DOCSLIB.ORG

Kent and Medway Risk Profile

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kent and Medway Risk Profile Kent & Medway Risk Profile Update 2017 Kent Fire & Rescue Service Kent & Medway Risk Profile Update 2017 Kent & Medway Risk Profile Update 2017 Contents Introduction .............................................................................................................. 4 County Overview ...................................................................................................... 5 Demographics and Population Risk Factors ......................................................... 7 Population ........................................................................................................................................... 7 Household Types ................................................................................................................................. 9 Deprivation ....................................................................................................................................... 10 Overall County Risk ............................................................................................... 12 Dwellings ........................................................................................................................................... 12 Special Service RTC ........................................................................................................................... 13 Future Risk Modelling ....................................................................................................................... 13 Geodemographic Segmentation ........................................................................... 14 Building Usage as a Risk Identifier ....................................................................... 15 Other Building Risks .............................................................................................. 15 Sleeping Accommodation Risk .......................................................................................................... 15 Hospitals ........................................................................................................................................ 16 Care Homes ................................................................................................................................... 17 HMOs ............................................................................................................................................ 18 Hotels ............................................................................................................................................ 19 Non Sleeping Accommodation Risk .................................................................................................. 20 Factories or Warehouses .............................................................................................................. 21 Further Education Establishments ................................................................................................ 22 Licensed Premises ......................................................................................................................... 23 Offices ........................................................................................................................................... 24 Premises Open to the Public ......................................................................................................... 25 Other Sleeping Accommodation ................................................................................................... 26 Other Workplaces ......................................................................................................................... 27 Public Buildings ............................................................................................................................. 28 Schools .......................................................................................................................................... 29 Shops ............................................................................................................................................. 30 Specific Risks ......................................................................................................... 31 COMAH Sites ..................................................................................................................................... 31 Site Specific Risk ................................................................................................................................ 31 Infrastructure Risk ................................................................................................. 32 Roads ................................................................................................................................................. 32 Kent & Medway Risk Profile Update 2017 Rail .................................................................................................................................................... 32 Aviation ............................................................................................................................................. 32 Ports .................................................................................................................................................. 32 Sites of Specific Scientific Interest (SSSI) ........................................................... 34 Flooding .................................................................................................................. 35 Existing KFRS Arrangements ............................................................................... 36 Future Development ............................................................................................... 37 Ashford .............................................................................................................................................. 38 Canterbury ........................................................................................................................................ 