University of Florida Thesis Or Dissertation Formatting

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

University of Florida Thesis Or Dissertation Formatting MANAGEMENT OF MAJOR PEANUT (Arachis hypogaea L.) DISEASES USING BAHIAGRASS (Paspalum notatum Fluegge) ROTATION BY FRANCIS KODJO TSIGBEY A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2007 1 © 2007 Francis Kodjo Tsigbey 2 To my children and entire family 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am highly indebted to Dr. Jim Marois for the opportunity to work with him and for his invaluable mentoring and patience. I thank the rest of my supervisory committee, Dr. Lawrence Datnoff, Dr. David Wright, Dr. Jeffery Jones, and Dr. Jimmy Rich for their support, insight, and constructive critique of this work. My thanks go to all the staff at the Extension Agronomy section, NFREC Quincy for their time and assistance in conducting this research. I thank the staff of Dept. of Plant Pathology, Univ. of Florida especially Gail Harris for taking time to sort out my complex paper work during my study. My gratitude goes to all my friends Dr. and Mrs Clottey, Enoch Osekre, Jennifer McGriff, Dr. Tawainga Katsvairo, Mary Arhinful, Ernest Ankrah, Dr. Daniel Mailhot, Dr. Susan Bambo, Loraine Gibson, Cynthia Holloway and all others for their encouragement throughout all these years. To my family Grace Dikro, Peace Amoako, Rev. Dr. Kofi Asimpi, Linda Dzah, Kwaku Bansah, Mr. Aigboviobsia and many others, I say thank you for standing with me and supporting me in unimaginable ways. I thank my siblings (Amy Acolatse, Dora Boso, and Emmanuel Tsigbey among others) for their prayers and sacrifices. I also thank my beloved parents Bertha Afare and the late Tefe Tsigbe. I am proud to be their son and I thank them for the suffering they endured in bringing me up. I also thank my children (Akpedonu Kodzo Tsigbey Jr., Edem Tsigbey, and Mawuena Tsigbey). Nothing I can do could pay for their sacrifice, for they have paid the price for my pride. It has been a long journey, and I thank all whose name I am not able to mention here. I thank them for allowing God to use them in bringing me this far. Finally, I thank the Lord God Almighty for His guidance, wisdom and protection. For unto God belong the glory and honor of my life. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...............................................................................................................4 LIST OF FIGURES .........................................................................................................................9 ABSTRACT...................................................................................................................................11 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION AND LITERATURE REVIEW ..............................................................13 Importance of Peanut in the United States (US) Economy .............................................13 Overview of Peanut Diseases and their Management .....................................................14 Peanut Diseases Caused by Nematodes ..........................................................................19 Impact of Crop Rotations on Diseases ............................................................................19 Cover Crops and Crop Disease Management..................................................................20 Influence of Organic Amendments on Plant Diseases ....................................................20 Role of Root Exudates in Rhizosphere Interactions........................................................22 Allelopathic Properties of Bahiagrass .............................................................................23 2 EFFECT OF BAHIAGRASS (Paspalum notatum fluegge) AND CONVENTIONAL ROTATION ON EARLY LEAF SPOT (Cercospora arachidicola s. hori), LATE LEAF SPOT (Cercosporidium personatum (Berk. & M.A. Curtis) Deighton), AND RUST (Puccinia arachidis Speg.) DISEASES ON PEANUT IN NORTH FLORIDA.........25 Introduction.............................................................................................................................25 Importance of Peanut Diseases and their Management...................................................25 Epidemiology of ELS and LLS .......................................................................................26 Peanut Rust (Puccinia arachidis Speg.)