DOCSLIB.ORG

Caltrain Hillsdale Station Survey Results

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Caltrain Hillsdale Station Survey Results Caltrain Hillsdale Station Survey Results Methodology Survey link distributed at Caltrain Hillsdale Station July 24, 2019, between 5:00 a.m. and 3:45 p.m. 14 surveyors Approx. 2,898 links distributed Survey closed July 31, 2019 Response Counts Completion Rate: 96.1% Complete 967 Partial 39 Totals: 1,006 1. How often do you usually travel to or from Hillsdale Caltrain station? 1% Less than once a month 9% 6-7 days/week 1% 1-3 days/month 1% 1 day/week 1% 2 days/week 3% 3 days/week 10% 4 days/week 74% 5 days/week Value Percent Responses 6-7 days/week 9% 91 5 days/week 74% 748 4 days/week 10% 96 3 days/week 3% 32 2 days/week 1% 15 1 day/week 1% 7 1-3 days/month 1% 9 Less than once a month 1% 8 Totals: 1,006 2. How do you typically get to Hillsdale Station before boarding the train? (your selection should represent the longest part of your trip by distance) 1% TNC (like Lyft, Uber) 1% SamTrans 4% Other – specify: 7% Free shuttle 11% Bike 44% Walk 11% Get dropped off by car 21% Drive car Value Percent Responses Walk 44% 436 Drive car 21% 209 Get dropped off by car 11% 109 Bike 11% 108 Free shuttle 7% 74 Other – specify: 4% 42 SamTrans 1% 13 TNC (like Lyft, Uber) 1% 9 Totals: 1,000 Other – specify: Count Scooter 6 Totals 42 Other – specify: Count BART 3 Bus 2 Light Rail 2 scooter 2 AC Transit 1 AC Transit - Line M 1 BART (from 16th Street Station to Millbrea) 1 Bike half the time, run half the time 1 Bike or car 1 Bike, Free Shuttle or Walk. 1 Bike, Public Transit, and/or walk 1 Bus (San Francisco) 1 Drive my car to San Jose Diridon, then take the train to Hillsdale 1 Drive to local neighborhood, park, walk from there 1 Electric Scooter 1 Electric scooter 1 I travel to Hillsdale from San Jose 1 Local AC Transit bus route 1 Morning commute - I come via train from Morgan Hill to Hillsdale then catch a shuttle to my 1 offices at Shutterfly Muni 1 Scooter 1 Scooter (not electric) 1 Totals 42 Other – specify: Count Shuttle provided by company Visa Inc 1 Take the AC transit M bus 1 This question makes no sense. I take BART to Millbrae and then Caltrain to Hillsdale 1 VTA Bus - 81 Moffett/Ames Ctr 1 Vespa scooter 1 board train in san jose dirodon station. 