DOCSLIB.ORG

Master's Thesis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Master's Thesis Master’s Thesis - master Innovation Science Aquaponics Development in the Netherlands The Role of the Emerging Aquaponics Technology and the Transition towards Sustainable Agriculture Mascha Wiegand 6307345 Tulpenweg 17 63579 Freigericht Germany [email protected] +49 1607561911 Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Ellen H.M. Moors Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development [email protected] +31 30 253 7812 Second Reader: Dr. Koen Beumer Summary A sustainability transition in the agri-food regime is urgently required to interrupt the strong reciprocal effect between current food production standards and climate change (Willett et al., 2019). One sustainable innovation in the agri-food sector is aquaponics. Aquaponics is the combination of hydroponics and recirculating aquaculture in one controlled environment (Somerville, Cohen, Pantanella, Stankus & Lovatelli, 2014). At first sight, the water and nutrient-saving character of aquaponics, amongst other features (Somerville et al., 2014), sound promising for a transition towards sustainable agriculture. Therefore, the following research question emerged: How can the emerging aquaponics technology contribute to the sustainability transition in the Dutch agri- food sector based on Dutch aquaponics developments in the period 2008-2018? To answer this overarching research question, three sub-questions were developed. An integrated framework combining the multilevel perspective (MLP) and the technological innovation system (TIS) was used to understand the dynamics between overall structural trends, the current Dutch agri-food sector and the emerging aquaponics innovation. The innovation was also set into a broader European context. The research was of exploratory nature and used a qualitative content analysis to process 23 interviews, scientific articles, practitioner websites, publication, patent and Google Trend statistics, etc. By utilizing the integrated framework, an in-depth understanding of the emerging aquaponics innovation system and a context-view of the unique Dutch agri-food environment and the broader European perspective it aims to operate in, have been gained. This research showed that the aquaponics innovation system currently lacks the ability to contribute to the sustainability transitions in the Dutch agri-food sector. The main barriers identified in this research can be attributed to shortcomings of the aquaponics innovation system itself. Multiple drawbacks in all aspects of the emerging innovation system lead to the fact that aquaponics is currently not economically viable. As a result, the technology cannot compete with conventional agri-food practices which is amplified in the Dutch context of high efficiency and low food prices. While the research provides theoretical contribution to the field of agri-food sustainability transitions, aquaponics in particular, and the application of the integrated MPL-TIS framework, practical recommendations are also made to foster the development of aquaponics in the Netherlands and Europe. Entrepreneurial activities, knowledge development and knowledge diffusion through networks were identified as critical functions to the development of the technology. They will need to be fostered on a European and national level for aquaponics to gain market access and momentum. 2 Table of Contents Summary ....................................................................................................................................................... 2 Table of Abbreviations .................................................................................................................................. 6 List of Figures ................................................................................................................................................ 7 List of Tables ................................................................................................................................................. 8 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 9 2 Theory ...................................................................................................................................................... 13 2.1 Multilevel Perspective....................................................................................................................... 13 2.2 Technological Innovation System ..................................................................................................... 14 2.3 The Integrated Framework ............................................................................................................... 16 3 Methodology ............................................................................................................................................ 19 3.1 Research Design ................................................................................................................................ 19 3.2 Sampling Strategy ............................................................................................................................. 20 3.3 Data Collection .................................................................................................................................. 20 3.4 Operationalization ............................................................................................................................ 23 3.5 Data Analysis ..................................................................................................................................... 23 4 Results ...................................................................................................................................................... 25 4.1 Landscape Level ................................................................................................................................ 25 4.1.1 Environmental Pressures ........................................................................................................... 25 4.1.2 Socio-Political Pressures ............................................................................................................ 26 4.2 Regime Level ..................................................................................................................................... 27 4.2.1 General Agri-Food Regime Characteristics in the Netherlands ................................................. 27 4.2.1.1 The Agri-Food Regime from a Consumer Perspective ........................................................ 27 4.2.1.2 The Agri-Food Regime from a Supplier Perspective ........................................................... 