DOCSLIB.ORG

Tasmania's Native Vegetation Policy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tasmania's Native Vegetation Policy TASMANIA’S NATIVE VEGETATION POLICY: TOWARDS AN INTEGRATED FRAMEWORK By STEPHEN HARRIS BSc (Hons), MSc Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Tasmania March 2011 i STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any University, and to the best of my knowledge, contains no copy or paraphrase of material previously written or published by any other person except where due reference is given in the text. Stephen Harris University of Tasmania HOBART March 2011 ii STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY OF ACCESS This thesis is not to be made available for loan or copying for two years following the date this statement was signed. Following that time the thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. Stephen Harris University of Tasmania HOBART March 2011 iii STATEMENT OF CO-AUTHORSHIP The following people and institutions contributed to the publication of the work undertaken as part of this thesis: Harris, Shaw and Crane (2009) on ex situ conservation planning for Tasmania. S. Harris (60%), J. Shaw, University of Stellenbosch (25%) and N. Crane, Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment (15%) Details of authors’ roles: S. Harris made key contribution to the formulation and development of the idea, sourced relevant data and information, and directed and led the preparation and refinement of initial and successive drafts. J. Shaw contributed to the development of the paper, sourced some data on threatened species and provided input on the early drafts of the paper. N. Crane assisted S. Harris in preparing an early draft and locating some literature references. Paper by Harris, Allen, Baker, Bird, Bowman, Connolly, d'Arville, Harwood, Rozefelds and Wardlaw (1991) on guidelines for collecting dendrochronology samples from Tasmanian public reserves. S. Harris (45%), K. Allen, Monash University (6%); P. Baker, Monash University (6%); T. Bird (6%); D. Bowman, University of Tasmania (6%); A. Connolly, Environment Protection Authority Queensland (6%); L. d'Arville (6%); C. Harwood, CSIRO (6%); A. Rozefelds, Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery (6%); T. Wardlaw, Forestry Tasmania (6%). Details of authors’ roles: S. Harris defined the problem, scoped the required elements of the paper, prepared an early draft of the paper with assistance of A. Connolly, chaired a half day workshop of specialists, synthesised relevant conclusions from the workshop, led the refinement of successive drafts of the manuscript and designed the decision tree with assistance (mainly formatting) from L. d'Arville. iv K. Allen, P. Baker, T. Bird, D. Bowman, C. Harwood, A. Rozefelds and T. Wardlaw contributed comments from various specialist perspectives in a workshop and subsequently commented on drafts of the paper. A. Connolly assisted in preparing an early rough draft of the paper and locating some literature references. L. d'Arville assisted in formatting the decision tree and preparing the final paper for submission. We the undersigned agree with the above stated "proportion of work undertaken" for each of the above published peer-reviewed manuscripts contributing to this thesis. Signed:.......................................... ............................................................ Associate Professor Kate Crowley Associate Professor Marcus Haward Supervisor Supervisor School of Government School of Government University of Tasmania University of Tasmania Date.......................................... ....................................................... v GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS ABIF Australian Biological Information Facility ABRS Australian Biological Resources Study ACF Advocacy Coalition Framework AFS Australian Forestry Standard ANZECC Australian New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council (replaced by the Natural Resource Management Ministerial Council in 2001 BDAC Biological Diversity Advisory Council BIOSIRT Biosecurity Surveillance Incident Response and Tracing CAPAD Conservation and Protected Areas Database CAR Comprehensive, Adequate and Representative CARSAG Comprehensive, Adequate and Representative Scientific Advisory Group CBD Convention on Biological Diversity CEPA Communication, Education and Public Awareness CERF Commonwealth Environmental Research Facilities CFOC Caring for our Country CITES Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora COAG Council of Australian Governments CLAC Crown Land Assessment Committee CMA Catchment Management Authority CSIRO Commonwealth Scientific Industrial Research Organisation DAFF Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry vi DEWHA Department of Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts DIISR Department of Innovation, Industry Science and Research DPIPWE Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment EA Environment Australia (now the Department of Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts) ENGO Environmental Non-Government Agency EPBC Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 ERHOA Environment and Resources Heads of Agency ESCAVI Executive Steering Committee on Australian Vegetation Information ESD Ecological Sustainable Development FPP Forest Practices Plan GBIF Global Biological Information Facility GIS Geographic Information System GMO Genetically modified organism GSPC Global Strategy for Plant Conservation IBRA Interim Biogeographic Regionalisation of Australia ICM Integrated Catchment Management IGAE Inter-governmental Agreement on the Environment ISO1401 International Standard: Environmental Management System JANIS Joint ANZECC/MCFA National Forest Policy Statement Implementation Sub-committee LUPA Land Use Planning and Approvals Act 1993. LWRRDC Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation vii M&E Monitoring and Evaluation MCFFA Ministerial Council on Forestry, Fisheries and Agriculture MERI Monitoring and Evaluation Resource Indicator NCRIS National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy NFI National Forest Inventory NGO Non-Government Organisation NEPI New Environmental Policy Instruments NHT Natural Heritage Trust NLWRA National Land and Water Resources Audit NPWS National Parks and Wildlife Service NRM Natural Resource Management NRMMC Natural Resource Management Ministerial Council NRNGA Natural Resource New Governance Arrangements NRS National Reserve System NVF Native Vegetation Framework NVIS Native Vegetation Information System OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development PAMA Public Authority Management Agreement PFT Private Forests Tasmania PI photo interpretation RAMSAR Convention on Wetlands of International Importance especially as Waterfowl Habitat (initiated at Ramsar in Iran) RFA Regional Forest Agreement viii RMPS Resource Management Planning System RPDC Resource Planning and Development Commission RTBG Royal Tasmanian Botanical Gardens SOE State of Environment SOF State of Forests TAC Tasmanian Aboriginal Centre TASVEG Tasmanian Vegetation map TASVEG VCA Vegetation Condition Assessment based on the Tasmanian Vegetation map TERN Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network TLC Tasmanian Land Conservancy UNCED United Nations Conference on Environment and Development UNESCO United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organisation VMA Vegetation Management Act WHA World Heritage Area ix ABSTRACT Vegetation policy initiatives were rare throughout much of Tasmania‘s European history until the 1970s. Evidence of policy learning was even rarer, and no substantial policy framework existed until the proclamation of the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1970. This was the chief instrument until it was eclipsed in importance for vegetation management in 1997 by the Regional Forest Agreement. Although developed to support a sustainable forest industry, it has developed a wider importance as the principal de facto vegetation policy framework, arguably overshadowing the importance of other Acts and policies. Evaluation and learning mechanisms are built into the Regional Forest Agreement and episodic improvements at the policy level have been demonstrated as a result. Both these instruments however, are considered to fall short of a comprehensively articulated development of vegetation policy because of gaps and the limitations of their particular perspectives. From the 1980s, following the strengthening of Commonwealth control over natural resources, most policy initiatives in vegetation have originated at the national level. The state has been responsive to these initiatives developed sometimes bilaterally with the Commonwealth or often multilaterally with other states and territories and the Commonwealth. National obligations under international agreements have been the eventual impetus for a wide range of actions at the state level. While Commonwealth and state policy objectives have tended to converge, there is still a poorly coordinated policy pathway from state government level to local government and Natural Resource Management (NRM) regional bodies. The national agenda-setting over the last two decades has resulted in some policy gaps at the state level. A sub-optimal policy and process milieu exists for dealing with many vegetation issues. There has also been the construction of an excessively intricate administrative and policy delivery framework. The small size of the state and its bureaucracy, and close professional relationships of some of the actors, may have benefited
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Uncorrected Proof Issue
