Universidad Complutense De Madrid Análisis Historico Y

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Universidad Complutense De Madrid Análisis Historico Y UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID FACULTAD DE FILOLOGIA DEPARTAMENTO DE FILOLOGIA INGLESA t ANÁLISIS HISTORICO Y FILOLOGICO DE LOS INICIOS DE LA FISION NUCLEAR TEsis DOCTORAL NATIVIDAD CARPINTERO SANTAMARíA DIRIGIDA POR LA DRA. JOSEPHINE BREGAZZI MADRID 1992 2 Quiero dar las gracias a todos los científicos que me han dedicado a lo largo de estos alios su tiempo y su testimonio los cuales sin duda han servido para dar a este trabajo un gran rigor histórico. Vaya también mi gratitud a los miembros de la Sección de Ciencias Físicas de la Real Academia de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales que me otorgaron el premio de investigación Alfonso XIII de Historia de la Ciencia Aplicada, por mi labor de investigación directamente relacionada con esta tesis doctoral. Por último, y de forma especial, quiero dar las gracias a la Profesora Josephine Bregazzi, Profesora Titular de Lengua y Literatura Inglesa, mi directora, por su inestimable ayuda en la dirección de esta tesis y por haber puesto su confianza en mi a la hora de abordar un tema que no siempre ha resultado fácil de tratar. Esta tesis doctoral viene enmarcada en lo que es la historia de la ciencia, por un lado, y la filología comparada por otro. En el caso particular que nos ocupa, historia de la ciencia contemporánea americana e inglesa, teniendo que resaltar que para poder entenderla ha habido que hacer previamente el análisis de los acontecimientos científico-socio-políticos des arrollados en Estados Unidos y Europa durante las décadas de los años 30 y 40. El análisis de la misma se divide en tres pades, de las cuales las dos primeras son inseparables entre sí, pues para abordar el estudio filológico, se hace indispensable conocer su aspecto histórico. Este nos ha permitido emprender el análisis del lenguaje que surgió a raiz de esos acontecimientos socio-políticos. Prácticamente toda la bibliografía consultada, así como las conversaciones mantenidas con los precursores de la física moderna, se han realizado casi exclusivamente en inglés, lo que me ha pennitido establecer una relación profunda con esta lengua en sus dos importantes aspectos lingtiístico e histórico. INDICE Introducción . 1 Objeto de este trabajo y metodología 2 Documentación 4 Relación de científicos extranjeros entrevistados 5 Relación de científicos espafloles entrevistados 9 PRIMERA PARTE ANÁLISIS HISTÓRICO El descubrimiento de la fisión nuclear 11 Una panorámica histórica 11 El nacionalsocialismo y la emigración intelectual de los aflos 30 27 Kaiser Wilhelm Institut 37 El III Reich y su escepticismo en la investigación nuclear 49 Introducción 50 Desarrollo nuclear alemán 58 Fin de la investigación y detención de los científicos 79 Conclusiones 84 El desarrollo nuclear en el Reino Unido 92 Antecedentes 93 El Comité MAUD 102 Tube A]loys 115 La investigación nuclear en los Estados Unidos 120 Introducción 121 El papel de los científicos europeos en el establecimiento del proyecto nuclear americano 127 i El Comité Consultivo del Uranio 142 Centralización de los trabajos experimentales 147 El Comité de Política Militar: El Proyecto Manhattan 162 Integración de la misión británica en Los Alamos 179 Oak Ridge y Hanford 181 Oak Ridge 182 Hanford 185 Trinity 188 Hiroshima 191 Conclusiones 204 SEGUNDA PARTE ANÁLISIS FILOLÓGICO El lenguaje nuclear 206 Introducción 207 El lenguaje nuclear. Campos semánticos 216 El lenguaje de la física teórica 222 El lenguaje de la fisión nuclear 230 El lenguaje nuclear espaliol 237 Origen etimológico e histórico de los términos de la fisión nuclear 245 Análisis de los términos 246 Testimonio lingtiistico 288 Origen etimológico de los elementos transuránicos 292 Introducción 293 Análisis de los términos 302 Etimología de las panículas elementales 316 Introducción 317 Análisis de los términos 319 TERCERA PARTE TEsTIMONIO HISTÓRICO Edoardo Amaldi 354 Hans A. Bethe 360 Rudolph Peierls 367 Glenn T. Seaborg 373 Edward Teller 377 Carl F. von WeizsUcker .... 