EDUCATION for SOCIALISTS ISSUED by Lhe NATIONAL EDUCATION Deat\RTMENT SOCIALIST WORKERS Fwrry 14 A-Tarles LANE NEW YORK, N.Y.10014

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

EDUCATION for SOCIALISTS ISSUED by Lhe NATIONAL EDUCATION Deat\RTMENT SOCIALIST WORKERS Fwrry 14 A-Tarles LANE NEW YORK, N.Y.10014 EDUCATION FOR SOCIALISTS ISSUED BY lHE NATIONAL EDUCATION DEAt\RTMENT SOCIALIST WORKERS FWrrY 14 a-tARLES LANE NEW YORK, N.Y.10014 TOWARDS A HISTORY· OF THE FOURTH INTERNATIONAL Part V:- .TENYEARcS: ,HISTORY 'AND-PRINCIPLES OF THE'LE,FTOPPOSITION By Max Shachtman April 1974 40( Introduction, by Joseph Hansen 3 Foreword, by Max Shachtman 5 ~ ..> , .. ;~t .~~ TenY'ears:History and~J"inci~es"oth~~J.eft Opposition, by Max Shachtnlah' . ' 6 The Left Opposition and the Communist Movement 6 The Fight for Party Democracy 7 The ~~s.()ps of.()ft9Qer '. )"\, jlY £/": 9 The Theory Of S(l,cialism 'W 0rie ~PUb~ 10 The BdtisliGeneral Strike of'1926: ~ 13 The Tragedy of the Chinese Revolution 15 Planned Economy: Industrialization and Collectivizati<>n of Agriculture 17 The Break~up'of,tb;e!JJlq.• ~~(Ween(he llight \Ving .' andtheCenter~ndtbe'w.lmchtng'6fjb.e .•.• "Third Period." 18 The Dangers of Thermidor and Bonapartism 21 The International Left Opposition 23 Introduction Nexf'fall the world Trotskyist movement will celebrate collaboratiOnism of s.uIUmit c();Df'flrences. Yet that was. the the fiftieth anniVersary of·the fol'matiunofthe Left Op­ case. .. And, Stalinist, ultraJeftism was expressed. not. onl)" position,the f8ietion in·the Russian CommunilJt party·, in, sec:tfiriaJ;l.policit~s; it,Wl,lsalso expressed in violent ac" that cam~ to the defense' of the' program of Leninism . tions, min.(jIriiyvioienct;!. to,\lSea current'expression.:rhe against the' 1hreat to it.emanaiingfrom the rising bu­ turn ,to PORJllar t'rqntism and "peaceful coexistence" came, r~aucracy in .the Soviet Union. TILe 'struggle under the after the victory. of Hitl~r,; becoming the "new line"l;I.t leadership of Leon Trotsky against therefrograde:forces' the sevtlnth.congress of<!AepommJJ,~iSt International., in. 1935. headed by Stalin"becameextendedthroughout the Third ;". " International, ,leading' in 1930· to formation of the 'lnter~' lfowever. thepoli~ of,~peaceful coexiste~~":Aid not national Lefl"Opposition. Thisinterriational faction:pre­ appear .JullbloWDi.·It goes-back to 1924,being rooted pared the way'for'1he .Fourth International,the World in 'Stalin's theory ..arid" practice ,ofbuildfug"socialism in Party of the SocialiSt Revolution,' whlch·wa:s.foundedin one counfry.~It:iseasyIn17.eadingTenY~r8--History 1938. and Principles of the<;Lejt•.Opposition to trace the lineage prepatat~onsforobserVing AS part c, of the the fiftieth of "peaceful coexistence." > anniversary, we have decided torepublish7:'en Years.;..,.· ThE!" date Shachtm8:ll placed: on his pamphleLwas .. Jan­ History aridPrinciples~fthe'Left OppoSition, a'pam­ uary1933.·His flireword,however, was dated; Novem~' phlet .published"' in. 1933, 'in 'celebratioll of the'tenth' anni;., , ber;iI933.,The delay'inrpublication was; probably;caused versary oUhe' Left Opposition/The author, Max Shaehk by.