Coyote and the Introduction of Salmon

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Coyote and the Introduction of Salmon Coyote and the Introduction of Salmon - Thompson - Formerly there were no salmon in the interior, because they- were prevented from ascending by dams which the people of the coast had erected near the mouths of Columbia and Fraser Rivers. The Indians of the interior lived principally on meat, while those of the coast had all the salmon. The Coyote intended to remedy this, for he knew the salmon were kept prisoners by the coast people. He thought the people of the interior should have salmon too. The dam across the mouth of Fraser River was owned by four witch women. When Coyote had finished traveling through the Shuswap country, he descended Fraser River to the canyon, and there changing himself into a piece of wood, he floated down the stream until stopped by the fish-dam. From here the story is exactly the same as in the "Traditions of the Thompson River Indians," p. 27, from the 6th line to the end of the 36th. Coyote first led the salmon up to the head waters of the Fraser River, and then up all the tributary streams. He traveled along the river-banks, and they followed him. On his way up the Thompson River, about four miles above Spences Bridge, he sat down to have a rest, and saw four women bathing on the opposite side of the river. The story continues as in the "Traditions of the Thompson River Indians." from line from the foot of p. 27; to the end of line from the top of p. 28 in the full version. Coyote continued his journey, and led the salmon to the head waters of the North Thompson River, then, returning to Kamloops Lake, he conducted them up the South Thompson to Shuswap Lake. From the latter place he went south through the Spallumcheen and Okanagan to take the salmon up Columbia River. Four women had a dam across the latter stream, near its mouth, and all the coast people caught salmon at this place. Coyote changed himself into a piece of wood, as he had done at the mouth of Eraser River, and floated down against the dam. The women noticed the piece of wood next morning, and picked it up, saying it would make a fine dish. They fashioned it into a dish to eat salmon out of, but soon found there was some magic about it, for hardly had they put a salmon on the dish, before it would disappear. They thought the dish uncanny, and threw it into the fire. Thereupon Coyote changed himself into a baby, and cried from the middle of the fire. The women were all unmarried, and, desiring a baby very much, they - snatched him out of the fire. They reared him, and he grew rapidly. Within four days he could walk, in four days more he could speak, and likewise in a short time he became half grown. In the house were four baskets, with lids, made of cottonwood-bark, which the women told Coyote not to open. One day the women were out gathering firewood, and, when they came home, Coyote was crying. They asked him why he cried, and he answered, "I am always cold at nights. I should be warm if you would take me to sleep with you." That night they took him to bed with them. Next morning when the women went to bathe, they discovered some loose hair on their thighs, and wondered how it could have got there. They said it looked like Coyote's hair, but they thought it impossible that Coyote could have been in bed with them. That night, before going to bed, they all put pitch on their thighs. Again Coyote had connection with them, and the following morning, when they went to wash, they discovered very much of Coyote's hair sticking to the pitch. They said, "Our enemy, Coyote, must be around; but how could he be in bed with us without our knowing it?" Now the women went out to gather firewood, and when they had got out of sight, Coyote opened the lids of the four baskets. A cloud of blow-flies issued from the first, sand-flies from the second, horse-flies from the third, and wasps from the fourth. Then Coyote broke the dam, and let the salmon ascend the river. He said. "Henceforth there shall be no dam here, and the salmon will always ascend the river at this time of year without obstruction. They shall always be accompanied by blow-flies, sand-flies, horse-flies, and wasps, all of which shall appear, and continue to be numerous, during the salmon season." Now Coyote kept in advance of the salmon, and conducted them up the river and its tributaries. He had as his companion the Seal, who was a native of the coast. When he was yet some way below the falls of Columbia River. he pushed the Seal into the water, and transformed him, saying, `Henceforth you will be a common seal, and sometimes will come as far as this place." At the Falls of Columbia, Coyote remained a considerable time. Here he married the daughter of the Elk, who bore him a daughter. The latter grew very fast, like all the ancients, and soon became pubescent. About that time the mother found out that her husband was