Dease Liard Sustainable Resource Management Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dease Liard Sustainable Resource Management Plan Dease Liard Sustainable Resource Management Plan Background Document January, 2004 Ministry of Sustainable Resource Management Table of Contents Table of Contents................................................................................................................. i List of Tables ...................................................................................................................... ii List of Maps ........................................................................................................................ ii List of Acronyms ...............................................................................................................iii Glossary .............................................................................................................................. v 1. Introduction.................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Plan Objectives ........................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Background.............................................................................................................. 1 1.3 MSRM Mandate, Principals and Organizational Values......................................... 2 1.4 SRM Planning and Plans Defined............................................................................ 3 1.5 Scope of Dease-Liard SRM Plan ............................................................................. 5 1.6 The Process .............................................................................................................. 6 1.6.1 Dease-Liard Area Assessment Process............................................................. 6 1.6.2 Sustainable Resource Management Planning Process...................................... 8 1.7 Dease-Liard Plan Area........................................................................................... 10 1.7.1 Biophysical Setting ......................................................................................... 10 1.7.2 Social and Economic Description................................................................... 13 2. Land Use Context ........................................................................................................ 17 2.1 Kaska Dena Values and Concerns ......................................................................... 17 2.1.1 General Concerns and Values......................................................................... 17 2.1.2 Zone Specific Values and Concerns ............................................................... 19 2.2 Present Land Use Issues, Interests, and Uncertainties........................................... 20 2.2.1 Treaty Negotiations and Interim Measures Agreement .................................. 21 2.2.2 Forestry Economic Measures Agreement....................................................... 22 2.2.3 Memorandum of Understanding on Forest Stewardship for the..................... 23 Kaska Traditional Territory ............................................................................ 23 2.2.4 Establishment of Working Forest Landbase................................................... 23 2.2.5 Results-Based Code ........................................................................................ 24 2.2.6 Protection of Boreal Forests............................................................................ 25 2.2.7 Timber Availability......................................................................................... 25 2.2.8 Access Planning and Management ................................................................. 26 2.2.9 Sub-surface Resources.................................................................................... 26 2.2.10 Caribou Management.................................................................................... 27 2.2.11 Tourism and Recreation Management.......................................................... 27 2.2.12 Other Issues, Interests and Uncertainties...................................................... 28 2.2.13 Dease-Liard SRMP Relation to the Treaty Negotiations, IMA,................... 28 Forestry EM Agreement, and Timber Availability....................................... 28 3.0 Legal Direction .......................................................................................................... 28 3.1 Existing Policies and Planning Direction .............................................................. 28 4.0 Biodiveristy/Wildlife ................................................................................................. 29 4.1 Introduction............................................................................................................ 29 4.2 Ecological Patterns................................................................................................. 29 4.2.1 Ecological Setting ........................................................................................... 29 Dease-Liard Sustainable Resource Management Plan i Background Document, July 2003 4.2.2 Patterns of Diversity ....................................................................................... 30 4.2.3 Rare Species and Communities ...................................................................... 31 4.3 Natural Disturbance Regimes ................................................................................ 33 4.3.1 Disturbance Types .......................................................................................... 33 4.3.2 Temporal and Spatial Patterns of Fires........................................................... 33 4.4 The Focus of Biodiversity Planning ...................................................................... 36 4.5 Coarse Filter Management..................................................................................... 37 4.5.1 Seral Stage Distribution and Opening Sizes ................................................... 37 4.5.2 Old Seral Stage Retention and Representation ............................................... 37 4.5.3 Stand Structure................................................................................................ 38 4.5.4 Landscape Connectivity.................................................................................. 38 4.5.5 Species Composition....................................................................................... 