DOCSLIB.ORG

The World Bank Asia Sustainable and Alternative Energy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The World Bank Asia Sustainable and Alternative Energy The World Bank Asia Sustainable and Alternative Energy Program China Meeting the Challenges of Offshore and Large-Scale Wind Power: Regulatory Review of Offshore Wind in Five European Countries China: Meeting the Challenges of Offshore and Large-Scale Wind Power Joint publication of the National Energy Administration of China and the World Bank Supported by the Australian Agency for International Development and ASTAE Copyright © 2010 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank Group 1818 H Street, NW Washington, DC 20433, USA All rights reserved First printing: May 2010 Manufactured in the United States of America. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Australian Agency for International Development. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this report are entirely those of the authors and should not be attributed in any manner to the World Bank, or its affiliated organizations, or to members of its board of executive directors or the countries they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility whatsoever for any consequence of their use. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this volume do not imply on the part of the World Bank Group any judgment on the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Contents Preface ........................................................................................................................................vii Acknowledgments ....................................................................................................................viii Glossary .......................................................................................................................................ix Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................xi 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................1 2. Market Development .............................................................................................................3 The European Union .................................................................................................................................................7 Denmark ...................................................................................................................................................................8 Germany .................................................................................................................................................................11 The Netherlands .....................................................................................................................................................13 Spain .......................................................................................................................................................................20 The United Kingdom ...............................................................................................................................................21 Comparative Summary ...........................................................................................................................................23 3. Targets and Incentives .........................................................................................................25 The European Union ...............................................................................................................................................25 Denmark .................................................................................................................................................................28 Germany .................................................................................................................................................................31 The Netherlands .....................................................................................................................................................34 Spain .......................................................................................................................................................................35 The United Kingdom ...............................................................................................................................................37 Comparative Summary ...........................................................................................................................................40 4. Regulatory Framework ........................................................................................................41 Key Applicable Laws and Conventions ...................................................................................................................41 The European Union ........................................................................................................................................42 Denmark ..........................................................................................................................................................42 Germany ..........................................................................................................................................................42 The Netherlands ..............................................................................................................................................44 Spain ...............................................................................................................................................................44 The United Kingdom .......................................................................................................................................44 Concession Award and Seabed Ownership ...........................................................................................................45 Denmark ..........................................................................................................................................................45 Germany ..........................................................................................................................................................45 The Netherlands ..............................................................................................................................................46 Spain ...............................................................................................................................................................47 The United Kingdom .......................................................................................................................................47 Licensing and Consenting ......................................................................................................................................48 Denmark ..........................................................................................................................................................48 Germany ..........................................................................................................................................................48 