DOCSLIB.ORG

Soraia Ansara Social and Psycho-Political Impacts in The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Soraia Ansara Social and Psycho-Political Impacts in The Journal of Social Science Education ©JSSE 2015 Volume 14, Number 2, Summer 2015 DOI 10.2390/jsse-v14-i2-1428 Soraia Ansara Social and Psycho-political Impacts in the Social Construction of Political Memory of the Brazilian Military Dictatorship This article refers to a research on the political memory of the military dictatorship in Brazil, held in three Brazilian cities (Belo Horizonte, Curitiba and São Paulo) in which we analyzed the social and psychopolitical impacts caused by the dictatorship as well as the redemocratization process in building the political memory of community and union leaders. The study revealed two important legacies that were found in the reports of interviewees: the first one refers to police repression, impunity, and authoritarianism still present in Brazilian society; the second legacy refers to the existence of a political memory built by social movements and communities that care about passing on, to the new generations, the events that occurred during the military dictatorship. Research has clearly shown that there is no single memory but several "underground memories" (Pollak, 1989), built by the popular classes, which contradict the versions disseminated by the official memory and enhance the social movements capacity of action as a strategy of resistance and political struggle of the movements today. To the extent that this fight is assumed by other spheres of Brazilian society it may contribute to memory policies in the fight against forgetting. Keywords: (1994b), three phases: the first from 1964 to 1968, Political memory, authoritarianism, military dictatorship, covering the governments of Castelo Branco and Costa e memory policies Silva; a second phase, between 1969 and 1974 during the government of General Emilio Garrastazu Médici, charac- 1 Introduction terized by a strict political repression and accelerated The Brazilian military dictatorship, with all its repressive industrialization; and a third phase, from 1974 to 1985, apparatus, has left many legacies for future generations, characterized by a period of political opening, including both negative - which remain in Brazilian society as the governments of Ernesto Geisel and João Batista remnants of an authoritarian and repressive society and Figueiredo, which marked the beginning of the demo- represent a setback for the advance of democracy - and cratization of the political system, with the end of positive - stimulating the resistance practices of social bipartisanship and the uprising of strike activities and movements. social movements. The present article refers to part of a research on the However, like other dictatorships in Latin America, the Memory of the military dictatorship and repression in Brazilian dictatorship was characterized by the sup- Brazil in which we seek to analyse the collective memory pression of constitutional rights, intervention in trade that was built from the process of Brazilian rede- unions - by the strict censorship that imposed obstacles mocratization in order to identify what has remained in to free information and limited cultural events, reaching the memory of generations that came after the politicians, artists, publishers, teachers, students, law- repression period, that is, we seek to understand how yers, trade union leaders, intellectuals and religious repression appears in the collective memory of people representtatives - prohibition to any kind of protest or who participate in trade union movements or community social mobilization and a strong political persecution and organizations, therefore having a political engagement. repression to those who stood against the military It is noteworthy that the military dictatorship in Brazil regime. In Brazil, the dictatorship was based on the included the period from 1964 to 1985 and, unlike other National Security Doctrine (Doutrina de Segurança Latin American dictatorships, the Brazilian dictatorship Nacional, DSN) which was not limited to the defence of was not embodied in the figure of a single dictator, but the country in facing a supposed "communist aggression" had alternating military chiefs in control of State and but, as Alves (1984) points out, referred to the "inside power through indirect elections. Thus, the president enemy", in other words, the intent to ensure National was indicated by an Electoral College – and this gave a Security implied the elimination of internal communist democratic mask to the military regime. This sequence of aggression which meant direct repression of organi- military governments had, according to Sandoval zations and social movements and the constant sur- veillance of all institutions and sectors of society. In the Dra. Soraia Ansara is Professor at the Postgraduate name of National Security, during the military regime, Program in Social Change and Political Participation arrests, torture and death were justified. (PROMUSPP) at the School of Arts, Sciences and While the Brazilian military dictatorship strongly Humanities of the University of São Paulo (EACH-USP) repressed social movements a strong resistance to the and professor at the University Center Estacio Radial regime was established through the underground organi- of São Paulo . Rua Dr. Luis Barreto Filho, 31, CEP zation of many social movements and struggles for 02920-140, São Paulo/ SP. amnesty and human rights, which started in the Email: [email protected] dictatorship period and lasted throughout the demo- cratization period. 