..........................................................................27 Management of Peanut Leaf Spots..................................................................................28 Materials and Methods ...........................................................................................................30 Rotations and Field Practices ..........................................................................................30 Field Practices in 2003 and 2004.....................................................................................31 Field Practices in 2005 and 2006.....................................................................................32 Disease Assessments .......................................................................................................33 Pod Yield and Grade .......................................................................................................34 Statistical Analysis ..........................................................................................................34 Results.....................................................................................................................................35 Rust (Puccinia arachidis)................................................................................................37 Influence of Rotations on Peanut Pod Yield and Quality................................................37 Discussion...............................................................................................................................37 5 3 SUPPRESSION OF TOMATO SPOTTED WILT (TSW) OF PEANUT IN A BAHIAGRASS (Paspalum notatum Fluegge) ROTATION..................................................49 Introduction.............................................................................................................................49 Materials and Methods ...........................................................................................................52 Rotation and Cultural Practices.......................................................................................52 Field Practices in 2003 and 2004.....................................................................................52 Field Practices in 2005 and 2006.....................................................................................53 Tomato Spotted Wilt Assessment ...................................................................................53 Thrips Infestation Studies................................................................................................54 Statistical Analysis ..........................................................................................................55 Results.....................................................................................................................................55 Monitoring of Thrips Activity.........................................................................................57 Pod Yield and Grade .......................................................................................................59 Discussion...............................................................................................................................59 4 EFFECT OF ROTATIONS ON SOUTHERN STEM ROT (SSR) (Sclerotium rolfsii sacc) AND SURVIVAL OF SCLEROTIA IN FIELD SOIL AMENDED WITH BAHIAGRASS CUTTINGS UNDER GREENHOUSE CONDITIONS. .............................70 Introduction.............................................................................................................................70 Material and methods .............................................................................................................73 Field Studies ....................................................................................................................73 Isolation and Maintenance of Micro-organisms..............................................................74 Soil Treatment .................................................................................................................74 Determination of Sclerotia Survival in Soils...................................................................75 Data Analyses..................................................................................................................75 Results.....................................................................................................................................76 Field Results ....................................................................................................................76 Greenhouse Results .........................................................................................................76 Discussion...............................................................................................................................77 5 EFFECT OF BAHIAGRASS ON NEMATODE POPULATION, REPRODUCTION AND MOVEMENT IN THE FIELD, GREENHOUSE AND LABORATORY CONDITIONS........................................................................................................................81 Introduction.............................................................................................................................81
Recommended publications
  • Monocyclic Components for Evaluating Disease Resistance to Cercospora Arachidicola and Cercosporidium Personatum in Peanut