    UNCORRECTED PROOF ISSUE Tuesday 24 June 2008 - Estimates Committee B (Bartlett) - Part 1 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ESTIMATES COMMITTEE B Tuesday 24 June 2008 MEMBERS Mr Dean Mr Finch Mr Wing Mrs Jamieson Mrs Rattray-Wagner (Chair) Ms Ritchie SUBSTITUTE MEMBERS IN ATTENDANCE Hon. David Bartlett, Premier; Minister for Education and Skills; Minister for Workplace Relations Department of Premier and Cabinet Greg Johannes, Executive Director Marguerite Scott, Director, Community Development Rhys Edwards, Secretary Rebekah Burton, Deputy Secretary Phil Foulston, Director, Executive Division Anna Cuthbertson, Executive Officer Jeff Reeve, Acting Director, Corporate Services Peter Wright, Manager, Finance Frank Ogle, Director, Public Sector Management Office John McCormick, Director, Policy Jamie Bayly-Stark, Director, Policy Phil Hoysted, Director, Tasmania Together Progress Board Mellissa Astinakis, Director, Social Inclusion Unit Hayden Jones, Project Manager Estimates B 1 24 June 2008 UNCORRECTED PROOF ISSUE Department of Justice Lisa Hutton, Secretary Brian Smith, Deputy Secretary Michael Stevens, Deputy Secretary Peter Fischer, State Planning Adviser Roy Ormerod, General Manager, Workplace Standards Department of Education John Smyth, Secretary Greg Glass, Deputy Secretary, Corporate Services Jenny Gale, General Manager, Strategic Policy and Performance Liz Banks, General Manager, Learning Services North-West Lynne James, Manager, State Programs - Students Andrew Finch, Director, Finance, Facilities and Business Support Sue Kennedy, Manager,
    [Show full text]
  • David Bartlett, MP PREMIER Dear Premier in Accordance with The
    David Bartlett, MP PREMIER Dear Premier In accordance with the requirements of Section 36(1) of the State Service Act 2000 and Section 27 of the Financial Management and Audit Act 1990, I enclose for presentation to Parliament, the 2007-08 Annual Report of the Department of Premier and Cabinet. Yours sincerely Rhys Edwards Secretary 17 October 2008 The Department of Premier and Cabinet (DPAC) is a central agency of the Tasmanian State Government. The Department is responsible to the Premier and the Minister for Local Government as portfolio ministers, and also provides support to the Parliamentary Secretary and other members of Cabinet. The Department provides a broad range of services to the Cabinet, other members of Parliament, Government agencies and the community. The Department works closely with the public sector, the community, local government, the Australian Government and other state and territory governments. The Department also provides administration support to the State Service Commissioner and the Tasmania Together Progress Board, each of which is separately accountable and reports directly to Parliament. Department of Premier and Cabinet Annual Report 2007-08 2 Content Secretary’s Report 5 Departmental Overview 7 Governance 8 Activity Report 2007-08 12 Output Group 1 - Support for Executive Decision Making 13 Output 1.1: Strategic Policy and Advice 14 Output 1.2: Climate Change 18 Output 1.3: Social Inclusion 21 Output Group 2 - Government Processes and Services 23 Output 2.1: Management of Executive Government Processes
    [Show full text]
  • THE HON. DAVID BARTLETT the MONA Effect
    THE HON. DAVID BARTLETT The MONA Effect: A Random Lightning Bolt of Weirdness or a Replicable Regional Renewal Plan? Friday, 1 March 2019 Edited transcript of keynote address at the Hunter Economic Breakfast Newcastle, Australia I want to give you some fast facts about Tasmania. Tasmania is the only place in the southern hemisphere that exports Fuji apples to Japan. You can buy them in Tokyo for $A250 each. It is the only place that exports tulips to Amsterdam and recently won the Amsterdam Tulip Prize. Ninety five per cent of the island’s energy is fully renewable. Until about five years ago, Tasmania provided about 85 per cent of all of Australia’s renewable energy. We have the cleanest air on the planet. At Cape Grim Weather Station they measure the particles of pollution per billion of air. It is the cleanest air on the planet. We produce, at Incat, 75 per cent of the world’s fast ferries. They come out of a factory in Hobart just down the river from MONA (the Museum of Old and New Art). Tasmania produces 100 per cent of the saffron grown in the southern hemisphere. There are more PhDs, per capita, living in Hobart than any other city in Australia. More people, per capita, put ‘artist’ on their tax return in Hobart than any other city in Australia. Four per cent of Australia’s rainfall falls on two per cent of its land mass; that is Tasmania. It is mostly on the west coast, with Hobart the driest capital in Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2007-08
