DOCSLIB.ORG

Jaspers Annual Report 2013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

2013 Jaspers Annual Report European Investment Bank 98 -100, boulevard Konrad Adenauer L-2950 Luxembourg 3 +352 4379-1 5 +352 437704 www.eib.org – U [email protected] Jaspers Annual Report 2013 www.jaspers-europa-info.org Jaspers Annual Report 2013 © EIB – 05/2014 – QH-AN-14-001-EN-C – ISBN 978-92-861-2017-6 – ISSN 1831-3086 – doi:10.2867/5487 – EIB GraphicTeam Contents The Warsaw Water Supply and Sewerage Phase 4 project is one of the largest water and wastewater projects supported by JASPERS in the 2007-2013 programming period (EUR 404.5 million in total cost). JASPERS completed this assignment in December 2013. 2 Activity report 4 Overview 6 JASPERS milestones in the 2007-2013 programming period 10 Institutional issues 12 Organisational development 14 Operational activities 18 Detailed commentary by sector 30 Financial information 31 The budget for 2013 31 Income, expenditure and payments received 32 Annexes 34 Human resources at 31 December 2013 35 JASPERS assignments by country and by sector, 31 December 2013 36 Detailed assignments completed in 2013 41 List of JASPERS-supported major projects approved by the European Commission in 2013 43 Funding from the European Commission and national budgets, in EUR million, for JASPERS-supported applications approved in 2013 43 Summary of assignments completed since 2006 (EU-14) 44 Summary financial statement 2013 45 JASPERS' activity in FYROM, Montenegro and Serbia 2013 Jaspers Annual Report 1 JASPERS (Joint Assistance to Support Projects in European Regions) is a partnership between the European Commission (DG Regional Policy), the European Investment Bank (EIB) and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD). KfW also supported JASPERS from 2008 to 2013. 2 Jaspers Annual Report 2013 Activity report Activity report n 2013 JASPERS provided advice to 14 EU Mem- ber States and three Candidate Countries dur- Iing project preparation to help improve the quality of the major projects to be submitted for grant financing from the EU Structural and Cohe- sion Funds. JASPERS' assistance covers project review and rec- ommendations, horizontal tasks, strategic sup- port, capacity building and implementation support. JASPERS’ headquarters are in Luxembourg, with offices in Bucharest, Vienna, Warsaw and Sofia. 2013 Jaspers Annual Report 3 Overview Rehabilitation of EC-1 Power Station in Lodz (Poland) for cultural and artistic purposes: this project, assisted by JASPERS, was submitted to and approved by the Commission in 2013. 4 Jaspers Annual Report 2013 Activity report n 2013 JASPERS completed 138 assignments for In 2013, the Commission approved 86 applications EU Member States, compared to 116 in 2012. for funding, compared to 53 in 2012, and national I At end-December 2013, 795 assignments had authorities approved a further 18 JASPERS- been completed since JASPERS began operations supported non-major projects during the year. in late 2006 and 413 assignments were receiving assistance in all JASPERS EU beneficiary countries JASPERS supported 69% of the applications sub- and in all sectors of activity, compared to 347 as at mitted to the Commission from the 14 EU benefi- 31 December 20121. ciary Member States and 70% of those which were approved in 2013. In 2013, major projects (above EUR 50 million total cost) accounted for some 68% of the active assign- The total investment cost for the major projects ments and non-major projects and horizontal as- supported by JASPERS which were approved by signments for some 32%. the Commission from 2007 to 2013 was EUR 55.9 billion, of which EU grants accounted for In 2013, the 14 beneficiary EU Member States sub- EUR 32.2 billion. mitted to the Commission 89 JASPERS-supported applications for EU funding under the Structural and Cohesion Funds, compared with 76 the year before. 1 The JASPERS portfolio at end-2013, a detailed list of assignments completed in 2013, a summary of the assignments completed since 2006 (EU-14), and a list of the JASPERS-supported major projects approved by the EC in 2013 are available in Annexes 2, 3, 6 and 4. Annexes 3 and 6 also specify the type of assignment (small/major/horizontal or capacity building). Table 1: JASPERS’ performance Total 2006 to date 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Number of assignments 795 3 22 82 133 159 142 116 completed 138 Number of JASPERS- supported applications 407 0 5 30 59 86 62 76 submitted to the 89 Commission Number of JASPERS- supported applications 310 0 0 10 35 58 68 53 approved by the 86 Commission 2013 Jaspers Annual Report 5 JASPERS milestones in the 2007-2013 programming period 2013 marks the end of the 2007-2013 programming period. The following section records the main developments in JASPERS during this period. On 30 May 2006, the European Commission, the EIB and that had joined the European Union in 2004 (Cyprus, the EBRD signed a Memorandum of Understanding con- Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, cerning JASPERS, as well as a Contribution Agreement Malta, Poland, Slovakia and Slovenia) and in the two that specifying objectives, procedures