Guide to the Pergamon Museum

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Guide to the Pergamon Museum HE PERGAMON MUSEUM which was built according lan 'ritz f u e e to the p of Wol f, nd r the sup rvision of e u 1 8 a e 1 8 . Max Hasak , was b g n in 97 , nd finish d in 99 1 0 1 It was not, however, until the end of the year 9 , that r the collection was completely arranged . The pu pose which governed the plan of the Museum was the erec tion of a building in which the frieze of the Great Altar e e of P rgamon might find , as nearly as possibl , its original setting and light . The result is a large rectangular room e ea with the Great Altar in the middl , l ving a broad passage for the inspection of the frieze as well as of the statues and important inscriptions set up along the out . e rm side wall The spac within the altar, fo s a room of great altitude especially adapted to the exhibition of e e ce architectural exampl s , where ar pla d not only frag a ments of the most import nt buildings of Pergamon , but also those from Priene and Magnesia on the Maeander . O ller River utside this room is another broad ga y, e a a e a corr sponding to the pass ge bov , cont ining other i me i important statues and inscript ons from the sa cit es, for which there is not space in the chief colle ctions already mentioned . It is accessible to persons making a e D rect r sp cial study of the subject, by applying to the i o 6 s f of the Museum . A cla sified collection o isolated frag ments and less significant inscriptions is set up in the basement below . Thus the produ cts of the excavations conducted by a e l h e c the Roy l Museums of B r in, in t ree H llenisti cities e u e of Asia Minor ar found in this M s um , with the exception of the antiquities from Pergamon and Prien e which are more fitti ngly exhibited in the collection of antiquities . E N THE HISTOR' O'P RGAMO . Pergamon is situ ated in Asia Minor about 1 8 miles inland from the west coast . It lies opposite the Island Le e of sbos , almost half way between Smyrna on th south, and Troy on the north . The citadel at Troy where e e e s e Schli mann mad his xcavations , called al o in th e e e u e l g nd P rgamon, the b rg or citad l , must not be con fused with this Pergamon which was the capital of the Attalid dynasty from the middle of the third century until 1 33 before Christ . e e The old fortifi d settlement , scarc ly mentioned in e e u anci nt history , lay on th top of a mountain abo t 2 50 meters above the present town of Bergama . The mountain was accessible from the south and commanded a broad view of the Kaiko s Valley . K L simacho s It was on this height that ing y , one of e A e e the succ ssors of l xander th Great, deposited a store of treasure under the protection of Philetairo s a com mander of mercenary tr00ps . Having preserved the treas ure through the period of war and disturbance which Philetairo s s e followed , made himself ma ter of the fortr ss as as t well its weal h, and through the skilful use of the e u e e latter, won for himself and his successors gr at infl nc an d Phi tair extensive possessions . le o s was succeeded by his ’ — I 2 6 2 1 . brother s son , Eumenes ( 3 4 B C ) who , in was Attalo s e turn, followed by I, the son of anoth r e Phil etai broth r of ro s . H s or of Per amon 8 i t y g . — Attal s 2 . o I ( 4 1 1 97 B C . ) established the fame of his house by his successfu l conflicts with the Syrian e e e kings and his victory ov r th Gauls , whose hord s in A e A sia Minor were looked upon as invincibl . s outward a s me e mark of his powerful military position , he s u d th title of King and provided for the perpetuation of his ee e e e e me e d ds by th r ction of gr at monu nts . Th much mutilated bases of these commemorative battle-monu m e a e r e e e e ents, with th ir fr gm ntary insc iptions ar pr s rv d in this Museum ; the bronze statu es themselves are no t - x extant . The well known marble statue of The dying ' ' e e m me e ea Gaul in th Capitoline Mus u at Ro , giv s an id e e e t A of th styl and b au y of these lost statu es . ttalos e s s joined th Romans in their first conte ts in the Ea t, within the last decade of his reign . He also took an a e e ee e ctiv part in th war complications in Gr c , and it e e was there , as the first coll ctor of whom we hav any e e e knowledge , that he procur d the art tr asur s for his e in capital . The Mus um has testimony of these works the inscription -bearing bases of statues which were taken ee m e w s from Gr ce to Perga on , the works of r no ned artist of the fifth and fourth centuries before Christ. Of the building activity of Attalo s there remains no positive e evidence , though it is probable that th extension of the wall of the town about half way down the side of e e e . the mountain , took plac und r his r ign — 1 . e Eumenes II . ( 1 97 5 9 B the son and succ ssor Attalo s e e e e e of , und r whose rul P rgamon becam th A me capital of almost all sia Minor , followed the sa political policy as his father . The town now extended to the foot of the mountain and was surrounded by a strong wall . H r o is to y f Perg amon . 9 Eumenes built the most splendid monuments of which m the a ' A we have any re ains , Great Alt r of eus and thena its e e e with rich frieze , and th stat ly stoa or colonnad which enclosed the sacred precinct of Athena and com c muni ated with the famous library of Pergamon . Some of the most beautiful statues and the most im e e e e portant in th history of art, now in th Mus um, onc . ' m e decorated this library ro th statues of noted authors , e m the which also stood in th library , there re ain only fragments of the pedestals with the names incised . Eumenes H . also erected victory monuments like those Attal s . of o I . as the inscriptions in the collection testify Eumenes was followed by his brother Attal os II . — 1 1 8 . e ( 59 3 B C ) who before he cam to the throne , ed - d icated the semi circular marble seat, now outside the entrance to the Museum . A — t 1 . B Next came t alo s III . ( 38 1 33 B C ) son of umen es 11. who bequeathed his kingdom to the Romans . An inscription in the Museum gives an interesting decree the e of people , after the death of th king , before the ‘ had Romans taken possession of the heritage . Under e Roman rule , Pergamon spread out in th plain to the e e T west, b yond the boundary of th present urkish settle ment . That the site of the old capital was not yet aban do ned rf e , is shown by the powe ul r mains of the Trajan temple on a commanding point of the height, the gym nasiu m built in the time of Hadrian on a terrace half e way down th slope, and still farther proof , is the - restoration to the honor of Caracalla , of a half des tro ed h y temple of the time of the kings . T is temple stood above on the slope of the Acropolis near the theatre . The Ex cava ons ti . We know very little about the vicissitudes of the in z e an d . Let city , the By antin Turkish periods it suffice, that the inhabited quarter of the old town on the moun tain grew narrower and narrower until under Turkish was e rule it ntirely deserted , while in the plain there rose again out of the ruin a flourishing settlement . To the different fortifications behind which the inhabitants e v tried to protect thems l es , belongs a strong wall of in defence, probably built the eighth century to keep back on- the pressing Mohammedans . This wall was built chiefly from the parts of the magnificent old structures e which r mained there , until brought to light by the Prussian excavations . ' E CA'ATIONS . 1 8 In 7 3 , Carl Humann sent the first pieces of the frieze from the Pergamon citadel to Berlin, a gift which gave the impulse to the Prussian excavations .
Recommended publications
  • Seven Churches of Revelation Turkey