381 John Wheeler 399 CONCLUSIONES GENERALES 404 BIBLIOGRAFíA Bibliografía análisis histórico 411 Bibliografía análisis filológico 427 iii INTRODUCCION Entre los grandes acontecimientos científicos acaecidos en el siglo XX, los computadores, la exploración del espacio exteriory los avances en la biología molecular, el descubrimiento de la fisión nuclear va a ocupar uno de los capítulos más trascendentales y dramáticos de nuestra historia contemporánea y, en definitiva, de la historia de la humanidad desde sus orígenes. La fisión del uranio supone el nacimiento de la energía nuclear como una nueva fuente de energía. Pero sin embargo este descubrimiento tuvo unas características muy paniculares al desarrollarse en un momento histórico extremadamente delicado. El hallazgo tuvo lugar en Berlin en 1938 en medio de una Alemania en plena convulsión política y asimismo en los albores de la Segunda Quena Mundial. Esta situación de inseguridad y de crisis profunda generé a lo largo de toda la década de los aPios 30 una importante ola de emigración a los Estados Unidos, conocida como emigración intelectual al ser básicamente el exilio de cientos de científicos y profesores judíos, entre otros, que provocaron que Europa perdiera el liderazgo científico que había mantenido durante siglos y haciendo que la balanza de la ciencia se inclinase cualitativa y cuantitativamente a favor de los Estados Unidos, Esta situación de preguerra fué suficiente para que los Estados Unidos, Alemania y el Reino Unido intentaran desarrollar un explosivo nuclear que poder utilizar durante la contienda, Este es, precisamente, el tema principal de la primera parte del trabajo de investigación que aquí se presenta, es decir, el desarrollo histórico de la primera aplicación que se daría a la fisión del uranio y que culminé con los trágicos bombardeos de Hiroshima y Nagasaki. Esta tesis doctoral se divide en tres partes: Análisis histórico; análisis filológico y testimonio histórico. 1 En el análisis histórico se hace una exposición de los antecedentes científicos y del ambiente sociopolitico en el que el descubrimiento de la fisión se produce. A continuación se hace un análisis de lo que fué el proyecto nuclear alemán durante la guerra. Este capitulo se hace indispensable porque el temor a que el 1111 Reich desarrollara una bomba atómica fue el motivo fundamental que llevó a los científicos alemanes emigrados en el Reino Unido a llamar la atención de este gobierno para que investigara la posible fabricación de un arma nuclear. A continuación se exponen los desarrollos de esta investigación en el Reino Unido y, por último, en los Estados Unidos, hechos todos ellos ligados estrechamente a la historia contemporánea de estos dos paises y por extensión de la Europa Occidental. La segunda parte consiste en el análisis filológico de los términos más significativos dentro del campo de la ciencia nuclear, los cuales han sido divididos en tres partes: 1. Términos de la fisión nuclear 2. Términos correspondientes a los elementos transuránicos 3. Términos relativos a las partículas elementales. La tercera parte es el testimonio directo de siete de los más importantes científicos históricos en el dominio nuclear, dos de ellos premios Nobel de Ffsica y de Química I-Ians A. Bethe y Glenn T. Seaborg, respectivamente. El resto son Edoardo Amaldí (fallecido cl 5 de diciembre de 1989), Rudolph Peierls, Carl Friedrich von Weizs§cker, Edward Teller y John A. Wheeler. OBJETO DE ESTE TRABAJO Y METODOLOGíA Mi interés en elegir este tema para analizarlo, tanto desde su punto de vista histórico como filológico, parte principalmente de mi profesión como profesora de inglés científico-técnico en la E.T.S. de Ingenieros Industriales de la Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. También me ha animado a realizar este estudio la ausencia prácticamente 2 absoluta de estudios de filología científica comparada en el campo de la ciencia nuclear para lo cual se hace irremediable un análisis histórico de la misma y del cual asimismo prácticamente no existe nada hecho al respecto en nuestro país, exceptuando pocas traducciones de libros extranjeros y una sola obra original de carácter recopilatorio. La metodología aplicada ha consistido en cuanto al estudio de la parte histórica se refiere, por un lado, a un análisis comparativo de las distintas fuentes bibliograficas relacionadas con el tema y, por otro, a la aplicación al trabajo de una serie de entrevistas personales mantenidas a lo largo de estos años en los que he tenido ocasión de hablar con importantes científicos de este siglo que han configurado de su mano la física teórica. El análisis lingilístico que encaja en el campo de la filología comparada, lo he realizado estudiando el origen de los vocablos y su etimología. He consultado y registrado las fuentes en las que el término ha aparecido por primera vez, cuando este aspecto era relevante. De cada una de las citas a las que hago alusión, he reflejado a pie de página la nota con los datos completos de la fuente bibliográfica o documental correspondiente. Asimismo importante es la transcripción de las entrevistas que he realizado, entre otros varios, a los siete científicos cuyos testimonios aporto. Las transcripciones de las entrevistas las he dejado en inglés, siguiendo la lengua que utilicé con ellos, con excepción de la entrevista a Edoardo Amaldi, el cual contestó a todo en italiano, su transcripción, por ello, la he hecho directamente en castellano. 