28 4.2.2 Conventional Plant-Based Farming Regime ............................................................................... 31 4.2.2.1 Markets/User Preferences and Consumer Culture ............................................................. 31 4.2.2.2 Industry and Industry Culture ............................................................................................. 32 4.2.2.3 Science & Technology ......................................................................................................... 35 4.2.2.4 Policy ................................................................................................................................... 38 4.2.3 Conventional Fish Production Regime ....................................................................................... 38 4.2.3.1 Markets/User Preferences and Consumer Culture ............................................................. 38 4.2.3.2 Industry and Industry Culture ............................................................................................. 39 4.2.3.3 Science & Technology ......................................................................................................... 42 3 4.2.3.4 Policy ................................................................................................................................... 42 4.3 Niche Level ........................................................................................................................................ 44 4.3.1 Technological Innovation System .............................................................................................. 44 4.3.1.1 Entrepreneurial Activities ................................................................................................... 44 4.3.1.2 Knowledge Development .................................................................................................... 46 4.3.1.3 Knowledge Diffusion through Networks ............................................................................. 50 4.3.1.4 Guidance of Search ............................................................................................................. 53 4.3.1.5 Market Formation ............................................................................................................... 56 4.3.1.6 Resource Mobilization ........................................................................................................ 58 4.3.1.7 Creation of Legitimacy/Counteract Resistance to Change ................................................. 61 5 Analysis .................................................................................................................................................... 64 5.1 The Emerging Aquaponics Innovation in the Netherlands ..............................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Role of Animals in Eco-Functional Intensification of Organic Agriculture
    Sustainable Agriculture Research; Vol. 4, No. 3; 2015 ISSN 1927-050X E-ISSN 1927-0518 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education The Role of Animals in Eco-functional Intensification of Organic Agriculture Mette Vaarst1 1 Department of Animal Science, Aarhus University, Research Centre Foulum, P. O. Box 50, 8830 Tjele, Denmark Correspondence: Mette Vaarst, Department of Animal Science, Aarhus University, Research Centre Foulum, P. O. Box 50, 8830 Tjele, Denmark. Tel: 45-2290-1344. E-mail: [email protected] Received: February 22, 2015 Accepted: May 4, 2015 Online Published: June 20, 2015 doi:10.5539/sar.v4n3p103 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/sar.v4n3p103 Abstract Eco-functional intensification is understood as building synergies in multi-functional and resilient agricultural systems in harmony with their surrounding environment and human systems, to the benefit of diversified production of food and beyond, as in, for example, ecosystem services. Integration of animals into eco-functionally intensified agricultural systems to enhance agricultural, ecological and social systems, can contribute to driving a future sustainable development of organic agricultural and food systems. This approach may respond to challenges of an increasing industrialization of livestock in the global north, a process which has led to heavy reliance on external inputs, and, to a large extent, a detachment of animals from farming systems, especially in the global south. Animals are living sentient beings, but often not acknowledged as such. Complex, well-integrated systems can be organized so that they support the health and welfare of animals, and let these animals be valuable resources within the farming system.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Alternatives to Industrial Agriculture Brian Koch ENVR 395 Research Seminar Advisors: Derek Larson & Jean Lavigne
    The Global Food System: Sustainable Alternatives to Industrial Agriculture Brian Koch ENVR 395 Research Seminar Advisors: Derek Larson & Jean Lavigne Abstract Methods Results A functioning food system should produce food effectively and An evaluation of six agro-ecological farming techniques (organic, hydroponics, perennial, -The Green Revolution spurred the beginning of industrialized sustainably. The current global food system relies unsustainably on integrated pest management, aquaponics, and no till agriculture) provided a means to agriculture, an unsustainable system which utilizes chemicals, industrial agriculture. Alternative techniques could solve the issues of critique sustainable farming systems in comparison with industrial agriculture. A matrix monoculture, degrades the environment, human health, and promotes unsustainable production. Six agro-ecological farming methods were scaling system was constructed to compare each of the proposed techniques could large-scale farming evaluated through environmental, social, and economic lenses which improve or degrade within the specific criteria: environmental degradation, human health, specifically addressed environmental degradation, human health, and -Six agro-ecological agricultural techniques analyzed provide the educational and communal importance of small scale farming. and farm size. The status quo was the baseline at three for each criteria. Environmental environmental, social, and economic benefits degradation must be improved by signs of soil health, biodiversity, and drastic reductions These techniques would promote sustainability by improving soil health -Implementation of these techniques provides potential to increase and integrity and enhancing biodiversity within cropping systems, in chemical applications must be exhibited to score a four and a five or six if significant biodiverse crop production, improve soil integrity, increasing resource improving human health by producing various types of crops necessary signs are shown.
