DOCSLIB.ORG

HONG KONG Is IRREPLACEABLE

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
HONG KONG Is IRREPLACEABLE Why HONG KONG is IRREPLACEABLE 26 FEB 2021 PROGRAMME WWW.AAIL.ORG 2 WHY HONG KONG IS IRREPLACEABLE SPEAKER Ms Teresa CHENG GBS SC JP Secretary for Justice Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China Ms Teresa Cheng, SC, is the Secretary for Justice of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China. Prior to her appoint- ment as the Secretary for Justice, Ms Cheng was a Senior Counsel in private practice, a chartered engineer, a chartered arbitrator, and an accredited mediator. She was frequently engaged as arbitrator or counsel in complex international commercial or investment disputes. Ms Cheng was one of the founders and Chairman of the Asian Academy of International Law. Apart from being a Past Chairperson of the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre, Ms Cheng is also a Past Vice President of the International Council of Commercial Arbitration and a Past Vice President of the ICC International Court of Arbitration. In 2008, she became the first Asian woman elected through a global election as President of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators. She served as Deputy Judge/Recorder in the Court of First Instance of the High Court of Hong Kong from 2011 to 2017. She is a member of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes Panel of Arbitrators, and was a member of the World Bank’s Sanctions Board. Ms Cheng is a Fellow of King’s College in London, and was the Course Director of the International Arbitration and Dispute Settlement Course at the Law School of Tsinghua University in Beijing. WHY HONG KONG IS IRREPLACEABLE 3 SPEAKER Dr Anthony NEOH QC SC JP Chairman Asian Academy of International Law Dr Anthony Neoh is a senior member of the Hong Kong Bar specialising in international litigation, arbitration and financial regulatory matters. In 1979, he commenced practice at the Hong Kong Bar after serving for 13 years in the Hong Kong Civil Service. From 1991 to 1994, he was a member of the Hong Kong Stock Exchange Council and its Listing Committee, and chaired its Disciplinary Committee and Debt Securities Group, and was Co-Chairman of the Legal Committee of the Hong Kong and China Listing Working Group. He was the chief architect of the legal structure for the listing of Chinese enterprises in Hong Kong. He is former Chairman of the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission from 1995 to 1998; during this time, he was the first Asian to be elected Chairman of the Technical Committee of the International Organization of Securities Commissions. From 1999 to 2004, he was Chief Advisor of the China Securities Regulatory Commission, at the personal invitation of former Premier Zhu Rongji. On 1 June 2018, Dr Neoh was appointed as Chairman of the Hong Kong Independent Police Complaints Council to serve a term of two years. He was the Convenor of the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) Expert Group on the Finance Academy and now serves as Member of the HKMA Preparatory Committee for the Finance Academy. He is also the Co-Chairman of 2018 B20 Financing Growth and Infrastructure Task Force, and Co-Chairman of The China Securitization Forum. 4 WHY HONG KONG IS IRREPLACEABLE SPEAKER Mr Eddie YUE JP Chief Executive Hong Kong Monetary Authority Mr Eddie Yue was appointed Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) from 1 October 2019. He began his career as an Administrative Officer in the Hong Kong SAR Government in 1986. He joined the HKMA upon its establishment in 1993 and was promoted to Division Head a year later. He was appointed Executive Director in 2001 and subsequently Deputy Chief Executive in 2007 before taking up his current position. Mr Yue has partici- pated in numerous areas of the HKMA’s work. During his tenure as Deputy Chief Executive, he steered major policies and initiatives relating to reserves management, research, external affairs, and market development. Mr Yue was also actively involved in tackling major financial crises and played an instru- mental role in enhancing the Linked Exchange Rate System. Mr Yue was educated at the Chinese University of Hong Kong and the Harvard Business School. WHY HONG KONG IS IRREPLACEABLE 5 SPEAKER Mr Stephen PHILLIPS Director-General of Investment Promotion Invest Hong Kong, The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Mr Stephen Phillips is the Director-General of Investment Promotion at Invest Hong Kong (InvestHK), the Government Department responsible for attracting and facilitating foreign direct investment into Hong Kong. In a career focused on Asia for more than thirty years, Mr Phillips first moved to Hong Kong in 1989, holding senior investment banking positions with Deutsche and BZW/Barclays Capital before co-founding a Hong Kong-based group of companies providing IT, financial and consultancy services across Asia. In 2004, he joined the UK’s Department of International Trade before becoming the Chief Executive of the China Britain Business Council in 2006, as well as Chairman of the EU China Business Association. Mr Phillips holds a BSc in Chemistry and Law from the University of Exeter. 