IEA WIND ENERGY Annual Report 2008

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

IEA WIND ENERGY Annual Report 2008 IEA WIND ENERGY Annual Report 2008 Executive Committee for the Implementing Agreement for Co-operation in the Research, Development, and Deployment of Wind Energy Systems of the International Energy Agency July 2009 ISBN 0-9786383-3-6 IEA Wind 1 Front cover: The NedPower Mount Storm 264-MW wind energy project is located about 120 miles west of Washington, D.C. in Grant County, West Virginia. Owned by Do- minion and Shell WindEnergy Inc., the project began construction in 2006, consists of 132 wind turbines along 12 miles of the Allegheny Front, and can generate enough electricity to serve about 66,000 homes and businesses. Output from the wind farm will be sold into PJM Interconnection, a regional transmission operator and wholesale electricity market serving 51 million people in 13 states and the District of Columbia. Photo Credit: Vetter, Moe. 2 2008 Annual Report Foreword Under the auspices of the International Energy Agency (IEA*), the Implementing Agreement for Co-operation in the Research, Development, and Deployment of Wind En- ergy Systems (IEA Wind**) is a collaborative venture among 24 contracting parties from 20 Member Countries, the European Commission, and the European Wind Energy Association (EWEA). In this thirty-first IEA Wind Energy Annual Report, experts describe activities in the research, development and deployment of wind energy within their countries in Sec- tion II, Member Activities. The managers (Operating Agents) of the IEA Wind cooperative research Tasks report progress for the year and plans for the coming year in Section I, Imple- menting Agreement and Active Annexes. The Executive Summary compiles information from all countries and Tasks in a shorter format suitable for decision makers. This IEA Wind Energy Annual Report for 2008 is published by PWT Communications in Boulder, Colorado, United States, on behalf of the IEA Wind Executive Committee. It was edited by P. Weis-Taylor, with contributions from experts in participating organizations from Australia, Austria, Canada, Denmark, the European Commission, the EWEA, Finland, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy (two contracting parties), Japan, the Republic of Korea, Mexico, the Netherlands, Norway (two contracting parties), Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Swit- zerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Ana ESTANQUEIRO Chair of the Executive Committee 2006-2008 Patricia WEIS-TAYLOR Secretary to the Executive Committee 1998-present * The IEA was founded in 1974 within the framework of the Organization for Eco- nomic Co-operation and Development (OECD) to collaborate on international energy programs and carry out a comprehensive program about energy among Member Countries. In 2008, 28 countries and the European Commission participated in 42 Implementing Agreements of the IEA. OECD Member countries, non-Member countries, and interna- tional organisations may participate. For more information, visit www.iea.org. **The IEA Wind implementing agreement functions within a framework created by the International Energy Agency (IEA). Views and findings within this Annual Report do not necessarily represent the views or policies of the IEA Secretariat or of its individual member countries. Web site for additional information on IEA Wind www.ieawind.org IEA Wind 3 Message from the Chair Welcome to the 2008 IEA Wind Annual Report where we document the record in- creases in wind energy capacity and its contribution to satisfying electrical demand around the world! The member countries of IEA Wind added more than 17,000 megawatts (MW) with growth rates up to 58% over 2007. Amidst all of this work in our home countries, we managed to work together to achieve significant results in IEA Wind. Following the 2003 Strategic Plan, IEA Wind has addressed key issues of integration of wind power into the electricity system, offshore wind develop- ment, and social acceptance of wind energy projects. For example the final report of the first term of Task 25, Power Systems with Large Amounts of Wind Power showed that the impact of wind power can be controlled by appropriate grid connection requirements, ex- tension and reinforcement of transmission networks, and integration of wind power produc- tion forecasts into system and market operation. This work is having significant impact on expanded wind energy development. In 2008, we produced an End-of-Term Report documenting that the cooperative re- search tasks are rewarding participants with benefits totaling many times the value of the monetary and in-kind efforts they contribute. Industrial and utility participation is inform- ing the research tasks, and the information sharing and distribution of the ExCo is con- tributing to policy development in the Member Countries and at IEA. We extended our cooperation for another five years and approved a Strategic Plan to guide our work in 2009 through 2013. Also this year, work has been completed in two tasks on issues of offshore wind energy deployment and integration of wind and hydropower systems. Final reports are expected next year and this work will provide the foundation for continuing work in these areas. Four important tasks illustrating the importance of technical as well a social issues moved forward. Consumer labeling of small wind turbines demands technical expertise as well as policy sen- sitivity. Cost of wind energy will provide important methodologies to compare technologies and approaches. Social acceptance of wind energy projects will translate the findings of so- cial scientists into the language of planners, developers, and engineers to