    [Show full text]
  • Organic Farming As a Development Strategy: Who Are Interested and Who Are Not?
    Vol. 3, No. 1 Journal of Sustainable Development Organic Farming as A Development Strategy: Who are Interested and Who are not? Mette Vaarst Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Aarhus P.O.Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark Tel: 45-22-901-344 E-mail: Mette.Vaarst[a]agrsci.dk Abstract Much evidence shows that implementation of organic farming (OF) increases productivity in the Global South, and that it will be possible to feed a growing world population with food produced in OF systems. OF is explored, analysed and discussed in relation to the principles of Ecology, Health, Care and Fairness as enunciated by IFOAM, as a developmental strategy. Major financial powers are involved in the agro-related industries. A number of civil society-based organisations point to the major negative side effects of the trade with and use of agro-chemical products environmentally and in the further deepening of the gaps between rich and poor. The MDGs target the environmental sustainability explicitly, and OF is regarded as being a relevant strategy to meet many goals. A global development strategy is needed that explicitly includes future generations, ecosystems, biodiversity and plant and animal species threatened by eradication. Keywords: Organic farming principles, Health, Care, Fairness, Ecology, Development strategy, Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), Food security 1. Introduction: Organic and agro-ecological agriculture can feed the world – if we want to Organic and agro-ecological farming methods are based on the key principles of Health, Ecology, Fairness and Care enunciated by IFOAM (IFOAM, 2005; see Table 1). These principles are implemented in various sets of standards, legislation and guidelines in different countries, and are valued by the consumers and citizens of those countries for different reasons, such as that they guarantee healthy food production, assure environmental protection and emphasise local resources and food systems.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Design a Pro-Poor Payment for Environmental Service
    How to design a pro-poor payments for environmental services (PES) mechanism in the forest frontier? Lessons from action-research in Madagascar A. Toillier* and G. Serpantié** *CIRAD, UMR Innovation **IRD, UMR GRED Keywords: PES, watershed, pro-poor, co-design, local knowledge, farm-level, smallholders, slash-and- burn agriculture, forest conservation, Madagascar. Abstract PES is considered new incentive tools for managing both the environment and rural development in developing countries. However, designing mechanisms tailored to smallholder characteristics and rural development requirements remains a challenge, particularly in tropical countries where the forest sector is characterized by long-standing patterns of inequality and poverty. In order to switch from theoretical principles to a really innovative management tool addressing local issues, we argue that it is necessary to include as from the beginning the characteristics of agricultural dynamics, and to involve local stakeholders in co-designing the ES and in solving problems encountered in their delivery. Through an action-research framework, we explored the characteristics of a “pro-poor” watershed-based PES mechanism associated with a hydropower project. The study site is located in the agricultural frontier of a rainforest in eastern Madagascar. We built a local and inclusive knowledge system based on (1) local and scientific knowledge on the relationships between land use and water services, (2) stakeholder perceptions on the electrification project, and (3) the heterogeneity of livelihoods of targeted households. We were then able to clarify what the environmental service and governance scheme could be. The main results show the necessity of going beyond economic and hydrologic rationales that usually underlie watershed-based PES development.
