Offshore Wind in the North East

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Offshore Wind in the North East Offshore wind is an essential part of RenewableUK and partner the UK’s energy mix and industrial companies are working to deliver strategy. Offshore wind already Offshore Wind Week 2016, which generates 5 per cent of the UK’s will run from 31 October to 4 electricity and by 2020 this will double November and celebrate the growth to over 10 per cent. Building out the of this industry and the benefits it current pipeline of offshore wind is delivering for Britain. Bringing projects could supply over a third of together companies from across the UK’s power needs. The industry the UK, Offshore Wind Week aims is investing over £18bn in projects to help deepen policymakers over the next five years and offshore understanding of, and support for, wind will be one of the lowest cost the offshore wind industry. sources of new power in the 2020s. Offshore Wind Week Partners October 2016 Offshore Wind in the North East Image courtesy of JDR Cables The North East of England has the potential to power over 3.3 million homes if the wind farms in the region are developed and deployed to their full capacity. The region is the home to the UK’s first offshore wind farm, The Round 3 Zone, Dogger Bank, has also received full Blyth Offshore Wind Farm and will soon be home to the consent and will consist of 4 offshore wind farms of up to Blyth Offshore Wind Demonstrator. The Blyth Offshore Wind 1.2GW, all of which will be at least 80 miles from shore. The Demonstrator will be the world’s first offshore wind farm to wind farms in the Dogger Bank Zone will sit on the ancient use 66kV technology which hopes to demonstrate increased Doggerland which had previously connected the United efficiency of the wind farm. In addition, the Offshore Kingdom to mainland Europe during the last Ice Age. Renewable Energy (ORE) Catapult’s testing site at Blyth is an innovation hub for the offshore wind industry and will shortly be welcoming the world’s largest offshore wind blade, Our vision is of renewable energy playing a leading role in powering the UK. manufactured by LM Wind Power, who have chosen the facility to test their 88.4 metre blade. RenewableUK is the UK’s leading renewable Acting as a central point of information and a energy trade association, specialising in onshore united, representative voice for our membership, wind, offshore wind and wave & tidal energy. we conduct research; find solutions; organise Formed in 1978, we have an established, large events, facilitate business development, lobby corporate membership ranging from small and promote wind and marine renewables to independent companies, to large international government, industry, the media and the public. corporations and manufacturers. Wind farms Owner/Operator Capacity (MW) Operational Blyth Offshore E.ON 4 RenewableUK Members engaged in offshore wind in the North East include: Teesside EDF Energy 62 Consented Blyth Offshore Wind Demonstrator EDF Energy 40 Able UK, Advanced Industrial Solutions (AIS), AECOM, Arcadis LLP, Bond Dickinson, Cathie Associates, DeepOcean, EDF Energy Renewables, EDS Group, Falck Safety Services, Hydratight, JDR Cable Systems, Maersk Training, ORE Catapult, OGN Group (Aquind), PD Ports, Port of Blyth, Innogy Renewables Dogger Bank Teesside A&B SSE Renewables, Innogy Renewables UK, Statoil, Statkraft 2400 UK Ltd, Safety Technology Limited, Siemens Energy, Soil Machine Dynamics, South Tyneside College, Steel River Consultants, TNEI Services Limited, Vattenfall Wind Power, Wind Prospect Dogger Bank Creyke Beck A&B SSE Renewables, Innogy Renewables UK, Statoil, Statkraft 2400 MPI Offshore JDR Cable Systems Skills and training 3 Stokesley 6 Hartlepool Offshore Wind The North East is home to a number MPI Offshore provides a number JDR offer the design and of dedicated skills and training of services to the offshore wind manufacture of inter-array cables facilities. industry including the installation connecting offshore wind turbines. in the North East In collaboration with the Port of of foundations and turbines, JDR first entered the offshore Tyne, Northumberland College have consultancy, workboats, technicians wind market in 2006 following on invested £1.2m in a Wind Hub and and engineers. from a contract with the Beatrice Renewable Energies Centre. The company has won a number Demonstrator Project in Scotland. The £8m Siemens Training of contracts for projects including 2008 was a key year for the Centre has dedicated areas where Rampion and Dudgeon Offshore company, with their first full project Key to UK Offshore Wind Farm Sites employees and apprentices are Wind Farms in the UK and Nordsee 1 award (Greater Gabbard) and their trained in an environment closely