DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Report 2007-08

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Annual Report 2007-08 Department of Premier and Cabinet © Crown in the Right of the State of Tasmania 2008 For copies or further information regarding this annual report please contact: Department of Premier and Cabinet GPO Box 123 HOBART Tasmania 7001 Phone: (03) 6233 3738 Fax: (03) 6233 2769 Email: [email protected] Website: www.dpac.tas.gov.au ISSN 1448 9023 (print) ISSN 1448 9031 (online) This report is printed on carbon neutral paper Department of Premier and Cabinet GPO Box 123 HOBART TAS 7001 Phone: (03) 6233 3738 Fax: (03) 6233 2769 Email: [email protected] Website: www.dpac.tas.gov.au David Bartlett, MP PREMIER Dear Premier In accordance with the requirements of Section 36(1) of the State Service Act 2000 and Section 27 of the Financial Management and Audit Act 1990, I enclose for presentation to Parliament, the 2007-08 Annual Report of the Department of Premier and Cabinet. Yours sincerely Rhys Edwards Secretary 17 October 2008 The Department of Premier and Cabinet (DPAC) is a central agency of the Tasmanian State Government. The Department is responsible to the Premier and the Minister for Local Government as portfolio ministers, and also provides support to the Parliamentary Secretary and other members of Cabinet. The Department provides a broad range of services to the Cabinet, other members of Parliament, Government agencies and the community. The Department works closely with the public sector, the community, local government, the Australian Government and other state and territory governments. The Department also provides administration support to the State Service Commissioner and the Tasmania Together Progress Board, each of which is separately accountable and reports directly to Parliament. Department of Premier and Cabinet Annual Report 2007-08 2 Content Secretary’s Report 5 Departmental Overview 7 Governance 8 Activity Report 2007-08 12 Output Group 1 - Support for Executive Decision Making 13 Output 1.1: Strategic Policy and Advice 14 Output 1.2: Climate Change 18 Output 1.3: Social Inclusion 21 Output Group 2 - Government Processes and Services 23 Output 2.1: Management of Executive Government Processes 24 Output 2.2: Principal and Subordinate Legislation 31 Output 2.3: Tasmanian Government Courier 33 Output 2.4: Corporate Support to Ministerial and Parliamentary Offices and the Office of the Governor 34 Output 2.5: Representation in Canberra 35 Output 2.6: Support for the Stolen Generations Assessor 38 Output Group 3 - Electronic Services for Government Agencies and the Community 40 Output 3.1: ICT Policy Development and Implementation 41 Output 3.2: Management and Ongoing Development of Service Tasmania 44 Output 3.3: Management of TASINET and Networking Tasmania 46 Output 3.4: Information Systems Management 49 Output Group 4 - State Service Management 51 Output 4.1: State Service Employment and Management 52 Output 4.2: Support for the State Service Commissioner 55 Output Group 5 - Support for the Tasmania Together Progress Board 56 Output 5.1: Support for the Tasmania Together Progress Board 57 Output Group 6 - Community Development 61 Output 6: Community Development 62 Output 6.1: Women Tasmania 65 Output 6.2: Disability Bureau 69 Output 6.3: Seniors Bureau 71 Output 6.4: Office of Aboriginal Affairs 75 Department of Premier and Cabinet Annual Report 2007-08 3 Output 6.5: Multicultural Tasmania 78 Output 6.6: Office of Children and Youth Affairs 80 Output Group 7 - Development of Local Government 85 Output 7.1: Development of Local Government 86 All Output Groups - Corporate Services 91 Corporate Services 92 Supporting Whole-of-Government Corporate Initiatives 95 Tasmania Together 96 Tasmania Together – Lead Agency Responsibility 100 Disability Action Plan 102 DPAC’s Carbon Emission Reduction Plan 103 Departmental Information 104 Freedom of Information (FOI) 105 Legislation Administered 107 Departmental Publications 110 Our People and Policies 114 Our Finance Policies and Procedures 126 Financial Resources Summary 127 Asset Management, Pricing and Risk Management Policies 128 Government Procurement 130 Contributions and Grants 134 Financial Statements 157 Appendix 222 Jim Bacon Foundation 223 Tsuneichi Fujii Fellowship Foundation 228 Abbreviations 235 Compliance Index 237 Contacting the Department 240 Activities accompanied by the Tasmanian Together logo indicate that these activities directly support the achievement of a Tasmania Together benchmark. Department of Premier and Cabinet Annual Report 2007-08 4 Secretary’s Report The Department of Premier and Cabinet (DPAC) has undergone many changes during 2007-08. The most significant being the change in heads of the agency over the past year. Linda Hornsey was the Secretary of the Department from July to September 2007. Evan Rolley was the Secretary from October 2007 to May 2008 and I was appointed to the position of Secretary in June 2008. I therefore would like to acknowledge the work of the previous Secretaries during the majority of the year, in particular, their work in establishing the Tasmanian Climate Change Office and the Social Inclusion Unit. This