The Netherlands ..............................................................................................................................................49 Spain ...............................................................................................................................................................49 The United Kingdom .......................................................................................................................................50 iii iv Contents Government Bodies ................................................................................................................................................51 The European Union ........................................................................................................................................51 Denmark ..........................................................................................................................................................51 Germany ..........................................................................................................................................................52 The Netherlands ..............................................................................................................................................52 Spain ...............................................................................................................................................................54 The United Kingdom .......................................................................................................................................54 Grid Access ............................................................................................................................................................56 The European Union ........................................................................................................................................56 Denmark ..........................................................................................................................................................56
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Deutsche Windtechnik Achieves a New Milestone: Maintenance for Siemens SWT-3.6 at the Riffgat Offshore Wind Farm Press Release
    Press Release Contact Karola Kletzsch Corporate Communications Telephone +49 421 69 105 330 Mobile +49 172 263 77 89 E-Mail k.kletzsch@ deutsche-windtechnik.com Bremen 25.04.2019 Page 1/3 Deutsche Windtechnik achieves a new milestone: Maintenance for Siemens SWT-3.6 at the Riffgat offshore wind farm Deutsche Windtechnik has been awarded the contract to provide maintenance for 30 Siemens SWT-3.6-120 wind turbines at the Riffgat offshore wind farm as part of an EU tender procedure that was initiated by EWE Offshore Service und Solutions GmbH (EWE OSS). The contract begins in June 2019. The two companies have been working together closely for more than two years at the offshore wind farm alpha ventus, and their cooperation will now continue at the Riffgat offshore wind farm as a result of the EU tender. The contract includes basic maintenance, troubleshooting, remote fault elimination, spare parts management, maintenance of safety equipment and testing of electrical equipment in accordance with DGUV V3. This makes Deutsche Windtechnik, which operates independently from manufacturers, the first ISP (Independent Service Provider) in the world to provide maintenance for Siemens SWT-3.6 turbines. "We are very pleased to be able to provide the service for this great system technology. Utilising synergies and planning for the long-term enable operators to save significant costs with us. This also applies to the Borkum Cluster that EWE OSS is planning. Deutsche Windtechnik is an optimal service partner that delivers customised added value from Borkum/Emden to customers who are active in the Borkum Cluster," said Jens Landwehr, Managing Director of Deutsche Windtechnik Offshore und Consulting GmbH.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the First Three Quarters of 2014
    REPORT ON THE FIRST THREE QUARTERS OF 2014 • Operating result of €2.9 billion as forecast • Net fi nancial debt down by €2.3 billion • Outlook for 2014 confi rmed • RWE plants pre-qualify for UK capacity market AT A GLANCE RWE Group – key figures1 Jan – Sep Jan – Sep + /− Jan – Dec 2014 2013 % 2013 Electricity production billion kWh 151.2 160.7 − 5.9 218.2 External electricity sales volume billion kWh 191.7 200.0 − 4.2 270.9 External gas sales volume billion kWh 184.6 228.7 − 19.3 320.7 External revenue € million 35,288 38,698 − 8.8 52,425 EBITDA € million 4,700 6,048 − 22.3 7,904 Operating result € million 2,908 4,190 − 30.6 5,369 Income from continuing operations before tax € million 1,470 1,251 17.5 − 2,016 Net income € million 994 609 63.2 − 2,757 Recurrent net income € million 763 1,915 − 60.2 2,314 Earnings per share € 1.62 0.99 63.6 − 4.49 Recurrent net income per share € 1.24 3.12 − 60.3 3.76 Cash flows from operating activities of continuing operations € million 4,759 4,503 5.7 4,803 Capital expenditure € million 2,284 2,526 − 9.6 3,978 Property, plant and equipment and intangible assets € million 2,197 2,458 − 10.6 3,848 Financial assets € million 87 68 27.9 130 Free cash flow € million 2,562 2,045 25.3 960 30 Sep 2014 31 Dec 2013 Net debt € million 30,709 30,727 − 0.1 Workforce2 60,439 64,896 − 6.9 1 See commentary on reporting on page 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Windfarm OWEZ on the Local Macrobenthos Communiy
    Impact of windfarm OWEZ on the local macrobenthos community report OWEZ_R_261_T1_20090305 R. Daan, M. Mulder, M.J.N. Bergman Koninklijk Nederlands Instituut voor Zeeonderzoek (NIOZ) This project is carried out on behalf of NoordzeeWind, through a sub contract with Wageningen-Imares Contents Summary and conclusions 3 Introduction 5 Methods 6 Results boxcore 11 Results Triple-D dredge 13 Discussion 16 References 19 Tables 21 Figures 33 Appendix 1 44 Appendix 2 69 Appendix 3 72 Photo’s by Hendricus Kooi 2 Summary and conclusions In this report the results are presented of a study on possible short‐term effects of the construction of Offshore Windfarm Egmond aan Zee (OWEZ) on the composition of the local benthic fauna living in or on top of the sediment. The study is based on a benthic survey carried out in spring 2007, a few months after completion of the wind farm. During this survey the benthic fauna was sampled within the wind farm itself and in 6 reference areas lying north and south of it. Sampling took place mainly with a boxcorer, but there was also a limited programme with a Triple‐D dredge. The occurrence of possible effects was analyzed by comparing characteristics of the macrobenthos within the wind farm with those in the reference areas. A quantitative comparison of these characteristics with those observed during a baseline survey carried out 4 years before was hampered by a difference in sampling design and methodological differences. The conclusions of this study can be summarized as follows: 1. Based on the Bray‐Curtis index for percentage similarity there appeared to be great to very great similarity in the fauna composition of OWEZ and the majority of the reference areas.