50 Journal of Social Science Education ©JSSE 2015 Volume 14, Number 2, Spring 2015 ISSN 1618–5293 In 1985, in the beginning of the redemocratization We understand that history is a representation of the process social movements started to intensify their past, and an intellectual operation that breaks the struggles, bringing back public statements with more memory collective bonds, as it crystallizes on the official freedom after a twenty-one year lapse. This period was history writing. Memory, in turn, is a phenomenon of fundamental importance for our study since our always current that keeps the bonds between what was research participants were born and/or experienced this lived and the present. As stated by Decca, “The memory post-dictatorship period, meaning that their memory was is the life, always saved for the alive groups in their built under the impact of the redemocratization process name, and it is in permanent evolution, open to dialectic and an official speech that blamed the military to work as of the memory and the oblivion” (Decca, 1992: 130), political openness protagonists and the process of especially because it exceeds the limits of historiography "stretching" of the regime. This speech produced a mute and opens a multiplicity of versions about the past. on the resistance of social movements in the crisis of the Differentiating the story that opts for the great events political system of military rule. and the official memory disseminated by the discourse of The discourses analysed in this article were collected the military government this study emphasizes the between the years 2003-2005 in three Brazilian cities underground memories, those silenced and denied by (Belo Horizonte, Curitiba and Sao Paulo). The criteria for the official discourse. choosing these cities was not based on the statistical significance of a given "sample" of the population, but on 2 The legacy of dictatorship: police repression, the meanings of political events assigned by some social impunity, authoritarianism categories belonging to a locus that we consider of great Although we live in a democracy, the discourses of our importance to a study in the psychopolitical perspective. interviewees showed that the years of the Brazilian This locus consists of union and community leaders military dictatorship are still present in the Brazilian (adults who have not lived repression and were society, since dictatorship affected all Brazilian people, politically motivated). We chose São Paulo for being one not only the ones who lived at that time but later of the cities that suffered major impact during the generations, and considering that much of what we have repression time in Brazil and for considering it today is the heritage from the military regime. In their emblematic of the pivotal Rio- São Paulo area, where the memories, there are several critical aspects. main political repression centres were located and where there were major political movements at that time; the 2.1 The lack of a democratic political consciousness city of Belo Horizonte, for being considered "the cradle of Community and union leaderships admit that the the military coup", where the civil and military ruling repressive past still remains in authoritarian but staff of the Minas Gerais State articulated the military camouflaged forms in our society, in the political coup; and at least one city of southern Brazil, Curitiba, environment and also in the social movements in which which suffered a smaller impact than the state capitals of they participate, through the attitudes of certain leaders. south eastern Brazil, such as Rio de Janeiro, Sao Paulo "Much of what we still live today is a heritage of that and Belo Horizonte. In this study, we used semi- period. The very difficulty that we have to create political structured individual interviews i with three community and democratic consciousness was affected a lot due to leaders and three union representatives from each city - the military regime". (Anderson - union leadership) in a total of eighteen
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Civil-Military Relations: a Comparative Analysis of the Role of the Military in the Political Transformation of Post-War Turkey and Greece: 1980-1995
    CIVIL-MILITARY RELATIONS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE ROLE OF THE MILITARY IN THE POLITICAL TRANSFORMATION OF POST-WAR TURKEY AND GREECE: 1980-1995 Dr. Gerassimos Karabelias Final Report submitted to North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) in June 1998 1 ABSTRACT This report attempts to determine the evolution of civil-military relations in Turkey and Greece during the 1980-1995 period through an examination of the role of the military in the political transformation of both countries. Since the mid-1970s and especially after the Fall of the Berlin Wall, the struggle for spreading the winds of democracy around the globe has been the goal of all western states and particularly the United States of America. However, taking into consideration the volatility in the Balkans and in Central Asia, the military institution of Turkey and Greece which gave the impression that it withdrew in the barracks after their last intervention in 1980-83 and 1967-74 respectively, could easily be forced or even tempted to assume a greater responsibility in the conduct of each country’s domestic and foreign affairs. Only through a better understanding of its role during the 1980-95 period, we would be able to determine the feasibility of such scenarios. Using a multi-factorial model as a protection from the short- sighted results which the majority of mono-factorial approaches produce, this report starts with the analysis of the distinct role which the Armed Forces of each country have had in the historical evolution of their respective civil-military relations up to 1980 (Part One of Chapters Two and Three).