·the. extraoJ'dinaryliefforts the .Communist :League. of mah,wasafthattime one of themafuileaaeI-sof the Ame:r1ca" went,;toin the intervening period to arouse the Aniei"iC"ari Trotskyistniovement.. Commuhist InternatiOnal to'ilie;dangerHitlel' represented. In its day,. this pamphlet helped edllCate' ageneiafion The" small orgamz8:tion;..of American Trotskyists'concen­ of English-speaking revOIUti0Ila:ry'Matidsts..Today it'has trated ,all itsresource~ ondramatwingthroughevery p08­ been, virtu~lly :forgottilIi,· in part" ·because-efDie subsequent sible avenue the meaning ofthe Nazi sewure of power and politic'al evolu~on of, the author; Wti6·ended tip' iii the tb-ethreatthisrepreserited,particnlarly to the Soviet Union. dghtwing of .the Sdeial 'DemOCracy.·· Yet 'it, is still of The delay inputJlication left its. mark in. the·pamphlet.· value, providing m'partlcildara' elearpresentatioJi'of The foreword declares the bankruptcy of the Communist the 'key 'piogtllmJDatie ···lfJsues·di"VidingTrotsky1Smfrom IIiternationakand 'calls for building :"a new Communist . Stalinisni '" as' they stood fbrty· yeats(a:goartd astliey(stllt· International." The dOC\1menL itself· was written in·a:ccor­ starid inthemaiIi ., dance with <an analysIS :that pointed to a ditIerenteon­ clusion·--"againstforming' a .... new .' international and for It Is, hardly nel;e~sary"t~(.llt17ess'th'fa~ttIi~tthepam­ remaittlng a faction devotedtol!eforming' the· COmJDunist phlet is now Chiefly of his\qf~~tin~erest.\Vliat ,~sUJ'PJ'isin~ IDtemlitional. This w/iI.8the· pOsition> of the Trotskyist isp.O\'llweU it .still ,stands up. ,0( cQuJ'se soiIle'9fthee"ents . movement up until July 1933.- d~( With', ,now .. appe~rl'enlOU; and.~fl~i:.q~mes m~n 'Flte finmediate reasons for theehange in position in nqthin~.,to . the ..PJ',~~n,i·'geB.eJ'ap.on h~~~;~<~ell-kno\'V.Jl the.J~~,o.1; move~ent., 1983'wetepolitical. Thed'ebaCle in>Germany, where· the !btt¥:NonceweEe in·.i:hileft :and' in CoriuMmtst pennittedthe Nazis toeoUilno power tl},~.8e party. Fo/. !Vho. W,ou},<!.l,Qte ,:Qiwe infQrmapQn on. theBe 'pfus'~fanureofthe€dmmunist tQi>i~! '!V~s~gge!l(U1evolu~es()t Trotski':~,WflUni~ .P~Q;, withduta fight, par" ties"in other tounlrtea to recognize the' enormity of the de.. lilJ~e.d b,~,ijJ.e la~t ew Ye~rs byJ>athfln,der.IT~~s! ~lti~. ~~!I~: t . feat, or even that a defeat had occurred......ae· taken'as tain excellent. notes covering that period. 1saac DeutS~e*:~ pr06fof' a qualitatWe','Change for the worse In the de.. biography of Trotsky is also a good reference so-i!.ice:'· generation'of theCornmunist'Intetnatidnal.The Stalinist On the political and theoretical level the pamphlet bas btireaucracy had shOWn itselfto be incapahle oftesponding in certain aspects long been superseded. Itmay be worth- itla vigoroUs way to even suc:h'athreat as tb:e·Nazlc()n~ While t() iadi(:a~ these., . .. , qtieBt'olpower'inthelieart of Europe; 1 T,he m08tglaring,f',plN'hl,lps, .ill .the absenee. of anyr~ ereQce 'to "peflceful c~"'teg.e.e." The reasoiQ. Jor' .tQi.s'~ F170mthe vie1fpoint of Marxist tlileory... 1).owever, the siInple enougq. ,The'pamphlet'was written.w-hen the Stalin-. eD1piricai,evip,crn~~" daxnning . a~ it was, ,-as insUfficient. ist:m.ovement was, follOwing an ultralefteourse-- the"thmi .A deeper" analysIS' was'" called for. UP. to. this tiIne the period."as.it·· wa&·· eaDeth.in .the ,Stalinist.lexicon.•Co~ Stalinillt.cup-ent. )l~.dbeen Characteri$ed as'::~ureaucratic quently·thea\lthor .s~~e& Afir<! ag~st., StaIinilitultra~ centrism," a,,cQI).Cept .. ~~tconstitutes the "~~4i:9g .line in leftlsm.• · '. Sh.achtmaiQ. 'sporb.'a~~i of .