3 DOCUMENTACION Una buena parte de la documentación utilizada la he obtenido en los siguientes centros: EXTRANJEROS: * Newman Laboratory of Nuclear Studies. Universidad de Comelí (Ithaca - N. York - EUA). * Hoover Institution. Universidad de Stanford (EUA). * Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory. Universidad de Berkeley (EUA). * Bodleian Library de Oxford. (Reino Unido). * Watson Science Library de la Universidad de Londres (University College). (Reino Unido). * Donaldson Library (Main Library) de la Universidad de Londres (University College). (Reino Unido). * Instituto del Radio V. Jiopin de Leningrado. (CEI) * Instituto de Física Lebedev de Moscú. (CE!) * Instituto Unido de Investigaciones Nucleares de Dubna. (CE!). NACIONALES: * Biblioteca de Investigación Básica.
Recommended publications
  • The Prometheus Bomb: the Manhattan Project and Government in the Dark / Neil J
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln University of Nebraska Press -- Sample Books and University of Nebraska Press Chapters 2016 The rP ometheus Bomb Neil J. Sullivan Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/unpresssamples Sullivan, Neil J., "The rP ometheus Bomb" (2016). University of Nebraska Press -- Sample Books and Chapters. 348. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/unpresssamples/348 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Nebraska Press at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Nebraska Press -- Sample Books and Chapters by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Buy the Book Buy the Book The Manhattan Project and Government in the Dark NEIL J. SULLIVAN Potomac Books AN IMPRINT OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA PRESS Buy the Book © 2016 by Neil J. Sullivan All illustrations are from Wikimedia Commons. All rights reserved. Potomac Books is an imprint of the University of Nebraska Press. Manufactured in the United States of America. Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data Names: Sullivan, Neil J., 1948– author. Title: The Prometheus bomb: the Manhattan Project and government in the dark / Neil J. Sullivan. Description: Lincoln: Potomac Books, An imprint of the University of Nebraska Press, 2016. Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: lccn 2016020649 isbn 9781612348155 (cloth: alkaline paper) isbn 9781612348902 (epub) isbn 9781612348919 (mobi) isbn 9781612348926 (pdf) Subjects: lcsh: Manhattan Project (U.S.)— History. | Atomic bomb— United States— History. | Atomic bomb— Government policy— United States— History. | United States— Military policy. | Science and state— United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2013.Pdf
    ATOMIC HERITAGE FOUNDATION Preserving & Interpreting Manhattan Project History & Legacy preserving history ANNUAL REPORT 2013 WHY WE SHOULD PRESERVE THE MANHATTAN PROJECT “The factories and bombs that Manhattan Project scientists, engineers, and workers built were physical objects that depended for their operation on physics, chemistry, metallurgy, and other nat- ural sciences, but their social reality - their meaning, if you will - was human, social, political....We preserve what we value of the physical past because it specifically embodies our social past....When we lose parts of our physical past, we lose parts of our common social past as well.” “The new knowledge of nuclear energy has undoubtedly limited national sovereignty and scaled down the destructiveness of war. If that’s not a good enough reason to work for and contribute to the Manhattan Project’s historic preservation, what would be? It’s certainly good enough for me.” ~Richard Rhodes, “Why We Should Preserve the Manhattan Project,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, May/June 2006 Photographs clockwise from top: J. Robert Oppenheimer, General Leslie R. Groves pinning an award on Enrico Fermi, Leona Woods Marshall, the Alpha Racetrack at the Y-12 Plant, and the Bethe House on Bathtub Row. Front cover: A Bruggeman Ranch property. Back cover: Bronze statues by Susanne Vertel of J. Robert Oppenheimer and General Leslie Groves at Los Alamos. Table of Contents BOARD MEMBERS & ADVISORY COMMITTEE........3 Cindy Kelly, Dorothy and Clay Per- Letter from the President..........................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Junior Ranger Book Is for All Ages