1 combination of "walk, drive, and get dropped off by car" 1 escooter 1 personal electric scooter 1 Totals 42 3. When you get off the train at Hillsdale Station, how do you typically get to your final destination? (your selection should represent the longest part of your trip by distance) 1% TNC (like Lyft, Uber) 1% SamTrans 3% Other – specify: 5% Get picked up by car 10% Bike 51% Walk 13% Drive car 14% Free shuttle Value Percent Responses Walk 51% 513 Free shuttle 14% 142 Drive car 13% 126 Bike 10% 105 Get picked up by car 5% 55 Other – specify: 3% 35 SamTrans 1% 14 TNC (like Lyft, Uber) 1% 11 Totals: 1,001 Other – specify: Count BART 4 Scooter 4 Bus 2 Electric scooter 2 MUNI 2 Muni 2 VTA 2 scooter 2 AC Transit - Line M 1 AC transit M bus 1 Bike half the time, run half the time 1 Bike, Free Shuttle or Walk. 1 Bike, Public Transit, and/or walk 1 Bus (VTA) 1 Electric Scooter 1 MUNI OR WALK 1 Public Bus 1 Scooter 1 Scooter (not electric) 1 Shuttle provided by Company (Visa Inc) 1 combination of "walk, drive, and get dropped off by car" 1 escooter 1 personal electric scooter 1 Totals 35 4. What is the main purpose of your trip when riding Caltrain to and from Hillsdale station? 1% Social/recreational 98% Work Value Percent Responses Work 98% 980 Social/recreational 1% 8 Going home 0% 5 School 0% 4 Other - specify: 0% 3 Shopping 0% 2 Totals: 1,002 Other - specify: Count Giants games 1 Going to work and going home 1 Therapy 1 Totals 3 5. Thinking about your typical trip when boarding the train at Hillsdale Station. 0 0%% 9 9:0:000 p p.m.m. .t oto 1 122:5:599 a a.m.m.. 0 0%% 1 1:0:000 p p.m.m. .t oto 2 2:5:599 p p.m.m.. 1 1%% 1 111:0:000 a a.m.m. .t oto 1 122:5:599 p p.m.m.. 1 1%% 7 7:0:000 p p.m.m. .t oto 8 8:5:599 p p.m.m.. 7 7%% 3 3:0:000 p p.m.m. .t oto 4 4:5:599 p p.m.m.. 6 6%% 9 9:0:000 a a.m.m. .t oto 1 100:5:599 a a.m.m.. 7 7%% 5 5:0:000 a a.m.m. .t oto 6 6:5:599 a a.m.m.. 5 577%% 7 7:0:000 a a.m.m. .t oto 8 8:5:599 a a.m.m.. 2 211%% 5 5:0:000 p p.m.m. .t oto 6 6:5:599 p p.m.m.. Response Total Responses Percent 7:00 a.m. to 8:59 a.m. — 324 (8:24 a.m.) 66 7% 7:00 a.m. to 8:59 a.m. — 217 (7:54 a.m.) 63 6% 7:00 a.m. to 8:59 a.m. — 313 (7:24 a.m.) 61 6% 7:00 a.m. to 8:59 a.m. — 225 (8:35 a.m.) 59 6% 7:00 a.m. to 8:59 a.m. — 323 (8:25 a.m.) 56 6% 7:00 a.m. to 8:59 a.m. — 227 (8:59 a.m.) 39 4% 7:00 a.m. to 8:59 a.m. — 218 (7:54 a.m.) 38 4% 5:00 p.m. to 6:59 p.m. — 267 (5:11 p.m.) 37 4% Response Total Responses Percent 7:00 a.m. to 8:59 a.m. — 215 (7:35 a.m.) 33 3% 7:00 a.m. to 8:59 a.m. — 314 (7:24 a.m.) 29 3% 5:00 p.m. to 6:59 p.m. — 264 (5:15 p.m.) 28 3% 5:00 a.m. to 6:59 a.m. — 207 (6:54 a.m.) 27 3% 5:00 p.m. to 6:59 p.m. — 370 (5:43 p.m.) 24 2% 5:00 p.m. to 6:59 p.m. — 371 (5:20 p.m.) 24 2% 7:00 a.m. to 8:59 a.m. — 216 (7:35 a.m.) 24 2% 7:00 a.m. to 8:59 a.m. 21 2% 9:00 a.m. to 10:59 a.m. — 233 (9:35 a.m.) 20 2% 7:00 a.m. to 8:59 a.m. — 211 (7:11 a.m.) 18 2% 7:00 a.m. to 8:59 a.m. — 226 (8:35 a.m.) 18 2% 5:00 p.m. to 6:59 p.m. — 277 (6:11 p.m.) 17 2% 7:00 a.m. to 8:59 a.m. — 228 (8:54 a.m.) 17 2% 3:00 p.m. to 4:59 p.m. — 360 (4:36 p.m.) 16 2% 5:00 p.m. to 