really Coyote, and made up her mind to leave him. Coyote knew this, and, taking his daughter, he said, "Henceforth this place will be called Nsu´pEh, and salmon will be caught here in great numbers." Coyote's daughter may still be seen just as she fell into the river. She sits there, half reclining, with legs outspread and knees above water. The water runs over her thighs. With a freshet, her head only can be seen. Below this place the river is very still, and salmon congregate here in large numbers. Now Coyote conducted the salmon up to the head waters of the Columbia, making many fishing-places on the way. He found many places where the river was so obstructed that the salmon could not ascend. These barriers he kicked down, leaving only canyons in their place. When ascending Similkameen River, he found a barrier on that stream. Here he saw four girls bathing across the river, and called to them, asking if they desired any back of the humpback salmon. They said to one another, "He addresses us in the NLak.a´pamux language. What does he ask us?" Four times he asked them, and at last one of them answered, "No; we desire the back of the head of the mountain sheep." If she had answered, "Yes," he would have thrown his penis into the girl, as he had done on the Thompson River. Coyote was angry, and said, "Very well! You shall have your wish. I will not remove this barrier, and you will have to wear out your moccasins traveling to Thompson or Okanagan River before you get salmon to eat." This is the reason why salmon cannot be got in Similka-meen: and why mountain sheep are very numerous in that country. The Similkameen people had to go to Okanagan River, Columbia River, and Thompson and Fraser Rivers to get salmon. Afterwards Coyote traveled into Montana and Idaho, and all through the Kootenai country, where he performed many wonderful feats. Returning, he took up his abode in the Kalispelm country, where he lived several years. He tried to get a wife there, but did not succeed. The following variants were obtained from an old NLak.a´pamux'o´e of Lytton: Long ago all the tribes throughout the interior had no salmon in their respective countries. Only the Coast people had salmon. They kept them for themselves by means of dams or weirs across the streams. Coyote broke the dams of these people on the Columbia and Fraser Rivers, and conducted the salmon up all the larger streams of the interior. He ordained that hence-forth salmon should ascend into the interior each year; and the broken dams he transformed into rocks, which at the present day form canyons on the Fraser and Columbia Rivers. The four boxes of the women who owned the dam across Fraser River contained flies, wasps, smoke, and wind. The wind blew the smoke, flies, and wasps up after the salmon and Coyote. This is the reason why flies, wasps, and smoke appear during the salmon season, and why the winds at that season always blow up- river. Some people say the locality where the great dam preventing salmon from coming up, which was broken by Coyote, was not near the mouth of Fraser River, but in the Canyon at Hell's Gate (between North Bend and Spuzzum). Others place it a little above Yale. Taken from: Myths and Tales from Nicola Valley and Fraser River collected by James Alexander Teit, 1911 Return to Table of Contents.
Recommended publications
  • Fraser River from Source to Mouth
    FRASER RIVER FROM SOURCE TO MOUTH September 5, 2017 - 11 Days Fares Per Person: $3395 double/twin $4065 single $3210 triple > Please add 5% GST. Early Bookers: $160 discount on first 12 seats; $80 on next 8 > Experience Points: Earn 76 points from this tour. Redeem 76 points if you book by July 5. Includes Flight from Victoria to Kelowna St. John the Divine Church in Yale Coach transportation for 10 days Harrison Hot Springs pools 10 nights of accommodation & hotel taxes Copper Room music & dancing with Jones Boys Helicopter to the source of the Fraser River Fraser River Safari boat excursion Fraser River raft float trip (no white water) Paddlewheeler cruise from New Westminster Huble Homestead tour to the mouth of the Fraser River Farwell Canyon and pictographs Gulf of Georgia Cannery National Historic Site Cariboo Chilcotin Museum Transfer from New Westminster to Victoria Hat Creek Historic Ranch and roadhouse tour Knowledgeable tour director Hell’s Gate Airtram Luggage handling at hotels Alexandra Suspension Bridge 21 meals: 8 breakfasts, 9 lunches, 4 dinners Activity Level This is a unique tour with lots of activity and time outdoors while you experience many aspects of the Fraser River. The trip to the source of the Fraser requires getting in and out of a helicopter, and walking about ½ km in an alpine meadow at 2,000 metres altitude. On other days, you are boarding a large raft and two boats. Walks in- clude Farwell Canyon pictographs, Alexandra Bridge, and the boat dock to Kilby Store. This tour has activity ranging from somewhat rigorous to sedentary.