    Annual Report 2007-08 Department of Premier and Cabinet © Crown in the Right of the State of Tasmania 2008 For copies or further information regarding this annual report please contact: Department of Premier and Cabinet GPO Box 123 HOBART Tasmania 7001 Phone: (03) 6233 3738 Fax: (03) 6233 2769 Email: [email protected] Website: www.dpac.tas.gov.au ISSN 1448 9023 (print) ISSN 1448 9031 (online) This report is printed on carbon neutral paper Department of Premier and Cabinet GPO Box 123 HOBART TAS 7001 Phone: (03) 6233 3738 Fax: (03) 6233 2769 Email: [email protected] Website: www.dpac.tas.gov.au David Bartlett, MP PREMIER Dear Premier In accordance with the requirements of Section 36(1) of the State Service Act 2000 and Section 27 of the Financial Management and Audit Act 1990, I enclose for presentation to Parliament, the 2007-08 Annual Report of the Department of Premier and Cabinet. Yours sincerely Rhys Edwards Secretary 17 October 2008 The Department of Premier and Cabinet (DPAC) is a central agency of the Tasmanian State Government. The Department is responsible to the Premier and the Minister for Local Government as portfolio ministers, and also provides support to the Parliamentary Secretary and other members of Cabinet. The Department provides a broad range of services to the Cabinet, other members of Parliament, Government agencies and the community. The Department works closely with the public sector, the community, local government, the Australian Government and other state and territory governments. The Department also provides administration support to the State Service Commissioner and the Tasmania Together Progress Board, each of which is separately accountable and reports directly to Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • 19Th February, 2010 Bruce Taylor Tasmanian Electoral Commissioner
    19th February, 2010 Bruce Taylor Tasmanian Electoral Commissioner GPO Box 300 HOBART, Tasmania 7001 [email protected] Electoral Act 2004, Section 191 – Electoral matter on the Internet Dear Bruce, The enacting and subsequent promise to repeal a section of electoral law in South Australia this year has brought attention to the fact that Tasmania has a similar regulation regarding electoral matter on the Internet. As you are aware, section 191 of the Electoral Act 2004 requires that any electoral content be authorised with name and address information. We the undersigned request that this section of law not to be enforced in relation to this election and for a review to be undertaken by the new parliament at its earliest convenience. No public interest would be served by enforcement of this law. Whilst section 191 has been in force during a previous state election, new social networking tools such as Blogs, Facebook and Twitter to name a few have risen to prominence and are used on a daily basis by thousands in Tasmania including political parties. These technologies present new challenges to compliance and enforcement. The definition of electoral matter is so broad that any mention of the election could be construed to fall under this definition. If you are unable to assure the public that this section will not be enforced, we believe that the public will: - Refuse to post about the election on the Internet, stifling legitimate debate, - Follow the letter of the law and proceed to publish their name with electoral matter which opens them up to a range of privacy infringements including physical or employment threats as well as identity fraud, or - Simply disregard the law requiring them to put their name and address to any “electoral matter” online.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2009–10
    Annual Report 2009–10 David Bartlett, MP PREMIER Dear Premier In accordance with the requirements of Section 36(1) of the State Service Act 2000 and Section 27 of the Financial Management and Audit Act 1990, I enclose for presentation to parliament the 2009-10 Annual Report of the Department of Premier and Cabinet. Yours sincerely Rhys Edwards Secretary 9 October 2010 Department of Premier and Cabinet - Annual Report 2009-10 1 The Department of Premier and Cabinet is a central agency of the Tasmanian State Government. The Ministers to whom the department is responsible are the Premier, and the Minister for Innovation, Science and Technology, Hon David Bartlett MP, the Minister for Local Government and the Minister for Veterans’ Affairs, Hon Bryan Green MP, the Minister for Children, Hon Lin Thorp MLC, and the Minister for Community Development and the Minister for Climate Change, Hon Nick McKim MP. The department also supports the Secretary to Cabinet, Cassy O’Connor MP, who has been authorised to undertake administrative functions related to the Community Development Division’s Disability Bureau, Multicultural Tasmania, Seniors Bureau and Women Tasmania on behalf of the Minister for Community Development. The department provides a broad range of services to the Cabinet, other members of parliament, government agencies and the community. The department works closely with the public sector, the community, local government, the Australian Government and other state and territory governments. The department also provides administrative support to the State Service Commissioner and the Tasmania Together Progress Board, each of which is separately accountable and reports directly to parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • Paradoxes of Protection Evolution of the Tasmanian Parks and Wildlife Service and National Parks and Reserved Lands System
