DOCSLIB.ORG

Evaluation of the Uganda Country Programme 2016-2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evaluation of the Uganda Country Programme 2016-2018 Evaluation of the Uganda Country Programme 2016-2018 Final Evaluation Report External Consultants have prepared this report. The views expressed herein are those of the Consultants and therefore do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of OHCHR. June 2019 Silva Ferretti and Joaquín De la Concha González 1 Composition of the evaluation team Evaluation Team ● Silva Ferretti, International consultant. ● Joaquín de la Concha González, international consultant. Evaluation Manager ● Mr Sabas Monroy, Evaluation Officer, OHCHR Reference Group OHCHR - Headquarters ● Ms. Sylta Georgiadis, Senior Monitoring and Evaluation Officer; ● Ms. Birthe Ankenbrand, Desk Officer for Uganda; ● Mr. Nils Clotteau, Donor and External Relations Officer. OHCHR - Uganda ● Ms. Nicole Bjerler, Deputy Head of the Uganda Country Office; 2 Table of Contents Composition of the evaluation team ................................................................................................. 2 Evaluation Team .......................................................................................................................... 2 Evaluation Manager ...................................................................................................................... 2 Reference Group ......................................................................................................................... 2 Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................... 3 Acronyms ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 2 Background ................................................................................................................................. 2 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 14 Background ................................................................................................................................ 14 Methodology .............................................................................................................................. 19 Main findings .................................................................................................................................. 23 Relevance ................................................................................................................................... 24 Effectiveness ............................................................................................................................... 30 Efficiency .................................................................................................................................... 43 Impact orientation ...................................................................................................................... 50 Sustainability............................................................................................................................... 53 Gender ...................................................................................................................................... 56 Conclusions and recommendations ............................................................................................. 60 Recommendations ...................................................................................................................... 63 3 Acronyms To increase readability we tried to avoid, as much as possible, the use of acronyms. The following are acronyms often found in use in OHCHR documents. AWP Annual Work Plan PPTA Prevention and Prohibition of CAT Convention Against Torture Torture Act CEDAW Convention on the Elimination of RBM Results Based Management All Forms of Discrimination SIDA Swedish International Against Women Development Cooperation Agency CMI Chieftaincy of Military Intelligence SOP Standard Operating Procedures CN Country Note TJ Transitional Justice CO Country Office ToT Training of Trainers CRPD Convention on the Rights of UHRC Uganda Human Rights Commission Persons with Disabilities ULRC Uganda Law Reform Commission CSOs Civil Society Organizations UMWA Uganda Media Women Association DHoO Deputy Head of Office UN United Nations DPP Directorate of Public Prosecutions UNCT United Nations Country Team DSA Daily Subsistence Allowance UNDAF United Nations Development EOC Equal Opportunities Commission Assistance Framework EOY End-of-year report UNDG UN Development Group ESCR Economic, Social and Cultural UNDP UN Development Program Rights UNEG UN Evaluation Group FGD Focus Group Discussion UNESCO UN Educational, Scientific and FOTCD Field Operations and Technical Cultural Organization Cooperation Division UNICEF United Nations Children's Fund HQ Headquarters UPDF Uganda People’s Defence Force HR Human Rights UPF Ugandan Police Force HRBA Human Rights Based Approach UPR Universal Periodic Review HRDs Human Rights Defenders WHRDs Women Human Right Defenders HRV Human Rights Violations ICCPR International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights ICESCR International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights IDP Internally Displaced People JLOS Justice, Law and Order Sector KAP Knowledge, Attitudes, Practices KII Key Informant Interview LGBTQ+ Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer M&E Monitoring and evaluation MOFA Ministry of Foreign Affairs MOU Memorandum of Understanding NCD National Council on Disability NDP National Development Plan NEA National Expected Accomplishment NGO Non-Governmental Organization NHRAP National Human Rights Action Plan OHCHR Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights OMP Operational Management Plan PMS Performance Monitoring System PPMES Policy, Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation Service 4 Executive Summary Background Programme Background For over two decades, northern Uganda suffered prolonged conflict, and after having experienced several humanitarian, political, and environmental crises over the years, Uganda is now a country “in