    [Show full text]
  • Olive Clubtail (Stylurus Olivaceus) in Canada, Prepared Under Contract with Environment Canada
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Olive Clubtail Stylurus olivaceus in Canada ENDANGERED 2011 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2011. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Olive Clubtail Stylurus olivaceus in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. x + 58 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Robert A. Cannings, Sydney G. Cannings, Leah R. Ramsay and Richard J. Cannings for writing the status report on Olive Clubtail (Stylurus olivaceus) in Canada, prepared under contract with Environment Canada. This report was overseen and edited by Paul Catling, Co-chair of the COSEWIC Arthropods Specialist Subcommittee. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: 819-953-3215 Fax: 819-994-3684 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur le gomphe olive (Stylurus olivaceus) au Canada. Cover illustration/photo: Olive Clubtail — Photo by Jim Johnson. Permission granted for reproduction. ©Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2011. Catalogue No. CW69-14/637-2011E-PDF ISBN 978-1-100-18707-5 Recycled paper COSEWIC Assessment Summary Assessment Summary – May 2011 Common name Olive Clubtail Scientific name Stylurus olivaceus Status Endangered Reason for designation This highly rare, stream-dwelling dragonfly with striking blue eyes is known from only 5 locations within three separate regions of British Columbia.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 6.7-E
    Appendix 6.7-E Thompson River Hydrologic and Hydraulic Impacts AJAX PROJECT Environmental Assessment Certificate Application / Environmental Impact Statement for a Comprehensive Study www.knightpiesold.com MEMORANDUM To: Stephanie Eagen Date: July 20, 2015 File No.: VA101-246/35-A.01 From: Toby Perkins Cont. No.: VA15-02874 Re: Ajax Project - Thompson River Hydrologic and Hydraulic Impacts The purpose of this memorandum is present the results of assessment of potential changes in hydrology and hydraulics on the Thompson River downstream from the outlet of Kamloops Lake due to the proposed Ajax Project. Flow reductions, particularly during low flow periods, have the potential to impact fish habitat. The Project will affect Thompson River flows due to a water withdrawal of 1505 m3/hr (0.42 m3/s) from Kamloops Lake and flow reductions in Peterson Creek due to mine activities. This memorandum is a revision of the work completed by Knight Piésold Ltd. (KP) on March 18, 2013 (KP cont. no. VA13-00493), which assessed the effects of a Kamloops lake water withdrawal of 2000 m3/hr (0.56 m3/s). Hydrology The Project is located in the Thompson River Valley on the south side of Kamloops Lake. The hydrology of the Thompson River was assessed based on Water Survey of Canada (WSC) data available for the Thompson River. The Project location and the locations of relevant WSC gauging stations are shown on Figure 1. Details of these WSC stations are summarized in Table 1. The WSC operated a gauge on the Thompson River near Savona (08LF033), near the outlet of Kamloops Lake, between 1926 and 1966.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigations Into the Ethnographic and Prehistoric Importance of Freshwater Molluscs on the Interior Plateau of British Columbia
    INVESTIGATIONS INTO THE ETHNOGRAPHIC AND PREHISTORIC IMPORTANCE OF FRESHWATER MOLLUSCS ON THE INTERIOR PLATEAU OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Corene T. Lindsay B.A., Simon Fraser University, 2000 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS In the Department of Archaeology O Corene T. Lindsay SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY December 2003 All rights reserved. This work may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author. APPROVAL NAME: Corene Texada Lindsay DEGREE: M.A. TITLE OF THESIS Investigations into the Ethnographic and Prehistoric Importance of Freshwater Shellfish on the Interior Plateau of British Columbia EXAMINING COMMITTEE: Chair: Dr. D.S. Lepofsky Associate Professor Dr. G>. ~aolas:~&ciai&hfesG Senior Supervisor hr.~k. Driver, Professor - - - Dr. C.C. Carlson, Associate Professor Anthropology, University of the Cariboo M.K. Rousseau, President Antiquus Archaeological Consultants Ltd Examiner Date Approved: PARTIAL COPYRIGHT LICENSE I HEREBY GRANT TO SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY THE RIGHT TO LEND MY THESIS, PROJECT OR EXTENDED ESSAY (THE TITLE OF WHICH IS SHOWN BELOW) TO USERS OF THE SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY LIBRARY, AND TO MAKE PARTIAL OR SINGLE COPIES ONLY FOR SUCH USERS OR IN RESPONSE TO A REQUEST FROM THE LIBRARY OF ANY OTHER UNIVERSITY, OR OTHER EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION, ON ITS OWN BEHALF OR FOR ONE OF ITS USERS. I FURTHER AGREE THAT PERMISSION FOR MULTIPLE COPYING OF THIS WORK FOR SCHOLARLY PURPOSES MAY BE GRANTED BY ME OR THE DEAN OF GRADUATE STUDIES. IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT COPYING OR PUBLICATION OF THIS WORK FOR FINANCIAL GAIN SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED WITHOUT MY WRITTEN PERMISSION.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Water Quality Monitoring Plan for the Shuswap Lakes, BC