38 Dartford ............................................................................................................................................. 39 Dover ................................................................................................................................................. 39 Gravesham ........................................................................................................................................ 40 Maidstone ......................................................................................................................................... 40 Medway ............................................................................................................................................ 41 Sevenoaks ......................................................................................................................................... 41 Shepway ............................................................................................................................................ 42 Swale ................................................................................................................................................. 42 Thanet ............................................................................................................................................... 43 Tonbridge & Malling ......................................................................................................................... 43 Tunbridge Wells ................................................................................................................................ 44 Kent & Medway Risk Profile Update 2017 Introduction The role of the Fire Service and its statutory duties are defined within the Fire and Rescue Services Act 2004. Alongside this, The Civil Contingencies Act 2004 defines the roles and responsibilities of the Fire and Rescue Authority in relation to civil protection and resilience arrangements, along with those of other regional public bodies. The above legislation focuses on our statutory duty to respond to fire and fire related incidents. Services must also consider the contents and guidance within The Fire and Rescue National Framework for England 2012, which outlines the priorities and objectives of the government for fire and rescue authorities. One of the key priorities within the national framework outlines: “Identify and assess the full range of foreseeable fire and rescue related risks their areas face, make provision for prevention, protection activities, and respond to incidents appropriately” In conjunction with our response, prevention and protection activities the authority conducts risk and workload modelling to support the production of plans and policies which underpin Kent & Medway Fire & Rescue Authority’s (KMFRA) aims and objectives. In 2016 KMFRA conducted a wide ranging and in depth review of the provison of emergency response within Kent and Medway which underpinned the previous Safety and Wellbeing Plan. Analysis was conducted across the county and profiles were generated for smaller geoghraphic areas which allowed for easier reporting and comparisons of the wide ranging analysis conducted. These smaller geoghraphic areas are referred to as Clusters and align with our management areas based on internal working arrangements and the day to day work activities of personnel. Following the completion of the review in
Load more

Recommended publications
  • AOA-Summer-2015.Pdf
    THE AIRPORT OPERATORTHE OFFICIAL MAGAZINE OF THE AIRPORT OPERATORS ASSOCIATION DELIVERING A BETTER AIRPORT London Luton Features DELIVERING A A LEAP OF FAITH BETTER LUTON Charlotte Osborn, Chaplain, Chief Executive, Nick Barton Newcastle International SECURITY STANDARDS SMALLER AIRPORTS THE WAY AHEAD The House of Commons Transport Peter Drissell, Director of Select Committee reports SUMMER 2015 Aviation Security, CAA ED ANDERSON Introduction to the Airport Operator THE AIRPORT the proposal that APD be devolved in MARTIJN KOUDIJS PETE COLLINS PETE BARNFIELD MARK GILBERT Scotland. The Scottish Government AIRPORT NEEDS ENGINEERING SYSTEM DESIGN BAGGAGE IT OPERATOR THE OFFICIAL MAGAZINE OF THE AIRPORT OPERATORS ASSOCIATION has made it clear that it will seek GARY MCWILLIAM ALEC GILBERT COLIN MARNANE SERVICE DELIVERY CUSTOMER SOLUTIONS INSTALLATION to halve the APD rate in Scotland. AIRPORT OPERATORS ASSOCIATION Whilst we welcome reductions in the current eye watering levels of APD, Ed Anderson we absolutely insist on a reduction Chairman anywhere in the UK being matched by Darren Caplan the same reduction everywhere else. Chief Executive We will also be campaigning for the Tim Alderslade Government to incentivise the take up Public Affairs & PR Director of sustainable aviation fuels, which is Roger Koukkoullis an I welcome readers to this, an initiative being promoted by the Operations, Safety & Events Director the second of the new look Sustainable Aviation coalition. This Airport Operator magazine. I has the potential to contribute £480 Peter O’Broin C hope you approve of the new format. million to the UK economy by 2030. Policy Manager Sally Grimes Since the last edition we have of We will also be urging real reductions Events & Member Relations Executive course had a General Election.
    [Show full text]
  • Progress Summary
    CLIMATE EMERGENCY PROGRESS CHECKLIST - 10 December 2019 NB. This is work in progress! We have almost certainly missed some actions. Please contact [email protected] with any news or updates. County/Authority Council Status County/Authority Council Status Brighton & Hove BRIGHTON & HOVE CITY COUNCIL DECLARED Dec 2018 KENT COUNTY COUNCIL Motion Passed May 2019 WEST SUSSEX COUNTY COUNCIL Motion Passed - April 2019 Ashford Borough Council Motion Passed July 2019 Adur Borough Council DECLARED July 2019 Canterbury City Council DECLARED July 2019 Arun District Council DECLARED Nov 2019 Dartford Borough Council DECLARED Oct 2019 Chichester City Council DECLARED June 2019 Dover District Council Campaign in progress West Sussex Chichester District Council DECLARED July 2019 Folkestone and Hythe District Council DECLARED July 2019 Crawley Borough Council DECLARED July 2019 Gravesham Borough Council DECLARED June 2019 Kent Horsham District Council Motion Passed - June 2019 Maidstone Borough Council DECLARED April 2019 Mid Sussex District Council Motion Passed - June 2019 Medway Council DECLARED April 2019 Worthing Borough Council DECLARED July 2019 Sevenoaks District Council Motion Passed - Nov 2019 EAST SUSSEX COUNTY COUNCIL DECLARED Oct 2019 Swale Borough Council DECLARED June 2019 Eastbourne Borough Council DECLARED July 2019 Thanet District Council DECLARED July 2019 Hastings Borough Council DECLARED Dec 2018 Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council Motion Passed July 2019 East Sussex Lewes District Council DECLARED July 2019 Tunbridge