for operations, gov- would join in 2007 (Bulgaria and Romania). At the end of ernance and financial aspects. the 2007-2013 programming period, JASPERS had grown to be a much bigger and more complex structure, active In late 2006, when it began operations, JASPERS had a in 17 countries, with a staff of 87, with its headquarters in staff of 16, it was based only in Luxembourg and was ac- Luxembourg and offices in Bucharest, Vienna, Warsaw tive in the 10 Central and Eastern European countries and Sofia. JASPERS’ beneficiaries are 14 EU Member States (Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Greece, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia) and three Candidate Countries (the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia) receiving assistance from the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA). JASPERS supports projects in the following sectors: roads, air, maritime and public transport, knowledge economy and energy, water and waste. 6 Jaspers Annual Report 2013 Activity report 2006-2007 staff evolution JASPERS milestones 88 89 89 87 in the 2007-2013 programming period 77 60 56 16 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2007 2008 2009 • JASPERS office in Warsaw, covering • Germany’s Kreditanstalt für • At the request of EU Member States, operations in Poland, Estonia, Latvia and Wiederaufbau (KfW) joined JASPERS on JASPERS could provide assistance to Lithuania, opened on 12 January 2007 by 1 July. a limited number of specific projects EU Commissioner Danuta Hübner, EIB during the early stages of their • New JASPERS website President Philippe Maystadt and EBRD implementation. http://www.jaspers-europa-info.org Secretary General Horst Reichenbach. created. • First JASPERS Stakeholders meeting • JASPERS office in Vienna, covering (Krakow, 28-29 May) with • JASPERS given a new matrix structure operations in the Czech Republic, representatives from beneficiary and, as of 1 March, included for Hungary, Slovakia and Slovenia, opened countries. Participants compared their administrative purposes in the Projects on 2 May 2007 by DG Regional Policy experience of working with JASPERS Directorate of the EIB as a separate Director General Dirk Ahner, EIB Vice- and presented case studies in different department. President Matthias Kollatz-Ahnen and sectors. Alexander Auboeck, Business Group • As part of the economic recovery Director of EBRD. package announced on 28 November, the Commission’s contribution to • JASPERS office in Bucharest, covering JASPERS to be increased by 25% over operations in Romania and Bulgaria, the 2008 level from 2009 onwards. This opened on 7 June 2007 by Messrs Ahner, was to be matched by a pro rata Kollatz-Ahnen and Auboeck. increase in the EIB’s contribution in kind • Urban infrastructure sector created with to JASPERS. effect from 1 September 2007. 2013 Jaspers Annual Report 7 € € € € 31.9 30.4 31.6 30.2 JASPERS budget € from 2006 through 23.5 € 2013 (EUR million) € 21.2 17.8 € 3.6 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2010 2011 • Second JASPERS Stakeholders meeting (Sofia, 17 June) • Third Stakeholders meeting (Budapest, 7-8 April) discussed measures to reduce time for submission and discussed measures to improve the quality of approval of grant application. JASPERS asked to start submissions as well as streamlining the application work at an early stage on project preparation for the process and the role of JASPERS after 2013. 2014-2020 financial perspective, to step up its support • June Steering Committee approved JASPERS’ strategy for capacity building and expand support for project after 2013: JASPERS would continue operating in the implementation. 2014-2020 period; a review exercise would be carried • November Steering Committee meeting agreed on out in 2017 to assess progress of Member States towards new strategy for JASPERS’ activities through to 2013. achieving sufficient internal capacity for project Core focus to remain on support for project preparation preparation. for the 2007-2013 period, but as resources became • Core objectives post-2013: to improve project quality, available, additional emphasis would be placed on the timeliness of project preparation, approval process, preparation of projects for the 2014-2020 programming capacity building; assistance for implementation aimed period. at speeding up absorption in specific areas; and to • Information on completed assignments by country provide a networking platform to exchange information made available on JASPERS’ website. on project-specific issues between and across Member States. • November Steering Committee meeting agreed that JASPERS would start to operate in the IPA region, beginning with the Candidate Countries (Croatia, Turkey, FYROM, Montenegro and Serbia if granted candidate status), to help these countries build up capacity to prepare projects for funding under the Structural Funds. JASPERS would assist them in the preparation of sound major projects (more than EUR 10 million total cost for IPA) in the transport and environment sectors under the regional development component of the IPA instrument.
Recommended publications
  • Pozsony a Zene Városa