    National Park Service Manhattan Project U.S. Department of the Interior National Historical Park NM, TN, WA Manhattan Project National Historical Park JUNIORat Hanford, RANGERWashington Turn the page to accept this mission Welcome friends! My name is Atom U235 Fission. I will be your guide as we explore the Hanford site of the Manhattan JR JR RANGER Manhattan a Project N Project National Historical Park G SITE, WA ER together. This project was So big it changed the world! How to earn points This junior ranger book is for all ages. You may find some activities harder than others. That’s okay. You choose what activities to complete by earning enough points for your age. 4 points —— ages 6-8 Points needed 6 points —— ages 9-11 to earn a badge 8 points —— ages 12-14 10 points —— ages 15 and older ACTIVITIES POINT VALUE YOUR POINTS Complete activities in 1 activity = the Junior Ranger Book. 1 pt Join a docent tour or 1 pt ranger program. Total: Watch a park film. 1 pt Download the park’s app. Learn about our other locations. 1 pt This QR code will take you to the free National Park Service app. Once you have the app, search for the Manhattan Project to explore the entire park including sites in New Mexico, Tennessee, and Washington. WHEN FINISHED: Return your book to the visitor center and be sworn in as an official junior ranger. PARENTS: Participate with your aspiring junior ranger to learn about this park as a family. NEED MORE TIME? Mail your book to Manhattan Project National Historical Park, 2000 Logston Blvd.
    [Show full text]
  • Chicago Pile-1 - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    Chicago Pile-1 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Article Talk Read Edit View history Chicago Pile-1 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Coordinates : 41°47′32″N 87°36′3″W Main page Contents Chicago Pile-1 (CP-1) was the world's first nuclear Site of the First Self Sustaining Nuclear Featured content reactor to achieve criticality. Its construction was part of Reaction Current events the Manhattan Project, the Allied effort to create atomic U.S. National Register of Historic Places Random article bombs during World War II. It was built by the U.S. National Historic Landmark Donate to Wikipedia Manhattan Project's Metallurgical Laboratory at the Wikipedia store Chicago Landmark University of Chicago , under the west viewing stands of Interaction the original Stagg Field . The first man-made self- Help sustaining nuclear chain reaction was initiated in CP-1 About Wikipedia on 2 December 1942, under the supervision of Enrico Community portal Recent changes Fermi, who described the apparatus as "a crude pile of [4] Contact page black bricks and wooden timbers". Tools The reactor was assembled in November 1942, by a team What links here that included Fermi, Leo Szilard , discoverer of the chain Related changes reaction, and Herbert L. Anderson, Walter Zinn, Martin Upload file D. Whitaker, and George Weil . It contained 45,000 Drawing of the reactor Special pages graphite blocks weighing 400 short tons (360 t) used as Permanent link a neutron moderator , and was fueled by 6 short tons Page information Wikidata item (5.4 t) of uranium metal and 50 short tons (45 t) of Cite this page uranium oxide.
    [Show full text]
  • Internet Links and Further Reading
    Internet Links Folkart, Burt A. “Leona Marshall Libby Dies; Sole Woman to Work on Fermi's 1st Nuclear Reactor.” Los Angeles Times, November 13, 1986. http://articles.latimes.com/1986-11-13/local/me-24930_1_nuclear-reactor Herzenberg, Caroline L. “Women Scientists of the Manhattan Project.” http://apcentral.collegeboard.com/apc/members/courses/teachers_corner/31784.ht ml Kotulak, Ronald. “25 Years Ago: Atom Age Dawns.” Chicago Tribune, November 26, 1967. http://archives.chicagotribune.com/1967/11/26/page/1/article/25-years-ago- atomage-dawns/index.html Melissa Block Interview with Cynthia Kelly. "National Park Would Memoralize Manhattan Project." All Things Considered (NPR)Newspaper Source Plus, December 16, 2014. http://www.npr.org/2014/12/16/371253668/national-park-would- memoralizemanhattan-project “National Historic Mechanical Engineering Landmark Hanford B-Reactor.” https://www.asme.org/getmedia/90b37c36-6806-4b74-9610- 19ad7371575f/14Hanford-B-Ractors.aspx “Dr. Leona Libby, 67, Worked on Atom Bomb.” the New York Times, November 12, 1986. http://www.nytimes.com/1986/11/12/obituaries/dr-leona- libby-67-worked-onatom-bomb.html Silent Footage of Hanford from the Time Period. Uploaded by Manuscript, Archives, and Special Collections, Washington State University. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WB_dgw53Xvg Strickland, Jeffrey. “The Women of Manhattan.” September 27, 2014. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/20140927133528-92256333-the-women- ofmanhattan “This Month in Physics History: November 10, 1986: Death of Leona Woods Marshall Libby.”
