Quick viewing(Text Mode)

Adoption of Unapproved Varieties of Bt Cotton in Pakistan: Impact on Production and Trade

Adoption of Unapproved Varieties of Bt Cotton in Pakistan: Impact on Production and Trade

Adoption of Unapproved Varieties of Bt Cotton in : Impact on Production and Trade

By Hina Nazli PhD Candidate, Food Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Guelph, Canada

Presentation for the Brown Bag Seminar at IFPRI September 9, 2009 Plan of Presentation • Background

• Why unapproved Bt cotton in Pakistan

• Bt cotton survey 2009

• Conclusions and direction for future research

2 Importance of Cotton for Pakistan • 4th largest producer

• 3rd largest consumer

• Cotton and textiles contribute – 10% to GDP – 21% to employment – 60% to export earnings (yarn and finished textile products)

• Cotton farmers’ problem – high fluctuations in yield (pest infestation) – high cost of production (38% on plant protection)

3 Yield per hectare in Selected Countries

1400

1200 World China 1000 Pakistan 800

600 Kg/hectare

400

200

0

1976 2006 1970 1972 1974 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 2000 2002 2004 2008

1990 1990 1992 1996 1998 1994 1994

4 GM cotton is considered a solution to farmer’s problem • GM cotton is obtained by inserting the gene of soil born bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) into cotton seed. This gene produces Cry protein that is harmful to the larvae of moths and butterflies, beetles, and flies

• Cost advantages – Reduces the number of sprays => Reduces pesticide expenditure – Labor saving

• Yield advantages

• Higher profitability than conventional varieties – Despite higher price of seed

• Health and environmental advantages – Lower exposure to hazardous pesticides 5 Comparison of cost and yield between Bt and non-Bt varieties in China and India

Diff in number of Gross margin pesticide Percentage difference in Bt and non-Bt (rev-cost) sprays varieties (US$/ha) Pesticide Seed cost cost Total cost Yield Bt Non Bt

China (2001) -- -58.1 333.3 -27.5 10.9 277 -225

India (2006)

Gujrat -- -- 136.8 13.7 35.4 713 405

Maharashtra -1.9 -21.3 192.4 36.5 46.3 503 318

Andhra Pradesh -3.8 -25.8 173.1 5.6 44.6 418 121

Tamil Nadu -2.0 -54.5 237.0 13.7 28.5 339 128

6 Bt Cotton in Pakistan • Cotton is grown in two provinces: (80%), (20%)

• Private breeders developed Bt type varieties by using Monsanto’s transforming event MON531 (Bollgard)

• PARC conducted a detailed scientific survey in 2008

– 50% of the cotton growing area in Punjab and 80% in Sindh was under these unapproved Bt type varieties – 39 unapproved varieties of Bt cotton were under cultivation. – 10% of the sample in Punjab and 19% in Sindh were not positive for the Cry protein – Variation in intensity of protein expression from high concentration to low – Non-uniform plant population

•  variable and unknown quality of seed – seed mixing – spurious seed

7 Why Unapproved Bt Cotton? • Slow progress in agricultural biotech research (initiated in 1981) – Mainly 2 public institutions and many private breeders are involved – Weak research infrastructure – Weak institutional support – Lack of coordination

• Lack of political will to adopt biotechnology (slow progress in the legislation process) – Convention on Biodiversity (CBD) was signed in 1992 – Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety was signed in 2001 but not ratified until 2009 – Biosafety guidelines and the rules approved in April 2005 – An independent body, the Intellectual Property Organization - Pakistan (IPOP) has been formed in 2005 – Amendments in the Plant Breeders’ Right Act and Seed Act are still awaiting approval from the parliament 8 Current Situation

• For the approval of a GM variety, a three tier system is introduced – Institutional biosafety committee (IBC), Technical advisory committee (TAC), National biosafety committee (NBC) – Variety IBC  TAC  NBC IPOP NBC field trials

• No variety was submitted to NBC for approval until 2008 – Fear of infringement of Monsanto’s patent rights – Fear of law suit and trade sanctions if infringement is found

• The GoP recently approved the field trials for six Bt cotton varieties and allowed the import of hybrid seed from India and China for field trials