    Pozsony a Zene Városa

    M2019. JÚLIUS XXIII. évf. 2. szám ZAIK O A COLAS CSOPORT MAGAZINJA Találkozási pont POZSONY A ZENE VÁROSA INTERJÚ GUILLAUME MOUNIER-VEL ÚJRAINDULT A TISZATARJÁNI BÁNYA ZAJLIK A MUNKA AZ AUTÓPÁLYÁKON A Colas Europe munkavédelmi vezetőjével Közel három év szünet után a Colas Északkő Számos gyorsforgalmi útszakaszon nagy erőkkel a legújabb kampányokról is beszélgettünk. ismét megindította a termelést. dolgozunk. MOZAIK 2019. JÚLIUS XXIII. ÉVF. 2. SZÁM 1 Az én apukám is itt dolgozik! FÓKUSZBAN OLDALSZÁM 2–13 40 >> Hírek >> Interjú Guillaume Mounier-vel >> Interjú Görbedi Lászlóval >> Interjú Dudás Istvánnal FOTÓPÁLYÁZAT >> Újraindult a tiszatarjáni bánya >> Segítségnyújtás az M25-ös autóútnál MUNKÁINK OLDALSZÁM 14–29 >> Hídépítési munkák Nyugat-Magyarországon >> Próbaüzem Pincehelyen >> Burkolatfelújítás az M1-es autópályán >> Kecskeméten dolgozik a Colas Út >> Forgalomba helyeztük a turbó körforgalmat az 51-es úton >> Készül az M30-as autópálya 14 46 utolsó szakasza >> Folytatódik a munka az M4-esen MUNKATÁRSAINK OLDALSZÁM 30–37 >> Portrék SAFETY OLDALSZÁM 38–39 >> Az én apukám is itt dolgozik Fotózd le a kampány- KITEKINTŐ OLDALSZÁM 40–43 logót valamilyen kreatív >> Találkozási pont: Pozsony >> „Hogy lehet így futni?!” Ultrabalaton 2019 formában és 14 HÍDÉPÍTÉSI MUNKÁK NYUGAT-MAGYARORSZÁGON A dunántúli hídépítő főmérnökség csapatáról, eddigi eredményeiről – töltsd fel az Instagramra és jelenlegi munkáiról. TECHNOLÓGIA ÉS GÉPÉSZET OLDALSZÁM 44–49 #mydadworksherecontest >> Pályaszerkezetek méretezése 40 TALÁLKOZÁSI PONT: POZSONY >> Keverőtelepek korszerűbben hashtaggel Szlovákia fővárosa alig két és fél óra közúton, és számtalan >> Bányabemutató: Nógrádkövesd – vagy küldd el a fotód izgalmas látnivalót kínál. (Szanda-bánya) a [email protected] 46 KEVERŐTELEPEK KORSZERŰBBEN BESZÁMOLÓ OLDALSZÁM 50–54 Felsőzsolcára új keverő érkezett, a korábbi berendezés e-mail-címre. >> Családi nap a Vasúttörténeti Parkban Jánosházára került.
  • Information Current As of November 18, 2020