6 WHY HONG KONG IS IRREPLACEABLE (Listed in alphabetical order) SPEAKER Mr Conrad CHAN Partner Kwok Yih & Chan Conrad specialises in advising on cross-border mergers and acquisitions in both the public and private spheres, private equity transactions, insolvency/ corporate workouts and debt restructuring, listings and public offerings, capital markets transactions (debt and equity), regulatory investigation, joint ventures, and other commercial transactions across various jurisdictions. He frequently acts for and advises multinational as well as Mainland and regional clients on a wide range of matters. He is regularly rated by various organisa- tions, including IFLR1000, Chambers Global, Chambers Asia Pacific and Asia Law, as one of the leading lawyers in the areas of capital markets, corporate/ merges and acquisitions, and private equity. Conrad sits on various panels and tribunals, including the Takeovers and Mergers Panel, Takeovers Appeal Committee, Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (as Deputy Convenor), Disciplinary (Panel A) of the Hong Kong Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Appeal Tribunal Panel of the Buildings Ordinance (as Chairman), and the Appeal Panel of the Travel Industry Council. WHY HONG KONG IS IRREPLACEABLE 7 SPEAKER Mr John CHOONG Partner Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer John is Head of Freshfields’ China International Arbitration Practice, and has many years of experience counselling clients on international dispute matters throughout Asia. He regularly acts as trusted adviser to leading international and Chinese corporates, including Fortune 500 companies, on their most significant disputes. These have included a number of publicly reported billion-dollar matters. He is listed as a leading individual for dispute resolution and arbitration by the legal directories, and is a Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators. He sits on various arbitration committees and organisations, including as council member, and is regularly appointed as presiding or sole arbitrator under the leading arbitration rules. John is the author or editor of books published by the Oxford University Press and Sweet & Maxwell, including as co-General Arbitration Editor of the Hong Kong White Book. 8 WHY HONG KONG IS IRREPLACEABLE SPEAKER Mr Brian GILCHRIST Partner Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP As a world leading mediation expert, Mr Gilchrist practices dispute resolution, with a focus on commercial litigation. He is also an experienced advisor on regulatory matters and has handled both domestic and multijurisdictional arbitrations. Mr Gilchrist has acted as a key legal advisor to many of the largest Hong Kong and international companies and institutions. He has acted for as well as against Regulators, and is recognised in the market as someone who is usually involved in any ‘bet the company’ dispute in Hong Kong. Mr Gilchrist has sat as a Deputy Judge of the High Court of the Hong Kong SAR, as well as tribunal chairman for a statutory body dealing with appeals. He has been elected and currently serves as a Vice President of The Law Society of Hong Kong, having joined the Council since early 2009. Mr Gilchrist has acted as the Honorary Legal Advisor to the British Consul General in Hong Kong for over 15 years. Apart from contributing to different legal publications, he has also sat on the High Court Rules Committee and the Solicitors Higher Rights of Audience Assessment Board, and is presently a member of the Court of Final Appeal Rules Committee and the Standing Committee on Legal Education and Training, as well as a member of a number of other statutory bodies and committees. WHY HONG KONG IS IRREPLACEABLE 9 SPEAKER Ms Carmen KAN General Counsel Bank of China (Hong Kong) Limited Ms Carmen Kan is General Counsel of Bank of China (Hong Kong) Limited (BOCHK) and was previously General Manager, Legal & Compliance and Operational Risk Management Department of BOCHK. Currently she is also the Vice-Chairman of Legal Affairs Steering Committee of the Hong Kong Chinese Enterprises Association. She is one of the first batch of lawyers qualified in Hong Kong (1993) and the Mainland of China (1995). She also obtained a Master of Public Administration from Tsinghua University. Ms Kan was named as one of ‘The ALB In-House 25’ in 2018 by Thomson Reuters’ Asian Legal Business. She was also selected as one of the ‘Top 20 Global General Counsel’ by Financial Times in 2017 and was awarded ‘Woman Lawyer of the Year (In-House) 2017’ by Asian Legal Business. She led the legal team in winning the ‘Asia Pacific Innovative Lawyers Outstanding Award’ in 2016 and 2019, awarded by Financial Times and The Legal 500 respectively. Prior to her current tenure with BOCHK, Ms Kan spent ten years with Clifford Chance and had been a banking and finance partner of the firm since 2003, and served as the Chief Representative of its Beijing office for four years.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Discourse, Social Scales, and Epiphenomenality of Language Policy: a Case Study of a Local, Hong Kong NGO