enhance the process of wind power development. And following on the successes of two previous tasks on aero- dynamics, a new task will bring the combined efforts of organizations in eleven countries to process and use the massive amounts of data collected by the European Union “MEXICO” aerodynamic experiment. Improving aerodynamic models is an important element of im- proving wind turbine durability. I personally have been honored to participate in the progress of IEA Wind and to serve as Chair these three years. Now I confidently pass these important duties on to Brian Smith of the United States. Ana Estanqueiro Chair of the Executive Committee, 2006 to 2008 4 2008 Annual Report Contents FOREWORD .................................................................................................................3 Message from the Chair .....................................................................................................4 CONTENTS ....................................................................................................................5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..............................................................................................7 SECTION I The Implementing Agreement and Active Tasks Chapter 1 The Implementing Agreement .......................................................................31 Chapter 2 Base Technology Information Exchange - Task 11 ...........................................37 Chapter 3 Wind Energy in Cold Climates – Task 19 ........................................................43 Chapter 4 Offshore Wind Energy Technology Deployment – Task 23 ..............................47 Chapter 5 Integration of Wind and Hydropower Systems – Task 24 .................................53 Chapter 6 Power Systems with Large Amounts of Wind Power – Task 25 ........................58 Chapter 7 Cost of Wind Energy – Task 26 ......................................................................64 Chapter 8 Consumer Labeling of Small Wind Turbines – Task 27 ....................................67 Chapter 9 Social Acceptance of Wind Energy Projects – Task 28 .....................................70 Chapter 10 MexNex(T): Analysis of Wind Tunnel Measurements and Improvement of Aerodynamic Models – Task 29 ....................................................................74 SECTION II Member Activities Chapter 11 Australia .......................................................................................................79 Chapter 12 Austria ..........................................................................................................85 Chapter 13 Canada .........................................................................................................89 Chapter 14 Denmark ....................................................................................................103 Chapter 15 the European Commission .........................................................................119 Chapter 16 Finland .......................................................................................................131 Chapter 17 Germany ....................................................................................................143 Chapter 18 Greece .......................................................................................................155 Chapter 19 Ireland ........................................................................................................163 Chapter 20 Italy ............................................................................................................173 Chapter 21 Japan ..........................................................................................................187 Chapter 22 Republic of Korea ......................................................................................197 Chapter 23 Mexico ......................................................................................................201 Chapter
Recommended publications
  • Ministry of New and Renewable Energy Government of India Wind Energy Division
    Ministry of New and Renewable Energy Government of India Wind Energy Division Wind Turbine Models included in the RLMM after declaration of new procedure (i.e 01 November 2018) As on 28.09.2020 S. No Manufacturing Company with contact Company Incorporation Details License/ Model Name Rotor Dia (RD) Hub Height Tower Type Capacity (kW) Type Certificate Manufacturing system Certificate / ISO Certificate details Collaboration/ (m) (HH) (m) Joint Venture Date Document According to Any Outstanding Validity till Document According to Validity till Document Issues 1 M/s. Regen Powertech Private Limited 27-12-2006 Regen CoI VENSYS VENSYS 116 116.1 90 Tubular Steel 2000 ($$) S-Class/Turbulance No 07-11-2021 Vensys 116 TC ISO: 9001 : 2015 29-04-2023 Regen ISO Sivanandam, 1st Floor, New No. 1, Pulla Energy AG, B-Class (GL Avenue, Shenoy Nagar, Chennai, Tamil Nadu - Germany 2010/IEC 61400- 600030 1:1999) Phone:044-42966200 2 Fax :044-42966298/99 VENSYS 87 86.6 85 Tubular Steel 1500 IEC Class III B (GL No 26-01-2022 Vensys 87 TC Email: [email protected] 2010) 3 M/s Envision Wind Power Technologies India 12-07-2016 Envision CoI Envision EN 115 2.3 MW 115.9 90.32 Tubular Steel 2300 IEC Class III A No 09-11-2021 Envision EN 115 ISO: 9001: 2015 01-05-2021 Envision ISO (Pvt.) Ltd., Energy(JIANG IEC IIIA (GL/ IEC 61400- TC Level 9, Platina, C-59, G Block, BKC, Bandra SU) Co., Ltd., 22:2010) East, Mumbai-400051 China Tel: 022-67000988 / 080-61296200, Fax: 022-67000600 4 Envision EN2.5-131 131 100 / 120 Tubular Steel 2500 IEC 61400-22:2010 No 11-07-2023 Envision EN 131 Email: [email protected], 50Hz IEC S HH120 [email protected] TC 5 M/s.