38 5.0 Protected Areas .......................................................................................................... 39 5.1 Existing Protected Areas........................................................................................ 39 5.2 Protected Areas Strategy Study Areas ................................................................... 39 5.3 Horse Ranch Zone.................................................................................................. 41 6.0 Timber........................................................................................................................ 41 6.1 Previous Timber Evaluations................................................................................. 41 6.2 Timber Zones......................................................................................................... 41 7.0 Visual Quality ............................................................................................................ 42 7.1 Assessment of visual quality resources.................................................................. 42 7.2 Preliminary decisions............................................................................................. 42 Appendices........................................................................................................................ 45 Appendix A: Current Seral Stage Distribution ................................................................. 45 List of Tables Table 1: Summary of fire-induced disturbance rates and patch sizes in the plan area and related boreal regions Table 2: Numbers and sizes of remnant stands by fire size class in boreal mixedwood of Alberta Table 3: Existing parks and protected areas within the Dease-Liard plan area Table 4: Goal 2 PAS Study Areas List of Maps Map 1: Plan area Map 2: Biogeoclimatic zones and ecosections Map 3: First Nations traditional territories Map 10: Heritage trails and Horse Ranch zone Map 11: Protected areas and Cabinet approved study areas Map 12: Timber Map 15: Dease-Liard Area Assessment zones Dease-Liard Sustainable Resource Management Plan ii Background Document, July 2003 List of Acronyms AAC Annual allowable cut AOA Archaeological Overview Assessment ATV All terrain vehicle BEC Biogeoclimatic ecosystem classification BWBS Boreal Black and White Spruce biogeoclimatic zone CDC Conservation Data Centre COSEWIC Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada CPAWS Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society CWD Coarse woody debris DFO Department of Fisheries and Oceans (now Fisheries and Oceans Canada) DLAA Dease-Liard Area Assessment DLAAP Dease-Liard Area Assessment Process DLPA Dease-Liard planning area DLSRMP Dease-Liard Sustainable Resource Management Plan ECA Equivalent clearcut area FPC Forest Practices Code FRC Forest Resources Council FRPA Forest and Range Practices Act FSP Forest Stewardship Plan GIS Geographic information system HLP Higher level plan IAMC Inter Agency Management Committee IMA Interim Measures Agreement IWMS Identified wildlife management strategy LLP Landscape
Recommended publications
  • The Carcross/Tagish First Nation Final Agreement
    THE CARCROSS/TAGISH FIRST NATION FINAL AGREEMENT among THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA, THE CARCROSS/TAGISH FIRST NATION and THE GOVERNMENT OF THE YUKON Published under the authority of the Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development Ottawa, 2005 www.ainc-inac.gc.ca 1-800-567-9604 TTY only 1-866-553-0554 QS-5384-000-EE-A1 Catalogue: R2-427/1-2005E-PDF ISBN:0-662-42156-6 © Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada Cette publication peut aussi être obtenue en français sous le titre: Entente définitive de la Première nation des Carcross/Tagish The preceding Elders' Statement does not form part of the Carcross/Tagish First Nation Final Agreement. AGREEMENT made this 22nd day of October, 2005. AMONG: Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada as represented by the Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development (hereinafter referred to as "Canada"); AND The Carcross/Tagish First Nation as represented by the Khà Shâde Héni of the Carcross/Tagish First Nation (hereinafter referred to as the "Carcross/Tagish First Nation"); AND The Government of the Yukon as represented by the Government Leader of the Yukon on behalf of the Yukon (hereinafter referred to as the "Yukon"), being the parties to this Carcross/Tagish First Nation Final Agreement (hereinafter referred to as "this Agreement"). WHEREAS: the Carcross/Tagish First Nation asserts aboriginal rights, titles and interests with respect to its Traditional Territory; the Carcross/Tagish First Nation wishes to retain, subject to this Agreement, the aboriginal rights, titles and
    [Show full text]
  • Optimal Production of Chinook Salmon from the Stikine River
    Fishery Manuscript No. 00-1 Optimal Production of Chinook Salmon from the Stikine River by David R. Bernard Scott A. McPherson Keith A. Pahlke and Peter Etherton July 2000 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Sport Fish FISHERY MANUSCRIPT NO. 00-1 OPTIMAL PRODUCTION OF CHINOOK SALMON FROM THE STIKINE RIVER by David R. Bernard Division of Sport Fish, Anchorage Scott A. McPherson Keith A. Pahlke Division of Sport Fish, Douglas Peter Etherton Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Whitehorse, Yukon Territory Canada Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Sport Fish 333 Raspberry Road Anchorage, AK 99518-1599 July 2000 This investigation was partially financed by the Federal Aid in Sport Fish Restoration Act (16 U.S.C. 777-777K) The Fishery Manuscript series was established in 1987 for the publication of technically-oriented results of several years' work undertaken on a project to address common objectives, provide an overview of work undertaken through multiple projects to address specific research or management goal(s), or new and/or highly technical methods. Fishery Manuscripts are intended for fishery and other technical professionals. Fishery Manuscripts are available through the Alaska State Library and on the Internet: http://www.sf.adfg.state.ak.us/statewide/divreports/html/intersearch.cfm This publication has undergone editorial and peer review. David R. Bernard a Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Sport Fish, PTS 333 Raspberry Road, Anchorage, AK 99518-1599, USA Scott A. McPherson Keith A. Pahlke Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Sport Fish, Region I P. O.
