DOCSLIB.ORG

Managing Airports

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Managing Airports Managing Airports Managing Airports presents a comprehensive and cutting-edge insight into today’s international airport industry. Approaching management topics from a strategic and commercial perspective, rather than from an operational and technical one, the book provides an innovative insight into the processes behind running a successful airport. This fifth edition has been fully revised and updated to reflect the many important developments in the management of airports. It features: • New content on: evolving airline models and implications for airports, self- connection, digital marketing, sensor and beacon technology, policy decisions and economic benefits, and climate change adaptation. • Updated and expanded content on: airport privatisation, economic regulation, technology within the terminal, non-aeronautical innovations, service quality and the passenger experience. • New and updated international case studies to show recent issues and theory in practice, including studies from emerging economies such as China, India and Brazil. Accessible and up-to-date, Managing Airports is ideal for students, lecturers and researchers of transport and tourism, and practitioners within the air transport industry. Anne Graham is Professor of Air Transport and Tourism Management at the University of Westminster in London, UK. One of her key areas of expertise and knowledge is airport management, economics and regulation, and she has over 30 years’ experience of lecturing, research and consultancy on these topics. She has published widely with recent books including The Routledge Companion to Air Transport Management, Airport Finance and Investment in the Global Economy, Aviation Economics and Airport Marketing. Between 2013 and 2015 Anne was Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Air Transport Management and is on the Editorial Board of a number of other journals. Managing Airports An international perspective Fifth edition Anne Graham Fifth edition published 2018 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon, OX14 4RN and by Routledge 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business © 2018 Anne Graham The right of Anne Graham to be identified as author of this work has been asserted by her in accordance with sections 77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. Trademark notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe. First edition published by Elsevier 2001 Fourth edition published by Routledge 2014 British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Graham, Anne, 1958– author. Title: Managing airports : an international perspective / Anne Graham. Description: 5th edition. | Abingdon, Oxon ; New York : Routledge, 2018. | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2017051614 (print) | LCCN 2017051781 (ebook) | ISBN 9781315269047 (Master ebook) | ISBN 9781351977869 (Web PDF) | ISBN 9781351977845 ( Mobipocket) | ISBN 9781138285354 (hbk : alk. paper) | ISBN 9781138285347 (pbk : alk. paper) | ISBN 9781315269047 (ebk) Subjects: LCSH: Airports—Management. Classification: LCC TL725.3.M2 (ebook) | LCC TL725.3.M2 G73 2018 (print) | DDC 387.7/36068—dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2017051614 ISBN: 978-1-138-28535-4 (hbk) ISBN: 978-1-138-28534-7 (pbk) ISBN: 978-1-315-26904-7 (ebk) Typeset in ITC Stone Serif by Apex CoVantage, LLC Visit the eResource: https://www.routledge.com/9781138285347 Contents List of figures vii List of tables ix List of case studies xiii Preface xv Acknowledgements xvii Abbreviations xix 1 Introduction 1 2 The structure of the airport industry 9 3 Airport economics and performance benchmarking 83 4 The airport–airline relationship 125 5 Airport operations 177 6 Airport service quality and the passenger experience 219 7 Provision of commercial facilities 253 8 Airport competition and the role of marketing 289 9 The economic and social impact of airports 349 10 The environmental impact of airports 379 11 Future prospects 411 Index 421 v Figures 1.1 Airport passengers by world region, 2016 2 1.2 Airport cargo tonnes by world region, 2016 2 1.3 The world’s 20 largest airports by total passengers, 2016 3 1.4 The world’s 20 largest airports by cargo tonnes, 2016 3 1.5 The world’s 20 largest airports by aircraft movements, 2016 4 1.6 Airport passenger growth by main region, 2006–16 5 2.1 Passengers at major French airports, 2015 39 2.2 EBITDA share of Fraport’s business segments (%) 62 2.3 Percentage of airports with some private sector involvement by region, 2016 66 2.4 Percentage of passengers at airports with some private sector involvement by region, 2016 67 2.5 Percentage of airports by privatisation model, 2016 67 2.6 