Molecular Evolution of Visual System Genes in Fishes
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Molecular Evolution of Visual System Genes in Fishes by Cameron James Weadick A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Toronto © Copyright by Cameron James Weadick 2012 Molecular Evolution of Visual System Genes in Fishes Cameron James Weadick Doctor of Philosophy Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Toronto 2012 Abstract For many species, vision contributes to a number of fitness-related tasks, including mating and the detection of prey and predators. Selection on the visual system should therefore be strong, especially when ecological or genomic changes open new avenues for evolutionary changes. Visual system proteins are thus attractive systems for molecular evolutionary analyses. This thesis presents a collection of evolutionary studies on two gene families, opsins and crystallins. Opsin proteins determine the wavelengths of light detected by the retina, while crystallin proteins contribute to lens transparency and refractory power. My studies focus on teleost fishes, because teleost visual ecology is exceptionally diverse and because gene duplication is common in this group. In Chapter One, I outline the relevance of protein variation to organismal evolution and describe the analytical methods employed throughout this thesis. Chapter Two considers the long- wavelength sensitive (LWS) opsins of the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). The guppy is shown to possess multiple LWS opsins that have accumulated differences at functionally important amino acid sites since duplicating. Chapter Three focuses on the guppy’s main predator, the pike cichlid Crenicichla frenata, which is shown to have a greater capacity for short-wavelength vision than previously believed. However, this cichlid possesses three fewer opsins than closely- ii related African cichlids, a difference partly due to duplication of a green-sensitive (RH2) opsin in African cichlids. In Chapter Four, this RH2 duplication event is studied in greater depth; variation in selective constraint is documented following gene duplication and between species from different lakes. Some of the analytical methods employed in Chapter Four were newly developed, as detailed in Chapter Five, where a test for functional divergence among clades is evaluated and then improved upon through the presentation of a new null model that better accommodates among-site variation in selection. In Chapter Six, phylogenetic relationships within the βγ lens crystallin superfamily are clarified, and the functionally distinct γN family is shown to have evolved conservatively compared to other crystallin families. The thesis concludes with suggestions for future directions for evolutionary research on opsins and crystallins, and summarizes recent work that has built on these studies. iii Acknowledgments First and foremost, I would like to thank Belinda Chang and Helen Rodd, my co-supervisors, for their support (academic, financial, and otherwise) throughout my PhD. I learned a great deal from both of them and they graciously provided me enough rope to nearly hang myself on several occasions. I hope they forgive my occasional stubbornness, my late-night half-panicked emails, and the fact that I couldn't quite cut it as a behavioural ecologist. Asher Cutter and Allan Baker filled out my supervisory committee. I thank them both for their feedback and for humouring me as I more-or-less introduced a new study system every committee meeting and thesis chapter. Asher deserves extra thanks for reading over my entire thesis and for serving on my final examination committee. I would also like to acknowledge Marla Sokolowski, Locke Rowe, and David Guttman for serving on my various committees and for keeping me honest about the reach of my thesis work (and for doing so nicely). Karen Carleton graciously traveled to Toronto in November to be my external examiner and let it slide that a solid chunk of my thesis involves analyzing her old data; that was very much appreciated. Ellis Loew is thanked for carrying out the MSP analyses presented in Chapter Three and for doing so with barely any forewarning, while Ziheng Yang is thanked for providing assistance (unknowingly, via the PAML discussion forum) on modifying his codeml program's source code and for subsequently agreeing to include the results of my work in his software. I also acknowledge the various members of the Chang and Rodd labs who helped keep the labs running despite my slovenly, nocturnal ways, as well as Dimitra Kolovos and the various members of the ROM and CAGEF sequencing centers for providing me with precious data. More generally, the EEB department and some very generous funding sources (including from NSERC and U. Toronto’s VSRP) helped keep me afloat and occasionally productive. Beyond my thesis work, I was fortunate to become involved