    [Show full text]
  • Little Rancheria Caribou in the Yukon: Evaluation of Winter Habitat Quality and Habitat Use
    Little Rancheria Caribou in the Yukon: Evaluation of Winter Habitat Quality and Habitat Use R. F. Florkiewicz1, N. Flynn2, N. MacLean3, S. R. Francis4, J. Z. Adamczewski and V. Loewen TR-03-03 Acknowledgements This study benefited from the dedication and assistance of many individuals over the years. James Magun, Philip Donnessey, Frances Naylen, Jennifer Stanniforth and Bruce Bennett worked days and seasons tallying the many varieties of plants and habitats of the study area. Rhonda Rosie supervised fieldwork that provided detailed insights into the plants and nuances of ecosystem classification in the southeast Yukon. Jason Marshal provided able bodied and companionable assistance in the field and on the computer during the data collation phase of the project. Aaron Foos spent many days cleaning and organizing data into a useable form. Stuart Alexander and Marcus Waterreus assisted with presentation of spatial information and animal relocations. Len Mychasiw, Manfred Hoefs, Brian Pelchat and Mary Gamberg provided support throughout the many phases of this work. The data and information collected during this study would not have been possible without the fixed wing expertise and extensive study area knowledge of Byron Dalziel, Myles Bradford, Leland Bradford, Devlin and Bill Oestreich, with logistical support by Sherry Bradford and Rebecca Bradford-Andrew. Jim Reid of Pacific Western Helicopters provided expert flying in all kinds of weather conditions and Sharon Reid provided logistical support for the project. Rick Marshall and Mark Williams (MWLAP) gave permission for information and data for this report. We are grateful to conservation officers Daryl Anderson and Kevin Johnstone for their assistance with location and distribution flights.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern First Nations Health and Wellness Plan
    Northern First Nations Health and Wellness Plan Northern First Nations Health Partnership Committee Northern Health • Chief Operating Officer, Northeast: Betty Morris • Chief Operating Officer, Northwest: Penny Anguish • Chief Operating Officer, Northern Interior: Michael McMillan • Chief Medical Health Officer: Dr. David Bowering • Vice President, Clinical Programs and Chief Nursing Officer: Dr. Suzanne Johnston • Regional Director of Aboriginal Health: Agnes Snow • Vice President, Medicine: Dr. Ronald Chapman • Vice President, Aboriginal Health: Dr. Margo Greenwood Northern Regional Table • FNHC Northwest Political Representative: Charles Morven • Northwest Technical Representative: Health Director: Therese Hagan • Northwest Technical Representative: Health Director: Lauren Brown • FNHC North Central Political Representative: Warner Adam • North Central Technical Representative: Julia Morris • North Central Technical Representative: Health Director: Vern Tom • FNHC Northeast Political Representative: Tammy Watson • Northeast Technical Representative: Health Director: Colleen Totusek • Northeast Technical Representative: Corene Apsassin Ex Officio Members • Northern Health Authority CEO or Delegate • First Nations Health Authority CEO or Delegate Northern Regional Table secretariat provided by: • Regional Health Liaison FNHA (North Central/Northern Interior): Nicole Cross • Regional Health Liaison FNHA (Northwest): Brian Mairs Northern Health secretariat provided by: • Lead, Aboriginal Health Engagement & Integration: Victoria Stewart