    TRAVEL GUIDE SEVEN CHURCHES OF REVELATION TURKEY TURKEY Pergamum Lesbos Thyatira Sardis Izmir Chios Smyrna Philadelphia Samos Ephesus Laodicea Aegean Sea Patmos ASIA Kos 1 Rhodes ARCHEOLOGICAL MAP OF WESTERN TURKEY BULGARIA Sinanköy Manya Mt. NORTH EDİRNE KIRKLARELİ Selimiye Fatih Iron Foundry Mosque UNESCO B L A C K S E A MACEDONIA Yeni Saray Kırklareli Höyük İSTANBUL Herakleia Skotoussa (Byzantium) Krenides Linos (Constantinople) Sirra Philippi Beikos Palatianon Berge Karaevlialtı Menekşe Çatağı Prusias Tauriana Filippoi THRACE Bathonea Küçükyalı Ad hypium Morylos Dikaia Heraion teikhos Achaeology Edessa Neapolis park KOCAELİ Tragilos Antisara Abdera Perinthos Basilica UNESCO Maroneia TEKİRDAĞ (İZMİT) DÜZCE Europos Kavala Doriskos Nicomedia Pella Amphipolis Stryme Işıklar Mt. ALBANIA Allante Lete Bormiskos Thessalonica Argilos THE SEA OF MARMARA SAKARYA MACEDONIANaoussa Apollonia Thassos Ainos (ADAPAZARI) UNESCO Thermes Aegae YALOVA Ceramic Furnaces Selectum Chalastra Strepsa Berea Iznik Lake Nicea Methone Cyzicus Vergina Petralona Samothrace Parion Roman theater Acanthos Zeytinli Ada Apamela Aisa Ouranopolis Hisardere Dasaki Elimia Pydna Barçın Höyük BTHYNIA Galepsos Yenibademli Höyük BURSA UNESCO Antigonia Thyssus Apollonia (Prusa) ÇANAKKALE Manyas Zeytinlik Höyük Arisbe Lake Ulubat Phylace Dion Akrothooi Lake Sane Parthenopolis GÖKCEADA Aktopraklık O.Gazi Külliyesi BİLECİK Asprokampos Kremaste Daskyleion UNESCO Höyük Pythion Neopolis Astyra Sundiken Mts. Herakleum Paşalar Sarhöyük Mount Athos Achmilleion Troy Pessinus Potamia Mt.Olympos
    [Show full text]
  • A Literary Sources
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-82860-4 — The Hellenistic World from Alexander to the Roman Conquest 2nd Edition Index More Information Index A Literary sources Livy XXVI.24.7–15: 77 (a); XXIX.12.11–16: 80; XXXI.44.2–9: 11 Aeschines III.132–4: 82; XXXIII.38: 195; XXXVII.40–1: Appian, Syrian Wars 52–5, 57–8, 62–3: 203; XXXVIII.34: 87; 57 XXXIX.24.1–4: 89; XLI.20: 209 (b); ‘Aristeas to Philocrates’ I.9–11 and XLII.29–30.7: 92; XLII.51: 94; 261 V.35–40: XLV.29.3–30 and 32.1–7: 96 15 [Aristotle] Oeconomica II.2.33: I Maccabees 1.1–9: 24; 1.10–25 and 5 7 Arrian, Alexander I.17: ; II.14: ; 41–56: 217; 15.1–9: 221 8 9 III.1.5–2.2: (a); III.3–4: ; II Maccabees 3.1–3: 216 12 13 IV.10.5–12.5: ; V.28–29.1: ; Memnon, FGrH 434 F 11 §§5.7–11: 159 14 20 V1.27.3–5: ; VII.1.1–4: ; Menander, The Sicyonian lines 3–15: 104 17 18 VII.4.4–5: ; VII.8–9 and 11: Menecles of Barca FGrHist 270F9:322 26 Arrian, FGrH 156 F 1, §§1–8: (a); F 9, Pausanias I.7: 254; I.9.4: 254; I.9.5–10: 30 §§34–8: 56; I.25.3–6: 28; VII.16.7–17.1: Athenaeus, Deipnosophistae V.201b–f, 100 258 43 202f–203e: ; VI.253b–f: Plutarch, Agis 5–6.1 and 7.5–8: 69 23 Augustine, City of God 4.4: Alexander 10.6–11: 3 (a); 15: 4 (a); Demetrius of Phalerum, FGrH 228 F 39: 26.3–10: 8 (b); 68.3: cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Monuments, Materiality, and Meaning in the Classical Archaeology of Anatolia
    MONUMENTS, MATERIALITY, AND MEANING IN THE CLASSICAL ARCHAEOLOGY OF ANATOLIA by Daniel David Shoup A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Classical Art and Archaeology) in The University of Michigan 2008 Doctoral Committee: Professor Elaine K. Gazda, Co-Chair Professor John F. Cherry, Co-Chair, Brown University Professor Fatma Müge Göçek Professor Christopher John Ratté Professor Norman Yoffee Acknowledgments Athena may have sprung from Zeus’ brow alone, but dissertations never have a solitary birth: especially this one, which is largely made up of the voices of others. I have been fortunate to have the support of many friends, colleagues, and mentors, whose ideas and suggestions have fundamentally shaped this work. I would also like to thank the dozens of people who agreed to be interviewed, whose ideas and voices animate this text and the sites where they work. I offer this dissertation in hope that it contributes, in some small way, to a bright future for archaeology in Turkey. My committee members have been unstinting in their support of what has proved to be an unconventional project. John Cherry’s able teaching and broad perspective on archaeology formed the matrix in which the ideas for this dissertation grew; Elaine Gazda’s support, guidance, and advocacy of the project was indispensible to its completion. Norman Yoffee provided ideas and support from the first draft of a very different prospectus – including very necessary encouragement to go out on a limb. Chris Ratté has been a generous host at the site of Aphrodisias and helpful commentator during the writing process.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology and History of Lydia from the Early Lydian Period to Late Antiquity (8Th Century B.C.-6Th Century A.D.)