    [Show full text]
  • AGROECOLOGY: the Bold Future of Farming in Africa
    AGROECOLOGY The Bold Future of Farming in Africa ! Agroecology: The Bold Future of Farming in Africa • 1 “If anyone still entertained doubts as to the benefits of agroecology and as to whether it can meet the challenges of this century, this collection of essays provides a compelling answer.” Olivier De Schutter, Co-Chair of IPES-Food and Former UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food “There could not have been a more opportune time to publish Agroecology: The Bold Future of Farming in Africa.” Hans R Herren, World Food Prize (1995) and Right Livelihood (2013) Laureate. “It would be unscientific to ignore this evidence. The future of Africa’s agriculture lies in the hands and minds of Africa’s ecological farmers.” “The evidence and case studies Dr Vandana Shiva, Founder of in this report point to one Navdanya, Author of The Violence of the Green Revolution, Stolen inevitable conclusion: African Harvest, Who Really Feeds farmers hold the keys to the World. unlocking the potential of agroecological farming systems for improved nutrition, livelihoods, and biodiversity.” Jennifer Astone, Executive Director, Swift Foundation “Agroecology is the most important word no one knows: It represents a proven way of growing food that is best for people, the planet and the climate.” Anna Lappe, Small Planet Institute Cover Photo: Drought resistant pearl millet for resilience. Photo: Mwanzo Millinga Photo:2 • Agroecology: Kerry Farrelly The Bold Future of Farming in Africa AGROECOLOGY: The Bold Future of Farming in Africa With contributions from: Case studies from: Miguel Altieri TRAX, Ghana Mariann Bassey BERMA, Kenya Nnimmo Bassey Never Ending Food, Malawi Million Belay Send a Cow, Ethiopia Lim Li Ching Ruzivo Trust, Zimbabwe Steve Gliessman G BIACK, Kenya Bernard Y.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,380,766 B2 Limcaco (45) Date of Patent: Jul
    USOO9380766B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,380,766 B2 Limcaco (45) Date of Patent: Jul. 5, 2016 (54) AQUACULTURE SYSTEM 5,755,961 A 5/1998 Limcaco 6,117,313 A 9/2000 Goldman et al. 6, 158,386 A 12/2000 Limcaco (71) Applicant: Christopher A. Limcaco, Greenwood, 7,736,508 B2* 6/2010 Limcaco ................. CO2F 3/082 IN (US) 210,602 7,794,590 B2 * 9/2010 Yoshikawa ............. AOK 63/04 (72) Inventor: Christopher A. Limcaco, Greenwood, 119,260 IN (US) 8, 117,992 B2 2/2012 Parsons et al. 2009/01521.92 A1 6/2009 Michaels, II et al. (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this 2009/0230037 A1 9/2009 Ståhler et al. patent is extended or adjusted under 35 2011/0290189 A1 12/2011 Myers U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days. FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS (21) Appl. No.: 14/663,851 EP 2236 466 A1 6/2010 (22) Filed: Mar. 20, 2015 OTHER PUBLICATIONS (65) Prior Publication Data International Search Report and Written Opinion corresponding to US 2015/0264897 A1 Sep. 24, 2015 PCT/US2015/21698, mailed Jul. 2, 2015 (9 pages). Related U.S. Application Data * cited by examiner (60) Provisional application No. 61/968,432, filed on Mar. 21, 2014. Primary Examiner — Joshua Huson (74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm — Maginot, Moore & Beck, (51) Int. Cl. LLP AOIK 6.3/00 (2006.01) AOIK 6L/00 (2006.01) AOIK 63/04 (2006.01) (57) ABSTRACT (52) U.S. C. CPC ................. A0IK 61/00 (2013.01): A0IK 63/04 A recirculating aquaculture system is configured for growing (2013.01) aquatic animals.
    [Show full text]
  • Holistic Management Case Studies, Profiles and Articles
    Holistic Management Case Studies, Profiles and Articles For many years, large areas of grasslands around the world have been turning into barren deserts. This process, called desertification, is happening at an alarming rate and plays a critical role in many of the world’s most pressing problems, including climate change, drought, famine, poverty and social violence. One major cause of desertification is agriculture – or the production of food and fiber from the world’s land by human beings for human beings. In the past, large wild herds of grass-eating herbivores migrated and were pushed along by predators over the grasslands. These herds grazed, defecated, stomped and salivated as they moved around, building soil and deepening plant roots. Over time, the wild herds were largely replaced by small numbers of domestic, sedentary livestock and populations of predators were mostly destroyed. Without the constant activity of large numbers of cattle, the cycle of biological decay on the grasslands was interrupted and the once-rich soils turned into dry, exposed desert land. Over forty years ago, Allan Savory developed Holistic Management, an approach that helps land managers, farmers, ranchers, environmentalists, policymakers and others understand the relationship between large herds of wild herbivores and the grasslands and develop strategies for managing herds of domestic livestock to mimic those wild herds to heal the grasslands. Holistic Management is successful because it is a cost- effective, highly scalable, and a nature-based solution. It is sustainable because it increases land productivity, livestock stocking rates, and profits. Today, there are successful Holistic Management practitioners spread across the globe, from Canada to Patagonia and from Zimbabwe to Australia to Montana.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Ecological Agriculture Feed Nine Billion People? - Monthly Review 2/11/10 5:28 PM