and Sandbank Offshore Wind Farms Hartlepool site approved. Round 1 Round 3 Zones resembling what they will experience in Germany. Since then the company has won Round 2 Demonstration Sites in the field. multiple contracts with windfarms Round 1&2 Extensions A number of other companies across the UK and Germany with operate training centres in the North Tekmar contracts in the range of £10m to East including Maersk Training (North 4 Newton Aycliffe £30m. Shields), Safety Technology( South Approximately 500 people are Shields), South Tyneside College Tekmar has been active in the employed at the firm with 50% of the (South Shields) and Falck Safety offshore subsea sector for over 30 workforce working in offshore wind. Services (Billingham). years and first entered the offshore In addition, the company runs an wind market in 2007 through the annual apprenticeship scheme. development of a cable protection JDR recently invested circa £10m DeepOcean system for the Hooksiel demonstrator in an extension to the Hartlepool 1 Darlington project in Germany. Since then, the facility including new carousels and company has supplied 4800 cable a state of the art layup machine for DeepOcean has been active in protection systems for 43 projects cable and umbilical manufacture. offshore wind for eight years, across seven countries and three In addition, JDR has invested providing the installation and continents, with contracts usually significantly in new technology protection of subsea power cables, ranging from £1m to £8m. developments, including recently seabed survey, site investigation, Approximately 110 out of the a 66kV full subsea power cable subsea inspection, maintenance and company’s 130 employees work system, as well as pioneering the repair services. across the offshore wind projects design of inter-array cables in the The company employs 250 delivered by Tekmar. offshore energy industry, contributing individuals in the UK, all of whom Tekmar has recently opened to cost reduction targets with work on offshore wind projects. a new 80 000 sq foot production innovations such as aluminium cores. Following on from successful facility and is now investing in a new contract awards in offshore wind, R&D facility. DeepOcean have been able to create The company is headquartered over 30 engineering and operational in Newton Aycliffe and also has Project Spotlight positions in the UK. representation across USA, UAE, Dogger Bank Teesside A&B DeepOcean has most recently Germany, Singapore and China. Blyth Offshore Wind Demo Blyth Offshore secured contacts on Race Bank and EDF Energy Renewables The Blyth Offshore Wind Demonstrator Blyth Offshore Wind Demo Walney Extension Offshore Wind 5 Farms in the UK, and Bligh Bank and Offshore Renewable will showcase a number of innovations. Nemo Link in Belgium. 5 Energy Catapult The project will comprise of up Blyth to 15 turbines which will be installed on self-floating and submersible Offshore Structures Britain Established in 2013 by UK gravity-base foundations, which will 2 (OSB) Government, the Offshore be designed and built by Royal BAM Dogger Bank Creyke Beck A&B Stockton on Tees Renewable Energy (ORE) Catapult is Group in the Neptune Dry Dock on 6 Teesside a technology innovation and research the River Tyne. The project will also be 4 In 2014, Offshore Structures Britain centre with the aim of reducing the the first offshore wind project to use 2 1 3 (a joint venture between Bladt cost of offshore renewable energy, 66kV cable technology to link the wind Industries and EEW SPC) acquired supporting the growth of the UK farm to the onshore substation; this the assets of TAG Energy Solutions. industry. represents a step forward in testing OSB were awarded a contract for the The site at Blyth is home to two the efficiency and cost reduction manufacture of 16 transition pieces blade test facilities, including the impact of this technology. for the Burbo Bank Extension. OSB world’s largest indoor blade test has created approximately 300 jobs facility at 100m, a 15 megawatt This map demonstrates the spread of UK companies since the acquisition of the former TAG power train test facility and a high involved in offshore wind in the North East representing the energy site. voltage electrical lab which carried employment and wider economic benefit from companies out the world’s first accelerated doing business in offshore wind. lifetime testing of 66kV cabling. N.B. The case studies included are intended to provide a representation of the types of projects and companies active across the offshore wind supply chain. All information in this document is provided by RenewableUK and has been sourced from either Offshore Wind Week Partners or publically available information. The information is correct as of October 2016.