    [Show full text]
  • Review Into the Best Value Delivery of the Environmental Health out of Hours Service for Sevenoaks District Council [And Dartford Borough Council]
    REVIEW INTO THE BEST VALUE DELIVERY OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OUT OF HOURS SERVICE FOR SEVENOAKS DISTRICT COUNCIL [AND DARTFORD BOROUGH COUNCIL] Cabinet - 19 April 2018 Report of the: Chief Officer Environmental & Operational Services Status: For recommendation to Cabinet Also considered by: Direct and Trading Advisory Committee - 13 March 2018 Key Decision: Yes Executive Summary: The shared service Environmental Health team currently provides an Out of Hours (OOH) Service to deal with complaints from residents within the Sevenoaks and Dartford districts. This service currently operates everyday throughout the year between 17:00 and 22:00 Monday to Thursday, 17:00 to 00:00 Friday, 08:00 to 00:00 Saturday and 08:00 to 22:00 Sunday. Demand for the service is shown to vary significantly throughout the year and by day of the week. Many of the calls received are not urgent and do not require immediate action. These can be managed the next working day during office hours in accordance with agreed performance indicators. In the past 18 months, experienced officers have left the OOH Service, and there is now a serious issue with fully staffing the Service in its existing format. This report recommends that the OOH service targets Environmental Health Officer resource at times of peak demand whilst simultaneously empowering the CCTV team to respond, record and provide advice to the majority of ‘one off’ complaints received by the service. The existing OOH provision for serious or emergency public health complaints will be extended via a year round cascade call system. This report supports the Key Aim of Safe Communities and Green Environment Portfolio Holder Cllr.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Item No 4 4 Minutes of the Meeting of the EAST KENT (JOINT SCRUTINY) COMMITTEE Held at the Council Offices, Whitfield On
    Agenda Item No 4 Minutes of the meeting of the EAST KENT (JOINT SCRUTINY) COMMITTEE held at the Council Offices, Whitfield on Wednesday 25 April 2012 at 9.30 am. Present: Chairman: Councillor K Mills (Dover District Council) Councillors: B Copping (Shepway District Council) G Glover (Canterbury City Council) I Gregory (Thanet District Council) D Hannent (Dover District Council) G Lymer (Dover District Council) Z Wiltshire (Thanet District Council) Also Present: Director of Shared Services (EK Services) Officers: Chief Executive (Dover District Council) Solicitor to the Council (Dover District Council) Democratic Support Officer (Dover District Council) Apologies for absence were received from Councillors H Cragg, M Dance, C Goddard, D Green, J Holben, I Linfield, R Manning and M Vye. 13 ELECTION OF A CHAIRMAN It was proposed by Councillor G Lymer, duly seconded and RESOLVED: That Councillor K Mills be appointed Chairman for the duration of the meeting. 14 DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST There were no declarations of interest made by Members. 15 MINUTES The Minutes of the meetings of the Committee held on 25 January 2012 were approved as a correct record and signed by the Chairman. 16 OPERATING ARRANGEMENTS The Committee considered the operating arrangements. RESOLVED: That the operating arrangements be noted. 17 ISSUES REFERRED TO THE COMMITTEE BY THE EAST KENT (JOINT ARRANGEMENTS) COMMITTEE The Committee noted that at the meeting of the East Kent (Joint Arrangements) Committee (EKJAC) held on 14 March 2012 it had been resolved to undertake a review of the operating arrangements of the two East Kent committees, which would be reported to the next meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Tourism and Culture Strategy Development Update Report To
    Subject: Tourism and Culture Strategy Development Update Report to: ELT – Monday 5th November 2018 Economic Development Committee – Monday 19th November 2018 Report by: Kate Watts – Strategic Director Paula Boyce – Head of IT Marketing and Communications This report provides committee Members with an update of progress on the development a new Tourism and Culture Strategy for the Borough and in doing so, it asks Members to resolve to a number of additional developmental steps being taken with an amended timeline for the completion of the work to April 2019. To undertake these additional developmental steps Members are asked to allocate £20,000 from the Council’s special projects reserve funding. 1. BACKGROUND 1.1 On Monday 16th July 2018 Members of Economic Development Committee resolved to create a new Tourism and Culture Strategy for Great Yarmouth. 1.2 Since the Council’s Economic Development Committee resolved to develop the new Tourism and Culture Strategy, a number of activities have taken place. This report updates Members with progress so far and outlines to Members the next steps in creating what has been recognised by our stakeholders as an important document for the Borough. 2. PROGRESS SO FAR 2.1 As part of the development work for this strategy, officers and Members from the Council’s Economic Development Committee undertook a study tour in October visiting cultural attractions in both Hastings and Margate. In doing so, the group met with officers, Members and private sector partners in both Thanet District Council and Hastings Borough Council area, learning about the role of each Council in terms of catalysts for investment to add value to and improve the local tourism and cultural offer in each area.