~talinism..in h~.pam~hlet. As That Stalb$m. Went Ulfo\JgP. .s1.Jcl1 a period mayse~m ShaCh~iln.iex:pJ,aJ.n~ioiQ.eCi)fthe, main featur~s .0ftlleStaliIl­ hardlycredible;.,lQ those.who., ~ekiQ.own it only inasso­ ist~on+hQ;d.1:?~.it8,tendency to zigzagull,c:ier. tl},e pres- ciation.witll: "PQpularAr9~~.. a:ndthe flagrant,~ia~, . sur, oL~op,~ad~or)'; ~o/ces~,Tbus it h~din'ade'unprin~ cipleda.nd~~Y~BgerQ\lsconcessAonsto. the kula)ts in *He·died. November 4, 1912, at the age of sixty.;eighl For an the <Spyiet ,Unio.nand to. such bourgeoispolitic~Jforn!a­ account of his political evolution see "Max Sha<h.tman 1904" tions ,abr~d., a8 the KuOmj,ntallg. Yetit lia~ al~o .. r~~ponde:d 1972" by Milton Alvin in the December 1, 1972, issue of The (in its owri ~ay) to the pressure of the Left Opposition, Militant, and "Max Shachtman: A Political Portrait" by GeOrge taking over, for insta:nce, the Left Opposition's program Novack in the February, 1972, issue of the International Social­ of industrialization and economic planning in the Soviet istReview. Union. Why, then, had the "bureaucratic centrist" faction 3 •. "f-- _. ~oo-.~_.~.. ==__ ._. ._ ............~_ failed to respond to pressure from the left in face of the layer is determined by the economic patasi~m of~' obviously immense danger represented by Hitler's rise vast state bureaucracy. to power? Viewed from this angle, Stalin, as the chief representative The .underlying .theoretiC!al . problem was .ta1(en up .by of'thebure.ucratic.caste, stood,to the .right ·of the'faction Trotsky in an article dated'Febritary 1,i935, "TheWotk~ headed by Bukharfu.The bureaucratic. caste llwept over ers' State; 'ffiermiaor and Bon'apartish'1"'(see Writ1ng~ of all .the group.ings that dated from the pro1~tarian democ­ LtionTi'otsky [1984-35L pp.166-84).Trotskyheld'in this racy ,of. Lenin's time.) The proeess begun by the Soviet article that it was necessary to make an adjustrrlent in the Thermidor led to the 'liquidation of the October 1917 analogy that had been drawn~Y the Left Opposition be­ generation a.. a ,.'hole, culminating in the assassination, tween' the degeneration of the Russiari:r-evolution arid the of Ttotskym1940. .; degeneration of the French revolution. The Left Opposi­ Trotsky, dropped further use of. the terlJ1<'!bure~lUcratic tion had' held that the Soviet-Unionfaced the danger centriSm!', In ac;letterto. James P.. Cannon",d~t~d October of··"Therrnidor" but that Thennicklr had·not yet occurred. 10"1937,<hElsH1oted:in passing how dn~ppr,opri!l,te the, (This view standsatfheheattolShachtman's pamphlet) teli.nha(f:b~QQ)e: !',Some cOR1J:'adefj' continue· tQ. charac­ Trotsky saidtliat''Closeranalysis,showed'that the Soviet terize·StalbU~.\a8''bureaucratic centrism.' This cparacteri- . Thermidor "i8"not before us' but'already far behind." It zation is now totally out of date. On the international had occurred "approximately" in 1924-25. aren.-" Stalipislnis no longer centrism, ,1>ut"thectudest However, Trotsky pointed ou~ 'it was.necesStlryto refine form ,of! .opportu'nism and 'oelal patrio~m. See Spainl" the concept of the Soviet Thermidor.Whereas the Boyiet, SbJlchtma.Jlfailed'to grasp the.fullttl~ni~o£.Trotsky's Thermidorhadpreviously' beenfuought ,ofa8'a,counter-! newcoJJtr,ibution. The keydiffiell1~" i~ b4¥:ame clear later, revolution that'wouid' testorecapitalist ptopertyl'tiations, W~8).1~ ~l\~P.i~ toenteftaitJ, the,.cpl}~pt.of s~ch a highly what, had! actually occurred was the dispossession of the co.J;ltr~dl,ctQl'y,.,:Phenomenol} all the .hureaucratic caste.