    Information Current As of November 18, 2020

    Information Current as of November 18, 2020 Table of Contents SOURCEREE PERSPECTIVE ............................................................................................3 OVERVIEW .........................................................................................................................6 WEBSITES ...........................................................................................................................6 OWNERSHIP .......................................................................................................................6 OBJECTIVES ......................................................................................................................6 FINANCIAL INTENTIONS .................................................................................................7 THE EFFECT ON AMERICA .............................................................................................8 ECONOMIC CORRIDORS .................................................................................................9 FUNDING .......................................................................................................................... 11 APPENDIX A: PROGRAM LEADERSHIP ....................................................................... 16 APPENDIX B: ASSOCIATED ENTITIES ......................................................................... 18 APPENDIX C: PARTICIPATING NATIONS.................................................................... 21 APPENDIX D: PROJECTS ...............................................................................................
  • Act Cciii of 2011 on the Elections of Members Of

    Act Cciii of 2011 on the Elections of Members Of

    Strasbourg, 15 March 2012 CDL-REF(2012)003 Opinion No. 662 / 2012 Engl. only EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) ACT CCIII OF 2011 ON THE ELECTIONS OF MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT OF HUNGARY This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int CDL-REF(2012)003 - 2 - The Parliament - relying on Hungary’s legislative traditions based on popular representation; - guaranteeing that in Hungary the source of public power shall be the people, which shall pri- marily exercise its power through its elected representatives in elections which shall ensure the free expression of the will of voters; - ensuring the right of voters to universal and equal suffrage as well as to direct and secret bal- lot; - considering that political parties shall contribute to creating and expressing the will of the peo- ple; - recognising that the nationalities living in Hungary shall be constituent parts of the State and shall have the right ensured by the Fundamental Law to take part in the work of Parliament; - guaranteeing furthermore that Hungarian citizens living beyond the borders of Hungary shall be a part of the political community; in order to enforce the Fundamental Law, pursuant to Article XXIII, Subsections (1), (4) and (6), and to Article 2, Subsections (1) and (2) of the Fundamental Law, hereby passes the following Act on the substantive rules for the elections of Hungary’s Members of Parliament: 1. Interpretive provisions Section 1 For the purposes of this Act: Residence: the residence defined by the Act on the Registration of the Personal Data and Resi- dence of Citizens; in the case of citizens without residence, their current addresses.
  • JASPERS Annual Report 2007

    JASPERS Annual Report 2007

    Annual Report 2007 Jaspers Joint Assistance to Support Projects in European Regions • Jaspers Joint Assistance to Support Projects in European Regions JASPERS Joint Assistance to Support Projects in European Regions JASPERS 2 Joint Assistance to Support Projects in European Regions Annual Report 2007 Joint Assistance to Support Projects in European Regions Annual Report 2007 3 JASPERS Index I. Narrative report 4 ➾ 1. Institutional issues and organisation 4 ➾ 2. Organisational development 4 ➾ 3. Operational activities 8 ➾ 4. Detailed commentary by sector 12 II. Financial information 17 ➾ 1. The budget of year 2007 17 ➾ 2. Summary of the Action: income and expenditure and payments received 17 Appendices 18 ➾ 1. Human Resources as of December 31, 2007 18 ➾ 2. Status of JASPERS assignments as of December 31, 2007 19 ➾ 3. JASPERS assignment list as at December 31, 2007 21 ➾ 4. JASPERS cumulative assignments and outcomes to December 31, 2007 25 ➾ 5. List of completed assignments 2007 per country and per sector 27 ➾ 6. Financial statement of the “Action / JASPERS” for the year to December 31, 2007 28 JASPERS 4 Joint Assistance to Support Projects in European Regions Annual Report 2007 I. Narrative report This is the Annual Report for 2007 which was an important year for JASPERS since it was the first full year of operations. There was a significant build-up in staffing throughout the year, bring- ing the number of professional staff close to the total number of technical experts envisaged by the stakeholders when JASPERS was established. 1. Institutional issues and organisation 2. Organisational development 1.1 Governance and reporting 2.1 JASPERS recruitment and staffing Meetings of the Steering Committee comprising Following an intensive screening process in the lat- representatives of the three stakeholders (European er stages of 2006, interviews for the majority of the Commission, European Investment Bank and Euro- 32 Technical Expert posts funded by the European pean Bank for Reconstruction and Development) Commission were completed by March 2007.
  • River Capacity Improvement and Partial Floodplain Reactivation Along the Middle-Tisza SCENARIO ANALYSIS of INTERVENTION OPTIONS