Percentage of passengers at airports by privatisation model, 2016 68 3.1 Operating margin of world airlines (top 150) and airports (top 50/100 depending on year) 1998–2015 87 3.2 Revenue structures at ACI airports, 2015 (excluding non-operating items) 89 3.3 Operating cost structures at ACI airports, 2015 90 3.4 Total costs per passenger for selected world airports, 2015 109 3.5 Residual variable factor productivity at selected Asia-Pacific airports, 2015 113 4.1 Aeronautical charges by source at ACI airports, 2015 131 4.2 Airport charges index, 2016 132 4.3 Importance of different charges with the airport charges index, 2016 (%) 132 4.4 Ground handling stations by major companies, 2015/16 162 4.5 US airport capital funding for committed projects, 2013–17 169 5.1 Passenger use of technology at airports, 2016 (%) 210 6.1 Passengers feeling positive or negative emotions during the airport journey (%) 239 7.1 Non-aeronautical revenue per passenger at ACI airports by world region, 2015 260 7.2 Non-aeronautical revenue at ACI airports by revenue source, 2015 261 7.3 Concession and car parking revenue at London Heathrow, Gatwick and Stansted airports (%), 2016 269 7.4 Dwell time (minutes) by journey stage, 2015 271 7.5 Penetration rate (%) by commercial category, 2015 275 vii FIGURES 7.6 Non-aeronautical revenue per passenger at Copenhagen, Geneva, Vienna and Zurich, 2005–16 279 8.1 Reasons for passenger airport choice at UK airports, 2011 311 8.2 Use of different types of airport names 317 8.3 Airport use or planned (in the next three years) passenger mobile services, 2017 (%) 337 9.1 The economic impact of airports 351 9.2 Direct jobs at airports, 2013 353 9.3 SEO air connectivity index of top 10 European airports, 2017 363 9.4 Services funded by the UK route development funds 370 9.5 Passenger use of alternative airports to Amsterdam after the introduction of the passenger tax 373 10.1 Surface access mode used at German airports, 2014 396 10.2 Public transport use and targets at selected Norwegian airports 397 10.3 Public transport use at selected UK airports, 2016 400 11.1 Airport passenger growth forecasts by region, 2015–40 416 11.2 Airport passenger forecasts by region, 2040 416 viii Tables 2.1 Examples of airport privatisation through share flotations 19 2.2 Examples of airport privatisation through trade sales 21 2.3 Examples of airport privatisation through concession agreements 26 2.4 Examples of airport privatisation through project finance/BOT 29 2.5 Ownership patterns at main UK airports, 2017 35 2.6 Group/fund ownership at main UK airports, 2017 37 2.7 Airport participation in the US Airport Privatization Pilot Program 43 2.8 Lease rent payments at major Canadian airports, 2016 45 2.9 Total airport traffic at Indian airports, 2002–16 46 2.10 Major privatisation projects at Indian airports 47 2.11 Major privatisation projects at Brazil airports 50 2.12 China’s listed airports 56 2.13 Fraport’s international activities 61 2.14 TAV Airports: portfolio of airports 63 2.15 Vinci Airports: portfolio of airports 65 2.16 NAA’s Sister Airport Agreements 77 3.1 Profitability for 50 major airport operators, 2015 83 3.2 Airport operating revenue sources 88 3.3 Average airport operating revenue and cost structures 91 3.4 Operating revenue and cost structures at a selection of European airports, 2016 93 3.5 Operating revenue and cost structures at a selection of US and Canadian airports, 2016 94 3.6 Operating revenue and cost structures at a selection of other airports, 2016 95 3.7 Performance indicators commonly used to assess economic performance 106 3.8 Performance indicators suggested by ICAO and ACI 107 3.9 Examples of airport performance and efficiency studies: parametric (stochastic) cost/production function methods 111 3.10 Examples of airport performance and efficiency studies: non-parametric index number methods 112 3.11 Examples of airport performance and efficiency studies: non-parametric frontier methods 114 ix TABLES 4.1 Main aeronautical charges at airports 130 4.2 Main features of the 2009 EU airport charges directive 139 4.3 Examples of economic regulation at selected European airports 145 4.4 The X value used for the UK airport price caps 151 4.5 A comparison of the main features of the new and old UK regulatory systems
Load more

Recommended publications
  • AOA-Summer-2015.Pdf