    Paradoxes of Protection Evolution of the Tasmanian Parks and Wildlife Service and National Parks and Reserved Lands System By Dr Louise Crossley May 2009 A Report for Senator Christine Milne www.christinemilne.org.au Australian Greens Cover image: Lake Gwendolen from the track to the summit of Frenchmans Cap, Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area Photo: Matt Newton Photography Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................. 1 1. THE INITIAL ESTABLISHMENT OF PARKS AND RESERVES; UTILITARIANS VERSUS CONSERVATIONISTS 1915-1970....................................................................... 3 1.1 The Scenery Preservation Board as the first manager of reserved lands ............................................................ 3 1.2 Extension of the reserved lands system ................................................................................................................... 3 1.3The wilderness value of wasteland ........................................................................................................................... 4 1.4 Inadequacies of the Scenery Protection Board ...................................................................................................... 4 2. THE ESTABLISHMENT AND ‘GLORY DAYS’ OF THE NATIONAL PARKS AND WILDLIFE SERVICE 1971-81 ........................................................................................... 6 2.1 The demise of the Scenery Preservation Board and the Lake Pedder controversy
    [Show full text]
  • June 2006 (PDF 3.8MB)
    NEWS ALUMNIIssue 30 • June 2006 UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA Delivering more than ever Providing mail room solutions for the University of Tasmania. Aus post uni page.indd 1 17/5/06 9:59:55 AM From the Vice-Chancellor As we reach the crest of the year, we find ourselves in challenging education waters. But UTAS has never been one to shy from a challenge. And we head into this uncharted territory with two new captains at the State and Federal education helms. Distinctiveness in the Education sector has become a federal catchcry, and in this regard we at UTAS are following a similar agenda to our new Federal minister, the Hon Julie Bishop. We continue to hone in on our strengths and the distinguishing features that make this university unique. At the State level, the Hon David Bartlett, was re-elected and elevated into the cabinet as the state’s new education champion. David is ‘one of our own’ – he majored in science at UTAS – and it seems fitting to have one of our graduates take on Education in Tasmania. He has been a constant friend and supporter of the University, and we look forward to taking the State Government Partnership to new levels with him. Research is reshaping the priorities of the entire tertiary education sector. At UTAS, we are well-placed to respond to the confronting research environment that is just round the corner. We are among the top ten research universities in Australia, and have had our research favourably examined by national and international experts. Our leading separation scientist, Professor Paul Haddad, has just been awarded the highest research accolade in the country – a Federation Fellowship.
    [Show full text]
  • Structure and Ideology in the Tasmanian Labor Party
    Structure and Ideology in the Tasmanian Labor Party: Postmaterialism and Party change ,- By Peter James Patmore LL.B., Dip. Crim. Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements fo r the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Tasmania, March 2000 II This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for a degree or diploma by the University or any other institution, except by way of background information and duly acknowledged in the thesis, and to the best of my knowledge and belief no material previously pubJished or written by another person except where due acknowledgment is made in the text ofthe thesis. ................�................. �---=;,.......... Peter Patmore 23" February 2000. III This thesis is not to be made available for loan or copying for two years fo llowing the date this statement is signed. Following that time the thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. Peter Pa tmore 23'" February 2000 iv ABSTRACT The Tasmanian Labor Party has found itself, like many western social democratic parties, recently subject to challenge; not from its traditional enemy, the economic right, but froma new postmaterialist left. This thesis considers the concept of postmaterialism, its rise and role in the fo rmation of new ecocentric political parties, and its impact on the structure, ideology and electoral strategy of the Tasmanian Labor Party. Maurice Duverger's typology of political parties has been used to elucidate and consider the characteristics and fo rmation of political parties and the importance of electoral systems - particularly proportional representation - in achieving representational success.