    River Capacity Improvement and Partial Floodplain Reactivation Along the Middle-Tisza SCENARIO ANALYSIS of INTERVENTION OPTIONS

    Integrated Flood Risk Analysis and Management Methodologies River capacity improvement and partial floodplain reactivation along the Middle-Tisza SCENARIO ANALYSIS OF INTERVENTION OPTIONS Date February 2007 Report Number T22-07-01 Revision Number 1_3_P01 Deliverable Number: D22.2 Actual submission date: February 2007 Task Leader HEURAqua / VITUKI FLOODsite is co-funded by the European Community Sixth Framework Programme for European Research and Technological Development (2002-2006) FLOODsite is an Integrated Project in the Global Change and Eco-systems Sub-Priority Start date March 2004, duration 5 Years Document Dissemination Level PU Public PU PP Restricted to other programme participants (including the Commission Services) RE Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including the Commission Services) CO Confidential, only for members of the consortium (including the Commission Services) Co-ordinator: HR Wallingford, UK Project Contract No: GOCE-CT-2004-505420 Project website: www.floodsite.net River capacity – Scenario analysis D22.2 Contract No:GOCE-CT-2004-505420 DOCUMENT INFORMATION River capacity improvement and partial floodplain reactivation along Title the Middle-Tisza – Scenario analysis of intervention options Lead Author Sándor Tóth (HEURAqua) Contributors Dr. Sándor Kovács (Middle-Tisza DEWD, Szolnok, HU) Distribution Public Document Reference T22-07-01 DOCUMENT HISTORY Date Revision Prepared by Organisation Approved by Notes 23/01/07 1.0 S. Toth HEURAqua 15/02/07 1.1 S. Kovacs M-T DEWD Sub-contractor 04/03/07 1.2 S. Toth HEURAqua 22/05/09 1_3_P01 J Rance HR Formatting for Wallingford publication ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The work described in this publication was supported by the European Community’s Sixth Framework Programme through the grant to the budget of the Integrated Project FLOODsite, Contract GOCE-CT- 2004-505420.
  • List of Beneficiaries - FOP Priority Axis II

    List of Beneficiaries - FOP Priority Axis II

    List of beneficiaries - FOP priority axis II. (1st June 2016) Region County Office Site Project identifier Name of beneficiary Measure Amount of support HUF Measure 2.1. To ensure sustainability and competitiveness ofaquaculture and inland Dél-Alföld Bács-Kiskun Akasztó Akasztó 1098982557 Szabó Róbert István fishery 7 268 549 Measure 2.1. To ensure sustainability and competitiveness ofaquaculture and inland Dél-Alföld Bács-Kiskun Akasztó Akasztó 1099160437 Szabó József fishery 185 462 209 Measure 2.1. To ensure sustainability and competitiveness ofaquaculture and inland Dél-Alföld Bács-Kiskun Akasztó Akasztó 1099219685 Czobor-Szabó Andrea fishery 12 491 533 Measure 2.1. To ensure sustainability and competitiveness ofaquaculture and inland Dél-Alföld Bács-Kiskun Akasztó Akasztó 1220394092 Szabó József fishery 116 427 879 Measure 2.1. To ensure sustainability and competitiveness ofaquaculture and inland Dél-Alföld Bács-Kiskun Akasztó Akasztó 1403233732 Szabó József fishery 121 133 947 Measure 2.1. To ensure sustainability and competitiveness ofaquaculture and inland Dél-Alföld Bács-Kiskun Akasztó Akasztó 1534862007 Szabó József fishery 112 680 361 Measure 2.1. To ensure sustainability and competitiveness ofaquaculture and inland Dél-Alföld Bács-Kiskun Akasztó Akasztó 1551073172 Szabó József fishery 14 565 813 Measure 2.1. To ensure sustainability and competitiveness ofaquaculture and inland Dél-Alföld Bács-Kiskun Akasztó Akasztó 1697255443 Szabó József fishery 48 224 816 Measure 2.1. To ensure sustainability and competitiveness ofaquaculture and inland Dél-Alföld Bács-Kiskun Akasztó Akasztó 1750982217 Szabó József fishery 21 641 331 Measure 2.1. To ensure sustainability and competitiveness ofaquaculture and inland Dél-Alföld Bács-Kiskun Dunatetétlen Akasztó 1624017586 Turu János fishery 7 153 285 Measure 2.1.
  • Public-Private Partnerships Financed by the European Investment Bank from 1990 to 2020