• The commercial Bt seed is expected to be available for the 2010-11 planting season 9 Issues Raised in Public Debate

• IPR

• Technical issues – Bt varieties are ineffective for sucking pests (CLCV) – Lack of awareness about the use of biotechnology

• Market issues – Uncertain seed quality – Inefficient seed pricing – Confidence of farmers on approved varieties – Impact on textile sector (quality of fiber)

• Social issues – Uneven distribution of benefits (raised by NGOs) – Issue of food security (long duration)

10 Bt Cotton Survey 2009 • PARC (2008) survey examined the presence/absence of Cry protein in the existing Bt varieties

• PARC survey did not collect information on the economic performance of these varieties in Pakistan

• Bt Cotton Survey 2009 aims to examine the economic impact of the unapproved Bt varieties on cost of production, yield and gross margin in Pakistan

11 Agro-climatic Zones of Pakistan

China

Iran

Indian Ocean

12 Sample Selection Methodology

• The selected sample is drawn from the existing sampling frame of the Pakistan Rural Household Survey (PRHS) (2 rounds) – 4 cotton growing districts in 2 provinces

• One district selected from each province based on the share of cotton production in the province ( in Punjab and in Sindh) – 16 villages, 208 cotton farmers

• Survey conducted during February-March 2009 (difficult security situation)

• How representative are these districts of cotton growing areas

13 Selected Sample – Bt Cotton Survey 2009

China

Bahawalpur Iran

Mirpur Khas

Indian Ocean

14 Basic Facts – Selected Sample

CW-Punjab CW -Sindh Incidence of poverty (%) 55.51 56.81 % of rural population 17.47 11.20 % of rural poor 20.13 13.21 Bahawalpur Mirpur Khas Development Rank 64/100 65/100 Weather Hot and dry Hot and humid Soil quality Sandy Clay Average distance (in km) between selected villages and major facilities Distance to seed/fertilizer/pesticide shop 15 12 Distance to ZTBL 18 17 Distance to nearest clinic/dispensary 3 5 Distance to secondary girls school 13 11 Distance to secondary boys school 11 9 15 Percentage Distribution of Farmers by Operated Land

60.0 55.8 52.9 Bhawalpur Mirpur Khas 50.0

40.0

30.0 farmers 24.0 % % 19.2 20.0 14.4 11.5 9.6 10.0 6.7 3.8 1.9 0.0 Less than 5 acres 5 to under 12.5 12.5 to under 25 25 to under 50 50 acres and acres acres acres above

16 Type of Tenure

90.0

77.9 Bahawalpur 80.0 73.1 Mirpur Khas 70.0

60.0

50.0

farmers 40.0 % %

30.0 23.1 20.0 12.5 9.6 10.0 3.8 0.0 Owner operator Sharecropper and tenant Owner cum sharecropper

