Copepoda: Calanoida) from Lake Faro (Central Mediterranean Sea) C
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Molecular Species Delimitation and Biogeography of Canadian Marine Planktonic Crustaceans
Molecular Species Delimitation and Biogeography of Canadian Marine Planktonic Crustaceans by Robert George Young A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Integrative Biology Guelph, Ontario, Canada © Robert George Young, March, 2016 ABSTRACT MOLECULAR SPECIES DELIMITATION AND BIOGEOGRAPHY OF CANADIAN MARINE PLANKTONIC CRUSTACEANS Robert George Young Advisors: University of Guelph, 2016 Dr. Sarah Adamowicz Dr. Cathryn Abbott Zooplankton are a major component of the marine environment in both diversity and biomass and are a crucial source of nutrients for organisms at higher trophic levels. Unfortunately, marine zooplankton biodiversity is not well known because of difficult morphological identifications and lack of taxonomic experts for many groups. In addition, the large taxonomic diversity present in plankton and low sampling coverage pose challenges in obtaining a better understanding of true zooplankton diversity. Molecular identification tools, like DNA barcoding, have been successfully used to identify marine planktonic specimens to a species. However, the behaviour of methods for specimen identification and species delimitation remain untested for taxonomically diverse and widely-distributed marine zooplanktonic groups. Using Canadian marine planktonic crustacean collections, I generated a multi-gene data set including COI-5P and 18S-V4 molecular markers of morphologically-identified Copepoda and Thecostraca (Multicrustacea: Hexanauplia) species. I used this data set to assess generalities in the genetic divergence patterns and to determine if a barcode gap exists separating interspecific and intraspecific molecular divergences, which can reliably delimit specimens into species. I then used this information to evaluate the North Pacific, Arctic, and North Atlantic biogeography of marine Calanoida (Hexanauplia: Copepoda) plankton. -
A Synthesis Tree of the Copepoda: Integrating Phylogenetic and Taxonomic Data Reveals Multiple Origins of Parasitism
A synthesis tree of the Copepoda: integrating phylogenetic and taxonomic data reveals multiple origins of parasitism James P. Bernot1,2, Geoffrey A. Boxshall3 and Keith A. Crandall1,2 1 Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC, United States of America 2 Computational Biology Institute, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States of America 3 Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom ABSTRACT The Copepoda is a clade of pancrustaceans containing 14,485 species that are extremely varied in their morphology and lifestyle. Not only do copepods dominate marine plank- ton and sediment communities and make up a sizeable component of the freshwater plankton, but over 6,000 species are symbiotically associated with every major phylum of marine metazoans, mostly as parasites. Unfortunately, our understanding of copepod evolutionary relationships is relatively limited in part because of their extremely divergent morphology, sparse taxon sampling in molecular phylogenetic analyses, a reliance on only a handful of molecular markers, and little taxonomic overlap between phylogenetic studies. Here, a synthesis tree method is used to integrate published phylogenies into a more comprehensive tree of copepods by leveraging phylogenetic and taxonomic data. A literature review in this study finds fewer than 500 species of copepods have been sampled in molecular phylogenetic studies. Using the Open Tree of Life platform, those taxa that have been sampled in previous phylogenetic studies are grafted together and combined with the underlying copepod taxonomic hierarchy from the Open Tree of Life Taxonomy to make a synthesis phylogeny of all copepod species. -
Southeastern Regional Taxonomic Center South Carolina Department of Natural Resources