transition” to full economic, social, and political development. The country is a party to the main international and regional human rights instruments, has an enhanced decentralised governmental system, and has undertaken several constitutional reforms in order to enforce the separation of powers and to restore peace across the country. In the regional context, Uganda ranks in the middle of the Great Lakes region countries according to main socio-economic and civil and political indicators, with distinguishing features in terms of young population demographics (the lowest median age of the region) and continuing low mobile phone and internet penetration in the country. Pursuant to the goals of the Uganda Vision 2040, the country has adopted several strategies and plans including the Poverty Eradication Action Plans and the National Development Plan. Efforts made so far have had a significant positive effect in key areas of development, thus contributing to the overall modernisation of economic sectors of the country. However, despite major advances, there are still a number of important challenges in the areas of political rights, civil liberties, and economic, social and cultural rights, which require attention. In 2005, the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) established the Uganda Country Office (CO), pursuant to an invitation by the Ugandan Government. The initial mandate of the Office was to monitor the human rights situation in Northern Uganda and Karamoja. In 2009, the mandate of the OHCHR presence in Uganda (OHCHR-Uganda) was extended to cover the entire country. The Host Country Agreement was renewed again in 2011 and in 2014. In May 2017, the Government of Uganda and OHCHR signed a non-renewable Host Country Agreement for a period of two years (March 2017-March 2019). As part of this agreement, OHCHR committed to submitting an exit strategy to the Government of Uganda within six months, outlining activities to be completed by March 2019. Note: The field trip happened in November 2018 and the report captures the uncertain situation at the time. The OHCHR Country Office reported that the government had since indicated its readiness to accept a continued presence of OHCHR in Uganda. Since the establishment of its office in Uganda, the mandate and structure of the Office has greatly shifted from the initial conflict focus. OHCHR has contributed to improving the human rights situation in the country through a comprehensive strategy that includes: ● Monitoring human rights issues with a view to advising the authorities and other relevant actors on the formulation and implementation of policies, programmes and measures to promote and protect human rights; ● Providing technical cooperation to national authorities, the Uganda Human Rights Commission (UHRC), and civil society organizations (CSOs) with a view to strengthening respect for human rights; ● Promoting human rights to the general public and disseminating information on international human rights and humanitarian law standards. 2 Currently, OHCHR has a head office in the capital city, Kampala, and two sub-regional offices in northern Uganda, in Acholi sub-region (Gulu) and in Karamoja sub-region (Moroto). Evaluation Background The objectives of this evaluation were
Load more

Recommended publications
  • October 21 2017 Thesis New Changes Tracked
    The Status, Rights and Treatment of Persons with Disabilities within Customary Legal Frameworks in Uganda: A Study of Mukono District By David Brian Dennison BA (honours), MBA, JD (cum laude) (University of Georgia, USA) Thesis Presented for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Private TownLaw Faculty of Law UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN Cape of Date of submission: 31 October 2017 Supervisor: Professor Chuma Himonga University Department of Private Law University of Cape Town The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derivedTown from it is to be published without full acknowledgement of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes Capeonly. of Published by the University of Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University The copyright for this thesis rests with the University of Cape Town. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgment of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non-commercial research purposes only. "ii ABSTRACT Thesis Title: The Status, Rights and Treatment of Persons with Disabilities within Customary Legal Frameworks in Uganda: A Study of Mukono District Submitted by: David Brian Dennison on 31 October 2017 This thesis addresses the question: How do customary legal frameworks impact the status, rights and treatment of persons with disabilities? It is motivated by two underlying premises. First, customary legal frameworks are highly consequential in Sub-Saharan contexts.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Uganda's "No Party" System Discriminatory Against Women and a Violation of International Law? Amy N
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Brooklyn Law School: BrooklynWorks Brooklyn Journal of International Law Volume 27 Issue 3 SYMPOSIUM: Article 11 International Telecommunications Law in the Post- Deregulatory Landscape 2002 Is Uganda's "No Party" System Discriminatory Against Women and a Violation of International Law? Amy N. Lippincott Follow this and additional works at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/bjil Recommended Citation Amy N. Lippincott, Is Uganda's "No Party" System Discriminatory Against Women and a Violation of International Law?, 27 Brook. J. Int'l L. (2002). Available at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/bjil/vol27/iss3/11 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at BrooklynWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Brooklyn Journal of International Law by an authorized editor of BrooklynWorks. IS UGANDA'S "NO-PARTY" SYSTEM DISCRIMINATORY AGAINST WOMEN AND A VIOLATION OF INTERNATIONAL LAW? I. INTRODUCTION In the wake of colonialism, democratic governments have re- cently been established in many African countries. Under the watchful- eye of the international community, these couhtries have frequently taken steps to address widespread allegations of human rights abuses and discrimination, including estab- lishing and amending their constitutions and participating in various international conventions and treaties. While these documented efforts made by African nations to eliminate dis- crimination are commendable, it is crucial