    Public-Private Partnerships Financed by the European Investment Bank from 1990 to 2020

    EUROPEAN PPP EXPERTISE CENTRE Public-private partnerships financed by the European Investment Bank from 1990 to 2020 March 2021 Public-private partnerships financed by the European Investment Bank from 1990 to 2020 March 2021 Terms of Use of this Publication The European PPP Expertise Centre (EPEC) is part of the Advisory Services of the European Investment Bank (EIB). It is an initiative that also involves the European Commission, Member States of the EU, Candidate States and certain other States. For more information about EPEC and its membership, please visit www.eib.org/epec. The findings, analyses, interpretations and conclusions contained in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the EIB or any other EPEC member. No EPEC member, including the EIB, accepts any responsibility for the accuracy of the information contained in this publication or any liability for any consequences arising from its use. Reliance on the information provided in this publication is therefore at the sole risk of the user. EPEC authorises the users of this publication to access, download, display, reproduce and print its content subject to the following conditions: (i) when using the content of this document, users should attribute the source of the material and (ii) under no circumstances should there be commercial exploitation of this document or its content. Purpose and Methodology This report is part of EPEC’s work on monitoring developments in the public-private partnership (PPP) market. It is intended to provide an overview of the role played by the EIB in financing PPP projects inside and outside of Europe since 1990.
  • Development Priorities

    Development Priorities

    HIERARCHICAL STRUCTURE OF THE CITIES KOPENHAGA SZTOKHOLSZTOKHOLM Lubmin METROPOLITAN HAMBURG OSLO LUBEKA Greifswald Zinnowitz REGIONAL Wolgast M Dziwnów GDAŃSKRYGA SUBREGIONAL Loitz DEVELOPMENT PRIORITIES SUPRA-LOCAL Heringsdorf Kamień Gutzkow Międzyzdroje Jarmen Pomorski LOCAL Świnoujście the Polish Part of MAIN CONNECTIONS Anklam ROAD CROSS BORDER METROPOLITAN REGION OF Wolin RAILWAY Golczewo ZACHODNIOPOMORSKIE WATER REGION Ducherow NATIONAL ROAD SZCZECIN REGIONAL ROAD Uckermunde Nowe Warpno VIA HANSEATICA Altentreptow Eggesin CETC-ROUTE 65 Friedland Ferdindndshof INTERNATIONAL CYCLING TRAILS Nowogard Torgelow PROTECTED NATURAL AREAS Neubrandenburg Police INLAD AND SEA INFRASTRUCTURE Goleniów THE ASSOCIATION OF SEAPORTS WITH BASIC MEANING FOR NATIONAL ECONOMY THE SZCZECIN METROPOLITAN REGION Burg Stargard SEAPORTS Pasewalk Locknitz SMALL SEAPORTS Woldegk HARBOURS Szczecin MARINAS ACCESS CHANNELS AVIATION INFRASTRUCTURE Feldberg Stargard Szczeciński SZCZECIN-GOLENIÓW AIRPORT Prenzlau WARSZAWA COMMUNICATION AIRPORTS THE CITY OF ŚWINOUJŚCIE PROPOSED AIRPORTS, BASED ON EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE Gryfino Gartz RAILWAY NETWORK - PLANNED SZCZECIN METROPOLITAN RAILWAY LOCAL LINE POSSIBLE CONNECTIONS Templin Pyrzyce TRAIN FERRY ECONOMICAL ACTIVITY ZONES Schwedt POZNAŃ MAIN INDUSTRIAL & SERVICE AREAS WROCŁA THE ASSOCIATION OF POLISH MUNICIPALITIES Angermunde EUROREGION POMERANIA MAIN SPATIAL STRUCTURES AGRICULTURAL Chojna Trzcińsko Zdrój TOURISTIC W Myślibórz SCIENCE AND EDUCATION Cedynia UNIVERSITIES SCHOOLS WITH BILINGUAL DEPARTMENTS Moryń CONFERENCE
  • Connection Between Inland Water Development And