    [Show full text]
  • Escapements of Chinook Salmon in Southeast Alaska and Transboundary Rivers in 1998
    Fishery Data Series No. 99-17 Escapements of Chinook Salmon in Southeast Alaska and Transboundary Rivers in 1998 by Keith A. Pahlke August 1999 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Sport Fish FISHERY DATA SERIES NO. 99-17 ESCAPEMENTS OF CHINOOK SALMON IN SOUTHEAST ALASKA AND TRANSBOUNDARY RIVERS IN 1998 by Keith A. Pahlke Division of Sport Fish, Douglas Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Sport Fish P. O. Box 240020 Douglas, AK 99824-0020 August 1999 Development and publication of this manuscript were partially financed by the Federal Aid in Sport Fish Restoration Act (16 U.S.C. 777-777K ) under Project F-10-14, Job No. S-1-6. The Fishery Data Series was established in 1987 for the publication of technically oriented results for a single project or group of closely related projects. Fishery Data Series reports are intended for fishery and other technical professionals. Distribution is to state and local publication distribution centers, libraries and individuals and, on request, to other libraries, agencies, and individuals. This publication has undergone editorial and peer review. Keith A. Pahlke Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Sport Fish P. O. Box 240020, Douglas, AK 99824-0020, USA This document should be cited as: Pahlke, Keith A. 1999. Escapements of chinook salmon in Southeast Alaska and transboundary rivers in 1998. Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Fishery Data Series No. 99-17, Anchorage. The Alaska Department of Fish and Game administers all programs and activities free from discrimination on the basis of sex, color, race, religion, national origin, age, marital status, pregnancy, parenthood, or disability.
    [Show full text]
  • Ministerial Order 112/1997
    PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA ORDER OF THE MINISTER OF HEALTH Ministerial Order No. M 112 I, Joy K. MacPhail, Minister of Health and Minister Responsible for Seniors, order that 1. B.C. Reg. 27/97, the Community Health Council Regulation, is amended as set out in the attached Appendix. 2. (1) Section 1 (75) of B.C. Reg. 115/94, the Health Council Regulation, is rescinded. (2) B.C. Reg. 260/95, the Queen Charlotte Islands/Haida Gwaii Health Council Regulation, is rescinded. 3. (1) Section 1 (64) of B.C. Reg. 115/94, the Health Council Regulation, is rescinded. (2) B.C. Reg. 60/95, the Fort Nelson-Liard Health Council Regulation, is rescinded. Mir,jdter o Health and Minister Responsible for Seniors This Order made the 11 day of fr A2C,14 , 199/ at Victoria, British Columbia. (This part is for administrative purposes only and is not pan of the Order) Authority under which Order is made: Act and section:- Health Authorities Act, section section 6(1) and (2) Other (specify):- ist h-.7//s KAHAMM0.97\CHC.MAR APPENDIX B.C. Reg 27/97, the Community Health Council Regulation, is amended by adding the following sections: Queen Charlotte Islands/Haida Gwaii Health Council 33. (1) The Queen Charlotte Islands/Haida Gwaii Health Council is continued as a community health council under section 6(1) of the Act. (2) The area of British Columbia constituting the Queen Charlotte Islands/Haida Gwaii Health Council is set out in Schedule A. (3) The Queen Charlotte Islands/Haida Gwaii Health Council consists of 15 members.