    [Show full text]
  • Inaugural Speech – Felix Ashton Ellis MP
    Terry Martin MLC Legislative Council Date: 18 May 2004 Electorate: Elwick FORMER PREMIER, JIM BACON Mr AIRD (Derwent - Leader of the Government in the Council - Motion) - Mr President, I move – That the Legislative Council places on record its deep appreciation to the former Premier, Jim Bacon, for his outstanding contribution to the Tasmanian people as a member of parliament from 1996 until 2004, as Leader of the Parliamentary Labor Party from 1997 to 2004 and as Premier of the State from 1998 to 2004. The Legislative Council pays tribute to a great Tasmanian, and wishes him and his wife Honey the very best for the future. Mr PRESIDENT - The question is that the motion be agreed to. The honourable member for Elwick has the call and as this is the honourable member's inaugural speech, I know that all honourable members will extend to him the usual courtesies. Mr MARTIN (Elwick - Inaugural) - Mr President, I do understand that it is normal practice for new members to give themselves at least a few days to settle in before making their inaugural speech and when they do so, it is quite normal to talk about what motivated them to stand for the Legislative Council and what they hope to achieve. However, I have found myself in somewhat of a predicament for when I realised that this motion was before the Council I felt that I simply would not be able to sit there without commenting on this motion in order to place on record not only my enormous respect for Jim Bacon and my gratitude for the contribution he has made to the State but also to express the heartfelt respect and gratitude of the majority of my constituents.
    [Show full text]
  • Gunns' Proposed Tamar Valley Pulp
    GUNNS’ PROPOSED TAMAR VALLEY PULP MILL SAGA: Timeline of Key Events: 2003 - 2017 The saga of the pulp mill began in June 2003 with then Deputy Premier Paul Lennon spotted having dinner with John Gay, CEO of Gunns Limited, with documents sighted on the table which referred to a proposal to build a pulp mill. Following that revelation both the State and Federal Labor and Liberal parties were in lock-step support for the pulp mill despite growing community outrage and dissent. Below are a few key ‘highlights’ over the last 14 years that the toxic pulp mill cloud has hung over Tasmania, blighting Tasmanian politics, community, and reputation. ▪ June 2003 – Gunns’ intentions for a pulp mill were leaked to then-Greens Leader Peg Putt, who subsequently ‘blew the whistle’ on the plans by raising the matter in the State Parliament. ▪ November 2003 - guidelines for the mill were released by the government. ▪ June 2004 – revised environmental guidelines for a pulp mill in Tasmania released. ▪ June 2004 – Media reports that “Prime Minister John Howard has promised $5 million to Tasmanian timber giant Gunns Ltd if it goes ahead with its proposed $1 billion pulp mill.” ▪ August 2004 – Lennon Labor government announced that a pulp mill “co-ordinating unit” would be housed within the Department of Economic Development. The Unit would be headed by Mr Bob Gordon, formerly the Forestry Tasmania General Manager of Marketing, and would be known as the Pulp Mill Taskforce. ▪ November 2004 – Premier Lennon announces the Gunns’ pulp mill proposal to be assessed as a Project of State Significance under the State Policies and Projects Act 1993 (at Gunns Ltd’s request), ▪ November 2004 – also revealed that Forestry Tasmania and Gunns Ltd had entered into a pulp mill wood supply agreement before any pulp mill plans were made public.
    [Show full text]
  • Firearms Legislation & Policy
    HOUSE OF ASSEMBLY SELECT COMMITTEE FIREARMS LEGISLATION AND POLICY Submission by: Ronald Cornish Tel: BACKGROUND: In 1996 I was a Minister in the Rundle Government, responsible for the introduction of Firearm Law Reform agreed to by the Federal Government and all State and Territory Governments in Australia, in the form of the National Firearms Agreement (NFA). As Leader of the House of Assembly, I was part of the negotiating team of Messrs Tony Rundle (Premier), John Beswick (Responsible Minister), Michael Field (Leader of the Opposition) and Christine Milne (Leader of the Greens), which agreed to the National Firearms Agreement provisions and passed them through the House of Assembly without amendment. In preparing this submission, I consulted John Beswick, the responsible Minister for carriage of the legislation, who provided me with the following information (comments) which I believe to be very relevant and provides the background to the introduction of the Rundle Government’s Firearm Law Reforms: - “While John Howard is rightly given a lot of the credit for leading the charge and being very strong in insisting that the integrity of the proposed legislation was not compromised, the actual form of the legislation was thrashed out by the State Ministers and Attorneys General in several meetings which I attended on behalf of Tasmania. The first meeting was attended by the Prime Minister and Tony Rundle as Premier of Tasmania, but no other Premiers attended. John Howard had spoken to them beforehand and got them to agree to what he wanted to do. There was another meeting at which John Howard intervened to ensure that a particular proposal, that would have weakened the legislation, was not adopted.
    [Show full text]