    [Show full text]
  • Streets for All South East
    Streets for All South East Consultation draft copy Summary In 2017 Historic England published an updated national edition of Streets for All, a practical guide for anyone involved in planning and implementing highways and other public realm works in sensitive historic locations. It shows how improvements can be made to public spaces without harming their valued character, including specific recommendations for works to surfaces, street furniture, new equipment, traffic management infrastructure and environmental improvements. This supplementary document summarises the key messages of Streets for All in the context of the South East. It begins by explaining how historic character adds value to the region’s contemporary public realm before summarising some of the priorities and opportunities for further improvements to the South East’s streetscape. This guidance has been prepared by Martin Small, Historic Places Advisor in the South East, and Rowan Whimster. First published by English Heritage 20Ǔǘ. This edition published by Historic England 2017. All images © Historic England unless otherwise stated. Please refer to this document as: Historic England 2017 Streets for All: South East Swindon. Historic England. HistoricEngland.org.uk/advice/caring-for-heritage/streets-for-all/ Front cover: Guildford, Surrey Granite setts have been a defining feature of Guildford’s steeply sloping High Street for 150 years. After years of unsatisfactory patched repairs, Surrey County Council recently took the bold decision to relay the 115,000 original setts using modern grouting products that reduce the trip hazards and maintain a consistent contour across the road, thus making it much easier for pedestrians to walk on. © Eilís Byrne The public realm From Kent to Oxfordshire, the South East of on the safety of children and on accessibility for England contains a wealth of historic cities, towns everyone.
    [Show full text]
  • Dover District Date of Review
    Safe and Sensible Street Lighting Project - Review of Trial Switch-Off – Dover District Date of Review: Sites originally proposed for inclusion in the trial switch-off but subsequently withdrawn: East Kent Access Location B East Kent Access Location C A256 By-Pass – Right Turn Lane Venson A256 By-Pass – Right Turn Lane Tilmanstone A256 By-Pass – Right Turn Lane Eythorne Sites originally proposed for inclusion in the trial switch-off but subsequently modified to part-night lighting: East Kent Access Location A – Sandwich by-pass (22 lights) East Kent Access Location D – Monks Way (23 lights) East Kent Access Location E – Ramsgate Road (56 lights) East Kent Access South – Ramsgate Road (6 lights) Sites included in the trial switch-off: Whitfield Hill (31 lights) A258 Sandwich By-Pass – Sandwich Road (28 lights) Betteshanger Road (24 lights) Folkestone Road, Farthingloe (61 lights) Review of Trial Switch-Off – Dover District Site location Whitfield Hill Remarks No. of lights switched 31 - off No. of lights converted 0 - to part night Lights switched off/ 22/08/2013 - converted (DATE) Police: crime and anti- social behaviour issues 19/12/13 - Theft from Motor Vehicle (Lorry in Layby) Period: August 2013 - - 03.00. December 2014 Lack of street lighting could have contributed to the crimes but this has not been highlighted as a major contributory factor. Police remarks Trial switch off has not had an adverse impact. The theft from M/V on Whitfield Hill was against a lorry in the layby overnight, the theft in Ash was against unsecure flats which were under construction near the junction.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 90 November 2017
    Newsletter No. 90 November 2017 Shakespeare Colliery Owned by Kent Collieries The Times 24 April 1912 THE DOVER SOCIETY FOUNDED IN 1988 Affiliated to the Kent Federation of Amenity Societies Registered Charity No. 299954 pr esid en t v ice-presidents Mrs Joan Liggett, Jonathan Sloggett, Terry Sutton, Miss Christine Waterman THE COMMITTEE Ch a ir m a n Derek Leach OBE, 24 Riverdale, River, Dover CT17 0GX Tel: 01304 823926 Email: [email protected] Vic e -Ch a ir m a n Jeremy Cope, 53 Park Avenue, Dover CT16 1HD Tfel: 01304 211348 Email: [email protected] Ho n . Se c r eta r y Beverley Hall, 61 castle Avenue, Dover cT16 1EZ Tfel: 01304 202646 Email: [email protected] Ho n . Tr e a s u r e r Mike Weston, 71 Castle Avenue, Dover CT16 1EZ Tfel: 01304 202059 Email: [email protected] Me m b e rs h ip Se c r e t a r y Sheila Cope, 53 Park Avenue, Dover CT16 1HD Tfel: 01304 211348 Email: [email