Southeastern Regional Taxonomic Center South Carolina Department of Natural Resources http://www.dnr.sc.gov/marine/sertc/ Southeastern Regional Taxonomic Center Invertebrate Literature Library (updated 9 May 2012, 4056 entries) (1958-1959). Proceedings of the salt marsh conference held at the Marine Institute of the University of Georgia, Apollo Island, Georgia March 25-28, 1958. Salt Marsh Conference, The Marine Institute, University of Georgia, Sapelo Island, Georgia, Marine Institute of the University of Georgia. (1975). Phylum Arthropoda: Crustacea, Amphipoda: Caprellidea. Light's Manual: Intertidal Invertebrates of the Central California Coast. R. I. Smith and J. T. Carlton, University of California Press. (1975). Phylum Arthropoda: Crustacea, Amphipoda: Gammaridea. Light's Manual: Intertidal Invertebrates of the Central California Coast. R. I. Smith and J. T. Carlton, University of California Press. (1981). Stomatopods. FAO species identification sheets for fishery purposes. Eastern Central Atlantic; fishing areas 34,47 (in part).Canada Funds-in Trust. Ottawa, Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada, by arrangement with the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, vols. 1-7. W. Fischer, G. Bianchi and W. B. Scott. (1984). Taxonomic guide to the polychaetes of the northern Gulf of Mexico. Volume II. Final report to the Minerals Management Service. J. M. Uebelacker and P. G. Johnson. Mobile, AL, Barry A. Vittor & Associates, Inc. (1984). Taxonomic guide to the polychaetes of the northern Gulf of Mexico. Volume III. Final report to the Minerals Management Service. J. M. Uebelacker and P. G. Johnson. Mobile, AL, Barry A. Vittor & Associates, Inc. (1984). Taxonomic guide to the polychaetes of the northern Gulf of Mexico. -
Guide to the Coastal and Surface Zooplankton of the South-Western Indian Ocean
GUIDE TO THE COASTAL AND SURFACE ZOOPLANKTON OF THE SOUTH-WESTERN INDIAN OCEAN David VP Conway Rowena G White Joanna Hugues-Dit-Ciles Christopher P Gallienne David B Robins DEFRA Darwin Initiative Zooplankton Programme Version 1 June 2003 Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom Occasional Publication No 15 GUIDE TO THE COASTAL AND SURFACE ZOOPLANKTON OF THE SOUTH-WESTERN INDIAN OCEAN David VP Conway Marine Biological Association Plymouth Rowena G White University of Wales Bangor Joanna Hugues-Dit-Ciles, Christopher P Gallienne and David B Robins Plymouth Marine Laboratory UK-DEFRA Darwin Initiative Project 162/09/004 Zooplankton of the Mascarene Plateau Version 1 June 2003 Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom Occasional Publication No 15 General disclaimer The authors, the Marine Biological Association and the Plymouth Marine Laboratory do not guarantee that this publication is without flaw of any kind and disclaims all liability for any error, loss, or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. Citation Conway, D.V.P., White, R.G., Hugues-Dit-Ciles, J., Gallienne, C.P., Robins, D.B. (2003). Guide to the coastal and surface zooplankton of the south-western Indian Ocean, Occasional Publication of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, No 15, Plymouth, UK. Electronic copies This guide is available for download, without charge, from the Plymouth Marine Laboratory Website at http://www.pml.ac.uk/sharing/zooplankton.htm. © 2003 by the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom and the Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth, UK. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form without permission of the authors. -
Downloaded from Brill.Com10/08/2021 04:26:34AM Via Free Access
Contributions to Zoology 88 (2019) 297-349 CTOZ brill.com/ctoz A review of Caribbean Copepoda associated with reef-dwelling cnidarians, echinoderms and sponges Oksana A. Korzhavina Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Biological Faculty, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia Bert W. Hoeksema Taxonomy and Systematics Group, Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, The Netherlands Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands Viatcheslav N. Ivanenko Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Biological Faculty, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia Taxonomy and Systematics Group, Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, The Netherlands [email protected] Abstract This review of copepod crustaceans associated with reef-dwelling cnidarians, sponges and echinoderms of the Greater Caribbean is based on published records, systematically arranged by the classification of symbiotic copepods and their hosts, sampling sites, coordinates, depth and date of sampling, litera- ture sources, and three recent surveys (Cuba, St. Eustatius in the Eastern Caribbean and Curaçao in the Southern