Critical Canadiana
Critical Canadiana Jennifer Henderson In 1965, in the concluding essay to the first Literary History New World Myth: of Canada, Northrop Frye wrote that the question “Where is Postmodernism and here?” was the central preoccupation of Canadian culture. He Postcolonialism in equivocated as to the causes of this national condition of disori- Canadian Fiction By Marie Vautier entation, alternately suggesting historical, geographical, and cul- McGill-Queen’s tural explanations—the truncated history of a settler colony, the University Press, 1998 lack of a Western frontier in a country entered as if one were “be- ing silently swallowed by an alien continent” (217), a defensive The House of Difference: colonial “garrison mentality” (226)—explanations that were uni- Cultural Politics and National Identity in fied by their unexamined Eurocentrism. Frye’s thesis has since Canada proven to be an inexhaustible departure point for commentaries By Eva Mackey on Canadian literary criticism—as witnessed by this very essay, by Routledge, 1999 the title of one of the four books under review, as well as a recent issue of the journal Essays in Canadian Writing, organized around Writing a Politics of the question, “Where Is Here Now?” The question was first asked Perception: Memory, Holography, and Women at what many take to be the inaugural moment of the institution- Writers in Canada alization of CanLit, when the field began to be considered a cred- By Dawn Thompson ible area of research specialization.1 Since then, as one of the University of Toronto contributors to “Where Is Here Now?” observes, “Canadian liter- Press, 2000 ature as an area of study has become a rather staid inevitable in Here Is Queer: English departments” (Goldie 224).
[Show full text]