protected] Su m m e r So c i a l Se c r e ta r y Patricia Hooper-Sherratt, Castle Lea, Tkswell St, Dover CT16 1SG Tfel: 01304 228129 Email: [email protected] Wi n t e r So c i a l Se c r e ta r y Beverley Hall, 61 Castle Avenue, Dover CT16 1EZ Tel: 01304 202646 Email: [email protected] Ed it o r Alan Lee, 8 Cherry Tree Avenue, Dover CT16 2NL Tfel: 01304 213668 Email: [email protected] Pr e s s Se c r e t a r y Tferry Sutton MBE, 17 Bewsbury Cross Lane, Whitfield, Dover CT16 3HB Tel: 01304 820122 Email: [email protected] Pl a n n in g Chairman Pat Sherratt, Castle Lea, Thswell Street, Dover CT16 1SG Tfel: 01304 228129 Email: [email protected] Committee Alan Sencicle, Mike Weston, Beverley Hall, Brian Margery, Sandra Conlon Refubishment Chairman Jeremy Cope Committee John Cotton, Mike McFarnell, Jenny Olpin, Jim Pople, Mike Weston, Alan Sencicle Ar c h iv is t Dr S.S.G.
    [Show full text]
  • THE COASTAL COMMUNITIES of SOUTH EAST ENGLAND Recommendations to the South East
    THE COASTAL COMMUNITIES OF SOUTH EAST ENGLAND Recommendations to the South East LEP Prof Steve Fothergill Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research Sheffield Hallam University Final report December 2012 1 Summary This report considers the policy implications arising from a statistical review of the South East’s coastal communities, completed in April 2012. It also builds on discussions involving coastal local authorities, private sector representatives and other local partners. The statistical review identified the South East’s coastal communities, which have a combined population of one million or around a quarter of the LEP total, as on average an area of social and economic disadvantage, well adrift of LEP averages and sometimes behind national averages as well. The review also flagged up important differences between places along the coast and put forward a six-fold classification of areas that has won wide support. The present report makes ten recommendations: 1. The South East LEP needs to be ‘spatially aware’. The big internal differences within the LEP area, and in particular the distinctive needs of the coastal strip, need to inform the full range of LEP activities. 2. Strategic plans and priorities should give special attention to the coastal strip. This includes in the allocation of resources. 3. Transport links to parts of the coast need improvement. Accessibility remains an important constraint in a number of local areas. 4. The seaside tourist industry should be treated as one of the drivers of economic growth. Tourism along the coast continues to employ as many people as manufacturing, and there are opportunities for growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Waste Management Guidance for Residents
    Kent County Council Waste Management Guide to household waste disposal Guidance document for residents September 2019 4 kent.gov.uk This document can be made available in other formats or languages. To request this, please email [email protected] or telephone 03000 421553 (text relay service 18001 03000 421553). This number goes to an answer machine, which is monitored during office hours. Or write to: Kent County Council, Diversity & Equality Team Room G37, Sessions House, County Hall, Maidstone, Kent, ME14 1XQ 2 Contents Responsibility for Waste Background Information 4 Roles of Authorities in Kent & Current Performance 5 Waste Segregation 6-17 Household Waste Recycling Centres 18-20 Conclusion 21 Waste Collection Authority Contacts 22 Quicklinks 23 Kent County Council Waste Management Mission Our Ambition is to deliver a high quality household waste disposal service, whilst remaining cost- effective for the people of Kent, with an emphasis on waste reduction, reuse, recycling and achieving zero landfill 3 Collection and disposal of waste Background Information Kent County Council (KCC) works in partnership with the Kent District and Borough Councils to find the best solution for the household waste that requires disposal. The aim of this document is to provide clear guidance to residents so they can dispose of their waste in a way that is in line with the Waste Hierarchy enabling waste to be reduced, reused or recycled where possible; and waste being sent for incineration or landfill is as minimal as possible. Prevention Most preferred Preparing for re-use Recycling Other recovery Disposal Least preferred 4 Roles of authorities in Kent District and Borough Councils are Waste Collection Authorities (WCAs) and they are responsible for collecting household waste from residents’ houses, referred to as kerbside collections.