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights Violations
    dysfunctional nature of the system they inherited and maintained. Ad- mittedly, theirs is a peculiar "au- tonomous"behaviour which contrib- utes to gross violations of rights and the socio-economic and political de- cay of the state. Another factor that sustains the culture of crises is ex- ternal to the country. Firstly, a HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS number of governments, democratic and authoritarian, in the South and North, have directly and indirectly supported dictatorial regimes in the country. Through economic, diplo- matic and military assistance the wheel ofviolence and dictatorship is serviced. Secondly, by treating the crises as essentially internal affairs In the past three decades since sequence off tends to change other of the sovereign state, the interna- Uganda gained independence from qualities of life so that from a number tional community has done little to Britain, the country has experienced of different starting points, follow- avert violations of rights. Finally, some of the worst human catastro- ing different trajectories of change, by maintaining the unjust and ex- phes in modern times -gross viola- comparable results may ensue. This ploitative international economic tions of human rights, amounting to view seems to hold true for all the system which violates the right to genocide and generating millions of questions posited. Nonetheless, on development, the international com- refugees and internally displaced the balance of the evidence, this munity directly violates the rights persons; state sponsored terrorism, paper contends that while the ori- of Ugandans. dictatorship, nepotism, corruption, gins of violations of rights in Uganda The point is, the economic under- ethnicity, civil wars, famine; total lie in a blend of factors, colonialism development of the country, which collapse of the economy; the disinte- and its lopsided socio-economic and is a result of both internal and ex- gration and demise of the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Chased Away and Left to Die
    Chased Away and Left to Die How a National Security Approach to Uganda’s National Digital ID Has Led to Wholesale Exclusion of Women and Older Persons ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Publication date: June 8, 2021 Cover photo taken by ISER. An elderly woman having her biometric and biographic details captured by Centenary Bank at a distribution point for the Senior Citizens’ Grant in Kayunga District. Consent was obtained to use this image in our report, advocacy, and associated communications material. Copyright © 2021 by the Center for Human Rights and Global Justice, Initiative for Social and Economic Rights, and Unwanted Witness. All rights reserved. Center for Human Rights and Global Justice New York University School of Law Wilf Hall, 139 MacDougal Street New York, New York 10012 United States of America This report does not necessarily reflect the views of NYU School of Law. Initiative for Social and Economic Rights Plot 60 Valley Drive, Ministers Village Ntinda – Kampala Post Box: 73646, Kampala, Uganda Unwanted Witness Plot 41, Gaddafi Road Opp Law Development Centre Clock Tower Post Box: 71314, Kampala, Uganda 2 Chased Away and Left to Die ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report is a joint publication by the Digital Welfare State and Human Rights Project at the Center for Human Rights and Global Justice (CHRGJ) based at NYU School of Law in New York City, United States of America, the Initiative for Social and Economic Rights (ISER) and Unwanted Witness (UW), both based in Kampala, Uganda. The report is based on joint research undertaken between November 2020 and May 2021. Work on the report was made possible thanks to support from Omidyar Network and the Open Society Foundations.
    [Show full text]
  • Margaret Sekaggya P.O
    MARGARET SEKAGGYA P.O. Box 3176, Kampala, Uganda. Tel. No: 256-414-348007/8/10/14 Residence Telephone No: 256-414-270160 Mobile No: 256-772-788821 Fax No: 256-414-255261 E-mail: [email protected] or [email protected] CURRICULUM VITAE Date of Birth: Kampala 23rd October 1949 Status: Married PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS 1990 University of Zambia, Lusaka. Master of Laws (LL.M) Degree. Subjects: Constitutional Law, Comparative Family Law, International Law and Jurisprudence. Dissertation in the area of Evidence entitled “The Law of Corroboration with Special reference to Zambia”. 1970-1973: Makerere University, Kampala. Bachelor of Laws (LLB.) Hons. Degree (Did 12 law courses) 1973-74: Law Development Centre, Makerere Post-Graduate Diploma in Legal Practice (Dip. L.P). 1975: All African Law Reports, Oxford U.K. Course in Law Reporting- prepared in producing law reports. 1977: High Court of Uganda, Kampala. Enrolled Advocate of the High Court of Uganda. 1997: Danish Centre for Human Rights, Human Rights Course – Trained in the International Instruments. 1998: The Commonwealth Secretariat, Kampala Uganda. Training in Human Rights 1 PROFESSIONAL SUMMARY A lawyer of longstanding who has worked with the Governments of Uganda, Zambia and also with the United Nations. Taught law in various institutions, worked in the Judiciary and finally appointed a Judge of the High Court of Uganda. Administrative experience acquired through setting up of the Uganda Human Rights Commission, which is one of the strongest Commissions in Africa and has a staff of 153 members. Represented the Commission at both local and International fora, including the annual representation at the United Nations Human Rights Sessions in Geneva.