6:59 p.m. — 381 (6:20 p.m.) 16 2% 5:00 p.m. to 6:59 p.m. — 274 (6:15 p.m.) 15 2% Response Total Responses Percent 3:00 p.m. to 4:59 p.m. — 263 (4:51 p.m.) 14 1% 5:00 a.m. to 6:59 a.m. — 305 (6:19 a.m.) 14 1% 3:00 p.m. to 4:59 p.m. — 262 (4:52 p.m.) 13 1% 7:00 a.m. to 8:59 a.m. — 221 (8:14 a.m.) 13 1% 9:00 a.m. to 10:59 a.m. — 232 (9:13 a.m.) 12 1% 5:00 a.m. to 6:59 a.m. — 206 (6:34 a.m.) 11 1% 9:00 a.m. to 10:59 a.m. — 231 (9:09 a.m.) 11 1% 5:00 p.m. to 6:59 p.m. 10 1% 5:00 p.m. to 6:59 p.m. — 268 (5:25 p.m.) 10 1% 5:00 a.m. to 6:59 a.m. — 208 (6:54 a.m.) 9 1% 3:00 p.m. to 4:59 p.m. 8 1% 3:00 p.m. to 4:59 p.m. — 159 (4:10 p.m.) 8 1% 5:00 p.m. to 6:59 p.m. — 273 (5:49 p.m.) 7 1% 9:00 a.m. to 10:59 a.m. — 134 (9:39 a.m.) 7 1% 5:00 p.m. to 6:59 p.m. — 380 (6:44 p.m.) 6 1% 5:00 p.m. to 6:59 p.m. — 272 (5:52 p.m.) 5 1% Response Total Responses Percent 9:00 a.m. to 10:59 a.m. — 135 (10:08 a.m.) 5 1% 3:00 p.m. to 4:59 p.m. — 156 (3:42 p.m.) 4 0% 5:00 a.m. to 6:59 a.m. 4 0% 5:00 p.m. to 6:59 p.m. — 283 (6:49 p.m.) 4 0% 7:00 p.m.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • May 7, 2019 Media Contact: Dan Lieberman, 650-508-6385 Samtrans and Caltrain Encourage Cycling on Bike to Work Day This Thursday
    NEWS May 7, 2019 Media Contact: Dan Lieberman, 650-508-6385 SamTrans and Caltrain Encourage Cycling on Bike to Work Day This Thursday, May 9, Bay Area bicyclists will participate by the thousands in the 25th Annual Bike to Work Day, an annual event that encourages commuters to choose bicycles over cars for their daily commute. SamTrans buses can carry two bikes on racks at the front of each bus, and two additional bikes are allowed inside the bus, depending on passenger loads. Some things to know: only single-rider, two-wheel bicycles are permitted. There is no age limit for riders using the bike racks or bringing bikes on board the bus. However, riders must be able to load and unload their bikes without help from the operator. On Caltrain, every train is equipped with at least two bike cars. Due to the popularity of the onboard bike program, capacity for bicyclists can be a challenge. Cyclists are encouraged to choose local trains with lighter ridership to ensure they are able to board if they want to test out biking to work for the first time. Some express and limited stop trains are already operating at or near capacity for onboard bikes. Each weekday approximately 6,000 bicyclists take a bike on the train, more than any other rail service in the country. While biking and taking public transit can work well together for first- and last-mile connections, as well as getting people out of their cars and off freeways, onboard capacity may be at its limit on Bike to Work Day.