    [Show full text]
  • Recollections and Reconstructions
    @ ? Editor's Note: The Society's Nuclear Pioneer Citationfor 1977 goes not to an individual but to a distinguished group of individuals: those who took part in the epochal “ChicagoPile―experiment of Dec. 2, 1942, which produced thefirst successful atomicpile chain reaction. The 42 members ofthe Chicago Pilegroup are listed on page 591. One ofthose named, Harold M. Agnew, now Directorofthe Los Alamos Scient@flc Laboratory, is the Nuclear Pioneer Lecturerfor the 24th Annual Meeting. The guidingforce behind the Chicago Pile experiment was Enrico Fermi, recipient of the Nuclear Pioneer Citation of 1963. In the artick which follows, Laura Fermi recreates the excitement and mystery that surrounded the work ofher husband's research team in the early 1940s in Chicago. @. The FirstAtomic Pile: Recollections and Reconstructions by Laura Fermi @ . @ / - .-i@ ‘@:@ Enrico FermIat work, ca. 1942. As far as I can remember at the distance ofalmost 35 Perhaps not all husbands adhered as strictly as years, the first guests to arrive at our party on that Enrico to the rules of secrecy when talking to their beastly cold December night were the Zinns. Wally wives. He couldn't have been more tight-lipped. Once! and Jean. As they shook the snow off their coats, related some gossip to him: “Peoplesay that you stamping their feet on the floor, Wally turned to scientists at the Met Lab are seeking a cure for Enrico and said: “Congratulations!― I was surprised; cancer. .““Arewe?―he asked with his usual for Enrico had given me no hint that anything unusual imperturbable expression.
    [Show full text]
  • Max Planck Institute for the History of Science Werner Heisenberg And
    MAX-PLANCK-INSTITUT FÜR WISSENSCHAFTSGESCHICHTE Max Planck Institute for the History of Science PREPRINT 203 (2002) Horst Kant Werner Heisenberg and the German Uranium Project Otto Hahn and the Declarations of Mainau and Göttingen Werner Heisenberg and the German Uranium Project* Horst Kant Werner Heisenberg’s (1901-1976) involvement in the German Uranium Project is the most con- troversial aspect of his life. The controversial discussions on it go from whether Germany at all wanted to built an atomic weapon or only an energy supplying machine (the last only for civil purposes or also for military use for instance in submarines), whether the scientists wanted to support or to thwart such efforts, whether Heisenberg and the others did really understand the mechanisms of an atomic bomb or not, and so on. Examples for both extreme positions in this controversy represent the books by Thomas Powers Heisenberg’s War. The Secret History of the German Bomb,1 who builds up him to a resistance fighter, and by Paul L. Rose Heisenberg and the Nazi Atomic Bomb Project – A Study in German Culture,2 who characterizes him as a liar, fool and with respect to the bomb as a poor scientist; both books were published in the 1990s. In the first part of my paper I will sum up the main facts, known on the German Uranium Project, and in the second part I will discuss some aspects of the role of Heisenberg and other German scientists, involved in this project. Although there is already written a lot on the German Uranium Project – and the best overview up to now supplies Mark Walker with his book German National Socialism and the quest for nuclear power, which was published in * Paper presented on a conference in Moscow (November 13/14, 2001) at the Institute for the History of Science and Technology [àÌÒÚËÚÛÚ ËÒÚÓËË ÂÒÚÂÒÚ‚ÓÁ̇ÌËfl Ë ÚÂıÌËÍË ËÏ.