    Final Report November 7th 2010 Integrated Water Quality Monitoring Plan for the Shuswap Lakes, BC Prepared for the: Fraser Basin Council Kamloops, BC Integrated Water Quality Monitoring Plan for the Shuswap Lakes, BC Prepared for the: Fraser Basin Council Kamloops, BC Prepared by: Northwest Hydraulic Consultants Ltd. 30 Gostick Place North Vancouver, BC V7M 3G3 Final Report November 7th 2010 Project 35138 DISCLAIMER This document has been prepared by Northwest Hydraulic Consultants Ltd. in accordance with generally accepted engineering and geoscience practices and is intended for the exclusive use and benefit of the client for whom it was prepared and for the particular purpose for which it was prepared. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. Northwest Hydraulic Consultants Ltd. and its officers, directors, employees, and agents assume no responsibility for the reliance upon this document or any of its contents by any party other than the client for whom the document was prepared. The contents of this document are not to be relied upon or used, in whole or in part, by or for the benefit of others without specific written authorization from Northwest Hydraulic Consultants Ltd. and our client. Report prepared by: Ken I. Ashley, Ph.D., Senior Scientist Ken J. Hall, Ph.D. Associate Report reviewed by: Barry Chilibeck, P.Eng. Principal Engineer NHC. 2010. Integrated Water Quality Monitoring Plan for the Shuswap Lakes, BC. Prepared for the Fraser Basin Council. November 7thth, 2010. © copyright 2010 Shuswap Lake Integrated Water Quality Monitoring Plan i CREDITS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to acknowledge to Mike Crowe (DFO, Kamloops), Ian McGregor (Ministry of Environment, Kamloops), Phil Hallinan (Fraser Basin Council, Kamloops) and Ray Nadeau (Shuswap Water Action Team Society) for supporting the development of the Shuswap Lakes water quality monitoring plan.
    [Show full text]
  • North Thompson Official Community Plan
    Schedule “A” to Bylaw 2700 North Thompson Official Community Plan Foreword and Acknowledgements The North Thompson Official Community Plan is the outcome of over two years of research, public participation and planning. The Regional District is grateful to all those residents and groups who provided interest, passion, and support from all corners of the Plan area culminating in the Plan development. In particular, we wish to recognize the following people for the exceptional amount of time and energy they dedicated to the planning process. OCP Advisory Committee Director Carol Schaffer, Electoral Area “A” Director Stephen Quinn, Electoral Area “B” Director Bill Kershaw, Electoral Area “O” Tom Eustache – Simpcw First Nation Rick Dee Harley Wright Willow Macdonald (past member) Meetings, Conversations and Information Providers Anna Kay Eldridge – Simpcw First Nation Ashley Dyck – Planning Services Celia Nord – Little Shuswap Indian Band Chris Ortner Dan Winiski Doris Laner – North Thompson Arts Council James Demens and Brandon Gustafsen – Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure Jenny Green and Clare Audet – Interior Health Authority Kelly Funk – Kelly Funk Photography Laura Ryser – Research Manager, Rural and Small Town Studies Program, UNBC Leanne Nystoruk Mike Scarff, TNRD GIS Services PIBC and the Planners from the local Interior Chapter Sarah Cooke and Mike Cloet – Ministry of Mines, Energy and Petroleum Resources Staff and students at Clearwater and Barriere Secondary Schools Staff from the Agricultural Land Commission Staff
    [Show full text]
  • Independent Review of the Science and Management of Thompson River Steelhead