    [Show full text]
  • New & Renewable Energy
    Seoul - December 6, 2010 Wind Energy in the Netherlands . History . Overview . Offshore . Examples . Conclusions 2 History of wind energy in the Netherlands A windmill is a machine which converts the energy of the wind into rotational motion by means of adjustable vanes called sails Autonomous development in Europe that started in the 11th century Development in the Netherlands leading to a large variety of mills First wind mills for drainage in 1414 Windmills for energy to saw mills, to mills used for crushing seeds, grains, etc. Cheap energy was a major contributing factor to the Golden Age (17th century) of the Netherlands Invention of steam engine (1775) signaled the end of wind mills 1,000 wind mills left out of a total of more than 10,000 3 Kinderdijk 4 Recent history of wind energy in the Netherlands A windmill is a machine which converts the energy of the wind into rotational motion by means of adjustable blades made of synthetic material Renewed interest in wind energy resulted from the oil crisis in 1973 Dutch government support from 1976 Present capacity 2,229MW Government objective to have 6GW installed by 2020 5 Overview wind energy sector in the Netherlands (1) Turbine manufacturers & developers: . Lagerwey in difficulties, restarted as Zephyros, acquired by Hara Kosan, now acquired by STX . Nedwind acquired by NEG-Micon, which in turn acquired by Vestas . Windmaster discontinued . Darwind acquired by XEMC (China) . EWT originally using Lagerwey technology, now developing its own technology . 2B Energy proto type for +6MW offshore turbine 6 Overview wind energy sector in the Netherlands (2) Marine engineering Construction & dredging Electrical design & consulting Building of specialized vessels 7 Overview wind energy sector in the Netherlands (3) Blade manufacturing & testing .
    [Show full text]
  • The Definitive Who's Who of the Wind Energy Industry
    2014 Top 100 Power People 1 100 TOP 100 POWER PEOPLE 2014 The definitive who’s who of the wind energy industry © A Word About Wind, 2014 2014 Top 100 Power People Contents 2 CONTENTS Editorial: Introducing the Top 100 Power People 3 Compiling the top 100: Advisory panel and methodology 4 Profiles: Numbers 100 to 11 6 Q&A: Rory O’Connor, Managing Director, BlackRock 15 Q&A: David Jones, Managing Director, Allianz Capital Partners 19 Q&A: Torben Möger Pedersen, CEO, PensionDanmark 23 Top ten profiles:The most influential people in global wind 25 Top 100 list: The full Top 100 Power People for 2014 28 Next year: Key dates for A Word About Wind in 2015 30 Networking at A Word About Wind Quarterly Drinks © A Word About Wind, 2014 2014 Top 100 Power People Editorial 3 EDITORIAL elcome to our third annual Top from the six last year, but shows there W100 Power People report. is still plenty that wind can do to attract and retain women in senior roles. When we took on the challenge back in 2012 of identifying and assessing the Wind likes to think of itself as a pro- key people working in wind, it was a gressive industry, and in many ways it timely task. The industry was starting to is. But let’s not be blind to the ways in move out of established pockets in Eu- which it continues to operate like many rope, North America and Asia, and into other sectors, with males continuing to by Richard Heap, emerging markets around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 6.1: List of Cumulative Projects
    Appendix 6.1 Long list of cumulative projects considered within the EIA Report GoBe Consultants Ltd. March 2018 List of Cumulative Appendix 6.1 Projects 1 Firth of Forth and Tay Offshore Wind Farms Inch Cape Offshore Wind (as described in the decision notices of Scottish Ministers dated 10th October 2014 and plans referred to therein and as proposed in the Scoping Report submitted to MS-LOT in May 2017) The consented project will consist of up to 110 wind turbines and generating up to 784 MW situated East of the Angus Coast in the outer Forth and Tay. It is being developed by Inch Cape Offshore Windfarm Ltd (ICOL). This project was consented in 2014, but was subject to Judicial Review proceedings (see section 1.4.1.1 of the EIA Report for full details) which resulted in significant delays. Subsequently ICOL requested a Scoping Opinion for a new application comprising