Recommended publications
  • Appendix 6.1: List of Cumulative Projects
    Appendix 6.1 Long list of cumulative projects considered within the EIA Report GoBe Consultants Ltd. March 2018 List of Cumulative Appendix 6.1 Projects 1 Firth of Forth and Tay Offshore Wind Farms Inch Cape Offshore Wind (as described in the decision notices of Scottish Ministers dated 10th October 2014 and plans referred to therein and as proposed in the Scoping Report submitted to MS-LOT in May 2017) The consented project will consist of up to 110 wind turbines and generating up to 784 MW situated East of the Angus Coast in the outer Forth and Tay. It is being developed by Inch Cape Offshore Windfarm Ltd (ICOL). This project was consented in 2014, but was subject to Judicial Review proceedings (see section 1.4.1.1 of the EIA Report for full details) which resulted in significant delays. Subsequently ICOL requested a Scoping Opinion for a new application comprising of 75 turbines with a generating capacity of 784 MW. Project details can be accessed at: http://www.inchcapewind.com/home Seagreen Alpha and Bravo (as described in the decision notices of Scottish Ministers dated 10th October 2014 and plans referred to therein and as Proposed in the Scoping Report submitted to MS-LOT in May 2017) The consents for this project includes two offshore wind farms, being developed by Seagreen Wind Energy Limited (SWEL), each consisting of up to 75 wind turbines and generating up to 525 MW. This project was consented in 2014, but was subject to Judicial Review proceedings (see section 1.4.1.1 of the EIA Report for full details) which resulted in significant delays.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Reef Effects of Offshore Wind Farm Strucurse and Potential for Enhancement and Mitigation
    REVIEW OF REEF EFFECTS OF OFFSHORE WIND FARM STRUCTURES AND POTENTIAL FOR ENHANCEMENT AND MITIGATION JANUARY 2008 IN ASSOCIATION WITH Review of the reef effects of offshore wind farm structures and potential for enhancement and mitigation Report to the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform PML Applications Ltd in association with Scottish Association of Marine Sciences (SAMS) Contract No : RFCA/005/00029P This report may be cited as follows: Linley E.A.S., Wilding T.A., Black K., Hawkins A.J.S. and Mangi S. (2007). Review of the reef effects of offshore wind farm structures and their potential for enhancement and mitigation. Report from PML Applications Ltd and the Scottish Association for Marine Science to the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (BERR), Contract No: RFCA/005/0029P Acknowledgements Acknowledgements The Review of Reef Effects of Offshore Wind Farm Structures and Potential for Enhancement and Mitigation was prepared by PML Applications Ltd and the Scottish Association for Marine Science. This project was undertaken as part of the UK Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (BERR) offshore wind energy research programme, and managed on behalf of BERR by Hartley Anderson Ltd. We are particularly indebted to John Hartley and other members of the Research Advisory Group for their advice and guidance throughout the production of this report, and to Keith Hiscock and Antony Jensen who also provided detailed comment on early drafts. Numerous individuals have also contributed their advice, particularly in identifying data resources to assist with the analysis. We are particularly indebted to Angela Wratten, Chris Jenner, Tim Smyth, Mark Trimmer, Francis Bunker, Gero Vella, Robert Thornhill, Julie Drew, Adrian Maddocks, Robert Lillie, Tony Nott, Ben Barton, David Fletcher, John Leballeur, Laurie Ayling and Stephen Lockwood – who in the course of passing on information also contributed their ideas and thoughts.