    [Show full text]
  • Suzlon Signs Binding Agreement with Centerbridge Partners LP for 100% Sale of Senvion SE
    For Immediate Release 22 January 2015 Suzlon signs binding agreement with Centerbridge Partners LP for 100% sale of Senvion SE Equity value of EUR 1 Billion (approx Rs. 7200 Crs) for 100% stake sale in an all cash deal and Earn Out of EUR 50 Million (approx Rs. 360 Crs) Senvion to give licence to Suzlon for off-shore technology for the Indian market Suzlon to give license to Senvion for S111- 2.1 MW technology for USA market Sale Proceeds to be utilised towards debt reduction and business growth in the key markets like India, USA and other Emerging markets Pune, India: Suzlon Group today signed a binding agreement with Centerbridge Partners LP, USA to sell 100% stake in Senvion SE, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Suzlon Group. The deal is valued at EUR 1 billion (approx Rs. 7200 Crs) equity value in an all cash transaction and future earn out of upto an additional EUR 50 million (approx Rs 360crs). The transaction is subject to Regulatory and other customary closing conditions. Senvion to give Suzlon license for off-shore technologies for the Indian market. Suzlon to give Senvion the S111-2.1 MW license for the USA market. The 100% stake sale of Senvion SE is in line with Suzlon‘s strategy to reduce the debt and focus on the home market and high growth market like USA and emerging markets like China, Brazil, South Africa, Turkey and Mexico. The transaction is expected to be closed before the end of the current financial year. Mr Tulsi Tanti, Chairman, Suzlon Group said, “We are pleased to announce this development which is in line with our strategic initiative to strengthen our Balance Sheet.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of International Experience with Policies to Promote Wind Power Industry Development
    A Review of International Experience with Policies to Promote Wind Power Industry Development FINAL REPORT Prepared by: Joanna Lewis, Consultant to the Center for Resource Solutions Ryan Wiser, Consultant to the Center for Resource Solutions Prepared for: Energy Foundation China Sustainable Energy Program March 10, 2005 Table of Contents Executive Summary...................................................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction........................................................................................................................... 9 2. Strategies for Localization ................................................................................................. 11 2.1. Models for wind turbine manufacturing ........................................................................ 11 2.2. Models for technology acquisition: purchasing versus internal development............... 11 2.3. Incentives for technology transfers................................................................................ 12 2.4. Implications.................................................................................................................... 12 3. Potential Benefits of Localization...................................................................................... 14 3.1. Domestic economic development and employment ...................................................... 14 3.2. International exports.....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • News Release No. 8/2011 from Vestas Northern Europe
    News release No. 8/2011 from Vestas Northern Europe Malmö, 19 October 2011 News release No. 8/2011 Page 1 of 2 Vestas continues expansion in Finland Vestas has received the second order from TuuliWatti Oy for delivery of 8 units of the V112-3.0 MW wind turbine for the Ii-Olhava project. The first order for 6 similar units was announced on 7 June 2011. The new order has a total capacity of 24 MW and the turbines will be installed in Olhava, Finland. Delivery of the turbines is scheduled to be completed by the end of 2012. The contract includes supply, installation and commissioning of the turbines and a 6-year full-scope active output management agreement. “We are very pleased that TuuliWatti Oy has shown confidence in the Vestas product and chooses Vestas as a partner for their wind power plant expansions. This second project in Finland is an important step for us to build a leading position in the Finnish market for renewable energy,” says Klaus Steen Mortensen, President of Vestas Northern Europe. Finland has recently taken steps to enhance the development of renewable energy. A feed-in tariff system for renewable energy was launched earlier this year, and Finland has a renewable energy target to produce 6 TWh from wind power by 2020. This requires a capacity of approx 2,500 MW. “TuuliWatti Oy has proven that they are a frontrunner in developing wind power in Finland and their partnership and trust means a lot to us. We look forward to a continued close cooperation on the coming project.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning for Wind Energy