year we have taken on extra roles with a busy COAG agenda. Working groups were established to provide practical plans in seven key areas which both the Commonwealth and the States need to work together on. The seven key areas are: health and ageing education, skills and early childhood climate change and water infrastructure business, deregulation and competition housing indigenous reform. Tasmania had representatives in each of these areas. It has been a great opportunity to collaborate with other departments. The Secretary of DPAC was nominated to be the Deputy Chair of the National Housing Working Group. Taking part in this process has provided Tasmania with the opportunity to play a significant role in the way national policies concerning affordable housing will be put into action. Premier Lennon set out the State Government’s priorities and policies in early 2008. These included literacy and numeracy, affordable housing, child welfare, infrastructure projects, drought proofing Tasmania and climate change initiatives. A major priority was building stronger social inclusion policy frameworks for the State. This led to the establishment of the Social Inclusion Unit in February 2008. Mellissa Gray (Astrinakis) was appointed the first Director of the Unit. The Unit has been working on projects with other government departments and key community groups to provide better, practical outcomes for the socially disadvantaged. In the few short months since being established, the Unit has hosted visits from Rosanne Haggerty and Theo Maras, who met with prominent public and private sector groups to help shape practical measures to address homelessness in Tasmania. Rosanne Haggerty’s report, Ending Homelessness in Tasmania, provides a basis for further work on a Tasmanian Homelessness Strategy. The report included recommendations based on the Common Ground model she pioneered. Ms Haggerty’s recommendations provide a solid basis for the Government’s plan to halve primary homelessness by 2010. Another area of initial work for the Unit involved the Literacy Action Plan. The Policy Division has been working together with the Department of Education, Dr Carol Christensen and a range of stakeholders in the community and the business sector. The Department of Premier and Cabinet Annual Report 2007-08 5 Literacy Action Plan will provide local-level actions focusing on early childhood, school-age and adult literacy. Climate change is a major priority for the State Government; this was reflected by establishing the Tasmanian Climate Change Office within DPAC at the beginning of 2008. The Office has been leading the implementation of the Government’s climate change strategy by providing advice on and assisting with the development of a whole-of- government policy on climate change. The Tasmanian Climate Change Office has been working with business, industry and the community to identify economic opportunities and facilitate innovative climate change initiatives. The Office has also been coordinating the implementation of Dr Kate Crowley’s framework for action to reduce Tasmanian Government emissions. Dr Crowley is the Acting Dean of Graduate Research at the University of Tasmania, and the inaugural Chair of the Tasmanian Climate Action Council. The Office also prepared legislation to put before Parliament setting a greenhouse gas emissions reduction target for the State of at least 60 per cent below 1990 levels by 2050. The Government is taking steps to reduce its own greenhouse gas emissions, like changing over its car fleet to more fuel efficient vehicles, and encouraging Government agencies to develop their own emissions reduction plans. It is always nice to receive recognition for the work we are doing at DPAC. I am pleased to congratulate the members of the DPAC Disability Action Plan Working Group. The Disability Action Plan working group was recognised by National Disability Services (NDS), the national industry association for non-government disability service providers, for making DPAC the first Tasmanian Government department to develop a Disability Action Plan. In addition, the Disability Bureau was recognised for implementing the Companion Card Program and its work promoting disability action planning across government. Service Tasmania Unit Manager Glenn Hill, who chaired the DPAC working group, received an honourable mention. The award was presented by NDS National CEO Ken Baker and accepted by Disability Bureau Manager Beverley Funnell on behalf of DPAC. The Department ensures that Tasmanian businesses are given every opportunity to compete for agency business. It is the Department’s policy to support Tasmanian businesses whenever they offer best value for money for the Government. The tables on pages 130-133 summarise the level of participation by local businesses for contracts, tenders and/or quotations with a value of $50,000 or over (excluding GST). I would also like to take this opportunity to thank Frank Ogle and his team at the Public Sector Management Office who have been working tirelessly for a positive outcome for the Public Sector Unions Wages Agreement (PSUWA) 08.
Recommended publications
  • Tasmanian Prospectus Paul Lennon Premier, Tasmania