    THE AIRPORT OPERATORTHE OFFICIAL MAGAZINE OF THE AIRPORT OPERATORS ASSOCIATION DELIVERING A BETTER AIRPORT London Luton Features DELIVERING A A LEAP OF FAITH BETTER LUTON Charlotte Osborn, Chaplain, Chief Executive, Nick Barton Newcastle International SECURITY STANDARDS SMALLER AIRPORTS THE WAY AHEAD The House of Commons Transport Peter Drissell, Director of Select Committee reports SUMMER 2015 Aviation Security, CAA ED ANDERSON Introduction to the Airport Operator THE AIRPORT the proposal that APD be devolved in MARTIJN KOUDIJS PETE COLLINS PETE BARNFIELD MARK GILBERT Scotland. The Scottish Government AIRPORT NEEDS ENGINEERING SYSTEM DESIGN BAGGAGE IT OPERATOR THE OFFICIAL MAGAZINE OF THE AIRPORT OPERATORS ASSOCIATION has made it clear that it will seek GARY MCWILLIAM ALEC GILBERT COLIN MARNANE SERVICE DELIVERY CUSTOMER SOLUTIONS INSTALLATION to halve the APD rate in Scotland. AIRPORT OPERATORS ASSOCIATION Whilst we welcome reductions in the current eye watering levels of APD, Ed Anderson we absolutely insist on a reduction Chairman anywhere in the UK being matched by Darren Caplan the same reduction everywhere else. Chief Executive We will also be campaigning for the Tim Alderslade Government to incentivise the take up Public Affairs & PR Director of sustainable aviation fuels, which is Roger Koukkoullis an I welcome readers to this, an initiative being promoted by the Operations, Safety & Events Director the second of the new look Sustainable Aviation coalition. This Airport Operator magazine. I has the potential to contribute £480 Peter O’Broin C hope you approve of the new format. million to the UK economy by 2030. Policy Manager Sally Grimes Since the last edition we have of We will also be urging real reductions Events & Member Relations Executive course had a General Election.
    [Show full text]
  • London Southend Airport (LSA) Proposal to Re-Establish Controlled Airspace in the Vicinity of LSA
    London Southend Airport (LSA) Proposal to Re-establish Controlled Airspace in The Vicinity Of LSA Airspace Change Proposal Management in Confidence London Southend Airport (LSA) Proposal to Re-establish Controlled Airspace in The Vicinity Of LSA Document information London Southend Airport (LSA) Proposal to Re-establish Document title Controlled Airspace in The Vicinity Of LSA Authors LSA Airspace Development Team and Cyrrus Ltd London Southend Airport Southend Airport Company Ltd Southend Airport Produced by Southend on Sea Essex SS2 6YF Produced for London Southend Airport X London Southend Airport T: X Contact F: X E: X Version Issue 1.0 Copy Number 1 of 3 Date of release 29 May 2014 Document reference CL-4835-ACP-136 Issue 1.0 Change History Record Change Issue Date Details Reference Draft A Initial draft for comment Draft B Initial comments incorporated – Further reviews Draft C 23 May 2014 Airspace Development Team final comments Final 27 May 2014 Final Review Draft D Issue 1.0 29 May 2014 Initial Issue CL-4835-ACP-136 Issue 1.0 London Southend Airport 1 of 165 Management in Confidence London Southend Airport (LSA) Proposal to Re-establish Controlled Airspace in The Vicinity Of LSA Controlled Copy Distribution Copy Number Ownership 1. UK Civil Aviation Authority – Safety and Airspace Regulation Group 2. London Southend Airport 3. Cyrrus Ltd Document Approval Name and Organisation Position Date signature X London Southend X 27 May 2014 Airport London Southend X X 27 May 2014 Airport London Southend X X 29 May 2014 Airport COPYRIGHT © 2014 Cyrrus Limited This document and the information contained therein is the property Cyrrus Limited.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Select Committee Inquiry Into Smaller Airports
    Transport Select Committee Inquiry into Smaller Airports The former airport at Manston, Kent This submission is a combined submission from two local community groups - No Night Flights and Manston Pickle. We represent residents who were affected by the operation of the former airport at Manston. Our submission to this Inquiry about smaller UK airports relates wholly to the former airport at Manston. It draws on our research over a number of years into the airport’s economic and environmental impact on the local area. In many ways this is a strange submission to be making. The owner of the Manston site, Ms Ann Gloag, closed the airport on 15th May 2014 because it was losing £10,000 a day and because she saw no prospect of turning it into a commercial success. Ms Gloag has since sold a majority share to a pair of developers fresh from their recent success at the new Discovery Park at Sandwich - the former Pfizer site. They say they have ruled out using the Manston site as an airport. Our long experience of researching the facts around the airport and its impact has taught us that there is a world of difference between the rhetoric of airport operators and local politicians and the demonstrable facts. We want the Select Committee to have access to what we know about the impact of one small regional airport on the local economy and community. No Night Flights Manston Pickle Executive Summary • After 15 years in private hands, the former RAF base at Manston has not been the hoped-for engine of regeneration for Thanet.