    Monocyclic Components for Evaluating Disease Resistance to Cercospora arachidicola and Cercosporidium personatum in Peanut by Limin Gong A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Auburn, Alabama August 6, 2016 Keywords: monocyclic components, disease resistance Copyright 2016 by Limin Gong Approved by Kira L. Bowen, Chair, Professor of Entomology and Plant Pathology Charles Y. Chen, Associate Professor of Crop, Soil and Environmental Sciences John F. Murphy, Professor of Entomology and Plant Pathology Jeffrey J. Coleman, Assisstant Professor of Entomology and Plant Pathology ABSTRACT Cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is an economically important crop that is produced in the United States and throughout the world. However, there are two major fungal pathogens of cultivated peanuts, and they each contribute to substantial yield losses of 50% or greater. The pathogens of these diseases are Cercospora arachidicola which causes early leaf spot (ELS), and Cercosporidium personatum which causes late leaf spot (LLS). While fungicide treatments are fairly effective for leaf spot management, disease resistance is still the best strategy. Therefore, it is important to evaluate and compare different genotypes for their disease resistance levels. The overall goal of this study was to determine resistance levels of different peanut genotypes to ELS and LLS. The peanut genotypes (Chit P7, C1001, Exp27-1516, Flavor Runner 458, PI 268868, and GA-12Y) used in this study include two genetically modified lines (Chit P7 and C1001) that over-expresses a chitinase gene. This overall goal was addressed with three specific objectives: 1) determine suitable conditions for pathogen culture and spore production in vitro; 2) determine suitable conditions for establishing infection in the greenhouse; 3) compare ELS and LLS disease reactions of young plants to those of older plants.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Padil Species Factsheet Scientific Name: Common Name Image
    1. PaDIL Species Factsheet Scientific Name: Passalora personata (Berk. & M.A. Curtis) S.A. Khan & M. Kamal Anamorphic fungi Common Name Late leaf spot of peanut Live link: http://www.padil.gov.au/pests-and-diseases/Pest/Main/136607 Image Library Australian Biosecurity Live link: http://www.padil.gov.au/pests-and-diseases/ Partners for Australian Biosecurity image library Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment https://www.awe.gov.au/ Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Western Australia https://dpird.wa.gov.au/ Plant Health Australia https://www.planthealthaustralia.com.au/ Museums Victoria https://museumsvictoria.com.au/ 2. Species Information 2.1. Details Specimen Contact: Dr Jose R. Liberato - [email protected] Author: Liberato JR & Shivas RG Citation: Liberato JR & Shivas RG (2006) Late leaf spot of peanut(Passalora personata )Updated on 7/12/2006 Available online: PaDIL - http://www.padil.gov.au Image Use: Free for use under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY- NC 4.0) 2.2. URL Live link: http://www.padil.gov.au/pests-and-diseases/Pest/Main/136607 2.3. Facets Status: Exotic Species Occurrence in Australia Group: Fungi Commodity Overview: Horticulture Commodity Type: Grains Distribution: Cosmopolitan 2.4. Other Names Cercospora arachidis Henn. Cercospora personata (Berk. & M.A. Curtis) Ellis & Everh. Cercosporidium personatum (Berk. & M.A. Curtis) Deighton Cercosporiopsis personata (Berk. & M.A. Curtis) Miura Cladosporium personatum Berk. & M.A. Curtis Mycosphaerella berkeleyi W.A. Jenkins (teleomorph) Phaeoisariopsis personata (Berk. & M.A. Curtis) Arx Septogloeum arachidis Racib. 2.5. Diagnostic Notes Symptoms: Leaf spots circular, coalescing, dark brown to blackish-brown, 5-10 mm diameter, occasionally a yellow halo appearing in mature spots (Mulder & Holliday 1974).
    [Show full text]
  • (US) 38E.85. a 38E SEE", A
    USOO957398OB2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,573,980 B2 Thompson et al. (45) Date of Patent: Feb. 21, 2017 (54) FUSION PROTEINS AND METHODS FOR 7.919,678 B2 4/2011 Mironov STIMULATING PLANT GROWTH, 88: R: g: Ei. al. 1 PROTECTING PLANTS FROM PATHOGENS, 3:42: ... g3 is et al. A61K 39.00 AND MMOBILIZING BACILLUS SPORES 2003/0228679 A1 12.2003 Smith et al." ON PLANT ROOTS 2004/OO77090 A1 4/2004 Short 2010/0205690 A1 8/2010 Blä sing et al. (71) Applicant: Spogen Biotech Inc., Columbia, MO 2010/0233.124 Al 9, 2010 Stewart et al. (US) 38E.85. A 38E SEE",teWart et aal. (72) Inventors: Brian Thompson, Columbia, MO (US); 5,3542011/0321197 AllA. '55.12/2011 SE",Schön et al.i. Katie Thompson, Columbia, MO (US) 2012fO259101 A1 10, 2012 Tan et al. 2012fO266327 A1 10, 2012 Sanz Molinero et al. (73) Assignee: Spogen Biotech Inc., Columbia, MO 2014/0259225 A1 9, 2014 Frank et al. US (US) FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this CA 2146822 A1 10, 1995 patent is extended or adjusted under 35 EP O 792 363 B1 12/2003 U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days. EP 1590466 B1 9, 2010 EP 2069504 B1 6, 2015 (21) Appl. No.: 14/213,525 WO O2/OO232 A2 1/2002 WO O306684.6 A1 8, 2003 1-1. WO 2005/028654 A1 3/2005 (22) Filed: Mar. 14, 2014 WO 2006/O12366 A2 2/2006 O O WO 2007/078127 A1 7/2007 (65) Prior Publication Data WO 2007/086898 A2 8, 2007 WO 2009037329 A2 3, 2009 US 2014/0274707 A1 Sep.