    Tasmanian Prospectus Paul Lennon Premier, Tasmania

    Tasmanian Prospectus Paul Lennon Premier, Tasmania Message from the Premier of Tasmania Tasmania is open for business. My Government is prepared to back projects that we believe will benefit the state. My Government is very keen to hear from people looking to invest in a state of unlimited Through the proposed A$.4 billion pulp mill, opportunities. we have a great opportunity to add value to our timber products. There are many reasons why you should invest in Tasmania. The granting of a licence to international betting exchange company Betfair is another example of We have the lowest direct labour costs in the the Government backing good projects. Betfair nation. We also have the lowest labour turnover came to us because they knew Tasmania was open in the country and the lowest business licensing for business and that we would listen to their and planning costs. Tasmania has the lowest level proposal. of industrial disputes of any state in the country. Tasmania has a booming tourism industry, thanks We are also the nation’s second-lowest-taxing largely to the purchase of the Melbourne-to- state or territory. Devonport passenger ships and the best-ever air access into the state. More and more people With the roll-out of natural gas in the state are flocking to Tasmania because we offer a and availability of hydro electricity, Tasmania has lifestyle that has almost disappeared from the plentiful and cost-competitive energy sources. modern world. Investment in tourism-related infrastructure has grown substantially as more Private investment is booming and we are people discover the state as a holiday destination.
  • Celebrating 80 Years Years 1939-2019

    Celebrating 80 Years Years 1939-2019

    CELEBRATING YEARS 1939-2019 ‘ Children First’ Foreword My congratulations to Lady Gowrie Tasmania on a very significant contribution to our community over 80 years. My enduring memory of Lady Gowrie - over a number of years! - is of a bright, buzzing and safe place for inquisitive young minds to play and learn. And wonderful educators, in whom parents and carers place great trust. I know that many lifelong relationships are also born at Lady Gowrie, which has a special place in our community. Best wishes, The Hon Will Hodgman MP Premier Minister for Tourism, Hospitality and Events Minister for Parks Minister for Heritage Minister for Trade 2 CELEBRATING 80 YEARS YEARS 1939-2019 Contents Acknowledgements 4 Children First 5 Introduction 6 Part 1 – The 20th Century 7 Early Days 8 1930’s and 1940’s 10 1950’s 20 1960’s 25 1970's 32 1980's 33 1990's 36 Part 2 – The 21st Century 39 Lady Gowrie Tasmania 46 Services in the 21st Century Reflections on Gowrie 60 In Conclusion 62 References 64 Current Services and Programs 66 2019 3 Acknowledgements There are countless individuals, both past and present, who have been and continue to be an important part of the Lady Gowrie Tasmania story. Their contribution across the past 80 years is acknowledged and valued as they paved the way for others to follow. To those who have been so generous with their time – to reminisce and provide their stories for this publication, again this is so highly appreciated. Lady Gowrie Tasmania engaged the Gowrie Training & Consultancy team to take the lead in in researching and documenting the 80-year history publication.
  • AGENDA This Agenda Is Provided for the Assistance and Information of Members of the Public

    AGENDA This Agenda Is Provided for the Assistance and Information of Members of the Public