    [Show full text]
  • EGNOS Service Provision Yearly Report 2013
    Service Provision Yearly Report (April 2013-March 2014) EGNOS Service Provision ESSP-DRD-11935P Iss. 01-00 Date: 09/07/2014 ESSP SAS, 18 Avenue Edouard Belin, BPI 602 31401 Toulouse Cedex 9 R.C.S. Toulouse 508 275 286 - SIRET 508 275 286 00013 ESSP is organizing on a yearly basis the EGNOS Service Provision Workshop for EGNOS users and stakeholders, the perfect place in order to receive updated information on the EGNOS system and services, implementation information and success stories and to collect feedback from users and interchange ideas and experiences among EGNOS users in different domains. 2014 EGNOS Service Provision Workshop will be held on 7-8 October in the city of Lisbon. Table of Contents 1 A WORD FROM ESSP’S PRESIDENT ....................................................................................................... 7 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ 8 2.1 EGNOS SERVICE PERFORMANCE .................................................................................................................. 8 2.2 SERVICE PROVISION AND DEVELOPMENT ........................................................................................................ 9 2.3 SYSTEM OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE .................................................................................................... 11 3 SERVICE PERFORMANCES .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Manston Airport Development Consent Order
    Manston Airport Development Consent Order Manston Airport - a Regional and National Asset, Volumes I-IV; an analysis of air freight capacity limitations and constraints in the South East and Manston’s ability to address these and provide for future growth; June 2017 For consultation Scheme Name Manston Airport DCO Promoter’s Name RiverOak Strategic Partners Author Azimuth Associates Document Number TR020002/SC/04 2 2017 Consultation Suite of Consultation Documents 1.1 As part of the statutory consultation under section 47 of the Planning Act 2008 a suite of consultation documents relating to the proposal to reopen Manston Airport is available to the public. Together these documents give an overview of the development proposals including information on the potential benefits and impacts of the Project, environmental considerations and the business case. The documents also provide further information on the consultation process and enable the public to submit their feedback. 1.2 This consultation also forms part of RiverOak’s initial engagement on the design of airspace and procedures associated with the airport. As such it is an opportunity for members of the community to highlight any factors which they believe RiverOak should take into account during that design phase. Having taken all such factors into account, the subsequent proposals for flightpaths and airspace will be subject to a separate round of consultation once the DCO application has been made. 1.3 The suite of consultation documents includes: 1. a Consultation Leaflet giving an overview of the proposals and details of where more information about the Project can be found; 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Long Term Proposals for Development July 2013
    Long Term Proposals for Development July 2013 Long Term Proposals for the Development of Manston – Kent’s International Airport Submission to the Airports Commission 19 July, 2013 1. Introduction This document sets out in outline form, proposals for the long-term development of Manston - Kent’s International Airport. It has been drawn up as a response to the Airport’s Commission’s invitation in its Guidance Document 01: Submitting evidence and proposals to the Airports Commission (Feb 2013), which specifies that submissions should: Outline proposals and give an overview of the level of additional capacity that would be provided, along with some of the key economic, social and environmental considerations associated with it. Adopt an integrated approach to the proposals, taking into account a broad range of factors, including possible problems raised by the proposals and means of resolving or mitigating them. Facilitate the early identification of barriers to delivery of the proposed scheme by indicating whether they stem from legal (UK or EU), technical or other sources. State how the proposals would operate (e.g. the types of aircraft and the mix of short, medium and long-haul traffic they would be able to accommodate), and how they would expect the airline sector, including full-service, low cost and freight carriers and other airports in the UK and internationally, to respond when the additional capacity becomes available. Assess the impacts of the scheme being promoted under six broad categories of factors: economic; social; climate change; local environmental; accessibility and feasibility. Commission Guidance Document No.2: Long Term Options - Sift Criteria, then added ‘strategic fit’ to the above list following consultation on the original list of factors and also split feasibility into ‘cost’ and ‘deliverability’.