    [Show full text]
  • UK Windfarm Load Factors 2006 by Site
    UK Windfarm Load Factors 2006 By Site The most recent date of ROC issue on the Renewable Obligation Certificate Register available from the Ofgem web site included in the analysis was 25th April 2007. The two monthly figures shown are the actual number of ROC's issued and this figure expressed as a percentage of the the ROC's which could be issued if the output was continually at the at the maximum DNC value, without interruption, for the complete month. The cumulative annual figures are included, where the figures given against each location are the actual number of ROC's issued during the year, the possible number of ROC's which could be issued if the output was continually at the maximum DNC value and actual output expressed as a percentage of this figure. This is the annual load (capacity) factor of each location. Most recent ROC issue date 25 April 2007 For year 2006 Annual output by technology Actual Possible % Median of Individual MWh MWh Monthly % Values Biomass 985214 1759199 56.00 55.19 Co-firing of biomass with fossil fuel 2456733 230290215 1.07 0.91 Biomass and waste using ACT 11496 26114 44.02 48.59 Micro hydro 55815 121504 45.94 46.23 Hydro <20 MW DNC 2049389 4977685 41.17 37.68 Landfill gas 4168045 6718018 62.04 63.76 Waste using an ACT 1224 11529 10.62 11.44 Off-shore wind 685819 2503109 27.40 27.18 On-shore wind 3530914 13767395 25.65 26.58 Wind 4216733 16270504 25.92 Sewage gas 333578 655003 50.93 51.91 Wave power 9 1452 0.62 0.56 PV 131 1770 7.40 7.45 Contribution to annual total renewable energy generation Biomass
    [Show full text]
  • Structure, Equipment and Systems for Offshore Wind Farms on the OCS
    Structure, Equipment and Systems for Offshore Wind Farms on the OCS Part 2 of 2 Parts - Commentary pal Author, Houston, Texas Houston, Texas pal Author, Project No. 633, Contract M09PC00015 Prepared for: Minerals Management Service Department of the Interior Dr. Malcolm Sharples, Princi This draft report has not been reviewed by the Minerals Management Service, nor has it been approved for publication. Approval, when given, does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Service, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. Offshore : Risk & Technology Consulting Inc. December 2009 MINERALS MANAGEMENT SERVICE CONTRACT Structure, Equipment and Systems for Offshore Wind on the OCS - Commentary 2 MMS Order No. M09PC00015 Structure, Equipment and Systems: Commentary Front Page Acknowledgement– Kuhn M. (2001), Dynamics and design optimisation of OWECS, Institute for Wind Energy, Delft Univ. of Technology TABLE OF CONTENTS Authors’ Note, Disclaimer and Invitation:.......................................................................... 5 1.0 OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................... 6 MMS and Alternative Energy Regulation .................................................................... 10 1.1 Existing Standards and Guidance Overview..................................................... 13 1.2 Country Requirements. ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • English Translation of Law Comment 1991 Stromeinspeise-Gesetzes (Steg) Electricity Feed Act Tariff Set at 90% of Consumer Prices
    The World Bank Asia Sustainable and Public Disclosure Authorized Alternative Energy Program Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized China Meeting the Challenges of Offshore and Large-Scale Wind Power: Regulatory Review of Offshore Wind in Five European Countries Public Disclosure Authorized China: Meeting the Challenges of Offshore and Large-Scale Wind Power Joint publication of the National Energy Administration of China and the World Bank Supported by the Australian Agency for International Development and ASTAE Copyright © 2010 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank Group 1818 H Street, NW Washington, DC 20433, USA All rights reserved First printing: May 2010 Manufactured in the United States of America. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Australian Agency for International Development. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this report are entirely those of the authors and should not be attributed in any manner to the World Bank, or its affiliated organizations, or to members of its board of executive directors or the countries they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility whatsoever for any consequence of their use. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this volume do not imply on the part of the World Bank Group any judgment on the legal status of any territory or the