    Dokuz Eylül University – DEU The Research Center for the Archaeology of Western Anatolia – EKVAM Colloquia Anatolica et Aegaea Congressus internationales Smyrnenses IX Archaeology and history of Lydia from the early Lydian period to late antiquity (8th century B.C.-6th century A.D.). An international symposium May 17-18, 2017 / Izmir, Turkey ABSTRACTS Edited by Ergün Laflı Gülseren Kan Şahin Last Update: 21/04/2017. Izmir, May 2017 Websites: https://independent.academia.edu/TheLydiaSymposium https://www.researchgate.net/profile/The_Lydia_Symposium 1 This symposium has been dedicated to Roberto Gusmani (1935-2009) and Peter Herrmann (1927-2002) due to their pioneering works on the archaeology and history of ancient Lydia. Fig. 1: Map of Lydia and neighbouring areas in western Asia Minor (S. Patacı, 2017). 2 Table of contents Ergün Laflı, An introduction to Lydian studies: Editorial remarks to the abstract booklet of the Lydia Symposium....................................................................................................................................................8-9. Nihal Akıllı, Protohistorical excavations at Hastane Höyük in Akhisar………………………………10. Sedat Akkurnaz, New examples of Archaic architectural terracottas from Lydia………………………..11. Gülseren Alkış Yazıcı, Some remarks on the ancient religions of Lydia……………………………….12. Elif Alten, Revolt of Achaeus against Antiochus III the Great and the siege of Sardis, based on classical textual, epigraphic and numismatic evidence………………………………………………………………....13. Gaetano Arena, Heleis: A chief doctor in Roman Lydia…….……………………………………....14. Ilias N. Arnaoutoglou, Κοινὸν, συμβίωσις: Associations in Hellenistic and Roman Lydia……….……..15. Eirini Artemi, The role of Ephesus in the late antiquity from the period of Diocletian to A.D. 449, the “Robber Synod”.……………………………………………………………………….………...16. Natalia S. Astashova, Anatolian pottery from Panticapaeum…………………………………….17-18. Ayşegül Aykurt, Minoan presence in western Anatolia……………………………………………...19.
    [Show full text]
  • Greece • Crete • Turkey May 28 - June 22, 2021
    GREECE • CRETE • TURKEY MAY 28 - JUNE 22, 2021 Tour Hosts: Dr. Scott Moore Dr. Jason Whitlark organized by GREECE - CRETE - TURKEY / May 28 - June 22, 2021 May 31 Mon ATHENS - CORINTH CANAL - CORINTH – ACROCORINTH - NAFPLION At 8:30a.m. depart from Athens and drive along the coastal highway of Saronic Gulf. Arrive at the Corinth Canal for a brief stop and then continue on to the Acropolis of Corinth. Acro-corinth is the citadel of Corinth. It is situated to the southwest of the ancient city and rises to an elevation of 1883 ft. [574 m.]. Today it is surrounded by walls that are about 1.85 mi. [3 km.] long. The foundations of the fortifications are ancient—going back to the Hellenistic Period. The current walls were built and rebuilt by the Byzantines, Franks, Venetians, and Ottoman Turks. Climb up and visit the fortress. Then proceed to the Ancient city of Corinth. It was to this megalopolis where the apostle Paul came and worked, established a thriving church, subsequently sending two of his epistles now part of the New Testament. Here, we see all of the sites associated with his ministry: the Agora, the Temple of Apollo, the Roman Odeon, the Bema and Gallio’s Seat. The small local archaeological museum here is an absolute must! In Romans 16:23 Paul mentions his friend Erastus and • • we will see an inscription to him at the site. In the afternoon we will drive to GREECE CRETE TURKEY Nafplion for check-in at hotel followed by dinner and overnight. (B,D) MAY 28 - JUNE 22, 2021 June 1 Tue EPIDAURAUS - MYCENAE - NAFPLION Morning visit to Mycenae where we see the remains of the prehistoric citadel Parthenon, fortified with the Cyclopean Walls, the Lionesses’ Gate, the remains of the Athens Mycenaean Palace and the Tomb of King Agamemnon in which we will actually enter.