    [Show full text]
  • Heisenberg and the Nazi Atomic Bomb Project, 1939-1945: a Study in German Culture
    Heisenberg and the Nazi Atomic Bomb Project http://content.cdlib.org/xtf/view?docId=ft838nb56t&chunk.id=0&doc.v... Preferred Citation: Rose, Paul Lawrence. Heisenberg and the Nazi Atomic Bomb Project, 1939-1945: A Study in German Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press, c1998 1998. http://ark.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/ft838nb56t/ Heisenberg and the Nazi Atomic Bomb Project A Study in German Culture Paul Lawrence Rose UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS Berkeley · Los Angeles · Oxford © 1998 The Regents of the University of California In affectionate memory of Brian Dalton (1924–1996), Scholar, gentleman, leader, friend And in honor of my father's 80th birthday Preferred Citation: Rose, Paul Lawrence. Heisenberg and the Nazi Atomic Bomb Project, 1939-1945: A Study in German Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press, c1998 1998. http://ark.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/ft838nb56t/ In affectionate memory of Brian Dalton (1924–1996), Scholar, gentleman, leader, friend And in honor of my father's 80th birthday ― ix ― ACKNOWLEDGMENTS For hospitality during various phases of work on this book I am grateful to Aryeh Dvoretzky, Director of the Institute of Advanced Studies of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, whose invitation there allowed me to begin work on the book while on sabbatical leave from James Cook University of North Queensland, Australia, in 1983; and to those colleagues whose good offices made it possible for me to resume research on the subject while a visiting professor at York University and the University of Toronto, Canada, in 1990–92. Grants from the College of the Liberal Arts and the Institute for the Arts and Humanistic Studies of The Pennsylvania State University enabled me to complete the research and writing of the book.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: the PRINCIPAL UNCERTAINTY: U.S
    ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: THE PRINCIPAL UNCERTAINTY: U.S. ATOMIC INTELLIGENCE, 1942-1949 Vincent Jonathan Houghton, Doctor of Philosophy, 2013 Dissertation directed by: Professor Jon T. Sumida Department of History The subject of this dissertation is the U. S. atomic intelligence effort against both Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union in the period 1942-1949. Both of these intelligence efforts operated within the framework of an entirely new field of intelligence: scientific intelligence. Because of the atomic bomb, for the first time in history a nation’s scientific resources – the abilities of its scientists, the state of its research institutions and laboratories, its scientific educational system – became a key consideration in assessing a potential national security threat. Considering how successfully the United States conducted the atomic intelligence effort against the Germans in the Second World War, why was the United States Government unable to create an effective atomic intelligence apparatus to monitor Soviet scientific and nuclear capabilities? Put another way, why did the effort against the Soviet Union fail so badly, so completely, in all potential metrics – collection, analysis, and dissemination? In addition, did the general assessment of German and Soviet science lead to particular assumptions about their abilities to produce nuclear weapons? How did this assessment affect American presuppositions regarding the German and Soviet strategic threats? Despite extensive historical work on atomic intelligence, the current historiography has not adequately addressed these questions. THE PRINCIPAL UNCERTAINTY: U.S. ATOMIC INTELLIGENCE, 1942-1949 By Vincent Jonathan Houghton Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland, College Park, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2013 Advisory Committee: Professor Jon T.
    [Show full text]
  • BOMB: a Story of Scientists, Saboteurs and Spies (As Published in the Oak Ridger’S Historically Speaking Column on October 13, 2014)
    BOMB: A story of scientists, saboteurs and spies (As published in The Oak Ridger’s Historically Speaking column on October 13, 2014) As I was in the mountains watching the leaves change and could not attend the presentation by Steve Sheinkin at the American Museum of Science and Energy, I asked Carolyn Krause to write her impressions of the talk. I purchased the book and got to see enough of it before loaning it to Carolyn to be anxious to read it in its entirety. Thanks to Carolyn I now have an autographed copy! Gordon Fee, who was also at the talk, told me enough to make me want to look more deeply into George Koval, an American born (in Iowa) spy for Russia during World War II. He was indeed assigned to Oak Ridge as a Special Engineer Detachment soldier. He was also transferred to Dayton, OH, on July 27, 1945. On November 3, 2007, Koval received the posthumous title of Hero of the Russian Federation awarded by Russian President Vladimir Putin. The proclamation stated, "Mr Koval, who operated under the pseudonym Delmar, provided information that helped speed up considerably the time it took for the Soviet Union to develop an atomic bomb of its own". The secret Koval is credited with providing “Clyde,” his Russian handler, is about polonium, used as a neutron initiator for the atomic bombs. However, as Carolyn learned, Steve Sheinkin did not include Koval in his book. He had asked for the FBI file on Koval under the Freedom of Information Act, but was disappointed to find much of the most interesting parts crossed out.