    Can Ecological Agriculture Feed Nine Billion People? - Monthly Review 2/11/10 5:28 PM November 2009 Can Ecological Agriculture Feed Nine Billion People? Jules Pretty Home Something is wrong with our agricultural and food systems.1 Despite Subscribe great progress in increasing productivity in the last century, hundreds of millions of people remain hungry and malnourished. Further Notes from the Editors hundreds of millions eat too much, or consume the wrong sorts of food, and it is making them ill. The health of the environment suffers Jules Pretty is professor of too, as degradation of soil and water seems to accompany many of environment and society at the the agricultural systems we have developed in recent years. Can University of Essex, UK. nothing be done, or is it time for the expansion of an agriculture ESSAYS ON: founded more on ecological principles and in harmony with people, their societies, and cultures? » AFRICA » ASIA As we advance into the second decade of the twenty-first century, we » EMPIRE & THE NEW IMPERIALISM have some critical choices. Humans have been farming for some 600 » EUROPE generations, and for most of that time the production and consumption » FEMINISM/WOMEN of food has been intimately connected to cultural and social systems. » FOOD & HUNGER Yet, over the last two or three generations, we have developed hugely » GLOBALIZATION successful agricultural systems based largely on industrial principles. » IRAQ & U.S. IMPERIALISM These systems produce more food per hectare and per worker than » LABOR/WORKING-CLASS ever before, but only look efficient if the harmful side-effects — the use » LATIN AMERICA & CARIBBEAN of fossil fuels, the loss of soil health, the damage to biodiversity, the » MEDIA/COMMUNICATIONS pollution of water and air, the harm to human health caused by » THE WAR ON TERRORISM & THE agricultural pesticides on food and in the environment, and the NEW POLICE STATE development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in large-scale animal » U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquaponics: the Future of Ecological Farming
    Aquaponics: The Future of Ecological Farming Benjamin Oif What Is It? • The Combination of Aquaculture (raising fish) and Hydroponics (growing plants without soil) Aquaculture Hydroponics Problems • Aquaculture – Fish are crammed into small spaces. – Waste is produced quickly which can cause the fish to become sick – Frequent water changes and filtering must be performed ($$$$) • Hydroponics – Chemicals are used to grow the plants – Non-Organic Solution! • Aquaponics – Using fish waste as fertilizer for plants and using plants as a filter for the fish tank • Organic • Economical - no filter and no chemical fertilizers • Ecological - Reusing the waste produced by the fish and the water Proposal • Design and build two Aquaponics systems that can be used to perform various experiments – Experiment would test Ebb and Flow vs. Constantly Filled systems • 3 Phases – 1. Construction – 2. Setup – 3. Experiment The Design: Vertical Aquaponics Ebb and Flow Plant Bed Sometimes Submerged Always Submerged Constantly Filled (Constant) Plant Bed Always Submerged Construction • Building the Acrylic Plant Tanks… Construction Construction • Building the tables… Construction Construction The Setup • Longest phase of the project – From October to March • Many things went wrong – 1. Piping leaked – 2. Plants did not germinate properly – 3. ACRYLIC TANKS CRACKED • In several places Cascio brothers helping after the tank leaked The Setup Rockwool Hydroton Experiment • 8 Tilapia in each tank • Green Beans, Lettuce, Cucumbers, Basil, Celery, Parsley and Tomatoes • Hypothesis:
    [Show full text]
  • Agroecological Niches As Ecosystem-Based Adaptive Option to Environmental Change in the Forest-Savanna Transition Zone of Ghana
    Journal of Sustainable Development; Vol. 8, No. 9; 2015 ISSN 1913-9063 E-ISSN 1913-9071 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education Agroecological Niches as Ecosystem-Based Adaptive Option to Environmental Change in the Forest-Savanna Transition Zone of Ghana Benjamin D. Ofori1, Jesse S. Ayivor1, Opoku Pabi1 & Christopher Gordon1 1Institute for Environment and Sanitation Studies, University of Ghana, Ghana Correspondence: Benjamin D. Ofori, Institute for Environment and Sanitation Studies, University of Ghana. P. O. Box LG209 Legon, Accra, Ghana. Tel: 20-813-4292. E-mail: [email protected] Received: September 4, 2015 Accepted: September 16, 2015 Online Published: November 29, 2015 doi:10.5539/jsd.v8n9p281 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v8n9p281 Abstract Generally, local farmers are able to adapt to environmental change (and developments in socio-economic conditions) by engaging in a range of creative practices of on-farm management, use of improved crop varieties and adoption of new technologies. However in the past few decades, there has been growing interest in other adaptive options with the potential of addressing household food security and the multiple dimensions of sustainable agriculture. This study therefore examined the use of niche environments in the agricultural landscape as ecosystem-based adaptive strategy to environmental change among 102 farmers of 9 fringe communities of the Kogyae Strict Nature Reserve of the forest-savanna transition zone in Ghana. The study noted the increasing shift from maize cultivation to rice production using marshy areas and low-lying parts of farm fields and farms. The farmers mentioned climatic, ecological and other socio-economic reasons for this trend.