    [Show full text]
  • A Model of Praetorian States
    MIDDLE EAST INITIATIVE A Model of Praetorian States Yasser El-Shimy 2014-2015 Predoctoral Research Fellow Middle East Initiative, Belfer Center Harvard Kennedy School Co-Director Program on Civil-Military Relations in Arab States Carnegie Middle East Center Carnegie Endowment for International Peace MEI WORKING PAPER 2016-01 JUNE 2016 Middle East Initiative Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs Harvard Kennedy School 79 JFK Street, Cambridge, MA 02138 617-495-4087 www.belfercenter.org/MEI The Middle East Initiative at Harvard Kennedy School is dedicated to advancing public policy in the Middle East by convening the world’s foremost academic and policy experts, developing the next generation of leaders, and promoting community engagement on campus and in the region. Statements and views expressed in this working paper are solely those of the authors and do not imply endorsement by Harvard University, the Harvard Kennedy School, the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, or the Middle East Initiative. This working paper has not undergone formal review and approval. This working paper and the research presented herein were completed by the author as part of a Middle East Initiative (MEI) Research Fellowship. MEI Research Fellowships are made possible by the generosity of the Emirates Leadership Initiative at Harvard Kennedy School, a collaboration between MEI and the Center for Public Leadership at HKS, supported by the Government of the United Arab Emirates. This paper is a part of the Middle East Initiative Research Series, which presents the work of MEI Research Fellows, Harvard Faculty Research Grant Recipients, and other MEI research affiliates.
    [Show full text]
  • The Perfect Dictatorship? Comparing Authoritarian Rule in South Korea and in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, and Mexico1
    The Perfect Dictatorship? Comparing Authoritarian Rule in South Korea and in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, and Mexico1 Jorge I. Domínguez Harvard University Abstract The Perfect Dictatorship: Comparing Authoritarian Rule in South Korea and in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, and Mexico What is a “perfect dictatorship”? Such a regime provokes little societal resistance at installation. Its leaders act jointly to consolidate the regime and to broaden the support coalition by agreeing upon succession rules to rotate the presidency within the authoritarian regime. They delegate policy-making authority to civilians in areas of their competence. They emphasize consultation, not open contestation, prefer cooptation to repression, eschew ideological appeals, compel social actors into regime-licensed organizations, and deactivate civil society. South Korea under Park Chung Hee is compared on these dimensions to Argentina, Brazil, Chile, and Mexico, all at a time when authoritarian regimes governed them. Prepared for delivery at the 2002 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 29-September 1, 2002, Boston. Panel 11-25. Copyright by the American Political Science Association. Authoritarian rule established through an act of force, such as a military coup, poses several distinct challenges to the authoritarian ruler. The first is how to install the regime, that is, how to survive past the initial moments of the overthrow of the old regime in order to establish a pattern of rule that will last. This requires reducing the need for initial repression, consolidating unity within the coup leadership group, and arranging for succession rules in order to stabilize and broaden the support coalition for the new dictator.
    [Show full text]
  • Types of Government
    TYPES OF GOVERNMENT GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATIONS, INSTITUTIONS, AND INDIVIDUALS THAT EXERCISE POLITICAL AUTHORITY ON BEHALF OF A GROUP OF PEOPLE CITIZEN A LEGAL MEMBER OF A COUNTRY CONSTITUTION A WRITTEN PLAN OF GOVERNMENT TYPES OF GOVERNMENT Limited Unlimited In a limited government even the people !Power in the hands of one person" who make the laws have to obey them." !In unlimited governments all the power !Usually limited by constitution (plan of belongs to the ruler." government)" !There are no rules or laws that the ruler !Examples:" must obey." ­! Direct Democracy" !Examples:" ­! Representative Democracy" ­! Totalitarianism" ­! Constitutional Monarchy" ­! Monarchy" ­! Dictatorship" DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENTS DEMOCRACY: RULE BY THE PEOPLE lGovernment! is elected by the people POWER TO THE PEOPLE lEveryone! over a certain age is able to vote and has a say in who is elected to lead lElections! are held to determine who is in charge DIRECT DEMOCRACY “ALL VOTERS IN A COMMUNITY MEET IN ONE PLACE TO MAKE LAWS AND DECIDE WHAT ACTIONS NEED TO TAKE PLACE” !Pros: ­! Every citizen has equal power in matters of government. Every citizen is involved in the decision making. ­! Since all citizens are involved in decision making, there is a broad base of support and loyalty. ­! Individual liberties are protected. !Cons: ­! Only works when a small number of people are involved. Ability to gather all citizens in one place is necessary. ­! Decision making involving all citizens is time-consuming. All citizens give in-put, debate, etc... !Examples: ­! Town Hall ­! Ancient Greece in Athens REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY (REPUBLIC) PEOPLE ELECT REPRESENTATIVES TO CARRY ON THE WORK OF GOVERNMENT !Pros: ­! Citizens are too busy to learn about and vote on all laws, electing representatives that become experts in law making helps the process.