in a number of side projects with other students and faculty members. For that, I'd like to recognize Kat Hult and Steve Tobe, Loksum Wong and Vince Tropepe, Alex de Serrano and Anna Price, and Yayi Huang and iv Francesco Santini. If I'd no choice but to work solely on my thesis this long while I'd have surely lost my mind. All are thanked for letting me join in these productive distractions. On that note, I must also thank the many incredible grad students and postdocs kind enough to share a word and a drink with me over these last several years. I'd list them all, but there are too many, by far, and I'm afraid I'd foolishly miss a key name or three. They're all quite awesome, and I hope they know that. My lab mates in the Rodd and Chang labs deserve special note, as do my office mates in RW507 and RW415. But, here, I'd just like to note Anna Price and Ilke van Hazel for years of friendship and for helping me survive my initially terrifying (but ultimately rewarding) foray into big city living. My family was incredibly supportive throughout this entire process despite the fact that I never was able to really explain what it was I was doing to any degree of satisfaction, or what it was that I might end up doing afterwards. They certainly deserved more phone calls and visits than I gave, and I hope they don't hold that against me. The same goes for my friends made before grad school, many of whom are long lost, yet still appreciated greatly. Finally, thanks must go, of course, to Bonnie Fraser, my partner in pretty much everything. I'm quite sure that she's the absolute tops. Bonnie, thank you so much for believing in me, and thank you so much for waiting for me. v Statement of Contributions Chapters Two and Six were published as co-authored papers with my co-supervisor, Belinda Chang. Chapters Three through Five are co-authored manuscripts that are currently being prepared for journal submission. Chapters Four and Five were also co-authored by Belinda, while Chapter Three was co-authored by Belinda, my other co-supervisor, Helen Rodd, and Professor Ellis Loew (Cornell University), who carried out the microspectrophotometric analyses. In each case, I carried out the bulk of data collection, analyses, and writing; study/experimental designs were devised in consultation with one or both of my co-supervisors. vi Table of Contents Acknowledgments iv Statement of Contributions vi Table of Contents vii List of Tables x List of Figures xi Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Protein Evolution and its Organismal Relevance 2 1.2 Gene Duplication and Divergence 4 1.3 Detecting Selection in Protein-coding Genes 6 1.4 The Molecular Biology of Vertebrate Vision 12 1.5 Visual Ecology in Guppies and Cichlids 16 1.6 Thesis Overview 18 1.7 References 19 Chapter 2 Long-wavelength Sensitive Visual Pigments of the Guppy (Poecilia reticulata): Six Opsins Expressed in a Single Individual 24 2.1 Introduction 26 2.2 Results and Discussion 29 2.3 Conclusions 35 2.4 Methods 36 2.5 Figures 39 2.6 Tables 45 2.7 References 48 2.8 Supplementary Material 52 Chapter 3 Characterizing the Visual Pigments of the Trinidadian Pike Cichlid (Crenicichla frenata): A Less Colourful World for Neotropical Cichlids? 54 vii 3.1 Introduction 55 3.2 Methods 58 3.3 Results 65 3.4 Discussion 72 3.5 Figures 78 3.6 Tables 85 3.7 References 89 3.8 Supplementary Material 95 Chapter 4 Molecular evolutionary analysis of duplicated RH2a opsins in African cichlids 114 4.1 Introduction 115 4.2 Methods 118 4.3 Results 124 4.4 Discussion 131 4.5 Figures 136 4.6 Tables 141 4.7 References 148 4.8 Supplementary Material 152 Chapter 5 An improved likelihood ratio test for detecting site-specific functional divergence among clades of protein-coding genes 163 5.1 Introduction 164 5.2 Methods 167 5.3 Results and Discussion 171 5.4 Conclusions 178 5.5 Figures 179 5.6 Tables 181 5.7 References 185 5.8 Supplementary Material 188 viii Chapter 6 Molecular Evolution of the βγ Lens Crystallin Superfamily: Evidence for a Retained Ancestral Function in γN Crystallins? 195 6.1 Introduction 197 6.2 Methods 200 6.3 Results 206 6.4 Discussion 213 6.5 Figures 220 6.6 Tables 224 6.7 References 230 6.8 Supplementary Material 236 Chapter 7 Conclusions 249 7.1 Chapter 2: Guppy long-wavelength sensitive (LWS) opsins 250 7.2 Chapter 3: Trinidadian pike cichlid opsins 256 7.3 Chapter 4: Duplicated African cichlid green sensitive (RH2a) opsins 259 7.4 Chapter 5: Clade model likelihood ratio testing 261 7.5 Chapter 6: βγ lens crystallin superfamily 263 7.6 Summary 265 7.7 References 266 ix List of Tables Table 2.1 ........................................................................................................... 45 Table 2.2 ........................................................................................................... 47 Supplementary Table 2.1 .................................................................................