    [Show full text]
  • King's Research Portal
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by King's Research Portal King’s Research Portal Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication record in King's Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Bowden, H. (2013). Seeking Certainty and Claiming Authority: the Consultation of Greek Oracles from the Classical to the Roman Imperial Periods. London: King's College London. Citing this paper Please note that where the full-text provided on King's Research Portal is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Post-Print version this may differ from the final Published version. If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version for pagination, volume/issue, and date of publication details. And where the final published version is provided on the Research Portal, if citing you are again advised to check the publisher's website for any subsequent corrections. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Research Portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognize and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. •Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research. •You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain •You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the Research Portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
    [Show full text]
  • Bauforschung
    BAUFORSCHUNG Gottfried Gruben: Klassische Bauforschung Das Forschungsgebiet Die „Bauforschung“ behandelt alles, was mit dem Bauen zu tun hat. Die technische Bauforschung, eine junge, erst nach 1945 gegründete Disziplin, untersucht heutige Baumethoden und -materialien. Die histo- rische Bauforschung versucht das ganze Spektrum des menschlichen Bauens, von der prähistorischen Hütte bis zum gegenwärtigen Hochhaus, vom Lehmziegel bis zur Stadtanlage, zu erforschen.1 Das weite Feld der historischen Bauforschung umfaßt die Entdeckung (zum Beispiel durch Ausgrabung), die Dokumentation (zeichnerische Aufnahme, Foto, Modell, Beschreibung), die zeichnerische Rekon- struktion, die Konservierung und Restaurierung (Denkmalpflege), die Wiederaufrichtung (Anastilosis), die materielle Rekonstruktion sowie die Einordnung und das Verständnis im kulturellen Kontext (tech- nisch, funktional, ästhetisch, historisch, religiös). Die Klassische oder Archäologische Bauforschung be- schränkt sich zwar (gemeinsam mit der Klassischen Archäologie) auf ein Teilgebiet der Geschichte, die griechisch-römische Antike, ist aber historisch und methodologisch die „Mutter“ der Bauforschung seit dem 15. Jahrhundert. Der hier umrissene Katalog von praktischen und theoretischen Aufgaben bildet das Arbeitsgebiet von Ar- chitekten, die Vermessung und Darstellung räumlicher Gebilde ebenso wie Konstruktion und Entwerfen beherrschen, die solide praktische Erfahrungen und, nicht zuletzt, eine breite historische Bildung besitzen. Fügen wir die conditio sine qua non hinzu: zeichnerisches
    [Show full text]
  • "On the Relations of Canaanite Exploration to Pre-Historic Classic
    176 ON THE RELATIONS OF CANAANITE EXPLORATION These inecriptions, and the bas-reliefs on the monument called Kamna Hurmill, in Crelo-Syria, near the source of the Orontes, and possibly of the same pe1·iod, are an enigma, as yet, to the most learned Orientaliots. It is to be hoped, however, now that attention is again called to the subject, that the clue may be found that shall unlock their meaning, and that Northern 8yI"ia will be no longer overlooked by tho explorer. DISCOVERY AT THE l\IOSQUE EL AKS.A, JERUSALEM.-llo A DISCOVERY of considerable interest has been made in this :Mosque by the Rev. J. Neil, who has only recently gone to Jerusalem for the Society for the Conversion of the Jews. "In the Mosque of El Aksa," he writes, "you will remember that there is a long plain room opening out at the south-east angle, called the Mosque of Omar, in which the only object of interest whatever is a recess supported by two twisted pillars, and called the Mihrab, or Praying-place of Omar. You may, perhaps, remember that the pillars on each side of this recess, of Solomonic twisted pattern and polished marble, appear to have been turned upside down, and to have their capitals of greyish stone in broken leaf-like patterns below. On vi~iting this the day before yesterday, July 5th, I discovered that a great part of the yellowish plaster had been removed from the top of these pillars, and that rich grotesquely carved capitals were exposed to view in an admirable state of preserva­ tion.