of 75 turbines with a generating capacity of 784 MW. Project details can be accessed at: http://www.inchcapewind.com/home Seagreen Alpha and Bravo (as described in the decision notices of Scottish Ministers dated 10th October 2014 and plans referred to therein and as Proposed in the Scoping Report submitted to MS-LOT in May 2017) The consents for this project includes two offshore wind farms, being developed by Seagreen Wind Energy Limited (SWEL), each consisting of up to 75 wind turbines and generating up to 525 MW. This project was consented in 2014, but was subject to Judicial Review proceedings (see section 1.4.1.1 of the EIA Report for full details) which resulted in significant delays.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Responsibility. Report 2013 XXXXX U1 Our Responsibility
    Our Responsibility. Report 2013 XXXXX U1 Our Responsibility. Report 2013 KAPITEL HEAD EARNING TRUST. Our Responsibility. Report 2013 CONTENT Interview with Peter Terium 1 About this Report 66 Report Profile 66 Our Greatest Challenges 3 Independent Assurance Report 68 Corporate Challenges 3 Index According to GRI Environmental Challenges 6 (Global Reporting Initiative) 71 Social Challenges 13 GRI Level Check Statement 73 Governance Challenges 16 UN Global Compact Progress Report 2013 74 CR Strategy and Management 20 Group Portrait 20 Key Figures at a Glance 76 Value Chain: activities and challenges 23 Our Regions 26 Contact and Imprint 79 Corporate Responsibility Strategy 33 Materiality Analysis 2013 35 Our Company 80 CR Management 37 Additional Management Systems 38 Stakeholder Dialogue 41 CR Programme 43 Our CR Areas for Action 46 Climate Protection 46 Energy Efficiency 48 Biodiversity/Environmental Protection 50 Community Engagement 52 Customer Trust 54 Employees 56 Supply Chain 58 Occupational Safety and Healthcare Management 60 Security of Supply 62 Innovation 64 Our Responsibility. Report 2013 Interview with Peter Terium 1 INTERVIEW WITH PETER TERIUM CEO of RWE AG Mr Terium, the restructuring of the European energy RWE wants to be a partner for the energy transition. system is moving forward. Like any major process of But do our citizens want RWE to be a partner? change, there will be winners and losers. Which side We have a lot of supporters. More than 23 mil- will RWE be on at the end of the journey? lion people put their trust in RWE’s expertise It would not be good if the energy transition every day: our customers.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect Studies Offshore Wind Egmond Aan Zee: Cumulative Effects on Seabirds
    Effect studies Offshore Wind Egmond aan Zee: cumulative effects on seabirds A modelling approach to estimate effects on population levels in seabirds M.J.M. Poot P.W. van Horssen M.P. Collier R. Lensink S. Dirksen Consultants for environment & ecology Effect studies Offshore Wind Egmond aan Zee: cumulative effects on seabirds A modelling approach to estimate effects on population levels in seabirds M.J.M. Poot P.W. van Horssen M.P. Collier R. Lensink S. Dirksen commissioned by: Noordzeewind date: 18 November 2011 report nr: 11-026 OWEZ_R_212_T1_20111118_Cumulative effects Status: Final report Report nr.: 11-026 OWEZ_R_212_T1_20111118_Cumulative effects Date of publication: 18 November 2011 Title: Effect studies Offshore Wind Egmond aan Zee: cumulative effects on seabirds Subtitle: A modelling approach to estimate effects on population levels in seabirds Authors: drs. M.J.M. Poot drs. P.W. van Horssen msc. M.P. Collier drs. ing. R. Lensink drs. S. Dirksen Number of pages incl. appendices: 247 Project nr: 06-466 Project manager: drs. M.J.M. Poot Name & address client: Noordzeewind, ing. H.J. Kouwenhoven 2e Havenstraat 5B 1976 CE IJmuiden Reference client: Framework agreement for the provision of “MEP services” 30 May 2005 Signed for publication: Team manager bird ecology department Bureau Waardenburg bv drs. T.J. Boudewijn Initials: Bureau Waardenburg bv is not liable for any resulting damage, nor for damage which results from applying results of work or other data obtained from Bureau Waardenburg bv; client indemnifies Bureau Waardenburg bv against third-party liability in relation to these applications. © Bureau Waardenburg bv / Noordzeewind This report is produced at the request of the client mentioned above and is his property.