    Planning for Wind Energy Suzanne Rynne, AICP , Larry Flowers, Eric Lantz, and Erica Heller, AICP , Editors American Planning Association Planning Advisory Service Report Number 566 Planning for Wind Energy is the result of a collaborative part- search intern at APA; Kirstin Kuenzi is a research intern at nership among the American Planning Association (APA), APA; Joe MacDonald, aicp, was program development se- the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), the nior associate at APA; Ann F. Dillemuth, aicp, is a research American Wind Energy Association (AWEA), and Clarion associate and co-editor of PAS Memo at APA. Associates. Funding was provided by the U.S. Department The authors thank the many other individuals who con- of Energy under award number DE-EE0000717, as part of tributed to or supported this project, particularly the plan- the 20% Wind by 2030: Overcoming the Challenges funding ners, elected officials, and other stakeholders from case- opportunity. study communities who participated in interviews, shared The report was developed under the auspices of the Green documents and images, and reviewed drafts of the case Communities Research Center, one of APA’s National studies. Special thanks also goes to the project partners Centers for Planning. The Center engages in research, policy, who reviewed the entire report and provided thoughtful outreach, and education that advance green communities edits and comments, as well as the scoping symposium through planning. For more information, visit www.plan- participants who worked with APA and project partners to ning.org/nationalcenters/green/index.htm. APA’s National develop the outline for the report: James Andrews, utilities Centers for Planning conduct policy-relevant research and specialist at the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission; education involving community health, natural and man- Jennifer Banks, offshore wind and siting specialist at AWEA; made hazards, and green communities.
    [Show full text]
  • 3,549 Mw Yt 0.810 Mw
    Canada Wind Farms As of October 2010 Current Installed Capacity: 3,549 MW YT 0.810 MW NL 54.7 MW BC 656 MW 103.5 MW AB 104 MW SK MB 171.2 MW ON 663 MW 1,298 MW QC PE 164 MW NB 195 MW NS Courtesy of 138 MW Alberta COMPLETED WIND FARMS Installed Capacity Project Project Power Turbine # Project Name (in MW) Developer Owner Purchaser Manufacturer Year Online 1 Cardston Municipal District Magrath 30 Suncor, Enbridge, EHN Suncor, Enbridge, EHN Suncor, Enbridge, EHN GE Wind 2004 McBride Lake 75.24 Enmax, TransAlta Wind Enmax, TransAlta Wind Enmax, TransAlta Wind Vestas 2007 McBride Lake East 0.6 TransAlta Wind TransAlta Wind TransAlta Wind Vestas 2001 Soderglen Wind Farm 70.5 Nexen/Canadian Hydro Nexen/Canadian Hydro Nexen/Canadian Hydro GE 2006 Developers, Inc. Developers, Inc. Developers, Inc. Waterton Wind Turbines 3.78 TransAlta Wind TransAlta Wind TransAlta Wind Vestas 1998 2 Pincher Municipal District Castle River Wind Farm 0.6 TransAlta Wind TransAlta Wind TransAlta Wind Vestas 1997 Castle River Wind Farm 9.9 TransAlta Wind TransAlta Wind TransAlta Wind Vestas 2000 Castle River Wind Farm 29.04 TransAlta Wind TransAlta Wind TransAlta Wind Vestas 2001 Cowley Ridge 21.4 Canadian Hydro Canadian Hydro Canadian Hydro Kenetech 1993/1994 Developers, Inc. Developers, Inc. Developers, Inc. Cowley Ridge North Wind Farm 19.5 Canadian Hydro Canadian Hydro Canadian Hydro Nordex 2001 Developers, Inc. Developers, Inc. Developers, Inc. Lundbreck 0.6 Lundbreck Developments Lundbreck Developments Lundbreck Developments Enercon 2001 Joint Venture A Joint Venture A Joint Venture A Kettles Hill Phase I 9 Enmax Enmax Enmax Vestas 2006 Kettles Hill Phase II 54 Enmax Enmax Enmax Vestas 2007 Old Man River Project 3.6 Alberta Wind Energy Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 6.1: List of Cumulative Projects