    [Show full text]
  • Thanet District Council Thanet Local Plan Revised Options Sustainability Appraisal
    Thanet District Council Thanet Local Plan Revised Options Sustainability Appraisal REP/258960/0001 Issue | June 2018 This report takes into account the particular instructions and requirements of our client. It is not intended for and should not be relied upon by any third party and no responsibility is undertaken to any third party. Job number 258960-00 Ove Arup & Partners Ltd 13 Fitzroy Street London W1T 4BQ United Kingdom www.arup.com Thanet District Council Thanet Local Plan Revised Options Sustainability Appraisal Contents Page 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Previous sustainability appraisal of options 1 1.3 Revised options 1 1.4 Sustainability appraisal process 2 2 Screening 15 3 Option 2 – Sustainability Appraisal 16 3.1 AD 02 – Policy SP02 Economic Growth 16 3.2 AD 04 – SP03 Land allocated for Economic Development 20 3.3 AD05 and AD06 – New Settlement Former Airport Site 24 3.4 AD 09 – Total Housing Supply 28 3.5 AD12 – Policy SP14 – Strategic Housing Sites at Birchington 32 3.6 AD13 – Policy SP15 – Strategic Housing Sites at Westgate-on-sea 36 3.7 AD14 – Policy SP18 – Land at Manston Court Road / Haine Road 40 3.8 AD15 – Policy H02 – Land north and south of Shottendane Road 43 3.9 AD16 – Policy SP30 – Local Green Space 46 3.10 AD19 – (New Policy) Policy H026 – Fostering Homes 47 4 Summary 49 4.1 Option 2 49 REP/258960/0001 | Issue | June 2018 \\GLOBAL.ARUP.COM\LONDON\PTG\ICL-JOBS\258000\258960-00 THANET SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL\4 INTERNAL PROJECT DATA\4-05 ARUP REPORTS\2018 SA ADDENDUM\ANNEX 5 - THANET LOCAL PLAN REVISED OPTIONS SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL - REVISED.DOCX Thanet District Council Thanet Local Plan Revised Options Sustainability Appraisal Subsequently the officer report to Council recommended an option of urban/village edge sites plus the new settlement in order to meet the housing requirement.
    [Show full text]
  • MANSTON AIRPORT Noise Action Plan – First Draft
    MANSTON AIRPORT Noise Action Plan – First Draft Contents Page No. INTRODUCTION TO THIS DRAFT NOISE ACTION PLAN FOR MANSTON AIRPORT .................................... 3 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 4 2.0 NOISE MANAGEMENT ................................................................................................................. 6 3.0 ASSESSMENT OF NOISE MANAGEMENT MEASURES .................................................................. 12 4.0 EVALUATION AND IMPLEMENTATION ........................................................................................ 15 5.0 LONG TERM STRATEGY ............................................................................................................... 15 6.0 summary...................................................................................................................................... 16 Appendix A: Glossary of acoustic and aviation terms Appendix B: Noise contour maps Appendix C: Legislative context for noise management Appendix D: END noise mapping results Appendix E: Public consultation- TBC Appendix F: Consultation remarks and airport responses - TBC Appendix G: Table of compliance with END This report and all matters referred to herein remain confidential to the Client unless specifically authorised otherwise, when reproduction and/or publication is verbatim and without abridgement. This report may not be reproduced in whole or in part or relied upon in any
    [Show full text]
  • Kent and Medway Risk Profile
    Kent & Medway Risk Profile Update 2017 Kent Fire & Rescue Service Kent & Medway Risk Profile Update 2017 Kent & Medway Risk Profile Update 2017 Contents Introduction .............................................................................................................. 4 County Overview ...................................................................................................... 5 Demographics and Population Risk Factors ......................................................... 7 Population ........................................................................................................................................... 7 Household Types ................................................................................................................................. 9 Deprivation ....................................................................................................................................... 10 Overall County Risk ............................................................................................... 12 Dwellings ........................................................................................................................................... 12 Special Service RTC ........................................................................................................................... 13 Future Risk Modelling ....................................................................................................................... 13 Geodemographic Segmentation ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Plymouth Airport Study Final Report