17 Adoption of Bt Cotton

100%

90% Bahawalpur

80% Mirpur Khas

70%

60%

50%

% farmers % 40%

30%

20%

10%

0% 2006 2007 2008

18 Type of Cotton Grown

100.0 90.0 86.5 Bhawalpur 80.0 Mirpur Khas 70.0 58.7 60.0

50.0 farmers

% % 40.0 30.0 27.9

20.0 13.5 9.6 10.0 3.8 0.0 Bt only Non-Bt only Both Bt and non-Bt

19 Sources of Bt Cotton Seed

100

90 86.8 Bhawalpur 80 Mirpur Khas 70 58.2 60

50 farmers

% % 40 34.7 30

20 10 5.3 7.1 6.6 0 Seed dealer Fellow farmer Landlord

20 Awareness about Bt Technology among Farmers

20 18.4 Bahawalpur 18 Mirpur Khas 16

14 13.26 yes’ 12

10

8

6 3.94

% farmers responded ‘ responded farmers % 4 2.04 2

0 Do you know that poor quality of Bt seed Do you know about the refuge area may not be effective to control pests

21 Seed Expenditure (Rs/acre)

1600 1,381 Bt 1400 Non-Bt 1200 1,148

1000 838 800

Rs/acre 652 600 Significantly Significantly different 400 different

200

0 Bahawalpur Mirpur Khas

22 Total Pesticide Expenditure (Rs/acre)

3,500 3,238 Bt Non-Bt 3,000 2,636 2,555 2,500

2,000 1,929

significantly Rs/acre 1,500 different significantly different 1,000

500

- Bahawalpur Mirpur Khas

23 Number of pesticide Sprays

5 4.04 Bt 4 3.88 Non-Bt 3.50 4 3.12 3 2.60 2.67 3

2 1.54 2

Number ofsprays 1.18 1 Significantly Significantly 1 different different

0 Bollworm spray Non Bollworm spray Bollworm spray Non Bollworm spray

Bahawalpur Mirpur Khas

24 Pesticide Expenditure (Rs/acre)

4,000 3,488 3,500 Bt 3,073 2,993 Non-Bt 3,000 2,667 2,605 2,500 2,093

2,000 1,846 Rs/acre 1,500 1,259 Significantly 1,000 different Significantly 500 different

- Bollworm spray Non Bollworm spray Bollworm spray Non Bollworm spray

Bahawalpur Mirpur Khas

25 Total expenditure (Rs/acre)

16,000 Bt Non-Bt 14,000

12,000

10,000

8,000 Rs/acre 6,000

4,000

2,000

- Bahawalpur Mirpur Khas

26 Yield (Kg/acre)

1,000 Bt Non-Bt 900

800

700

600

500 Rs/acre 400 Significantly 300 different 200

100

- Bahawalpur Mirpur Khas

27 Revenue (Rs/acre)

30,000 Bt Non-Bt 25,000

20,000

15,000 Rs/acre

10,000 Significantly different

5,000

- Bahawalpur Mirpur Khas 28 Gross Margin (Rs/acre)

16,000 Bt Non-Bt 14,000

12,000

10,000

8,000 Rs/acre

6,000 Significantly 4,000 different

2,000

- Bahawalpur Mirpur Khas

29 Characteristics of Adopters and Non- adopters Individual Characteristics Household Characteristics Farm characteristics Age (years) Household size Operated land (acres) Experience in cotton farming (years) (+*) Number of dependents Owned land (acres) Education (years) Own motorcycle (yes=1) Cotton area as % of Kharif area Degree of risk aversion (-*) Own TV (yes=1) Value of livestock (Rs/animal) (+*) Have telephone (yes=1) Agricultural credit (yes=1) Crop income (Rs/year) Livestock income (Rs/year) Other income (Rs/year) (-*) Total income (Rs/year) Share of food expenditure (-*) Share of education expenditure (+*) 30 Summary of Findings • Technical issues – Low levels of awareness among farmers about Bt technology – The impact of Bt varieties differs across two districts

• Market issues – Adoption rate is high among both owners and sharecroppers – Pesticide expenditure is lower and seed expenditure is higher on Bt varieties – Higher revenue – Profitable for farmers

• Social issues – Both owners and sharecroppers get the benefit

31 Comparison of Pakistan’s Unapproved Bt Varieties with China and India’s Approved Bt Varieties

# of Percentage difference in Bt and non-Bt Gross margin sprays varieties (US$/ha) Pesticide Seed cost cost Total cost Yield Bt Non Bt

China (2001) -- -58.1 333.3 -27.5 10.9 277 -225

India (2006)

Gujrat -- -- 136.8 13.7 35.4 713 405

Maharashtra -1.9 -21.3 192.4 36.5 46.3 503 318

Andhra Pradesh -3.8 -25.8 173.1 5.6 44.6 418 121

Tamil Nadu -2.0 -54.5 237.0 13.7 28.5 339 128

Pakistan (2009)

Bahawalpur -0.90 -21.07 64.9 -4.19 5.86 452 384

Mirpur Khas -1.86 -26.81 76.3 4.54 39.27 408 230 32 Future Directions for Research • Need for a national survey – Due to the high diversity of cotton growing areas, more location-specific information and larger sample size is required

• Need for further analysis – Can Pakistan come out of unregulated market after the commercialization of Bt cotton?

33 Thank You