    [Show full text]
  • District 105SE.PDF
    Summary of Family Membership and Gender by Club MBR0018 as of December, 2009 Club Fam. Unit Fam. Unit Club Ttl. Club Ttl. District Number Club Name HH's 1/2 Dues Females Male TOTAL District 105SE 20023 BECKENHAM AND WEST WICKHAM 0 0 5 14 19 District 105SE 20024 BEXHILL ON SEA 3 3 7 18 25 District 105SE 20025 BEXLEY SIDCUP 2 4 1 18 19 District 105SE 20026 BILLINGSHURST & DISTRICT 0 0 4 22 26 District 105SE 20027 BOGNOR REGIS 0 0 5 19 24 District 105SE 20028 BRIGHTON 1 1 1 29 30 District 105SE 20029 BURGESS HILL DISTRICT 7 7 16 26 42 District 105SE 20030 CANTERBURY 0 0 0 21 21 District 105SE 20031 CHANCTONBURY 1 1 1 31 32 District 105SE 20032 CHICHESTER 2 2 5 22 27 District 105SE 20033 CRAWLEY 1 1 2 6 8 District 105SE 20034 CROYDON 0 0 6 11 17 District 105SE 20035 DARTFORD 2 2 3 15 18 District 105SE 20036 DOVER DISTRICT L C 2 2 4 18 22 District 105SE 20037 EAST GRINSTEAD 0 0 0 34 34 District 105SE 20038 EASTBOURNE 0 0 8 21 29 District 105SE 20039 FARNHAM 1 1 10 37 47 District 105SE 20040 FOLKESTONE 0 0 0 22 22 District 105SE 20041 FRIMLEY & CAMBERLEY 0 0 0 22 22 District 105SE 20042 GILLINGHAM 1 1 4 16 20 District 105SE 20043 GRAVESEND DIST 0 0 1 23 24 District 105SE 20044 GUILDFORD 0 0 1 43 44 District 105SE 20045 HAILSHAM 3 3 8 21 29 District 105SE 20046 HASTINGS 2 2 5 21 26 District 105SE 20047 HAYWARDS HEATH 0 0 12 23 35 District 105SE 20048 WHITSTABLE AND HERNE BAY 6 6 21 14 35 District 105SE 20049 HORLEY 0 0 0 29 29 District 105SE 20050 HORSHAM 5 5 11 17 28 District 105SE 20051 HOVE 0 0 2 12 14 District 105SE 20053 LEATHERHEAD & DISTRICT
    [Show full text]
  • London Southend Airport (LSA) Proposal to Re-Establish Controlled Airspace in the Vicinity of LSA
    London Southend Airport (LSA) Proposal to Re-establish Controlled Airspace in The Vicinity Of LSA Airspace Change Proposal Management in Confidence London Southend Airport (LSA) Proposal to Re-establish Controlled Airspace in The Vicinity Of LSA Document information London Southend Airport (LSA) Proposal to Re-establish Document title Controlled Airspace in The Vicinity Of LSA Authors LSA Airspace Development Team and Cyrrus Ltd London Southend Airport Southend Airport Company Ltd Southend Airport Produced by Southend on Sea Essex SS2 6YF Produced for London Southend Airport X London Southend Airport T: X Contact F: X E: X Version Issue 1.0 Copy Number 1 of 3 Date of release 29 May 2014 Document reference CL-4835-ACP-136 Issue 1.0 Change History Record Change Issue Date Details Reference Draft A Initial draft for comment Draft B Initial comments incorporated – Further reviews Draft C 23 May 2014 Airspace Development Team final comments Final 27 May 2014 Final Review Draft D Issue 1.0 29 May 2014 Initial Issue CL-4835-ACP-136 Issue 1.0 London Southend Airport 1 of 165 Management in Confidence London Southend Airport (LSA) Proposal to Re-establish Controlled Airspace in The Vicinity Of LSA Controlled Copy Distribution Copy Number Ownership 1. UK Civil Aviation Authority – Safety and Airspace Regulation Group 2. London Southend Airport 3. Cyrrus Ltd Document Approval Name and Organisation Position Date signature X London Southend X 27 May 2014 Airport London Southend X X 27 May 2014 Airport London Southend X X 29 May 2014 Airport COPYRIGHT © 2014 Cyrrus Limited This document and the information contained therein is the property Cyrrus Limited.
    [Show full text]