    Appendix 6.1 Long list of cumulative projects considered within the EIA Report GoBe Consultants Ltd. March 2018 List of Cumulative Appendix 6.1 Projects 1 Firth of Forth and Tay Offshore Wind Farms Inch Cape Offshore Wind (as described in the decision notices of Scottish Ministers dated 10th October 2014 and plans referred to therein and as proposed in the Scoping Report submitted to MS-LOT in May 2017) The consented project will consist of up to 110 wind turbines and generating up to 784 MW situated East of the Angus Coast in the outer Forth and Tay. It is being developed by Inch Cape Offshore Windfarm Ltd (ICOL). This project was consented in 2014, but was subject to Judicial Review proceedings (see section 1.4.1.1 of the EIA Report for full details) which resulted in significant delays. Subsequently ICOL requested a Scoping Opinion for a new application comprising of 75 turbines with a generating capacity of 784 MW. Project details can be accessed at: http://www.inchcapewind.com/home Seagreen Alpha and Bravo (as described in the decision notices of Scottish Ministers dated 10th October 2014 and plans referred to therein and as Proposed in the Scoping Report submitted to MS-LOT in May 2017) The consents for this project includes two offshore wind farms, being developed by Seagreen Wind Energy Limited (SWEL), each consisting of up to 75 wind turbines and generating up to 525 MW. This project was consented in 2014, but was subject to Judicial Review proceedings (see section 1.4.1.1 of the EIA Report for full details) which resulted in significant delays.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterisation of Intra-Hourly Wind Power Ramps at the Wind Farm Scale and Associated Processes
    Wind Energ. Sci., 6, 131–147, 2021 https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-6-131-2021 © Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Characterisation of intra-hourly wind power ramps at the wind farm scale and associated processes Mathieu Pichault1, Claire Vincent2, Grant Skidmore1, and Jason Monty1 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia 2School of Earth Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia Correspondence: Mathieu Pichault ([email protected]) Received: 12 May 2020 – Discussion started: 5 June 2020 Revised: 15 September 2020 – Accepted: 8 December 2020 – Published: 19 January 2021 Abstract. One of the main factors contributing to wind power forecast inaccuracies is the occurrence of large changes in wind power output over a short amount of time, also called “ramp events”. In this paper, we assess the behaviour and causality of 1183 ramp events at a large wind farm site located in Victoria (southeast Australia). We address the relative importance of primary engineering and meteorological processes inducing ramps through an automatic ramp categorisation scheme. Ramp features such as ramp amplitude, shape, diurnal cycle and seasonality are further discussed, and several case studies are presented. It is shown that ramps at the study site are mostly associated with frontal activity (46 %) and that wind power fluctuations tend to plateau before and after the ramps. The research further demonstrates the wide range of temporal scales and behaviours inherent to intra-hourly wind power ramps at the wind farm scale. 1 Introduction hourly) ramp forecasts (Zhang et al., 2017; Cui et al., 2015; Gallego et al., 2015a).
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Power in Finland up to the Year 2025
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Energy Policy 33 (2005) 1930–1947 Wind power in Finland up to the year 2025—‘soft’ scenarios based on expert views Vilja Varhoa,*, Petri Tapiob a Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, P.O. Box 27, University of Helsinki, Fin-00014 Helsinki, Finland b Finland Futures Research Centre, Korkeavuorenkatu 25 A 6, Fin-00130 Helsinki, Finland Abstract In this article we present a method of constructing ‘soft’ scenarios applied to the wind power development in Finland up to the year 2025. We asked 14 experts to describe probable and preferable futures using a quantitative questionnaire and qualitative interviews. Wind power production grows in all scenarios but there were differences in the order of magnitude of 10. The growth rate of electricity consumption slows down in all scenarios. Qualitative arguments varied even within clusters, with wind power policy emerging as the main dividing factor. The differences revealed diverse values and political objectives, as well as great uncertainties in assumptions about future developments. These influence wind power policy and were also believed to have contributed to the slow development of wind power in Finland. Re-thinking of the Finnish wind power policy is recommended. The ‘soft’ scenario method is considered valuable in finding diverse views, constructing transparent scenarios and assisting energy policy making. r 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Keywords: Wind power; Scenario; Expert interview 1. Introduction This has inspired Finnish policy makers and Finnish industries that produce components and materials for Wind power made a remarkable entry to the energy the wind turbines. So far, the growth of domestic sector during the 1990s.