Recommended publications
  • The New Popular Front in France
    THE NEW POPULAR FRONT IN FRANCE by George Ross The 1978 General Elections may well bring the French Left (and the Communist Party) to power in France. The Right Centre coalition which has ruled France for twenty years has repeatedly demonstrated its inability to deal with the present economic crisis-high inflation, unemployment, low growth-which it has played a major role in creating. As a result it has been rapidly losing support while simultaneously splitting into warring factions. The Union de la Gauche (Communists, Socialists and Left Radicals) has, meanwhile, become an electoral majority in the country (a fact demonstrated both in opinion polls and in the results of the March 1977 municipal elections). Its leaders, Fran~oisMitterrand and the PS (Parti Socialiste) and Georges Marchais of the PCF (Parti Communiste Francais) are now seen as genuine statesmen and as plausible Ministers of France, by a majority of Frenchmen. Its 'Common Programme for a Government of Left Union' is received as a credible platform for resolving the economic crisis and bringing needed change to French society. Rumour has it in Paris that high civil servants have already begun preparing for the arrival of new men in power. The stock exchange has begun to vibrate with fear-and with the beginnings of an investment strike against the Left (a strike which, because it has started so far in advance of the actual election date, has had the effect of undermining the existing regime even further). The Gaullist fraction of the ruling majority has already begun a barrage of anti-Left hysteria against the 'socialo- communist enemy' with its 'Marxist programme' to remove France from the 'camp of liberty'.
    [Show full text]
  • Spartacist No. 41-42 Winter 1987-88
    · , NUMBER 41-42 ENGLISH EDITION WINTER 1987-88 .ONE DOLLAR/75 PENCE ," \0, 70th Anniversary of Russian Revolution Return to the Road of Lenin and, Trotskyl PAGE 4 e___ __ _. ...,... • :~ Where Is Gorbachev's Russia Going? PAGE 20 TheP.oland,of LU)(,emburgvs.th'e PolalJdof Pilsudski ;... ~ ;- Me.moirs ofaRevoluti0l.1ary Je·wtsl1 Worker A Review .., .. PAGE 53 2 ---"---Ta bI e of Contents -'---"..........' ..::.....-- International Class-Struggle Defense , '. Soviet Play Explodes Stalin's Mo!?cow Trials Free Mordechai Vanunu! .................... 3 'Spectre of, Trotsky Hau'nts '- " , Gorbachev's' Russia ..... : .... : ........ : ..... 35 70th Anniversary of Russian Revolution Reprinted from Workers ,vanguard No, 430, Return'to the Road of 12 June 1987 ' lenin and Trotsky! ..... , ..................... 4 Leni~'s Testament, •.....• : ••••.•.. : ~ •••....•• : .1 •• 37' , Adapted from Workers Vanguard No, 440, The Last Wo~ds of, Adolf Joffe ................... 40 , 13 November 1987' 'j' .•. : Stalinist Reformers Look to the Right Opposition:, ' Advertisement: The Campaign to \ Bound Volumes of the Russian "Rehabilitate" Bukharin ...•.... ~ .... '..... ;. 41 , Bulletin of the'OpP-osition, 1929-1941 .... 19 , Excerpted from Workers Vanguard No. 220, 1 December 1978, with introduction by Spartacist 06'bRBneHMe: nonHoe M3AaHMe pyccKoro «EilOnneTeHR In Defense of Marshal Tukhachevsky ...,..45 , Onn03M4MM» 1929-1941 ................ .' .... ,". 19 Letter and reply reprinted from Workers Vanguard No'. 321, 14 January 1983' Where Is Gorbachev's Russia
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical Review of Slovo's “Has Socialism Failed?”