Caribbean). This resulted in totals of 532 records of 115 species of symbiotic copepods (47 gen- era, 17 families, three orders) hosted by 80 species of invertebrates, representing scleractinians (47%), octocorals (9%), echinoderms (3%), and sponges (1%). Among ten Caribbean ecoregions, the Greater Antilles (with 64 species of symbiotic copepods) as well as the Southern and Eastern Caribbean (with 46 and 17 species of copepods, respectively) are the most studied and best represented, whereas only six species of copepods are known from Bermuda, one from Southwestern Caribbean and none from the Gulf of Mexico. The absence of poecilostomatoid copepods (Anchimolgidae, Rhynchomolgidae and Xarifidae) on Caribbean stony corals as noted by Stock (1988) is confirmed. -
National Ballast Water Status Assessment and Economic Assessment JAMAICA
UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST INDIES MONA CAMPUS CENTRE FOR MARINE SCIENCES National Ballast Water Status Assessment and Economic Assessment JAMAICA October, 2016 This Technical Report was prepared by the Centre for Marine Sciences, University of the West Indies, Mona for the Maritime Authority of Jamaica and the GEF-UNDP-IMO GloBallast Partnerships Programme The main author was Dr Dayne Buddo, with significant inputs from Miss Denise Chin, Miss Achsah Mitchell and Mr Stephan Moonsammy Reviewed by Mr Vassilis Tsigourakos (RAC/REMPEITC) and Mr Antoine Blonce (GloBallast) 1 Table of Contents LIST OF FIGURES ..........................................................................................................................3 LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................................5 CHAPTER 1.0: SHIPPING ..............................................................................................................6 1.1 THE ROLE OF SHIPPING ON THE NATIONAL ECONOMY ..............................................6 1.2 PORTS AND HARBOURS .................................................................................................... 13 1.2.1 THE PORT OF KINGSTON ............................................................................................................. 13 1.2.2 PORT RHOADES ........................................................................................................................... 18 1.2.3 MONTEGO BAY .......................................................................................................................... -
WGEUROBUS – Working Group “Towards a European Observatory of the Non-Indigenous Calanoid Copepod Pseudodiaptomus Marinus”
WGEUROBUS – Working Group “Towards a EURopean OBservatory of the non-indigenous calanoid copepod Pseudodiaptomus marinUS” M. Uttieri, L. Aguzzi, R. Aiese Cigliano, A. Amato, N. Bojanić, M. Brunetta, E. Camatti, Y. Carotenuto, T. Damjanović, F. Delpy, et al. Biological Invasions ISSN 1387-3547 Volume 22 Number 3 Biol Invasions (2020) 22:885-906 DOI 10.1007/s10530-019-02174-8 1 23 Your article is protected by copyright and all rights are held exclusively by Springer Nature Switzerland AG. This e-offprint is for personal use only and shall not be self- archived in electronic repositories. If you wish to self-archive your article, please use the accepted manuscript version for posting on your own website. You may further deposit the accepted manuscript version in any repository, provided it is only made publicly available 12 months after official publication or later and provided acknowledgement is given to the original source of publication and a link is inserted to the published article on Springer's website. The link must be accompanied by the following text: "The final publication is available at link.springer.com”. 1 23 Author's personal copy Biol Invasions (2020) 22:885–906 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-019-02174-8 (0123456789().,-volV)( 0123456789().,-volV) PERSPECTIVES AND PARADIGMS WGEUROBUS – Working Group ‘‘Towards a EURopean OBservatory of the non-indigenous calanoid copepod Pseudodiaptomus marinUS’’ M. Uttieri . L. Aguzzi . R. Aiese Cigliano . A. Amato . N. Bojanic´ . M. Brunetta . E. Camatti . Y. Carotenuto . T. Damjanovic´ . F. Delpy . A. de Olazabal . I. Di Capua . J. Falca˜o . M. L. Fernandez de Puelles . -
18 Copépodos