    Connection Between Inland Water Development And

    Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences, February 2016, Vol. 11, No. 1, p. 293 - 301 CONNECTION BETWEEN INLAND EXCESS WATER DEVELOPMENT AND MOTORWAYS Károly BARTA1, József SZATMÁRI1 & Ádám POSTA2 1Department of Physical Geography and Geoinformatics, University of Szeged, 2-6 Egyetem Street, Szeged 6720 Hungary, [email protected] 2Department of Social and Human Geography, University of Szeged, 2-6 Egyetem Street, Szeged 6720 Hungary Abstract: It has been known for a long time that linear infrastructures (railways, roads, embankments) significantly influence surface and subsurface horizontal water movements. Clear evidence can be observed at places where oxbows and abandoned meanders are crossed by roads, while the effect can hardly be shown at lowlands free from linear water drainage forms. This research seeks to answer the question of whether the motorways opened in the last 10 years around Szeged, SE Hungary (M5, M43), have any role in the appearance of extended patterns of inland excess water along certain sections of the motorways. The infiltration conditions of two selected sample sites were determined by soil and geodetic studies and it was also possible to determine the elevation of the groundwater level. The analysis of results underlines the significant effect of linear infrastructures. Inland excess water patterns along the studied highway sections are caused by the motorway M43. Keywords: inland excess water, motorway, groundwater movement, anthropogenic effects, soil compaction 1. INTRODUCTION as being lowest-risk areas on the maps of inland excess water risk and inundation frequency (Bozán The natural drainage networks and et al., 2008; Kozák, 2008; Körösparti et al., 2009; hydrological systems are seriously influenced by Pásztor et al., 2009).
  • Transport Accessibility and Mobility: a Forecast of Changes in the Face of Planned Development of the Network of Expressways and Motorways in Poland

    Transport Accessibility and Mobility: a Forecast of Changes in the Face of Planned Development of the Network of Expressways and Motorways in Poland

    EUROPEAN SPATIAL RESEARCH AND POLICY Volume 26 2019 Number 2 http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/1231-1952.26.2.08 Michał KOWALSKI*, Szymon WIŚNIEWSKI* TRANSPORT ACCESSIBILITY AND MOBILITY: A FORECAST OF CHANGES IN THE FACE OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OF THE NETWORK OF EXPRESSWAYS AND MOTORWAYS IN POLAND Abstract. The article presents a forecast of changes in the level of transport accessibility and mobility in Poland as a result of the anticipated development of the network of expressways and motorways. The progress which has been made in this respect in the last few years in Poland is unquestionable and unrepeatable by any other European country. Will the subsequent invest- ment plans concerning the road network of the highest parameters offer equally impressive results as far as the increase in Poland’s territorial cohesion is concerned? The aim of this article is to establish in what way the planned infrastructure investments will affect the changes in transport accessibility and mobility as well as whether they will result in the changes in traffic flows- di rected to Warsaw and other regional centres. To achieve this, an analysis of the present and target states of the road network in Poland was conducted from the perspective of the changes in ac- cessibility, anticipated traffic flows, and mobility. For this purpose, the authors used the analyses of isochrone and accumulative accessibility in ArcMap environment and the research into traffic flows and their changes in the Visum software. The conducted research showed that the planned transport network might result in induced traffic through an increase in accessibility (the central variant) with the assumption that an increase in mobility would be vented in the real face of the phenomenon of motility.
  • 89,817 Sq M PANATTONI LEGNICA PARK