    [Show full text]
  • Chile – : the Revenge of Incomplete Democratization
    Chile –: the revenge of incomplete democratization MANUEL ANTONIO GARRETÓN Since it has been increasingly clear that Chile’s apparent consensus was an illusion and the highly praised Chilean model of ‘double transition’, to a market economy and to democracy, has been showing signs of weakness. Some diagnosed an impasse; others even failure. Intellectuals opposed to the Concertación de Partidos por la Democracia—the governing coalition formed by the Christian Democrats, Radical Party, Socialist Party and Partido por la Democracia (PPD)—had until then maintained a perplexed silence, while any potential criticism from the intellectuals close to the Concertación was silenced by the official political class, including the government and the right-wing opposition. At least two critical elements were pointed out. The context: unfinished democratization In the first place, it was questioned whether a real consensual democracy would be claimed to exist where agreement was reached on only adaptive and pragmatic matters, while the greater issues were obscured or simply excluded from debate. The big issues were plentiful and pressing: the constitutional issue, human rights, politics and the armed forces, the authoritarian enclaves (constitutional and legal norms which prevent or limit the exercise of popular sovereignty, such as nominated senators, an electoral system which gives a power of veto to a minority, quorums preventing any constitutional change, etc.), the socio-economic and redistributive model, the reduction of the leading role of the state and the weakness of decentralization, regionalization and local democratization processes, labour relations, the sustainability of the development model. While these matters remained unaddressed, there could hardly be any credible talk of consensus.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutionalism
    358 MIZAN LAW REVIEW Vol. 3 No.2, September 2009 NOTES CORNER CONSTITUTIONALISM Maru Bazezew* Meaning of Constitutionalism Today, constitutionalism has become as important an issue as that of good governance. In ordinary parlance, constitutionalism may be defined as a ‘belief in constitutional government.’ But what does constitutional government refer to? Does is it refer to a government with a constitution or government established according to a constitution, or a government acting according to a constitution? The concept seems to lack clarity. Constitutionalism can be defined as the doctrine that governs the legitimacy of government action, and it implies something far more important than the idea of legality that requires official conduct to be in accordance with pre-fixed legal rules.1 In other words, constitutionalism checks whether the act of a government is legitimate and whether officials conduct their public duties in accordance with laws pre-fixed/ pre-determined in advance. The latter definition shows that having a constitution alone does not secure or bring about constitutionalism. Except for a few states which have unwritten constitutions, today almost all the nations/states in the world have constitutions. This does not, however, mean that all these states practice constitutionalism. That is why constitutionalism is far more important than a constitution. Features (Characteristics) of Constitutionalism According to Barnett, constitutionalism embraces limitation of power (limited government), separation of powers (checks and balances) and responsible and accountable government.2 Henkin3 identifies popular sovereignty, rule of law, limited government, separation of powers (checks and balances), civilian control of the military, police governed by law and judicial control, an *LL.B, LL.M, Lecturer, St.
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy and Autocracy Readings
    Autocracy (Dictatorship) A dictatorship is a government headed by a dictator. Originally a legitimate military office in the Roman Republic, the dictator was given his powers by the Senate. The dictator had absolute power, but for a limited time. In the twentieth century, the term dictatorship has come to mean a government in which absolute power is concentrated in the hands of a dictator and sometimes his cronies. Many dictators have held the formal title of "President", but wield extraordinary, often non- constitutional or de facto powers. Dictators can come to power in a variety of different ways. They can be elected (see below), be appointed by the resident ruling party or Communist hierarchy, or inherit their position from a deceased relative. Still other modern dictators seize power in a military coup d’tat, and are supported by the military. The dictator generally controls the three state powers: legislative, executive and judicial. In a dictatorship, there is not periodical universal, free, direct and secret polling of the citizens to elect the leaders. Sometimes dictators can initially obtain power from democratic elections (like Adolf Hitler of Nazi Germany), but shortly after being elected the dictator will ban all opposing parties and cancel all future elections (see human rights). Though free elections will never occur under a dictatorship, sometimes dictators orchestrate phony elections in an attempt to grant themselves some illusion of democratic legitimacy and public support. Usually, the dictator runs for "re-election" unopposed, with voters being asked to answer a simple "yes or no" ballot on the leader's continued rule.