    South African Communist Party 1990 Crisis of Conscience in the SACP: A Critical Review of Slovo’s “Has Socialism Failed?” Written: by Z. Pallo Jordan. Lusaka, February 1990. Transcribed: by Dominic Tweedie. “Has Socialism Failed?” is the intriguing title Comrade Joe Slovo has given to a discussion pamphlet published under the imprint of ‘Umsebenzi’, the quarterly newspaper of the SACP. The reader is advised at the outset that these are Slovo’s individual views, and not those of the SACP. While this is helpful it introduces a note of uncertainty regarding the pamphlet’s authority. The pamphlet itself is divided into six parts, the first five being an examination of the experience of the ‘socialist countries’, and the last, a look at the SACP itself. Most refreshing is the candour and honesty with which many of the problems of ‘existing socialism’ are examined. Indeed, a few years ago no one in the SACP would have dared to cast such a critical light on the socialist countries. “Anti-Soviet,” “anti-Communist,” or “anti- Party” were the dismissive epithets reserved for those who did. We can but hope that the publication of this pamphlet spells the end of such practices. It is clear too that much of the heart-searching that persuaded Slovo to put pen to paper was occasioned by the harrowing events of the past twelve months, which culminated in the Romanian masses, in scenes reminiscent of the storming of the Winter Palace, storming the headquarters of the Communist Party of Roumania. It beggars the term “ironic” that scenarios many of us had imagined would be played out at the end of bourgeois rule in historical fact rang down the curtain on a ‘Communist’ dictatorship! We may expect that, just as in 1956 and 1968, there will flow from many pens the essays of disillusionment and despair written by ex- communists who have recently discovered the “sterling” qualities of late capitalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Egypt's Socialism and Marxist Thought
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Faculty Publications Political Science, Department of 4-1975 Egypt's Socialism and Marxist Thought: Some Preliminary Observations on Social Theory and Metaphysics Shahrough Akhavi University of South Carolina - Columbia, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/poli_facpub Part of the Political Science Commons Publication Info Published in Comparative Studies in Society and History, Volume 17, Issue 2, 1975, pages 190-211. http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=css © 1975 by Cambridge University Press This Article is brought to you by the Political Science, Department of at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Egypt'sSocialism and MarxistThought: Some PreliminaryObservations on SocialTheory and Metaphysics SHAHROUGH AKHAVI Universityof South Carolina I. THE PRIOR SIGNIFICANCE OF UNITY Since 1952 the elaboration of Egyptian ideology has constituted a source of conflict between the regime and the left/right opposition. In trying to capture the ideological center, the regime has inevitably drawn itself into the maelstrom of public contention characterized by mass conformity, intimidation, purges, arrests, show trials and incarceration of all who fundamentally question the principles of the leadership. Democratic cooperative socialism ('Arab socialism') is the official ideology, and a spate of books and articles have been published on its significance for Egyptian politics. Despite all these efforts, confusion still tends to reign over this concept, both among Egyptians themselves, and outsiders studying it. It is essential to build toward a definition of Arab socialism in its Egyptian variant.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Two Trotsky, the Left Opposition and the Rise of Stalinism: Theory and Practice
    Chapter Two Trotsky, the Left Opposition and the Rise of Stalinism: Theory and Practice Introduction This chapter proposes to re-evaluate the political character and historical significance of the Left Oppo- sition through a detailed assessment of Tony Cliff’s Trotsky, 1923–1927: Fighting the Rising Stalinist Bureau- cracy and Trotsky, 1927–1940: The Darker the Night the Brighter the Star, which are, respectively, the third and fourth volumes of his Trotsky biography. In the pages that follow, I argue that Trotsky and the Left Opposition did not oppose Stalin’s policies of forced industrialisation and collectivisation. Worse, they failed to support worker- and peasant-resistance to these policies. In fact, the political programme and worldview of the Left Opposition objectively con- tributed to the formation and consolidation ‘from above’ of a new class-society in the critical period of 1927–33. The visceral reaction of many Marxists and per- haps all Trotskyists to anyone brazen or foolish enough to declare the traditional understanding of the Left Opposition’s historical role incorrect might be to consider it absurd. And yet, none other than Cliff, in his comprehensive and probing study of Trotsky’s life and politics, recognised this cardinal fact: the overwhelming majority of the Left Oppo- sition’s leadership believed that ‘Stalin’s policies of collectivisation and speedy industrialisation were 88 • Chapter Two socialist policies, that there was no realistic alternative to them.’1 But if this was so – and it was so – how can this disturbing fact be reconciled with any notion that, at this critical juncture, Trotsky and the Left Opposition were ‘fighting the rising Stalinist bureaucracy’ and its policies? Cliff thought he could get around this contradiction by arguing that Trotsky kept up the fight while the Left Opposition ‘capitulated’ to Stalin.