    [Show full text]
  • European Patent Office EP2157183 A1
    (19) & (11) EP 2 157 183 A1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION (43) Date of publication: (51) Int Cl.: 24.02.2010 Bulletin 2010/08 C12N 15/82 (2006.01) C12N 15/55 (2006.01) C12N 9/50 (2006.01) C12N 5/04 (2006.01) (2006.01) (2006.01) (21) Application number: 09177897.7 A01H 5/00 A01H 5/10 (22) Date of filing: 27.08.2001 (84) Designated Contracting States: • Sarria-Millan, Rodrigo AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU Cary, NC 27519 (US) MC NL PT SE TR • Chen, Ruoying Apex, NC 27502 (US) (30) Priority: 25.08.2000 US 227794 P • Allen, Damian Champaign, IL 61822 (US) (62) Document number(s) of the earlier application(s) in • Härtel, Heiko A. accordance with Art. 76 EPC: 13088, Berlin (DE) 01968216.0 / 1 349 946 (74) Representative: Krieger, Stephan Gerhard (71) Applicant: BASF Plant Science GmbH BASF SE 67056 Ludwigshafen (DE) GVX/B - C 6 Carl-Bosch-Strasse 38 (72) Inventors: 67056 Ludwigshafen (DE) • Da Costa e Silva, Oswaldo Apex, NC 27502 (US) Remarks: • Henkes, Stefan This application was filed on 03-12-2009 as a 14482, Potsdam (DE) divisional application to the application mentioned • Mittendorf, Volker under INID code 62. Hillsborough, NC 27278 (US) (54) Plant polynucleotides encoding prenyl proteases (57) The present invention provides novel polynucle- novel polynucleotides encoding plant promoters, otides encoding plant prenyl protease polypeptides, frag- polypeptides, fragments and homologs thereof. The in- ments and homologs thereof. Also provided arc vectors, vention further relates to methods of applying these novel host cells, antibodies, and recombinant methods for pro- plant polypeptides to the identification, prevention, ducing said polypeptides.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Detection of Airborne Inoculum of Nothopassalora Personata in Spore Trap Samples from Peanut Fields Using Quantitative PCR
    plants Article Early Detection of Airborne Inoculum of Nothopassalora personata in Spore Trap Samples from Peanut Fields Using Quantitative PCR Misbakhul Munir 1, Hehe Wang 1, Nicholas S. Dufault 2 and Daniel J. Anco 1,* 1 Department of Plant and Environment Science, Clemson University, Edisto Research and Education Center, Blackville, SC 29817, USA; [email protected] (M.M.); [email protected] (H.W.) 2 Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA; nsdufault@ufl.edu * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 15 September 2020; Accepted: 7 October 2020; Published: 9 October 2020 Abstract: A quantitative PCR (qPCR)-assay was developed to detect airborne inoculum of Nothopassalora personata, causal agent of late leaf spot (LLS) on peanut, collected with a modified impaction spore trap. The qPCR assay was able to consistently detect as few as 10 spores with purified DNA and 25 spores based on crude DNA extraction from rods. In 2019, two spore traps were placed in two peanut fields with a history of LLS. Sampling units were replaced every 2 to 4 days and tested with the developed qPCR assay, while plots were monitored for symptom development. The system detected inoculum 35 to 56 days before visual symptoms developed in the field, with detection related to environmental parameters affecting pathogen life-cycle and disease development. This study develops the framework of the qPCR spore trap system and represents the initial steps towards validation of the performance of the system for use as a decision support tool to complement integrated management of LLS. Keywords: specific primers; Cercosporidium personatum; spore collection; Arachis hypogaea 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships Among Some Cercosporoid Anamorphs of Mycosphaerella Based on Rdna Sequence Analysis