    [Show full text]
  • Repower Systems AG Corporate Presentation
    REpower Systems AG Corporate Presentation September 2009 “Of all the forces of nature, I should think the wind contains the largest amount of motive power – that is, power to move things.” …… Abraham Lincoln (1859) “We will harness the sun and the winds and the soil to fuel our cars and run our factories […] All this we can do. And all this we will do.” …… Barack Obama (2009) 2 There are four good reasons for the growth of renewable energies. Scarce resources Import dependency RENEWABLERENEWABLE Climatic change ENERGIESENERGIES Growing energy demand 3 Agenda At a glance Market Company Technology Projects Financials & Outlook 4 Fiscal year 2008/09 at a glance. ExpansionExpansion InnovationsInnovations OffshoreOffshore milestonesmilestones ofof capacitiescapacities StartStart ofof 5M5M serialserial ProductProduct launchlaunch ofof upgradedupgraded ConstructionConstruction startstart ofof newnew productionproduction inin thethe newnew offshoreoffshore turbineturbine REpowerREpower R&DR&D CentreCentre offshoreoffshore manufacturingmanufacturing andand 6M6M (Osterrönfeld, Germany) (Osterrönfeld, Germany) logisticslogistics centrecentre ProductProduct launchlaunch ofof newnew StartStart ofof rotorrotor bladeblade CompletionCompletion ofof firstfirst fullyfully onshoreonshore turbineturbine REpowerREpower productionproduction inin thethe newnew rotorrotor approvedapproved BelgiumBelgium offshoreoffshore 3.XM3.XM bladeblade facilityfacility windwind farmfarm „Thornton„Thornton Bank“Bank“ StartStart ofof serialserial productionproduction ofof FrameworkFramework
    [Show full text]
  • Offshore Wind in Europe Key Trends and Statistics 2020
    Offshore Wind in Europe Key trends and statistics 2020 Offshore Wind in Europe Key trends and statistics 2020 Published in February 2021 windeurope.org This report summarises construction and financing activity in European offshore wind farms from 1 January to 31 December 2020. WindEurope regularly surveys the industry to determine the level of installations of foundations and turbines, and the subsequent dispatch of first power to the grid. The data includes demonstration sites and factors in decommissioning where it has occurred. Annual installations are expressed in gross figures while cumulative capacity represents net installations per site and country. Rounding of figures is at the discretion of the author. DISCLAIMER This publication contains information collected on a regular basis throughout the year and then verified with relevant members of the industry ahead of publication. Neither WindEurope nor its members, nor their related entities are, by means of this publication, rendering professional advice or services. Neither WindEurope nor its members shall be responsible for any loss whatsoever sustained by any person who relies on this publication. TEXT AND ANALYSIS: Lizet Ramírez, WindEurope Daniel Fraile, WindEurope Guy Brindley, WindEurope EDITOR: Rory O’Sullivan, WindEurope DESIGN: Laia Miró, WindEurope Lin Van de Velde, Drukvorm FINANCE DATA: Clean Energy Pipeline and IJ Global All currency conversions made at EUR/ GBP 0.8897 and EUR/USD 1.1422. Figures include estimates for undisclosed values. PHOTO COVER: Kriegers Flak
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Monitoring and Mitigation Policies and Practices at Offshore Wind Installations in the United States and Europe