    [Show full text]
  • 288381679.Pdf
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Loughborough University Institutional Repository This item was submitted to Loughborough University as a PhD thesis by the author and is made available in the Institutional Repository (https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/) under the following Creative Commons Licence conditions. For the full text of this licence, please go to: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ Towards a Libertarian Communism: A Conceptual History of the Intersections between Anarchisms and Marxisms By Saku Pinta Loughborough University Submitted to the Department of Politics, History and International Relations in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) Approximate word count: 102 000 1. CERTIFICATE OF ORIGINALITY This is to certify that I am responsible for the work submitted in this thesis, that the original work is my own except as specified in acknowledgments or in footnotes, and that neither the thesis nor the original work contained therein has been submitted to this or any other institution for a degree. ……………………………………………. ( Signed ) ……………………………………………. ( Date) 2 2. Thesis Access Form Copy No …………...……………………. Location ………………………………………………….……………...… Author …………...………………………………………………………………………………………………..……. Title …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. Status of access OPEN / RESTRICTED / CONFIDENTIAL Moratorium Period :…………………………………years, ending…………../…………20………………………. Conditions of access approved by (CAPITALS):…………………………………………………………………… Supervisor (Signature)………………………………………………...…………………………………... Department of ……………………………………………………………………...………………………………… Author's Declaration : I agree the following conditions: Open access work shall be made available (in the University and externally) and reproduced as necessary at the discretion of the University Librarian or Head of Department. It may also be digitised by the British Library and made freely available on the Internet to registered users of the EThOS service subject to the EThOS supply agreements.
    [Show full text]
  • Spanish Civil War 1936–9
    CHAPTER 2 Spanish Civil War 1936–9 The Spanish Civil War 1936–9 was a struggle between the forces of the political left and the political right in Spain. The forces of the left were a disparate group led by the socialist Republican government against whom a group of right-wing military rebels and their supporters launched a military uprising in July 1936. This developed into civil war which, like many civil conflicts, quickly acquired an international dimension that was to play a decisive role in the ultimate victory of the right. The victory of the right-wing forces led to the establishment of a military dictatorship in Spain under the leadership of General Franco, which would last until his death in 1975. The following key questions will be addressed in this chapter: + To what extent was the Spanish Civil War caused by long-term social divisions within Spanish society? + To what extent should the Republican governments between 1931 and 1936 be blamed for the failure to prevent civil war? + Why did civil war break out? + Why did the Republican government lose the Spanish Civil War? + To what extent was Spain fundamentally changed by the civil war? 1 The long-term causes of the Spanish Civil War Key question: To what extent was the Spanish Civil War caused by long-term social divisions within Spanish society? KEY TERM The Spanish Civil War began on 17 July 1936 when significant numbers of Spanish Morocco Refers military garrisons throughout Spain and Spanish Morocco, led by senior to the significant proportion of Morocco that was army officers, revolted against the left-wing Republican government.
    [Show full text]
  • Trotsky: Platform of the Joint Opposition
    Platform of the Joint Opposition-Contents Leon Trotsky Platform of the Joint Opposition 1927 The on-line publication of this important document was originally accomplished in 1998 for the Trotsky Internet Archive (TIA). The version, printed originally in an edition by Pathfinder Press, was ordered by Pathfinder Press attorneys to be removed. Pathfinder Press was once a Trotskyist publishing company but has for many years been operated within the norms of a commercial publishing house that jealously guards it's copyrights, even to the detriment of the distribution of the documents it seeks to control. This occurred in the fall of 2000. The TIA was able to obtain another translation of a 1973 translation of The Platform of the Joint Opposition from Index Books, a socialist publisher in Britain that was only too happy to have the TIA distribute, for free over the Internet, this document. Index Books acquired the stock and copyrights of New Park Publications, which for decades had been Britains biggest publishers of Leon Trotsky until it folded in 1984-85. —David Walters, Director, Trotsky Internet Archive This version was transcribed in the winter of 2000-2001 by David Walters Contents Forward — From New Park Publications and the Transcriber Chapter 1 Introductory remarks http://www.marxists.org/archive/trotsky/works/1927/opposition/index.htm (1 of 2) [06/06/2002 15:00:23] Platform of the Joint Opposition-Contents Chapter 2 The Situation of the Working Class and the Trade Unions Chapter 3 The Working Class and the Trade Unions Chapter 4 State industry and the building of Socialism Chapter 5 The Soviets Chapter 6 The National Question Chapter 7 The Party Chapter 8 The League of Communist Youth Chapter 9 Our international situation and the war danger Chapter 10 The Red Army and the Red Fleet Chapter 11 Real and pretended disagreements Chapter 12 Against opportunism-for the unity of the party The photos on the cover of the New Park Publications version of The Platform of the Joint Opposition shows the leadership and initial signatories of the Platform.