    PUBLIC AGENDA This Agenda is provided for the assistance and information of members of the public. AGENDA NOTICE is hereby given that an Ordinary meeting of the Kingborough Council will be held in the Civic Centre, Kingston on Wednesday, 13 December 2017 at 5.30pm Back (L – R): Cr Paul Chatterton, Cr Mike Percey, Cr Sue Bastone, Cr Dean Winter, Cr Richard Atkinson Front (L – R): Cr Dr Graham Bury, Cr Flora Fox, Mayor Cr Steve Wass, Deputy Mayor Cr Paula Wriedt, Cr David Grace QUALIFIED PERSONS In accordance with Section 65 of the Local Government Act 1993, I confirm that the reports contained in Council Meeting Agenda No. 26 to be held on Wednesday, 13 December 2017 contain advice, information and recommendations given by a person who has the qualifications or experience necessary to give such advice, information or recommendations. TONY FERRIER ACTING GENERAL MANAGER 7 December 2017 ORDER OF BUSINESS Open Session Page No. Apologies 2 Confirmation of Minutes of Council Meeting No. 25 held on 27 November 2017 2 Workshops held Since Council Meeting on 27 November 2017 2 Declarations of Interest 2 Transfer of Agenda Items 3 Guidelines for Public Question Time 3 Questions on Notice from the Public 4 Questions Without Notice from the Public 4 Questions on Notice from Councillors 4 1 New Flight Paths Over Kettering and Bruny Island 4 2 Bees 5 3 Budget and Community Involvement 5 4 Convict Stone Wall Repair, Bonnet Hill 6 5 Snug Beach 6 6 Old Vodafone Site, Huntingfield 7 7 Kingston Beach Pontoon 7 8 Delegated Authority Policy 8 Questions Without Notice from Councillors 8 Motions of Which Notice has been Given 8 Petitions Still Being Actioned 8 Petitions Received in Last Period 8 Officers Reports to Planning Authority 9 Delegated Authority for the Period 15 November 2017 to 28 November 2017.
  • Uncorrected Proof Issue

    Uncorrected Proof Issue

    UNCORRECTED PROOF ISSUE Tuesday 24 June 2008 - Estimates Committee B (Bartlett) - Part 1 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ESTIMATES COMMITTEE B Tuesday 24 June 2008 MEMBERS Mr Dean Mr Finch Mr Wing Mrs Jamieson Mrs Rattray-Wagner (Chair) Ms Ritchie SUBSTITUTE MEMBERS IN ATTENDANCE Hon. David Bartlett, Premier; Minister for Education and Skills; Minister for Workplace Relations Department of Premier and Cabinet Greg Johannes, Executive Director Marguerite Scott, Director, Community Development Rhys Edwards, Secretary Rebekah Burton, Deputy Secretary Phil Foulston, Director, Executive Division Anna Cuthbertson, Executive Officer Jeff Reeve, Acting Director, Corporate Services Peter Wright, Manager, Finance Frank Ogle, Director, Public Sector Management Office John McCormick, Director, Policy Jamie Bayly-Stark, Director, Policy Phil Hoysted, Director, Tasmania Together Progress Board Mellissa Astinakis, Director, Social Inclusion Unit Hayden Jones, Project Manager Estimates B 1 24 June 2008 UNCORRECTED PROOF ISSUE Department of Justice Lisa Hutton, Secretary Brian Smith, Deputy Secretary Michael Stevens, Deputy Secretary Peter Fischer, State Planning Adviser Roy Ormerod, General Manager, Workplace Standards Department of Education John Smyth, Secretary Greg Glass, Deputy Secretary, Corporate Services Jenny Gale, General Manager, Strategic Policy and Performance Liz Banks, General Manager, Learning Services North-West Lynne James, Manager, State Programs - Students Andrew Finch, Director, Finance, Facilities and Business Support Sue Kennedy, Manager,
  • EMRS State Voting Intentions Poll March 2020

    EMRS State Voting Intentions Poll March 2020

    emrs enterprise marketing & research services EMRS State Voting Intentions Poll March 2020 17th March 2020 © 2020 EMRS © 2018 EMRS emrs EMRS State Voting Intentions March 2020 Polling was conducted from the 3rd to the 10th of March 2020. 1,000 adult Tasmanian residents were interviewed and responses weighted to reflect the Tasmanian adult voting population. A sample of this size provides a margin of error of +/- 3 percentage points at the 95% confidence level. This report has been prepared by Enterprise Marketing and Research Services 60 Main Road, Moonah TAS 7009 All enquiries should be addressed to: Samuel Paske Managing Director EMRS Phone: (03) 6211 1222 PO Box 402 Fax: (03) 6211 1219 Moonah TAS 7009 E-mail: [email protected] © 2020 EMRS © 2018 EMRS Tasmanian Voting Intentions emrs Figure 1 – Decided Voters Supporting or Leaning towards a Party The latest EMRS poll was conducted from the 3rd to the 10th of March 2020 calling 60 both landline and mobile telephone numbers 50% throughout Tasmania. 47% 44% 43% • Support for the Liberal State Government remained relatively steady, down just 40 1 percentage point from the 33% 34% last poll in December 2019 to 31% 43% currently. 29% • Support for the Labor Party increased by 3 percentage points since December 2019, 20 now at 34%. 13% 13% 12% • The Greens support 10% decreased by just 1 12% percentage point since the 11% 11% last poll was conducted, and 7% currently stands at 12%. 0 • Of the remaining decided Actual Election November '19 December '19 March '20 Result '18 voters, 11% said they would vote for an alternative to the three major parties, down Liberal Labor Greens Other just 1 percentage point from the December 2019 poll.
  • DRAFT Kingborough Sport and Recreation Facilities