    Discourse, Social Scales, and Epiphenomenality of Language Policy: A Case Study of a Local, Hong Kong NGO Item Type text; Electronic Dissertation Authors Tso, Elizabeth Ann Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 27/09/2021 12:25:43 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/623063 DISCOURSE, SOCIAL SCALES, AND EPIPHENOMENALITY OF LANGUAGE POLICY: A CASE STUDY OF A LOCAL, HONG KONG NGO by Elizabeth Ann Tso __________________________ Copyright © Elizabeth Ann Tso 2017 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the GRADUATE INTERDISCIPLINARY PROGRAM IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION AND TEACHING In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2017 2 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Dissertation Committee, we certify that we have read the dissertation prepared by Elizabeth Tso, titled Discourse, Social Scales, and Epiphenomenality of Language Policy: A Case Study of a Local, Hong Kong NGO, and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. _______________________________________________ Date: (January 13, 2017) Perry Gilmore _______________________________________________ Date: (January 13, 2017) Wenhao Diao _______________________________________________ Date: (January 13, 2017) Sheilah Nicholas Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent upon the candidate’s submission of the final copies of the dissertation to the Graduate College.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Servants' Guide to Good Practices
    CCivil Servants' Guide to Good Practices Civil Service Bureau 2005 CONTENTS Foreword 3 1. Core Values of the Civil Service 5 2. Attendance and Diligence at Work 7 3. Supervisory Responsibilities 9 4. Probity 11 5. Acceptance of Advantages and Entertainment 13 6. Conflict of Interest 15 7. Declaration of Investments 17 8. Outside Work and Post-Service Employment 19 9. Upholding the Integrity of the Civil Service 21 10. Misconduct in Public Office 23 11. Sources of Advice and Information 25 Annex I - Answers to Some Common Questions asked on Acceptance of Advantages and Entertainment 27 Annex II - Answers to Some Common Questions asked on Misconduct in Public Office 35 FFOREWORD Dear Colleagues, We are privileged to have in Hong Kong a civil service that is acclaimed for its efficiency and honesty. The way our civil service conducts itself is guided by a set of core values that have endured the test of time. These core values have shaped the culture and character of the civil service as we know it today, namely, a clean, professional and meritocratic body of public servants. The qualities of our civil service have taken many years to build and to sustain. Both the Administration and the community recognise that the preservation of these qualities is an essential pillar for effective governance. The publication of this "Guide to Good Practices" underlines our commitment to uphold the fine culture and character of our civil service. In simple language, it sets out the good behaviour expected of civil servants at all levels, including those appointed on non-civil service terms.
    [Show full text]
  • The Public Sector in Hong Kong
    THE PUBLIC SECTOR IN HONG KONG IN HONG PUBLIC SECTOR THE THE PUBLIC SECTOR IN HONG KONG his book describes and analyses the role of the public sector in the T often-charged political atmosphere of post-1997 Hong Kong. It discusses THE PUBLIC SECTOR critical constitutional, organisational and policy problems and examines their effects on relationships between government and the people. A concluding chapter suggests some possible means of resolving or minimising the difficulties which have been experienced. IN HONG KONG Ian Scott is Emeritus Professor of Government and Politics at Murdoch University in Perth, Australia and Adjunct Professor in the Department of Public and Social Administration at the City University of Hong Kong. He taught at the University of Hong Kong between 1976 and 1995 and was Chair Professor of Politics and Public Administration between 1990 and 1995. Between 1995 and 2002, he was Chair Professor of Government and Politics at Murdoch University. Over the past twenty-five years, he has written extensively on politics and public administration in Hong Kong. G O V E P O L I C Y Professor Ian Scott’s latest book The Public Sector in Hong Kong provides a systematic analysis of Hong Kong’s state of governance in the post-1997 period Ian Scott R and should be read by government officials, politicians, researchers, students and N general readers who seek a better understanding of the complexities of the city’s M government and politics. E — Professor Anthony B. L. Cheung, President, The Hong Kong Institute of Education; N T Member, Hong Kong SAR Executive Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Economy of Hong Kong's Open Skies Legal Regime
