types/hargreaves/hargreaves-copyright/hargreaves- copyright-techreview.htm) Background This is a collaborative submission from a group of academics based in the UK with expertise in intellectual property and information technology law and related areas. The preparation of this response has been funded by (1) British and Irish Law, Education and Technology Association (“BILETA”) http://www.bileta.ac.uk/default.aspx and (2) CREATe (Creativity, Regulation Enterprise and Technology) the RCUK Centre for Copyright and New Business Models in the Creative Economy http://www.create.ac.uk/ This response has been prepared by Fiona Grant and Kim Barker. Fiona Grant is Lecturer in Law at the University of Abertay. She specialises in intellectual property and information technology. Kim Barker is Teaching Fellow at the University of Birmingham. She specialises in intellectual property and information technology. This response has been approved by the Executive of BILETA (the British and Irish Law, Education and Technology Association http://www.bileta.ac.uk/default.aspx) and is therefore submitted on behalf of BILETA. This response has been approved by the Management Committee of CREATe (http://www.create.ac.uk) and is therefore submitted on behalf of CREATe. In addition, this response is submitted by the following individuals: Dr Abbe Brown, University of Aberdeen Mr Felipe Romero Moreno, Oxford Brookes University Dr Phoebe Li, University of Sussex New exception for parody 1. Adopting this exception will give people in the UK’s creative industries greater freedom to use others’ works for parody purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Instrumental Rationality: a Reprise by Joseph Raz1 HE OPPORTUNITY
    JOURNAL OF ETHICS & SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY | SYMPOSIUM INSTRUMENTAL RATIONALITY: A REPRISE Joseph Raz Instrumental Rationality: A Reprise By Joseph Raz1 HE OPPORTUNITY TO REPLY to four challenging comments enables me not only to remove some misunderstandings, but also to Tdevelop some ideas regarding which “The Myth of Instrumental Ra- tionality” (“The Myth,” as I shall refer to it) was silent or even misleading. First let me set out the main theses of The Myth. Assuming, as I do, that facts about the value of kinds of action constitute reasons for or against them, and that “rationality” or “irrationality” (or de- grees of either) refer either to the capacity to appreciate and respond appro- priately to reasons, or (in other contexts) to the way it is exercised, I argued that:2 1) There are instrumental or as, for reasons given, I call them “facilita- tive” reasons: When we have an undefeated reason to take an action we have reason to perform any one (but only one) of the possible (for us) alternative plans which facilitate it.3 2) The rationality or lack of it displayed in our reactions to our own ends – in particular adopting what we believe are means to their realization, or our failure to adopt such means – consists in the exercise or failure to exercise properly the same capacity, and in conforming with or violating the same principles of rationality, which we exercise or fail to exercise, conform to or fail to conform to in other contexts. The supposition that there is a special type of rationality, or of rational principles, to which “instrumental rational- ity” refers is the myth of the title of my article.
    [Show full text]
  • The Models of Space, Time and Vision in V. Nabokov's Fiction
    Tartu Semiotics Library 5 2 THE MODELS OF SPACE, TIME AND VISION Tartu Semiootika Raamatukogu 5 Тартуская библиотека семиотики 5 Ruumi, aja ja vaate mudelid V. Nabokovi proosas: Narratiivistrateegiad ja kultuurifreimid Marina Grišakova Mодели пространства, времени и зрения в прозе В. Набокова: Нарративные стратегии и культурные фреймы Марина Гришакова University of Tartu The Models of Space, Time and Vision in V. Nabokov’s Fiction: Narrative Strategies and Cultural Frames Marina Grishakova Tartu 2012 4 THE MODELS OF SPACE, TIME AND VISION Edited by Silvi Salupere Series editors: Peeter Torop, Kalevi Kull, Silvi Salupere Address of the editorial office: Department of Semiotics University of Tartu Jakobi St. 2 Tartu 51014, Estonia http://www.ut.ee/SOSE/tsl.htm This publication has been supported by Cultural Endowment of Estonia Department of Literature and the Arts, University of Tampere Cover design: Inna Grishakova Aleksei Gornõi Rauno Thomas Moss Copyright University of Tartu, 2006 ISSN 2228-2149 (online) ISBN 978-9949-32-068-4 (online) Second revised edition available online only. ISSN 1406-4278 (print) ISBN 978–9949–11–306–4 (2006 print edition) Tartu University Press www.tyk.ee In memory of Yuri Lotman, the teacher 6 THE MODELS OF SPACE, TIME AND VISION Table of Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................... 9 Introduction ............................................................................... 11 I. Models and Metaphors..........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Answering the Real Question About Fictive Emotions by Kyle Furlane
    A Thesis entitled Beyond the Paradox: Answering the Real Question about Fictive Emotions by Kyle Furlane Submitted to the Graduate Faculty as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Arts Degree in Philosophy _________________________________________ Dr. Charles Blatz, Committee Chair _________________________________________ Dr. John Sarnecki, Committee Member _________________________________________ Dr. Ammon Allred, Committee Member _________________________________________ Dr. Patricia R. Komuniecki, Dean College of Graduate Studies The University of Toledo May 2012 Copyright 2012, Kyle Furlane This document is copyrighted material. Under copyright law, no parts of this document may be reproduced without the expressed permission of the author. An Abstract of Beyond the Paradox: Answering the Real Question about Fictive Emotions by Kyle Furlane Submitted to the Graduate Faculty as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Arts Degree in Philosophy The University of Toledo May 2012 Across cultures, people have engagements with fictions which can result in physiological and psychological responses. These responses are what I call fictive emotions. Fictive emotions, though phenomenologically similar to other types of emotions, are distinct in that they seem to be a reaction to characters and events that do not exist. This observation has lead philosophers to ask three questions about fictive emotions: the conceptual (Are fictive emotions possible?), the normative (Are fictive emotions rational?), and the causal(How is it that fictions can cause fictive emotions?). In the past, philosophers have focused almost exclusively on the conceptual and normative questions, avoiding the more important causal question. In the following I explain why a focus on the conceptual and normative questions is misguided and the superior benefits of working toward an answer to the causal question.
    [Show full text]