    [Show full text]
  • Checks and Balances in New Democracies: the Role of the Judiciary in the Chilean and Mexican Transitions: a Comparative Analysis
    Checks and Balances in New Democracies: The Role of the Judiciary in the Chilean and Mexican Transitions: A Comparative Analysis Nibaldo H. Galleguillos McMaster University Hamilton, Ontario Prepared for delivery at the 1997 meeting of the Latin American Studies Association, Continental Plaza Hotel, Guadalajara, Mexico April 17-19, 1997 Checks and Balances in New Democracies: The Role of the Judiciary in the Chilean and Mexican Transitions: A Comparative Analysis (Not a final draft as of yet. Comments are welcome. Can be quoted) INTRODUCTION The literature on democratic transition in Latin America has analysed several important aspects of the transition to liberal democracy, including constitutional reforms (O’Malley, 1991); electoral reforms and elections (Tagle, 1993); the roles of legislatures (Close, 1995); the development of grassroots democratic experiences (Escobar & Alvarez, 1993; Jaquette, 1994); civil-military relations (Loveman, 1978; Rouquieu, 1982; Skidmore, 1988; Stepan, 1988); the transformations experienced by the labour movement (Middlebrook, 1995; Valenzuela, 1983) ; the role of the church (Fleet, 1985), and, above all, the implications of profound neo-liberal economic transformations (Halebsky & Harris, 1995; O’Brian & Roddick, 1983; Petras & Leiva, 1994). Noticeably missing from the literature is the study and analysis of the social and political consequences of the role that the judiciary has been playing in the said democratic transition. Although constant references are made to the systematic violations of human rights (Americas Watch, 1995; Amnesty International, 1993) that characterized the dictatorial military regime of General Augusto Pinochet in Chile, as well as the repression of civil and political rights under the authoritarian Mexican political regime (U.S. Department of State 1995 and 1996 Human Rights Reports on Mexico), scholars and authors have not directly scrutinized the rationale behind the judiciary’s failure to enforce such liberal rights as the right to life, freedom of expression, freedom of association, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Good Governance with Checks and Balances in Ethiopia* Getachew
    Good Governance with Checks and Balances in Ethiopia* Getachew Begashaw Paper presented at Ethiopia Forum: Challenges and Prospects for Constitutional Democracy in Ethiopia International Center, Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan, March 22-24, 2019 1. Introduction Ethiopia, in its recent history, has gone through three government systems that included a monarchy, a military dictatorship, and a divisive ethnic federal system without participatory democracy. In each case, the continuity of the system was challenged by popular uprisings. However, thanks in part to the absence of democratic institutions and organizations to realize the aspirations of the people, each system was replaced by another that was as repressive as or more repressive than its predecessor. Furthermore, in each case, the popular movement was hijacked by forces that initially disguise their true form in progressive slogans and reforms, and eventually unveiled their dictatorial, autocratic and anti-democratic nature, once they consolidated power. Following the successful uprisings against the vicious TPLF/EPRDF regime, Ethiopia currently have a government in Ethiopia that assumed power with a promise of unity, love, national reconciliation, and democracy. However, despite the unconditional support the government enjoyed in the first few months of its formation, it is now facing considerable challenges from various groups, including its once ardent supporters as well as TPLF sympathizers. This paper explores what constitutes good governance and what has been missing in the context of the prevailing conditions in Ethiopia. Furthermore, it points out what the current government has to do in order to achieve a transparent process for free and fair elections, and to assure the existence of checks and balances between the three branches of government (legislative, judiciary and executive), the legal functioning of a vibrant civil society to monitor the rule of law, and the use of the appropriate institutions of the state and public forums to unite and harmonize the people.