    [Show full text]
  • CAMPS on the LAND Considerations and Opportunities
    CAMPS ON THE LAND Considerations and Opportunities in the Yukon and northern British Columbia September 2006 Donald Reid Wildlife Conservation Society Canada Whitehorse Wildlife Conservation Society Canada Camps on the Land 1 SUMMARY Camps on the land are a strong force for community development, bringing youth and elders together in a non-urban environment where traditional knowledge and skills can be passed on among generations through direct experience. This report summarizes the key considerations in developing camps on the land, based on the experiences of First Nations in the Yukon and northern British Columbia. These include the sharing of a vision, the development and realization of an organization, guidelines for participation, and thoughts on productive sites and timing. Finally, the document summarizes key governmental and non-governmental resources that First Nations can use to develop and fund camps on the land. INTRODUCTION For cultures evolved in an intimacy with land and nature, continued experience of the land is necessary for cultural integrity and meaning. First Nations cultures in Canada evolved in such an intimacy, but various forces have dislocated people from the land in the last century or so. Attachment to the land has not been lost from collective experience nor will. The desire to foster traditional cultural meaning through intimacy with and understanding of nature still persists. This short document outlines some examples of how that desire has been realized by First Nations in the Yukon and northern British Columbia, through the organization of “camps on the land”. Examples include: Tr’ondek Hwech’in First Fish and First Hunt camps, Vuntut Gwichin summer hunting and fishing camps, Champagne-Aishihik Culture and Science Camps, Kaska Dena Youth Environment Camp (see Figure 1 for Traditional Territories).
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Navigability Report for Stikine River
    United States Department of the Interior IJ:::.~ ~ .. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT "\ TAKE PRIDE" Alaska State Office INAMERICA 222 W. 7th Avenue, # 13 Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7599 http://www.ak.blm.gov To: File AA-085787 (1864) From: Navigable Waters Specialist Subject: Navigability ofStikine River, Southeast Alaska On February 17, 2005, the State of Alaska (State) filed an application for a recordable disclaimer of interest for the bed of the Stikine River from its mouth to the United States-Canada International Boundary, a distance of approximately 27 miles. The State also applied for lands underlying "all named interconnecting sloughs including Binkleys Slough, Red Slough, Guerin Slough, King Slough, Andrew Slough, Hooligan Slough, Shakes Slough, Shakes Lake, North Arm, and Ketili River, between the ordinary high water lines of the left and right banks .... " The State included with its application a legal description of the river, supporting evidence, and a map dated April 5, 2004 showing the Stikine River.l The State's submissions are more fully described in Attachment A. On June 4, 2007, the State submitted additional information in support of its application for the bed ofthe Stikine River. In this letter, the State asserted that the Tongass National Forest did not include the beds of navigable waters within the exterior boundaries of the reserve and, therefore, did not defeat the State's title to the bed ofthe navigable Stikine River.2 As the State's evidence shows, the Stikine River has been used almost continuously as a highway of commerce since before the Purchase of Alaska in 1867. Both Great Britain and the United States recognized the river's importance as a highway in the Washington Treaty of May 8, 1871.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Water Governance, Ontologies, and the Politics Of
    Article Nature and Space Environment and Planning E: Nature and Respecting water: Space 0(0) 1–23 ! The Author(s) 2018 Indigenous water Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav governance, ontologies, DOI: 10.1177/2514848618789378 and the politics of kinship journals.sagepub.com/home/ene on the ground Nicole J Wilson University of British Columbia, Canada Jody Inkster University of Alberta/Yukon College, Canada Abstract Indigenous peoples often view water as a living entity or a relative, to which they have a sacred responsibility. Such a perspective frequently conflicts with settler societies’ view of water as a ‘‘resource’’ that can be owned, managed, and exploited. Although rarely articulated explicitly, water conflicts are rooted in ontological differences between Indigenous and settler views of water. Furthermore, the unequal water governance landscape created by settler colonialism has perpetuated the suppression of Indigenous ways of conceptualizing water. This paper thus examines the ‘‘political ontology’’ of water by drawing on insights from the fields of critical Indigenous studies, post-humanism, and water governance. Additionally, we engage a case study of four Yukon First Nations (Carcross/Tagish, Kluane, Tr’onde¨kHwe¨ch’in, and White River First Nations) in the Canadian North to examine their water ontologies through the lens of a politics of kinship including ideas about ‘‘respecting water.’’ We also examine the assumptions of settler- colonial water governance in the territory, shaped by modern land claims and self-government agreements. We close by discussing the implications of Indigenous water ontologies for alternate modes of governing water. Keywords Indigenous law, indigenous water governance, ontological politics, Yukon First Nations, Yukon, Canada Introduction We respect not only the water we utilize, we respect the land around it because it feeds into the water.