    [Show full text]
  • Egypt's Socialism and Marxist Thought
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Scholar Commons - Institutional Repository of the University of South Carolina University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Faculty Publications Political Science, Department of 4-1975 Egypt's Socialism and Marxist Thought: Some Preliminary Observations on Social Theory and Metaphysics Shahrough Akhavi University of South Carolina - Columbia, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/poli_facpub Part of the Political Science Commons Publication Info Published in Comparative Studies in Society and History, Volume 17, Issue 2, 1975, pages 190-211. http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=css © 1975 by Cambridge University Press This Article is brought to you by the Political Science, Department of at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Egypt'sSocialism and MarxistThought: Some PreliminaryObservations on SocialTheory and Metaphysics SHAHROUGH AKHAVI Universityof South Carolina I. THE PRIOR SIGNIFICANCE OF UNITY Since 1952 the elaboration of Egyptian ideology has constituted a source of conflict between the regime and the left/right opposition. In trying to capture the ideological center, the regime has inevitably drawn itself into the maelstrom of public contention characterized by mass conformity, intimidation, purges, arrests, show trials and incarceration of all who fundamentally question the principles of the leadership. Democratic cooperative socialism ('Arab socialism') is the official ideology, and a spate of books and articles have been published on its significance for Egyptian politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Albert Glotzer Papers
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf1t1n989d No online items Register of the Albert Glotzer papers Finding aid prepared by Dale Reed Hoover Institution Library and Archives © 2010 434 Galvez Mall Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305-6003 [email protected] URL: http://www.hoover.org/library-and-archives Register of the Albert Glotzer 91006 1 papers Title: Albert Glotzer papers Date (inclusive): 1919-1994 Collection Number: 91006 Contributing Institution: Hoover Institution Library and Archives Language of Material: English Physical Description: 67 manuscript boxes, 6 envelopes(27.7 Linear Feet) Abstract: Correspondence, writings, minutes, internal bulletins and other internal party documents, legal documents, and printed matter, relating to Leon Trotsky, the development of American Trotskyism from 1928 until the split in the Socialist Workers Party in 1940, the development of the Workers Party and its successor, the Independent Socialist League, from that time until its merger with the Socialist Party in 1958, Trotskyism abroad, the Dewey Commission hearings of 1937, legal efforts of the Independent Socialist League to secure its removal from the Attorney General's list of subversive organizations, and the political development of the Socialist Party and its successor, Social Democrats, U.S.A., after 1958. Creator: Glotzer, Albert, 1908-1999 Hoover Institution Library & Archives Access The collection is open for research; materials must be requested at least two business days in advance of intended use. Publication Rights For copyright status, please contact the Hoover Institution Library & Archives. Acquisition Information Acquired by the Hoover Institution Library & Archives in 1991. Preferred Citation [Identification of item], Albert Glotzer papers, [Box no., Folder no.
    [Show full text]
  • University Microfilms
    INFORMATION TO USERS This dissertation was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper le ft hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again — beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • Class Struggle in Any Depth
    https://theses.gla.ac.uk/ Theses Digitisation: https://www.gla.ac.uk/myglasgow/research/enlighten/theses/digitisation/ This is a digitised version of the original print thesis. Copyright and moral rights for this work are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This work cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Enlighten: Theses https://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW A Critical Contribution to an Understanding of the Nature of Soviet Society s j with Special Reference to Working Class Self-Assertion I I' © Neil C. Fernandez June 1995 Institute of Russian and East European Studies A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Social Sciences in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy ProQuest Number: 10391333 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10391333 Published by ProQuest LLO (2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author.
    [Show full text]