    [Show full text]
  • Download/Speech%20Moreno.Pdf> Accessed September 10, 2013
    Kent Academic Repository Full text document (pdf) Citation for published version Ruhweza, Daniel Ronald (2016) Situating the Place for Traditional Justice Mechanisms in International Criminal Justice: A Critical Analysis of the implications of the Juba Peace Agreement on Reconciliation and Accountability. Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) thesis, University of Kent,. DOI Link to record in KAR http://kar.kent.ac.uk/56646/ Document Version UNSPECIFIED Copyright & reuse Content in the Kent Academic Repository is made available for research purposes. Unless otherwise stated all content is protected by copyright and in the absence of an open licence (eg Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher, author or other copyright holder. Versions of research The version in the Kent Academic Repository may differ from the final published version. Users are advised to check http://kar.kent.ac.uk for the status of the paper. Users should always cite the published version of record. Enquiries For any further enquiries regarding the licence status of this document, please contact: [email protected] If you believe this document infringes copyright then please contact the KAR admin team with the take-down information provided at http://kar.kent.ac.uk/contact.html Situating the Place for Traditional Justice Mechanisms in International Criminal Justice: A Critical Analysis of the implications of the Juba Peace Agreement on Reconciliation and Accountability By DANIEL RONALD RUHWEZA Supervised by Dr. Emily Haslam, Prof. Toni Williams & Prof. Wade Mansell A Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the Award of the Doctor of Philosophy in Law (International Criminal Law) at University of Kent at Canterbury April 2016 DECLARATION I declare that the thesis I have presented for examination for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the University of Kent at Canterbury is exclusively my own work other than where I have evidently specified that it is the work of other people.
    [Show full text]
  • The Resistance Councils in Uganda a Study of Rural
    Roskilde University The resistance councils in Uganda a study of rual politics and popular democracy in Africa Tidemand, Per Publication date: 2013 Citation for published version (APA): Tidemand, P. (2013). The resistance councils in Uganda: a study of rual politics and popular democracy in Africa. Roskilde Universitet. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain. • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 04. Oct. 2021 The Resistance Councils in Uganda A Study of Rural Politics and Popular Democracy in Africa Volume I: Main Text PhD Dissertation by Per Tidemand Roskilde University International Development Studies 1994 P.O. Box 260 Roskilde, Denmark www.ruc.dk Acknowledgements The research of which this report is a main product has for the better or worse filled the major part of my life the last three years. A huge number of persons and institutions have been involved who gave me academic, practical and personal assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Addressing Civic Space Restrictions in Uganda: What Role for the Universal Periodic Review?
    Addressing Civic Space Restrictions in Uganda: What Role for the Universal Periodic Review? February 2017 Edited by Andrew Firmin, Editor, Policy and Research, CIVICUS Written and researched by David Kode, Senior Policy and Research Officer, CIVICUS Lizet Vlamings, Senior Researcher, Foundation for Human Rights Initiative (FHRI) FHRI is a human rights advocacy organisation based in Kampala, Uganda Executive summary This policy action brief, prepared by CIVICUS, the global civil society alliance, and the Foundation for Human Rights Initiative (FHRI), examines a range of restrictions on civil society’s fundamental rights recently experienced in Uganda. In particular, these have included a series of break-ins on the premises of civil society organisations (CSOs), in which CSO information has been stolen; attacks on the media, which have included physical attacks on journalists and the closure of private radio stations; the introduction of restrictive legislation, including on CSO operations, the media and the freedom of assembly; and increased restriction of peaceful assemblies, including through the use of excessive force to break up protests. These restrictions occur most when CSOs and human rights defenders attempt to articulate independent viewpoints and expose government failures and malpractices. They have the effect of making it harder for civil society to play its proper roles and may cause CSOs and journalists to self-censor, something further encouraged by impunity over security force actions. Because of this, the restrictions
    [Show full text]
  • E Status, Rights and Treatment of Persons with Disabilities Within Customary Legal Frameworks in Uganda a Study of Mukono District
    9 Law African African Law 9 within Customarywithin Legal Frameworks in Uganda Disabilities with of Persons e Status, Rights and Treatment e Status, Rights and Treatment of Persons with Disabilities within Customary Legal Brian Dennison Frameworks in Uganda e Status, Rights and Little is known about the interaction of customary law and disability rights. is Treatment of Persons research based on a case study in Uganda o ers a window into how a customary legal frameworks can impact the status, rights and treatment of persons with with Disabilities within disabilities. Dr Dennison highlights the particular importance of cultural beliefs and attitudes about the capacity and functionality of persons with disabilities in informal legal settings. is is true in the Eastern African context of the Mukono Customary Legal District, in the Central Region of Uganda, but also more widely on the whole African continent. e work concludes by outlining practical change strategies for those Frameworks in Uganda seeking to improve the status, rights and treatment of persons with disabilities in settings where customary law plays an infl uential and e ectual role. A Study of Mukono District Brian Dennison serves as in-house legal counsel for the Brian Dennison Savannah-Chatham County Public School System (Georgia, USA) and is an Adjunct Professor with the Regent University Law School (Virginia Beach, Virginia USA). He is the former Acting Dean of the Uganda Christian University Faculty of Law where he served as a lecturer for seven years. He holds a PhD in Private Law from the University of Cape Town and Juris Doctorate from the University of Georgia (USA).