    Mycol. Res. 103 (11): 1491–1499 (1999) Printed in the United Kingdom 1491 Phylogenetic relationships among some cercosporoid anamorphs of Mycosphaerella based on rDNA sequence analysis ELWIN L.STEWART, ZHAOWEI LIU, PEDRO W.CROUS1, AND LES J.SZABO2 " Department of Plant Pathology, The Pennsylvania State University, Buckhout Laboratory, University Park, PA, 16802, U.S.A., Department of # Plant Pathology, University of Stellenbosch, P. Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa, and USDA ARS Cereal Disease Laboratory, 1551 Lindig Street, St Paul, MN 55108, U.S.A. Partial rDNA sequences were obtained from 26 isolates representing species of Cercospora, Passalora, Paracercospora, Pseudocercospora, Ramulispora, Pseudocercosporella and Mycocentrospora. The combined internal transcribed spacers (ITS) including the 5n8S rRNA gene and 5h end of the 25S gene (primer pairs F63\R635) on rDNA were amplified using PCR and sequenced directly. The ITS regions including the 5n8S varied in length from 502 to 595 bp. The F63\R635 region varied from 508 to 519 bp among isolates sequenced. Reconstructed phylogenies inferred from both regions had highly similar topologies for the taxa examined. Phylogenetic analysis of the sequences resulted in four well-supported clades corresponding to Cercospora, Paracercospora\Pseudocercospora, Passalora and Ramulispora, with bootstrap values greater than 92% for each clade. Based on the results of the analysis, a new combination for Pseudocercosporella aestiva is proposed in Ramulispora, and Paracercospora is reduced to synonymy with Pseudocercospora. Mycosphaerella (Dothideales, Mycosphaerellaceae) is one of Colletogloeopsis (Crous & Wingfield, 1997a), Uwebraunia (Crous the largest genera of ascomycetes (Corlett, 1991, 1995), and & Wingfield, 1996) and Sonderhenia (Park & Keane, 1984; has been linked to at least 27 different coelomycete or Swart & Walker, 1988).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Check-List of Cladosporium Names Frank M. DUGAN, Konstanze
    Check-list of Cladosporium names Frank M. DUGAN , Konstanze SCHUBERT & Uwe BRAUN Abstract: DUGAN , F.M., SCHUBERT , K. & BRAUN ; U. (2004): Check-list of Cladosporium names. Schlechtendalia 11 : 1–119. Names of species and subspecific taxa referred to the hyphomycetous genus Cladosporium are listed. Citations for original descriptions, types, synonyms, teleomorphs (if known), references of important redescriptions in literature, illustrations as well as notes are given. This list contains data of 772 taxa, i.e., valid, invalid and illegitime species, varieties and formae as well as herbarium names. Zusammenfassung: DUGAN , F.M., SCHUBERT , K. & BRAUN ; U. (2004): Checkliste der Cladosporium -Namen. Schlechtendalia 11 : 1–119. Namen von Arten und subspezifischen Taxa der Hyphomycetengattung Cladosporium werden aufgelistet. Bibliographische Angaben zur Erstbeschreibung, Typusangaben, Synonyme, die Teleomorphe (falls bekannt), wichtige Literaturhinweise und Abbildungen sowie Anmerkungen werden angegeben. Die vorliegende Liste enthält Namen von 772 Taxa, d. h. gültige, ungültige und illegitime Arten, Varietäten, Formen und auch Herbarnamen. Introduction: Cladosporium Link (LINK 1816) is one of the largest genera of hyphomycetes, comprising more than 772 names, but also one of the most heterogeneous ones, which is not very surprising since all early circumscriptions and delimitations from similar genera were rather vague and imprecise (FRIES 1832, 1849; SACCARDO 1886; LINDAU 1907, etc.). All kinds of superficially similar cladosporioid fungi, i.e., amero- to phragmosporous dematiaceous hyphomycetes with conidia formed in acropetal chains, were assigned to Cladosporium s. lat., ranging from saprobes to plant pathogens as well as human-pathogenic taxa. DE VRIES (1952) and ELLIS (1971, 1976) maintained broad concepts of Cladosporium . ARX (1983), MORGAN - JONES & JACOBSEN (1988), MCKEMY & MORGAN -JONES (1990), MORGAN -JONES & MCKEMY (1990) and DAVID (1997) discussed the heterogeneity of Cladosporium and contributed towards a more natural circumscription of this genus.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Analysis of Cercospora and Mycosphaerella Based on the Internal Transcribed Spacer Region of Ribosomal DNA