    89,817 Sq M PANATTONI LEGNICA PARK

    PANATTONI PLANNED AREA: LEGNICA PARK 89,817 sq m Panattoni Park Legnica I offers 27,000 sq m of industrial LEGNICA CITY CENTER PRAGUE WROCŁAW space suitable for light production, logistic and 7 km, 10 min 247 km, 180 min 74 km, 60 min e-commerce activities. BERLIN KATOWICE DRESDEN 132 km, 150 min 250 km, 150 min 200 km, 130 min 2 1 3 JAWORZYŃSKA LOCATION IS KEY SZCZECIN A6 DEVELOPMENT SPACE Panattoni Park Legnica offers 89,817 sq m of A11 industrial space suitable for light production, E65 logistic and e-commerce activities. PL ACCESS BERLIN POZNAN Excellent and easy access to expressway S3 A2/E30 A12 A2/E30 (Szczecin – Legnica – Prague), and highway A4 (Śląsk – Wrocław – Dresden). E65 LOCATION A15 The Park is located in one of the most A13 industrialized and urbanized regions in Central A18/E36 Legnica and Eastern Europe. DE Park LEGNICA A4/E40 LABOR FORCE A4/E40 A4 WROCLAW Available resources of qualified personnel with a DRESDEN total population of 2.9 million inhabitants and 39 PANATTONI LIBEREC S3 LEGNICA PARK higher education institutions in the Voivodship E442 ÚSTÍ NAB LABEM E67 educating over 120,000 students per year. D8/E55 E65 A4 PUBLIC TRANSPORT D10/E65 BTS GATES Existing bus stop is 50m from the Park. LEGNICA D11/E67 PRAGUE OTHER PARK ADVANTAGES CZ The Park is about 58km away from PCC Brzeg Dolny terminal that handles goods flowing into Excellent and easy access to the expressway S3 and out of the Lower Silesia region. And 75 km connecting Szczecin, Legnica and Prague.
  • Településfejlesztési Koncepciója

    Településfejlesztési Koncepciója

    HUNYADFALVA KÖZSÉG TELEPÜLÉSFEJLESZTÉSI KONCEPCIÓJA Kiszelovics Ildikó Egyéni Vállalkozó. Iroda: 5000 Szolnok, Szántó krt. 52. II/5 Tel/fax: 56/343-279 Sz.: 13/2018. HUNYADFALVA KÖZSÉG TELEPÜLÉSFEJLESZTÉSI KONCEPCIÓJA 2019. április hó Kiszelovics Ildikó E.V. - 2019. HUNYADFALVA KÖZSÉG TELEPÜLÉSFEJLESZTÉSI KONCEPCIÓJA Aláírólap Hunyadfalva Község Településfejlesztési Koncepcióhoz Vezető településtervező: ------------------------------ Kiszelovics Ildikó TT-1-16-0238 településmérnök, városépítési városgazdasági szakmérnök Szolnok, 2019. április hó 2 Kiszelovics Ildikó E.V. - 2019. HUNYADFALVA KÖZSÉG TELEPÜLÉSFEJLESZTÉSI KONCEPCIÓJA Tartalomjegyzék Hunyadfalva Község településfejlesztési koncepciójához Bevezetés 1. JÖVŐKÉP 1.1. A település jövőképe a társadalmi, gazdasági, táji, természeti és épített környezetre vonatkozóan 1.2. A település jövőképe a térségi szerepére vonatkozóan 1.3. A településfejlesztési elvek rögzítése 2. CÉLOK 2.1. A település átfogó fejlesztését szolgáló célok megvalósítása 2.2. Részcélok és beavatkozások területei egységének meghatározása 2.2.1. A jövőkép, a településfejlesztési elvek, az átfogó cél és a részcélok kapcsolata 2.2.2. A fejlesztési célok értelmezése az egyes településrészekre 3. KIINDULÓ ADATOK A TOVÁBBI TERVEZÉSI FELADATHOZ 3.1. A stratégiához és a településrendezési eszközök készítéséhez szükséges társadalmi, gazdasági és környezeti adatok meghatározása 3.2. A meghatározott területigényes elemek alapján, javaslat a műszaki infrastruktúra fő elemeinek térbeli rendjének és a terület-felhasználásra irányuló