    [Show full text]
  • San Mateo County Transportation Authority (Ta) 1250 San Carlos Avenue, San Carlos, Ca 94070
    SAN MATEO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (TA) 1250 SAN CARLOS AVENUE, SAN CARLOS, CA 94070 MINUTES OF APRIL 7, 2011 MEMBERS PRESENT: R. Foust (Chair), C. Groom, D. Horsley, J. Lee, K. Matsumoto, T. Nagel MEMBERS ABSENT: J. Vreeland STAFF PRESENT: R. Bolon, J. Cassman, M. Choy, G. Harrington, C. Harvey, R. Haskin, J. Hurley, R. Lake, M. Lee, M. Martinez, N. McKenna, D. Miller, S. Murphy, M. Simon Chair Rosanne Foust called the meeting to order at 5:03 p.m. Director Terry Nagel led the Pledge of Allegiance. CONSENT CALENDAR a. Approval of Minutes of March 3, 2011 b. Acceptance of Statement of Revenues and Expenditures for February 2011 The Board approved the consent calendar unanimously (Nagel/Horsley). PUBLIC COMMENT Jim Bigelow, Belmont, said this would be the last TA Board meeting for TA Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) member Pat Dixon who is moving out of the area. He said it has been fantastic working with her over the years. Her heart was in Measure A and its implementation and she was an excellent chair for the CAC. He wished her the best and warm thoughts as she leaves the area. Pat Giorni, Burlingame, asked that public comment be changed from one to three minutes. She said Caltrans refuses to fix storm drainage problems until Burlingame cuts down trees along El Camino Real. She said flooding on El Camino Real will hinder congestion management movement and asked that the TA speak to Caltrans. She said Ms. Dixon was a major mentor in all things transportation. Chair Foust said concerns about the flooding and Caltrans will be forwarded to staff.
    [Show full text]
  • ACT BART S Ites by Region.Csv TB1 TB6 TB4 TB2 TB3 TB5 TB7
    Services Transit Outreach Materials Distribution Light Rail Station Maintenance and Inspection Photography—Capture Metadata and GPS Marketing Follow-Up Programs Service Locations Dallas, Los Angeles, Minneapolis/Saint Paul San Francisco/Oakland Bay Area Our Customer Service Pledge Our pledge is to organize and act with precision to provide you with excellent customer service. We will do all this with all the joy that comes with the morning sun! “I slept and dreamed that life was joy. I awoke and saw that life was service. I acted and behold, service was joy. “Tagore Email: [email protected] Website: URBANMARKETINGCHANNELS.COM Urban Marketing Channel’s services to businesses and organizations in Atlanta, Dallas, San Francisco, Oakland and the Twin Cities metro areas since 1981 have allowed us to develop a specialty client base providing marketing outreach with a focus on transit systems. Some examples of our services include: • Neighborhood demographic analysis • Tailored response and mailing lists • Community event monitoring • Transit site management of information display cases and kiosks • Transit center rider alerts • Community notification of construction and route changes • On-Site Surveys • Enhance photo and list data with geocoding • Photographic services Visit our website (www.urbanmarketingchannels.com) Contact us at [email protected] 612-239-5391 Bay Area Transit Sites (includes BART and AC Transit.) Prepared by Urban Marketing Channels ACT BART S ites by Region.csv TB1 TB6 TB4 TB2 TB3 TB5 TB7 UnSANtit
    [Show full text]
  • Caltrain TIRCP Application Jan
    PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY APPLICATION FOR 2018 TRANSIT AND INTERCITY RAIL CAPITAL PROGRAM FUNDS PROJECT NARRATIVE A. Project Title Page Project Title: Peninsula Corridor Electrification Expansion Project The Peninsula Corridor Electrification Expansion Project (EEP) includes a series of incremental investments in the 51-mile Caltrain Corridor between the 4th and King Station (San Francisco) and the Tamien Station (San Jose). These investments are focused on expanding and fully converting Caltrain’s mainline diesel fleet to electric trains. This investment builds on and leverages the existing Peninsula Corridor Electrification Project (PCEP) and supports the goals of the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP), providing increased capacity and service flexibility, supporting state and interregional connectivity, and reducing greenhouse gas emissions through elimination of diesel service from the mainline Peninsula Corridor. In addition to providing immediate, direct benefits, the EEP also represents an incremental step within a larger program of development that will evolve the Peninsula Corridor in a way that supports the ridership, service levels, and connectivity goals contemplated in the draft 2018 State Rail Plan. The central component of Caltrain’s 2018 TIRCP application is the purchase of 96 additional Electric Multiple Units (EMU). This procurement will fully exercise all available options under Caltrain’s current contract with Stadler and will provide sufficient EMUs to fully electrify Caltrain’s mainline fleet, while also sustaining and expanding capacity to accommodate growing demand. In addition to requesting funds for the purchase of EMUs, Caltrain is also requesting a smaller amount funding for a series of associated projects that will equip the corridor to receive and operate a fully electrified fleet in a way that allows the railroad to reap the maximum benefit from its investments.