    [Show full text]
  • 3Nation-BC Collaborative Stewardship Forum: Phase 2 Final Report On
    3Nation-BC Collaborative Stewardship Forum: Phase 2 Final Report on Collaborative Governance Review and Research Jodi Gustafson & Kimberly Heinemeyer Round River Conservation Studies 9/28/20 Final Report September 2020, Prepared for The 3 Nations - British Columbia Collaborative Stewardship Forum 3Nation-BC CSF Co-Governance Phase 2 Final Report Round River Conservation Studies CONTENTS Report Summary .................................................................................................................................... iv Recommendations .............................................................................................................................. v Constructive Relationships: ............................................................................................................ v Identifying Shared Values: .............................................................................................................. v Information used in decision-making processes............................................................................ vi A regional framework and shared decision-making ...................................................................... vi Define and implement short term “pilot” projects ....................................................................... vi Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................... vii 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Liard First Nation Newsletter R I a O
    rst Fi Na d t Liard First Nation Newsletter r i a o i n L K A S K A Issue 1 June 2020 Message from the Chief relationship within the business community. The debt owed to the federal government has been reduced, and reports and Council on funding provided are submitted on time. Dear Liard First Nation Members: We have expanded the staff employed by LFN and have a housing officer and an employment officer. A Housing In June of 2017, the current Council began its term, and the Committee was established to oversee and administer the last three years have been challenging and rewarding. housing allocations. The Coronavirus (COVID-19) has presented LFN with unex- In the area of economic development, this Council has pected issues. In response to the risk posed by COVID-19 addressed the corporate financial trouble of the past and and the economic pressure, the LFN Council provided cleaned up the old mess. We established a new develop- financial relief and essential services to keep members ment corporation, First Kaska, which is on the right path healthy and safe. to creating job opportunities and wealth for LFN citizens. Much progress has been made during this time. This Council has rebuilt the relationship with the Govern- As of April 1, 2018, LFN has no longer been under ment of Yukon and negotiated agreements, such as the third-party management and the Council have been in Nahanni Range Road and the Robert Campbell Highway, charge. Since this change, all funds have been accounted that will provide jobs for members.
    [Show full text]
  • Warburton Pike (1861-1915)
    152 ARCTIC PROFILES Photo: Provincial Archives of British Columbia No. 4510. British Columbia has lost her foremost sportsman, and the eller on huntingtrips to the B .C . interior and other parts of the Dominion is the prer by an author who had achieved con- North. siderable note, by the death of Mr. Warburton Pike. News of August 1889 found Pike embarking by canoe fromFort Res- the demise of the well-known hunter was received in a cable from London, but the manner of his death is unknown. (Daily olution on what he called “an ordinary shooting expedition” Colonist, 30 October 1915) north of Great Slave Lake, where he hoped to “penetrate this unknown land, to see the musk-ox, and find out as much as I Warburton Pike was born into an old Westcountry family could about their habits, and the habits of the Indians who go near Wareham, Dorset, in 1861. He was educated at Rugby inpursuit of them every year. ” Thuscommenced the 14 School inan atmosphere of muscularChristianity, the physical months of hard travel, privation, and adventure described so emphasis of which was not lost on him. From Rugby he went vividly in Pike’s classic book The Barren Ground of Northern up to Brasenose College, Oxford, where he became a close Canada. friendof Earl Haig, the future fieldmarshal. Like many For five months he explored and hunted with the Beaulieu another young Englishman of his time andclass, Pike was at- clan - “the biggest scoundrels I ever had to travel with” - tracted to outdoor life and distantlands. In 1884, drawn by the and Yellowknives as far as the Coppermine country north of raw emptiness of British Columbia, he purchased ground on Lac de Gras.
    [Show full text]