    The Political Economy of Hong Kong's "Open Skies" Legal Regime: An Empirical and Theoretical Exploration MIRON MUSHKAT* RODA MUSHKAT** TABLE OF CONTENTS I. IN TRO DU CTIO N .................................................................................................. 38 1 II. TOW ARD "O PEN SKIES". .................................................................................... 384 III. H ONG K ONG RESPONSE ..................................................................................... 399 IV. QUEST FOR ANALYTICAL EXPLANATION ............................................................ 410 V. IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL REGIMES .................................................... 429 V 1. C O N CLU SION ..................................................................................................... 4 37 I. INTRODUCTION Hong Kong is widely believed to epitomize the practical virtues of the neoclassical economic model. It consistently outranks other countries in terms of the criteria incorporated into the Heritage Foundation's authoritative Index of Economic Freedom. The periodically challenging and potentially * Adjunct Professor of Economics and Finance, Syracuse University Hong Kong Program. ** Professor of Law and Director of the Center for International and Public Law, Brunel Law School, Brunel University; and Honorary Professor, Faculty of Law, University of Hong Kong. tumultuous transition from British to Chinese rule has thus far had no tangible impact on its status in this respect. A new post-1997 political
    [Show full text]
  • Eflyer-Invest HK
    WHY HONG KONG webinar series SUPPORTERS MEDIA PARTNER 30 APRIL 2021 16:00 - 19:00 (GMT+8) Friday In the wake of the success of the webinar ‘Why Hong Kong Is Irreplaceable’, the Department of Justice of the Hong Kong SAR and the Asian Academy of International Law are launching a webinar series ‘Why Hong Kong’ with the recent ‘Why Arbitrate in Hong Kong’ as the first edition, and ‘Why Invest in Hong Kong: Current Opportunities’ as the second one. Focusing on Hong Kong’s preponderant role as a leading global financial centre and international legal hub, ‘Why Invest in Hong Kong: Current Opportunities’ sets out to examine the strengths and challenges of Hong Kong from both legal and economic perspectives, demonstrating why Hong Kong is and will continue to be a hub for international inbound and outbound investments. Eminent experts in the legal and business fields will bring to the fore the core strengths of Hong Kong such as its legal and regulatory framework and the free flow of capital. Speakers will also deliberate on opportunities in direct investment and capital markets coupled with Hong Kong’s unique position in the Greater Bay Area that make Hong Kong an attractive investment hub in the region. FREE REGISTRATION https://zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_jpwBWdFvRQqqFHoavqDwgw Enquiries For further details, please visit [email protected] https://aail.org/2021-why-invest-in-hk/ TIME (GMT+8) PROGRAMME Welcome Remarks 16:00–16:10 • Ms Teresa Cheng GBS SC JP Secretary for Justice, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of External Change on Civil Service Values in Post-Colonial Hong Kong* John P
    522 The Impact of External Change on Civil Service Values in Post-Colonial Hong Kong* John P. Burns† and Li Wei‡ Abstract Scholarly work in the 1990s indicated that the values of civil servants in late colonial Hong Kong were evolving from those of classical bureaucrats to those of more political bureaucrats as the political and social environment changed. Based on in-depth interviews with 58 politicians and senior civil servants carried out between 2009 and 2012, we argue that Hong Kong civil service values have adapted owing in part to external shocks such as regime change and governance reform. Still, traditional civil service values such as fiscal prudence and balancing various community interests continue to be prominent. We illustrate the influence of civil service values in two pol- icymaking cases: small-class teaching and minimum-wage legislation. Keywords: Hong Kong civil service values; politicians and bureaucrats; policymaking; governance reform Values are enduring beliefs that influence the available choice of means and ends.1 Civil servants play an important role in policymaking, thus their values are of great significance.2 Not surprisingly, governments spend considerable effort on shaping the values of civil servants, encouraging values such as political respon- siveness and public service.3 The literature suggests that administrative reforms and the changing political context can also impact civil service values.4 This article examines the impact of the handover of sovereignty in 1997 and the introduction of major governance reform in 2002 on civil service values in Hong Kong. By observing the values of bureaucrats and politicians before and after * The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the Hong Kong Research Grants Council in the production of this article.