    [Show full text]
  • Hitler's Uranium Club, the Secret Recordings at Farm Hall
    HITLER’S URANIUM CLUB DER FARMHALLER NOBELPREIS-SONG (Melodie: Studio of seiner Reis) Detained since more than half a year Ein jeder weiss, das Unglueck kam Sind Hahn und wir in Farm Hall hier. Infolge splitting von Uran, Und fragt man wer is Schuld daran Und fragt man, wer ist Schuld daran, So ist die Antwort: Otto Hahn. So ist die Antwort: Otto Hahn. The real reason nebenbei Die energy macht alles waermer. Ist weil we worked on nuclei. Only die Schweden werden aermer. Und fragt man, wer ist Schuld daran, Und fragt man, wer ist Schuld daran, So ist die Antwort: Otto Hahn. So ist die Antwort: Otto Hahn. Die nuclei waren fuer den Krieg Auf akademisches Geheiss Und fuer den allgemeinen Sieg. Kriegt Deutschland einen Nobel-Preis. Und fragt man, wer ist Schuld daran, Und fragt man, wer ist Schuld daran, So ist die Antwort: Otto Hahn. So ist die Antwort: Otto Hahn. Wie ist das moeglich, fragt man sich, In Oxford Street, da lebt ein Wesen, The story seems wunderlich. Die wird das heut’ mit Thraenen lesen. Und fragt man, wer ist Schuld daran Und fragt man, wer ist Schuld daran, So ist die Antwort: Otto Hahn. So ist die Antwort: Otto Hahn. Die Feldherrn, Staatschefs, Zeitungsknaben, Es fehlte damals nur ein atom, Ihn everyday im Munde haben. Haett er gesagt: I marry you madam. Und fragt man, wer ist Schuld daran, Und fragt man, wer ist Schuld daran, So ist die Antwort: Otto Hahn. So ist die Antwort: Otto Hahn. Even the sweethearts in the world(s) Dies ist nur unsre-erste Feier, Sie nennen sich jetzt: “Atom-girls.” Ich glaub die Sache wird noch teuer, Und fragt man, wer ist Schuld daran, Und fragt man, wer ist Schuld daran, So ist die Antwort: Otto Hahn.
    [Show full text]
  • Nazi Secret Weapons and the Cold War Allied Legend
    Nazi Secret Weapons and the Cold War Allied Legend http://myth.greyfalcon.us/sun.htm by Joseph P. Farrell GÖTTERDÄMMERUNG "A comprehensive February 1942 (German) Army Ordnance report on the German uranium enrichment program includes the statement that the critical mass of a nuclear weapon lay between 10 and 100 kilograms of either uranium 235 or element 94.... In fact the German estimate of critical mass of 10 to 100 kilograms was comparable to the contemporary Allied estimate of 2 to 100.... The German scientists working on uranium neither withheld their figure for critical mass because of moral scruples nor did they provide an inaccurate estimate as the result of gross scientific error." --Mark Walker, "Nazi Science: Myth, Truth, and the German Atomic Bomb" A Badly Written Finale "In southern Germany, meanwhile, the American Third and Seventh and the French First Armies had been driving steadily eastward into the so-called 'National Redoubt'.... The American Third Army drove on into Czechoslovakia and by May 6 had captured Pilsen and Karlsbad and was approaching Prague." --F. Lee Benns, "Europe Since 1914 In Its World Setting" (New York: F.S. Crofts and Co., 1946) On a night in October 1944, a German pilot and rocket expert by the same of Hans Zinsser was flying his Heinkel 111 twin-engine bomber in twilight over northern Germany, close to the Baltic coast in the province of Mecklenburg. He was flying at twilight to avoid the Allied fighter aircraft that at that time had all but undisputed mastery of the skies over Germany. Little did he know that what he saw that night would be locked in the vaults of the highest classification of the United States government for several decades after the war.
    [Show full text]