    DRAFT Kingborough Sport and Recreation Facilities

    DRAFT Kingborough Sport and Recreation Facilities Strategy 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 2.0 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 5 2.1 PURPOSE OF STRATEGY 6 2.2 STUDY AIMS AND OBJECTIVES 7 2.3 VISION 7 2.4 PLANNING PRINCIPLES 8 2.5 METHODOLOGY 9 2.6 STRATEGY CONTEXT 10 3.0 REVIEW OF RELEVANT REPORTS/STRATEGIES 10 3.1 STATE AND REGIONAL PLANS 10 3.2 KINGBOROROUGH COUNCILS STRATEGIES AND PLANS 13 4.0 CONSULTATION 17 4.1 STAKEHOLDER SURVEY’S 18 4.2 KEY ISSUES FROM CONSULTATION 19 5.0 DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE 20 5.1 DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE KINGBOROUGH MUNICIPALITY 21 6.0 PARTICIPATION TRENDS 23 6.1 BROADER SPORT AND RECREATION TRENDS 25 6.2 UNSTRUCTURED/NON COMPETITIVE/CASUAL RECREATION ACTIVITIES 25 6.3 MODIFICATION OF SPORTS 25 6.4 VOLUNTEERS 26 6.5 CHANGING PATTERNS OF WORK 26 6.6 ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY 26 6.7 IMPLICATIONS FOR SPORT AND RECREATION PLANNING 27 7.0 FACILITY NEEDS AND ASSESSMENT CRITERIA 28 7.1 TRACKS AND TRAILS 28 7.2 SPORTS PAVILIONS, OVALS AND ASSOCIATED FACILITIES 29 8.0 STRATEGIES 30 8.1 SPORTS COURTS (OUTDOOR) 30 8.2 NETBALL FACILITIES 32 8.3 SPORTS PAVILION REDEVELOPMENT AND IMPROVEMENT 33 8.4 SPORTSGROUNDS AND ASSOCIATED FACILITIES 37 8.5 RECREATIONAL TRAILS 40 8.6 KINGBOROUGH SPORTS CENTRE 44 8.7 OTHER RECREATION FACILITIES 45 9.0 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 46 10.0 APPENDIX 54 DRAFT: Kingborough Sport and Recreation Facilities Strategy 2012 Page 2 Version 1 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Kingborough Sport and Recreation Facilities Strategy (KSRFS) has been developed to provide a clear, planned and pragmatic approach to the development of new sport and recreation facilities as well as the upgrading of existing facilities.
  • David Bartlett, MP PREMIER Dear Premier in Accordance with The

    David Bartlett, MP PREMIER Dear Premier in Accordance with The

    David Bartlett, MP PREMIER Dear Premier In accordance with the requirements of Section 36(1) of the State Service Act 2000 and Section 27 of the Financial Management and Audit Act 1990, I enclose for presentation to Parliament, the 2007-08 Annual Report of the Department of Premier and Cabinet. Yours sincerely Rhys Edwards Secretary 17 October 2008 The Department of Premier and Cabinet (DPAC) is a central agency of the Tasmanian State Government. The Department is responsible to the Premier and the Minister for Local Government as portfolio ministers, and also provides support to the Parliamentary Secretary and other members of Cabinet. The Department provides a broad range of services to the Cabinet, other members of Parliament, Government agencies and the community. The Department works closely with the public sector, the community, local government, the Australian Government and other state and territory governments. The Department also provides administration support to the State Service Commissioner and the Tasmania Together Progress Board, each of which is separately accountable and reports directly to Parliament. Department of Premier and Cabinet Annual Report 2007-08 2 Content Secretary’s Report 5 Departmental Overview 7 Governance 8 Activity Report 2007-08 12 Output Group 1 - Support for Executive Decision Making 13 Output 1.1: Strategic Policy and Advice 14 Output 1.2: Climate Change 18 Output 1.3: Social Inclusion 21 Output Group 2 - Government Processes and Services 23 Output 2.1: Management of Executive Government Processes
  • Tatz MIC Castan Essay Dec 2011