    [Show full text]
  • Innovation Towards the Sustainability of Mediterranean Blue Economy New Technologies for Marine Aquaculture
    Innovation towards the sustainability of Mediterranean blue economy New Technologies for Marine Aquaculture Associate Professor Rigers BAKIU Agricultural University of Tirana (Tirana, AL) Albanian Center for Environmental Protection and Sustainable Development (Tirana, AL) • 03: Fishing and Aquaculture (p.104) 03.1: Fishing • 03.11 - Marine fishing • 03.12 - Freshwater fishing 03.2: Aquaculture (p.105) • 03.21 - Marine aquaculture • 03.22 - Freshwater aquaculture Mediterranean Basin • Mediterranean basin is characterized by oligo or ultra-oligo trophic waters with a high environmental variability and steep physical-chemical gradients within a relatively restricted region: salinity, temperature, alkalinity and stratification all tend to increase eastwards (Lacoue-Labarthe et al. 2015). Overall eight species contributed 90 per cent of • The term ‘a miniature ocean’ was coined to describe the Mediterranean Sea (Béthoux et al. 1999) and this Aquaculture has been extended to compare the production: Mediterranean to a giant mesocosm of the world’s oceans (Lejeusne et al. 2010). the European seabass, The Mediterranean basin is an area where different environmental, gilthead seabream, geomorphological, hydrogeological and climate regions meet and allow different trout, aquaculture systems and technologies to develop and succeed. common carp, tilapia, mussels, oysters and Manila clams. Mediterranean Basin • Aquaculture production of marine finfish was dominated by two main species, the European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) with 161 058 mt, and gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) representing with 134 712 mt, in some countries also cultivated in brackish water. • In fact, until 1985, the production of the two main marine species was carried out mainly in land-based systems, such as ponds, and production from floating cages was limited to only 27 mt produced at artisanal level in inshore conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Seaweed Is the Common Denominator in Exciting Saltwater Aquaponics
    Issue # 36 Aquaponics Journal www.aquaponicsjournal.com 1st Quarter, 2005 SeaweedSeaweed isis thethe commoncommon denominatordenominator inin excitingexciting saltwatersaltwater By aquaponicsaquaponics Geoff Wilson A small but influential number of Australians 12 have been enthused by the common denominator of seaweed in saltwater aquaponics now moving Queensland to speak with fellow scientists. more clearly into view as a significant land-based technology. It also included an industry-based, five-hour “luncheon seminar” on November 2, at Bribie It promises to set in motion some interesting Island Aquaculture Research Centre (BIARC) just saltwater aquaponics research and development in north of the city of Brisbane in Queensland. Australia, which could enlarge upon the brilliant pioneering of saltwater aquaponics (also named The aquaponics study group of the Aquaculture integrated mariculture) in Israel. Association of Queensland (AAQ) organised the event in the interest of showing its members (some The catalyst in this thinking has been a visit to 150 fresh water fish farmers) the potential of land- Australia by an Israeli aquaculture scientist, Dr. based aquaponics in which seaweed is used to Amir Neori. He is one of the world’s leading harvest the wastes of fin fish. advocates of edible seaweed culture in association with the raising of fin fish and invertebrates such The five-hour seminar was mostly financed by the as shrimp, abalone and other edible species. Queensland Department of Primary Industries, which funded the visit to Queensland by Dr. Neori Dr. Neori is a senior scientist at the National after he presented a paper at the ‘Australasian Centre for Mariculture at Eilat, in Israel (see a Aquaculture 2004: Profiting from Sustainability’ report on his saltwater aquaponics work in st conference that attracted 1,350 participants in “Aquaponics Journal,” 1 Quarter 2003).
    [Show full text]