    Independent Review of the Science and Management of Thompson River Steelhead Prepared for: Thompson Steelhead Technical Subcommittee c/o Cooks Ferry Indian Band PO Box 130, Spence's Bridge, BC Canada V0K 2L0 March, 2014 Independent Review of the Science and Management of Thompson River Steelhead David A. Levy and Eric Parkinson Levy Research Services Ltd. 315 Lonsdale Ave. North Vancouver, B.C. Canada V7M 2G3 March 2014 ______________________ Recommended citation for this report: Levy, D.A. and E. Parkinson. 2014. Independent review of the science and management of Thompson River steelhead. Prepared for Thompson Steelhead Technical Subcommittee c/o Cook's Ferry Indian Band, Spences Bridge, BC. 104p. Executive Summary In response to the decline in steelhead productivity that has been occurring since the early 1990's, the Thompson Steelhead Technical Subcommittee commissioned the present report to evaluate steelhead status, causes for the decline, effectiveness of management tools and prospects for recovery. The work was motivated by a strong desire among Thompson River First Nations to develop a sound conservation strategy that ensures long-term sustainability and a recovery of the traditional food, social and ceremonial fishery. Thompson River steelhead support a world-class recreational fishery which is managed by the Province of BC. DFO is intimately involved in the management process by developing salmon harvest regulations to mitigate commercial by-catch mortality. First Nations are largely outside of the management process and meaningful consultations have been absent to date. Science and management tools included harvest analysis, juvenile assessment, forecasting procedures, spawner enumeration and enhancement. Conservation thresholds place steelhead numbers in the conservation concern zone in most years.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Prehistoric Cultural Horizons on the Canadian Plateau
    LATE PREHISTORIC CULTURAL HORIZONS ON THE CANADIAN PLATEAU Department of Archaeology Thomas H. Richards Simon Fraser University Michael K. Rousseau Publication Number 16 1987 Archaeology Press Simon Fraser University Burnaby, B.C. PUBLICATIONS COMMITTEE Roy L. Carlson (Chairman) Knut R. Fladmark Brian Hayden Philip M. Hobler Jack D. Nance Erie Nelson All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. ISBN 0-86491-077-0 PRINTED IN CANADA The Department of Archaeology publishes papers and monographs which relate to its teaching and research interests. Communications concerning publications should be directed to the Chairman of the Publications Committee. © Copyright 1987 Department of Archaeology Simon Fraser University Late Prehistoric Cultural Horizons on the Canadian Plateau by Thomas H. Richards and Michael K. Rousseau Department of Archaeology Simon Fraser University Publication Number 16 1987 Burnaby, British Columbia We respectfully dedicate this volume to the memory of CHARLES E. BORDEN (1905-1978) the father of British Columbia archaeology. 11 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Acknowledgements.................................................................................................................................vii List of Figures.....................................................................................................................................iv
    [Show full text]
  • Columbia River Crossing I-5 Immersed Tunnel I-5 Immersed Tunnel Advantages Immersed Tunnel
    6 Sections 500 feet long x 170 feet wide 3,000 ft. Columbia River Crossing I-5 Immersed Tunnel I-5 Immersed Tunnel Advantages Immersed Tunnel Navigation clearances Aviation clearances No freeway noise on river front No mile-long elevated bridge ramps dividing Vancouver Aberdeen Casting Basin 165 x 910 feet Baltimore's Fort McHenry Tunnel Completed 1985 1.4 miles 8 lanes – 4 tubes 115,000 vehicles/day I-95 Immersed Tunnel saved Baltimore’s Inner Harbor 1985 1959 freeway plan Vancouver’s Massey Tunnel under Fraser River October 14, 2019 Vancouver’s Fraser River Bridge replaced by Tunnel 10 lanes April 1, 2020 Vancouver’s Columbia River Bridge replaced by Tunnel Øresund Bridge 20 sections x 577ft = 2.2miles & Tunnel 1999 138ft wide Øresund Tunnel Section 20 sections x 577ft =2.2miles 138ft wide Columbia River Tunnel Section 6 sections x 500ft = 0.6miles 170ft wide Immersed Tunnels About six 500 foot immersed tunnel sections could be a simple, elegant, and cost effective solution to the I-5 Columbia River Crossing. The Aberdeen Casting Basin used to build the SR 520 bridge pontoons would be well suited to casting tunnel sections. https://www.wsdot.wa.gov/sites/default/files/2014/11/12/SR520-Factsheet-Pontoons- February2017.pdf In 1985 Baltimore completed the Fort McHenry Immersed Tunnel and saved its famous Inner Harbor from encirclement by I-95 concrete bridge. https://www.baltimorebrew.com/2011/04/29/the-senator-and-the-highway/ Vancouver, Canada rejected a ten lane bridge over the Fraser in favor of an immersed tunnel. https://www.enr.com/blogs/15-evergreen/post/47724-vancouvers-george-massey- tunnel-replacement-may-now-be-a-tunnel-instead-of-a-bridge The 1999 Oresund Bridge & Immersed Tunnel connects Sweden to Denmark.