    [Show full text]
  • SBC Executivesummfac
    CAPITOL CORRIDOR SOUTH BAY CONNECT AUGUST 2020 Purpose Study Area and Project Elements South Bay Connect proposes to relocate the Capitol Corridor passenger rail service between the Oakland N Coliseum and Newark from the Union Pacific Railroad (UP) Niles Subdivision to the Coast Subdivision for a faster, more direct route. It will also create new transbay connections for passengers between the East Bay and Peninsula by connecting to bus and shuttle services at the Ardenwood Station. The project is not proposing an increase in Capitol Corridor service frequency or changes to UP’s freight service, but does not preclude service growth in the future. The relocation will facilitate the separation of passenger and freight rail, resulting in improved rail operations, efficiency, and reliability while minimizing rail congestion within the corridor. Proposed New Station and Railroad Potential Station Area Proposed Capitol Corridor (CC) Service Potential Station Considered and Eliminated Existing CC Service Existing Station CC Service to be Discontinued Station where CC Service Study Area to be Discontinued UP Improvement Area BART Station Benefits Reduce passenger rail travel time between Oakland and San Jose and throughout the larger megaregion to increase ridership on transit, ease congestion on the Bay Area’s stressed roadways, and decrease auto commutes. Diversify and enhance network integration by reducing duplicative capital investments and dif- ferentiating Capitol Corridor’s intercity rail service from commuter rail and other transit services, including BART’s extension to San Jose. Support economic vitality by permitting enhanced rail movement and the preservation of freight rail capacity in the Northern California market through the reduction of existing conflicts between freight rail operations and passenger rail service.
    [Show full text]
  • Hayward Transit Routes Map (PDF)
    Verdese Carter Rec. Ctr. Snow Bldg. Elmhurst NX3 98 Comm. Prep Hellman Transit Park ELMHURST Holly Elmhurst- 40 NXC Mini- Lyons Field 75 Dunsmuir Information Elmhurst INTERNATIONALPark BLVD 57 Foothill Plaza Square 45 East Bay House & 1 0 6 T H A V M V Gardens Lake Chabot A A Reg’l Parks 9 8 T H A V 45 C H Municipal A 08T BANCROFT AV R 1 Hq Golf Course 98 T H UR Hayward 45 1 0 4 T H A V B NX4 Dunsmuir Ridge LV D 75 Open Space Clubhouse NXC 0 0.5mi Station Durant Stonehurst D Square L V V A D M B Victoria A Park O O O R REVE R E EDE 1 0 5 T H A V B R Park S A Roosevelt V 45 Plgd. Farrelly NX3 0 0.5km Hayward SAN LEANDRO BLVD 1 75 Shefeld 45 Pool Rec. Ctr. San Leandro BART N McCartney 75 Milford Park Park SHEFFIELD Tyrone D U T T O N A V 1 10 75 85 89 Carney 75 Onset A 40 VILLAGE Map Key Park C Park A Chabot L R A E E 1 4 T H S T Park Shuttles NL SL N N D E You Are Here S Vets. W D Siempre R O 75 Mem. G Verde Park O R BART D Bldg. A D 45 City N Willow Park BART Memorial R R CAPISTRANO DR D Hall Bancroft T D L A O Public R Park B C A L L A N A V A K D Root Library Mid.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Station Profiles
    2015 BART Station Profile Study Station Profiles – Non-Home Origins STATION PROFILES – NON-HOME ORIGINS This section contains a summary sheet for selected BART stations, based on data from customers who travel to the station from non-home origins, like work, school, etc. The selected stations listed below have a sample size of at least 200 non-home origin trips: • 12th St. / Oakland City Center • Glen Park • 16th St. Mission • Hayward • 19th St. / Oakland • Lake Merritt • 24th St. Mission • MacArthur • Ashby • Millbrae • Balboa Park • Montgomery St. • Civic Center / UN Plaza • North Berkeley • Coliseum • Oakland International Airport (OAK) • Concord • Powell St. • Daly City • Rockridge • Downtown Berkeley • San Bruno • Dublin / Pleasanton • San Francisco International Airport (SFO) • Embarcadero • San Leandro • Fremont • Walnut Creek • Fruitvale • West Dublin / Pleasanton Maps for these stations are contained in separate PDF files at www.bart.gov/stationprofile. The maps depict non-home origin points of customers who use each station, and the points are color coded by mode of access. The points are weighted to reflect average weekday ridership at the station. For example, an origin point with a weight of seven will appear on the map as seven points, scattered around the actual point of origin. Note that the number of trips may appear underrepresented in cases where multiple trips originate at the same location. The following summary sheets contain basic information about each station’s weekday non-home origin trips, such as: • absolute number of entries and estimated non-home origin entries • access mode share • trip origin types • customer demographics. Additionally, the total number of car and bicycle parking spaces at each station are included for context.