    [Show full text]
  • HOSTILE to DEMOCRACY the Movement System and Political Repression in Uganda
    HOSTILE TO DEMOCRACY The Movement System and Political Repression in Uganda Human Rights Watch New York $$$ Washington $$$ London $$$ Brussels Copyright 8 August 1999 by Human Rights Watch. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. ISBN 1-56432-239-4 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 99-65985 Cover design by Rafael Jiménez Addresses for Human Rights Watch 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th Floor, New York, NY 10118-3299 Tel: (212) 290-4700, Fax: (212) 736-1300, E-mail: [email protected] 1522 K Street, N.W., #910, Washington, DC 20005-1202 Tel: (202) 371-6592, Fax: (202) 371-0124, E-mail: [email protected] 33 Islington High Street, N1 9LH London, UK Tel: (171) 713-1995, Fax: (171) 713-1800, E-mail: [email protected] 15 Rue Van Campenhout, 1000 Brussels, Belgium Tel: (2) 732-2009, Fax: (2) 732-0471, E-mail:[email protected] Web Site Address: http://www.hrw.org Listserv address: To subscribe to the list, send an e-mail message to [email protected] with Asubscribe hrw-news@ in the body of the message (leave the subject line blank). Human Rights Watch is dedicated to protecting the human rights of people around the world. We stand with victims and activists to prevent discrimination, to uphold political freedom, to protect people from inhumane conduct in wartime, and to bring offenders to justice. We investigate and expose human rights violations and hold abusers accountable. We challenge governments and those who hold power to end abusive practices and respect international human rights law. We enlist the public and the international community to support the cause of human rights for all.
    [Show full text]
  • How Can We Survive Here?” WATCH the Impact of Mining on Human Rights in Karamoja, Uganda
    HUMAN RIGHTS “How Can We Survive Here?” WATCH The Impact of Mining on Human Rights in Karamoja, Uganda “How Can We Survive Here?” The Impact of Mining on Human Rights in Karamoja, Uganda Copyright © 2014 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-62313-0961 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch is dedicated to protecting the human rights of people around the world. We stand with victims and activists to prevent discrimination, to uphold political freedom, to protect people from inhumane conduct in wartime, and to bring offenders to justice. We investigate and expose human rights violations and hold abusers accountable. We challenge governments and those who hold power to end abusive practices and respect international human rights law. We enlist the public and the international community to support the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www. Human Rights Watch.org FEBRUARY 2014 978-1-62313-0961: “How Can We Survive Here?” The Impact of Mining on Human Rights in Karamoja, Uganda Summary and Recommendations ........................................................................................ 1 Methodology ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping the Freedom of Creative Expression in Uganda
    MAPPING THE FREEDOM OF CREATIVE EXPRESSION IN UGANDA A Report By Ellady Muyambi Executive Director, Historic Resources Conservation Initiatives (HRCI), Plot 398, Kalerwe- Gayaza Road, Ark Building, Block 5 (Next to Total Petrol Station) P.O Box 34407 Kampala, Uganda, Tel: +256-41-4-532676, Mob: +256-71-2-213888, Fax: +256-414-533384 E-mail: historicresources11gmail.com, [email protected] Skype: ellady.muyambi Submitted to The Arterial Network Union House, 2nd Floor, 25 Commercial Street, Cape Town, 8001 December, 2011 Mapping the Freedom of Creative Expression in Uganda By Ellady Muyambi TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents........................................................................................................................2 Glossary.......................................................................................................................................5 List of Figures.............................................................................................................................7 List of Tables...............................................................................................................................8 List of Acronyms and Abbreviations......................................................................................9 Acknowledgements..................................................................................................................13 Executive Summary.................................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]