    [Show full text]
  • I FUNDING WATER UTILITY SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS in RURAL BRITISH COLUMBIA: HOW MUCH ARE RESIDENTS WILLING to PAY? by Robert A. Macia
    FUNDING WATER UTILITY SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS IN RURAL BRITISH COLUMBIA: HOW MUCH ARE RESIDENTS WILLING TO PAY? by Robert A. Maciak M. Sc. Thompson Rivers University, 2011 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Master of Science in Environmental Science Thompson Rivers University Winter Convocation 2012 © Robert A. Maciak, 2011 i SIGNATURE PAGE Thesis Supervisory Committee ________________________ Dr. Peter Tsigaris, Supervisor ________________________ Dr. Tom Waldichuk, Committee Member ________________________ Dr. Laura Lamb, Committee Member ________________________ Dr. Rita Winkler, Committee Member This thesis by ROBERT A. MACIAK was defended successfully in an oral examination on January 5, 2011by a committee comprising: ________________________ Dr. Carlyle Ross, External Reader ________________________ Dr. Rita Winkler, Internal Reader ________________________ Dr. Peter Tsigaris, Supervisor _________________________ Dr. Karl Larsen, Chair/Coordinator of Graduate Program Committee _________________________ Dr. Tom Dickinson, Dean ________________________ Dr. Peter Tsigaris, Chair of the examining committee This thesis is accepted in its present form by the Office of the Associate Vice President, Research and Graduate Studies as satisfying the thesis requirements for the degree MASTER OF SCIENCE IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE. …………………………………………. Dr. Donald Noakes Associate Vice President, Research and Graduate Studies ii I, Robert A. Maciak, grant non-exclusive permission to the University Librarian of Thompson Rivers University to reproduce, loan or distribute copies of my thesis in microform, paper or electronic formats on a non-profit, royalty-free basis for the full term of copyright protection. I, however, retain the copyright in my thesis. ______________________________ Author ______________________________ Supervisor ______________________________ Date iii DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to my friends, family, and most importantly to my son, Travis.
    [Show full text]
  • The Skagit-High Ross Controversy: Negotiation and Settlement
    Volume 26 Issue 2 U.S. - Canada Transboundary Resource Issues Spring 1986 The Skagit-High Ross Controversy: Negotiation and Settlement Jackie Krolopp Kirn Marion E. Marts Recommended Citation Jackie K. Kirn & Marion E. Marts, The Skagit-High Ross Controversy: Negotiation and Settlement, 26 Nat. Resources J. 261 (1986). Available at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol26/iss2/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Natural Resources Journal by an authorized editor of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. JACKIE KROLOPP KIRN* and MARION E. MARTS** The Skagit-High Ross Controversy: Negotiation and Settlement SETTING AND BACKGROUND The Skagit River is a short but powerful stream which rises in the mountains of southwestern British Columbia, cuts through the northern Cascades in a spectacular and once-remote mountain gorge, and empties into Puget Sound approximately sixty miles north of Seattle. The beautiful mountain scenery of the heavily glaciated north Cascades was formally recognized in the United States by the creation of the North Cascades National Park and the Ross Lake National Recreation Area in 1968, and earlier in British Columbia by creation of the E.C. Manning Provincial Park. The Ross Lake Recreation Area covers the narrow valley of the upper Skagit River in Washington and portions of several tributary valleys. It was created as a political and, to environmentalists who wanted national park status for the entire area, controversial, compromise which accom- modated the city of Seattle's Skagit River Project and the then-planned North Cascades Highway.
    [Show full text]
  • Order of the Executive Director May 14, 2020
    PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Park Act Order of the Executive Director TO: Public Notice DATE: May 14, 2020 WHEREAS: A. This Order applies to all Crown land established or continued as a park, conservancy, recreation area, or ecological reserve under the Park Act, the Protected Areas of British Columbia Act or protected areas established under provisions of the Environment and Land Use Act. B. This Order is made in the public interest in response to the COVID-19 pandemic for the purposes of the protection of human health and safety. C. This Order is in regard to all public access, facilities or uses that exist in any of the lands mentioned in Section A above, and includes but is not limited to: campgrounds, day-use areas, trails, playgrounds, shelters, visitor centers, cabins, chalets, lodges, resort areas, group campsites, and all other facilities or lands owned or operated by or on behalf of BC Parks. D. This Order is in replacement of the Order of the Executive Director dated April 8, 2020 and is subject to further amendment, revocation or repeal as necessary to respond to changing circumstances around the COVID-19 pandemic. Exemptions that were issued in relation to the previous Order, and were still in effect, are carried forward and applied to this Order in the same manner and effect. Province of British Columbia Park Act Order of the Executive Director 1 E. The protection of park visitor health, the health of all BC Parks staff, Park Operators, contractors and permittees is the primary consideration in the making of this Order.
    [Show full text]