    [Show full text]
  • North Central San Mateo Community-Based Transportation Plan
    North Central San Mateo Community-Based Transportation Plan DRAFT Appendices Appendix A: Stakeholder Committee .......................................................................................2 Appendix B: Existing Conditions Report....................................................................................3 Executive Summary............................................................................................................................. 8 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 10 Chapter 1 - Profile of the North Central San Mateo Neighborhood.............................................. 11 Chapter 2 - Transportation................................................................................................................ 25 Chapter 3 - City and County Plans .................................................................................................. 48 Chapter 4 - Transportation Plans...................................................................................................... 57 Chapter 5 - Transportation Gaps...................................................................................................... 61 Appendix C: Community Outreach .......................................................................................62 Chapter 1 - Resident Travel Survey Highlights ................................................................................ 63 Chapter 2 - Other Outreach
    [Show full text]
  • Caltrain Bicycle Access & Parking Plan
    Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board CCaallttrraaiinn BBiiccyyccllee AAcccceessss && PPaarrkkiinngg PPllaann October 2, 2008 Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board CCaallttrraaiinn BBiiccyyccllee AAcccceessss && PPaarrkkiinngg PPllaann October 2, 2008 Prepared by: Eisen|Letunic Transportation, Environmental and Urban Planning www.eisenletunic.com In association with: Fehr & Peers Transportation Consultants Table of Contents Chapters 4.5 Millbrae bicycle parking & boardings ................ 24 4.6 Millbrae issues & recommendations ................... 24 4.7 San Mateo bicycle parking & boardings ............. 25 Executive Summary ........................................................ iii 4.8 San Mateo issues & recommendations ............... 25 1. Introduction .................................................................. 1 4.9 Hillsdale bicycle parking & boardings ............... 26 2. Background .................................................................. 5 4.10 Hillsdale issues & recommendations .................. 26 3. Systemwide Issues ..................................................... 11 4.11 Redwood City bicycle parking & boardings ...... 27 4. Station‐specific Issues ............................................... 21 4.12 Redwood City issues & recommendations ........ 27 5. Innovations ................................................................. 33 4.13 Palo Alto parking & boardings ............................ 28 6. Funding and Next Steps ........................................... 37 4.14 Palo Alto issues &
    [Show full text]
  • Hillsdale Station Temporary Closure