    [Show full text]
  • Torness Monthly Report August 2017
    Torness monthly report August 2017 Introduction We are keen to hear the views of our local communities. We recognise that good communication is a two way process and we welcome your feedback and comments. While we will do our best to always use plain English, talking about our business sometimes involves specific terminology, and you will find a glossary of any terms used at the end of each monthly report. Safety • The station had zero lost time incidents (LTI) during the reporting period. EDF Energy staff have had 448 LTI free days (more than a year) up to 31 August and contract partners have had 1148 LTI free days up to 31 August – that’s more than three years. • The station had no emergency services call outs during August. • There were two first aid injuries at the station in August. • The station had no environmental events during August and has gone 2390 days without an environmental event (over six years). Station output Two flasks containing spent fuel were safely transported to Sellafield for reprocessing during the period. Both reactors were operational for the whole month. Station news Torness teams up with Police Scotland to improve road safety Torness power station and Police Scotland have been working hard to teach apprentices about the dangers of taking risks whilst driving. The station recently joined forces with Police Scotland to improve road safety by carrying out a number of road safety presentations. The Young Driver Early Intervention was aimed at educating younger drivers (17-25) on the consequences of excess speed and hazards associated with inexperience and bravado.
    [Show full text]
  • Application for a Marine Licence Under Part 4 of The
    APPLICATION FOR A MARINE LICENCE UNDER PART 4 OF THE MARINE (SCOTLAND) ACT 2010 AND UNDER PART 4 OF THE MARINE AND COASTAL ACCESS ACT 2009 (AS AMENDED) TO CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE 5 FLOATING WIND TURBINES IN THE BUCHAN DEEP, APPROXIMATELY 25 KM OFF THE COAST OF PETERHEAD, NORTH EAST SCOTLAND MARINE SCOTLAND’S CONSIDERATION OF A PROPOSAL AFFECTING DESIGNATED SPECIAL AREAS OF CONSERVATION (“SACs”) OR SPECIAL PROTECTION AREAS (“SPAs”) SITE DETAILS: Hywind Scotland Pilot Project (“Hywind”) approximately 25 km off the North East coast of Scotland near Peterhead FILE REF: Appropriate Assessment Conclusion Marine Scotland Licensing Operations Team (“MS-LOT”) concludes that, based upon the content of the following assessment the proposed Hywind Development will not, on its own or in combination with other developments already licensed (including the Forth and Tay offshore wind farms) adversely affect the integrity of the Buchan Ness to Collieston Coast SPA, Fowlsheugh SPA, Forth Islands SPA or Moray Firth SAC (where each SPA or SAC is taken as a whole), provided that the conditions set out in 3d are complied with. Following Marine Scotland Science (“MSS”) advice, MS-LOT consider that the most up to date and best scientific evidence available has been used in reaching the conclusion that any decision to approve the Hywind Development will not adversely affect the integrity of the sites concerned and are satisfied that no reasonable scientific doubt remains. Introduction This is a record of the Appropriate Assessment (“AA”) for the Hywind Development and associated offshore transmission works. The assessment has been undertaken by MS-LOT and MSS on behalf of the Scottish Ministers.