001-470 Entomo (cap1-29) 11/2/05 15:59 Página 303 CURSO PRÁCTICO DE ENTOMOLOGÍA 303-331 18 Copépodos Damià JAUME1, Mercedes CONRADI2, Pablo J. LÓPEZ-GONZÁLEZ2 1. IMEDEA (CSIC-IUB), Instituto Mediterráneo de Estudios Avanzados. C/ Miquel Marquès 21, 07190-Esporles (Illes Balears) 2. Departamento de Fisiología y Zoología, Universidad de Sevilla. C/ Reina Mercedes, 6. 41012-Sevilla Con alrededor de 11.500 especies descritas, constituyen el grupo de metazoos más numero- so en cuanto a individuos se refiere. La cantidad de copépodos presentes en la Tierra en un momento dado es astronómica: piénsese sólo en los alrededor de 1.347 millones de km3 de agua oceánica, y la cifra resultante (1021) de extrapolar a este volumen inmenso una densi- dad de copépodos de sólo 1 ind/m3, muy por debajo por otra parte de las ordinarias determi- nadas directamente en el mar, que oscilan entre los 100 y los 70.000 ind/m3. Principalmen- te acuáticos, aunque se conocen unas pocas especies propias del mantillo de bosques húmedos, han colonizado prácticamente todos los hábitats, desde las fosas oceánicas más profundas hasta lagos de montaña en el Himalaya, así como todo tipo de ambientes extre- mos, desde humeros hidrotermales hasta aguas subterráneas. El grupo ha experimentado una importante radiación adaptativa y diversificación de formas como parásito o comensal de vertebrados e invertebrados acuáticos, sobre todo en el mar, utilizando hasta un total de 16 fila hospedadores distintos. Si bien el número de especies dulceacuícolas es considera- ble (alrededor del 21% de las descritas), la mayor diversificación, en cuanto a taxones de rango supraespecífico se refiere, se alcanza en los océanos. -
Irish Biodiversity: a Taxonomic Inventory of Fauna
Irish Biodiversity: a taxonomic inventory of fauna Irish Wildlife Manual No. 38 Irish Biodiversity: a taxonomic inventory of fauna S. E. Ferriss, K. G. Smith, and T. P. Inskipp (editors) Citations: Ferriss, S. E., Smith K. G., & Inskipp T. P. (eds.) Irish Biodiversity: a taxonomic inventory of fauna. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 38. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland. Section author (2009) Section title . In: Ferriss, S. E., Smith K. G., & Inskipp T. P. (eds.) Irish Biodiversity: a taxonomic inventory of fauna. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 38. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland. Cover photos: © Kevin G. Smith and Sarah E. Ferriss Irish Wildlife Manuals Series Editors: N. Kingston and F. Marnell © National Parks and Wildlife Service 2009 ISSN 1393 - 6670 Inventory of Irish fauna ____________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary.............................................................................................................................................1 Acknowledgements.............................................................................................................................................2 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................................................3 Methodology........................................................................................................................................................................3 -
PHYLUM ARTHROPODA: Subphylum Crustacea: Class Maxillipoda
MARINE ZOOPLANKTON OF SOUTHERN BRITAIN Part 2: Arachnida, Pycnogonida, Cladocera, Facetotecta, Cirripedia and Copepoda David V.P. Conway Edited by Anthony W.G. John Marine Biological Association Occasional Publications0 No 26 1 MARINE ZOOPLANKTON OF SOUTHERN BRITAIN Part 2: Arachnida, Pycnogonida, Cladocera, Facetotecta, Cirripedia and Copepoda David V.P. Conway Marine Biological Association, Plymouth, UK Edited by Anthony W.G. John Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom Occasional Publications No 26 Front cover from top, left to right: Two types of facetotectan nauplii and a cyprid stage from Plymouth (Image: R. Kirby); Larval turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) faeces containing skeletons of the copepod Pseudocalanus elongatus, their undigested eggs and lipid droplets; The cladoceran Podon intermedius; Zooplankton identification course in MBA Resource Centre; Nauplius stage of parasitic barnacle, Peltogaster paguri. 2 Citation Conway, D.V.P. (2012). Marine zooplankton of southern Britain. Part 2: Arachnida, Pycnogonida, Cladocera, Facetotecta, Cirripedia and Copepoda (ed. A.W.G. John). Occasional Publications. Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, No 26 Plymouth, United Kingdom 163 pp. Electronic copies This guide is available for free download, from the National Marine Biological Library website - http://www.mba.ac.uk/NMBL/ from the “Download Occasional Publications of the MBA” section. © 2012 by the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. No part of this publication should be reproduced in any form without consulting the author. ISSN 02602784 This publication has been prepared as accurately as possible, but suggestions or corrections that could be included in any revisions would be gratefully received. [email protected] 3 Preface The range of zooplankton species included in this series of three guides is based on those that have been recorded in the Plymouth Marine Fauna (PMF; Marine Biological Association. -
Phylum ARTHROPODA
152 CRUSTACEA: BRANCHIOPODA-OSTRACODA Phylum ARTHROPODA Sub-Phylum CRUSTACEA Class BRANCHIOPODA Order DIPLOSTRACA Sub-Order CLADOCERA Family Polyphemidae EVADNE NORDMANNI Lovén [Apstein, 1901, p. 12] 1892, appeared beginning of July, still present in Oct. (E.J.B.): 1895, constantly present in Aug.; disappeared early Oct. (T.V.H.): April-May, 1899 (P.T.C.): May, July, Sept. 1903; March-June 1904 (L.H.G.): 1916, began in the end of April and grew very common in May; was common through the summer until the middle of Sept. when it disappeared; 1917-28, might be common any time between March and Oct., very abundant July 1919, 1928, June 1925; inside and outside Sound and Station E.1 (M.V.L.): Hamoaze No. 12 Buoy, in plankton, 20.7.28 (E.P.) Breeding: Aug. (T.V.H.): winter eggs produced about mid-Sept. (E.J.B.) PODON INTERMEDIUS Lilljeborg [Apstein, 1901, p. 14] 1892, became less abundant in July and disappeared about mid-Sept. (E.J.B.): 1895, constantly present in Aug., disappeared early in Oct. (T.V.H.): Plymouth neighbourhood, April-Sept. 1903; April-July 1904 (L.H.G.): very similar in occurrence to Evadne, but is more frequent in Aug. and Sept. 1916, April-Aug. 1917-18; present March-Oct. 1920-8; very abundant Aug. 1922, July 1928; inside and outside Sound, Station E.1 (M.V.L.): River Tamar as far as Black Buoy opposite River Tavy, in plankton; River Lynher, 100 yds. above Antony Creek, Aug.-Sept. 1928 (E.P.): carrying ova, Aug. (T.V.H.) PODON LEUCKARTI Sars [Apstein, 1901, p. -
Crustacea: Copepoda) Received: 21 February 2017 Sahar Khodami1, J
www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Molecular Phylogeny and Revision of Copepod Orders (Crustacea: Copepoda) Received: 21 February 2017 Sahar Khodami1, J. Vaun McArthur2, Leocadio Blanco-Bercial3 & Pedro Martinez Arbizu1 Accepted: 16 June 2017 For the frst time, the phylogenetic relationships between representatives of all 10 copepod orders have Published: xx xx xxxx been investigated using 28S and 18S rRNA, Histone H3 protein and COI mtDNA. The monophyly of Copepoda (including Platycopioida Fosshagen, 1985) is demonstrated for the frst time using molecular data. Maxillopoda is rejected, as it is a polyphyletic group. The monophyly of the major subgroups of Copepoda, including Progymnoplea Lang, 1948 (=Platycopioida); Neocopepoda Huys and Boxshall, 1991; Gymnoplea Giesbrecht, 1892 (=Calanoida Sars, 1903); and Podoplea Giesbrecht, 1892, are supported in this study. Seven copepod orders are monophyletic, including Platycopioida, Calanoida, Misophrioida Gurney, 1933; Monstrilloida Sars, 1901; Siphonostomatoida Burmeister, 1834; Gelyelloida Huys, 1988; and Mormonilloida Boxshall, 1979. Misophrioida (=Propodoplea Lang, 1948) is the most basal Podoplean order. The order Cyclopoida Burmeister, 1835, is paraphyletic and now encompasses Poecilostomatoida Thorell, 1859, as a sister to the family Schminkepinellidae Martinez Arbizu, 2006. Within Harpacticoida Sars, 1903, both sections, Polyarthra Lang, 1948, and Oligoarthra Lang, 1948, are monophyletic, but not sister groups. The order Canuelloida is proposed while maintaining the order Harpacticoida s. str. (Oligoarthra). Cyclopoida, Harpacticoida and Cyclopinidae are redefned, while Canuelloida ordo. nov., Smirnovipinidae fam. nov. and Cyclopicinidae fam. nov are proposed as new taxa. Copepods are one of the most abundant metazoans on Earth1. During their diversifcation, these small aquatic crustaceans have colonized almost all benthic and planktonic aquatic ecosystems, from deep-sea oceans2 to the crevices of the Himalayan glaciers3.