    Hillsdale Station Temporary Closure Virtual Town Hall April 9, 2020 Agenda All plans are subject to change based on COVID-19 service changes and funding ▪ Project Overview ▪ Development of Rider Closure Plan ▪ Rider Closure Plan ▪ Customer & Community Communication 2 Project Overview Rafael Bolon Project Manager, Caltrain 3 25th Ave Grade Sep Project Benefits Overall Project Benefits • Pedestrian, cyclist, and motorist safety • Safe rail operations and fewer system-wide delays • Improved traffic flow and enhanced east-west connectivity • Reduced train horn noise New Station Benefits • Centerboard platform: Convenient access to both north and southbound trains • Additional and improved shelters • New landscaping, mosaic wall, aesthetics inspired by Bay Meadows 4 Elevated Track & New Station Location 5 Station Improvements 6 Hillsdale Station Closure Part of Larger Project Closure Begins: May 16, 2020 ▪ Duration: Up to 6 months ▪ Closure Needed – Transition ground-level tracks to elevated tracks – Create east-west connection at 28th Avenue – Build new Hillsdale Station (closer to 28th Avenue) ▪ Caltrain will continue overall passenger service for its daily commuters during the closure 7 Development of Rider Lori Low Gov/Community Affairs Officer, Closure Plan Caltrain 8 Process: Plan Development ▪ Analyzed Survey Data and Annual Counts ▪ Reviewed train timetables and bus / shuttle frequency ▪ Analyzed rider bus / shuttle needs and capacity ▪ Reviewed public feedback ▪ Focused on rider experience during the closure ▪ Acknowledged challenges
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Clara City Council Presentation
    Caltrain Electrification Update Santa Clara City Council Presentation December 4, 2018 Agenda • Caltrain System Overview • Project Overview • Electric Train Design • Santa Clara Construction Activities • Questions Caltrain System • 32 Stations Gilroy to San Francisco • 92 Weekday Trains JPB owns right-of-way • At-Grade Crossings, from SF to San Jose viaducts, and bridges • Intermodal Connections • Bike Commuters Ridership At Capacity Today Bi-directional commute with riders standing on trains going southbound and northbound Aging Fleet At Retirement Age: 20/29 loco; 73/134 cars Regional Transportation Needs • US 101 and Interstate 280 Congested • Corridor supports growing economy • 75% Caltrain riders commute to work • 60% are choice riders Project Description Area Project Service 51 miles Electrification: Up to 79 mph • Overhead Contact Service Increase San Francisco System (OCS) • 6 trains / hour / direction to San Jose • Traction Power • More station stops / reduced travel (Tamien Station) Facilities time Electric Trains • Restore Atherton & Broadway service • 75 percent of fleet Mixed-fleet service (interim period) Continue tenant service • ACE, Capital Corridor, Amtrak, Freight Service Benefits Metric Today PCEP Example Baby Bullet Train Retain 5-6 stops 60 minutes 45 minutes Retain SF to SJ 6 stops 13 stops 60 minutes Example Redwood City Station Train stops / peak 3 5 hour Note: Prototypical Train and Schedule Key Regional Benefits (2040) Note: 2013 BAC Report, generates $2.5B economic activity and 9,600 jobs Schedule Electric Train
    [Show full text]
  • Redwood City Transit Center Redesign Study
    Draft Summary Report Redwood City Transit Center Redesign Study October 2019 Redwood City Transit Center Redesign Study Summary Report Background ......................................................................... 1 Figure 1: Location and Components of the Existing Project History ................................................................ 1 Transit Center................................................................. 3 Figure 2: Existing Transit Center Site Configuration – Project Goals ................................................................... 2 Looking Northeast from El Camino Real .................... 13 Study Description............................................................ 4 Figure 3: Phase 1 – Short Term: Existing Transit Center Site Improvements ...................................................... 15 Existing Conditions ............................................................. 5 Figure 4: Phase 2 – Long Term: Existing Transit Center Existing Transit Services ................................................ 5 Site Improvements ....................................................... 17 Parking ............................................................................ 6 Figure 5: Perry Street and Caltrain Parking Lot Configuration – View from the Arguello Street Transit Center Amenities ................................................ 6 Side of the Site ............................................................. 18 Land Use and Zoning ...................................................... 6 Figure
    [Show full text]