    [Show full text]
  • Spotlight on Northern Ireland Regional Focus
    COMMUNICATION HUB FOR THE WIND ENERGY INDUSTRY ‘TITANIC’ SPOTLIGHT ON NORTHERN IRELAND REGIONAL FOCUS GLOBAL WIND ALLIANCE COMPETEncY BasED TRaininG FEBRUARY/MARCH 2012 | £5.25 www.windenergynetwork.co.uk INTRODUCTION COMMUNICATING YOUR THOUGHTS AND OPINIONS WIND ENERGY NETWORK TV CHANNEL AND ONLINE LIBRARY These invaluable industry resources continue to build and we are very YOU WILL FIND WITHIN THIS We hope you enjoy the content and pleased with the interest and support EDITION CONTRIBUTIONS WHICH please feel free to contact us to make of our proposed sponsors. Please give COULD BE DESCRIBED AS OPINION your feelings known – it’s good to talk. the team a call and find out how to get PIECES. THEY ARE THERE TO FOCUS involved in both. ATTENTION ON VERY IMPORTANT ‘SpoTLIGHT ON’ regIONAL FOCUS SUBJECT AREAS WITH A VIEW Our regional focus in this edition features Remember they are free to TO GALVANISING OPINION AND Northern Ireland. Your editor visited contribute and free to access. BRINGING THE INDUSTRY TOGETHER the area in late November 2011 when TO ENSURE EFFECTIVE PROGRESS reporting on the Quo Vadis conference Please also feel free to contact us AND THEREFORE SUCCESS. and spent a very enjoyable week soaking if you wish to highlight any specific up the atmosphere, local beverages as area within the industry and we will Ray Sams from Spencer Coatings well the Irish hospitality (the craic). endeavour to encourage debate and features corrosion in marine steel feature the issue within our publication. structures, Warren Fothergill from As you will see it is a very substantial Group Safety Services on safety feature and the overall theme is one of passports and Michael Wilder from excitement and forward thinking which Petans on competency based training will ensure Northern Ireland is at the standardisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Blyth Offshore Demonstrator Wind Farm
    Blyth Offshore Demonstrator presentations and Q&A sessions To provide full details of the new wind farm and to answer any questions from members of the local public, EDF Energy Renewables is hosting two presentation events. Blyth Workspace, Commissioners Quay Blyth Offshore Tuesday, 20th June, 5.00pm - 6.30pm Thursday, 29th June, 5.00pm - 6.30pm Demonstrator The available capacity for the above events is limited and anyone interested in attending is asked to ring 0191 233 1300 or e mail [email protected] in advance of the events to confirm their attendance. Wind Farm ORE Catapult, Charles Parsons Technology Centre, High Quay, Blyth Thursday, 22nd June , 5.00pm - 6.30pm Additional future presentations may be arranged if local interest exceeds the available capacity of the venue. Blyth Offshore Demonstrator fact file: Turbines Weight Connection l Blyth will produce l Approximately l Blyth will save l Blyth will be enough green 36% of the approximately the first time electricity to l Blyth will install construction l Each Gravity 57,600 tonnes l Blyth will be a “float and power 8.0MW wind cost to be spent Based of CO2 emissions the first offshore submerge” approximately turbines with a in the UK Foundation will each year2 wind project to Gravity Based 34,000 UK power mode weigh over connect using Foundation is households1 uprating them 15,000 tonnes 66kV rated used for offshore to 8.3MW when fully export cables wind turbines installed Generation Investment Low Carbon Innovation 1 41.5MW installed x 0.369 offshore average load factor* x 8760 hours, divided by 3.938MWh annual domestic energy consumption per home** 2 41.5MW installed x 0.369 offshore average load factor* x 8760 hours x 430 grammes of CO2 saved per kilowatt hour***, divided by 1000 to correct for units *Digest of United Kingdom energy statistics 2016, DBEIS, July 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Offshore Wind Regenerating Regions - Investment and Innovation in the UK