    [Show full text]
  • Ge Renewable Energy News
    Ge Renewable Energy News How dihedral is Barton when recriminative and round-table Shelden yipped some isoantigens? Yves remains deleterious: she reburies her authenticateevertor skite tooso convincingly. aslant? Substituent Byron somersault creamily while Tann always burgles his mallemucks attirings judicially, he His job creation, applications and additive manufacturing process the website in order to the wind farm in hillsdale county than energy news. Before other renewable energy news gathering as wind turbines. Mw version of renewable energy limited, located near future? GE Renewable Energy REVE News stop the wind sector in. GE annual report shows struggles and successes quantifies. The recent policy-flow that its US competitor GEhas been selected for. Additive is pushing for new york, and cooled down. GE Renewable Energy Latest Breaking News Pictures Videos and Special Reports from The Economic Times GE Renewable Energy Blogs Comments and. Missouri plant has occurred, the virus continues to determine the longest running republican senator in. GE Renewable Energy International Hydropower Association. The state by late january wind power grid businesses to putting our sites. Cookie and new nrc chair in the end, or dismiss a hub for ireland at factories and water challenges for? DOE taps GE Renewable Energy for 3-D printed wind turbine. It comes to Secondary Sources Company's Annual reports press Releases. The new offshore wind turbine Haliade-X unveiled in this wind energy news direct by GE in March 201 is 260 meters high from destination to blade tipsand its. GE Renewable Energy said Monday it was exempt the largest wind turbine rotor test rig of its rich in Wieringerwerf the.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Minute Wind Forecasting Challenge: Exelon and GE's Predix
    The 5 Minute Wind Forecasting Challenge: Exelon and GE’s Predix At a Glance A move toward digital industrial transformation As a leading utility company with more than $31 billion in global Renewable Energy revenues in 2016 and over 32 gigawatts (GW) of total generation, Exelon knows the importance of taking a strategic view of digital transformation across its lines of business. Challenge Exelon sought to optimize wind power forecasting by predicting wind Exelon was developing strategies for managing its various generation ramp events, enabling the company to dispatch power that could not be assets across nuclear, fossil fuels, wind, hydro, and solar power as well monetized otherwise. The result is higher revenue for Exelon’s large-scale wind farm operations. as determining how it would leverage the enormous amount of data those assets would generate going forward. Solution GE and Exelon teams co-innovated to build a solution on Predix that In evaluating its strategies, the company reviewed its current increases wind forecasting accuracy by designing a new physical and statistical wind power forecast model that uses turbine data on-premises OT/IT infrastructure across its entire energy portfolio. together with weather forecasting data. This model now represents Business leaders looked at the system administration challenges the industry-leading forecasting solution (as measured by a substantial and costs they would face to maintain the current infrastructure, let reduction in under-forecasting). alone use it as a basis for driving new revenue across its business Results units. This assessment made digital transformation an even greater Exelon’s wind forecasting prediction accuracy grew signifcantly, enabling imperative, and inspired discussions about how Exelon could leverage higher energy capture valued at $2 million per year.
    [Show full text]
  • Whitelee Wind Farm, Scotland 2010 – to Date
    CASE STUDY : Ref 292 Whitelee Wind Farm, Scotland 2010 – to date A Tensar TriAx® Mechanically Stabilised Layer is combined with site-won stone to form new access roads BENEFITS TO CLIENT A design and supply solution for stabilised access over difficult ground conditions using minimal quantities of site- won fill. THE PROBLEM There was a requirement to carry heavy loads over low bearing capacity soil conditions including peat bog for access roads and platforms in the development of a substantial extension to an existing wind farm. The access roads needed to support the trafficking from construction vehicles as well as from the turbine delivery vehicles and cranes. THE SOLUTION The use of single and multiple layers of Tensar TriAx® geogrids with site-won stone combined to form new access roads and to improve existing forestry roads to support increased trafficking. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Whitelee Wind Farm is Europe’s largest wind farm and is located on Eaglesham Moor just 20 minutes from central Glasgow. The wind farm has 140 turbines which can generate 322MW of electricity, enough to power 180,000 homes. Over the past ten years, Whitelee has been carefully planned and designed to work in harmony with the existing environment and after three years of construction the wind farm is fully operational and producing clean, green energy. In December 2010, Tensar were fortunate enough to be given the contract to design and supply TriAx® geogrids for the access roads for the main contractor Roadbridge/Sisk JV on this project at Whitelee wind farm phase 2. The second phase will be home to a further 36 turbines.
    [Show full text]