    [Show full text]
  • The Harmonization of Hong Kong and PRC Law Tahrih V
    Loyola University Chicago Law Journal Volume 30 Article 3 Issue 4 Summer 1999 1999 Mixing River Water and Well Water: The Harmonization of Hong Kong and PRC Law Tahrih V. Lee Harvard University Follow this and additional works at: http://lawecommons.luc.edu/luclj Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Tahrih V. Lee, Mixing River Water and Well Water: The Harmonization of Hong Kong and PRC Law, 30 Loy. U. Chi. L. J. 627 (1999). Available at: http://lawecommons.luc.edu/luclj/vol30/iss4/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by LAW eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Loyola University Chicago Law Journal by an authorized administrator of LAW eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Mixing River Water and Well Water: The Harmonization of Hong Kong and PRC Law The 1998 Wing Tat Lee Lecture* Tahirih V. Lee** The Chinese language is rich with pithy yet evocative sayings. Their terseness makes them easy to remember, fun to use, and relatively safe when the intended meaning contradicts official discourse. One such saying, which enjoys a great deal of popularity in Hong Kong, is he soi bat fan hah soi. Roughly translated, this means, "River water does not mix with well water." The saying's underlying meaning cannot be found in dictionaries or official sources. According to rumor, however, river water represents Guangdong' natives and well water refers to Hong Kong natives. A likely reason for the saying's popularity in Hong Kong is its emphasis on the gulf between Hong Kong locals and the inhabitants of mainland China.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Council Panel on Public Service
    LC Paper No. CB(1)2342/03-04(01) For information LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL PANEL ON PUBLIC SERVICE Information Note on the Outcome of the Pilot Scheme on Team-based Performance Rewards in the Civil Service Purpose This paper briefs Members on the report submitted by the consultant on the pilot scheme on team-based performance rewards in the civil service. Background 2. A pilot scheme on team-based performance rewards was launched within the civil service in end 2001. The objective of the initiative is to test out the feasibility and practicability of introducing performance-based rewards in the civil service. Six departments, namely, Buildings Department, Electrical and Mechanical Services Department, Government Flying Service, Home Affairs Department, Judiciary and Rating and Valuation Department participated in the pilot scheme on a voluntary basis. The rewards were funded by departmental savings under the “Save and Invest Account” arising from the Enhanced Productivity Programme or in the case of Electrical and Mechanical Services Department (a trading fund department), by retained surpluses. The participating departments did not get any additional funding for implementing the pilot scheme. 3. The Civil Service Bureau (CSB) engaged a consultant to provide advice and assistance to the participating departments in the design and implementation of the pilot scheme. Following the completion of the six departmental pilot schemes, the consultant conducted an evaluation on the effectiveness of the pilot scheme and submitted a report to the CSB. An executive summary of the consultancy report on the scheme is at the Annex. The consultant’s assessment of the pilot scheme 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Hong Kong
    SPONSORS SUPPORTERS MEDIA PARTNER WHY HONG OGEMID KONG webinar series 25 JUN 2021 16:00 - 19:00 (GMT+8) In the final edition of the ‘Why Hong Kong’ webinar series, ‘Why Invest in Hong Kong – A Look to the Future’, prominent legal practitioners and renowned business leaders shall deliberate on various promising prospects of investing in Hong Kong – the indispensable nexus between China and the world. In particular, the panel discussion will address the pivotal topics of ‘Investing in and through Hong Kong’, ‘Investment Infrastructure in Hong Kong – New Initiatives in Legal and Finance’ and ‘Hong Kong Going Forward in the Wake of China’s Future Development’. FREE REGISTRATION https://zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_Qgc60KCSTj68wMV-GUiYfw Enquiries For further details, please visit event website [email protected] https://aail.org/2021-a-look-to-the-future/ TIME (GMT+8) PROGRAMME Welcome Remarks 16:00–16:10 • Mr Stephen Phillips Director-General of Investment Promotion, Invest Hong Kong, The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Keynote Speech 16:10–16:30 • Dr Victor Fung GBM GBS Chairman, Fung Group and 2022 Foundation Panel I: Investing in and through Hong Kong Convenor • Ms May Tai Managing Partner (Asia), Herbert Smith Freehills Panellists (Listed in alphabetical order) 16:30–17:15 • Mr Lester Huang SBS JP Co-Chairman, P. C. Woo & Co. • Mrs Ann Kung Deputy Chief Executive, Bank of China (Hong Kong) • Dr Simon Hoey Lee MH JP Chief Strategy Officer (Greater Bay Area), China Resources Group Q & A Panel II: Investment Infrastructure
    [Show full text]
  • One Country, Two Systems