    Plymouth City Council Plymouth Airport Study Final Report Plymouth City Council Plymouth Airport Study Final Report Issue | 11 September 2014 This report takes into account the particular instructions and requirements of our client. It is not intended for and should not be relied upon by any third party and no responsibility is undertaken to any third party. Job number 229666-00 Ove Arup & Partners Ltd 13 Fitzroy Street London W1T 4BQ United Kingdom www.arup.com Plymouth City Council Plymouth Airport Study Final Report Contents Page Executive Summary 1 1 Introduction 7 2 Stakeholder Engagement 8 2.1 Sutton Harbour Holdings 8 2.2 Viable Plymouth Limited 9 2.3 Plymouth Chamber of Commerce & Industry 10 2.4 Civil Aviation Authority 12 3 Recent Studies 14 3.1 Fjori’s Aviation Study 14 3.2 York Aviation’s Plymouth City Airport Study 15 4 Option Assessment Methodology 18 4.1 Options Development 18 4.2 Option Assessment Objectives 21 4.3 Assessment Matrix 22 5 Options Assessment 26 5.1 Option 1 26 5.2 Option 2 29 5.3 Option 3 33 5.4 Option 4 36 5.5 Option 5 40 5.6 Option 6 43 5.7 Option 7 43 5.8 Option 8 44 5.9 Summary Score Table 45 6 Summary 46 6.1 Options 1, 2 & 3 46 6.2 Options 4, 5 & 6 46 6.3 Option 7 47 6.4 Option 8 48 7 Potential Changes for Aviation 49 8 Conclusions 53 8.1 Overview 53 | Issue | 11 September 2014 Plymouth City Council Plymouth Airport Study Final Report Appendix A Policy Review Appendix B Infrastructure Review Appendix C Demand Forecast Appendix D Sutton Harbour Holdings Meeting Minutes Appendix E Viable Plymouth Limited
    [Show full text]
  • Council 12 January 2012 Airport Proposals in Medway and Kent
    COUNCIL 12 JANUARY 2012 AIRPORT PROPOSALS IN MEDWAY AND KENT Portfolio Holder: Councillor Rodney Chambers, Leader Report from: Robin Cooper, Director of Regeneration, Community and Culture Summary This report advises Members of the 3 current proposals for International Airports in Medway and Kent and recommends strong opposition to all the proposals. 1. Budget and Policy Framework 1.1 This is a matter for Council because of the potential for decisions which may seek to amend the existing policy framework and budget. 2. Background 2.1 Plans for international airports in and around Medway and Kent date back to the 1950s. For sixty years the community has been defending this corner of England against inappropriate airport proposals. There are currently three new proposals for International Airports in, or close to, Medway. 2.2 Firstly a proposal by Boris Johnson, Mayor of London, for an International Airport on reclaimed land in the Thames Estuary north east of Sheppey and Whitstable. It is sometimes referred to as “Boris Island”. A £40 - £50 billion proposal on an artificial island 4800m long and 1800m wide connected by a high speed train line directly from Ashford, from Ebbsfleet, and also from Southend – requiring 48 miles of new rail line to be laid. The Mayor’s report suggests the building of a road link across the Isle of Grain linking the M2 and M20 motorways. 2.3 The Council has strongly opposed this road proposal. The Chancellor in his Autumn Statement referred to the need to construct a new Dartford Crossing. This was flagged up in the Dartford River Crossing Study – A Lower Thames Crossing.
    [Show full text]
  • Macquarie Infrastructure and Real Assets Credentials
    Macquarie Infrastructure and Real Assets Credentials 30 September 2015 Disclaimer This presentation is not an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to subscribe or purchase or a recommendation of any securities or interests referred to in this presentation and has been created by the Macquarie Infrastructure and Real Assets (“MIRA”) division of Macquarie Group Limited to provide readers with general information in respect of the funds management business carried on by MIRA. The information in this presentation may not be incorporated into any documents or presentations prepared by or for the reader without the consent of Macquarie. This presentation incorporates third party information from sources believed to be reliable. The accuracy of such information (including all assumptions) has not been independently verified by Macquarie and Macquarie cannot guarantee its accuracy or completeness. Except as required by law, Macquarie and the MIRA funds mentioned in this presentation and their respective directors, officers, employees, agents and consultants make no representation or warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this presentation. Past performance of MIRA funds is not an indication of future performance and Macquarie does not guarantee the performance or return of capital from any investment in any MIRA fund. None of the entities noted in this presentation is an authorised deposit-taking institution for the purposes of the Banking Act 1959 (Commonwealth of Australia). The obligations of these entities do not represent deposits or other liabilities of Macquarie Bank Limited (ABN 46 008 583 542) (“MBL”). MBL does not guarantee or otherwise provide assurance in respect of the obligations of these entities.
    [Show full text]