    [Show full text]
  • UWP 38 Final.Pdf
    INSTITUTE The Grim Reaper: Extrajudicial Violence and Autocratic Rule José A. Alemán February 2021 Users Working Paper SERIES 2021:38 THE VARIETIES OF DEMOCRACY INSTITUTE Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) is a new approach to the conceptualization and measurement of democracy. It is co-hosted by the University of Gothenburg and University of Notre Dame. With a V-Dem Institute at University of Gothenburg that comprises 20 staff members, and a project team across the world with 5 Principal Investigators, 19 Project Managers, 33 Regional Managers, 134 Country Coordinators, Research Assistants, and 3200 Country Experts, the V- Dem project is one of the largest-ever data collection programs on democracy. Please address comments and/or queries for information to: V-Dem Institute Department of Political Science University of Gothenburg Sprängkullsgatan 19, Box 711 SE 40530 Gothenburg Sweden E-mail: [email protected] V-Dem Working Papers are available in electronic format at www.v-dem.net. Copyright © 2021 University of Gothenburg, V-Dem Institute. All rights reserved. Disclaimer: V-Dem does not do quality control and therefore does not endorse the content of the papers, which is the responsibility of the authors only. The Grim Reaper: Extrajudicial Violence and Autocratic Rule * José A. Alemán Professor Fordham University * I would like to acknowledge Fordham University’s support for this research through a Research Expense Program award and a Faculty Fellowship award. I would also like to thank Courteney Conrad, John Entelis, Erica Frantz, José Kaire, Graig Klein, Carl Henrik Knutsen, Enrico Antonio La Viña, Dong Wook Lee, J. Patrice McSherry, Chaitra Nagaraja, Melissa Patel, Jan H.
    [Show full text]
  • The Social Origins of Dictatorship Democracy and Socialist Revolution in Central America Jeffery M
    THE SOCIAL ORIGINS OF DICTATORSHIP DEMOCRACY AND SOCIALIST REVOLUTION IN CENTRAL AMERICA JEFFERY M. PAIGE CSST Working CRSO Working Paper #35 Paper #405 SEPTEMBER 1989 The Social Origins of Dictatorship, Democracy and Socialist Revolution in Central America By Jeffery M. Paige University of Michigan Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, San Francisco, California, August 8, 1989. We are all students of Barrington Moore, Jr., not only those of us on the panel like Professors Skocpol and Tilly, who had the privilege of studying directly with him, or like Professor Goldstone, with one of his students (in this case Professor Skocpol), but also those like Professors Brustein, Eckstein and myself who have been profoundly influenced by his work. It would be fair to say that Barrington Moore, Jr. created the modern study of revolution just as he contributed profoundly to the current golden age of comparative historical sociology and the revival of political sociology represented by this section. In this year of anniversaries of revolutions great and small, the French, the Chinese, the Cuban, the Nicaraguan, it is only fitting that we turn to an examination of the ideas of a man who restored the study of revolution to a central place at the core of the sociological discipline. His Social .. of D- remains the most widely accepted and influential theory not only of revolution but of the origins of democracy, authoritarianism, and revolutionary socialism El Salvador, Costa Rica, and Nicaragua, three small countries in a region that was once the most obscure corner of the sp&ish colonial empire, may seem a strange place to begin an .
    [Show full text]
  • Military Authoritarianism and Political Change in Uruguay by Howard Handelman
    19781No. 26 South America Military Authoritarianism and Political Change in Uruguay by Howard Handelman The militarization of Uruguayan politics represents a sharp break with the nation's d~mocraticpast. Despite economic iation and signs of disagreement within ~drmedforces, there is no reason to sxpect an early return to civilian rule. [HH-1-78] ISSN 01 61 -0724 The American Universities Field INSTITUTIONAL MEMBERS Staff, Inc., founded in 1951, is a non- American profit, membership corporation of University of Alabama American educational institutions. It The Asia Society universities- em~lovsa full-time staff of foreign Aspen Institute for Humanistic area specialists who write from Studies abroad and make periodic visits to Brown University Field Staff member institutions. AUFS serves Dartrnouth College the public through its seminar pro- Indiana University grams, films, and wide-ranging pub- Institute for the Study of World lications on significant develop- Politics ments in foreign societies. University of Kansas Michigan State University Ramapo College of New Jersey University of Pittsburgh University of Wisconsin AUFS Reports are a continuing Associates of the Field Staff are series on international affairs and chosen for their ability to cut across major global issues of our time. the boundaries of the academic dis- Reports have for almost three ciplines in order to study societies in decades reached a group of their totality, and for their skill in col- readers- both academic and non- lecting, reporting, and evaluating academic-who find them a useful data. They combine long residence source of firsthand observation of abroad with scholarly studies relat- political, economic, and social trends ing to their geographic areas of in foreign countries.
    [Show full text]