    CHAPTER THREE ONE COUNTRY, TWO SYSTEMS Democratic Structures 3.1 Despite the pledges of continuity, the achievement of a smooth transfer is a complex task. It involves: localisation of laws and personnel, negotiations between Hong Kong and third parties over treaty arrangements, the review of a variety of systems in policing, customs, immigration and so on. The smooth implementation of the transfer is the responsibility of the Joint Liaison Group (JLG), based in Hong Kong but meeting also in Beijing and London. It consists of a senior representative from each side and four other representatives with up to 20 supporting staff. Much has been achieved; however areas of dispute and concern have arisen, almost always to do with extension of political democracy, the structures for democratic government - the legislature, the executive, the electoral processes and the courts - and the protection of human rights. The Legislature 3.2 The legislature is one of the keys to democratic government.1 In Hong Kong, the controversy over the shape and nature of the post-transfer legislature is fuelled by the late application of democratic forms to the local legislature, by the reaction of the people of Hong Kong to the events in China in 1989 and the subsequent reaction of the Chinese Government to international condemnation.2 3.3 A Legislative Council was established within a year of Hong Kong becoming a Crown colony. The Charter issued in 1843 by the British Government instructed the first Governor, Sir Henry Pottinger, to establish a Legislative Council with advisory capacity only. It was to have no real powers and no non-official members until 1850, and then they were carefully selected.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Service Code
    CIVIL SERVICE CODE 1 Introduction 1.1 The Civil Service is the backbone of the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. It is responsible to the Chief Executive. It supports the Chief Executive and the Government of the day in formulating, explaining and implementing policies; conducting administrative affairs; delivering public services; and undertaking law enforcement and regulatory functions. It serves the community, and contributes to the effective governance and stability and prosperity of Hong Kong. 1.2 Article 99 of the Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China (hereafter referred to as “the Basic Law”) states “…. Public servants must be dedicated to their duties and be responsible to the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region”. Article 60 of the Basic Law states “The head of the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall be the Chief Executive of the Region….”. Article 48 provides that the “Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall exercise the …. powers and functions ….to appoint or remove holders of public office in accordance with legal procedures….”. Civil servants, being a key component of the public service, have the constitutional role to give their best in serving the Chief Executive and the Government of the day. 1.3 Civil servants are appointed, managed and promoted on the basis of merit and in accordance with the principles of openness and fairness and with the prevailing rules and regulations applicable to the Civil Service. They are subject to the prevailing disciplinary system for the Civil Service, under which allegations of misconduct against individual civil servants are determined through an impartial process based on consideration of factual evidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Entire Report
    Task Force on Review of Civil Service Pay Policy and System Phase One Final Report September 2002 CONTENTS PAGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY iv – xvii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 – 5 2 REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT OF CIVIL SERVICE 6 – 11 PAY POLICY AND SYSTEM IN HONG KONG 3 LONG-TERM VISION 12 – 15 4 PAY POLICIES, PAY SYSTEM AND PAY 16 – 35 STRUCTURE 5 REPLACING FIXED PAY SCALES WITH PAY 36 – 43 RANGES 6 PAY ADJUSTMENT SYSTEM AND MECHANISM 44 – 54 7 INTRODUCING PERFORMANCE-BASED 55 – 61 REWARDS 8 SIMPLIFICATION AND DECENTRALISATION OF 62 – 71 PAY ADMINISTRATION 9 CONCLUSION 72 – 78 10 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 79 APPENDIX I Letter of 18 December 2001 from the Secretary for 80 – 84 the Civil Service inviting the three advisory bodies to undertake a review of civil service pay policy and system i PAGE APPENDIX II Membership of the Task Force 85 III Staff of the Joint Secretariat for the Advisory Bodies 86 on Civil Service and Judicial Salaries and Conditions of Service IV Terms of reference of the Task Force 87 – 88 V List of organisations represented in consultation 89 – 96 forums of the Task Force VI List of organisations which made written 97 – 100 submissions during the consultation period VII List of bureaux and departments whose directorate 101 officers met with the Standing Committee on Directorate Salaries and Conditions of Service on 14 May 2002 VIII List of disciplined services whose senior 102 management met with the Standing Committee on Disciplined Services Salaries and Conditions of Service on 24 May 2002 IX Existing civil service pay scales 103 X Methodology of pay trend survey 104 – 108 ii PAGE APPENDIX XI Increment cost deduction formula 109 - 111 XII Final Report of the Consultancy Study on the Latest Developments in Civil Service Pay Administration in Other Governments (To view written comments forwarded to the Joint Secretariat during the public consultation period from April to June, please visit the Joint Secretariat’s website at http://www.jsscs.gov.hk/.
    [Show full text]