    Ecological Monitoring and Mitigation Policies and Practices at Offshore Wind Installations in the United States and Europe August 2020 Michael C. Allen, Ph.D., Postdoctoral Research Associate, Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Natural Resources, Rutgers University, Matthew Campo, Senior Research Specialist, Environmental Analysis & Communications Group, Rutgers University Prepared for the New Jersey Climate Change Alliance (https://njadapt.rutgers.edu/). Working Group Members: John Cecil, New Jersey Audubon Tim Dillingham, American Littoral Society Patty Doerr, The Nature Conservancy of New Jersey Russell Furnari, PSEG Kevin Hassell, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Anthony MacDonald, Urban Coast Institute at Monmouth University Martha Maxwell-Doyle, Barnegat Bay Partnership David Mizrahi, Ph.D., New Jersey Audubon Technical Reviews and Acknowledgments Joseph Brodie, Ph.D. Jeanne Herb Marjorie Kaplan, Dr.P.H. Josh Kohut, Ph.D. Richard Lathrop, Ph.D. Julie Lockwood, Ph.D. Douglas Zemeckis, Ph.D. https://doi.org/doi:10.7282/t3-wn1p-cz80 1 ABSTRACT Offshore wind energy is poised to expand dramatically along the eastern United States. However, the promise of sustainable energy also brings potential impacts on marine ecosystems from new turbines and transmission infrastructure. This whitepaper informs government officials, scientists, and stakeholders in New Jersey about the current policies and monitoring methods other jurisdictions use to monitor potential ecological impacts from offshore wind installations. We reviewed policy documents in the eastern U.S. and Europe, reviewed the scientific literature, and conducted stakeholder interviews in Spring 2020. We found: 1. Short-term (3-5 year) project-specific efforts dominate coordinated regional and project life duration ecological monitoring efforts at offshore wind farms in North America and Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Reef Effects of Offshore Wind Farm Strucurse and Potential for Enhancement and Mitigation
    REVIEW OF REEF EFFECTS OF OFFSHORE WIND FARM STRUCTURES AND POTENTIAL FOR ENHANCEMENT AND MITIGATION JANUARY 2008 IN ASSOCIATION WITH Review of the reef effects of offshore wind farm structures and potential for enhancement and mitigation Report to the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform PML Applications Ltd in association with Scottish Association of Marine Sciences (SAMS) Contract No : RFCA/005/00029P This report may be cited as follows: Linley E.A.S., Wilding T.A., Black K., Hawkins A.J.S. and Mangi S. (2007). Review of the reef effects of offshore wind farm structures and their potential for enhancement and mitigation. Report from PML Applications Ltd and the Scottish Association for Marine Science to the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (BERR), Contract No: RFCA/005/0029P Acknowledgements Acknowledgements The Review of Reef Effects of Offshore Wind Farm Structures and Potential for Enhancement and Mitigation was prepared by PML Applications Ltd and the Scottish Association for Marine Science. This project was undertaken as part of the UK Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (BERR) offshore wind energy research programme, and managed on behalf of BERR by Hartley Anderson Ltd. We are particularly indebted to John Hartley and other members of the Research Advisory Group for their advice and guidance throughout the production of this report, and to Keith Hiscock and Antony Jensen who also provided detailed comment on early drafts. Numerous individuals have also contributed their advice, particularly in identifying data resources to assist with the analysis. We are particularly indebted to Angela Wratten, Chris Jenner, Tim Smyth, Mark Trimmer, Francis Bunker, Gero Vella, Robert Thornhill, Julie Drew, Adrian Maddocks, Robert Lillie, Tony Nott, Ben Barton, David Fletcher, John Leballeur, Laurie Ayling and Stephen Lockwood – who in the course of passing on information also contributed their ideas and thoughts.
    [Show full text]