    Offshore Wind Regenerating Regions - Investment and Innovation in the UK November 2017 Offshore Wind: Regenerating Regions - Investment and Innovation in the UK 1 1 RenewableUK RenewableUK is the not-for-profit trade association representing the onshore and offshore wind, wave and tidal energy industries and their supply chains, with over 400 member companies based throughout the county, from large multinationals to small businesses. All information in this document is provided by RenewableUK and has been sourced from either Offshore Wind Week partners or publicly available information. This information is correct as of October 2017 Front cover photo credit: Innogy 02 Offshore Wind: Regenerating Regions - Investment and Innovation in the UK Contents Foreword 4 Introduction 6 Summary of Offshore Wind Activity in the UK 7 East of England 8 Feature: Galloper Wind Farm 11 Feature: East Anglia ONE 12 North East 13 Feature: Evolving the Industrial Revolution 16 North West, Wales and Northern Ireland 17 Scotland 20 Feature: Beatrice Offshore Windfarm Limited 23 Feature: Innovation in Scotland 24 Feature: Moray Offshore Windfarm (East) Limited 25 South of England 26 Feature: MHI Vestas - Supply Chain Heroes 29 Yorkshire and The Humber 30 Feature: Triton Knoll 33 Feature: Ørsted: Hornsea Project One 34 Supported by Renewables 04 Offshore Wind: Regenerating Regions - Investment and Innovation in the UK Foreword This year, we found out that Britain has backed a winner. Offshore wind has fallen in cost by nearly 50% in just two and a half years. In achieving this, the industry has rewritten the rules for how to deliver cost reductions in energy through innovation and new business models.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Turbine Safety Complacency and Cover Up
    Home | Site Listings | Borders & Lothians | Northumberland | Durham | Wind Power | Property | Noise | SAFETY | Visuals | Birds | Landowners | Farm Turbines | Dirty Tricks | Press | Contacts | Links | WIND TURBINE SAFETY Quick Navigation: General articles on turbine safety Ice throw Local Accidents. Some UK Accidents. Accidents in other countries. COMPLACENCY AND COVER UP ‗Wind turbine accidents‘, You Tube. While few would contend that turbines are a major threat to public safety (most deaths and injuries are suffered by those transporting, erecting and maintaining turbines), the wind industry is marked by both a reluctance to admit to accidents and a tendency to cover up the failings of the technology.1 In 2011 RenewableUK admitted that there had been over 1,500 reported accidents/‗incidents‘ in the UK in the previous five years, some of which resulted in deaths and serious injuries. There is no requirement for accidents which do not cause death or injury to be reported. A Minister recently confirmed that, “Neither DECC, nor the Health and Safety Executive (HSE), collect specific data for wind turbine accidents.” 2 Most accidents are not noticed unless damage is spotted by the public and the press report it. Examples of industry cover-ups abound. The wind industry always tries to play down the frequency of turbine accidents: for example, in Cornwall in 2006, “Part of a wind turbine blade weighing more than half a ton snapped off and crashed into a field during high winds. Operators Cumbria Windfarms said the site has been running since April 1993 and nothing like this had happened there before.” It had, as several locals pointed out: in 1993, a month after the turbine park opened, they had had a similar accident.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Statement Link
    Blyth Offshore Demonstration Project Phase 2 – Supporting Environmental Information DOCUMENT REFERENCE: 1233849 NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED PAGE 1 OF 147 Blyth Offshore Demonstrator Phase 2 Works EDF RENEWABLES BMS DOCUMENT REF : 1233849 1 Document Control SIGN OFF Name (Role) Signature Date Mark Hazelton 14/12/2020 DOCUMENT CONTROL Document Number 1233849 Document Title Phase 2 – Supporting Environmental Information Rev. Date Description Prepared Checked Approved [dd mmm yyyy] 001 14/12/2020 Issue for submission SL RH MH NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED PAGE 2 OF 147 Blyth Offshore Demonstrator Phase 2 Works EDF RENEWABLES BMS DOCUMENT REF : 1233849 Contents 1 Document Control ....................................................................................................................................................... 2 Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................................................................ 6 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................ 8 2 Purpose of Report ....................................................................................................................................................... 9 3 Background and Project Description .......................................................................................................................... 10 3.1 Site Location and Layout ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]