    Tatz MIC Castan Essay Dec 2011

    Indigenous Human Rights and History: occasional papers Series Editors: Lynette Russell, Melissa Castan The editors welcome written submissions writing on issues of Indigenous human rights and history. Please send enquiries including an abstract to arts- [email protected]. ISBN 978-0-9872391-0-5 Genocide in Australia: By Accident or Design? Colin Tatz © Indigenous Human Rights and History Vol 1(1). The essays in this series are fully refereed. Editorial committee: John Bradley, Melissa Castan, Stephen Gray, Zane Ma Rhea and Lynette Russell. Genocide in Australia: By Accident or Design? Colin Tatz © Colin Tatz 1 CONTENTS Editor’s Acknowledgements …… 3 Editor’s introduction …… 4 The Context …… 11 Australia and the Genocide Convention …… 12 Perceptions of the Victims …… 18 Killing Members of the Group …… 22 Protection by Segregation …… 29 Forcible Child Removals — the Stolen Generations …… 36 The Politics of Amnesia — Denialism …… 44 The Politics of Apology — Admissions, Regrets and Law Suits …… 53 Eyewitness Accounts — the Killings …… 58 Eyewitness Accounts — the Child Removals …… 68 Moving On, Moving From …… 76 References …… 84 Appendix — Some Known Massacre Sites and Dates …… 100 2 Acknowledgements The Editors would like to thank Dr Stephen Gray, Associate Professor John Bradley and Dr Zane Ma Rhea for their feedback on earlier versions of this essay. Myles Russell-Cook created the design layout and desk-top publishing. Financial assistance was generously provided by the Castan Centre for Human Rights Law and the School of Journalism, Australian and Indigenous Studies. 3 Editor’s introduction This essay is the first in a new series of scholarly discussion papers published jointly by the Monash Indigenous Centre and the Castan Centre for Human Rights Law.
  • THE HON. DAVID BARTLETT the MONA Effect

    THE HON. DAVID BARTLETT the MONA Effect

    THE HON. DAVID BARTLETT The MONA Effect: A Random Lightning Bolt of Weirdness or a Replicable Regional Renewal Plan? Friday, 1 March 2019 Edited transcript of keynote address at the Hunter Economic Breakfast Newcastle, Australia I want to give you some fast facts about Tasmania. Tasmania is the only place in the southern hemisphere that exports Fuji apples to Japan. You can buy them in Tokyo for $A250 each. It is the only place that exports tulips to Amsterdam and recently won the Amsterdam Tulip Prize. Ninety five per cent of the island’s energy is fully renewable. Until about five years ago, Tasmania provided about 85 per cent of all of Australia’s renewable energy. We have the cleanest air on the planet. At Cape Grim Weather Station they measure the particles of pollution per billion of air. It is the cleanest air on the planet. We produce, at Incat, 75 per cent of the world’s fast ferries. They come out of a factory in Hobart just down the river from MONA (the Museum of Old and New Art). Tasmania produces 100 per cent of the saffron grown in the southern hemisphere. There are more PhDs, per capita, living in Hobart than any other city in Australia. More people, per capita, put ‘artist’ on their tax return in Hobart than any other city in Australia. Four per cent of Australia’s rainfall falls on two per cent of its land mass; that is Tasmania. It is mostly on the west coast, with Hobart the driest capital in Australia.
  • Kingborough Council's Bruny Island Ragwort Program Review And