    [Show full text]
  • 9 · the Growth of an Empirical Cartography in Hellenistic Greece
    9 · The Growth of an Empirical Cartography in Hellenistic Greece PREPARED BY THE EDITORS FROM MATERIALS SUPPLIED BY GERMAINE AUJAe There is no complete break between the development of That such a change should occur is due both to po­ cartography in classical and in Hellenistic Greece. In litical and military factors and to cultural developments contrast to many periods in the ancient and medieval within Greek society as a whole. With respect to the world, we are able to reconstruct throughout the Greek latter, we can see how Greek cartography started to be period-and indeed into the Roman-a continuum in influenced by a new infrastructure for learning that had cartographic thought and practice. Certainly the a profound effect on the growth of formalized know­ achievements of the third century B.C. in Alexandria had ledge in general. Of particular importance for the history been prepared for and made possible by the scientific of the map was the growth of Alexandria as a major progress of the fourth century. Eudoxus, as we have seen, center of learning, far surpassing in this respect the had already formulated the geocentric hypothesis in Macedonian court at Pella. It was at Alexandria that mathematical models; and he had also translated his Euclid's famous school of geometry flourished in the concepts into celestial globes that may be regarded as reign of Ptolemy II Philadelphus (285-246 B.C.). And it anticipating the sphairopoiia. 1 By the beginning of the was at Alexandria that this Ptolemy, son of Ptolemy I Hellenistic period there had been developed not only the Soter, a companion of Alexander, had founded the li­ various celestial globes, but also systems of concentric brary, soon to become famous throughout the Mediter­ spheres, together with maps of the inhabited world that ranean world.
    [Show full text]
  • TÜBA-AR Sayı23.Pdf
    Prof.Dr. Harald HAUPTMANN (4 Eylül 1936 - 2 Ağustos 2018) Saygıyla anıyoruz... In Memoriam... TÜBA-AR Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi Turkish Academy of Sciences Journal of Archaeology Sayı: 23 Volume: 23 2018 TÜBA Arkeoloji (TÜBA-AR) Dergisi TÜBA-AR TÜBA-AR uluslararası hakemli bir TÜRKİYE BİLİMLER AKADEMİSİ ARKEOLOJİ DERGİSİ dergi olup TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM (SBVT) ve Avrupa İnsani Bilimler Referans TÜBA-AR, Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi (TÜBA) tarafından yıllık olarak İndeksi (ERIH PLUS) veritabanlarında yayınlanan uluslararası hakemli bir dergidir. Derginin yayın politikası, kapsamı taranmaktadır. ve içeriği ile ilgili kararlar, Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Konseyi tarafından TÜBA Journal of Archaeology belirlenen Yayın Kurulu tarafından alınır. (TÜBA-AR) TÜBA-AR is an international refereed journal and indexed in the TUBİTAK DERGİNİN KAPSAMI VE YAYIN İLKELERİ ULAKBİM (SBVT) and The European Reference Index for the Humanities TÜBA-AR dergisi ilke olarak, dönem ve coğrafi bölge sınırlaması olmadan and the Social Sciences (ERIH PLUS) arkeoloji ve arkeoloji ile bağlantılı tüm alanlarda yapılan yeni araştırma, yorum, databases. değerlendirme ve yöntemleri kapsamaktadır. Dergi arkeoloji alanında yeni yapılan çalışmalara yer vermenin yanı sıra, bir bilim akademisi yayın organı Sahibi / Owner: Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi adına olarak, arkeoloji ile bağlantılı olmak koşuluyla, sosyal bilimlerin tüm uzmanlık Prof. Dr. Ahmet Cevat ACAR alanlarına açıktır; bu alanlarda gelişen yeni yorum, yaklaşım, analizlere yer veren (Başkan / President) bir forum oluşturma işlevini de yüklenmiştir. Sorumlu Yazı İşleri Müdürü Dergi, arkeoloji ile ilgili yeni açılımları kapsamlı olarak ele almak için belirli Managing Editor Prof. Dr. Ahmet Nuri YURDUSEV bir konuya odaklanmış yazıları “dosya” şeklinde kapsamına alabilir; bu amaçla çağrılı yazarların katkısının istenmesi ya da bu bağlamda gelen istekler Yayın Basın ve Halkla İlişkiler Kurulu tarafından değerlendirir.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of the Late Helladic Iiic Period in Anatolia *