    Ecology and Population Biology Phylogenetic Analysis of Cercospora and Mycosphaerella Based on the Internal Transcribed Spacer Region of Ribosomal DNA Stephen B. Goodwin, Larry D. Dunkle, and Victoria L. Zismann Crop Production and Pest Control Research, U.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, 1155 Lilly Hall, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907. Current address of V. L. Zismann: The Institute for Genomic Research, 9712 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD 20850. Accepted for publication 26 March 2001. ABSTRACT Goodwin, S. B., Dunkle, L. D., and Zismann, V. L. 2001. Phylogenetic main Cercospora cluster. Only species within the Cercospora cluster analysis of Cercospora and Mycosphaerella based on the internal produced the toxin cercosporin, suggesting that the ability to produce this transcribed spacer region of ribosomal DNA. Phytopathology 91:648- compound had a single evolutionary origin. Intraspecific variation for 658. 25 taxa in the Mycosphaerella clade averaged 1.7 nucleotides (nts) in the ITS region. Thus, isolates with ITS sequences that differ by two or more Most of the 3,000 named species in the genus Cercospora have no nucleotides may be distinct species. ITS sequences of groups I and II of known sexual stage, although a Mycosphaerella teleomorph has been the gray leaf spot pathogen Cercospora zeae-maydis differed by 7 nts and identified for a few. Mycosphaerella is an extremely large and important clearly represent different species. There were 6.5 nt differences on genus of plant pathogens, with more than 1,800 named species and at average between the ITS sequences of the sorghum pathogen Cercospora least 43 associated anamorph genera.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Florida Thesis Or Dissertation
    FIELD EFFICACY OF QUINONE OUTSIDE INHIBITOR AND DEMETHYLATION INHIBITOR FUNGICIDES ON PEANUT FOLIAR DISEASES IN FLORIDA By WAEL M. ELWAKIL A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2018 © 2018 Wael M. Elwakil To my Mom ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I thank my family for their emotional support and encouragement during this journey of pursuing my master’s. I owe a great debt of gratitude to my masters and doctorate advisor Dr. Nicholas S. Dufault of the Plant Pathology Department at the University of Florida for his continuous support, advice, and mentoring. Dr. Dufault is undeniably one of the most respectable and generous people that I have ever encountered in my life. I would like also to acknowledge Mrs. Kristin Beckham for her help during the various steps of this project. I also thank Dr. Rebecca Barocco for assisting with the field trials setup, maintenance, and disease ratings. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................................................................. 4 LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................ 7 LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................... 8 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................. 9 ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Diseases of Oil Palm in Myanmar
    Diseases of Oil Palm in Myanmar Sr. Common Name Source Pathogen Order Family 1 Pestalotiopsis sp Gray Leaf Spot Melanconiales Melanconiaceae Current List Current List, 2 Phytophthora palmivora Stem canker Pythiales Pythiaceae CPC 2007 3 Aspergillus spp. Brown Germ Moniliales Dematiaceae Current List Botryodiplodia Anthracnose Sphaeropsidales Sphaeropsidaceae Current List 4 palmanum 5 Glomerella cingulata Anthracnose Sphaeriales Gnomoniaceaes Current List Cercospora elaeidis Cercospora leaf Mycosphaerellales Mycosphaerellaceae Current List 6 spot 7 Curvularia macula Seedling blight Pleosporales Pleosporaceae Current List 8 Pythium spp. Blast Saprolegniales Current List 9 Rhizoctonia spp. Blast Ceratobasidiales Ceratobasidiaceae Current List Fusarium wilt of Current List 10 Fusarium oxysporum Hypocreales Nectriaceae oil palm Current List, 11 Ceratocystis paradoxa Dry basal rot Microascales Ceratocystidaceae CPC 2007 12 Ganoderma philippii Root rot Polyporales Ganodermataceae CPC 2007 Macrophomina Charcoal rot Anamorphic fungi CPC 2007 13 - phaseolina - Phellinus noxius Brown root CPC 2007 14 Hymenochaetales Hymenochaetaceae disease Rigidoporus microporus CPC 2007 15 White root rot Polyporales Meripilaceae Insect pests of Oil Palm in Myanmar Source Sr. Scientific Name Common Name Order Family 1 Aonidiella orientalis oriental yellow scale Hemiptera Diaspididae CPC 2007 List 2 Araecerus fasciculatus cocoa weevil Coleoptera Anthribidae CPC 2007 List 3 Aspidiotus destructor coconut scale Hemiptera Diaspididae CPC 2007 List 4 Chrysomphalus dictyospermi