    Kingborough Council's Bruny Island Ragwort Program Review And

    Kingborough Council’s Bruny Island Ragwort Program Review and Action Plan An independent evaluation of the effectiveness and efficiency of Kingborough Council's ragwort management practices on Bruny Island May 2018 Beth Chamberlain [email protected] Telephone: 0400 641 46 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author acknowledges the generous assistance of the following people: Rene Raichert, Liz Quinn, Scott Corbett & Cara Broke (Kingborough Council); Kim (Alonnah Post Office); Anne (Bruny News); Karen Stuart (Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment); Richard Clarke & Trevor Adams (Bruny Island Primary Industries Group & Bruny Island Advisory Committee); Fran Davies (Bruny Island Community Association); Bob Graham & Daniel Sprod (Bruny Island Environment Network); Bernard Edwards & Scott Thornton (Tasmanian Parks & Wildlife Service); Kristen Dransfield (Sustainable Timbers Tasmania); Jill Jones (State Growth); James Gourlay (Crown Land Services); Richard Holloway (Consultant – Bio-control); Cassie Strain (Environmental Consultant); Ellen Davis (Tasmanian Farmers and Graziers Association); Phil Barker & Sue Jungalwalla (North Barker Ecosystem Services); Alison Hughes (Huon Valley Council); and the Bruny Island community. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 AIM 1 2 INTRODUCTION 1 2.1 Purpose of the Ragwort Review 1 2.2 Project Scope 2 2.3 Background 2 2.4 Compliance 2 2.5 Bruny Island - Geography 3 3 REVIEW METHOD 4 3.1 Guiding principles 4 4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 7 4.1 Kingborough Council’s Ragwort Management Program 7 4.1.1 Is eradication
  • Tasmania's Native Vegetation Policy

    Tasmania's Native Vegetation Policy

    TASMANIA’S NATIVE VEGETATION POLICY: TOWARDS AN INTEGRATED FRAMEWORK By STEPHEN HARRIS BSc (Hons), MSc Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Tasmania March 2011 i STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any University, and to the best of my knowledge, contains no copy or paraphrase of material previously written or published by any other person except where due reference is given in the text. Stephen Harris University of Tasmania HOBART March 2011 ii STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY OF ACCESS This thesis is not to be made available for loan or copying for two years following the date this statement was signed. Following that time the thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. Stephen Harris University of Tasmania HOBART March 2011 iii STATEMENT OF CO-AUTHORSHIP The following people and institutions contributed to the publication of the work undertaken as part of this thesis: Harris, Shaw and Crane (2009) on ex situ conservation planning for Tasmania. S. Harris (60%), J. Shaw, University of Stellenbosch (25%) and N. Crane, Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment (15%) Details of authors’ roles: S. Harris made key contribution to the formulation and development of the idea, sourced relevant data and information, and directed and led the preparation and refinement of initial and successive drafts. J. Shaw contributed to the development of the paper, sourced some data on threatened species and provided input on the early drafts of the paper.
  • 19Th February, 2010 Bruce Taylor Tasmanian Electoral Commissioner

    19Th February, 2010 Bruce Taylor Tasmanian Electoral Commissioner

    19th February, 2010 Bruce Taylor Tasmanian Electoral Commissioner GPO Box 300 HOBART, Tasmania 7001 [email protected] Electoral Act 2004, Section 191 – Electoral matter on the Internet Dear Bruce, The enacting and subsequent promise to repeal a section of electoral law in South Australia this year has brought attention to the fact that Tasmania has a similar regulation regarding electoral matter on the Internet. As you are aware, section 191 of the Electoral Act 2004 requires that any electoral content be authorised with name and address information. We the undersigned request that this section of law not to be enforced in relation to this election and for a review to be undertaken by the new parliament at its earliest convenience. No public interest would be served by enforcement of this law. Whilst section 191 has been in force during a previous state election, new social networking tools such as Blogs, Facebook and Twitter to name a few have risen to prominence and are used on a daily basis by thousands in Tasmania including political parties. These technologies present new challenges to compliance and enforcement. The definition of electoral matter is so broad that any mention of the election could be construed to fall under this definition. If you are unable to assure the public that this section will not be enforced, we believe that the public will: - Refuse to post about the election on the Internet, stifling legitimate debate, - Follow the letter of the law and proceed to publish their name with electoral matter which opens them up to a range of privacy infringements including physical or employment threats as well as identity fraud, or - Simply disregard the law requiring them to put their name and address to any “electoral matter” online.