    TAL 46-47 -pag 7-26 (-03 BARISGUR):inloop document Talanta 05-06-2016 14:29 Pagina 7 TALANTA XLVI-XLVII (2014-2015), 7 - 26 AN OVERVIEW OF THE LATE HELLADIC IIIC PERIOD IN ANATOLIA * Barış Gür When we look into western Anatolia in the LH IIIC Period, an increase in Mycenaean pottery is observed in comparison with the preceding periods along the coast in settlements like Panaztepe, Liman Tepe, Bademgediği Tepe, Kadıkalesi, Miletos, and Çine-Tepecik. In this article, I argue that the relative increase in Mycenaean artifacts on the Anatolian west coast relates to Mycenaean immigrants, rather than merchants making use of the political gap in western Anatolia. The distribution pattern of Mycenaean artifacts on the Anatolian west coast was, however, not uniform, and various sites and regions, most notably Troy, experienced an influx of Balkan influence, whilst Mycenaean cultural influence apparently dwindled. When the process preparing the end of the Bronze Age is analyzed chronologi - cally, it can be learned that the Mycenaean palaces were destroyed and lots of settlements in Mainland Greece were evacuated 1. Arzawa in Western Anatolia and Hittite country, which had been a major regional power, was destroyed (Woudhuizen 2006, 51) , various coastal cities in the Eastern Mediterranean were damaged 2.The Postpalatial world, emerging after the destruction of Mycenaean palaces at the end of Late Helladic IIIB, is described as the LH IIIC Period. When we look into Anatolia in the LH IIIC Period, we see that a considerable amount of LH IIIC ceramics were obtained after the destruction of the palaces * I would like to extend my sincerest thanks to Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Stud Troica 19:Layout 1.Qxd
    The Sessile Kantharos of the Archaic Northeast Aegean Ceramic Assemblage: the Anatolian Connection Petya Ilieva* Abstract The presence of a particular version of kantharos, absent from the Greek ceramic repertoire, has long ago been noticed in the Archaic wares of the Northeastern Aegean/Northwestern Anatolia. This tall conical cup with two high, strap, rim-han- dles and low, ring base appears mainly in the repertory of the G2/3 and Gray Wares, but contemporary variations of the shape, produced in the style of other pottery groups (Chian, Lemnian monochrome Red Ware, LG/Sub-Geometric from Antandros, Samian LG) evidence the flux of knowledge between the workshops of the Archaic North Aegean ceramic koine. The kantharos, however, is well paralleled in a LBA West Anatolian vase, which provides a possible prototype of the shape. Zusammenfassung Das Vorkommen einer speziellen, nicht im griechischen Keramikrepertoire vorhandenen Kantharos-Form ist seit längerem im archaischen Warenkatalog der Nordost-Ägäis und in Nordwest-Anatolien bekannt. Dieser hochaufragende konische Be- cher mit zwei überrandständigen Bandhenkeln und flachem Standring kommt hauptsächlich im Repertoire der G2/3-Ware und der Grauen Waren vor, jedoch belegen zeitgleiche Formvarianten, produziert im Stile anderer Keramikgruppen (mono- chrome rote Ware von Chios, Lemnos, spät/subgeometrische von Antandros und Samos), den Austausch zwischen den Werkstätten der archaischen Keramikkoine in der Nord-Ägäis. Der Kantharos jedenfalls ist gut vergleichbar mit einer spät- bronzezeitlichen Gefässform West-Anatoliens, die einen möglichen Prototyp dieser Form darstellt. Introduction thin, fine ridges and the high, strap handles provide the vase with a rather ›metallic‹ look. A deep, conical cup with two high, strap, rim-han- The discussion that follows places the shape in its dles, often with a concave outer surface, oval mouth ceramic and social contexts and aims at establishing and a low, ring base (pl.
    [Show full text]