    [Show full text]
  • Characterising Plant Pathogen Communities and Their Environmental Drivers at a National Scale
    Lincoln University Digital Thesis Copyright Statement The digital copy of this thesis is protected by the Copyright Act 1994 (New Zealand). This thesis may be consulted by you, provided you comply with the provisions of the Act and the following conditions of use: you will use the copy only for the purposes of research or private study you will recognise the author's right to be identified as the author of the thesis and due acknowledgement will be made to the author where appropriate you will obtain the author's permission before publishing any material from the thesis. Characterising plant pathogen communities and their environmental drivers at a national scale A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Lincoln University by Andreas Makiola Lincoln University, New Zealand 2019 General abstract Plant pathogens play a critical role for global food security, conservation of natural ecosystems and future resilience and sustainability of ecosystem services in general. Thus, it is crucial to understand the large-scale processes that shape plant pathogen communities. The recent drop in DNA sequencing costs offers, for the first time, the opportunity to study multiple plant pathogens simultaneously in their naturally occurring environment effectively at large scale. In this thesis, my aims were (1) to employ next-generation sequencing (NGS) based metabarcoding for the detection and identification of plant pathogens at the ecosystem scale in New Zealand, (2) to characterise plant pathogen communities, and (3) to determine the environmental drivers of these communities. First, I investigated the suitability of NGS for the detection, identification and quantification of plant pathogens using rust fungi as a model system.
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Checklist of Fungi of Gujarat State, India
    Current Research in Environmental & Applied Mycology 5 (4): 285–306 (2015) ISSN 2229-2225 www.creamjournal.org Article CREAM Copyright © 2015 Online Edition Doi 10.5943/cream/5/4/1 A preliminary checklist of fungi of Gujarat State, India Rajput KS1*, Koyani RD1, Patel HR1, Vasava AM1, Patel RS1, Patel AD1 and Singh 2 AP 1Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, The Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda, Vadodara 390002, 2Chief Conservator of Forest, Wild Life Circle, Sardadar Baug, Junagadh 362001, India. *Address for correspondence: [email protected] Rajput KS, Koyani RD, Patel HP, Vasava AM, Patel RS, Patel AD, Singh AP 2015 – Preliminary checklist of fungi of Gujarat State, India. Current Research in Environmental & Applied Mycology 5(4), 285–306, Doi 10.5943/cream/5/4/1 Abstract The state of Gujarat is well known for its contrasting ecoregions such as moist deciduous forests and deserts. This paper deals with the documentation of fungi of Gujarat state. Field studies are carried out since 2007 in different parts of Gujarat to study the wood rot fungi that destroy wood logs in different forests. During these studies we noticed a great lacuna in documented record of fungi occurring in Gujarat. Here we provide, for the first time, a literature-based preliminary checklist of the fungi occurring in the state that is supplemented with our original field work and observations. It includes 334 species of 158 genera belonging to 78 families, which are further categorized into: Ascomycota (59 genera), Basidiomycota (85 genera), Chytridiomycota (2 genera), Oomycota (3 genera), “Zygomycota” (4 genera) and Myxomycota (5 genera).
    [Show full text]